OpenSSL vulnerability software

Similar Questions

• MITM Dell idrac openssl vulnerability

  Hello

  Nessus allows us to analyze our network. My most recent scan reports several openssl vulnerabilitis with a cvss score of 9.3, (note: HIGH), see below for more details. Found products are affected:

  Reference Dell idrac6 1.97

  Dell idrac7 1.57.57

  Nessus says that the possibility is confirmed, and the openssl version could also be vulnerable to the other openssl release questions the same day as the OpenSSL ' ChangeCipherSpec' MiTM vulnerability"released on June 5.

  If this is confirmed by dell? patches will be released for this fault?

  CVE-2010-5298, CVE-2014-0076, CVE-2014-0195, CVE-2014-0198, CVE-2014-0221, CVE-2014-0224, CVE-2014-3470

  Here's what I received the answer from Dell to the Openssl vulnerability.

  After a few calls to the help desk here is what I get for my iDRAC7 fighting flag of Foundstone security for vulnerability CVE-2014-0224scans:

  "The package OPEN SSL used here contains several components, you do not use the component that is vulnerable and affected, other components in this package are used but are not vulnerable".

  "Dell has determined that the products listed in the attached document are not affected by the problems.  Some products generated a module OpenSSL older (but not vulnerable).  This could be marked by a scanner.  "Dell is currently working to update the modules on a version that will not be reported for these issues.

  I also tried to download the document, I hope I can be read or downloaded.

  If this post has helped you please note.

  Thank you

  2376.Dell - ResponseOpenSSLSecurityAdvisory_05_June_2014_final.pdf

• Fusion 5.0.4 and software/OpenSSL vulnerability - affected or not?

  Hi all

  My Parallels Desktop imploded, forcing me to start over, and I thought that now is the ideal time to move (back) to the merger, once and for all. A question for you guys (I hope a simple):

  I see that Fusion 6.0.3 is out to protect themselves against the Heartbleed, but there is no corresponding to 5.0.4 patch.

  This does mean that the vulnerability does not exist in earlier versions, or that there is and is simply not to be patched for older versions? Finances are tight, and I was hoping to just use my 5.0.4 existing license.

  Can I do it safely?

  Thank you!

  Fusion 5 is not affected by the problem of software.  See VMware KB: response to OpenSSL security issue CVE-2014-0160/CVE-2014-0346 a.k.a: 'Heartbleed'

  See you soon,.

  --

  Darius

• Updated HP Device Manager 4.6 SP3 (OpenSSL vulnerability)

  Hey!

  I installed the HP Device Manager 4.6 SP3 Upgrade and our resident shows Vulnerability Scanner that uses the Version of OpenSSL is vulnerable.

  Ssleay32.dll and libeay23.dll details yet also show they are version 0.9.8.24 and not 1.0.1i...

  I did all this trouble during the upgrade?

  I tried the process of installation/upgrade on 3 different machines now, and the version of the same thing on all the settings...

  All boards

  Thank you!

  Georg

  Hi, George,

  There is nothing wrong with your update. Update libssl was not included in SP3. Please go with service pack4 released 27 October for this security update.

  Concerning

  -Chen

• X7.2.3 VCS OpenSSL vulnerability

  Hi all

  CSCuo16472 (https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuo16472), we see that the vulnerability is fixed in X7.2.3 and X8.1.1.

  But in X7.2.3 covering memo, we cannot find any description about it. (In X8.1.1 we can find it).

  It's really fixed in X7.2.3?

  Best regards

  Kotaro

  Yes, it is set at X7.2.3 - it is mentioned very briefly buried on page 49 of the release notes where it says that it uses OpenSSL 1.0.1c patched for CVE-2014-0160.

• Winlogon, csrss duplicate restarts continuously

  I recorded a video of the show happening: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcQVGRy00vs

  You can see in the video that there is double csrss and winlogon reboot all the time.
  I also recorded the processes with procmon, but the log file is larger than 500 MB!
  I think that the conflict software it is, but I could be wrong. I've not found why exactly what is happening.
  All csrss and winlogon processes use the user 'NT\SYSTEM authority'.
  A scan with Microsoft security essentials and rescue disk Kaspersky returned 0 infection.
  Tool detecting Microsoft GDI + only reports "no vulnerable software.
  ran sfc/scannow a couple of times
  Operating system
  MS Windows XP Professional SP3 32-bit

  CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT

  AMD Athlon 64 3200 + 40 ° C

  Winchester 90nm technology

  RAM

  2.00 GB Dual-Channel DDR @ 166 MHz (2, 5-3-3-7)

  Motherboard

  ASUSTeK Computer Inc. A8V Deluxe (Socket 939) 40 ° C

  Graphics

  L1952TX (1280x1024@60Hz)

  128 MB GeForce 6800 GT (ASUStek Computer Inc.)

  Hard drives

  244GB Western Digital WDC WD25 00KS-00MJB0 SCSI Disk Device (SATA) 28 ° C

  244GB Seagate ST325082 3AS SCSI Disk Device (SATA) 31 ° C

  Optical drives

  SONY DVD RW DRU-820

  Audio

  ASUS Xonar DG peripheral Audio
  Graphics

  Monitor

  Name L1952TX on NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT

  Course resolution 1280 x 1024 pixels

  Work the resolution 1280 x 964 pixels

  Active state, primary, output devices support

  Width of the screen 1280

  Height of the screen 1024

  Monitor the BPP 32 bits per pixel

  Monitoring frequency 60 Hz

  Device \\.\DISPLAY1\Monitor0

  GeForce 6800 GT

  NV40 GPU

  Deviceid 10DE-0045

  Revision A2

  Subprovider ASUStek Computer Inc. (1043)

  Output current level 1

  GPU current clock 350 MHz

  Memory current clock 700 MHz

  130 nm technology

  Die size 287 nm²

  Transistors to 222 M

  Release date 2004

  Support for DirectX 9.0 c

  DirectX Shader Model 3.0

  OpenGL 2.0 support

  Bus AGP interface

  Opening AGP 128 MB

  Rate of the AGP 8 x

  GPU clock 350 MHz

  Memory clock 700 MHz

  Nv4_disp.dll Driver

  6.14.11.8208 driver version

  ForceWare 182.08 version

  5.40.02.15.00 BIOS version

  ROPs 8

  8/Pixel Vertex shaders 8

  Memory Type GDDR3

  128 MB memory

  256 Bit bus width

  Pixel Fillrate 2.8 GPixels/sec

  Texture Fillrate 2.8 GTexels/s

  44.8 GB/s bandwidth

  Number of performance levels: 1

  Level 0

  GPU clock 350 MHz

  Memory clock 700 MHz

  Hey people - I think I just found the answer (for me anyway):

  http://www.TomsHardware.com/Forum/267056-45-problem-Csrss-Winlogon-related

  I got RDP active (and port-forwarded through my router using port TCP 3389).  I disabled the port-forward and the process csrss and winlogon restarts immediately.  So basically, I got someone to try the RDP session openings on my machine.

  -Paul

• Question of vulnerability OpenSSL WALNUT

  Microsoft releases any patches for OpenSSL WALNUT cause of vulnerability

  Hello

  I suggest you post your query in the following TechNet forums to improve assistance in this regard.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Windows/en-us/home

  Thank you.

• Software Vulnerability

  Software vulnerability affects many websites, services, and devices including android devices. I used the lookout app that BGR is said to use to check your phone for the bug and he said that my motorcycle G is affected by the latter, so that means there will be an update soon urgent safety for users of bike G and X deal with this serious problem?

  http://BGR.com/2014/04/11/how-to-test-for-heartbleed-on-my-Android-phone/

  Hey - Vincent -,.

  Motorcycle G and Moto X are safe at HeartBleed so no worries there.

  I second neu-smurph.

  See you soon,.

  Nicole

• Linksys Smart Wi - Fi is vulnerable to the heart bleed OpenSSL

  I'm curious to know if the Linksys Smart Wi - Fi site or routers are vulnerable to the exploit of heart bleed OpenSSL?

  http://SiliconANGLE.com/blog/2014/04/08/OpenSSL-heartbleed-vulnerability-may-affect-millions/

  BTW: Change your passwords...

  FW_LICENSE_EA4500_v2.1.39.145204 - 3 - RainCAP_n.html construction

• Cisco IOS Software Internet Key Exchange vulnerability Enquiry

  Products affected

  Cisco IOS devices are vulnerable when you run a software image of an affected version of the Cisco IOS software that does not support the IKE version 2 (IKEv2) and is configured to use IKE version 1 (IKEv1).

  Vulnerable products

  This vulnerability affects Cisco IOS 15.1GC, 15.1 T software version trains and 15.1XB. No other Cisco IOS software release trains are affected.

  Ref: http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20130327-ike

  If we use "not affected (for example; version". 12.4, 15.0 releases)"and configured with IKE version1?  Can it be affected by this vulnerability?

  Subsys router #sh | include ikev2

  ikev2_cli_registry registry 1.000.001

  Thank you best regards &,.

  Ye

  You are not affected by this vulnerability.

  As described in the notice - "There is no affected 12.4 based rejection" and «There is no rejection of base affected 15.0»

• This version of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 9.6 (1) 5 is affected by Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance SNMP Remote Code execution vulnerability and Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance CLI Remote Code execution vulnerability of

  This version of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 9.6 (1) 5 is affected by Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance SNMP Remote Code execution vulnerability and Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance CLI Remote Code execution vulnerability of

  Hi vrian_colaba,

  You can take a look at cisco's Advisory here:

  https://Tools.Cisco.com/Security/Center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/CI...

  Fixed versions

  Cisco ASA Major Release	First version fixed
  7.2	Affected; migrate to 9.1.7(9) or later
  8.0	Affected; migrate to 9.1.7(9) or later
  8.1	Affected; migrate to 9.1.7(9) or later
  8.2	Affected; migrate to 9.1.7(9) or later
  8.3	Affected; migrate to 9.1.7(9) or later
  8.4	Affected; migrate to 9.1.7(9) or later
  8.5	Affected; migrate to 9.1.7(9) or later
  8.6	Affected; migrate to 9.1.7(9) or later
  8.7	Affected; migrate to 9.1.7(9) or later
  9.0	9.0.4 (40)
  9.1	9.1.7(9)
  9.2	9.2.4 (14)
  9.3	9.3.3 (10)
  9.4	9.4.3(8) ETA 26/08/2016
  9.5	9.5 (3) ETA 30/08/2016
  9.6 (DFT)	9.6.1 (11) / 6.0.1(2) FTD
  9.6 (ASA)	9.6.2

  5 9.6 (1) is not part of the fixed versions, this means that is assigned for the SNMP Remote Code execution vulnerability.

  Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance CLI Remote Code vulnerability to run you can also take a look at cisco's Advisory here:

  https://Tools.Cisco.com/Security/Center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/CI...

  Fixed versions

  The following table shows the first software versions that include fixes for this vulnerability (9.6 is not affected)

  Cisco ASA Major Release	First version fixed
  7.2	Affected, migrate to 8.4 (3) or later
  8.0	Affected, migrate to 8.4 (3) or later
  8.1	Affected, migrate to 8.4 (3) or later
  8.2	Affected, migrate to 8.4 (3) or later
  8.3	Affected, migrate to 8.4 (3) or later
  8.4	8.4 (3)
  8.5	Affected, migrate to 9.0 (1) or later version
  8.6	Affected, migrate to 9.0 (1) or later version
  8.7	Affected, migrate to 9.0 (1) or later version
  9.0	9.0 (1)
  9.1	Not affected
  9.2	Not affected
  9.3	Not affected
  9.4	Not affected
  9.5	Not affected
  9.6	Not affected

  Hope this info helps!

  Note If you help!

  -JP-

• This version of 5.5 U1 is vulnerable to the software? 1892794

  Hello

  I saw that there is a patch for 5.5 U1 to HeartBleed (ESXi550-201404001), we run build 1892794.  Research on the portal of the patch, this contains the following hotfixes:

  ESXi550-201407405-BG

  KO 2077411

  Critical bug fix

  Esx-base updates

  ESXi550-201407401-BG

  KO 2077407

  Critical bug fix

  Tools-light updates

  ESXi550-201407403-BG

  KO 2077409

  Fixed an Important bug

  Misc-drivers updates

  ESXi550-201407402-BG

  KO 2077408

  Fixed an Important bug

  Megaraid sas scsi updates

  ESXi550-201407404-BG

  KO 2077410

  Fixed an Important bug

  Esx-base updates

  ESXi550-201407101-SG

  KO 2077414

  Criticism of security

  Tools-light updates

  ESXi550-201407102-SG

  2077415 KB

  Important safety

  This suggests that the patch is NOT included in this version, but I learned that some of these bugs are cumulative and include patches.  Which is correct?

  Thank you

  Hello Dan,.

  Yes VMware fixes are cumulative so with build 1892794 you are already patched for the vulnerability of the software.

  Patch ESXi550-201404001 will take you to the version 1746018 which are already on the vulnerability of HB.

  Patch ESXi550-201404020 will take you to the version 1746974 which are already on the vulnerability of HB.

  ESXi 5.5 Patch 2	2014-07-01	1892794	Ok
  ESXi 5.5 Patch Express 4	2014 06-11	1881737	Ok
  ESXi 5.5 Update 1 has	2014-04-19	1746018	Ok
  ESXi 5.5 Express Patch3	2014-04-19	1746974	Ok
  ESXi 5.5 Update 1	2014 03-11	1623387	Vulnerable

  For the latest security patches, see this article:

  VMware KB: Security of VMware connection guidelines for ESXi and ESX

  So if you want the latest patch of security (for ESXi 5.5) go to the Patch ESXi550-201410101-SG this will update only the VIB esx-base and bring your host to the build 2093874.

  Or update the image with Patch version ESXi550-201410001 (including SG above) which will bring you to the last build real 2143827. (5.5 Patch3 ESXi)

• Panda Global 2013 reports anti-virus software constantly KB915597 MS is a vulnerability.

  This KB915597 has been downloaded 6 or more times during the month. My anti-virus Panda Global 2013 always says me it's a security risk.  Please help me remove these entries.

  I have read reports online that it is very dangerous.  I also get Wi - Fi intrusion so please stop downloading this KB915597.  AND I WANT TO SAY STOP IT DOWNLOAD!  Provide a method of permanent removal and permanent no-download of the tool of this intruder!

  Thu.

  I am not sure, but isn't KB915597 updates for Defender? ( http://support.microsoft.com/kb/915597 ). If so and you have a complete AV/Spyware of the product running, then perhaps you should not advocate as well. I do not advocate as I installed MSE which will turn off automatically.

  If this is the case, check whether the Defender is running and if so, try to turn it off and see what happens. But only if you're happy that Panda AV meets your requirements.

  To disable the Defender - open Action Center, security. When checking the article "software and spyware unwanted protection ' Panda is listed and that its on. In the 'show installed anti-spyware programs' Defender is listed, and it is on? If so, try turning it off. (At least a criterion).

• The OpenSSL software patches have rolled to all the latest full versions 5.5?

  This should be easy, even if I can't find anything definitive on the vmware site.

  Thank you!

  Ron

  Yes, software fixes have been made to ESXi 5.5. Reference kB - http://kb.vmware.com/kb/2076665

• Mozilla has a similar plugin for the Chrome browser plugin which will alert users when they visit a Web site that is still vulnerable to software?

  The browser plugin has been mentioned on the BGR site today. Looks like a valid addition unless the issue is addressed in another way.

  There is now an add-on Firefox equivalent:

  • https://addons.Mozilla.org/firefox/addon/foxbleed/