ORA-01436: CONNECT loop in the user data

Similar Questions

• ORA-01436: CONNECT loop in the user data when the delimited string splitting by the

  I'm trying to split a string into records. The values are three characters more '-' with a limit of 12 values. The values themselves are a combination of two data, the first being two characters, a.

  The following example translates: ORA-01436: CONNECT BY a loop in the user data

  WITH
      Data(Code, Datum)
  AS
      (
       SELECT 'VGCU3VM', '00V-YYG-BVC-PIU-DV3-EVV-TVM-' FROM Dual UNION ALL
       SELECT 'VGAU3VM', '00V-YYG-BVA-PIU-DV3-EVV-TVM-' FROM Dual UNION ALL
       SELECT 'VGLN3CM', '00V-YYG-BVL-PIN-DV3-EVC-TVM-' FROM Dual UNION ALL
       SELECT 'VGLT3PM', '00V-YYG-BVL-PIT-DV3-EVP-TVM-' FROM Dual UNION ALL
       SELECT 'VGAT3RA', '00V-YYG-BVA-PIT-DV3-EVR-TVA-' FROM Dual
      )
  SELECT
      Datum,
      LEVEL,
      SUBSTR(Datum, ((LEVEL - 1) * 4) + 1, 2),
      SUBSTR(Datum, ((LEVEL - 1) * 4) + 3, 1)
  FROM
      Data
  CONNECT BY
      Code    = PRIOR Code
      AND    LEVEL    <= LENGTH(Datum) / 4;
  
  

  Remove the 'Code = Code PREREQUISITE"clause, to avoid the error, but too many records are returned, because nothing is to limit the records in their own groups.

  The following works:

  WITH
      Data(Code, Datum)
  AS
      (
       SELECT 'VGCU3VM', '00V-YYG-BVC-PIU-DV3-EVV-TVM-' FROM Dual UNION ALL
       SELECT 'VGAU3VM', '00V-YYG-BVA-PIU-DV3-EVV-TVM-' FROM Dual UNION ALL
       SELECT 'VGLN3CM', '00V-YYG-BVL-PIN-DV3-EVC-TVM-' FROM Dual UNION ALL
       SELECT 'VGLT3PM', '00V-YYG-BVL-PIT-DV3-EVP-TVM-' FROM Dual UNION ALL
       SELECT 'VGAT3RA', '00V-YYG-BVA-PIT-DV3-EVR-TVA-' FROM Dual
      )
  SELECT
      Datum,
      SUBSTR(Datum, ((Some.Num - 1) * 4) + 1, 2) A,
      SUBSTR(Datum, ((Some.Num - 1) * 4) + 3, 1) B
  FROM
      Data,
      (SELECT LEVEL Num FROM Dual CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 12) Some
  WHERE
      SUBSTR(Datum, ((Some.Num - 1) * 4) + 1, 2) IS NOT NULL;
  
  

  What causes ORA-01436?

  Hello

  Depending on your version, you can add another condition to your CONNECT BY clause.

  It works in Oracle 11.2.0.3.0:

  SELECT

  Point of reference,

  LEVEL,

  SUBSTR (Datum, ((LEVEL-1) * 4) + 1, 2),

  SUBSTR (Datum, ((LEVEL-1) * 4) + 3, 1)

  Of

  Data

  CONNECT

  Code = Code PRIOR

  AND LEVEL<= length(datum)="">

  AND PRIOR SYS_GUID () IS NOT NULL-* ADDED *.

  ;

  Thanks for the display of the data of the sample; This is really useful!

  In addition, relational databases are designed to have 1 piece of information in each column of each row, not a list delimited by up to 12 points.  It is so basic to the design of database he called the first normal form.  You're going to solve a lot of problems even before they occur if you paste to first normal form and change the table structure to resemble the result set of this query.  (Maybe that's exactly why you're doing this query.)

• ORA-01436: CONNECT loop in the user data, but CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE is equal to ZERO all the

  Hello
  
  When I run query below, it always throws the below error:

  SELECT connect_by_root code AS code_root,
      CODE,
      CODE_DESC,
      UP_CODE 
    FROM DI_CODE_LEVEL
    WHERE TYPE_CODE='SP'
      CONNECT BY PRIOR CODE=UP_CODE;
  
  ORA-01436: CONNECT BY loop in user data
  01436. 00000 -  "CONNECT BY loop in user data"

  But when I use NOCLYCLE and CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE to see which line is in question.
  It shows nothing, which means CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE = ZERO for all rows.

  select * from (
      SELECT connect_by_root code AS code_root,
          CODE,
          CODE_DESC,
          UP_CODE ,
          CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE AS ISCYCLE
        FROM DI_CODE_LEVEL
        WHERE TYPE_CODE='SP'
          CONNECT BY NOCYCLE PRIOR CODE=UP_CODE
      ) 
  where ISCYCLE>0;

  Is there another reason that sql would lift ORA-01436?
  If there is a loop, then will the combination of NOCYCLE, CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE will show?
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  Apparently, one or more of the "SP" lines are at the origin of the problem.
  The WHERE clause is applied after the CONNECT BY is finished, saying:

  select * from (
      SELECT connect_by_root code AS code_root,
          CODE,
          CODE_DESC,
          UP_CODE ,
          CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE AS ISCYCLE
        FROM DI_CODE_LEVEL
        WHERE TYPE_CODE='SP'
          CONNECT BY NOCYCLE PRIOR CODE=UP_CODE
      )
  where ISCYCLE>0;
  

  is equivalent to

  select * from (
      SELECT connect_by_root code AS code_root,
          CODE,
          CODE_DESC,
          UP_CODE ,
          CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE AS ISCYCLE
        FROM DI_CODE_LEVEL
          CONNECT BY NOCYCLE PRIOR CODE=UP_CODE
      )
  WHERE    TYPE_CODE = 'SP'
  AND     ISCYCLE   > 0;
  

  To see where the loop occurs, you must include the lines where type_code = "SP".

  When you debug "ORA-01436: CONNECT IN a loop in the user data ', view SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (uk,...), where the United Kingdom is a unique key. That will tell you much more than just the root information. You might want this:

  SELECT  connect_by_root code                AS code_root,
          CODE,
          CODE_DESC,
          UP_CODE
  ,     SYS_CONNECCT_BY_PATH (code, '/')     AS path          -- For debugging
  ,       CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE                AS ISCYCLE     -- For debugging
  FROM      DI_CODE_LEVEL
  -- WHERE TYPE_CODE = 'SP'     -- Commented out for debugging
  where      ISCYCLE > 0          -- For debugging
  CONNECT BY NOCYCLE      PRIOR CODE = UP_CODE
  

  I hope that answers your question.
  If not, post a small example data (CREATE TABLE and only relevant columns, INSERT statements), and the results you want from this data.
  Explain how you get these results from these data.
  Always tell what version of Oracle you are using.

• ORA-01436 - connect loop in the user data - only in the database 10G...

  Hello
  
  I'm having a problem with a query. First of all I have to say that I choose this query on the internet and has adapted to my worries... so I understand very well the "connection of level" clause... that's why I need help to find out what is happening here...
  
  The query is all ok in a 8i database, but if I took exactly the same query on a 10G database I got the error "ORA-01436 - connect with loop in user data.
  
  This query returns one row for each day between 2 dates passed as parameters. The query takes 4 parameters: a date 'from', date 'for' and 2 other parameters indicating if we want that Saturdays and Sundays (end of week) in the result set.
  
  This is the query:
  
  Select days_between.days
  de)
  SELECT & date_from + ROWNUM-1 days
  DE)
  SELECT 1 nothing
  OF THE DOUBLE
  CONNECTION OF LEVEL < = (nvl(&date_to,&date_from) - & date_from + 1)
  )
  where & date_from + ROWNUM-1 < = nvl (date_to, & date_from)
  ) days_between
  where (nvl (& exclude_saturdays, 'Y') = ' or replace (to_char (days_between.days, 'DAY'),' ') not in ('SATURDAY', 'SATURDAY'))
  and (nvl (& exclude_sundays, 'Y') = ' or replace (to_char (days_between.days, 'DAY'),' ') not in ('SUNDAY', 'SUNDAY'))
  
  For the parameter 'date_from' enter 'to_date('2009-01-01','yyyy-mm-dd')' as a break for the 'date_to' 'to_date('2009-01-07','yyyy-mm-dd')' as a value parameter value. For the other 2 parameters, use 'Y' to exclude this day or "N" to keep this day here in the result set.
  
  So I said earlier, this query runs very well on a 8i database but not on a 10G a where I got the error "ORA01436 - connect with loop in user data.
  
  I have search the Internet but I don't know why it runs on a 8i and not on a 10G... Can someone help me please?

  Hello

  SELECT  ROWNUM  AS n
  FROM    dual
  CONNECT BY  LEVEL <= x;
  

  is a quick and easy way to generate a table of meters containing all integers from 1 to x. You are the query, it has been changed, not for a list of consecutive integers, but a list of consecutive dates.

  This technique only works in Oracle 9 (and more). You did a mistake when you said it works in Oracle 8 but not in Oracle 10? It is the opposite, when I try.

  Here is another way to generate a table of counters:

  SELECT  ROWNUM  AS n
  FROM    all_objects
  WHERE   ROWNUM  <= x;
  

  This method works in any version of Oracle, but it is slower than the method CONNECT BY and does not work for the great values on x. (this is probably good for x<= 5000,="" depending="" on="" your="">

  If you can do this:

  select days_between.days
  from     (
       SELECT     &date_from + ROWNUM - 1          as days
       FROM     all_objects
       WHERE     ROWNUM     <= (1 + NVL (&date_to, &date_from)) - &date_from
       ) days_between
  where     (     nvl(&exclude_saturdays,'Y') = 'N'
       or     replace(to_char(days_between.days,'DAY'),' ') not in ('SAMEDI','SATURDAY')
       )
  and     (     nvl(&exclude_sundays,'Y') = 'N'
       or     replace(to_char(days_between.days,'DAY'),' ') not in ('DIMANCHE','SUNDAY')
       )
  ;
  

  in any version of Oracle.

• Error: CONNECTION loop in the user data

  CONNECT IN a loop in the user data:

  Table X (sample data were actually lines 35K)

  --------------

  CODE CASE OLD_ID New_id PERSON AUTH                                                           

  01 ab122 1234 0001 AU123 99393

  07 vv353 7872 0919 FV982 78282

  01 ab122 1982 9929 99393 AU123

  04 hjsss 8839 8302 JK920 32320

  01 ab122 0001 1982 AU123 99393

  05 cg899 6728 32322 IKL020 65252

  07 w353 0919 8282 FV982 78282

  now I need to order these data comparing the values of the line to old_id new_id for each combination of code, person, case

  need output like below

  Table X

  --------------

  CODE CASE OLD_ID New_id PERSON AUTH                                                           

  01 ab122 1234 0001 AU123 99393

  01 ab122 0001 1982 AU123 99393

  01 ab122 1982 9929 99393 AU123

  04 hjsss 8839 8302 JK920 32320

  05 cg899 6728 32322 IKL020 65252

  07 vv353 7872 0919 FV982 78282

  07 w353 0919 8282 FV982 78282

  to get to what I use:

  -Request-

  Select * from table_x

  Start by old_id not in)

  Select new_id

  from table_x

  )

  CONNECT BY old_id new_id PRIOR =

  AND code = code PRIOR

  AND case EARLIER case =

  PER person = person PREREQUISITE

  -Request-

  works very well with the sample data, but the problem is when executed with actual table that has 35K record...

  Cause: The condition specified in a CONNECT BY clause caused a loop in the application, where the next record to be selected is a descendant of itself. When this happens, it may be no end to the query.

  Action: Check the CONNECT BY clause and remove the circular reference.

  Thank you

  AK

  Hello

  CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE is a pseudo-column that you can use in a query of CONNECTION BY NOCYCLE.  It is separated from the CONNECT BY clause.

  Try this:

  Select code, "BREAKS", person

  , SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (old_id, "/") AS path

  from table_x

  where CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE = 1

  Start by old_id not in)

  Select new_id

  from table_x

  )

  CONNECT BY NOCYCLE Old_id = new_id PRIOR

  AND code = code PRIOR

  AND 'CASE' = 'BOX' PRIOR

  PER person = person PREREQUISITE

  ;

  I hope that answers your question.
  If not, post a small example data (CREATE TABLE and only relevant columns, INSERT statements) and also publish outcomes from these data.
  Explain, using specific examples, how you get these results from these data.
  Always say what version of Oracle you are using (for example, 11.2.0.2.0).

  See the FAQ forum: https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362002#9362002

• Oracle: Connect loop in the user data

  I understand when a loop can occur in Oracle. In principle that it is said if a recording is both parent to another node and at the same time he was a child to him, then it may go into a loop.

  But I can't get why my this particular query is running in a loop.

  SELECT Empno, Ename, Job FROM Emp START WITH Empno = 7839 CONNECT BY PRIOR Job='PRESIDENT'

  Can someone please explain to me how these data can result in a loop. I did a CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE check and found that the closure of the case is KING (Chairman). But I still don't understand how can be possible, that the KING is the President and I do not see anything in which it becomes child and parent to any record in the table.

  Please explain to me, why is it a mistake and where is the loop?

  Thanks in advance.

  Maybe if I pull on the hierarchy of your query, you will see what he is doing...

  PRESIDENT OF KING 7839<-- start="">

  PRESIDENT OF KING 7839<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  PRESIDENT OF KING 7839<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  .. etc.

  .. etc.

  ANALYST SCOTT 7788<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7902 FORD ANALYST<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7369 SMITH CLERK<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7934 MILLER CLERK<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7900 JAMES CLERK<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  CLERK OF 7876 ADAMS<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7566 JONES MANAGER<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  MANAGER CLARK 7782<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  BLAKE MANAGER 7698<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7499 ALLEN SALESMAN<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7521 WARD SALESMAN<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7654 MARTIN SALESMAN<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7844 TURNER SELLER<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  ANALYST SCOTT 7788<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7902 FORD ANALYST<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7369 SMITH CLERK<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7934 MILLER CLERK<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7900 JAMES CLERK<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  CLERK OF 7876 ADAMS<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7566 JONES MANAGER<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  MANAGER CLARK 7782<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  BLAKE MANAGER 7698<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7499 ALLEN SALESMAN<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7521 WARD SALESMAN<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7654 MARTIN SALESMAN<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  7844 TURNER SELLER<-- prior="" job='PRESIDENT'>

  Thus, in the first level of the hierarchy is your record START you WITH.

  When all folders are examined, the test of the PREREQUISITE WORK examines the top level folder, determines that he was the PRESIDENT and therefore each record matches this condition.

  Then, each of these folders are evaluated to determine the child records.  At this second level, only KING's post of PRESIDENT, he is the one who would have no record of the child and this WORK PRECONDITION = PRESIDENT will be valid for all records under the 2 KING level.

  This model keeps occurring under each folder KING indefinitely.

• CONNECT IN a loop in the user data

  Could someone help me because I can not find a solution.

  I want to build a tree of 3 tables (parent-> children-> detail)

  Everything works fine with 2 tables, but when I add the third table I get always an error ORA: ORA-01436: CONNECT BY a loop in the user data

  CREATE TABLE nineham (organisatie_id NUMBER

  (, naam VARCHAR2 (50));

  --

  CREATE TABLE seizoenen (seizoen_id NUMBER

  organisatie_id NUMBER

  (, naam VARCHAR2 (50));

  --

  CREATE TABLE competities (competitie_id NUMBER

  seizoen_id NUMBER

  (, naam VARCHAR2 (50));

  --

  INSERT INTO nineham (organisatie_id, name) VALUES (1, 'ORGANISATIE_1');

  INSERT INTO nineham (organisatie_id, name) VALUES (2, 'ORGANISATIE_2');

  --

  INSERT INTO seizoenen (seizoen_id, organisatie_id, naam) VALUES (1, 1, 'SEIZOEN_1');

  INSERT INTO seizoenen (seizoen_id, organisatie_id, naam) VALUES (2, 1, 'SEIZOEN_2');

  INSERT INTO seizoenen (seizoen_id, organisatie_id, naam) VALUES (1, 2, 'SEIZOEN_3');

  INSERT INTO seizoenen (seizoen_id, organisatie_id, naam) VALUES (2, 2, 'SEIZOEN_4');

  --

  INSERT INTO competities (competitie_id, seizoen_id, naam) VALUES (1, 1, 'COMPETITIE_1');

  INSERT INTO competities (competitie_id, seizoen_id, naam) VALUES (2, 1, 'COMPETITIE_2');

  INSERT INTO competities (competitie_id, seizoen_id, naam) VALUES (3, 2, 'COMPETITIE_3');

  INSERT INTO competities (competitie_id, seizoen_id, naam) VALUES (4, 2, "COMPETITIE_4");

  INSERT INTO competities (competitie_id, seizoen_id, naam) VALUES (5, 2, "COMPETITIE_5");

  --

  --

  --

  SELECT LPAD (' ', LEVEL * 2, ' ') | Naam AS display

  LEVEL AS lvl

  DE)

  SELECT NULL AS parent

  child organisatie_id

  naam

  To nineham

  UNION ALL

  SELECT organisatie_id AS parent

  child seizoen_id

  naam

  OF seizoenen

  UNION ALL

  Seizoen_id SELECT parent

  Child AS NULL

  naam

  OF competities

  )

  START WITH parent IS NULL

  CONNECT BY PRIOR child = parent

  ;

  Hello

  When you perform a CONNECT BY query, you must have an identifier unique to each child.  You use numbers that are unique to each table, but are no longer unique when you UNION the paintings together.  When the query finds children 1, the fact that average organisatie_id = 1, or does that mean seizoen_id = 1, or does this mean competetite_id = 1?

  Etbin suggested you change data.  Which can be difficult; It might not even be possible.  In addition, you must make sure that the new IDS are unique.  When you assign advent = 10 to a node, for example, you must be sure that 10 is not an organisatie_id.

  Here is another solution that is guarranted to generate unique IDS, without changing the actual tables:

  SELECT LPAD (' ', LEVEL * 2, ' ') | Naam AS display

  LEVEL AS lvl

  DE)

  SELECT NULL AS parent

  organisatie_id AS child

  , 1 AS the level of

  naam

  To nineham

  UNION ALL

  SELECT organisatie_id AS parent

  seizoen_id AS child

  , 2 AS the level of

  naam

  OF seizoenen

  UNION ALL

  SELECT seizoen_id AS parent

  Child AS NULL

  , 3 AS the level of

  naam

  OF competities

  )

  START WITH parent IS NULL

  AND level = 1

  CONNECT BY PRIOR child = parent

  AND layer = FIRST + 1

  ;

  The composite key formed by your original ID, and the new level number is unique.

  Note that the query above is exactly what you have posted, with the addition of the lines that refer to level.

• Hi, do an error-ORA-01436: CONNECT BY a loop in the user data

  Hi, I am getting an error when executing the select query
  
  SELECT callreleasetime, calleventduration
  OF temp_med_partial_records_0001
  CONNECT BY PRIOR Callreleasetime = callreleasetime
  AND IMSI PRIOR = IMSI
  AND PRIOR connectedcallingnumber = connectedcallingnumber
  
  Published by: user8731258 on February 8, 2011 02:34

  example:

  drop table test;
  
  create table test(no number, IMSP number,  IMSC number,  data varchar2(10));
  
  insert into test values(1,1,2,'a');
  insert into test values(1,2,3,'a');
  insert into test values(1,2,4,'a');
  
  insert into test values(1,3,5,'b');
  insert into test values(1,4,5,'b');
  
  insert into test values(2,1,2,'c');
  insert into test values(2,2,3,'c');
  
  insert into test values(4,1,2,'d');
  insert into test values(4,2,3,'d');
  
  insert into test values(5,1,2,'e');
  insert into test values(5,2,3,'e');
  insert into test values(5,2,3,'e');
  
  insert into test values(6,1,2,'f');
  
  commit;
  

  SELECT *
  FROM test
  CONNECT BY PRIOR no=no
  AND PRIOR IMSP=IMSC
  AND PRIOR data=data;
  
  NO                     IMSP                   IMSC                   DATA
  ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ----------
  1                      1                      2                      a
  1                      2                      3                      a
  1                      1                      2                      a
  1                      2                      4                      a
  1                      1                      2                      a
  1                      3                      5                      b
  1                      4                      5                      b
  2                      1                      2                      c
  2                      2                      3                      c
  2                      1                      2                      c
  4                      1                      2                      d
  4                      2                      3                      d
  4                      1                      2                      d
  5                      1                      2                      e
  5                      2                      3                      e
  5                      1                      2                      e
  5                      2                      3                      e
  5                      1                      2                      e
  6                      1                      2                      f   
  

  Your case

  SELECT *
  FROM test
  CONNECT BY PRIOR no=no
  AND PRIOR IMSP=IMSP
  AND PRIOR data=data;
  
  ORA-01436:
  

• error ORA-01436: CONNECT BY a loop in the user data

  Y is it breaks down, when the query with the data of test works well. Added the result of individual queries of the database.
  times parent_order and the order can be same.
  

  SELECT *
    FROM (SELECT     *
                FROM r_brj_linkage
          START WITH order_id = 'IQBGSR20'
          CONNECT BY PRIOR parent_downstream_orderid = order_id)
   WHERE alternate_linkage_rule_flag = 'N'
  
  SELECT parent_downstream_orderid, order_id, alternate_linkage_rule_flag
    FROM r_brj_linkage
   WHERE order_id = 'IQBGSR20';
  output 
  ------------
  U206650.3     IQBGSR20   Y
  
  
  SELECT parent_downstream_orderid, order_id, alternate_linkage_rule_flag
    FROM r_brj_linkage
   WHERE order_id = 'U206650.3';
  
  U206650.3      U206650.3  N

  I tried with an example, and gives me the correct results

  SELECT *
    FROM (WITH t AS
               (SELECT 'XXX' parent_1, 'YYY' child_1, 'Y' flag
                  FROM DUAL
                UNION ALL
                SELECT 'XYZ' AS parent_1, 'XXX' AS child_1, 'Y' AS flag
                  FROM DUAL
                UNION ALL
                SELECT 'ZZZ' AS parent_1, 'XYZ' AS child_1, 'Y' AS flag
                  FROM DUAL
                UNION ALL
                SELECT 'ABC' AS parent_1, 'ZZZ' AS child_1, 'N' AS flag
                  FROM DUAL)
          SELECT     *
                FROM t
          START WITH child_1 = 'ZZZ'
          CONNECT BY PRIOR parent_1 = child_1)
   WHERE flag = 'N';

  Published by: devarade on January 21, 2010 14:56
  
  Published by: devarade on January 21, 2010 15:06

  Ah, see what you mean now.

  How about this:

  SELECT *
  FROM  ( WITH t AS
               ( SELECT 'XXX' parent_1, 'YYY' child_1, 'Y' flag
                 FROM DUAL
                 UNION ALL
                 SELECT 'XYZ', 'XXX', 'Y' FROM DUAL UNION ALL
                 SELECT 'ZZZ', 'XYZ', 'Y' FROM DUAL UNION ALL
                 SELECT 'ZZZ', 'ZZZ', 'N' FROM DUAL )
          SELECT *
          FROM   t
          START WITH child_1 = 'YYY'
          CONNECT BY NOCYCLE PRIOR NULLIF(parent_1,child_1) = child_1 )
  WHERE flag = 'N';
  

• Hierarchical query, connect in a loop in the user data

  Hello
  
  Is there a method to find the node that has the problem in the application of the factorial.
  
  As my data is complex and has up to 10 levels, it is not possbile to correct manually. I have idendtified the series 'START WITH', what is causing the problem. But I couldn't find the correct nodes in the seris that creates the loop.
  
  Does not not in the management of exceptions even.
  
  Please advice.
  
  Kind regards
  Benz

  You did not specify a version, but the operators CONNECT BY NOCYCLE and CONNECT_BY_ISCYCLE can be used to detect cycles.

• Error (21,100): PL/SQL: ORA-00997: illegal use of the LONG data type

  CREATE or REPLACE (name in varchar2) procedure Compress_tab_partition
  is
  last_mnth_var varchar2 (8);
  curr_mnth_var varchar2 (8);
  number of last_mnth;
  number of curr_mnth;
  last_partition varchar2 (8);
  high_val varchar2 (4000);
  Start

  Select to_char (add_months (trunc (sysdate, 'MM'),-1), 'YYYYMM') | ' 00' in the double last_mnth_var;
  Select to_char (sysdate, 'YYYY') | TO_CHAR (sysdate, 'mm') | ' 00' in the double curr_mnth_var;
  Select to_number (last_mnth_var) in the double last_mnth;
  Select to_number (curr_mnth_var) in the double curr_mnth;

  Dbms_output.put_line ('Compression of GOLDMGR Table scores.' | table-name |) "to go". ») ;
  Dbms_output.put_line(' ');

  / * Step 1 - identify the name of the partition of the specified table must be compressed * /.
  Select high_value from high_val from user_tab_partitions where table_name = table-name;
  Select nom_partition into last_partition from user_tab_partitions where table_name = table-name and high_value = rtrim (high_val);

  / * Step 2 - Alter partition table to compress * /.

  run immediately "ALTER TABLE GOLDMGR." | table_name | ' CHANGE THE PARTITION '. last_partition | "COMPRESS by low query";

  / * Step 3 - Index rebuild step * /.

  I'm in (select index_name in user_indexes where table_name = table-name)
  loop
  run immediately "ALTER INDEX GOLDMGR." | i.index_name |' REBUILD ";
  end loop;

  Dbms_output.put_line (' COMPLETED: compress the Table partitions change.) ") ;

  end;
  /

  I'm getting an error like: Error (21,100): PL/SQL: ORA-00997: illegal use of the LONG data type

  Please resolve.

  HIGH_VALUE datatype is LONG. You may not use for a long TIME in WHERE clause expressions. You need to loop through the partitions by selecting HIGH_VALUE and then comparing. Secondly, there is no need to select double to calculate expressions. For example:

  Select to_char (add_months (trunc (sysdate, 'MM'),-1), 'YYYYMM') | ' 00' in the double last_mnth_var;

  should be replaced by

  last_mnth_var: = to_char (add_months (trunc (sysdate, 'MM'),-1), 'YYYYMM') | ' 00'.

  and there is no need to add_months here:

  last_mnth_var: = to_char (trunc (sysdate, 'MM') - 1, "YYYYMM"). ' 00'.

  But the main question is simply ALTER TABLE MODIFY PARTITION COMPRESS allows compression but does not compress. You must issue ALTER TABLE MOVE PARTITION COMPRESS:

  SQL > create table tbl (n) partition by range (n)
  2 (partition p1 values less than (maxvalue))
  3. Select lpad('X',4000,'X') from dual connect by level<=>
  4.

  Table created.

  SQL > select bytes
  2 from WHERE user_segments
  3 where nom_segment = 'TBL '.
  4 and nom_partition = 'P1 '.
  5.

  BYTES
  ----------
  830472192

  SQL > alter table tbl
  2. change the partition p1 compress
  3.

  Modified table.

  SQL > select bytes
  2 from WHERE user_segments
  3 where nom_segment = 'TBL '.
  4 and nom_partition = 'P1 '.
  5.

  BYTES
  ----------
  830472192

  SQL > alter table tbl
  2. move the partition p1 compress
  3.

  Modified table.

  SQL > select bytes
  2 from WHERE user_segments
  3 where nom_segment = 'TBL '.
  4 and nom_partition = 'P1 '.
  5.

  BYTES
  ----------
  8388608

  SQL >

  SY.

• Unable to connect even after the user password reset

  Hai all,
  
  10.2.0.3 on Linux
  
  Reset a user password and the user is unable to connect as you can see below
  
  
  [oracle@testdb 10.2.0] $ sqlplus sys/Manager as sysdba
  
  SQL * more: release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production on Tue Nov 27 16:20:21 2012
  
  Copyright (c) 1982, 2006, Oracle. All rights reserved.
  
  
  Connected to:
  Oracle Database 10 g Enterprise Edition release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
  With partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
  
  SQL > alter user sysman identified by oracle.
  
  Modified user.
  
  SQL > disconnected from Oracle Database 10 g Enterprise Edition release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
  With partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
  
  [oracle@testdb 10.2.0] $ sqlplus sysman/oracle
  
  SQL * more: release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production on Tue Nov 27 16:20:32 2012
  
  Copyright (c) 1982, 2006, Oracle. All rights reserved.
  
  ERROR:
  ORA-01017: name of user and password invalid. connection refused
  
  
  
  Unable to connect even after the user password reset

  Check
  How to change the password of the database user Sysman (DB control repository schema) [ID 259379.1]
  EMCA 11 g fails with the error "ORA-01017: name of user and password invalid; connection refused"and" username/password invalid name; For DBSNMP or user SYSMAN"[ID 741530.1]

• ORA-00997: illegal use of the LONG data type

  Hi all

  11.2.0.1

  ALTER TABLE SAFDB MOVE TABLESPACE DATA_TS_ENC

  *

  ERROR on line 1:

  ORA-00997: illegal use of the LONG data type

  Why illegal? How can I move this table?

  Thank you very much

  pK

  Take a look who

  http://aprakash.WordPress.com/2011/01/06/how-to-move-table-containing-long-or-LOB-columns/

  Concerning

• Mobile Xperia Z2 D6502 unable Email data connection application to the user after the restriction.

  Hello

  I use D6502 Z2 Xperia.

  E-mail application default of the Xperia unable to use the Mobile data connection after she returned to "Restrict the database" defined.

  It works fine with WiFi. I tried resetting the application Email and MS Exchange Service, but the problem is still there.

  Is there a solution for this problem.

  This problem has been resolved after update to Android (Lolipop) 5. Thanks Sony.

• Error when the connection that reads the user profile service service has no logon. User profile cannot be loaded

  I've worked on my computer fine all day and then went to log on to the evening and received this message. When I look on user profiles it shows my user as a 'backup '. I have a lot of documents and emails that I need. Is there a way to fix this, other than to create a new account and delete the old one?

  Hello

  The data is still there and accessible by any admin look under C:\Users account where C: is
  the drive where the profiles of users (folders).

  You can try to fix it with Safe Mode - repeatedly press F8 as you bootup. Also the ADMINISTRATOR account of
  Safe mode has no password by default unless someone has changed.

  These problems and similar bugs can help:

  A temporary profile is loaded after you connect to a Windows Vista-based system
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/947242

  How to fix error "your user profile was not loaded correctly! You have been connected with a
  temporary profile. "in Vista
  http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/135858-user-profile-error-logged-temporary-profile.html

  Some programs such as the updated Google (if you added the toolbar Google, Chrome or Google Earth)
  has been known to cause this problem.

  How to fix error "the user profile Service has no logon. Profile of user cannot
  be responsible. »
  http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/130095-user-profile-service-failed-logon-user-profile-cannot-loaded.html

  -----------------------------------------------

  Other methods:

  Use the hidden administrator account to lower your user account (to the lowest level) APPLY/OK then go back
  and reset it to the Admin APPLY/OK - this clearly allows corruption. Do this several times. Do the same for others
  accounts that may be difficult. If necessary you can also reset your password in the accounts.
  Do not forget to leave your Admin account and the other to the desired level.

  Make another Admin account with your password and use it to fix the others if necessary. (just for
  repair, don't use regular account, not a safety valve) always keep a spare ADMIN account.

  DO NOT LEAVE THE ENABLED LSA OR USE DAILY. If it corrupts you are toast!

  How to enable or disable the real built-in Administrator account in Vista
  http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/67567-administrator-account.html

  You can run the Admin account hidden from the prompt by if necessary.

  This tells you how to access the System Recovery Options and/or a Vista DVD
  http://windowshelp.Microsoft.com/Windows/en-us/help/326b756b-1601-435e-99D0-1585439470351033.mspx

  If you cannot access your old account, you can still use an Admin to migrate to another (do not forget to always
  not that an Admin account that is not used except for testing and difficulty).

  Difficulty of a corrupted user profile
  http://windowshelp.Microsoft.com/Windows/en-AU/help/769495bf-035C-4764-A538-c9b05c22001e1033.mspx

  I hope this helps.

  Rob Brown - MS MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Bike - Mark Twain said it right.