Optimized file records * much * bigger than the said fireworks will be

Similar Questions

• The size of the file using Premiere pro CC 2014 exported media is much more important than the estimate, is also much bigger than the first CS 6?

  I used the preset H, 264 1080HD Youtube to export video. The estimated size is MB 7308. {(après que je réduis le nitrate)} The final size is 11,18 GB.

  Why are so many different things? Befor I use the CS6 first for size simial use the same export format is about 6 GB.

  Firstly, the estimated file size just an estimate based primarily on a combination of bitrate and duration. The actual size can vary considerably, in large part on the amount of change from image to image throughout the video. For example, if you encode two clips for a period identical to exactly the same settings, the only difference being the nature of the content - say on is an interview with talking head shot with the camera locked on a tripod, while the other is images skateboard turned into pocket - size of the two files of outputs that result will be widely divergent.

  As for the comparison between CS6 and CC2014, note that the settings for the presets have been changed. For example, YouTube 1080 h.264 presets ranged from 8Mbps to 16.

• Does anyone else have a problem with the left speaker is much lower than the right?

  Any source that I use the left speaker is much lower than the left. If I put my finger on the right I can feel the pressure of air pushed but not by the left. Is it an iPhone defective 7?

  Hello, TopDog16!

  Welcome to congratulations on getting a new iPhone and Apple support communities 7.  From what I see in your post, you have any questions on the stereo speakers in your new iPhone.  I would be happy to help you with that!

  Indeed, your iPhone has holes on both right and left sides on the lower edge (on each side of the connector of the Lightning).  The holes on the right are only speaker on this edge of the phone, however.  The other speaker in the pair is at the top of the phone, where the cut is, just above the screen.  Check here to see if sound comes out.

  This page has a large diagram of the iPhone of 7 speakers (in the section entitled "Buttons and external connectors"): iPhone 7 - technical specifications

  Have a great rest of your week!

• When I opened my favorites fall down and he is bigger than the window of Firefox and I click on a bookmark bookmark fall down closes, but remains a ghost image

  When I opened my favorites drop down and he is bigger than the window of Firefox, and I click on a bookmark bookmark dropdown closes, but a ghost of the part of the bookmark image that is outside the window of firefox on the office remains, by pressing F5 to refresh the screen it will erase, but shouldn't have to do that. Using the latest version of Firefox (15)

  Try disabling hardware acceleration in Firefox.

  • Tools > Options > advanced > General > Browsing: "use hardware acceleration when available.
  • https://hacks.Mozilla.org/2010/09/hardware-acceleration/
  • https://support.Mozilla.org/KB/how-do-i-upgrade-my-graphics-drivers

• Hooked up to my new Dell pc and using my 24 "ASUS monitor, the screen is bigger than the screen.

  Original title: control adjustment

  I just plugged my new Dell pc.  I use my 24 "ASUS monitor.  The screen is bigger than the screen, i.e. the edges of the screen are cut.  I swear... I screwed up along with all the options and I can't seem to turn up!  I can't even get the buttons on the control panel of monitor pass (just straight up & down!)  Anyone?  Thank you, Trish

  Hi Trish,

  What is the exact model of the Dell PC and Asus monitor number?

  You can try the following steps and check if it helps:

  Method 1:

  We can refer to the website of the manufacturer of device computer\ and try to install the latest version of the drivers for the graphics card and the monitor. Check if it helps.

  Asus support

  Dell support

  For more information, see the article:

  Update drivers: recommended links

  Method 2:

  Check if the screen resolution is configured properly.

  See the article and check if that helps:

  Change your screen resolution

  Get the best display on your monitor

• bigger than the Lightroom screen

  Somehow Lightroom CC got bigger than the screen on my computer Windows 10. Because Adobe does not implement the usual Windows controls in Lightroom CC, I have no way to bring Lightroom to the size of the screen.

  How can I restore Lightroom CC not to exceed the dimensions of the screen?

  Thank you, J.R.

  Hi J.R. Link,.

  Go to preferences in Lightroom, then on the Interface tab.

  Please change the font size, restart Lightroom.

  Let me know if it helps.

  Kind regards

  Tanuj

• Much smaller than the original file size

  When I import a picture of 4MB, and then save it, it seems that the size of the image is about 100 k or less? How to avoid them shrink the file so much? Is there a default size of the project or something?

  Hi howebizarre,

  PS Touch support to work with images to the maximum dimensions of 1600 x 1600, who once saved as a JPEG with a quality higher still in the vicinity of 1 MB. You resize the images to work within the correct software? I would recommend making sure that you have installed the 1.1.1 update too, she understood some updates to save the settings of quality higher when recording to the tablet.

  Hope that helps,

  -Dave

• TimesTen 11.2.2.5.0 - backup (.bacxyz) files created by the ttBackup much larger than the data store

  Hello

  have a question about the files generated by the internal ttBackup utility on our systems.

  We have a pair of storage of data replicated with DS following sizes on disk in a two-way manner:

  -rw - rw - 1 timesten, timesten 48922624 24 August at 12:45 tt41data.ds0

  -rw - rw - 1 timesten, timesten 48922624 24 August at 13:00 tt41data.ds1

  -rw - rw - 1 timesten, timesten 38895616 24 August at 12:46 tt41data.ds0

  -rw - rw - 1 timesten, timesten 38895616 24 August 12:31 tt41data.ds1

  Looking at the backup files generated via /ttBackup - force - dir xxx

  You can see on the first:

  -rw - 1 timesten, timesten 48922624 24 August at 12:34 tt41data.0.bac

  -rw - 1 timesten, timesten 720 24 August at 12:34 tt41data.sta

  -rw - 1 timesten, timesten 475060224 24 August at 12:34 tt41data.0.bac245

  While on the second:

  -rw - 1 timesten, timesten 38895616 24 August at 12:34 tt41data.0.bac

  -rw - 1 timesten, timesten 83904512 24 August at 12:34 tt41data.0.bac248

  -rw - 1 timesten, timesten 720 24 August at 12:34 tt41data.sta

  So while the .bac file is consistent with the size of the DS on the disk, the bacxyz shows a huge difference on the second case.

  Undersand it is an internal utility, but I would like to understand the significance of this file, did not find much in the documentation.

  Also tried using - type streamFull and the generated files differs for a factor of 4 x.

  Check the number of tuples, they are pretty much the same thing, as the ds size seems to imply, but cannot understand the enormous size of the file bac.xxx on the second node, what is the significance of this file?

  Thanks in advance!

  
  Mike

  The .bac file is essentially a copy of the most recent checkpoint file (ds0/ds1) while the .bacxyz file is a single file that is a fusion of all the files (tt41data.lognnnnnn files) transaction logs needed to recover from this checkpoint file. So depending on the State of your database (in terms of number of log files present on the drive and which of them are actually required) by the time you take the backup of the file .bacxyz can vary in size from very small to very large. If you want to make sure the file .bacxyz has the smallest possible size, you must issue a checkpoint manually, and wait until it finishes before running the ttBackup command.

  Chris

• Why disable SuperFetch on ssd, if the RAM is much faster than the ssd?

  Directed by Microsoft that SuperFetch and PreFetch must be disabled, if the OS is installed on an ssd, in accordance with article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2727880. But SuperFetch is used for loading the data components of applications, which were very often used for RAM. Although the ssd is faster that a hard drive is not faster than the RAM. So, I do not understand why Microsoft suggest disabling this feature. The only reason why I want to understand, it's because of a limited RAM. If the RAM is sufficient beyond 6 GB, if we disable SuperFetch, then the boot time and increase the loading time of most used applications. I miss something here?

  The other question is about PreFetch. I feel, maybe wrong, it does the same thing with SuperFetch, with one major difference. It loads all the information data on the ssd or hard drive, instead of the RAM, in order to accelerate the launch of applications and time when the OS is installed on a hard drive to boot. If I'm right, let's disable the PreFetch it stores information for one ssd or hdd, while SuperFetch stores data of RAM information, which is much faster and so it must be enabled if there is a sufficient RAM.

  I look forward to reading the notice of a Microsoft software engineer.

  Hi Leventis,

  Prefetch copies frequently accessed files together into a contiguous on the disk area so that they can be located and loaded more quickly. That it takes a lot of old drives to recover data faster.

  SuperFetch predict what applications you run next and preload all the necessary data in the memory. She has also done that with startup files. And for all the three days he sends a defragmentation command to the OS drive that will cause problems in the SSD drives.

  In traditional hard drives (HDD) data are scattered throughout the disk, so that the operating system for access, it will take more time. It is suggested to perform a disk defragmentation. But storage technology is different in SSD, where, it records the data dynamically and it recovers more quickly. Who will be low down the burden on the RAM and the RAM can be used for uses such as for the opening of the games graphics high-end, etc..

  Hope this information is useful.

• Lightroom displays files and exports darker than the original or Photoshop files

  Hi all.

  Let me first preface this by saying I'm not technical interest, and I know nothing (or very little) of CHF etc. profiles.

  But suppose a person will try to tell me to do something with them in a really technical way that I don't understand, please treat me like a child of 4 years in this regard.

  I use Lightroom 5.6 on a Mac under 10.9.4 I Photoshop CS6 and fitted with a calibration Spyder 3pro device and all the Adobe programs linked to the exit of calibration to ensure 'if all is well' quality control.

  I recently was analog film scanning and this import in Lightroom 5. I noticed that the file import always seems darker than the original.

  When I exported from Lightroom, them they look like shit.

  There were no imports of additional parameters because they are all extinct. I did when I installed LR.

  I also noticed that whenever I imported a Raw file for some reason, on the original file would look great for a second then when clicked would change to something less attractive. But I digress.

  So try to show what's happening. I created some images to illustrate my problem.

  Also, it doesn't matter if I turn the proofing or disable.

  Lightroom Softproof on

  

  Lightroom Softproof off

  

  Vs Lightroom Photoshop histogram - very similar

  

  Left: file opened from Lightroom as the Original right: original Photoshop file

  

  Left: file open an export from Lightroom right: original Photoshop file

  

  Clues because it is very annoying and yet 5 Lightroom unusable.

  These files are probably in grayscale without an included icc profile. Photoshop, using the parameters that show you will pay 15% dot gain profile. Lightroom assumes the sRGB which is much more mixed. You can see this difference in the massively different histograms. What you need to do is save the file from Photoshop with included icc profile. Lightroom should display the same.

  Note a bug of color management nasty exist in Lightroom on Mavericks in the Panel to develop: Jao photo blog: quantification of the problem of management of the Mavericks color also which make the deep shadows Cap upward.

• The repeated CFC function call is much slower than the UDF version

  For a project, we were faced with unexpected behavior of a CFC. Without going to much into the details of the project, it boils down to the following: when we run through a set of records, say 100 and apply a function to this topic, the overhead is 4-5 seconds extra when we call it a component instantiated (only once) compared to when code us as a UDF. Since our application can process thousands of records in 1 past the overload will quickly over 100 seconds compared to the UDF.

  I was wondering if there is no logical explanation for this behavior. From what I understand a function called from a component should not add any notable overload after the component was instantiated.

  Our installation is an installation of Coldfusion 8 Jrun running on Linux. We didn't really find anything on the web documenting this (or we found we have said that there will be no additional charge). We could modify the function call to a call from the UDF, but we prefer to keep in a CFC as there are more things behind the scenes that just formatted data.

  B.

  HA!  Cool!!! I think I solved it something, I feel so proud.

  I run the code of Adam and the first time I ran it I got similar to Biebel3 results.  But it's curious, I got the output of debug it showing that it wasn't show where the time was spent.  He would show almost two full seconds to build the page of CFCS, but the components in the table of debugging only added up to about 50 milliseconds.

  I tired first put a top of the page of CFC, but that has not changed the results.  Because even if you do not display the results, ColdFusion still satisfied the debug output.  I went into the administrator and effectively disabled the debugging feature.

  Alto, I started to have the results displayed by Adam.

  It seems that it is a question where it takes a lot of overhead for ColdFusion compile a record of debugging for each call of CFC in this large loop.

  The good news, this is a pretty easy solution for a production system.

• Why the 2d graphics score is much lower than the 3d

  upper graphical desktop score is significantly lower than any other partition on the windows experience index. The index is just a waste of time or is there a reason for this 1 score to be much lower

  upper graphical desktop score is significantly lower than any other partition on the windows experience index. The index is just a waste of time or is there a reason for this 1 score to be much lower

  The score is less on your computer because your video (graphics) card was obviously designed for its 3D graphics was paramount while 2D was a secondary function.  (You have a game system).

  What specific video card do you have?

• 'Save for Web' vector adapts to the bigger than the jury of art?

  Heya,

  In the past, if I wanted a vector drawing to save for Web to a different size I create a new Council of art to a larger size, copy the drawing and it intensified. Then save for web, this new work plan.

  However I have noticed that I can increase the Save for the size of the Web image at greater than the size of the artboard - this automatically to vector drawings scale? Or he will zoom just in a raster image?

  It seems scaling vectors, which is great and will allow me to save a lot of time, but I wanted to check?

  Thank you

  Theo,

  You get as well a raster by definition x pixel image size in pixels in the window to the size of the Image.

  This is also where you can check Art (or Type, whichever is more relevant) optimized.

• Snapshots can become bigger than the initial allocation of virtual disk.

  Never this fix?  The main reason I don't like not instant is that ESX allows break at the limit of allocated disk space...

  Hello

  Catch instant formerly FIFO files a bit as the REDO logs. Then Yes, they could grow larger than the disc. They changed that to a file that contains only changed blocks (a block card) so not only got things more quickly, but also cannot grow larger than the main VMDK.

  The snapshots are not at all dangerous to use, but they take some precautions when using them. Suffers from too many clichés and performance. I've seen cases where the snapshot has caused network outages. However, for software upgrades and very controlled use, they are absolutely wonderful.

  I have attention for how long my VMs use snapshots and those who currently use them for what I do, it is a diligence that will help you to maintain a system of production running smoothly. In the case automatically commit snapshots, I rather does not have this feature just in case everything I was doing required longer than the allotted time. For example, it may take more than 72 hours to completely test a complex task.

  Best regards
  Edward L. Haletky
  VMware communities user moderator
  ====
  Author of the book ' VMWare ESX Server in the enterprise: planning and securing virtualization servers, Copyright 2008 Pearson Education.
  Blue gears and SearchVMware Pro items - top of page links of security virtualization - Security Virtualization Round Table Podcast

• Play the music of Dell Inspiron 15R sounds much worse than the game of Apple devices. How can I fix?

  I just bought Logitech Z506 speakers for listening to music from my laptop and the audio seems not as good as when my friend plug the speakers on his iPhone or Mac computer. The bass is much worse and the melody and singing is weak. Overall it sounds low coming from my laptop.

  I tried updating my drivers intel and nothing came of it. I am trying to update my realtek hd audio drivers this driver seems to come from the 21/08/2013, that seems to be old, but I don't know if it's going to do anything.

  The Inspiron 15R is supplied with a software called Dell Audio with MaxxAudio that controls the settings of. I do not know if that interferes with anything.

  Acesonnall

  I tried updating my drivers intel and nothing came of it. I am trying to update my realtek hd audio drivers this driver seems to come from the 21/08/2013, that seems to be old, but I don't know if it's going to do anything.

  You can switch backwards between your Realtek audio driver and the native audio driver Windows in this way:

  1. open Device Manager (type devmgmt.msc in the start search box and press ENTER).
  2. develop the 'audio controllers, video & game' and right click on "Realtek High Definition Audio".
  3 Select this option to "Update driver software".
  4. click on "Browse my computer for driver software".
  5. click on "Let Me pick from a list of drivers on my computer".
  6. put the "Show compatible hardware" check box if not already checked.
  7. in the list of devices, click on 'High Definition Audio"(native driver).
  8. click on "next".
  9. in the update driver warning box, click 'Yes' (the driver).
  10 restart the portable computer if you are prompted. If not invited, so no need to restart.
  [To return to the Realtek driver, do it again but reverse the names in steps 1-6.]

  Acesonnall

  The Inspiron 15R is supplied with a software called Dell Audio with MaxxAudio that controls the settings of. I do not know if that interferes with anything.

  You should be able to disable these software or try different settings. Also try "Disable all improvements" by opening the playback of the sound properties, right-click on the speakers and click Properties, then select the enhancements tab and put a check mark in the box to turn it off.

  Acesonnall

  Inspiron 15R

  Then it should be one of these models: Inspiron 5520, 5521, 5537, N5110, or SE 7520.