Pix 525 hardware problem?

Similar Questions

• Problems with VPN PIX 525 Lan-to-Lan Cisco 2610XM

  Hello world

  I have a VPN with PIX 525 versi problems? n 7.2 (1) and Cisco 2610XM Version 12.3 (18). When start the PIX, all tunnels works well, but 6-7 days, some of the tunnels do not work properly. Traffic passes the tunnel with some networks, but not with all networks. Sometimes the tunnel descends and it is imposible to go upward.

  Attach them files are the "debug crypto isakmp" in both devices.

  Thank you and sorry for my bad English

  If your configuration of the tunnel on router 7500 series, the tunnel interface are not supported for politicians to service in the tunnel interfaces on 7500

• Cannot Ping PIX 525 inside interface

  Hi, I can not ping the interface e1 of a new 525 PIX running V6.35. I configured the address e1 and tried, but I can't ping the laptop connected directly to it, or vice versa... ACL has added to what icmp any an and the IP a whole and applied the e1 interface. Still can not ping... any idea why this is happening?... I'm suspect a hardware problem or cable, the cable must be crossver or directly through... I tired to connect to a switch also but same result... interface e1 is towards the top and to the top and show no problem... nor log shows no info as to why this happens... any suggestion is appreciated.

  Thank you

  GT

  Hello

  A single pix failover license does not work like a normal pix, so you can not 'test' with her before connecting. Once that connect you to your primary pix, that it will automatically update the IOS on the unit of failover and reproduce the config, so none of this is required of you before hand. I found this process much easier by using serial failover cable first, once the installation is finished and then in my case, I use the failover LAN based that later, I migrated to. Here's a couple of useful documents that you can review. Your version of the software may require the updated documentation.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/customer/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a0080094ea7.shtml

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/iaabu/PIX/pix_sw/v_63/config/failover.htm#1076500

• VPN site to site Pix 525 ver7.2 (2) and Pix 501 ver 6.3

  Hello!!

  I have problems to establish a vpn between two pix.

  The first pix 525 a version 7.2 (2) an another Pix version 6.3 has this it is not run by myself.

  The fixed phase 1 but send the associated messages

  can help me

  Thank you

  I'm glad you got it working now :)

  Please evaluate the useful messages.

  Concerning

  Farrukh

• Card crypto controls lock-up PIX 525

  Does anyone know why my PIX 525 crashes when I apply my a cryptomap both command line? I first apply the following ACL. But when I try to apply the first line of cryptomap my PIX locks and I have to restart... Any help would be greatly appreciated >

  permit access ip xx.xx.0.0 255.192.0.0 list XXXXXtunnel xx.xx.18.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list allowed sheep xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.xx.0 255.255.255.0 xx.xx.0.0 ip

  allowed to access-list acl-inner ip xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.0.0 xx.xx.xx.0 xx.xx.xx.0

  xxx_map 157 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  card crypto xxx_map 157 correspondence address xxx-tunnel

  card crypto xxx_map 157 counterpart set xx.4.xx.xx

  card crypto xxx_map 157 transform-set xxx_set

  Hello

  I came across this problem when there are other entries already exist under the same crypto map, and are already applied to an interface.

  I found that by denying first crypto map interface command, change the config and re - apply the interface command then it will work very well.

  So...

  (1) no xxx_map interface card crypto outside

  (2) place the lines of crypto map configuration

  (3) interface xxx_map crypto map out

  Of course, you will lose the existing tunnels if some already set up but then this happens if you reboot anyway!

  It may be useful

• PIX 525 with OSPF

  Anyone used PIX 525 with routing OSPF? How it works, which means is it reliable? All the problems?

  SP

  Thank you

  This feature is now reliable enough. We had met bug initially, but they have been constantly improved.

  Thank you

  Nadeem

• PIX 525 level v6.0 to v6.2 (1) or v6.2 (2)?

  I've upgraded the code on all our PIX.

  I was moving to code 6.2 for adding features and the ability to update of PDM to support the consolidation and VPN.

  Most firewalls are 515 s but I have a pair of 525 s 6.0 running (1).

  Open caveats for 6.2 (2) are... CSCdx89579 PIX 525 crashes intermittently.

  The release notes for the 6.2 (1) the earlier version is not a caveat to 525 breaks down.

  My question:

  That caveat introduced in 6.2 (2) or simply not found in 6.2 (1)? If it was introduced in 6.2 (2) at least I can set it to 6.2 (1) for this pair. No one knows how many times and in what circumstances this happens?

  Thank you

  Scot

  This bug is seen only in a failover pair, and even in this case only when say a person is a "write pending" on a PIX and someone else makes a "write mem" on the other. Basically when two orders are executed at the same time, it * may * happen. Very rare, given that a single customer by the look of it.

  This bug is also in point 6.1, in fact it has been discovered in this code, which is why it appears in the notes of 6.2 version. In fact, he is also fixed in 6.0 code, which means that the bug was, it's just that no one has been to her then.

  It was fixed and integrated in some draft versions of the code, no versions of release. You can open a TAC case if you wish and ask for one of these versions (they will be able to look to the high no problem as long as you give them the ID of the bug). Of course then you will run draft code, it's up to you if you want to do it or not.

• Allowing ICMP and Telnet via a PIX 525

  We are trying to build a new block of distribution to our backbone WAN. We are experiencing a problem when establishing ICMP and Telnet via the PIX. The following is known:

  1 Ping and telnet to the 6509 and internal network works very well for the PIX.

  2 Ping the 7206 for the PIX works just fine.

  3 debug normal to see activity track ICMP for connections ICMP for the PIX of the network 6509 and internal; However, the debug shows nothing - no activity - during attempts to ping at a.b.5.18. (see below).

  In short, all connections seem to be fine between the three devices, however, we can get ICMP and Telnet work correctly through the PIX.

  The layout is:

  6509 (MSFC) - PIX 525-7206

  IP:a.b.5.1 - a.b.5.2 a.b.5.17 - a.b.5.18

  255.255.255.0 255.255.255.240 255.255.255.240

  (both)

  networks: a.b.5.0 a.b.5.16

  255.255.255.240 255.255.255.240

  6509:

  interface VlanX

  Description newwan-bb

  IP address a.b.5.1 255.255.255.0

  no ip redirection

  router ospf

  Log-adjacency-changes

  redistribute static subnets metric 50 metric-type 1

  passive-interface default

  no passive-interface Vlan9

  ((other networks omitted))

  network a.b.5.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

  default information are created

  PIX 525:

  ethernet0 nameif outside security0

  nameif ethernet1 inside the security100

  nameif ethernet2 security10 failover

  hostname XXXXXX

  domain XXX.com

  fixup protocol ftp 21

  fixup protocol http 80

  fixup protocol h323 1720

  fixup protocol rsh 514

  fixup protocol rtsp 554

  fixup protocol smtp 25

  fixup protocol sqlnet 1521

  fixup protocol sip 5060

  fixup protocol 2000 skinny

  names of

  access ip-list 102 permit a whole

  access-list 102 permit icmp any one

  access-list 102 permit icmp any any echo

  access-list 102 permit icmp any any echo response

  access-list 102 permit icmp any any source-quench

  access-list 102 permit everything all unreachable icmp

  access-list 102 permit icmp any one time exceed

  103 ip access list allow a whole

  access-list 103 allow icmp a whole

  access-list 103 permit icmp any any echo

  access-list 103 permit icmp any any echo response

  access-list 103 permit icmp any any source-quench

  access-list 103 allow all unreachable icmp

  access-list 103 allow icmp all once exceed

  pager lines 24

  opening of session

  timestamp of the record

  logging buffered stored notifications

  interface ethernet0 100full

  interface ethernet1 100full

  interface ethernet2 100full

  Outside 1500 MTU

  Within 1500 MTU

  failover of MTU 1500

  IP address outside a.b.5.17 255.255.255.240

  IP address inside a.b.5.2 255.255.255.240

  failover from IP 192.168.230.1 255.255.255.252

  alarm action IP verification of information

  alarm action attack IP audit

  history of PDM activate

  ARP timeout 14400

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  Access-group 103 in external interface

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 a.b.5.18 1

  Route inside a.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 a.b.5.1 1

  Inside a.b.0.0 255.240.0.0 route a.b.5.1 1

  Timeout xlate 03:00

  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0: 10:00 udp 0:02:00 CPP 0: h323 from 10:00 0:05:00 sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00

  Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute

  GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server

  RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server

  No snmp server location

  No snmp Server contact

  SNMP-Server Community public

  No trap to activate snmp Server

  enable floodguard

  No sysopt route dnat

  Telnet a.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 outdoors

  Telnet a.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 inside

  Telnet a.b.0.0 255.240.0.0 inside

  Telnet a.b.5.18 255.255.255.255 inside

  Telnet timeout 5

  SSH timeout 5

  Terminal width 80

  Recognizing any help on proper routing through a PIX 525, given that all this is for a network internal.

  on the 6509, why the int has a 24 subnet mask, when everything has a 28? If you try the 6500 ping.18, he thinks that it is on a local network, and there no need to route through the pix

  Your access lists are confusing.

  access-list # ip allowed any one should let through, and so everything that follows are redundant statements.

  for the test,.

  alloweverything ip access list allow a whole

  Access-group alloweverything in interface outside

  should the pix act as a router - you are effectively disabling all firewall features.

• Juniper Netscreen SSG20 is directly connected to the Cisco PIX 525.

  Hi all, I have a third-party provider to put a Juniper SSG20 VPN device in our network. I want to connect directly to a PIX 525. Someone at - he tried the same thing? Any question, should I be careful?

  I have attached a diagram of the proposed provision.

  Thank you.

  Dmitry

  Should not be a problem as long as you know what protocol and ports Juniper use so you can open it on the PIX 525 ACL.

• PIX 525 config and VPN configuration

  Hello

  I was asked to work on a customer request to replave sound no cisco FW with a pix 525 and also lead to a VPN solution using this PIX 525.

  I'm not a FW as my main experience is with Routing/Switching, but I have read some documentation and had some hands on a client of vpn300 501 PIX and cisco.  I managed to make it appear the vpn connection, even if all tests have failed (you need to solve any further).

  Customer has its main site with an application that runs on a Web server that must be accessed only through the vpn to: 3rd party + a few remote users.

  The solution, I want to propose to the client is:

  option 1:

  PIX 525 as a vpn server + Cisco vpn 3000 client on all PCs of remote users.

  option 2:

  PIX 525 as a vpn server + vpn client windows on all PCs of remote users

  option 3:

  PIX 525 as vpn + PIX 501 to 3 rd party server + vpn client windows on all PCs of remote users

  First I want to confirm that these motions are feasible.  So which option should I go for knowing that the remote users are only about 10.

  Client doesn't no Ganymede or RADIUS should go for statis userid/pass set up on PIX525?

  Any idea, advice, suggestion is welcome.  Thanks in advance

  Kind regards

  ngtelecom

  Hello

  Option 1

  In my opinion, is the best solution because the PIX 525 will act as a firewall and the VPN server.

  Then, all the clients connect via VPN using Cisco's VPN IPsec client software.

  Option 2

  The advantage of this option is that you do not need to install VPN software on clients (not a problem, only 10 clients)

  The problem is that it does not come with split tunneling and don't provide as good protection as Cisco software.

  Option 3

  This is also valid, and you can do an EasyVPN connection where the 525 is the server and the 501 to the customer.

  Local authentication on the PIX 525 sounds great.

  As a recommendation, the PIX are EoS and the replacement are the ASAs.

  It will be useful.

  Federico.

• Diagnostic tool hardware problems on Satellite has detected memory

  Diagnostic tool memory detected in my laptop hardware problems. Now I don't know what part of the hardware's fault.

  Whenever I start my laptop after shoutting it down for some time, it appears failed early and repair takes place and start using the system restore that will come back at some point.

  Is that what this has to do anything with overheating?
  Please help me immediately

  > Diagnostic memory tool detected hardware problems in my laptop. Now I don't know what part of the hardware's fault.

  I would assume memory one or two failures of modules.
  I recommend you to check them both.

  Remove a module and try to use the laptop with a connected module.
  Then another module test. Make it as different memory locations.

  If two modules are corrupt, then you will need to replace both.

• Wireless - hardware problem?

  Hello world

  I have a laptop HP V3018CL. I have a wireless issue. I can not connect what either. But here's the weird part, I can't find my int Device Manager listed wireless card. I can't find in the Network Neighborhood properties. And the WiFi (in front of the laptop is sold red / (Orange)?) I'm not good with colors) (it was blue)

  I tried to re-install the drivers but without success. Can someone help me with this? What it means if the led is orange/red solid. And why can't find my device in the Device Manager? Thank you

  Sam.

  Message edited by SamNeddy on 02/11/2009 13:17

  Yesterday, I was chatting with HP support.
  
  It was the most frustrating conversation of my life. I told them exactly what I had done, the syptoms, everything and then the guy goes, we go just to install drivers. Even if I told them, it's a hardware problem, the orange light, the device, the update of the firmware Manager. All this fell on deaf years. It seemed that the guy knew nothing of the software support and read just via a script. arrrrggghhhhhhh! IT IS THE LAST TIME THAT I WILL EVEN INVEST IN A CV!
  
  so I just buy an adapter wifi for 30 dollars and call it a day!

• Satellite A200 reporting screens not correctable hardware problem blue

  My model Satellite A200 PSAFCA-01H00J is blue screening and reporting of a non correctable hardware problem. I disconnected all devices, including the mouse.

  All tests of memory and the device driver may report any problems. I unplugged and reinsert the two memory chips.

  There has been no hardware or changes to software other than Windows to auto update.

  This machine runs on Vista SP1. I dug the following message: Root cause found Bugcheck 124 unknown parameters 0x0, 0x95f7c3f0, 0xb2000040, 0 x 800. MSDN Info for this can be found at
  http://msdn.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/Windows/hardware/ff557321.

  Anyone know where I should look for this hardware problem?

  If you remove the second module of RAM is still blue screen?

  I saw 0 x 00000124 on a similar laptop and it was a problem of CPU.

• MBPr 2013 - is this visual glitch a hardware problem?

  

  Is attached a screenshot of my App Store as it is currently. This kind of effect 'glitch' also sometimes appears on my desktop. Add to that, twice in the last two days, my computer crashed randomly when using Chrome.

  The only known issue with my laptop is currently a low capacity battery - nothing serious, but it is less than 80% of the capacity of origin so OS X recommends a maintenance.

  Could this glitching and crashing (crashing has only just begun) be an indication of a more serious hardware problem?

  Thank you.

  You need a new battery in... work for the Genius Bar in the units of the retina.  Since the display problem can be demonstrated, they can look there as well.

• Analog multichannel peculiar read problem with PCI-6014 - hardware problem

  Hi all

  I see some very special behaviors with a 6014 when I do a multi-channel analog playback.  I am revamping of existing code to a customer, which implies the passing of the traditional DAQ in the DAQmx.  Traditional DAQ does not use a system based on the tasks, my client was in the process of reading clocked by the software for only one channel at a time, depending on what signal was of interest to both.  (application is a series of tests on a control PCB who will interface with some hardware, checking the answers and tensions and others)

  When I rewrote the application using DAQmx, I created a single task that contains all of the analog inputs of the map (AI0:15).  When I am interested in a particular signal, I indexed the channel since the reading chart data.  The strings that contain the actual data are 0, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 13, 14 and 15.  All channels are NRSE.

  One of the signals of interest lights AI7.

  When I connect the AI7 signal with an oscilloscope, I read 2.5V - which is exactly what I expect to see.

  When I read AI7 using MAX, I read 2.5V.

  When I read AI7 by itself using a single channel DAQmx reading (i.e. 1 Samp 1Chan or 1Chan N Samp), I read 2.5V.

  When I read AI7 simultaneously with all the channels that have a greater number of channel (i.e. AI8-15), I read 2.5V.

  When I read AI7 simultaneously with any channel that carries a lower channel number (i.e. AI0-6), I read 2.34V.

  ?????

  For example, if I read AI0:15, I read 2.34V on AI7.  If I read AI0:7, I read 2.34V.  If I read AI7:15, I read 2.5V.  If I read AI7:10, I read 2.5V.  If I read AI6:7, I read 2.34V.  And so on.  Any combination of playback channel which includes results AI0 AI1, AI2, AI3, AI4, AI5 or AI6 during a misreading on AI7.

  All channels read because they are supposed to, no matter what channel is included in the job.  AI7 is the only one that illustrates this behavior.

  I wrote code for the acquisition of data for 10 years now and I have never seen anything like this before. The behavior is consistent.  I am sure that it is a hardware problem with the Special Commission that I use.  That's the advice of my customer, I don't know when they bought it, but I think they have had for years.  I doubt that ever, it has been calibrated.

  I guess it's more I'm curious than anything else - what on earth would cause this behavior?

  I'll tell my client to replace the card, if really I just asked my own knowledge.