Perform a single task, if comparison 2d tables do not match

Similar Questions

• Select multiple channels for a single task - control and shift keys do not work

  Hello

  Following the advice of several other positions, I try to choose several physical channels in the drop-down list so that I can then use the function "unflatten channel channel" later. It seems that if I hold this key is pressed or cntrl, I should be able to select multiple channels in the list, however, this does not work for me. I tried to go in the "navigation key" property for the control channel to task, but there not all listed associations. Someone else has encountered this and found a solution?  I previously around that by declaring several channels by a colon (for example, ai1:3), but it does not work for the unflatten function.

  Thank you

  Claire.

  If I understand correctly, I think that you need to do is use a task property DAQmx. Try to use the channels property to get an array of strings.

• DataPump: Rows in tables do not match after importation

  Hello

  I have exported a schema 'ORAMSCA' and imported in the form of schema 'ORAMSCA_TEST151223 '. I found the difference between the rows of tables. Could you please advice.

  Here are the details.

  ORAMSCA_TEST151223 ORAMSCA
  COUNTY OF COUNTY OF TABLE_NAME
  ------------------------------ ------------- ------------
  2 952 3 367 OM_AUDIT_TRAIL
  33 40 OM_CONFIG_OPTIONS
  3 456 3 456 OM_COUNTRY_STATES
  86 91 OM_ENTITY_MENU
  64 69 OM_FUNFACTS
  81 61 OM_INSTANCES
  OM_JOBS 139 111
  OM_JOB_LOGS 226 132
  37 19 OM_JOB_PARAMS
  15 15 OM_LICENSES
  1 289 1 594 OM_LOGIN_HISTORY
  OM_LOOKUP_CODES 900 904
  31 31 OM_LOOKUP_TYPES
  9 625 8 225 OM_ORG_ORGANIZATIONS
  36 36 OM_ROLE_RIGHTS
  29 48 OM_USERS
  728 1 983 OM_USER_ENTITY_MENU_ACCESS
  OM_USER_ORGANIZATION_ACCESS 40 156

  
  

  Exported log file:

  ;;;

  Export: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production on Fri Dec 18 09:22:16 2015

  Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates.  All rights reserved.

  ;;;

  Connected to: Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64 bit Production

  With partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options

  Start "SYSTEM". "" SYS_EXPORT_SCHEMA_01 ": System / * schema = oramsca = ORAMSCA_TEST1.dmp = expdp.log = DUMP directory logfile dumpfile

  Current estimation using BLOCKS method...

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA

  Total estimation using BLOCKS method: 2,937 MB

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/USER

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/SYSTEM_GRANT

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/ROLE_GRANT

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/DEFAULT_ROLE

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLESPACE_QUOTA

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/PRE_SCHEMA/PROCACT_SCHEMA

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/DB_LINK

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/SEQUENCE/SEQUENCE of treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE processing

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/INDEX

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/CONSTRAINT/treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/STATISTICS/INDEX_STATISTICS of treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/PACKAGE/PACKAGE_SPEC of treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/FUNCTION/treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/PROCEDURE/treatment PROCEDURE

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/PACKAGE/COMPILE_PACKAGE/PACKAGE_SPEC/ALTER_PACKAGE_SPEC

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/FUNCTION/ALTER_FUNCTION of treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/PROCEDURE/ALTER_PROCEDURE processing

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/PACKAGE/PACKAGE_BODY of treatment

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/JAVA_SOURCE/JAVA_SOURCE

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/JAVA_CLASS/JAVA_CLASS

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/CONSTRAINT/REF_CONSTRAINT of treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/STATISTICS/TABLE_STATISTICS treatment

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "" OM_ORG_ORGANIZATIONS "8225 lines 620,3 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "" OM_AUDIT_TRAIL "3283 lines 285,2 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "' OM_ENTITY_MENU ' lines of 145,2 90 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "' OM_COUNTRY_STATES ' 3456 lines 186,1 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "" OM_CONFIG_OPTIONS "the 40 lines 67,10 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "' OM_LOGIN_HISTORY ' 118.2 lines 1525 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "' OM_LOOKUP_CODES ' 904 lines 68,61 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "' OM_USER_ENTITY_MENU_ACCESS ' 78.60 lines 1644 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "' OM_FUNFACTS ' lines of 15,06 67 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "' OM_INSTANCES ' lines of 17,37 61 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "' OM_JOBS ' 111 lines 19.54 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "' OM_JOB_LOGS ' 132 lines 19,02 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "' OM_JOB_PARAMS ' Ko 9,726, 19 ranks

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "" OM_LICENSES "15 lines 10,25 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "' OM_LOOKUP_TYPES ' 31 lines 11.50 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "' OM_ROLE_RIGHTS ' 36 lines 14,43 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "' OM_USERS ' 44 lines 21,57 KB

  . . exported "ORAMSCA." "' OM_USER_ORGANIZATION_ACCESS ' 147 lines 15,56 KB

  Main table 'SYSTEM '. "" SYS_EXPORT_SCHEMA_01 "properly load/unloaded

  ******************************************************************************

  Empty the file system set. SYS_EXPORT_SCHEMA_01 is:

  /U01/oracle11/dump/ORAMSCA_TEST1.dmp

  Work 'SYSTEM '. "" SYS_EXPORT_SCHEMA_01 "carried out at 09:23:14

  Import a log file:

  ;;;

  Import: Free 11.2.0.1.0 - Production Wed Dec 23 01:00:58 2015

  Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates.  All rights reserved.

  ;;;

  Connected to: Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64 bit Production

  With partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options

  Main table 'SYSTEM '. "' SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01 ' properly load/unloaded

  Start "SYSTEM". "" SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01 ": System / * Directory = DUMP dumpfile = logfile = impdp.log remap_schema = ORAMSCA:ORAMSCA_TEST151223 remap_tablespace = ORAMSCA:ORAMSCA_TEST151223 expdp_ORAMSCA_151221.dmp

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/USER

  ORA-31684: USER object Type: 'ORAMSCA_TEST151223' already exists

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/SYSTEM_GRANT

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/ROLE_GRANT

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/DEFAULT_ROLE

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLESPACE_QUOTA

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/PRE_SCHEMA/PROCACT_SCHEMA

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/DB_LINK

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/SEQUENCE/SEQUENCE of treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE processing

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_ORG_ORGANIZATIONS ' 9625 lines 724,5 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_AUDIT_TRAIL ' 258.6 lines 2952 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_ENTITY_MENU ' lines of 166.7 86 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_CONFIG_OPTIONS ' 33 lines 59,26 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_COUNTRY_STATES ' 3456 lines 186,1 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_LOGIN_HISTORY ' 102.8 lines 1289 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_LOOKUP_CODES ' 900 lines 68,36 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_USER_ENTITY_MENU_ACCESS ' 728 lines 39,46 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_FUNFACTS ' lines of 14.87 64 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_INSTANCES ' lines of 19.66 81 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_JOBS ' 139 lines 22,07 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_JOB_LOGS ' 226 KB 25,73 lines

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_JOB_PARAMS ' 37 lines 10,74 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "" OM_LICENSES "15 lines 10,25 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_LOOKUP_TYPES ' 31 lines 11.50 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_ROLE_RIGHTS ' 36 lines 14,43 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "' OM_USERS ' 29 ranks 19.38 KB

  . . imported "ORAMSCA_TEST151223." "" OM_USER_ORGANIZATION_ACCESS "the 40 lines 10.53 KB

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/INDEX

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/CONSTRAINT/treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/STATISTICS/INDEX_STATISTICS of treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/PACKAGE/PACKAGE_SPEC of treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/FUNCTION/treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/PROCEDURE/treatment PROCEDURE

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/PACKAGE/COMPILE_PACKAGE/PACKAGE_SPEC/ALTER_PACKAGE_SPEC

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/FUNCTION/ALTER_FUNCTION of treatment

  ORA-39083: Type than alter_function cannot be created with the object error:

  ORA-04052: error occurred when searching to the top of the remote object APPS. FND_APPLICATION_ALL_VIEW@SYSTEM_LINK_OM_VISMA

  ORA-00604: an error has occurred at the SQL level recursive 3

  ORA-12154: TNS: could not resolve the connect identifier specified

  Because sql is:

  ALTER FUNCTION "ORAMSCA_TEST151223". "" OM_APPLICATION_VISMA "PLSQL_OPTIMIZE_LEVEL = 2 PLSQL_CODE_TYPE = COMPILATION INTERPRETED PLSQL_DEBUG = FALSE PLSCOPE_SETTINGS = ' IDENTIFIERS: NO ' S REUSE

  ORA-39083: Type than alter_function cannot be created with the object error:

  ORA-04052: error occurred when searching to the top of the remote object APPS.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_V@SYSTEM_LINK_OM_VISMA

  ORA-00604: an error has occurred at the SQL level recursive 3

  ORA-12154: TNS: could not resolve the connect identifier specified

  Because sql is:

  ALTER FUNCTION "ORAMSCA_TEST151223". "" OM_CODE_COMBINATION_VISMA "PLSQL_OPTIMIZE_LEVEL = 2 PLSQL_CODE_TYPE = COMPILATION INTERPRETED PLSQL_DEBUG = FALSE PLSCOPE_SETTINGS = ' IDENTIFIERS: NO ' REUS

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/PROCEDURE/ALTER_PROCEDURE processing

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/PACKAGE/PACKAGE_BODY of treatment

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/JAVA_SOURCE/JAVA_SOURCE

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/JAVA_CLASS/JAVA_CLASS

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/CONSTRAINT/REF_CONSTRAINT of treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/STATISTICS/TABLE_STATISTICS treatment

  Work 'SYSTEM '. "" SYS_IMPORT_FULL_01 "finished with 3 errors at 01:01:58

  Thank you

  Jeremy.

  Seems that you do not import the file that you exported?

  Export: dumpfile = ORAMSCA_TEST1.dmp

  Import: dumpfile = expdp_ORAMSCA_151221.dmp

  AJ

• Copied table does not match the original

  Hello world
  
  I'm using Oracle 10 g XE. I have a table with 20078 lines. There are so many duplicate rows and I want to keep only one of. So I did a "separate query" with all the columns, but the ID (primary key). I got 11781 lines of this query, which makes sense. I created a copy of the blank from the original table by using the functionalilty of 10 g XE, because I didn't want to create the new table from scratch. I used this "separate query' to insert 11781 lines in the copied table.
  
  Because I need to keep track of the ID in the original table, I made a request to correspond to each ID of the table with the ID of the original table that had the same values of column (except the ID). I tried to create the 1-to-many relationship between the copy and the original paintings.
  
  I surprised when I did get no result (no data found) this query. I played with commenting some columns in the WHERE clause, but the results vary a lot depending on the column that I comment. This request must obtain an accurate result of 20078 lines (the size of the original table). How is that possible? I have found a bug? :-)
  
  Thanks in advance.
  
  
  SELECT 'EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS' ID_E_O 'EMPRESAS_REVISADAS' ID_E_R USER.USER USER.USER OF
  EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS, EMPRESAS_REVISADAS
  WHERE
  "EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS".ID_FUENTE = "EMPRESAS_REVISADAS".ID_FUENTE
  AND "EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS". COMPILADOR = "EMPRESAS_REVISADAS." COMPILADOR
  AND "EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS". SECTOR_BURSATIL = "EMPRESAS_REVISADAS". SECTOR_BURSATIL
  AND "EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS". PAGE = "EMPRESAS_REVISADAS." PAGINA
  AND "EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS". ADDRESS = "EMPRESAS_REVISADAS". DIRECCION
  AND "EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS". CP = "EMPRESAS_REVISADAS." CP
  AND "EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS". ANO_FUNDACION = "EMPRESAS_REVISADAS". ANO_FUNDACION
  AND "EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS". CAPITAL_NOMINAL = "EMPRESAS_REVISADAS". CAPITAL_NOMINAL
  AND "EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS". CAPITAL_DESEMBOLSADO = "EMPRESAS_REVISADAS". CAPITAL_DESEMBOLSADO
  AND "EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS". OBLIGACIONES = "EMPRESAS_REVISADAS." OBLIGACIONES
  AND "EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS". IMPORTE_CUENTAS_PENDIENTES = "EMPRESAS_REVISADAS". IMPORTE_CUENTAS_PENDIENTES
  AND "EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS". OBSERVACIONES = "EMPRESAS_REVISADAS." OBSERVACIONES
  AND "EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS". APALANCAMIENTO = "EMPRESAS_REVISADAS." APALANCAMIENTO
  AND "EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS". NUMBER = "EMPRESAS_REVISADAS". NUMBER
  AND "EMPRESAS_ORGANISMOS". NOMBRE_MUNICIPIO = "EMPRESAS_REVISADAS". NOMBRE_MUNICIPIO;

  Possibly, you have made a mistake when filling with the SEPARATE application (put data from column 2 in column 1 by mistake for example). Without seeing exactly what you did, it is rather difficult to say.

  For example a simple query, I would look to the error of the user before the Oracle bug error :)

• combine two daq physical channels in a single task

  Hi all!

  I use a PCI-6120 with a BNC-2120 to generate two signals: one is used to control an optical device which must be characterized, and the other signal is sent to a digital video camera to trigger the acquisition so that it is synchronized with the first signal. Everything is controlled with Labview.

  I want to give the possibility to the user to choose which channel to use for the first signal and channel to use for the second signal, depending on how the devices connected to the BNC-2120. So I would like to put two different "physical channel" screws on the Labview command window.

  My question is:

  What I need to create two different tasks to the signals to be generated on the appropriate channel, or can I combine two channels (and how?) think I handle only a single task to two channels always but do not forget that each signal is generated on the corerct channel, depending on the channel selected for each of the two signals...?

  Thanks a lot for your answers.

  Nice day.

  Luke

  Hi LucG,

  If you use only a single Council to create only a single task for two generations.

  You can choose several channels by clicking on "Restaurants" in the channel control physical choice multiple channels thanks ctr + click, or by concatenating multiple channels with a comma as on arrival at the VI.

  Then, when you provide data to the VI of writing, the data should be organized in a table, each channel is on a line and the order of the channels is the same as in the control of the physical channels.

  I hope this can help!

  Thank you

• Why do write can not be performed because the number of data channels does not match number of channels in the task.

  Possible reasons:

  Scripture cannot be performed because the number of data channels does not match number of channels in the task.

  When writing, provide data for all channels in the task. You can also change the task so that it contains the same number of channels as the written data.

  Number of job channels: 8
  Number of data channels: 1

  Lama says:

  The DAQmx vi writing gives me the error. If I run a single channel, isn't a problem. Multichannel gives me error.

  You are funny! Why tie yourself to work VI (single channel) instead of one that gives you errors (multichannel)?

  (If your car does not work, you bring car your wives to the mechanic, right!)

  What is the exact text in the multichannel 'physical channels' when you do the AO control?

  Lama says:

  I did a sequence to ensure that each function has been run in the correct order. Wouldn't a race condition.

  All you have to do is wire the 'start of task' error at the entrance of error of the DAQ assistant and then back to 'stop task' and things will run in order. Guaranteed! Think the stream! Everything else can run in parallel or the order is irrelevant.

  First convert the sequence stacked to a sequence of plate, remove the flat sequence and add the mentioned son. Now, do a "cleaning pattern.

  A when stacked with the inhabitants of the sequence is one of the worst construction you can possibly do. It makes the code difficult to follow, impossible to maintain, difficult to debug.

• Dedicated for each channel from multiple channels in a single task task disadvantage

  Hello

  My current acquisition software (C + c++ / GCC) encapsulates the methods rather clumsy niDAQmx C to interface with the data acquisition equipment in a class that represents a task of acquisition. This way I can create several instances, for example counter input, analog input, analog output, their terminals and the class supports all work low level as ensuring input analog fake internal is started if there are only counter entries such as the sample clock starts, or configure reminders N-sample, etc.

  It seems to work very well, and also the time seems to be good, because first of all the tasks on multiple instances of my wrapper. For triggered early, that I use

  DAQmxCfgDigEdgeStartTrig(mTask,mTriggerTerminal.toAscii().constData(),DAQmx_Val_Rising)

  in-house.

  Now my real question: what is the advantage of multiple channels, when everything seems to work fine with multiple tasks and only one channel per task? I don't see the disadvantage, it would first classify necessary acquisitions in types (I, ao,...) because several strings in a single task must be of the same type. With my approach I need not care because each channel still gets its own task.

  I don't know I'm missing something here. Maybe someone can explain it to me, maybe some limitation of multi-tasking, I have not yet read.

  Hey!

  Unless you specified for managing the it (simultaneous sampling) or modular instruments and hardware devices (see link )

  You cannot perform two tasks at the same time that access to the analog inputs, for example, because the

  ADC is a shared resource that is connected to a multiplexer, and that only one task can work in it at a time given. (see here )

  Similar restrictions often apply to other types of operations.

  I'm not aware of any performance issues, perhaps a little more memory could be used.

  So as long as your hardware supports what you are doing, you should be ok, I think,

  and it is only a question of clarity and intelligibility, ease of use and structure.

  As you use classes, I'm sure you've heard about encapsulation - so it is a

  question of how you want to design your application.

  In addition, when you work in LabVIEW, tasks feel more natural to the principle of data flow, because you have a thread for your data acquisition,

  and it works very well with our modes of standard design.

  So, if it is better for you (and works with the hardware), you can give all the channels its own task.

  Hopefully this might clarify some things,

  Kind regards

  Rome

  OR Germany

• The easiest way to add several single-task in a new task of multiple channels

  Hi all users of LV!

  I've created several single tasks in MAX. To simplify things, we will assume that they are all of the same type (analog current - voltage). In addition, each task is characterized by specific properties such as the custom scale, the final value of configuration, max, and min, etc..

  I ask you to show me (if it exists) a simple way to add programmatically (merge) all of these channels in a multichannel new task, now clearly all the specific properties that I mentioned earlier. For 'simple', I mean fast, which is not need too much coding and reduce as much as possible the use of knots of property for these specific properties (see photo).

  Thank you in advance!

  Marco

  aRCo wrote:

  Infact, in this case, my colleague tasks needs to make acquisitions directly in MAX in order to validate the hardware and with virtual tracks overall is not possible, see that a global virtual channel does not have the ability to set the frequency of acquisition and other functions. Furthermore, I can't change all of a sudden the situation and the way that someone else works.

  Then he makes a task using the global chain.  Then you can reuse the channels!

  But it could work for you by creating global channels that you currently have.

  

• How to configure multi analog channels inputs in a single task

  Hello I want to acquire two signals of the two channels (input 1 analog acceleration; analog input voltage 2) without using wizard DAQmx because I have to use standard vi I use usb NI 9234 any suggestion please I tried with a chanel and I got good result but when I try two delivery channels I errors please hep me

  Hi Broutchoux,

  What are the errors you get when you run your code? This is a mistake-50103?  As long as your acceleration and your task of voltage use the same synchronization settings, you can combine the two channels in a single task.  This should fix the error you receive.  The article below has a picture that shows the configuration I describe:

  With the help of different Types of Global DAQmx channels in the same task
  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/3296BA2AEF586B7386256D6D00528E3D?OpenDocument

• PXI-13 6133 in a single task OR DAQmx?

  Is it recommended to use the PXI-13 6133 in a PXI-1044 + PXI-8106 in a single task?

  Installation program:

  PF0 trigger every 40ms

  Sample PF8 103kHz clock

  samples of 1020 per channel

  Hello Jainsch,

  just a little addition:

  Please set the speed of the fan in the back to 'HIGH' and insert a Slot-blocker in all empty slots to improve airflow (cooling).

  http://sine.NI.com/NIPs/CDs/view/p/lang/de/NID/206303

  Kind regards

  N. Ralf

• External device problem - "YOU NEED of PERMISSION to PERFORM THIS ADMINISTRATIVE TASK" & after I click 'YES' it says "DESTINATION FOLDER ACCESS IS DENIED."

  Original title: external device problem

  Whenever I connect any external devices like pen drive & sdcard, I can't write anything in them, that they are not protected in writing! But I can copy things from them, but I can not cut & paste anything on their part in my system. I can only copy & paste. Whenever I try to write anything he says 'YOU NEED of PERMISSION to PERFORM THIS ADMINISTRATIVE TASK' & after I click 'YES' it says "DESTINATION FOLDER ACCESS IS DENIED." When I tried to format these devices, he says "YOU do not HAVE ENOUGH PERMISSION to PERFORM THIS OPERATION".

  Please help me!

  Sriram salvation,

  Have you tried the suggestions in the previous answer?

  I suggest you to disable the antivirus application and check the status of the issue. Refer to the following steps:

  a: you should see an icon for your Antivirus program in the taskbar notification area. It is usually at the bottom right of your desktop.

  b. click the third-party security software, you will see a pop up.

  (c) in this pop and select the option to disable, click on it.

  d. now third-party security software will be disabled.

  Note: Antivirus software can help protect your computer against viruses and other security threats. In most cases, you should not disable your antivirus software. If you need to disable temporarily to install other software, you must reactivate as soon as you are finished. If you are connected to the Internet or a network, while your antivirus software is disabled, your computer is vulnerable to attacks.

  Please let us know if you need assistance.

• At the start of XP, get tasks to the message request did not

  When Windows starts, it keeps popping up:

  «Some tasks has not run at their regular times [...]»

  He even suggests that I have 'attempt' to run. Yes, good. Why is not that?

  How to get rid of this annoying pop up?

  I can't seem to understand or to understand why Support engineers who are hired by Microsoft can adequately respond to so many questions XP and respond with stupid things instead.

  If you mean that you see a message like this:

  Task Scheduler service
  Some tasks did not perform at their regular time because the Task Scheduler Service was not running.  You can view a list of missed tasks and try to run again to go with in the folder scheduled tasks.

  If you look in the scheduled task log file, you will see something like this:

  "Task Scheduler service".
  Some tasks may not have performed at their regular times between 17/02/2012 12:10:01 and 17/02/2012 12:23, either because the Task Scheduler Service is not running, the computer was hibernating.
     
  In the menu start then run, and in the type box:

  c:\Windows\Tasks

  Click OK to open the folder scheduled tasks, then drag the column autour separators so you can see the column headings.

  Look at the regulars and the columns of the next time run to see what tasks are to plan and NOT disabled or not scheduled run.

  Any scheduled task to want to run at the set time, as long as the system is running during this time.

  Some products that you install will set up a task so that they can update themselves at some point (as 02:00).  If your system does not work at 02:00 the next time that you start your system and if the skipped "Notify me of tasks" option is checked, you will see this message.  Things work as expected, which is not always as desired.

  You can also click with the right button on any task, choose Properties and disable the task or disable the option "Warn me of tasks" jumped (or both).

  You don't want to just disable the Task Scheduler Service because this Service is required for other things apart from the scheduled tasks.

  If you are not sure that the tasks are to meet with the name of the task and we can help you understand whether you need it or not.

  If you want to get a new start on the scheduled task log file:

  Stop the Task Scheduler service. Click on start, settings, Control Panel, administrative tools, Services and locate the Task Scheduler Service and stop it.

  Remove or rename the scheduled task probably cluttered log file that is usually found here:

  c:\windows\SchedLgU.txt

  Restart the Task Scheduler Service to create a new journal (it's just a text file) and verify that a new log file has been created and the content looks like this:

  "Task Scheduler service".
  Started on 01/01/2011 06:26:43
  [* The most recent entry is above this line *]

• LOV inside the inner table does not!

  Hello
  
  I have a Master Advanced Table and an internal Table (more advanced) retail. (I know it's a performance problem, but..)  :()
  
  I have a number of customer LOV in internal table. But when I select a row in the LOV I don't get the value returned to my return of goods. Page popup LOV just stay there without responding to any request post.
  
  I'm on 11.5.10 RUP4.
  
  Thank you
  Wine

  In my view, that this feature is not supported as indicated in the dev guide:

  "The inner table does not support LOVs. You must use a different user interface.

• Warning of coherence - [39008] Table size not attached to Source fact

  I have a scheme in which I have the following tables:
  (A) fact Table patient Transaction (e.g., supplies used, procedures performed, etc..)
  (B) demographic Dimension table (houses info like patient location code)
  (C) location Dimension table (tells me what each location unique maps to the hospital)
  
  Is this table A and table B is a dimension table is attached to A table based on the ID of the Patient, so I can get general information about the patient. This would allow me to apply logic to see just patients transactions where the patient was FEMALE, or has been in the emergency room, by applying conditions to these fields in table B.
  
  Table C is a lookup table simple accompanied in table B of the Code of location, so I can identify the hospital emergency room where the patient was in for example.
  
  So the pattern is: has <-b <-C, where B and C are the two dimension tables.
  
  The query works the way you want, but my consistency check gives me the following WARNING:
  
  * [39008] logical dimension table D LOCATION MASTER has a source D LOCATION MASTER does not join any source.*
  
  How to fix this WARNING, or at least remove?

  Hello

  What you need to do is to add the dimension table to store (physical) to the source of the logic of the demographic dimension table, for example by dragging of the layer on top of picture logic source of demographic of MDB layer logical dimension table

  Kind regards
  Stijn

• Strange behavior with Report Generation Toolkit. Table does not table.

  We use a Word 2003 (.doc) document as a template for a summary of the report.  It works fine on the development PC.  It fills the fields in the document and fills the chart correctly, as shown in the picture below.

  

  However, he cannot even on another station.  Although the 2D table is identical and so is the software to investigate the matter, the table does not get filled correctly.  I studied using Word 2010 (.docx) as a model, with the same results.

  I was not able to understand what is different between stations 2 and why it does not work on the 2nd station.  I googled similar questions on the Web site of NOR and was only this article in the knowledge base concerning the new lines in the cell, which is not my case.

  That's what I have on the 2nd machine:

  

  The table that is sent to the table contains the appropriate data :

  

  I just found out this is a known bug, which obviously has not yet been resolved (finally... at least until LV2012SP1).

  See these threads:

  http://forums.NI.com/T5/LabVIEW/problem-with-append-table-and-Word-2010/TD-p/1268246

  and

  http://forums.NI.com/T5/LabVIEW/report-generation-MS-Word-table-bug/m-p/1605170

  I'll try the workarounds suggested and report back...