numbers of limit of accuracy to 3 significant digits

Similar Questions

• How to reduce the number of significant digits after the decimal point, not only displays for example, 0.12345678 convert to 0.123 in all cells

  I imported a. Table TSV having 4000 rows and 20 columns in numbers, by changing its extension .tsv in .txt. Then, drag and drop in numbers.

  The actual values have too many significant digits to be useful and may be beyond the capacity of the numbers to calculate or to find 262.825892344384

  If there is a way to have the SS (4000 x 20) 'Numbers' to reduce the values currently stored in the entire document or a particular column or row

  262.825892344384 to 262.8259 I am not interested to the value, but the value actually stored and used for calculations.

  I have a table that uses the formula of round and takes as input the data that you have imported.  Then you can select the data in the round table, copy

  then paste the data in the original table by using the menu item "Edition > paste formula results.

  

  Ibn chart at right

  B2 = ROUND (Original Data::B2, 3)

  It's abbreviation dethrone select cell B2 and type (or copy and paste it here) the formula:

  = ROUND(Original Data::B2, 3)

  now select cell B2, copy

  Select the cells B2 to C2, dough

  A2 = Data::A2 Original

  Select cells A2 through C2, copy

  Select cells A2 through the last cell in column C, paste

  now select the data in the table 'Data rounded' copy

  Select the corresponding cells in the original table, select the menu item "Edition > paste formula results.

• scope and read the significant digits vi

  Hi all

  Let me start by giving you some background.

  I'm measuring a RMS (approximately 1.8V) voltage using NOR-Scope read Vi, which works very well, my problem is that I also try to calculate the current RMS within the same Vi, using a known resistance. With the voltage, I have only two significant digits using playback OR-Scope, which gives me too much a rounding error, when it comes to the current problem.

  So my question is this; is there another stock Vi that I could use to increase the number of significant digits to get or is it possible to increase the number of significant digits with the Vi? Other ideas are welcome and thank you for your help.

  I don't know what is this 'NO-Scope reading measure Vi', but how many significant digits you put your indicator (right click, properties)? If this does not help, please contact your VI.

  Cameron

• JavaScript to three significant digits rounded

  I found a JavaScript that I would use for rounding significant figures on a field:

  function sigFigs (n, GIS) {}

  mult var = Math.pow (10,

  GIS - Math.floor (Math.log (n) / Math.LN10)-1);

  return Math.round(n * mult) / mult.

  }

  In the properties of the field, as a custom calculation Script, I added the JavaScript code, but it doesn't seem to work.

  Any advice you can give me on what I am doing wrong would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you!

  Natalie

  A function simply sets a block or a code to run, but does not run, or run the code. To run the code, you must call the function. Since it is a function that could be reused many times in a form I would put this in the document-level script or in the page open for the first page. So, for your example, I would use the custom JavaScript calculation to call the function using the value of the field (event.value) and the number of significant digits.

  Event.Value = sigFigs (event.value, 3);

• How to get to 16 significant digits?

  My forum/google-fu fails me today, and I hope someone might be able to suggest something.
  
  Basically, I learned to turn the values passed in one currency to another by dividing by a rate of fx. This piece, I can handle it, but the incoming data are to 16 significant digits, and my output should also be in 16 s.f. format.
  
  Thus, assuming that I have given in the following format:
  

  with my_tab as (select 22673.333550957921 num from dual union all
                  select 0.0000000038002838659797923 from dual union all
                  select 123456789012345678 from dual)
  select * 
  from   my_tab

  What would be the most effective of the borough to 16 significant digits? Obviously, if it were 16 decimal places, it would be easy, I would just use the ROUND function...
  
  Published by: Boneist on October 31, 2008 15:35
  published the first number in my example is in sf 17, rolls eyes

  Hello

  Interesting problem!

  The whole part of LOG (10, num) tells you where the first significant digit is (how many decimal places to the left column of the 1).
  So:

  with my_tab as (select 22673.333550957921 num from dual union all
                  select 0.0000000038002838659797923 from dual union all
                  select 123456789012345678 from dual)
  SELECT     TO_CHAR (num)     AS raw_num
  ,     TO_CHAR     ( ROUND     ( num
                 , 15 - FLOOR (LOG (10, num))
                 )
            )     AS cooked_num
  FROM   my_tab;
  

  product

  RAW_NUM                        COOKED_NUM
  ------------------------------ ------------------------------
  22673.333550957921             22673.33355095792
  .0000000038002838659797923     .000000003800283865979792
  123456789012345678             123456789012345700
  

  To make handling you want, there is no need to convert to a string.
  To_char is located in the above query only to help see the complete number.

  Published by: Frank Kulash, October 31, 2008 16:55

  This assumes that num is positive: no positive arguments of NEWSPAPER are not allowed.
  For a work-aroumd, see Brian message (troisieme after this one).

• Significant digits instead of precision

  Hi all

  The hope that someone can make recommendations on my code.  I have a set of numeric values that I'm converting to strings in order to concatenate and spit into a text file.  I put 2 sensors, 1 front and 1 after conversion and cannot understand how get shaped to follow through.

  What you see on the 4 probe, is what I would like to see it out of the function or some other formatting function.  I could drop the precision to 0 on the function 'Fractional number chain' and he spits about what I want for this case.  However it will still not be an integer to the probe 4.  Some cases will be xyz.x - and if we put that to zero, then we loose as decimal.  (almost all of the values are decimal).

  Essentially, I just need to remove the trailing zeros as defined in the properties of each element of the cluster numberic display format.

  @for (imstruck):

  It looks like "%#.3f".

  Will spit on the answer that I've tried to get.  Thanks for the springboard!

• Rounding to a desired number of significant digits

  
  I have a set of calculated results I need to round to two significant figures.  The rounding rules that I need to use are 5 and above towers upward and below 5 laps down (I do not take into account or not the digit preceding the 5 is odd or even).  For example, I would need round etc. 0.04255 to 0.043 and 0.0255813953 to 0.026.  What is the best way to do it?

  Round (a, 3)

  ----

  Ramin Hashimzade

• Significant digits in the data file

  Is there a way to change the digits in a LVM data file? I use "write into the file of measures."

  Caveat! This will change the files in vi.lib. I suggest that you rename and move the affeted screws (don't blame me if other things break)

  Convert the express vi to a vi

  Drill here in the hierarchy

  

  Change this constant format specifier

  

• I bought 5 LightRoom on amazon (student version) and I got a product key witch is short 2 numbers. Had to get the last two digits of?

  I don't know if I should get the last two digits of

  Redemption help code #.

  Mylenium

• Read file vi spreadsheet rounds the number and shows figures for accuracy

  Hi guys,.

  I use a 'read the worksheet file vi fom' in a program to read a table, but it runs all the numbers in the table only with their significant digits. I need at least 6 digits for accuracy, but I really wasn't able to find the solution to. How could I adjust it? By the way, I didn't see any function setting in right-clicked "read spreadsheet.vi" both indicators table, even in their "Properties". I have attached the vi.

  Hi beginner,

  in your picture you only looked at the properties of the table. Need to look at the properties of digital indicators instead... DOH.

  The format string has been explained now.

  I would recommend using "%; %f' to play your files original (with the comma as decimal separator). Read the help for the format codes!

  Edit: I wouldn't call it 'solution' when I had to change all my textfiles before loading in LabVIEW...

• Limit the decimals

  For some values of less than one my data sheets of often list an appalling number of digits for the measured value. Is there a way to limit the significant digits or the fractional part numbers shown on the card? The preference would be to two digits to the right of the decimal point. I have a VI that will do, but do not want to filter each reading.

  Thank you

  JVH

  I know exactly what you're talking about, I had a lot of complaints about this operators wondering why a DMM measure out a few 10-digit precision.

  TestStand 4.0, click on your stage of numerical limit.  Click the tab limits, and then select the arrow next to the number Format drop-down list.  Select custom, this opens the window of Digital Format.  In here, you can select various options for the display of the data.  See the attachment for a page where I put 2 digits of precision.

  Thank you

  Paul Holztrichter

• How to convert numbers to the string with an optimal number of numbers?

  Hello.

  I'm doing something that seems just, and I wonder how much trouble I have with this.  I'm sure there is a way to get LabVIEW for this.

  I have a table of numbers (double), and I use the 'Worksheet picture String' function to generate a string that I can write to a file.

  The problem I have is I want to make the chain to omit useless zeros after the decimal point, but I don't want to limit the accuracy of the numbers that requires it.

  For example, if my data is as follows:

  0.02

  0.4476

  -0.0244570001

  I would like for the string I can be exactly like what I wrote above.  However, depeding on the format string that I use, that's what I get:

  format string: %.10f

  0.0200000000

  0.4476000000

  -0.0244570001

  format string: %f (it seems that by default 6 figures)

  0.020000

  0.447600

  -0.024457

  format string: %.4f

  0,0200

  0.4476

  -0.0244<= all="" trailing="" digits="" for="" this="" number="" have="" been="">

  Anyone know what the format string should be to get the string I want to (what is this

  0.02

  0.4476

  -0.0244570001

  Thanks in advance,

  Alejandro

  Hello Alejandro:

  Try %#f

• ORA-06502: PL/SQL: digital error or value: number too high accuracy

  Hi all
  Sorry I can't speak English very well
  ========
  IM creating a function in the hr schema
  I need to calculate a tax
  syntax of the function is
  
  CREATE OR REPLACE THE TAX FUNCTION
  (F_TAX EMPLOYEES % OF SALARY TYPE)
  RETURN NUMBER IS
  V_SAL EMPLOYEES. % SALARY TYPE.
  
  BEGIN
  SELECT salary * 12
  IN v_sal
  Employees
  WHERE EMPLOYEE_ID = F_TAX;
  IF V_SAL > = 40000 THEN
  V_SAL: = V_SAL / 0,20;
  ELSIF V_SAL > = 30000 THEN
  V_SAL: = V_SAL / 0.15;
  END IF;
  RETURN V_SAL;
  TAX END;
  ==================
  When I select a tax I have this problem
  SELECT (EMPLOYEE_ID) TAX
  EMPLOYEES
  
  It comes
  SELECT (EMPLOYEE_ID) TAX
  *
  ERROR on line 1:
  ORA-06502: PL/SQL: digital error or value: number too high accuracy
  ORA-06512: at "HR. The TAX", line 16

  V_SAL is declared as HR. EMPLOYEES. % OF SALARY TYPE. If you look at the definition of time. The table EMPLOYEES, the SALARY column is a NUMBER (8,2). This means that it can handle numbers up to $999,999.99 (8 total digits with 2 decimal places).

  Your IF statement is dividing the salary by 0.20, which is equivalent to multiplying by 5 or dividing by 0.15, which is multiplied by 6.67. In reality, at least a salary is high enough now that when you multiply by 5 or 6.67 it exceeds the limit of $999,999.99 (especially when you already multiplied by 12 SALARY column in your SELECT statement).

  -If your intention is to return in numbers that exceed the limits of the SALARY column in human resources. EMPLOYEES, you will need to declare V_SAL differently. You can declare V_SAL as a NUMBER (11.2), for example, given that any number that you store in a NUMBER (8.2), multiplied by 60, which can be represented in a NUMBER (11.2).
  -If your intention is to return the numbers that fall within the limits of the SALARY column in human resources. USED, I suspect that the algorithm that you implemented is incorrect. Perhaps, for example, you would divide by 1.2 or 1.15 as a kind of tax accounting?

  Justin

• Maximum limit for the number of periods loops that can be run at the same time?

  I am developing a simulator that requires many pieces of code to execute in parallel.  As a result, we were in loops just for this purpose.  I didn't count but there are close to 100 call loops that eventually run at a given time.

  A week ago, I've reached a point where the Simulator was working fine but when I added a more timed loop, it would break LabVIEW.  When I say LabVIEW crashed, I want to say there is no warnings that popped up, and LabVIEW just stopped completely.  Worse still, LabVIEW didn't offer even to recover the work when I start it back up again.  However, removing an additional timed loop allows everyone to work normally again.

  I'm under LabVIEW 2009 Version 9.0f3 (32 bit).  I have observed this behavior even on two different systems, one that is 3.2 GHz Xeon Quad-core with 2.0 GB of RAM, running Windows XP SP3 (32 bit) and the other is a 3.0 GHz AMD Athlon 64 Dual Core with 4.0 GB of RAM, running Windows 7 Professional (64 bit).

  Because the two systems are quite different, and LabVIEW appears to hang at the same point, I wonder if someone has already noticed such behavior.  I searched online and can't seem to find any reference to such a limit on call loops.

  One last thing.  I made an attempt to replace all the loops timed with while loops, but this seems to lead to some kind of hunger because the Simulator becomes suddenly jerky, without seeming to consume all resources more than when the call loops were in place.  So, which doesn't seem to be an option.

  I think that you are limited to 128 Timed loops in a system. Could not find anything by specifying that online, I am sure that I heard him. Also, the Sources Software-Triggered clock Timing loops can only be counted between 0-127.

  However, it certainly sounds like a bug that LabVIEW would crash during the approach of this limit rather than up a significant error.

  You can do some things to help avoid the unstable behaviour of the normal use of many parallels while loops. Place one or more loops in subVIs and then distribute these subVIs enforcement systems . This will give you your application with multiple threads of execution, which will reduce the ground being. If you don't do this, your curls probably all run System Standard of performance, which, by default, cannot have 8 wires at his disposal to share between all the loops.

• Workstation PC with full PCI (ie. 256) buses numbering?

  Hello!

  I have a problem with DELL Optiplex 7010 and two bodies SMU connected to it like this:

  Port of PC PCie8372 1-3 metres of cable-> SMU - 8370 >-> the 1 SMU-1065 chassis

  port 2-> 3 metres of cable-> SMU - 8370-> the 2 SMU-1075 chassis

  Problem is that in Windows nipxirfk event log service complained that "PCI Host Bridge: bus Maximum number limit reached before listing all devices, status =-313563 '.

  When I tried different things to solve the problem as withdrawal PCI GPIB bus and change SMU bodies on different ports on PCIe card, half of PC USB ports have stopped working and when I changed something the other half stops working

  PC has limited the availability of bus numbers:

  8< -="" -="" -="" -="" -="" -="" -="">

  = Detection of resources OR root Bus utility =.
  This utility determines the number of root PCI/PCI Express bus
  devices on your system and if there is any number of bus
  range limitations that could cause equipment problems.

  = SUMMARY =.
  Bus single root detected.
  Your system has a single root PCI bus.
  Bus root has a limited scope.
  The BIOS of your system has a limit on the number of bus range
  You can assign to your PCI tree. In Windows XP, this limit is ignored
  and has no effect. In Windows Vista and later versions, the limit is strictly
  applied and cannot be exceeded. Thus, the amount of MXI-Express
  You can reach the material is limited. Refer to the number of bus range
  below the limits of your system.

  = DETAILS =.

  -Root Bus: ACPI\PNP0A08\0 -.
  Bus numbers range: [0, 3]
  Status: Device is running

  This utility ran without error.

  8< -="" -="" -="" -="" -="" -="" -="">

  So I take is not enough PCI bus available on this PC to allocate sufficient resources for all connected devices. There is nothing BIO on bus PCI PC I could delete or nothing to what I could turn off, actually, I have to back PCI GPIB card and who will eat resources. The two bodies SMU are about half full of instruments and I need to add more than a few cards to one of them. PC BIOS is up to date. I was sort of the details with the support OR already, but they do not have solution. Our laboratory has two former HP/workstations DELL (is no longer available) with the limited numbering PCI bus that work with the same two bodies very well. I think that this problem is PC related BIOS and my computer is right on the limit of not working.

  Basically, I need to know a few current PC workstation, used successfully to control at least two 2 SMU bodies. If you could check you workstation PCI bus numbering capacity with this tool EITHER:

  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/BF84B75E08D2A7708625763B00670007?OpenDocument

  And display the results here, I would be very grateful.

  Jan,

  Some Dell BIOS have an option to set the number PCIe bus max.  A lower number allows more usable in a 32-bit operating system memory.  I saw him in some positions as the T3600 precision work.  On these machines, you access the BIOS and go to system Configurationoption"Configuration of the PCI Bus, and then change the value to something higher (such as 256).  Can you check for this option?

  -Robert