Optimizing JPEGs for the Web results in red cast...

Similar Questions

• save multiple files for the web in JPEG max at a resolution of 800%

  I had more than 200 created illustrator files. They all have the same dimensions. I wanted an adobe illustrator script that saves all files for the web in jpeg.

  Export options must be max.resolution of all files should be increased to 800%.

  I think it's the reasoning

  Open a folder with all the files

  loop through each file

  Save for web each in jpeg format to the quality of resolution and up to 800%

  the names of all jpeg files should be the same from these illustrator files (if possible)

  I will be very thankful to you if you could help me

  Best regards,

  Hassan Ali

  As far as I understand your request it is also possible with a simple action in batch mode.

• Color changes during the recording of the PSD to JPEG (safe for the web) in PS CS5 working in sRGB

  As I secured it for the web a PSD file, jpeg version of the same file changes slightly color - I opened the two files in PS CS5 to compare.

  File initially processed in Lightroom 6 and converted to sRGB for export.

  I worked in the sRGB color space in Photoshop.

  When exporting I secured for the web. I tried both options checked including the color profile and convert to sRGB.

  I tried to save to the web as a PNG and color remained the same, she only moves for JPEG files.

  You can't really see the difference in color with a naked eye, but be specific. I don't understand why he would change when I work in the color space is sRBG. Please help this is driving me crazy!

  JPEG compression can change the values, even quite spectacular on single pixel level. You have the selector of color set to "sample point"?

• Save two-dimensional image od for the web

  Hello

  I made the script (with your help ) to export images for the web with dimensions 300 x 300 px. Now, I want my script to resize more than files that I get two files one 300 x 300 and another 66 x 66 px. I'll post my script and you ask hel find me the bug

  And another question. My script exports the file name + jpg, but it also keeps orginal extension if I get IE. FileName.psd.jpg

  can you help me solve this in my script... else is very well...

  Thank you

  Voah

  Edit:

  At the time of meen I managed to solve the problem, so here's the new script

  But I still have one thing I want to do. I have to manually do folder "300 x 300 and '66 x 66' or my script stops." How coud I do this script make sure files? (inputFolder/300 x 300 / and inputFolder/66 x 66 /)

  Save current preferences dialog

  var startDisplayDialogs = app.displayDialogs;

  Save preferences of current unit

  var originalRulerUnits = preferences.rulerUnits;

  preferences.rulerUnits = Units.PIXELS;

  var inputFolder is Folder.selectDialog ("select input file");.

  var outputFolder is Folder.selectDialog ("select output folder");.

  ProcessImages();

  function ProcessImages() {}

  var filesOpened = 0;

  If (inputFolder == null | outputFolder == null)

  {

  If (inputFolder == null) {}

  Alert ("no source folder selected");

  }

  If (outputFolder == null) {}

  Alert ("no output folder selected");

  //      }

  }

  else {}

  List of files of the var = inputFolder.getFiles ();

  for (var i = 0; i < fileList.length; i ++) {}

  If (instanceof file in the list of files [i] & &! fileList [i] .hidden) {}

  Open (fileList [i]);

  ResizeImage();

  filesOpened ++;

  }

  // }

  }

  Return filesOpened;

  }

  function ExportPng (filePrefix, fileSuffix) {}

  Try

  {

  var app.activeDocument = docRef;

  var Nomdoc = app.activeDocument.name.slice (0, -4);

  saveOptions var = new ExportOptionsSaveForWeb();

  saveOptions.quality = 70;

  saveOptions.format = SaveDocumentType.JPEG;

  saveOptions.optimized = true;

  docRef.exportDocument(File(app.activeDocument.path+'/300x300//'+docName+'.jpg'), ExportType.SAVEFORWEB, saveOptions);

  }

  catch (e)

  {

  Alert ("error when you try to save the image.") \r\r"+ e);

  return;

  }

  };

  funkcija export 2

  function ExportPng2 (filePrefix, fileSuffix) {}

  Try

  {

  var app.activeDocument = docRef;

  var Nomdoc = app.activeDocument.name.slice (0, -4);

  saveOptions var = new ExportOptionsSaveForWeb();

  saveOptions.quality = 70;

  saveOptions.format = SaveDocumentType.JPEG;

  saveOptions.optimized = true;

  docRef.exportDocument(File(app.activeDocument.path+'/66x66//'+docName+'.jpg'), ExportType.SAVEFORWEB, saveOptions);

  }

  catch (e)

  {

  Alert ("error when you try to save the image.") \r\r"+ e);

  return;

  }

  };

  ResizeImage() function

  {

  If (app.documents.length > 0) {}

  var app.activeDocument = docRef;

  var n = docRef.pathItems.length;

  If ((n>0) & & (docRef.pathItems [0] .name! = "Work path")) {}

  docRef.pathItems [0] .makeSelection ();

  docRef.selection.invert ();

  docRef.selection.clear ();

  docRef.selection.deselect ();

  }

  };

  function fitImage() {}

  var app.activeDocument = docRef;

  docRef.trim)

  var docWidth = docRef.width.as ("px");

  var docHeight = docRef.height.as ("px");

  If (docWidth / docHeight > 4.8)

  {

  docRef.rotateCanvas (315)

  docRef.trim)

  }

  ElseIf (docHeight / docWidth > 4.8)

  {

  docRef.rotateCanvas (45)

  docRef.trim)

  }

  If (docWidth < docHeight)

  {

  docRef.resizeImage (undefined, UnitValue(270,"px"), 72, ResampleMethod.BICUBIC)

  }

  ElseIf (docWidth > docHeight)

  {

  docRef.resizeImage (UnitValue (270, "px"), undefined, 72, ResampleMethod.BICUBIC)

  }

  Else if (docWidth == docHeight)

  {

  docRef.resizeImage (UnitValue(270,"px"), UnitValue(270,"px"), 72, ResampleMethod.BICUBIC)

  }

  docWidth = docRef.width.as ("px");

  docHeight = docRef.height.as ("px");

  If (docWidth < docHeight)

  {

  docRef.resizeCanvas (UnitValue(300,"px"), UnitValue(300,"px"), AnchorPosition.MIDDLECENTER);

  }

  ElseIf (docWidth > docHeight)

  {

  docRef.resizeCanvas (UnitValue(300,"px"), UnitValue(300,"px"), AnchorPosition.MIDDLECENTER);

  }

  Else if (docWidth == docHeight)

  {

  docRef.resizeCanvas (UnitValue(300,"px"), UnitValue(300,"px"), AnchorPosition.MIDDLECENTER);

  }

  };

  var app.activeDocument = docRef;

  var docRef.activeHistoryState = savedState;

  fitImage();

  app.displayDialogs = DialogModes.NO;

  ExportPng (file ('.jpg ',' '))

  docRef.resizeImage (UnitValue(66,"px"), UnitValue(66,"px"), 72, ResampleMethod.BICUBIC);

  ExportPng2 (file ('.jpg ',' '))

  docRef.close (SaveOptions.DONOTSAVECHANGES);

  docRef = null;

  }

  Reset the application preferences

  app.displayDialogs = startDisplayDialogs;

  preferences.rulerUnits = originalRulerUnits;

  Does that help?

  main();
  function main(){
  var originalRulerUnits = preferences.rulerUnits;
  preferences.rulerUnits = Units.PIXELS;
  var inputFolder = Folder.selectDialog("Select the input folder");
  if(inputFolder == null) return;
  var fileList = inputFolder.getFiles(/\.(jpg|tif|psd|png)$/i);
  var outputFolder1 = Folder(inputFolder + "/300x300");
  if(!outputFolder1.exists) outputFolder1.create();
  var outputFolder2 = Folder(inputFolder + "/66x66");
  if(!outputFolder2.exists) outputFolder2.create();
  for (var a in fileList){
  open(fileList[a]);
  var Name = decodeURI(activeDocument.name).replace(/\.[^\.]+$/, '');
  app.activeDocument.trim(TrimType.TRANSPARENT);
  FitImage(300,300);
  var saveFile = File(outputFolder1 + "/" + Name + ".jpg");
  SaveForWeb(saveFile,70);
  FitImage(66,66);
  var saveFile = File(outputFolder2 + "/" + Name + ".jpg");
  SaveForWeb(saveFile,70);
  app.activeDocument.close(SaveOptions.DONOTSAVECHANGES);
  }
  preferences.rulerUnits = originalRulerUnits;
  }
  function FitImage( inWidth, inHeight ) {
   var desc = new ActionDescriptor();
   var unitPixels = charIDToTypeID( '#Pxl' );
   desc.putUnitDouble( charIDToTypeID( 'Wdth' ), unitPixels, inWidth );
   desc.putUnitDouble( charIDToTypeID( 'Hght' ), unitPixels, inHeight );
   var runtimeEventID = stringIDToTypeID( "3caa3434-cb67-11d1-bc43-0060b0a13dc4" );
   executeAction( runtimeEventID, desc, DialogModes.NO );
  }
  function SaveForWeb(saveFile,jpegQuality) {
  var sfwOptions = new ExportOptionsSaveForWeb();
     sfwOptions.format = SaveDocumentType.JPEG;
     sfwOptions.includeProfile = false;
     sfwOptions.interlaced = 0;
     sfwOptions.optimized = true;
     sfwOptions.quality = jpegQuality;
  activeDocument.exportDocument(saveFile, ExportType.SAVEFORWEB, sfwOptions);
  }
  

• Best video for the Web?

  I created a site offering artists around my city. The most important thing is the videos and that's what I have a problem with. Can you help me?

  I started with the flv files swf turned and who was allowed. The problem was he wouldn't play on IPAD and other devices.

  So, I read online that a mov or mp4 file was good. Today, I received so many responses from those who said that the video is so slow that they have not even watch.

  I tried to increase my size to a size close to youtube, so it was more visible then my first posts.

  The site is

  www.adamsstreetsessions.com

  Thanks in advance

  . FLV is currently the best format of video container for the Web...

  As a rescue use swfobject for Flash detection and provide a .mov as ALT content file

  Link to swfobject:

  http://code.Google.com/p/SWFObject/

  Sample .flv video that plays on the iPhone:

  http://www.cidigitalmedia.com/tutorials/Qt/play_qt.html

  relief is .mov file. View the source code to see how it works.

  A potential problem of slow download .mov files is if the moov atom is at the end of the file rather than the beginning... Hey, I don't do this kind of things, I just tell you about it. The download is not slow, it's just that the entire file has download before he plays. If the moov atom is at the end of the file, the full .mov file must be downloaded before the video starts to play. It will be not progressive download as an .flv file (another reason why .flv is the video container of choice).

  You can restructure the .mov files are needed by using QuickTime Pro, and save as.

  Google to know the exact details or check here:

  https://www.ezs3.com/members/login.cfm?hpage=Checking_Metadata_or_Moov_Atom_Location.cfm

  If the video bitrate and/or the size is a problem, investigate it to an old post:

  Video bitrate

  One of the principle of goal setting is to "begin with the end in mind". In this case, it will be very difficult to give good recommendations because the end is not defined. So I'll just make a few assumptions and you can correct me if necessary.
  First, I'll assume that you convert Flash, whether you want to broadcast this video on the Internet. If that's true, then going to make some assumptions about your potential viewers Internet connection download speeds. Let's just say that most have at least a 1.5 MB connection or faster.
  OK, that would mean that a video bitrate of half that generally provide a video download that is not interupped by the buffering (most of the time anyway). So assuming a video bitrate of 750 kbps, what would be the optimal display size?
  Before decide us, here's a little info on the bitrate. To read more high quality, the bitrate of the video is directly related to the size of the screen. In other words, more display, incoming data more are needed to correctly display the video. Think of bitrate in terms of a can of paint. If you have 1 quart of paint, you might be able to do a very nice job on an area of 32 X 24 feet. But if you try to stretch the same amount of paint on a surface area of 64 X 48 feet, the coverage is not as good and you get mediocre results.
  Similarly, a video display to 640 X 480 pixels will require 4 times the baud rate as a video displayed at 320 X 240 pixels to produce the same quality. Thus, for example, a video with a speed of 100 kbps, 160 X 120 displayed will produce the same quality results as a video with a bitrate of 1600 kb/s is displayed in 640 X 480.
  So, to sum it all, 750 Kbps, even up to 1000 kbps video rates can usually get delivered high-speed Internet on most connections. Higher rates may work for connections very fast but will cause problems for viewers with slower connections. Video display size has a direct impact on the final quality. In the range of 750 to 1000 Kbps, display size should be maintained around 450 or 500 width max (and whatever the height proportions claims). Yes it can be displayed larger, but the quality will suffer.
  Sounds like the audio settings are fine, especially for delivery on the Internet.
  Regarding the framerate, maintain the framerate video original raw for best results. Therefore, if the clip was shot at 24 frames per second, let him.
  In regards to video converters, you have the Flash 8 Video Converter? It works very well for the video to be delivered over the Internet. Don't forget, you're taking a Cadillac of video (h.264 HD) version and cram into a Chevy body so he can work on the Internet.

  Best wishes

  Adninjastrator

• Prep file InDesign for the web.

  PSCS5, Mac OS 10.6.4

  I need to prepare a book cover created in InDesign display with online sellers (Angus & Roberton, Austraila, and Amazon for beginners). My first attempt and prepare the InD file for the web has failed. No file is available from each provider. Can you help me?

  The InD file is 8 "x 8", contains 2 images, 2 vectors of I and PS text. " PS files are set at 350 dpi (by record the print service bureau). The book is intended for the wet press 4 colours. The first set of wet proofs are superb, so I know I'm on the right track with color, related, etc. images management.

  My first approach when I tried it prepare for the web was to export the InD file in a JPEG file, open it in PS and save it as a .psd file before making any changes. After you convert the color in RGB, I resize to 3 "x 3" at 72 dpi, then saved as a JPEG file with a new name. "  I think that the resizing and resolutoion is where I was wrong. But I am at a loss for the right way forward and what parameters to use for the image size and resolution.

  What is the procedure I should I have followed to prepare the cover over a picture for the web? Here is the image exported in JPEG format at 150 dpi.

  Thanks in advance.

  Toni

  

  Toni...

  I'm doing print and web and often take a page ID to an image.

  What I do...

  1. Export Indesign to PDF. (Use any standard PDF job option you have, same PDFX1a)
  2. Drag the PDF Photoshop > open 300 PPI and no matter what the dimensions are already present.
  3. If necessary, crop and flatten the image in Photoshop. (PDFx1a will be cropped and flattening will offset any transparency in the PDF file.)
  4. In Photoshop > file > save for Web > dimensions of the input image I need in the box dialog SFW
  5. Click Save.

  What's been sent by others is correct. There is no PPP/DPI for the web. The only thing that matters is the width and height. If you want you can test to show you. Create 2 images - one to 100 x 100 pixels and 300ppi and the other to 100 x 100 pixels and 72 dpi. Save the two images for the web, and then open the pictures stored in a browser... they are the same size and look identical.

  Export to PDF from ID, you get a crisp, clean the PDF.

  By dragging the PDF to PS, you get a purified PS image. If you export a jpg of ID and then save a jpg of PS that you create artifacts due to the re-registration of a compressed format (jpg).

  Using save for Web to create the final image all the superfluous image data are robbed and you get a basic, clean and crisp image to the size entry in the SFW.

  There are other roads, you can take, but for me this five-step process gives the best results in all cases.

• What is the disadvantage of savings WITHOUT color profile for the web?

  I have discussed this issue in another thread and a clear argument against saving jpg files * without * a color profile must be performed.

  I'm very annoyed with how much more red and saturated, all my jpg files appear in IE (which does not read the sRGB embedded profile) compared to FF (which is the case).

  I tried to save the image even with the inclusion of unchecked color profile, and of course, IE and FF are showing the same image.

  It seems to me that including color profiles with jpg are just an invitation for different browsers interpret the image differently.

  Why not just save them all, WITHOUT color profiles?

  The downside to this, what exactly?

  mjyeager wrote:

  Emil, please do not confuse what follows for stubbornness...

  No worries, I never had such thoughts

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... IE does not read color profiles. The fact of FF. ERGO, in situations where a color profile is involved, the JPG will be different in each browser.

  True, without color managed programs and management the colors may not display an image in the same way. Except in the situation where the color profile describing the color of the image or the color values of an image without a color profile, by an extraordinary chance match the display capabilities of color of the device used by the program managed without colors.

  One of the problems that the addresses of color management is that all monitors will display the same color differently. Color management will make colors appear the same or as close as possible.

  A color managed program will send the RGB values of the color of the video card corrected to compensate for the differences between how your monitor displays color values and how they are perceived.

  For example, to help my Monitor wide gamut, when I create an image in Photoshop, with a red color pure R = 255, G = 0 and B = 0 and then do a screen capture, I can check how Photoshop sends these values to the video card. The result is R = 222, G = 65, B = 0 when I'm simulating an ideal sRGB display. So I can see how my colors appear on the screens of ideal sRGB. However, in reality, it is very likely to have a monitor displaying space sRGB color ideal without a color management, so to complete the color management chain, the other monitors that display my image must also have the appropriate color management to compensate for the differences in screen and display correctly RGB numbers representing the color that I see on my screen.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... However, if the JPG has no color profile, image shows exactly the same way in both browsers...

  Who will most likely be a bad smell, which means not repoducing the expected color which is always the case with the browsers managed without colors.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... Now, let's say this image - which looks the same in both browsers - is too hot. I can load it in Photoshop, change its hue and re-save is more what I'm looking for. The resulting image will then out - in the two browsers identically - the way I want to...

  Yes, the image will be the same in both browsers on your and any other monitor but the colors that you create (edit) will examine the way which only see you them on your monitor.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... Now, what I think you are trying to do, is that I have no control on what are the conditions of viewing on the OTHER end (i.e., visitors to the site). They could range wide monitors, cheaper monitors, running MAC or PC, etc...

  I don't remember talking about this earlier, but yes, it's true.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... It's true. I have no control over that. However, how including the color profile sRGB with the JPG would give me more control over these things I would not include? Unless you had to tell me that browsers arbitrarily apply a random color profile when in the absence of one, I am simply not understand how including the color with the JPG profile performs one another act that ensure that the picture is completely different in FF it does in Internet Explorer.

  You who are absolutely wrong. Color management is not to have any control over how other devices are setup, calibrated, etc.. As I said earlier make sure you communicate the colors scheduled correctly or as close as possible, as long as you and the destination use the proper color management. This means that the embedded profile FF will display correctly the planned colors while IE will not. If you do not include a color profile with your image both FF and IE will not display correctly the planned colors but they will be equal in that.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... I understand the need for color profiles to print. In fact, my printer insists on the details when it comes to color profiles.

  But for the web? I'm still not understand where the downside is to omit the color profile. It's not like the browsers get CONFUSED when it is not included. Or that the colors will start randomly from refreshing one page to another.

  I am really trying to understand what you are saying here, but still haven't.

  In addition to what Marian said:

  If you create the colors using an sRGB display ideal (given the color management on your system works properly, it can be simulated by color of Photoshop on your range management widescreen when you assign the profile sRGB color to the image) and then on any ideal sRGB display, it will look the same you see on your screen regardless if it's with or without embedded sRGB color profile. However, in reality, it is unlikely to have a monitor, sRGB, display of the ideal space of sRGB color without color management. Now what does this mean in practice? Assume that users interested in, using the IE managed without colors on a PC with the Windows default color management. In other words, color management programs are told by the system monitor displays the ideal sRGB space, which is very likely to be the truth. Then users with this configuration with sRGB monitors will not see a difference between IE and FF when viewing your image with or without sRGB profile, the colors are not very likely to be the same that you see on the screen, but with the difference that is more likely to be accepted depending on how close to the ideal color space sRGB these monitors are. If some of these users with this configuration have wide range monitors, then the image will always be the same with or without sRGB profile, but with a very unacceptable difference of how you see it on your space to sRGB sumulated - strongly supersaturated.

  For users that have the color correctly managed systems, when the image is saved with a sRGB profile, it appears color managed programs such as FF the same or as close as possible to the way in which you can see on your monitor. Programs run without colors the case remains the same as that described above.

  A little history on how standard sRGB was created. It is a standard, including more things, but above all defining an abstract color space. It was created sometime after that the market was already flooded with computer monitors, and the creation of ideal sRGB color space was based on an average PC monitor display capabilities over time. After that the manufacturers used this standard sRGB as a target to create monitors.

  UN-color of programs run on PC have been created and tested using sRGB monitors so that they can't be considered reliable for showing intended to display colors if the images they use have been created using an sRGB they will be in the stadium of this range of sRGB.

• What is the best export for the web?

  What is considered the best export from Adobe Illustrator CC 2015 for the web these days? I know that PNG has the color a bit better than JPEG files. How about SVG?

  What is your recommendation?

  Thank you

  For modern websites of today, vectors are now better saved in SVG. As long as you use the last CC 2015, use file > export to create the SVG (which is newer than the file > save under). It will yield a smaller SVG files.

  Better, photos are saved in JPEG format.

  PNG are not "keep color" better. The JPEG and PNG24 support millions of colors, but a JPEG will be able to compress photographic details better, if you end up with a file of faster loading.

  For HTML Email SVG is not appropriate, so I use PNG or GIF instead (whichever is smaller) to the line drawings in general I want to save it as SVG.

• I need to create combinations of text and images for the web. How to do this in elements or do I need Photoshop for this feature?

  I need to create combinations of text and images for the web. How to do this in elements or do I need Photoshop for this feature?  Please advise!

  slynn5236 wrote:

  I need to create combinations of text and images for the web. How to do this in elements or do I need Photoshop for this feature?  Please advise!

  You can do in PSE.

  1. Do the math to see how much space you'll need on your canvas to the image and text.
  2. Navigate to the file queue > new.blank. Enter the width & height, background color, resolution 72 px / in. It is your canvas, and in the layers palette will be the background layer.
  3. Copy and paste the image. It turns on a separate layer
  4. Activate the tool move, position the image and resize if necessary
  5. Activate the text tool, and then type your text. It will be on a separate so layer
  6. Position the text.
  7. Flatten layers and go to file > save for web. I'm usually on the long side about 800 px. Don't forget to check "constrain proportions". Adjust the quality slider to suit. You will probably want the type of JPEG file for web work.

• What happened to the image field when you create a field of type of image for the Web application?

  What happened to the image field when you create a field of type of image for the Web application?

  The answer is that the point of the IMAGE has been changed to the MEDIA.

  Sorry, Ian, what research for this discussion, I got no results. All good and thanks for the carillon. Hope everything goes well.

  Mouma

• Best way to prepare images ProPhoto RGB for the Web?

  My working to Edit my RAW files color space is ProPhoto RGB. My master files are saved as ProPhoto RGB 16 bit layered PSD files. I am aware of the many ways to prepare my images for the Web, but it is better to properly view my work on a web site?

  
  

  «Save for Web...» "of Photoshop is easy, but it's also good work like resize manually,"Convert to Profile"(sRGB), then" save under... ". "an 8-bit JPEG? I noticed "Save for Web...» "its color space designated as"Untagged RGB", while the manual method is"sRGB"will create a file w. Any difference? Thank you.
  

  Were you not satisfied by the answers you got this question on Luminous Landscape forum? I will repost mine here:

  ---

  You should always incorporate the profile. With the notable exception of Internet Explorer (which seems to be a lost cause), most browsers now manage well of color management. At least Safari and Firefox both do.

  Save for Web in Photoshop always band profile with default settings, you will need to check the "embed color profile". This setting sticks. Personally, I think it's well past time to change this default, but that's it.

  While you're there, check "Convert to sRGB" and set to "use the embedded profile. This shows you the image with full color management (using the monitor profile to display). Here still SFW uses an obsolete default from the old days, when browsers were not color management.

  If you use a range wide screen a few special considerations come in and in Firefox, a manual adjustment has be activated (color management mode 1) *.

  Regarding resizing, I have no particular opinion. SFW seems to do well. But you should do a final sharpening after resizing, that needs to be done in Photoshop anyway, so he can probably handle resizing too. Construction while some actions and you are ready.

  Firefox users should enable this setting in all cases, regardless of monitor they use. What it does is assign sRGB to any untagged material. This allows full color management chain, instead of just go directly to the screen unmanaged. IOW, even color management on hardware untagged, so long as it is created in sRGB with sRGB numbers.

• PE 9 - no possible preset saving for the web...

  Hello

  Is it really true that there is no possibility to preset the form used to save images for the web?

  I went from 7 PE PE 9 some time ago, but I'm pretty sure that it was no problem with PE7. This version of the EP recalled automatically or there was a way of presetting of the file format. I never use anything. JPG, so it's rather annoying that. GIF reappears each time.

  Best thanks in advance for your answer!

  Hi margaret

  When you launch the editor right click the icon and choose Run as administrator.

  Open an image and save as jpeg using save for web. Then close the elements.

  You can always choose "Run As Administrator" whenever you start the program, but to remember the jpeg setting.

• How can I change my mood Message in Skype for the Web?

  How can I change my mood message in Skype for the Web?

  People of good news: you can now change your mood message in Skype for the Web

  Just click on the picture at the top left of your profile, and then click the small icon of pencil next to the message of change in activity.

• Possible security for the Web-based Configuration

  My colleagues and I found something very interesting today... Despite having configured the FTP security settings (which have been confirmed to set up and in funcitoning. I can't open an FTP session to our remote target without specifying a username admin and the password) If you open the configuration tool based OR web in a browser, you can send via FTP to and from the target using the file remote browser without being connected to all! Everyone knows this?

  Apparently, these permissions are separate from FTP, but you can define these special permissions on the page of the security configuration for the web-based configuration utility.

• Does anyone know what are the causes for the (!) symbol in red in all my icons of file work?

  Does anyone know what are the causes for the (!) symbol in red in all my icons of file work?

  Most likely your sauvegardΘ (backup status indicator) program, maybe Norton, McAfee or Mozy, indicating the file not saved yet.