Not dreaded 'a valid Widget' error

Similar Questions

• I get a "not an application valid win 32 error" when I try to download and run a program

  Original title: win 32 error

  When I dounload one program and try to run it I get one is not a valid win32 application error. This happens on more than 1 program how to fix this?

  Hello

  ·         What program are you trying to install?

  ·         The program is compatible with Windows XP?

  ·         Since when are you facing this problem?

  ·         What web browser do you use to download a file?

  I suggest to delete temporary internet files from your computer, and then try to download the program, save it in a different location and try to install it from there.

   

  Get the error: not a valid 32-bit application can have several origins:

  I have listed some of them below.

  The file is corrupted, bad or missing.
  (a) if the hard drive is damaged or hurt it cause work programs to fail, either because not all data can be read from the hard drive the program is damaged on the drive. Run scandisk and defrag on the hard disk to check for potential errors.

  (b) If you are running the program from a shortcut on the computer, verify that the program is still on the computer. In some cases if the program is no longer installed on the computer, you can get this error.

  File is not designed for your version of Windows:

  
  (a) If you try to run a program that is not designed for your version of Windows, you can get this error.

  (b) Although many old programs designed to work in older versions of Windows will work with new versions of Windows, unfortunately, not all programs will not work.

  (c) if the program is an MS-DOS program more former start program or Windows, you can get this error.

  (d) if the program is designed for a 64-bit version of Windows and you are running in a 32-bit version of Windows, it will not work and generate this error.

  File is a virus, worm or other malicious program file.

  
  (a) this error can be generated by a file that is a virus, worm, Trojan horse or other type of malware file. Often, this will result because the antivirus installed on the computer will not allow the file to install or run. Try to analyze the file to check, it is not a virus or infected.

  (b) if the file has been checked and is clean, it is always possible that the virus protection program or a another program installed on the computer is at the origin of questions during installation or execution of the program. Start the computer in Mode safe and try to run the program. start the computer in Mode safe will be that nothing is running in the background that could cause this problem.
  
  Hardware incompatibility.

  one) If you get this error during the installation of a program, it is also possible that the CD-ROM drive or the drive that you are installing the program from is not compatible with Windows or drivers that are not compatible with Windows.

  (b) download the latest drivers for your CD player or other of the manufacturer of the computer or the manufacturer of the equipment. (Microsoft does not pilot for other materials)

  Follow these steps and check if that helps:

  Step 1:

  I suggest you to download and run the latest Microsoft security on your computer Scanner and check if it helps:

  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx

  Note: the data files that are infected must be cleaned only by removing the file completely, which means there is a risk of data loss.

   

  Step 2:

  I suggest you follow the troubleshooting steps form the article and check if it helps.

   

  Problems installing and uninstalling programs on Windows computers

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/2438651

• Download error: Unknown Publisher / is not an application valid win 32

  I can't download anything. My hijack this wont even work. Previous download exe. files do not work I get a
  Download error: Unknown Publisher / is not an application valid win 32 I have Win xp.  Firefox browser on a gateway netbook. No floppy drive or c/d.

  No location with AVG or Malewarebytes Virus. AVG update itself. Security Windows has done as well.

  I was trying to Messenger from yahoo to d/l, then updating firefox.  Nada.

  Hello

  · Were there any changes made on the computer before the show?

  · Who is the service pack installed?

  1. try to download files from Internet explore and check the results.

  2. empty the Temp folder:

  a. Click Start, point to programs, point to Accessories, point to system tools and then click on disk cleanup.

  b. click C: or click the drive where Windows XP is installed and then click OK.

  c. Click to select the temporary files check box.

  d. click OK and then click Yes to confirm the deletion.

• When itunes download get the error, does not have a valid digital signature that verifies the publication server

  I can not download itunes. I have windows vista.  I get the error message: does not have a valid digital signature that verifies the publication server

  Hi klofcc,

  1. are you able to download and install other applications without any problem?

  2. What is the full error message?

  I suggest that you try the steps from the following links to the article and check if it helps:

  Problem installing iTunes or QuickTime for Windows

  I hope this helps.

• GoldenGate - OGG-00146 - 600 error - [< file Logbackup >] is not an archive valid

  Hi all

  I'm replicating data between two SQL servers.

  SQL Server - 2008 R2 SP3 version

  This morning, I found a few excerpts from my ABENDED State with the error message following

  Function ERROR OGG - 00146 VAM VAMRead returned unexpected result: error 600 - VAM customer report < [CArchiveLayout::BuildLayout] [<LogBackupFile >] is not an archive valid. >.

  The report of customer INFORMATION OGG-00178 VAM < last LSN read: 000fa2e5:00000010:0001

  No open transactions >.

  Report Client INFORMATION OGG - 00178 VAM < sanity checking is not enabled.

  I validate the backup and is good. In addition, the permissions on the backup files are good.

  What has not worked for me -

  1. alteration retrieves the next log backup time (to blow the log file, he complains). Tried with several times but nothing fruitful. Whenever he complained that the log backup that is reading is not an archive valid.

  2. alteration from start now. Extract attempted to read the latest logbackup and failure with the same question.

  It actually worked-

  Recreated the extract and used start now. Surprisingly, it worked.

  Please help me with following Qs-

  1. I can't stick to the autour work that I implemented. Fortunately, he came on stage at the moment. I don't want to use start now if I came across the same issue in production. Please let me know how to solve this problem.

  2 correct me if I'm wrong - the whole time, I think, when I edit the extract to start now, it is supposed to read what is in the active log instead of the log backup. It didn't happen when I modify the existing clip. But it happened when I recreated the extract. Any thoughts?

  Kind regards

  Rakesh

  As your extract is able to start now, to start after the recess, it is perhaps a problem with the checkpoint file. If the checkpoint file is corrupted, then none of the alter commands are effective and you must re-create the checkpoint files by recreating the extract it self.

  If the problem persists try copy command of showch of information outputs and recreate the extract and change control with option of lsn points. The root, you will have to study why the checkpoint file is getting damaged (problems with discs)

• Build process fails with the error 'and not an executable valid '.

  Hello

  
  I'm trying thinapp Softelec VPraster (lettering 64-bit) on Win7 (64 bit), I use ThinApp 4.1.6. All by building his error showing as ' %drive_C%\Program Files\softelec\VPraster V11\BatchExecutor.exe: not an executable valid"."» I tried to disable this executable and buiding, but gettting the same error for all executables.

  I also captured 32-bit installation of the same application, which is building very well.

  Any suggestions?

  Thank you.

  ThinApp does not currently support 64-bit applications. We support the execution of 32-bit applications on 64-bit OS. I would say that the application that you have managed to capture is not a 64 bit application.

• First Adobe could not find any valid editing modes error

  Hi, I have installed adobe first 8 and patch update and when Ic lick new project I get the message Adobe premiere error could not find a valid editing mode, reinstall please, and start again.  I reinstalled, installed patch, checked for the vidc.draw in the registry and none of them haven't made.

  Have XP service pack 3, with valid disk space etc...  Any suggestions greatly appreciated.

  I read his could be caused by the codec?

  If it is due to a codec problem, then you can fix by installing the latest version of Quicktime, according to installation instructions.

  If that does not do it, go to C:/PROGRAM FILES/ADOBE/PREMIERE ELEMENTS 8 / SETTINGS/SEQUENCE PRESETS and make sure it's a NTSC and PAL folder and that each contains the preset project files.

  If this isn't the case, you have a problem.

  If these files are there, click on the button new project notes appearing on the lower left corner of the option settings of the project Panel.

• input file, not an archive valid

  Hello

  Initially, the application was written in CVI 6.0. Now, I created a new project and workspace and adds all the files.

  The build works very well. But I get when a link (build) is the error message "error: input file is not an archive valid: 'c:\Projects\...\bin\i7000.lib'". ""

  With another library, I get the same problem: "uart.lib."

  The other just lib files work fine.

  I saw in an old post a solution: just to recreate the project I did. But it did not work in my case.

  Any help?

  At soon Andreas

  Hi Andreas,

  I tried to build a simple project by calling a function of each of the libraries that you provided:

  Get_Uart_Version();
  FloatToHex (12.34);

  The project has been successfully building, there was no mistake in the linker. I tried with CVI 2013 and CVI 2013 SP2.

  You can try and see if such a simple project always gives the same error of link for you?

  If not, it is possible that the problem is not only a question of format library. You would have to try and simplify the project until you find the portion of code that triggers the error from the linker. As an alternative, you can send us your project and we can try to isolate the problem.

  Best regards
  ALPAR

• How to download MicrosoftFixit50202.msi of the flash player for my not more long computer work - error 0 x 80070002

  How to download MicrosoftFixit50202.msi of the flash player for my not more long computer work - error 0 x 80070002.   I found the site for download fixit, but I have no desktop feature other than the startup repair options.  I thot I could download fixit from my flash drive solution, but I can't find a command prompt to access.  It is the only page from command prompt I can find... I'm in x:\windows\system32\cmd.exe trying to find the good order for my location flashdrive G:

  I used to go G and get G but it says only that go and get are not internal or external commands and not an executable program or batch file

  HELLLLLLLPPPPPPP!   Thank you!

  x:\ I do not think it is a 'valid' for what you intend. I used a 2nd computer and the original disk, I don't remember tho if I used windows file transfer or just copy, but I had the disc copied to the flash drive and reinstalled windows 7. I have still no working dvd rom (x 2) they open and close (sometimes), but the drivers need to be mounted to something incomplete. repair is absent as well. some other problems too but its been executed in this way for months (apx5). here and there, I get an email from answers, that's how I arived here really (enroute) hope this helps (a bit)

• Partition table does not have a valid system partition

  I am working on a Dell XPS 420 computer for a customer.  She has Windows Vista installed on it (not sure what version of Vista).

  He's doing a loop, wherever it loads to the point where I can see the bottom and the mouse, but it stops there.  After 5 minutes of him sitting on this screen, it restarts, I can't access one of the Advanced menu F8.  I tried Safe Mode, and after that it loads the crcdisk it restarts, it does with Safe Mode, Mode safe mode with networking Mode and safe mode with command prompt.  I can't use the last known configuration because it will just try to load and eventually restart.

  Things I've tried is that I ran a diagnosis of hard drive and memory, and they both pass.

  I tried the repair with the regedit option and load the system hive in the registry.

  I tried the bootrec command.

  Well I put in a disk for Installation of Vista and choose the repair option.  I did the auto diagnosis and repair option (first choice I think) and I checked the report after he finished saying that it fixes itself and needed to restart (which he did not in fact)

  Well the result that came was that the Partition Table does not have a valid System Partition.

  I tried the bootrec command, and they all said it has repaired but it did not, when I tried to do the bootrec /rebuild he gave me the message "element not found".

  I ran a test diagnosis system and I received the following message

  System test
  error code 0146
  Msg error code 2000-0146
  MSG HDD 0 - self-test log contains previous errors. Given the code and can be used by the support message technology guide to help diagnose the problem.

  be honest, I just need to know if I need to replace the hard drive or not, it's for a customer.

  I did not see if the HDD is set to AHCI or SATA in the bios again, but I will when I get home today, but I would like some answers backup.

  Hi countryboyofal,

  I suggest that you contact Dell support for the outcome of the diagnostic system.

  http://support.Dell.com/support/topics/global.aspx/support/DellCare/contact_us?c=us&l=en&s=Gen&redirect=1

   

  I hope this helps!

  Halima S - Microsoft technical support.

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Windows 7 will not active but valid as authentic

  Hello

  I had a problem with widows recently during a windows update now, it will not active but valid as authentic.

  The data below, any help would be appreciated.

  Diagnostic report (1.9.0027.0):
  -----------------------------------------
  Validation of Windows data-->

  Validation code: 0
  Code of Validation caching online: 0x0
  Windows product key: *-* - D9WP8 - 24DBB-FXKYH
  Windows product key hash: 6yNa5Bmr + 1MSjsltIn0j1xLW4f4 =
  Windows product ID: 00426-068-2901612-86180
  Windows product ID type: 5
  Windows license type: retail
  The Windows OS version: 6.1.7601.2.00010100.1.0.001
  ID: {A3EE6B19-C8A8-490B-A07F-A28117E19E50} (3)
  Admin: Yes
  TestCab: 0x0
  LegitcheckControl ActiveX: Registered, 1.9.42.0
  Signed by: Microsoft
  Product name: Windows 7 Ultimate
  Architecture: 0x00000000
  Build lab: 7601.win7sp1_gdr.130318 - 1533
  TTS error:
  Validation of diagnosis:
  Resolution state: n/a

  Given Vista WgaER-->
  ThreatID (s): n/a, hr = 0 x 80070002
  Version: N/a, hr = 0 x 80070002

  Windows XP Notifications data-->
  Cached result: n/a, hr = 0 x 80070002
  File: No.
  Version: N/a, hr = 0 x 80070002
  WgaTray.exe signed by: n/a, hr = 0 x 80070002
  WgaLogon.dll signed by: n/a, hr = 0 x 80070002

  OGA Notifications data-->
  Cached result: n/a, hr = 0 x 80070002
  Version: N/a, hr = 0 x 80070002
  OGAExec.exe signed by: n/a, hr = 0 x 80070002
  OGAAddin.dll signed by: n/a, hr = 0 x 80070002

  OGA data-->
  Office status: 100 authentic
  Microsoft Office Standard 2007-100 authentic
  OGA Version: N/a, 0 x 80070002
  Signed by: n/a, hr = 0 x 80070002
  Office Diagnostics: 025D1FF3-364-80041010_025D1FF3-229-80041010_025D1FF3-230-1_025D1FF3-517-80040154_025D1FF3-237-80040154_025D1FF3-238-2_025D1FF3-244-80070002_025D1FF3-258-3

  Data browser-->
  Proxy settings: N/A
  User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Win32)
  Default browser: C:\Program may Explorer\iexplore.exe
  Download signed ActiveX controls: fast
  Download unsigned ActiveX controls: disabled
  Run ActiveX controls and plug-ins: allowed
  Initialize and script ActiveX controls not marked as safe: disabled
  Allow the Internet Explorer Webbrowser control scripts: disabled
  Active scripting: allowed
  Recognized ActiveX controls safe for scripting: allowed

  Analysis of file data-->

  Other data-->
  Office details: {A3EE6B19-C8A8-490B-A07F-A28117E19E50}1.9.0027.06.1.7601.2.00010100.1.0.001x 32*-*-*-*-FXKYH00426-068-2901612-861805S-1-5-21-1082223913-4131312028-1596324861INTELRAWRDACPIPhoenix Technologies, LTD6.00 PG20070418000000.000000 + 000B33C3007018400FA08090409GMT Standard Time(GMT+00:00)03100100Microsoft Office Standard 200712B0EB0E560DFF775JIMP/INrbWXhzM4UxtuPldOsrx0 =81607-954-7347687-644511

  Content Spsys.log: 0 x 80070002

  License data-->
  The software licensing service version: 6.1.7601.17514

  Name: Windows 7 Ultimate edition
  Description: operating system Windows - Windows (r) 7, retail channel
  Activation ID: a0cde89c-3304-4157-b61c-c8ad785d1fad
  ID of the application: 55c92734-d682-4d71-983e-d6ec3f16059f
  Extended PID: 00426-00172-068-290161-00-2057-7601.0000-1082013
  Installation ID: 017830788831101622882961608161033531323383047942046434
  Processor certificate URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=88338
  Machine certificate URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=88339
  Use license URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=88341
  Product key certificate URL: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=88340
  Partial product key: FXKYH
  License status: initial grace period
  Time remaining: 21780 minute (s) on (15 day (s))
  Remaining Windows rearm count: 3
  Trust time: 18/04/2013 19:31:10

  Windows Activation Technologies-->
  HrOffline: 0x00000000
  HrOnline: 0x00000000
  Beyond: 0 x 0000000000000000
  Event timestamp: 4:4:2013 17:26
  ActiveX: Registered, Version: 7.1.7600.16395
  The admin service: recorded, Version: 7.1.7600.16395
  Output beyond bitmask:

  --> HWID data
  Current Hash HWID: NgAAAAIABAABAAEAAQABAAAAAgABAAEA6GGiizI3liCYh0jkgCuqdiJfTPZax + aYKhQG8yqF

  Activation 1.0 data OEM-->
  N/A

  Activation 2.0 data OEM-->
  BIOS valid for OA 2.0: Yes, but no SLIC table
  Windows marker version: N/A
  OEMID and OEMTableID consistent: n/a
  BIOS information:
  ACPI Table name OEMID value OEMTableID value
  APIC IntelR AWRDACPI
  FACP IntelR AWRDACPI
  MCFG IntelR AWRDACPI
  SSDT PmRef Cpu0Ist
  SSDT PmRef Cpu0Ist

  Windows product ID: 00426-068-2901612-86180

  The ID of the product - 068 - indicates a not for resale MSDN account. If you are not the account holder and you bought it in a box at retail, the box and its contents is counterfeit. Request an immediate refund from the seller

  For more information, see this:

  http://social.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/genuinewindows7/thread/a2444f34-0AFF-4f29-a8ac-67e28b0c0285

  And this:

  http://social.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/genuinewindows7/thread/309bb621-92d5-43d6-98c1-2bb51b35607f

  To see how these counterfeits are more, see:

  http://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=hzqNNiOM0cs

  You can buy a legitimate windows from a legitimate retailer.

  It validates is because you are in the initial grace period.

• XSD is not in a valid state.

  Hello

  my client has added more than 3 operations in the WSDL file existing, so what I've done, I have modified existing wsdl and xsd according to the new requirement, it is error xsd is not in a valid state for the proxy service when I consume the xsd .i have tried ways.even lats I checked each solution of element.no.

  a sad, this is 2 days back, I developed the service by updating the latest wsdl and xsd, it was working fine unfortunetly, I deleted any workspace.

  I am trying since yesterday, no solution, help me please to get out of this problem as soon as POSSIBLE.

  Thnks

  Bala

  HI Bala,

  Can you confirm that your changes are persisted in the MDS?

  You can try to remove the MDS artifacts for your service deployment and redeploy your service.

  Antonis

• Acrobat 9 pro reinstall do not accept the valid serial number

  HDrive on my laptop could not and had to quickly get the new laptop and reinstall all programs. Have Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro serial number. Reinstalled but the program will not accept the valid serial number for the underlying program, he went from level. This is the product of my Adobe account information. I am a frantic reporter trying to meet deadlines one just noticed I don't have that a few days left of the "30 Giorni", I was given as a test for the PROGRAM I ALREADY paid for! What can I do to fix this? Any suggestions greatly appreciated. I checked the forums a bit, but couldn't find a similar question. I'm starting to hate Adobe... no phone support, and 'chat' window, we recommend that you use online now has cobwebs on this subject, it has been sitting there so long w / no activity.

  Name of the product	Serial number	Version	Platform	Registration date
  Adobe Acrobat Pro	DELETED BY ADMIN	9.0	Win	June 4, 2010
  Adobe Acrobat	DELETED BY ADMIN	7.0	Win	April 15, 2007

  Yes, uninstall and run the cleanup tool before you install using the cleaning tool CC to resolve installation problems. CC, CS3 - CS6

  In the menu drop-down see what are the options eligible Acrobat 7.

  Failure, know that Acrobat 9 installer can generate a "challenge code". You who give customer service and they give you a response type Code to unlock it so it will take your serial number for Acrobat 9.

  Error: "this serial number is not for a product calling it" | CS6, CS5.5, CS5

  I'm a volunteer Forum, it's the customer who can only accomplish this process.

• Values for timestamp default XMLTable causes ORA-01843: not one month valid

  When I try to provide a default value for a timestamp value in the function XMLTABLE, I am greeted with an error - ORA-01843: not one month valid -no matter how to give this default value. If there is a value in the XML or not is irrelavant to this bug occurs. It seems to be an incomplete correction of bug number 9745897 (thread).

  Select x.*

  Of

  XMLTable ('/ DOC' from xmltype ("< DOC > < DT > 2013-08-14T 15: 08:31 < /DT > < / DOC > '"))

  DT COLUMNS timestamp default sysdate) x;

  Select x.*

  Of

  XMLTable ('/ DOC' from xmltype ("< DOC > < DT > 2013-08-14T 15: 08:31 < /DT > < / DOC > '"))

  By default systimestamp timestamp COLUMNS DT) x;

  Select x.*

  Of

  XMLTable ('/ DOC' from xmltype ("< DOC > < DT > 2013-08-14T 15: 08:31 < /DT > < / DOC > '"))

  DT of COLUMNS timestamp default to_char (systimestamp, ' ' YYYY-MM-DD "T" HH24:MI:SS)) x;)

  Edit: somewhat more followed.

  It works:

  Select x.*

  Of

  XMLTable ('/ DOC' from xmltype ("< DOC > < / DOC > '"))

  Date of the dt of COLUMNS by default sysdate) x;

  It works, too, with the exception of its just the date and not the time

  Select x.*

  Of

  XMLTable ('/ DOC' from xmltype ("< DOC > < / DOC > '"))

  DT COLUMNS timestamp default sysdate) x;

  It does not work

  Select x.*

  Of

  XMLTable ('/ DOC' from xmltype ("< DOC > < / DOC > '"))

  By default systimestamp timestamp COLUMNS DT) x;

  ORA-01861: literal does not match the format string

  Hello

  First of all, let's check the manual for the DEFAULT clause:

  Function SQL/XML XMLTABLE in Oracle XML DB

  The optional parameter DEFAULT clause specifies the value to use when the PATH expression results in an empty sequence (or NULL ). His expr is an XQuery expression that is evaluated to produce the default value.

  According to the documentation, the DEFAULT clause must specify an XQuery expression.

  However, is false, the implementation only expects an expression that matches a string, the content is not interpreted.

  Bottom line is, if we specify directly a string, the expression is implicitly converted into one, and everyone knows how things can go when implicit conversions appear, especially when the dates or timestamps are involved.

  Now let's focus on the impact of the DEFAULT clause on the evaluation of the query.

  When a DEFAULT clause is specified, Oracle has rewritten projection differently and does not use the native format of XS: DateTime to convert the value:

  Select x.*

  Of

  XMLTable ('/ DOC' from xmltype ('))

  2013-08-14 T 15: 08:31

  ')

  DT of COLUMNS by default systimestamp timestamp

  ) x

  becomes:

  SELECT THE EXISTSNODE (VALUE(KOKBF$), '/ DOC/DT')

  WHEN 1 THEN LAUNCH (TO_TIMESTAMP (SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL (SYS_XQEXVAL (SYS_XQEXTRACT (VALUE(KOKBF$), '/ DOC/DT')), 50.1, 2)() as a timestamp)

  ELSE CAST (TO_TIMESTAMP (TO_CHAR (SYSTIMESTAMP (6)), 'SYYYY-MM-DD "T" HH24:MI:SSXFF') AS timestamp)

  END "DT".

  TABLE ("SYS". "XQSEQUENCE"(EXTRACT ("SYS"." XMLTYPE"(")

  2013-08-14 T 15: 08:31

  (((,'/ DOC'))) ' KOKBF$ '.

  See the red part: it does not use the format parameter, the conversion depends on NLS session parameters.

  When there is no DEFAULT clause, the TO_TIMESTAMP function uses an explicit format:

  Select x.*

  Of

  XMLTable ('/ DOC' from xmltype ('))

  2013-08-14 T 15: 08:31

  ')

  Dt timestamp - default systimestamp COLUMNS

  ) x

  rewritten to:

  SELECT CAST)

  TO_TIMESTAMP)

  SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL (SYS_XQEXVAL (SYS_XQEXTRACT (VALUE(KOKBF$), '/ DOC/DT'), 0,0,20971520, 0), 50.1, 2)

  "SYYYY-MM-DD"T"HH24:MI:SSXFF"

  )

  BY timestamp - default systimestamp

  ) "DT".

  TABLE ("SYS". "XQSEQUENCE"(EXTRACT ("SYS"." XMLTYPE"(")

  2013-08-14 T 15: 08:31
  (((,'/ DOC'))) ' KOKBF$ '.

  So yes, maybe there is a bug here.

  Edit: somewhat more followed.

  It works:

  Select x.*

  Of

  XMLTable ('/ DOC' from xmltype (""))

  Date of the dt of COLUMNS by default sysdate) x;

  Actually no, it does not work. Certainly, maybe it produces no error, but the result is incorrect.

  As explained, the conversion is based on the NLS (NLS_DATE_FORMAT in this case) session:

  SQL > show nls_date_format settings

  VALUE OF TYPE NAME

  ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------

  string of NLS_DATE_FORMAT JJ/MM/RR

  SQL >

  SQL > select sysdate to double;

  SYSDATE

  --------

  16/08/13

  SQL > select x.*

  2 from

  3 xmltable ('/ DOC' passing xmltype (""))

  4 COLUMNS dt date default sysdate) x;

  DT

  --------

  13/08/16

  Oracle first converts SYSDATE to a string using current NLS_DATE_FORMAT, having for result Aug 16, 13 '

  Then this string is converted to a DATE as XS: date is 'YYYY-MM-DD' leading 13/08/16 (13 August, 0016) which is incorrect.

  The obvious solution to this problem is to control how Oracle converts implicitly string to timestamp format:

  SQL > alter session set NLS_TIMESTAMP_FORMAT = "YYYY-MM-DD"T"HH24:MI:SS."

  Modified session.

  SQL > select x.*

  2 from

  3 xmltable ('/ DOC' from xmltype ('))

  2013-08-14 T 15: 08:31

  ')

  4 dt of systimestamp default timestamp COLUMNS

  (5) x;

  DT

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  2013-08-14 T 15: 08:31

  SQL > select x.*

  2 from

  3 xmltable ('/ DOC' passing xmltype (""))

  4 dt of COLUMNS by default systimestamp timestamp) x;

  By default systimestamp timestamp COLUMNS DT) x

  *

  ERROR on line 4:

  ORA-01861: literal does not match the format string

  SQL > select x.*

  2 from

  3 xmltable ('/ DOC' passing xmltype (""))

  Cast of default timestamp COLUMNS dt (systimestamp timestamp) 4) x;

  DT

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

  2013 08-16 T 12: 32:58

• not a month valid

  ATTENDENCE OUTTIME SET UPDATE = '19:10 ' WHERE EMPID = 'E002' AND ATTENDENCEDATE = to_date ('2013-02-26 ',' YYYY.) MM DD')
  
  When I run this query (in oracle) I had 'not one month valid' error. How can I fix it with this request. ??
  
  Thanks in advance

  Timestamp

  You can not just to stuff a string in a timestamp column.

  You must use TO_TIMESTAMP as you did TO_DATE.