Palo

Similar Questions

• Equivalent of Palo Alto Cisco ASA packet - trace

  Hi all

  Does anyone know if the 3020 Palo Alto boxes have a feature equivalent to the ASA Cisco Packet-trace?

  Thank you very much

  I used the cli command "test security-policy-match" that identifies the specific policy rule corresponds to a pair of source and destination traffic counter.  You must ensure that you specify all of the fields (area, src/dst network, Protocol and ports.

• Configuration of the L3 Switch to send the traffic to Palo Alto

  

  Please forgive my ignorance when it comes to Palo Alto. This is the first time that I do business with them. We need to ensure one VLAN located behind the Palo Alto. I am including a diagram to show a simulation of what we seek to do. We have by default VLAN1 which is our default data VLAN. We have 19 VLAN is VLAN we want it secure. The VLAN1 SVI IP is 10.1.1.1 and VLAN19 SVI IP is 10.1.2.1. On the Palo Alto, we have an IP interface was like 10.1.1.2 for default data VLAN and 10.1.2.2 for the VLAN secure. There are also a pair of HA with IPS 10.1.1.3 and 10.1.2.3 respectively. We have EIGRP that announces the network default VLAN1. Here's what we want to do. Anything from the 10.1.1.x network, go to the 10.1.2.x network, must pass through the Palo Alto. Whatever either from the 10.1.2.x network, must go through the Palo Alto as well. Nothing to any other network 10.1.1.x, takes the route by default (and), and anything from 10.1.2.x to anything else on 10.1.2.x should stay local to the LAN (not pass through Palo Alto. Need just for the MAC address arp). My question is, how do I tell my L3 switch to send all traffic created in the 10.1.2.x, through the Palestinian Authority? I can't do an IP route because from the local network VIRTUAL lives on these L3 switches and is a directly connected route. Really, I can't do the ACB on the switch, because that is really meant to routers. I can put a long match, for everything on the 10.1.2.x network (i.e. the route ip 10.1.2.7 255.255.255.255 10.1.1.2), but for some reason when do whatsoever of 10.1.2.x another thing goes on 10.1.2.x through the palo alto so. Anyone have any suggestions on what would be the best practice, from a network perspective, on how to do this? Thanks for any help!

  Looks like you want all traffic to and from the secure virtual local network to pass through the firewall of your description?

  I'm not familiar with Palo Alto firewall is so I don't know how they work in HA, IE. with other devices do you want to simply talk to a VIP which is responsible for two firewalls?

  In your example the two firewalls have an IP address per vlan, but always just use you one IP addresses for the end-end connectivity. I'll assume that you do, you may need to change, but when I say that I mean the one that reminds you of the devices for routing etc..

  So for all the traffic to and from the network 10.1.2.0/24 to go through the firewall, you must-

  (1) remove the battery switch the IVR for vlan 19. You need the firewall to be routing vlan not secure the 3750 s. You leave vlan 19 in the database for vlan.

  (2) point them vlan 19 customers as default gateway

  (3) addition of a route on the stack of 3750 for the network 10.1.2.0/24-

  IP route 10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0

  (4) if the 10.1.2.0/24 network needs to talk to other that 10.1.1.0/24 remote subnets, then for each of these networks the firewall should be a route. The syntax will not be IOS, but this should give you an idea-

  IP 10.1.1.1 road

  etc... for each remote network

  That means foregoing is all the traffic going and coming from 10.1.2.x customers to other subnets must go through the firewall. The customer traffic in the vlan secured to other clients in the vlan safe doesn't have to go the firewalls.

  Jon

• Problem with the integration of storage - suspicious on PALO adapters

  Hello

  I connect the UCS system storage with mds9124 between the two.

  So far, I joined 2 systems UCS, everything went smoothly.

  Now, the new system UCS arrived, it's the same as before, the only difference is that now we have PALO for the first time.

  Stanard configuration, service profiles, uplinks, etc and now I have a strange situation

  The MDS ports connected to ports of uplink CF on my 6120xp I don't see pwwn to my profile, only WWNs of ports uplink and vsan wwn connected service.

  NPIV is enabled of course, I tried to recreate the profiles to change wwpn-s pools, but no use UCS,... no configuration issues, the ports are on the rise, the associated service profiles... I'm really confused.

  I checked my setup with cisco guides ("design and deployment of a Cisco Unified Computing System SAN using MDS 9000 family switches Cisco"), but I don't see why it does not work.

  Any idea? In past configurations with MENLO adapters, everything went really good.

  Thank you

  It's the way palo works. You will see not Palo connect on the fabric until the drivers are loaded. In the case of SAN boot you need to create a specific boot strategy that assigns the logical unit number to the vhba and in this case, it is programmed and connection to the fabric for SAN boot.

  If you're just turn the blade and expecting Palo to connect on the fabric as a Menlo or Qlogic it won't do.

  Louis

• Select Cisco ASA to replace Palo Alto PA 500

  Hello world

  Pls suggest a Cisco ASA (equivalent or superior) 5500 series to replace the PA500. Thank you

  Palo Alto PA500

  • Firewall of 250 Mbit/s throughput (App - ID¹active)
  • 100 Mbps threat prevention throughput
  • 50 VPN IPSec Mbps throughput
  • 64 000 max sessions
  • 7 500 new sessions per second
  • Tunnels/tunnel VPN IPSec 250 interfaces
  • 100 users, SSL VPN
  • 3 virtual routers
  • Virtual systems (basic/max) N/A
  • 20 security zones
  • 1 000 maximum policies

  Hi you can opt for the Asa 5510 or Asa 5520 two of them correspond to your needs. Here is a link to their characteristics http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/asa-5500-serie... Aditya cordially

• UCS (PALO) VIC - associate a host

  Hello

  I have a server blade with the adapter of PALO (VIC) and I test the VN-link depending on the hardware...

  I configured everything according to the Guide of Configuration Cisco UCS - Configuration VN-link section

  I see the 2 vNIC on the ESX host, I created and then if I ssh in there and do an ifconfig I can see dynamic NIC (vf_vmnicX) - 20

  If the dynamic NETWORK cards are here.

  VMware, I see the dVS created in the UCS Manager and profiles of port (port groups)...

  My problem is when I try to associate the host to the DVS... If gives me an error and does not associate...

  Can someone help me here please?

  

  Thank you

  Nuno Ferreira

  Right, but you must always install the Nexus 1000v VEM, this is essential for communication of control between the ESX host and the 6100 s. The easiest way is to configure the source of VUM patch for the 1000v, then when you are adding a host to the successful UCSM dvSwitch VUM is called and the MEC is automatically installed.

• L2l vpn with Firewall Palo Alto

  I'm setting up a tunnel of l2l with a firewall of palo alto and evil.  It is a fairly simple installation, we are traffic encryption public to the public for download of the side sftp asa.  Here are the parts relevant to the config and various outputs...  Remote admin side asserts that the phase 1 pass and we have a timeout of waiting for phase 2.  Any help would be appreciated.

  1.1.1.1 (customer2 destination address)
  1.1.1.2 (customer2 vpn gateway)
  2.2.2.0 (space local public ip)

  description of CustomerVPN2 name 1.1.1.1 customer VPN2

  Inside_nat0_outbound to access extended list ip 2.2.2.0 allow 255.255.255.240 host CustomerVPN2
  Outside_4_cryptomap to access extended list ip 2.2.2.0 allow 255.255.255.240 host CustomerVPN2

  card crypto Outside_map 4 corresponds to the address Outside_4_cryptomap
  crypto map Outside_map 4 set type of connection are created only
  card crypto Outside_map 4 set peer 1.1.1.2
  card crypto Outside_map 4 the value transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA

  crypto ISAKMP policy 50
  preshared authentication
  aes-256 encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  life 86400

  tunnel-group 1.1.1.2 type ipsec-l2l
  1.1.1.2 tunnel-group ipsec-attributes
  pre-shared-key *.

  SH crypto isakmp (reviews listed as type: user)

  8 peer IKE: 1.1.1.2
  Type: user role: initiator
  Generate a new key: no State: MM_WAIT_MSG2

  Debug crypto ipsec (looks like he's trying all cryptographic cards except one)

  IPSec (crypto_map_check): crypto Outside_map 1 hole card no match for ACL Outside_1_cryptomap.

  IPSec (crypto_map_check): card crypto Outside_map 2 do not match for ACL Outside_2_cryptomap hole.

  IPSec (crypto_map_check): card crypto Outside_map 3 hole not correspond to ACL Outside_3_cryptomap.

  IPSec (crypto_map_check): card crypto Outside_map 3 hole not correspond to ACL OO_temp_Outside_map3.

  and finally.

  03 Oct 10:39:09 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.2, removing counterpart peer table faile
  d, no match!
  03 Oct 10:39:09 [IKEv1]: IP = 1.1.1.2, error: cannot delete PeerTblEntr

  Hey Evo,

  You asa public interface is the same as the public ip address that you are trying to encrypt?

  I think you need to create a Nat policy that can be a private ip address as well and then use it as your side of interesting traffic, because the Admin in Palo Alto is right about the vpn route accordingly.

  Here are some links for policy based Nat & paloalto side vpn screenshots and explanations.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00807d2874.shtml

  http://www.danielelonghi.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Howto-create-VPN-connection-between-JUNOS-and-paloalto.PDF

  http://netsecinfo.blogspot.com/2008/02/route-based-VPNs-explained.html

  Manish

• Palo Alto Global protect VPN is not compatible with Windows RT

  I'm not able to use this VPN product with my Tablet Surface RT.  Any ideas?

  DH

  Contact Palo Alto Global Connect.  They know their best products.

• Palo Alto / M81KR mezzanine and n1kv

  Hi all

  Whenever I try to install n1kv on a couple of blades B200 M2 with mezzanine M81KR, both boot from SAN, I get this error:

  "the vDS operation failed on the host hostnamexxxx, error in the configuration of the host. Got (vim.fault.PlatformConfigFault) exception.

  There is another B200 M2 blade in our configuration with card M72KR-Q (starting from local disks) and I can't install n1kv on no problem. I can also successfully install n1kv on C250 M2 in the same cluster and on a few other servers in a rack of an "other" provider.

  Here are the versions of software installed on all servers, with the exception of B200 M2 with card M72KR-Q:

  ESXi410-Update01 2011-02-14 T 11: 00:04 VMware ESXi 4.1 complete update 1
  VEM410-201101108-BG-2011-04-12 T 14: 16:23 Cisco Nexus 1000V 4.2 (1) SV1 (4)

  B200 M2 with card M72KR-Q running ESX, ESXi is not:

  ESX410-Update01 2011-02-14 T 09: 44:23 VMware ESX 4.1 full update 1
  VEM410-201101407-BG-2011-02-21 T 15: 27:56 Cisco Nexus 1000V 4.2 (1) SV1 (4)

  I already looked into this thread, but these tips did not help either:

  https://www.myciscocommunity.com/message/66949

  Other tips? M81KR would really be the culprit? (hard to believe, as it is the flagship product)

  Kind regards
  Radek

  Radek,

  Ensure that the Service profile for the host you are trying to add to the 1000 v is not having all configured dynamic vNIC .  If so, this will cause also the host could not be added to the DVS with the M81KR.  Your dynamic vNIC policy must be set on "no vNIC dynamic connection policy.

  Try what Manish suggested then by installing the appropriate software of VEM manually and then try to add the host.

  Kind regards

  Robert

• Not supported. of static vNIC to the Palo and Vic CNAs for ESX 5

  Hello

  I looked everywere see that clearly described. Most of the sources list only the no. dynamic vNIC taken in charge. Then I found a document describing the no. adapters for static and dynamic types for some operating systems and ESX 4. But not ESX 5. Someone at - it a CISCO document describing this? I think documentation is vey vague about that.

  If no doc, tdll just me, please... M81kr and CIV

  The calculation as Abi said is based on the number of uplinks recognized.

  The calculation is [15 * (number of links recognized IOM)]-2.

  1 uplink [15 * 1] = - 2 = 13 vNIC/vHBAs

  Uplink 2 = 15 * 2] - 2 = 28 vNIC/vHBAs

  4 uplink = [15 * 4] - 2 = 56 vNIC/vHBAs

  Source: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/sw/configuration_limits/2.0/b_UCS_Configuration_Limits_2_0.html

  Kind regards

  Robert

• Drivers Windows 2003 Palo (VIC)

  Anyone know if there is a driver Windows 2003 VIC? I background on Windows 2008 x 64 one on the UCS downloads page.

  Jeremy

  Windows 2003 is not an operating system that is supported for the VIC card and that's why drivers are not available.

  The support of the OS is made to http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/ps10265/ps10280/data_sheet_c78-525049.html

  -Matt

• Settings lost VPN - iOS 10.0.2

  I had stored in my iPad VPN settings. VPN connections worked well until the latest iOS update. Now ALL my VPN connections disappeared. To make it even worse-, I am unable to put once again, because there are new mandatory fields: VPN type and shared key. I don't have the slightest idea how to fill them because I never need them when connecting to the VPN through my iMac - please see the screenshot.

  It drives me crazy. I welcome any suggestion.

  Prepare for removal of PPTP VPN before upgrade you to iOS 10 and macOS Sierra

  Preparation for iOS system administrators 10 and macOS Sierra should stop using PPTP VPN connections. Learn about alternatives, you can use to protect your data.

  If you have configured a PPTP VPN server, 10 iOS and macOS users Sierra will not be able to connect to it. iOS 10 and macOS Sierra will remove any profile VPN PPTP connections when a user upgrades from their device.

  Even if the PPTP protocol is always available on iOS 9 or an earlier version or OS X El Capitan and earlier, we do not recommend that you use it for secure, private communication.

  Alternatives for PPTP VPN connections

  Try one of these other VPN protocols for authentication by user that are safer:

  • L2TP/IPSec
  • IKEv2/IPSec
  • Cisco IPSec
  • VPN SSL clients on the App Store, such as those of AirWatch, Aruba, Check Point, Cisco, F5 Networks, MobileIron, NetMotion, Open VPN, Palo Alto Networks, Pulse Secure and SonicWall

• Truck Series 2

  Hallo from Germany,

  today in 2 weeks, we will begin our roadtrip across California, Nevada... and my plan is to buy a Apple Watch series 2 as a birthday gift and a memory for me :-)

  Now, I saw in the online store that I'm not able to take one in a store at the moment. Same delivery takes 3-5 weeks.

  Is that at the time, you are not able to buy a Apple Watch series 2 in stores now?  How it will be in 2 to 4 weeks? We will begin our trip to SFO and will travel to Las Vegas (10 / 11 + 10/12), Los Angeles (10/19) and back to SFO. (10/22 - 10/25) If I could even pick it up in Palo Alto :-)

  Do you have recommendations for me, how do I get one?

  Thanks for your help!

  Hello

  I'm afraid that nobody here can tell you what the stock availability will be like in 2-4 weeks, either online or in-store (there is a community of support based on the user).

  Your best option might be to check the stock availability in stores at the time of (or just before) visiting every location along your route.

• VPN access no longer works after upgrade from 10 IOS!  Any input to fix?

  VPN access no longer works after update IOS 10!  With the help of an iPhone 5 or 6, our employees use their hotspot phone to connect to our VPN.  Suddenly, he broke Monday after the upgrade to IOS 10.  We have experienced many versions of IOS, and it has always worked.  Any patch available?

  Hello howlindaug,
  Thank you for using communities of Apple Support.

  If I understand your message that your employees will no longer be able to connect to your virtual private network with their iPhone 5 or 6 after the upgrade to iOS 10. Sierra Mac OS and iOS 10 delete a VPN profile PPTP connections when a user upgrades from their device. If your VPN is a PPTP connection, you'll want to use one of the options listed in the section below:

  Prepare for removal of PPTP VPN before upgrade you to iOS 10 and macOS Sierra
  

  Alternatives for PPTP VPN connections

  Try one of these other VPN protocols for authentication by user that are safer:

  • L2TP/IPSec
  • IKEv2/IPSec
  • Cisco IPSec
  • VPN SSL clients on the App Store, such as those of AirWatch, Aruba, Check Point, Cisco, F5 Networks, MobileIron, NetMotion, Open VPN, Palo Alto Networks, Pulse Secure and SonicWall

  Best regards.

• EPIC Browser (proxy) does not work on the Sierra

  I was with Epic browser (a browser works as a proxy or vpn) smoothly for the past few days in China to access Google and Facebook and a few pages that I've updated my mac OS previous to new sierra of mac OS. and sorry to say that then is no more working including proxy facilities. I can't explain how much I need in China. Can ' someone tell me why or how to fix it? He shows me just like this after I installed the OS Sierra...

  Hello firdaus, MD.
  Thank you for using communities of Apple Support.

  If I understand your message that you are no longer able to access the web using an epic browser that works as a proxy or VPN. With the update of the Sierra of macOS, PPTP VPN have been removed. If this browser uses this type of VPN, you may want to use one of the options listed in the section below:

  Prepare for removal of PPTP VPN before upgrade you to iOS 10 and macOS Sierra
  

  Alternatives for PPTP VPN connections

  Try one of these other VPN protocols for authentication by user that are safer:

  • L2TP/IPSec
  • IKEv2/IPSec
  • Cisco IPSec
  • VPN SSL clients on the App Store, such as those of AirWatch, Aruba, Check Point, Cisco, F5 Networks, MobileIron, NetMotion, Open VPN, Palo Alto Networks, Pulse Secure and SonicWall

  Best regards.