ORA-000060: Deadlock detected. More info in file filename.trc

Similar Questions

• ORA-00060: Deadlock detected while you wait the cursor CLOSE resource

  Hello
  
  I am a new Member of this forum. I work with a problem that we have obtained a few weeks ago. It runs in the lot C Pro executable on 10 threads dealing with > 800 data accessed from more than one table. The error, such as reported was a package.function call.
  
  This is the error I encountered:
  process_item ~ G *, D * ~-60 ~ ORA-00060: Deadlock detected while you wait resources ~ PACKAGE ERROR = cursor CLOSE C_ * in the R package *. I * 7641
  
  The slider is a simple SELECT without Table or record locking.
  
  My questions are:
  * During the occurrence of this error, execution is already in the line of the CLOSE cursor or did the error has occurred between the OPEN and the CLOSE slider? There are several lines of code between the OPENING and CLOSING:
  -one who calls to a package.function that simply stores the values of parameter to a variable
  -another one that retrieves the cursor. The group that contains the values of the cursor is used only by a single function in the package
  
  * Is it possible for this CLOSE cursor cause a deadlock? What could have caused this?
  
  * From what I know, Oracle treats blocks by abandoning the blocking process, while others continue, but this impasse caused our program to hang. How is that possible? The origin of the impasse might be our Threading program? This is a rare event and has past that twice this year.
  
  Thank you
  RAF

  RAF Serrano wrote:
  I see, so it be that blocking has occurred before the CLOSE cursor or it occurred during CLOSING? The cause could be executable ProC

  first cause is NOT ProC

  or is it really an error in PL/SQL

  first cause is NOT PL/SQL.

  cause of ORA-00060 is DML (INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE)

• ORA-00060: Deadlock detected while you wait resource

  Hello
  
  I have a trigger to an underlying table. It fires after that insertion of the events in the underlying table. When I try to update some columns in a table underlying even within the trigger, I get the error below.
  
  ORA-00060: Deadlock detected while you wait resource
  
  Can anyone clear or correct me.
  
  Thank you

  Ignore the Aurélie. It is just a spammer who is trying to promote some criminal website.

  A deadlock occurred if two different sessions lock resources. Each session can wait the other session ends.

  I suppose that you set up a trigger and use the 'autonomous transaction' wrongly to a commit. This function creates a new session. Now you have two (or more) session that could create deadlock. Committing inside a trigger from the table is ALWAYS bad (with some exceptions).

  Solution: remove the pragma of your relaxation. Then the other problems you get with it.

• ORA - 04020:deadlock detected while trying to lock object when running catqm

  I am a newbie. Help, please.
  I improved my db from 10g to 11g using dbua and found that xmldb didn't settle. so, I install the catqm script xmldbthrough and he finds himself in a bind. My alert log complained abput the impasse. How can I stop the script now?

  As far as I KNOW, the process level to level only those components that are installed. It adds no new components. :-)

  HTH
  Srini

• Deadlock detected

  Hello
  
  all applying patch workers got faile dand I checked the logs and newspaper said dected deadlock.
  So I checked the newspaper alert... and alert a mistake to show who headed one of the trace files...
  and I got the following info from the trace file
  
  
  Release 9.2.0.8.0 - Production jserver
  ORACLE_HOME = /bustools/oracle/v01/product/9.2.0.8
  Name of the system: AIX
  Name of the node: AIXAPP01
  Press release: 3
  Version: 5
  Machine: 00SBFC005A01
  Instance name: DPAPPL01
  Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
  Oracle process number: 44
  The Unix process PID: 1269774, image: oracle@aixapp01 (TNS V1 - V3)
  
  SESSION ID: (103.4753) 2009-06-27 08:15:37.952
  DEADLOCK DETECTED (ORA-00060)
  The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It's a
  deadlock due to the error of the user in the design of an application
  or deliver incorrect SQL ad hoc. What follows
  information can help determine the impasse:
  Deadlock graph event:
  -Blockers - Waiter (s).
  Resource name process session held process session expected holds expected
  TX-00020015-00017e5b 44 50 103 X 42 X
  TX-00060013-000274aa 42 50 X 44 103 X
  session 103: IS 0001-002C-00002EFE session 50: 0001-002 a-00002E67
  session 50: FACT a 0001-002 - 00002E67 session 103: have you 0001-002C-00002EFE
  Expected number of lines:
  Session 50: obj - rowid = 000A2C20 - AACiwgAFbAAAI5zAAZ
  (dictionary objn - 666656, file - 347, block - 36467, sub - 25 machine)
  Session 103: obj - rowid = 000A2C20 - AACiwgAFbAAAI5yACK
  (dictionary objn - 666656, file - 347, block - 36466, machine slot - 138)
  Information about OTHER sessions of waiting:
  Session 50:
  PID = 42 series = 18272 audsid = user 1382965: 69/APPS
  Info of the o/s: user: dpaappl01, term: pts/1, ospid: 1478862, machine: aixapp01
  program:
  Customer Info: 055 AY385 N
  Current SQL statement:
  
  
  so now, how to get the SID and SPID and serail #.
  
  and in the light of the foregoing, I see unix process pid 1269774 and ospid = 1478862...
  I'm not clear on this topic so plese I want what sid pid spid and and ospid...
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  You can refer to the following ML doc to get a complete idea about the issue.

  [ORA-60 / locks the more frequent Causes | https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=164661.1]

  [What to do with ORA-60 deadlock errors | https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=62365.1]

  Thank you
  Anchorage :)

• ORA-000060 (dead end) while inserting

  Dear all,
  
  I am currently faced with a problem:
  
  -We get ORA-000060
  -the trace file generated by the error, shows an INSERT operation as the current operation
  -The table on the INSERT operation above was below the properties:
  -NO BITMAP INDEXES
  -The table is PARTITIONNEE of RANGE
  -A UNIQUE PARTITIONED LOCAL INDEX
  -DB version is Oracle 9.2.0.6 on HP - UX
  
  My question is why an insert operation will lead to blocking (bitmap index)?
  Or it occurred to other operations, if that's the case, then why the trace file shows the operation of insertion as the current operation?
  Help, please.
  
  BR
  Obaid

  OK, according to the deadlock graph event, what are the TX enqueues, as well, it is certainly NOT a nonindexed foreign key problem. Locking not indexed because FKs cause TM enqueue waits, not TX enqueue.

  Since this is a S mode waiting on TX and the statement in question is an insert, the most likely cause is superimposed on the index of the unique values.

  Assume that you have:
  create table testit (a number);
  create an index only uniq_ind on testit (a);

  Now, if you have two sessions inserting testit:

  session 1:
  insert into testit values (1);

  session 2:
  insert into testit values (2);

  session 1:
  -the following insert statement will start to hang, waiting for session 2 to commit or rollback
  insert into testit values (2);

  session 2:
  -the next session hangs for three seconds, then Oracle can detect a blocking and session 1 will get an ORA-00060.
  insert into testit values (1);

  Then, if you have two concurrent sessions that overlap on the values of the non-validated unique values, you will see S mode TX enqueue waits.

  Hope that helps,

  -Mark

• DEADLOCK DETECTED - DELETE statement - how/why he expects in SHARING mode?

  Hello
  
  I wonder if anyone can advise here. The environment is:
  
  Microsoft Windows 2003 Server
  Standard Oracle 10.2.0.4 Edition
  
  We had a deadlock detected in our application on a customer site - I enclose the corresponding part of the trace file below. While we think we have found the reason for the deadlock (looks like it is due to a foreign key in cascade), I'm confused as the lock mode that is requested.
  
  Here is the track information:
  

  Deadlock graph:
                         ---------Blocker(s)--------  ---------Waiter(s)---------
  Resource Name          process session holds waits  process session holds waits
  TX-00120012-00003b59        28     475     X             29     481           S
  TX-000a0029-0003508b        29     481     X             28     475           X
  session 475: DID 0001-001C-000F96B0     session 481: DID 0001-001D-00000079
  session 481: DID 0001-001D-00000079     session 475: DID 0001-001C-000F96B0
  Rows waited on:
  Session 481: no row
  Session 475: obj - rowid = 00014625 - AAAUYlAAIAAAAawAAo
    (dictionary objn - 83493, file - 8, block - 1712, slot - 40)
  Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:
  Session 481:
    pid=29 serial=18261 audsid=202192707 user: 51/info
    O/S info: user: SYSTEM, term: our_term, ospid: 5244:940, machine: our_machine
              program: our_exe.exe
    client info: GUI
    application name: app, hash value=3864155245
    action name: our_action, hash value=3631189430
    Current SQL Statement:
    DELETE FROM TABLE_1 T WHERE T.T_ID = :B1
  End of information on OTHER waiting sessions.
  Current SQL statement for this session:
  UPDATE TABLE_1 T SET T.STATUS_ID = :B2 WHERE T.T_ID = :B1 

  It seems to me like session * 481 * trying to do a deletion when the block is raised:
  

   DELETE FROM TABLE_1 T WHERE T.T_ID = :B1

  and ask which mode (dynamique31) S .

                                     ---------Blocker(s)--------  ---------Waiter(s)---------
  Resource Name          process session holds waits  process session holds waits
  TX-00120012-00003b59        28     475     X             29     481           S

  (also the 'no line' for lines didn't wait)
  

  Session 481: no row

  I thought it would be in mode (e) X (clusive) (for the line being deleted). Actually Yes, I set up a test of fast and simple locking and mode (e) X (is) expected the final delete .
  
  So, am I misinterpreted the tracing information, or is the DELETE statement requesting the lock in mode S (Hare)? If this is the case, I'd appreciate a quick explanation of how/why it's...
  
  
  
  Kind regards
  
  ADOS

  I think we have almost the same reason to wait in S mode as in [single key application | http://books.google.pl/books?id=14OmJzfCfXMC&dq=oracle+wait+interface+practical+guide&q=unique+key+enforcement].
  If two sessions want to insert the same key value, the other must wait, because the outcome depends on a commit / rollback of the first session. In the case of validation, session 2 must generate an error in case of cancellation, it must insert his record.

  In the test provided by ADOS, at session 1 there is an insert in session 2 - delete. The result of the delete operation depends, once again, commit or rollback in the first session. In the case of validation, it must remove, and cancellations, there is nothing to remove.

  If the insert in session 1 has been replaced by the Update, there is no S lock but 'normal' eXclusive

  Bartek

• Sizes of Splash screen and names for the iPhone 6 and 6 more in the file descriptor xml files

  Is anyone know the sizes of screen and the file names for the iPhone 6 and 6 more (for the descriptor xml file)? Or current splash screens works on both devices?

  i.e. Default-Portrait.png *-768w x 1024 h

  Hello

  Here is the specification.

  iPhone 6	Start screen	750 x 1334	72	[email protected]	Resources or resources/iphone
  iPhone 6 more landscape	Start screen	2208 x 1242	72	[email protected]	Resources or resources/iphone
  iPhone 6 Plus portrait	Start screen	1242 x 2208	72	[email protected]	Resources or resources/iphone

  You can find more info here - http://docs.appcelerator.com/titanium/3.0/#! / guide/Icons_and_Splash_Screens-section-290048 97_IconsandSplashScreens-Splashscreens

• Corrupt block is detected in the control file

  Hi all
  
  I have a scenario where I have set up regional advisory councils active / standby and I managed archive redo logs applied to sleep - everything was ok
  
  Versions - Oracle 11g R2, RHEL 5
  
  Scenario 1:
  Perfectly redo application log on the work of sleep when I don't create our software application tables using sql on the primary scripts until AFTER the stages of CAR/Dataguard completed successfully.
  
  
  
  Scenario 2:
  Redo log application does not work when I'm not running our sql scripts until I take a RMAN backup of the primary to be duplicated in the Standby
  
  Everything comes in the day before after the rman duplicate, archive logs is transferred, but now they are not applied.
  
  I see the ORA-00227: Corrupt block is detected in the control file: (block 1, block # 1) in the journal alerts when I put on standby in Recovery Mode
  
  My theory is that somehow our sql scripts are breaking my rman backups when I run them before creating a primary RMAN backup to load on Standby - I just need someone to indicate whether there is a possibility of their experience, if so I will contact the support of Oracle to continue the investigation. It's my first time working on CARS DG etc.
  
  Thank you

  Hello
  If not solved with 11.2.0.2 I opened a SR.
  I don't think that this should be the case...
  Sebastian

• Cannot start db > ORA-09925: cannot create the audit trail file

  version 10.1.0.5.0
  AIX 3 5 00C9CEA04C00 dcxnim01
  
  When I'm trying to start db, getting this message any idea?
  
  SQL > connect virtue sysdba;
  ERROR:
  ORA-09925: cannot create the audit trail file
  IBM AIX RISC System/6000 error: 89: invalid file system control data detected
  Additional information: 9925
  ORA-09925: cannot create the audit trail file
  IBM AIX RISC System/6000 error: 89: invalid file system control data detected
  Additional information: 9925
  
  
  Here's the tail of the log of alerts
  
  3 Private_strands to the log command
  Thread 1 Advanced for you connect to sequence 3923
  Currently journal # 1, seq # 3923 mem # 0: /db01/oradata/ldapdcx1/ldapdcx1/redo01.log
  Fri 6 Aug 16:48:34 2010
  Errors in the /oracle/admin/ldapdcx1/bdump/ldapdcx1_j001_991348.trc file:
  [ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [] [] [] [] []]
  Fri 6 Aug 16:48:35 2010
  Errors in the /oracle/admin/ldapdcx1/bdump/ldapdcx1_mmnl_508106.trc file:
  [ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [] [] [] [] []]
  Fri 6 Aug 16:48:38 2010
  Errors in the /oracle/admin/ldapdcx1/bdump/ldapdcx1_ckpt_839714.trc file:
  [ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [] [] [] [] []]
  ORA-27072: IO file error
  IBM AIX RISC System/6000 error: 5: i/o error
  Additional information: 9
  Additional information: 3
  Fri 6 Aug 16:48:38 2010
  Errors in the /oracle/admin/ldapdcx1/bdump/ldapdcx1_lgwr_905470.trc file:
  [ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [] [] [] [] []]
  ORA-27063: number of bytes read or written is incorrect
  IBM AIX RISC System/6000 error: 5: i/o error
  Additional information:-1
  Additional information: 1024
  Fri 6 Aug 16:49:07 2010
  Errors in the /oracle/admin/ldapdcx1/bdump/ldapdcx1_pmon_848078.trc file:
  ORA-00470: LGWR process ended with the error

  IBM AIX RISC System/6000 error: 5: i/o error
  Additional information:-1

  Problem of the OS.
  What is the problem at the level of the BONE with the disc?

  unpacking of tail - 100

• Get read and write access to the info.plist file

  Hello, I tried to get the permission of R/W to info.plist but some how I could not make it through. I know that many of you already have this problem, I'm looking everywhere, but he do not workout for me, here's the screenshots as well. Can someone please share the solution. Thank you

  

  You must disable SIP starting in local catering and disable execution of csrutil. What year/model is your Mac, which requires Bootcamp Info.plist file changes?

• I need more info on the Windows XP Professional x 64 edition

  I have two copies of a Windows XP Professional x 64 Edition operating system and would like more info on this OS, which it is intended, who can use it and under what conditions are required for usage.  each disc has the following information about it:

  English
  Microsoft Windows XP Professional
  x 64 edition
  (Required product key)

  June 2006

  Systems

  Media/student work
  The Home Media

  All use subject to volume
  license agreement.  Do
  not make illegal copies
  This disc.  No detail
  or OEM Distribution.  Not
  for resale.

  Microsoft licenses

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-XP/help/setup/Windows-XP-Professional-x64-Edition-FAQ

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-XP/Setup/Windows-XP-Professional-x64-Edition-Overview

  These articles should help you understand XP Pro - x 64

• New 4 GB Clip + empty shows 8 GB card when the internal memory has more than 10 files

  If I have more than 10 files on the internal memory, external 8 GB card will appear empty. If I format the internal memory and does not add any files, I see everything on the external card. MSC is set and PC, I see all of each drive.

  Any advice? I had rather not return this if I can make it work.

  Thank you.

  Initially, this was resolved by a reupload 1.02.15A firmware. But the problem comes back.

  I went to the RockBox firmware, and it works as expected. I'll check the next official FW and see if it has not changed.

  For now, I'm happy with RockBox.

• Pop - up saying that I am low on memory and close the files. How to check my memory or more or delete files that take memory?

  Original title: HOW TO CHECK FOR an INSUFFICIENT MEMORY

  I have a Toshiba laptop (110 GB Vista, Windows 7), but I don't know how to check the memory and get a pop up saying that I am low on memory and close the files... How to check my memory or more or delete files that take memory? Thank you

  Hello

  ·         You will remember to do recent changes on the computer before this problem?

  ·         Fact the occurs when you only access Internet Explorer?

  ·         You have dual boot on the computer operating system? If yes the issue is limited to Windows vista?

  Low memory message may appear if the system hard drive is full, or running out of memory. I suggest you follow the steps in the link and check if the problem persists:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/preventing-low-memory-problems

  You can also optimize Windows vista for better performance. Follow the steps in the link:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/optimize-Windows-Vista-for-better-performance

• Which, if any, in C:\Windows\winsxs files can be deleted? More than 7000 files and 4 gig C: drive.

  In Windows 7 or any other Microsoft operating system which, if all the records in C:\Windows\winsxs can be deleted? More than 7000 files and 4 GB of space disk C:.

  If you have SP1, and then install this update KB2852386, then go to the Disk Cleanup Wizard, and you will have a new option to remove the old windows updates, which will clean the winsxs folder.