number vcpu per VM

Hello.

Increase number of vcpu per VM. Now I can put only 8 vcpu per VM, but my server has 32 vcpu and I want to give more than 8 vcpu one VM.

Thank you

http://www.VMware.com/files/PDF/perf-vSphere-cpu_scheduler.PDF

AWo

VCP 3 & 4

\[:o]===\[o:]

= You want to have this ad as a ringtone on your mobile phone? =

= Send 'Assignment' to 911 for only $999999,99! =

Tags: VMware

Similar Questions

Massimo di vCPU per una VM number: forward-looking dalla licenza?

Ho googlato a po' e no ho trovato risposta... di parlando vSphere 5.1 o 5.5, it e ' una limitazione al massimo di che posso assegnare vCPU number a una VM is ho licenza Standard?
MI sorge it due perched ho dubbio cluster, uno uno standard company, London in both host li vedo con gli "logical processor: 24 ' (e abilitato the hypertreading, infatti, sono due con core 6 taken by host), pero stessa con VM 24 vCPU riesco ad accenderla sul cluster Enterprise, not su quello my standard... Dove error che compare of fra the possibility che this essere essere limitazioni per volume di licenza.
Virtual machine has 24 virtual processors, but the host only supports 8. The number of virtual processors may be limited by the OS selected for the guest virtual computer or licensing for the host.

SE non ricordo male vSphere 5.1 ha delle differenze in neither alle vCPU assegnabili ad una VM, mentre nella 5.5 all licenze permettono di assegnare it massimo delle vCPU one leave the ESXi free che arrived fino a 8.

C that ' e a Punto ben fatto: ordinary Virtualization: what's new vSphere 5.5 in a summary.

--

Rocco Sicilia

http://www.roccosicilia.it

ESXi 5: how vCpu per vm instead of 32?

Hello
We would like to migrate our server ESX 4 to version 5 (business and license).
I know, pdf max configuration, we can have the max 32 vcpus per vm... But that is all the options available?
In ESX 4, we can we 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 8 vcpu... but on ESXi 5?
Thanks in advance

I believe you can - but since you have only 32 logical processors (2 x 8 cores x 2 HT) I wouldn't recommend it - by stacking the vCPUs you run a high risk of CPU contention - I usually make you that number of LCPUs is double, the largest number of vCPUs in a VM.

I want to know that the total number allowed per process and overall user objects?

In my system, I have windows xp sp3 installed. my system by the number of user process object is 10000. When the total user of my system object reaches 10000, I'll be able to do whatever it is like opening a new tab in iexplorer. so, I just want to be consistent with what is the total number by process and in the entire system (all processes)

Hey Kumaran Villi.

Please take a look at the information provided in respect of user objects in this MSDN blog entry:
Pushing the limits of Windows: USER and GDI Objections - part 1

Maximum number of VCPU

Hello.
What is a maximum number of vCPU per VM on esx3.5?
I thought that this depends on number of hearts on pchysical cpu, but some told me other things.
Thank you

4-3, 5 - If you upgrade to vSphere, you can go beyond depending on the license, but you must be careful when linking to a large number of vCPUs are you likely to encounter problems with CPU scheduling.

Maximum number of virtual machines by free ESXi hypervisor?

Community of VMware,
I just installed the free 5.5 ESXi hypervisor and I wonder if the same virtual machine limits apply to the stand-alone scenario as vCenter? Can I run actually 512 VMs? What, if any, is the maximum number of virtual machines, I can run on a free version of ESXi?

From 5.5 ESXi limits most have been removed, but only a limit of 8 vCPU per VM remains. So if I'm wrong, the VM 512 mentioned for each host (see http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vsphere5/r55/vsphere-55-configuration-maximums.pdf) affect the free hypervisor.

André

Limit of vCenter Server Essentials 5.0 vs 5.1 vCPU

Hello
There currently restrictions during execution of vCenter Server Essentials in terms of vCPUs 5.0? For example I manage 3 guests by vCenter Server, each with 2 physical processors; (20 carrots/host) send me carrots close to 60 who manages a single Server vCenter.
How about on 5.1 vCenter Server Essentials? I went through each document maximum Configurations for each version or stipulates a limit for vCPUs managed by a single vCenter, but this does not take into account license.
Thank you and best regards!
GDunck

Hello

you are not limited in the total number of cores. (well an Essentials kit houses 3 with 2 Sockets each, your base number max would be so [max available by socket hearts] x 2 x 3)

The license only limits the number of vCPUs that you configure for a single virtual machine. And it comes to 8 vCPU per VM in vSphere 5.0 and 5.1 Essentials.

Concerning

vSphere Licensing 5.1: rights of vCPU

Hi all
I wonder about the rights of vCPU by vSphere edition.
In the standard edition, the right of vCPU is 8.
Does this means:
(1) VM can have max of 8 socket with 1 core per socket
(2) VM can have max of 8 shooting BUT the number of per-socket basis may be more
I m having some VM that requires up to 16 cores, can the standard adjustment of vSphere license or do I go for a business one?
Please specify this.
Kind regards
Valentine's day

The number of vCPU refers to the total number of Sockets/virtual cores. With a payment of vCPU-8, you may have either 8x1core, 2x4core...

André

vCPU distribution issues

Hello
I am trying to understand the virtual machines on the same physical host and their CPU usage. I have a two processors four hearts in this host. I have allocated 3 vCPUs and 2 vCPUs to the application server to the terminal server. (once again both on the same physical host). I also read on the assignment only 1 vCPU per VM, but have not yet tried. What do you think of this information below?
Application server:
This shows the configuration of default resources: http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/EzKHXVEHU49ShpPy6wDK5S3TS606dIvr41qRtVcvCu0?feat=directlink
It shows a picture of the performance of the virtual machine: http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/i-m_0e92bunQhGpU9jV3ny3TS606dIvr41qRtVcvCu0?feat=directlink
Why is the max cpu 600 MHZ when I allocate two 2.5 ghz vCPU? Is that the size of the chart just specced out for certain types of average use?
Server terminal server:
Which shows the configuration of default resources: http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/EbD1hRLKnYBiY9WtqH6U8i3TS606dIvr41qRtVcvCu0?feat=directlink
It shows a picture of the performance of the virtual machine: http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/PvHV1_PcIyqKqV9HepSf-y3TS606dIvr41qRtVcvCu0?feat=directlink
The max cpu this is 3000 MHZ when I'm allocating three 2.5 ghz vCPU? (once again the thoughts are welcome)
Also, if I use integrated planning in ESXi, and I simply assign 1, 2 or 3, etc., vCPUs, the Scheduler uses all hearts to its tasks? He only appears in the paintings of performance as 0, 1, 2 on the server terminal server in three vCPU and 0 and 1 on the application server?
Thanks for your thoughts.

Hi vm408,

First, it is important to know what type of processor you have. In what concerns HyperThreading, which is on the number of cores logic and physical host compare.

On the course of VMware, we discussed after that, and VMware trainer has indicated that:

1 vmkernel always works on physical base 0. This is important when approve you carrots vCPU/physical.

2. multiple vCPU help some time when you have a native (SQL, Exchange) multithreaded application. It can also act against when multiple virtual machines with several vCPU multithreaded application running, e.g.: host with 8 logical cores, has 2 x 4vCPU SQL each + 1 swap x 4vCPU = 12 vCPUs. To run the respective application each VM needs 4 cores to be ready. Tip: you VM is fine until you see CPU ready 2 > by all hearts or combined.

3. it is not recommended, but guaranteed return, you can assign physical basis to vCPU (non-physical 0-based). Many benefits of virtualization will become unavalable, but some insulation and performance will be provided.

If your host has hyperthreading processors, assign not strange vCPUs (5, 3, etc.). There is a tip - hyperthreading last processors are actually appears in the guest as hyperthreading OS and the same behavior, i.e. vCPU 1 is phisycal and vCPU 2 would be its logical side.

With regard to your questions:

If I give a two VM cores and another three VM cores, are their main resources that overlap... am I sharing carrots? -You process will be treated on any available physical core. Point of virtualization is to share cycles available CPU.

As on my pictures, it shows that the virtual machine with two being on 0 and 1 and the virtual machine with three be 0-2. Does this mean that they share carrots? -Yes, but only when the kernel is available. vCPU 0 on VM1 = is not not using physical core 0 (vmkernal) when she needs and = 0 on VM2 vCPU can run on the physical base 7. He is the host jobs to find availble free kernel and to calculate its power.

There is nothing to fear in your scenario. If you need to buy a faster CPU performance, in terms of vCPU 1 or 2 should be sufficient.

delay to 20ms for CPU's like 1000 years for us humans. I don't think that what is happening really (IMHO).

5.5 vCPU Maximum for Standard and Enterprise editions

I know the maximum vCPU per VM with enterprise more licenses are 64, but what is the maximum rates with 5.5 for Standard and Enterprise?

Enterprise is 32

Standard is 8

.. l'ennesimo su chiarimento vCpu

Ciao, come da oggetto di need avrei a chiarimento sulla configurazione ottimale per vm.
Ho diversi host sia 4.1 che 5 con essential vSphere, generally by he modesto carico delle vm configurated sempre 2 vCpu per macchina... no ho may problemi di prestazioni sulle vm e Reed he consumo di cpu sull'host indicated tramite vSphere client on "resources" e sempre inferiore al 20%
ORA, uno degli host 4.1 presso a datacenter, cui sono features:
4 CŒURS processors x 2,499 GHz processor (processor Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q8300 @2.50 type)
Sockets of processors: 1
Core per Socket: 4
Locical CPUs: 4
Hyperthreading: inactive
Memory: 8 GB
Ho misconfigured 4 vm
Linux IPCOP 2 vCpu 1024 Ram
Windows 2008 2 vCpu Ram 6144
Linux Ubuntu Server 2 vCpu Ram 3072
Linux Ubuntu Server 2 vCpu Ram 2048
It role data dell'host era di solo sleep he e windows firewall linux by some to servizio, in seguito una ho la add una seconda vm
Ed both sono diventate webserver e anche per altri servizi used cars.
Since the last server e costante di RAM request... Mediamente not United States 2 GB più uno dell'host... Ho pensato di eliminare due linux e farne una unica a questo punto più carrozzata.
E that the domanda viene.
Risorse sull'host mi danno currently he consumo ram a 7445,00 su 8090. by cui come ram più o meno invariato lascio e configurated 6 GB in total
My I have core... since currently sull'host CPU USE mi mediamente indica
1600 - 2200 di total of the UN of the su 4 x 2, 499 (total 9 996?) ... e the bar use e intorno al 20% di... e corretto Winegardner di usare 4 vCore by the nuova che sostituira 2 vm?
USO questa informazione per gli altri host... anche perche tutti i miei generally host hanno UN carico cpu intorno al 20 e mi viene he dubbio che non sto bene the hw exploiting...
Fatto di salvo questa ibm_db impiccata... no ho may avuto problemi di cpu by any vm... pero mi e understand useful bene come ottimizzare.
Grazie by the cortesi answers.

con win 2008 gli infili the vCPU an accesa macchina (forse con killed her licenza non you can vmware) e unica cosa che devi fare e riavviare he Task Manager is era aperto

(in realtà he discorso cambia is hai dei Server mssql, Può essere necessario he riavvio perched usi nuove vCPU)

The HTML output to the existing script maps help

I found a script that had a lot of things that I needed. I have since deleted stuff we didn't need and added some other stuff that we need. The result is good, but now I want to turn this into a page in HTML and it gets an error. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I'm pretty good with PowerShell to be somewhat dangerous with things.

$Cluster = 'CLUS-1'
$ClusterName = Get-Cluster $Cluster
$Datastores = $ClusterName | Get-Datastore | Where {$_.Name -notlike '*LOCAL'  -and $_.Name -notlike 'VM_Datastore*' -and $_.Name -notlike 'Templates' -and $_.Name -notlike 'ISO' -and $_.Name -notlike '*SCRATCH*' -and $_.Name -notlike 'Archive'}
$Clusters = Get-View -ViewType ComputeResource | Where {$_.Name -like $ClusterName.Name}

$Clusters | % {
$Cluste                      = $_
$VMHostsView                 = $null
$VMHostsView                 = Get-View $Cluste.Host -Property Name, Hardware, Config
$VMss                        = $ClusterName | Get-VM
$HostCount                   = ($VMHostsView | Measure-Object).Count
$VMCount                     = 0 + ($VMss | Measure-Object).Count
$VMsPerHost                  = [Math]::Round(($VMCount/$HostCount), 1)
$vCPU                        = 0 + ($VMss | Measure-Object -Sum -Property NumCPU).Sum
$allocatedram                = 0 + ($VMss | Measure-Object -Sum -Property MemoryGB).Sum
$avgrampervm                 = [Math]::Round(($allocatedram/$VMCount), 1)
$pCPUSocket                  = ($VMHostsView | % { $_.Hardware.CPUInfo.NumCpuPackages } | Measure-Object -Sum).Sum
$TpCPUSocket                += $pCPUSocket
$pCPUCore                    = ($VMHostsView | % { $_.Hardware.CPUInfo.NumCpuCores } | Measure-Object -Sum).Sum
$vCPUPerpCPUCore             = [Math]::Round(($vCPU/$pCPUCore), 1)
$TotalClusterRAMGB           = [Math]::Round((Get-Cluster $Cluster | Get-VMHost | % { $_ } | Measure-Object -Property MemoryTotalGB -Sum).Sum)
$TotalClusterRAMusageGB      = [Math]::Round((Get-Cluster $Cluster | Get-VMHost | % { $_ } | Measure-Object -Property MemoryUsageGB -Sum).Sum)
$TotalClusterRAMUsagePercent = [Math]::Round(($TotalClusterRAMusageGB/$TotalClusterRAMGB)*100)
$TotalClusterRAMFreeGB       = [Math]::Round(($TotalClusterRAMGB-$TotalClusterRAMUsageGB))
$TotalClusterRAMReservedGB   = [Math]::Round(($TotalClusterRAMGB/100)*15)
$TotalClusterRAMAvailable    = [Math]::Round(($TotalClusterRAMFreeGB-$TotalClusterRAMReservedGB))
$newvmcountram               = [Math]::Round(($TotalClusterRAMAvailable/$avgrampervm))
$DSCount                     = 0 + ($datastores | Measure-Object).Count
$TotalDSCapacityGB           = 0 + [Math]::Round((($datastores | Measure-Object -Sum -Property CapacityGB).Sum), 0)
$TotalDSFreeGB               = 0 + [Math]::Round((($datastores | Measure-Object -Sum -Property FreespaceGB).Sum), 0)
$TotalDSUsedGB               = [Math]::Round(($TotalDSCapacityGB - $TotalDSFreeGB),0)
$allocatedstorage            = 0 + ($VMss | Measure-Object -Sum -Property ProvisionedSpaceGB).Sum
$avgstoragepervm             = [Math]::Round(($allocatedstorage/$VMCount), 1)
$newvmcountstorage           = [Math]::Round(($TotalDSFreeGB/$avgstoragepervm))

New-Object PSObject |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Cluster Name" $ClusterName.Name |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Cluster - Host Count" $HostCount |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Cluster - VM Count" $VMCount |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Cluster - VM per Host" $VMsPerHost |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Compute - Number of pCPU" $TpCPUSocket |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Compute - pCPU per Core" $pCPUCore |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Compute - Number of vCPU" $VCPU |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Compute - vCPU per pCore" $vcpuperpcpucore |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Compute - Total Memory (GB)" $TotalClusterRAMGB |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Compute - Total Memory Used (%)" $TotalClusterRAMUsagePercent |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Compute - Total Memory Used (GB)" $TotalClusterRAMusageGB |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Compute - Total Memory Free (GB)" $TotalClusterRAMfreeGB |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Compute - Total Memory Allocated (GB)" $TotalClusterRAMReservedGB |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Compute - RAM Available for NEW VMs (GB)" $TotalClusterRAMAvailable |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Compute - Average RAM allocated per VM" $avgrampervm |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Compute - Remaining VMs based on available RAM" $newvmcountram |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Storage - Datastore Count" $DSCount |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Storage - Total Datastore Capacity (GB)" $TotalDSCapacityGB |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Storage - Total Datastore Free (GB)" $TotalDSFreeGB |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Storage - Total Datastore Used (GB)" $TotalDSUsedGB |
Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Storage - Average storage allocated per VM" $avgstoragepervm |


Add-Member -Pass NoteProperty "Compute - Remaining VMs based on available storage" $newvmcountstorage
}

{on the last line of the script after} add below line

| ConvertTo-Html | Out-file c:\log.html

Virtual machine has 12 virtual processors, but the host only supports 8?

Hi all I am using ESX 5.1 and have a machine Windows 2012 R2 Standard of virtual (vmx-09) comments that I'm moving to 8 processors to 12 processors. But when I turn on the virtual machine after changing the UC 12 I get the error message
"Virtual Machine has 12 virtual processors, but the host only supports 8. The number of virtual processors can be limited by the selected guest OS for the virtual machine or the granting of licenses for the host".
Now, I know that 2012 R2 Standard Windows can handle 12 processors and I thought that ESX 5.1 could also, but I'm wrong? This is the Standard of vSphere license 5. Thank you!

Hello

vSphere 5.1 Standard license has a 8 vCPU per VM limit.

Company = 32 vCPU

Business + 64 vCPU

You must upgrade to vSphere 5.5. This can be done with your vSphere license 5, as it is for all versions 5.X of vSphere and vCPU limit has been deleted in 5.5.

So you can have as many vCPU per VM that your host has logical cores.

Tim

CPU on each virtual machine

Hello
is that what everybody knows on the calculation in cpu on each virtual machine?
There are 2 cpu configuration section
1. virtual Socket number
2. number of per-socket basis
and the total number is = 1 * 2
I want to know if I installed a windows 2012 with standard license that supports the core 64 on a virtual machine
then set the virtual socket number to 4 and the number of base by socket to 4 the total number of base become = 16
Windows recognizes this as the core? and it works with that because it supports the core 64?
or not? It recognizes the slot as a new processor and install 4 cpu and it does not install or update...?
Thank you

This will give you a very good understanding on it

configuration of vCPU. Impact on performance between virtual Sockets and virtual cores? -frankdenneman.nl

getAllVMsOfCluster slow vs Get - VM

Hi all
I'm trying to convert a simple script PowerCLI broadband vCO (or shares in the future, when debugging is available for them...)
The PowerCLI script is very simple, it loops through all the virtual machines in a cluster and the vRAM output average / vCPU per VM.
The problem is that the action getAllVMsOfCluster take a lot of ugly of time (more than 3 minutes!) to return on a cluster with VM ~ 200, while the Get - VM cmdlet on the same cluster take 10-20 sec.
I think the Get - VM cmdlet uses a view and the getAllVMsOfCluster Action simply traverses the objects returned by the sdk/mob...
Is there a way to speed up the process (except using the plug-in, PowerShell, which I try to avoid as much as possible).
Here is the PowerShell and vCO of this simple script version:
Here's the script PowerCLI:
$clusterName = "mycluster.
$cluster = get-Cluster-name $clusterName
$vms = $cluster | Get - VM
$nbVMs = $vms.length
$nbvCPUs = 0
$nbvRAM = 0
foreach ($vm to $vms)
{
$nbvCPUs += $vm. NumCpu
$nbvRAM += $vm. MemoryMB
}
$nbvRAM = $nbvRAM / 1024
$nbvRAM = $nbvRAM / 1024
$avgvRAMPerVM = $nbvRAM / $nbVMs
$avgvCPUPerVM = $nbvCPUs / $nbVMs
Write-Host "nbVMs: $nbVMs".
Write-Host "nbvCPUs: $nbvCPUs".
Write-Host "nbvRAM: $nbvRAM".
Write-Host "avgvRAMPerVM: $avgvRAMPerVM".
Write-Host "avgvCPUPerVM: $avgvCPUPerVM".
I converted this to a vCO feed that looks like this:
Entry:
cluster as VC:ClusterComputeResource
Output:
avgvRAMPerVM under the number
avgvCPUPerVM under the number
Flow:
Action: getAllVMsOfCluster
Entry: Entry flow "cluster."
Output stream: attribute "vms" in the table of VC:VirtualMachine
Scriptable task: "do the math".
Entry: Flow attribute "vms" in the table of VC:VirtualMachine
Output:
AvgvRAMPerVM output stream
AvgvCPUPerVM output stream
Script:
var nbVMs = vms.length;
var nbvCPUs = 0;
var nbvRAM = 0;
for (var i in SMV)
{
nbvCPUs += vms [i].config.hardware.numCPU;
nbvRAM += vms [i].config.hardware.memoryMB;
}
nbvRAM = nbvRAM / 1024;
avgvRAMPerVM = nbvRAM / nbVMs;
avgvCPUPerVM = nbvCPUs / nbVMs;
System.log ("nbVMs:" + nbVMs);
System.log ("nbvCPUs:" + nbvCPUs);
System.log ("nbvRAM:" + nbvRAM);
System.log ("avgvRAMPerVM:" + avgvRAMPerVM);
System.log ("avgvCPUPerVM:" + avgvCPUPerVM);

I thought about it...

Although it is not a lot of documentation for it to the vCO, by using a view I could speed things up.

Below, the variable 'cluster' is a VC:ClusterComputeResource taken as Input of the workflow element.

The final code looks like this:

Set a bunch of var to store the results:

var nbVMs = 0;

var nbvCPUs = 0;

var nbvRAM = 0;

Get ViewManager & PropertyCollector singleton

var viewManager = cluster.sdkConnection.viewManager;

var propertyCollector = cluster.sdkConnection.propertyCollector;

Create a ContainerView for virtual machines from this group

var vmList = new Array();

vmList.push ('VirtualMachine');

Bird = viewManager.createContainerView (cluster, vmList, true);

Create an ObjectSpec to define the origin point of the search and ignore the element root (cluster) of the research

var objSpec = new VcObjectSpec();

objSpec.obj = myView.reference;

objSpec.skip = true;

Create a TraversalSpec to identify the type of object that we are interested in.

var traversalSpec = new VcTraversalSpec();

traversalSpec.name = "traverseEntities";

traversalSpec.path = "display";

traversalSpec.skip = false;

traversalSpec.type = "ContainerView;

Attach the TransversalSpec to our ObjectSpec search root.

objSpec.selectSet = new Array (traversalSpec);

Create a PropertySpec to identify the properties that we are looking for in the selected object

propertySpec var = new VcPropertySpec();

propertySpec.type = 'VirtualMachine ';

propertySpec.pathSet = new Array ('config.hardware.memoryMB', 'config.hardware.numCPU');

Create a PropertyFilterSpec to connect the object search & property search spec

var propertyFilterSpec = new VcPropertyFilterSpec();

propertyFilterSpec.objectSet = new Array (objSpec);

propertyFilterSpec.propSet = new Array (propertySpec);

Create an object of RetrieveOptions by default (the default values are fine)

var retrieveOptions = new VcRetrieveOptions();

var result = null;

to loop through the results:

do

{

If (result is nothing)

{

Get the first batch of results (first 100 results by default?)

result = propertyCollector.retrievePropertiesEx ([propertyFilterSpec], retrieveOptions);

}

on the other

{

During subsequent calls, get the next batch of 100 results

result = propertyCollector.continueRetrievePropertiesEx (result.token);

}

If (result! = null)

{

for (var i in result.objects)

{

(var j in result.objects [i] .propSet)

{

var name = result.objects [i] .propSet [j] .name;

var val = result.objects [i] .propSet [j] .val;

If (name is 'config')

{

nbvCPUs += result.objects [i] [j] .propSet.val.hardware.numCPU;

nbvRAM += result.objects [i] [j] .propSet.val.hardware.memoryMB;

}

}

nbVMs ++;

}

}

}

While (result.token! = null); the "token" property to determine whether or not there are more results to recover beyond the current batch.

I want the vRAM GB not MB.

nbvRAM = nbvRAM / 1024;

Average vRAM & vCPU per VM in this cluster

var avgvRAMPerVM = nbvRAM / nbVMs;

var avgvCPUPerVM = nbvCPUs / nbVMs;

Save all the outputs to verify that everything works:

System.log ("nbVMs:" + nbVMs);

System.log ("nbvCPUs:" + nbvCPUs);

System.log ("nbvRAM:" + nbvRAM);

System.log ("avgvRAMPerVM:" + avgvRAMPerVM);

System.log ("avgvCPUPerVM:" + avgvCPUPerVM);

number vcpu per VM

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for