Outbreak of several sources of relaxation?

Similar Questions

• several sources triggers digital i/o card

  I use the NOR-HSDIO Express (Acquisition) with map of the e/s high-speed digital (pxi-6542), to a Logic Analyzer.  It works fine but I need to use more than 1 source of relaxation, for example when 3 signals go data capture high (rising edge).  I don't see a way to do it in the window properties HSDIO Express, any ideas please?

  Hey svt4cobra6,

  I would recommend that you first find the summary of triggers using HSDIO page, and I think that you want to use a Model Match Trigger. Then you should check the Model Match Start Trigger (or similar reference C ) specific help. This trigger allows you to use a row of data to look at multiple sources of relaxation at the same time. So, if you have additional data lines, then use 3 of them and use the 'R' or 'r' in your start of model match trigger. For example do not care your pattern corresponds to 3 rows of data where there is a rising edge on the 3 lines at the same time could look like this, where 'x' is:

  "xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xRRR.

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards

  DJ L.

• Error handling in QMH projects with several sources of error

  Hi guys,.

  I have a head scratcher:

  QMH architecture, I have a state machine that describes a certain task of legislation on different instruments.

  Each of these instruments has its own message loop vi management and each of these loops could cause errors.

  I want to pass these errors to the state machine (VI main if you want) in order to take appropriate action or - at least - inform the user what the error instrument came. Currently, I use a global variable for each error source and merge errors in primary VI.

  Problem: Multiple errors, only the one connected to the first entry of the fusion VI errors is displayed.

  What is the best way to get errors from several sources to level superior screw and keep all the error information for debugging purposes?

  Thank you!

  
  

• Can drag you several sources to a target?

  Hello

  I am using Captivate 8 and I have a drag and drop the whole upward. Can drag you several sources (correct answers) in a target? Or each source must have its own target?

  Thank you

  Kristen

  Yes, you can. Check out the demos here by Jennifer Dr.Pooja.

  Adobe Captivate help | Drag-and-drop interaction

  Anthony

• A tutorial / sample to create a single PDF of several source files using assembler PDF in a process of control folder.

  A tutorial / sample to create a single PDF of several source files using assembler PDF in a process of control folder. I have a client application that will prepare the number of source files and metadata information (in. (XML) that will be used in the header/footer. Is it possible to set a run time generated shows the DDX file in the folder and use it in the process. If possible how can I pass the file names in the DDX. Any sample process will be very useful.

  If possible, make use of the API of the assembler in your client application instead of doing this using watched folder. Here are examples of the assembler: LiveCycle ES2.5 * programming with LiveCycle ES2.5

  The record can accept zip files (example: configuration of a control folder to manage several input files and write the results to a single folder |) Adobe LiveCycle Blog ). You can also use run the script to create the DDX when executing: LiveCycle ES2 * Application Development using LiveCycle Workbench ES2

  Thank you

  Wasil

• Partition of several source BSO cubes to a single target ASO cube

  All,
  
  I want to use Essbase 11.x to create a partition strategy which has several sources (all with the same number of dimensions) BSO cubes partitioned in a single target ASO cube, which has the extra dimensions that source BSO cubes. Is this possible?
  
  
  
  Thank you

  Yes, you can certainly extend servers.

• Acquisition keep repeated samples Source of relaxation

  Hello

  I found this article http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/epd/p/id/5009, and the vi attached to it will do what I need.  I want to acquire continuous samples at a sampling rate specific based on an external trigger on PFI0.  Pretty simple things.  However, the trigger on PFI0 signal repeat at regular intervals (every 0.1 seconds or more).  I want the vi to acquire all the time but to be triggered on the first instance of the trigger on PFI0, then to ignore the rest of Extensible triggers.  It may acquire up to 10 seconds after this initial trigger, and after the time has expired, that I will call the DAQmx clear task vi.

  The vi of this article will do this, or should be changed in any way to accept only the first instance of relaxation?

  Thank you.

  Steve

  You're in luck.  In response to the 1st relaxation and ignoring the following are normal behavior by default.  On several occasions of the additional work of trigger (and CQI data compatible hw) to set up.

  So yes, the trigger in the article you linked should work as you want.  Note, however, that the example is designed to use an external signal like a sample clock.  If you just want to use the synchronization engine internal to the Commission for a specified sampling rate, you can specify "OnboardClock" as the Source of the clock on the façade.

  -Kevin P

• Clip of MultiCam, but with audio from SEVERAL sources at the same time?

  I recorded a seminar using several audio and video sources. Audio sources include a wire tie, room microphone and read directly from a computer.

  I got all the raw materials imported into FCPX and created a multicam clip, and everything is synchronized perfectly.

  For the video, I know how to make the cut between my different cameras.

  But for audio, I would be able to play several audio channels at once - namely, lapel mic and the mic to the audience. How can I do this?

  I know I could put the multicam audio clip: setback (for example) then also drag the microphone to the audience for the game. But that means every time I make an edit, I have to make it through two sources and must be absolutely sure that they fall never out of sync.

  I guess I could drag the multicam clip in the timeline twice (one above the other, so two are playing simultaneously), with a video source set to none. But the same problem - I always have to be very careful with the changes, two parallel versions never move out of sync.

  Is there a better way to do it?

  There are also sometimes I can do some automation of the volume of the different channels... so everything what you are proposing, please keep this in mind.

  Thank you!

  In fact with a multicam clip you need not "stuff" to work with multiple audio. It has excellent support directly in the application.

  See Steve Martin explain this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HE4FRDMJBS0

• Create the header package or body of several sources in 11 G files?

  I am new to Oracle and although the concept of a package is quite simple (I think than just DLL), it seems terribly cumbersome to have to put all the code for the header or body of a package in a single file. I have a few hundred functions and procedures in the package and it would be nice to be able to split the source into multiple files. I was not able to find a reference to this feature anywhere. Is this possible?
  
  As an aside, I was going to put all my routines for a particular application in a single package. Is this a common practice, or he normally get broken down more than this?

  Hello

  You want to have hundreds of functions and procedures in the same package?
  A lot of people would create several packages, each with less procedures.

  You can call one script from another. Just put a line containing

  @pk_foo_part_2
  

  anywhere inside the pk_foo_part_1.sql, and every time that you run pk_foo_part_1.sql, then pk_foo_part_2.sql will be executed also.

  If you use two @ signs instead of one, it means that the file is located in the same folder as the appellant.
  In general, I have at least 4 scripts per package:
  (1) a main script, which calls (2), (3) and (4) and grants privileges
  (2) a script to create the head of package
  (3) a script to create the package body
  (4) a script to test the package. He often calls other scripts to test individual procedures, which sometimes rely on other scripts. If there is a limit to how deeply script calls can be nested, I've never met it.

  Only (1) is called a full path name with a single sign. @ all others are called using the @ and the simple name of the script.

  See the [SQL * Plus manual | http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b31189/ch12002.htm#sthref1065] to learn more.

• Several Sources for Discoverer

  Being new discoverer but familiar with most large tools like Cognos, BO BI, MicroStrategy etc, I have a question about the generation of reports with multiple data sources. Can the discoverer be directed towards several databases (for example MS SQL and Oracle) to a single report or the semantic layer? If I want a report on the activities of the client and a part of this activity is in each database, I can join the database tables (4 or 5 or N number of tables) on the appropriate identification fields and create a single layer for the writers of the report to look? How many sources can I enroll?
  
  Thank you very much
  JM

  Hello

  Discoverer uses a Layer (EUL) of the end user who is a semantic layer for reports and is stored in a set of tables in an Oracle database. The only way that discoverer may report multiple sources of data is to use a configuration of database links in the Oracle database that point to other data sources. You can then select the data sources when you map files in the EUL. Once files are set up you can report it to the coast of multiple data sources.

  Rod West

• Outbreak of several digital lines of a single window using PCI 6353

  Hello

  I use a PCI 6353 to control a laser for a PIV system. The laser requires 4 pulses (F1, F2, T1, T2) on different channels. It would be easy using 4 counters on the Board, but I also need to trigger the camera. The card has a lot of output digital, so I thought I could use 2 meters and four digital outputs.

  I thought that, by setting the pulse counter from 0 at a time duration between F1 and T1 and triggering a rising edge and T1 F1 a front down using output internal), I would be able to solve the problem. However, the system I cannot trigger the two lines of the same internal output. I don't know why. I have attached two vi, one for a single channel that works very well and the other with two channels. I am also attaching a diagram of approximate time of my proposed solution.

  I am not absolutely put on this format, so if this is not possible and you have another solution, please let me know. Accuracy is the key here, the widths of pulse being about 1 microsecond and the intervals between F1 and Q1 being approximately 10 microseconds, so I think the hardware timing is essential. However, I'm not quite clear on interact it with the digital pulses and counters.

  Kind regards

  Joe

  Hey Joe,

  All the lines that you want to use for quick time ARE on the 6353 must be in the same spot.  Unfortunately, you can't start or clock several lines independently.

  That said, I think that the simplest solution would be to simply create a waveform suitable for generating all 6 signals with.  You should be able to clock up to 10 MHz, which gives you 100 ns resolution.  If you need 1 us resolution, then you could get by synchronizing the c to 1 Mhz.  While you could technically use a combination of counters and to get what you need, it should not be necessary in your case.  All you need is a single task with the waveform appropriate to generate your desired signals.

  Best regards

• Outbreak of several boards of Directors

  Hello

  I have a PXI-1033 chassis with a digital map of the PXI-6534 and an analog card of the PXI-6733 and am using DAQmx and LabVIEW 2010 (I'm fairly new to both). I try to sync the series of ~ 1 min output digital and analog with a temporal resolution of 1us topic. To store the value of each channel to each 1us need more memory cards would, so I've set up a trigger to tell them when a channel needs to change.

  Currently, the way I put it in place is the following: the berries of the analog and digital output are loaded on the cards, and they are configured for output with examples of clock accepting an input external trigger (PFI2 and PFI5, respectively). One of the digital output lines on the 6733 is configured for an output pulse whenever a channel needs to change. This line is connected to PFI2 on the 6534 and PFI5 on the 6733.

  It works as expected, but I have a few questions:

  (1) for the time being, I'm using an external function generator clocked at 1 MHz as the clock to the digital output on the 6733 (who acts as a trigger). I had rather not need an external device to do: is there an internal clock on maps or in the PXI chassis that I can use instead? I tried to select "OnboardClock" as the source for the sample clock VI, but it gave an error: "terminal Source routing is not found on the device."

  (2) is there a way to route signals from triggering internally, rather than having the BNC cables between boards? (This is less important; it is more a cosmetic problem).

  Any help is appreciated :-)

  Rob

  
  

• Several sources of data for Dimension - Fragmentation

  Hello-

  I have a requirement where I have 2 tables to a dimension, say a customer table. Table Customer has information for all customers except those that begin by me '. Customer_M table has information for all customers whose names begin with M. when I pull the measure by the fact, he should get the customer information in the tables.

  It is how I implemented: in the layer physical, I defined the relationship between the customer 1) and done and 2) Customer_M done. In the MDB layer I had imagined a dimension for customer (Customer_id, client_name - columns) as well as the hierarchy. Then I added the Customer_M as another data source in the same dimension, mapping the same Customer_id and client_name. I did not the hierarchy when I traced the second data source.

  I have 2 queries to be one with the Customer table and the other created with Customer_M table, both to be United. But I don't have a single application with the client.

  I tried to implement the content of Fragmentation as well as data source with a check mark on "this source must be combined with other sources at this level." It does not work.

  What I am doing wrong.

  Can someone please.

  Thank you.

  Usually the Fragmentation is to go when sources with the same structure and with different data, in your case I don't see same structure.

  This might be the reason why you're not able to get as expected.

  Thank you

  http://cool-bi.com

• Several Sources of the logical Table in MDB under 1 logic Table in OBIEE 11 g

  I have a question, and even after doing a lot of research on google I couldn't find any article by asking you: -.
  
  I want to create a logical Dimension table
  This logical dimension has columns from 2 different physical tables, TableA and TableB. The relationship between TableA to TableB is 1 to zero.
  
  There are 2 ways to create the logical dimension:--
  1) go to the properties of logical TableA table-> then source it + sign click and then add the right outer join TableB, tableA with.
  We see here a tableA table in the logical table source.
  (2) so that we have 2 logical table source, drag the column tableB.
  
  Please try to explain without using the concept of fragmentation and without taking into account the fact tables. I have a question for the simple logical dimension only tables.
  
  I wanted to know which is the right path and what requirement/factor decides what to do?

  See this post
  Business Model - Table logic Source

  Let me know for Qs.

  If brand as helping correct :)

• Several Sources of Table unique logic vs logical Source of Table

  OBIEE 11 g. I'm totally confused. Can someone help me with the following for me.
  
  I saw sources of logical table used in 2 ways. I have a table of 2 sources: CUSTOMER & ADDRESS. In the physical layer these 2 tables are related by _ID CUSTOMER in a 1:M relationship.  for example, a customer can have many addresses.
  
  Scenario # 1: MDB two tables form a logical table called CUSTOMER with 2 different sources logical tables that are CUSTOMER and ADDRESS.
  
  Scenario # 2: MDB two tables form a logical table named CUSTOMER with 1 table logic source called CLIENT only.
  
  What is the difference between the above 2 scenarios and what is the best to use to create the logical table source.
  
  Kind regards.

  Scenario # 1: MDB two tables form a logical table called CUSTOMER with 2 different sources logical tables that are CLIENT & ADDRESS.
  --> In this case; based on the selection of source columns is defined in the physical request
  possible case would be customer, ADDRESS and ADDRESS of the SUBSCRIBER &
  --> Of standardized scenarios used in
  --> BI uses intelligence according to the settings on the content tab

  Scenario # 2: MDB two tables form a logical table named CUSTOMER with 1 table logic source called CLIENT only.
  --> In this case; CLIENT properties-> general tab used both ADDRESS CUSTOMER & in your physical query two tables regardless of column selection
  --> Standardized scenarios used in
  --> Forcing BI to follow our path, since we usually set the settings on the content tab

  Hope this helps