PIX of Pix VPN with no LAN
Same old story, but I have been able to resolve. We have recently resumed with 501 to 506 VPN client, but can not access the network from one side to the other resources. (Ping, browse, telnet...). The two attached configs. Thanks in advance.
You have BA/Decr on both sides, are you sure that the TWO parties can not access the other?
Concerning
Farrukh
Tags: Cisco Security
Similar Questions
-
With PAT on Cisco PIX VPN client
Dear all,
I have a PIX 515 to the main site with the IPSec security is enabled. Homepage user using 3.x VPN client connects to the PIX for VPN access. When user Home use real IP, I can ping to the local network of the main site. However, when the Home user using a router with PAT, the VPN can be established.
Is there a setting I should put on PIX, VPN client or router?
Thank you.
Doug
And if you still have problems, upgrade your pix, 6.3 and usage:
ISAKMP nat-traversal
But the first thing would be to check the IPSEC passthrough as Ade suggested. If the device is a linksys check the version of the firmware as well.
Kind regards
-
VPN with usernames in the pix firewall
Is there anyway to make my VPN connections in my specific user pix?
I know it's possible with the concentrator 3000 but don't know if you can do it with a pix. I have about 10 people who need VPN in.
Can each VPN cause a different password?
Reason is: if I let go 1 person I don't want to have to worry about changing the passwords for all the world just deleting an account.
Thank you
Anthony
In a PIX VPN connection should always be authenticated with a name of username/password extra for extra security. Up to v6.3 you used to have to store these names of user and password to an external Radius/GANYMEDE server, but to the point 6.3 now you can use the local user on the PIX database to store these.
The commands are:
> the client authentication card crypto LOCAL
> user_name password
You can have as many orders "... user name. "as you wish. If someone leaves your company simply remove it the name of the list.
-
Replication failover PIX VPN (CEP) certificate
Hello
Had a pair of PIX 525 on 6.3 (4) version running in active/failover mode, I recently configured VPN authenticated by certificates, which involved the use of PRACTICE in order to get the certificate to the PIX. Certificates have been imported for the PIX from a snap-in with the software component CEP Protocol Windows CA server by following the instructions described here: http://www.ciscosystems.com/en/US/docs/security/pix/pix63/configuration/guide/sit2site.html#wp1007263 .
It all works very well, the configuration has been saved, certificates registered cases using "ca save all", everything works well except the certificates that have been imported have not been replicated for the PIX failover - the command 'Show the ca certificate', shows not all certs.
Private keys show 'sh ca mypubkey rsa' are the same on both devices.
I'm not able to find any documentation about how certificates must be replicated on the PIX failover, and it is not possible to write certificates again on the PIX failover using the commands they were initially imported by:
PIX - fw # conf t
WARNING *.
Configuration of replication is NOT performed the unit from standby to Active unit.
Configurations are no longer synchronized.PIX - FW (config) auth ca ca
WARNING *.
Configuration of replication is NOT performed the unit from standby to Active unit.
Configurations are no longer synchronized.Everyone knows a similar issue or how to get the PIX failover with the new ca certificates?
Kind regards
Sarunas
Hello Sarunas
PIX 6 indeed do not synchronize keys and certificates automatically.
However, you should be able to do this first, forcing a failover (i.e. secondary image make it active), then register (now active) high school with the certification authority.
HTH
Herbert
-
I'm trying to implement a simple PIX PIX VPN using the simple PIX - PIX VPN documentation for the sample config page. I have a lot of VPN tunnels with other very happy other PIX devices so it's quite annoying. Anyway, on the source PIX config is as follows:-
access-list 101 permit ip 172.18.138.0 255.255.255.0 172.18.133.0 255.255.255.0
access-list 101 permit ip 172.18.133.0 255.255.255.0 172.18.138.0 255.255.255.0
NAT (phoenix_private) 0-access list 101
Permitted connection ipsec sysopt
No sysopt route dnat
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac chevelle
ntlink 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map TransAm
correspondence address 1 card crypto transam 101
card crypto transam 1 set peer 172.18.126.233
card crypto transam 1 transform-set chevelle
interface inside crypto map transam
ISAKMP allows inside
ISAKMP key * address 172.18.126.233 netmask 255.255.255.255
ISAKMP identity address
part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 1
of ISAKMP policy 1 encryption
ISAKMP policy 1 md5 hash
1 1 ISAKMP policy group
ISAKMP policy 1 lifetime 1000
and if I generate the traffic logs show this: -.
9 August 18:40:15 10.60.6.247% PIX-3-305005: no translation not found for icmp src phoenix_private:172.18.138.111 dst domestic group: 172.18.133.51 (type 8, code 0)
9 August 18:40:17 10.60.6.247% PIX-3-305005: no translation not found for icmp src phoenix_private:172.18.138.111 dst domestic group: 172.18.133.51 (type 8, code 0)
9 August 18:40:18 10.60.6.247% PIX-3-305005: no group of translation not found for udp src phoenix_private:172.18.138.111/3832 dst inside:172.18.133.51/53
9 August 18:40:18 10.60.6.247% PIX-3-305005: no translation not found for icmp src phoenix_private:172.18.138.111 dst domestic group: 172.18.133.51 (type 8, code 0)
9 August 18:40:19 10.60.6.247% PIX-3-305005: no group of translation not found for udp src phoenix_private:172.18.138.111/3832 dst inside:172.18.133.51/53
No isakmp and ipsec debugging message appears, but you who wait that the PIX does not even link the traffic with the access list or a NAT.
I do something obviously stupid, can someone tell me what it is, thank you.
Jon.
Hello
1. you create a second access as list:
outside_cryptomap ip 172.18.138.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 172.18.133.0 255.255.255.0
and
2. instead of
correspondence address 1 card crypto transam 101
You must configure
card crypto transam 1 match address outside_cryptomap
the problem is that you configure an ACL for nat and crypto - that does not work
concerning
Alex
-
I want to activate an incoming and outgoing VPN on a PIX configured with PAT. I enabled ESP and UDP/500 on the appropriate access to the lists, but must provide a static for inbound traffic. I already use a static for incoming SMTP traffic, and I don't see how to do the same thing for udp/500, but how do I ESP traffic?
Any suggestions gratefully received.
If you are referring to a static port, you can create one for ESP since static port can only be created for TCP/UDP and ESP is located just above the intellectual property, it is NOT a TCP/UDP protocol. You will need to create a one-to-one static for this internal VPN server and have your clients to connect to this address. This will chew global IP address to another one, sorry.
-
Configuration of the PIX 520 with two links to Internet
Hello.
I have a pix 520 with four interfaces ethernet firewall, in fact I am with
just two interfaces,
Ethernet 0 outdoors
Ethernet 1 inside
ethernet2 closed intf2
ethernet3 closed intf3
Thus, in the interface to the outside, I have access to the internet, but now I
access to the internet and I want to configure the two, I mean,.
a single network inside and two internet access,
is it posible?
the perhaps configuration.
Ethernet 0 (access 1) outdoors
1 Ethernet (ip 10.1.1.1) inside
ethernet2 outside2 (access to internet 2)
ethernet3 inside2? (ip 10.1.1.2)?
Thanks for the help,
You can plug it in like that, but there is no way to route traffic by default. PIX does not support this type of connections that you can only configure a default route on the pix. This link should help describe what you can do: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/110/pixfaq.shtml#Q18
I hope this helps.
Kurtis Durrett
-
Anyone used PIX 525 with routing OSPF? How it works, which means is it reliable? All the problems?
SP
Thank you
This feature is now reliable enough. We had met bug initially, but they have been constantly improved.
Thank you
Nadeem
-
On Pix VPN tunnel to the same subnet
I have a customer who want to set up a the PIX VPN tunnel located on each site. For some reason, each side has the same subnet number, for example. 10.10.10.x/32. I'm sure we must run NAT, but is it possible.
This can help
http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800949f1.shtml
-
We use a PIX 515 as the hub of a LAN to LAN VPN as well as to access VPN Clinet. Using a multipoint configuration sites speaks (all PIX 501) are able to communicate with each other. However, the VPN to access the 515 client are not able to access the VPN sites has talked about. I think that it is due to the fact that put an end to all tunnels on the same interface of the PIX 515. Is there a way to allow the VPN CLient to communicate with the LAN VPN spoke?
Concerning
PD
Currently, it is not a good way to meet the requirements above. However, add us a new item (or rather, a restriction of relax) for the PIX 7.0 code (to be released in December/January) to allow clients VPN packets 'u-turn' on a Hub PIX to PIX spoke connected via Lan-to-Lan tunnels. The program 7.0 beta is about to begin (may have just begun) so if interested, please contact your local account engineer Cisco. Sorry for the news but help is on the way.
Scott
-
Remote access VPN with ASA 5510 by using the DHCP server
Hello
Can someone please share your knowledge to help me find out why I'm not able to receive an IP address on the remote access VPN connection so that I can get an IP local pool DHCP?
I'm trying to set up remote access VPN with ASA 5510. It works with dhcp local pool but does not seem to work when I tried to use an existing DHCP server. It is tested in an internal network as follows:
!
ASA Version 8.2 (5)
!
interface Ethernet0/1
nameif inside
security-level 100
IP 10.6.0.12 255.255.254.0
!
IP local pool testpool 10.6.240.150 - 10.6.240.159 a mask of 255.255.248.0. (worked with it)
!
Route inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.6.0.1 1
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac FirstSet
life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
Crypto-map dynamic dyn1 1jeu transform-set FirstSet
dynamic mymap 1 dyn1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
mymap map crypto inside interface
crypto ISAKMP allow inside
crypto ISAKMP policy 1
preshared authentication
3des encryption
sha hash
Group 2
life 43200
!
VPN-addr-assign aaa
VPN-addr-assign dhcp
!
internal group testgroup strategy
testgroup group policy attributes
DHCP-network-scope 10.6.192.1
enable IPSec-udp
IPSec-udp-port 10000
!
username testlay password * encrypted
!
tunnel-group testgroup type remote access
tunnel-group testgroup General attributes
strategy-group-by default testgroup
DHCP-server 10.6.20.3
testgroup group tunnel ipsec-attributes
pre-shared key *.
!
I got following output when I test connect to the ASA with Cisco VPN client 5.0
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: (4) SA (1) + KE + NUNCIO (10) + ID (5), HDR + VENDO
4024 bytesR copied in 3,41 0 seconds (1341 by(tes/sec) 13) of the SELLER (13) seller (13) + the SELLER (13), as well as the SELLER (13) ++ (0) NONE total length: 853
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, SA payload processing
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, processing ke payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing ISA_KE
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, nonce payload processing
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing ID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, received xauth V6 VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, DPD received VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, received Fragmentation VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE Peer included IKE fragmentation capability flags: Main Mode: real aggressive Mode: false
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, received NAT-Traversal worm 02 VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, the customer has received Cisco Unity VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, connection landed on tunnel_group testgroup
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE SA payload processing
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE SA proposal # 1, turn # 9 entry overall IKE acceptable matches # 1
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, build the payloads of ISAKMP security
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, building ke payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, building nonce payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, Generating keys for answering machine...
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, construction of payload ID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads of hash
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash for ISAKMP
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads of Cisco Unity VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing payload V6 VID xauth
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, building dpd vid payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing the payload of the NAT-Traversal VID ver 02
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, NAT-discovery payload construction
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash discovered NAT
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, NAT-discovery payload construction
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash discovered NAT
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, construction of Fragmentation VID + load useful functionality
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, send Altiga/Cisco VPN3000/Cisco ASA GW VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR SA (1) KE (4) NUNCIO (10) + ID (5) + HASH (8) + SELLER (13) + the SELLER (13) + the SELLER (13) + the SELLER (13) NAT - D (130) + NAT - D (130) of the SELLER (13) + the seller (13) + NONE (0) total length: 440
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + NAT - D (130) + NAT - D (130) of the SELLER (13) + the seller (13) + NONE (0) overall length: 168
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing hash payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash for ISAKMP
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing notify payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, payload NAT-discovery of treatment
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash discovered NAT
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, payload NAT-discovery of treatment
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash discovered NAT
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, useful treatment IOS/PIX Vendor ID (version: 1.0.0 capabilities: 00000408)
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, the customer has received Cisco Unity VID
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, I
[OK]
KenS-mgmt-012 # P = 10.15.200.108, status of automatic NAT detection: remote end is NOT behind a NAT device this end is NOT behind a NAT device
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, empty building hash payload
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads of hash qm
Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = d4ca48e4) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + (0) NONE total length: 72
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = d4ca48e4) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + (0) NONE total length: 87
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, process_attr(): enter!
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, transformation MODE_CFG response attributes.
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: primary DNS = authorized
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: secondary DNS = authorized
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: = authorized primary WINS
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: = authorized secondary WINS
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: Compression IP = disabled
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: Split Tunneling political = disabled
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: setting Proxy browser = no - modify
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: browser Local Proxy bypass = disable
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, (testlay) the authenticated user.
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, empty building hash payload
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads of hash qm
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = 6b1b471) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + (0) NONE total length: 64
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = 6b1b471) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + NONE (0) overall length: 60
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, process_attr(): enter!
Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, cfg ACK processing attributes
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = 49ae1bb8) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + (0) NONE total length: 182
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, process_attr(): enter!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, treatment cfg request attributes
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the IPV4 address!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the IPV4 network mask!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for DNS server address.
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the address of the WINS server.
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, transaction mode attribute unhandled received: 5
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the banner!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for setting save PW!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: receipt of request for default domain name!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for Split-Tunnel list!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for split DNS!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for PFS setting!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the Proxy Client browser setting!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the list of backup peer ip - sec!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for setting disconnect from the Client Smartcard Removal!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the Version of the Application.
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, Type of Client: Windows NT Client Application Version: 5.0.07.0440
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for FWTYPE!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: request received for the DHCP for DDNS hostname is: DEC20128!
Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the UDP Port!
Jan 16 15:39:32 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, in double Phase 2 detected packets. No last packet retransmit.
Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = b04e830f) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + (0) NONE total length: 84
Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing hash payload
Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing notify payload
Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, in double Phase 2 detected packets. No last packet retransmit.
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE has received the response from type [] at the request of the utility of IP address
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, cannot get an IP address for the remote peer
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, case of mistaken IKE TM V6 WSF (struct & 0xd8030048)
, : TM_DONE, EV_ERROR--> TM_BLD_REPLY, EV_IP_FAIL--> TM_BLD_REPLY NullEvent--> TM_BLD_REPLY, EV_GET_IP--> TM_BLD_REPLY, EV_NEED_IP--> TM_WAIT_REQ, EV_PROC_MSG--> TM_WAIT_REQ, EV_HASH_OK--> TM_WAIT_REQ, NullEvent Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, case of mistaken IKE AM Responder WSF (struct & 0xd82b6740)
, : AM_DONE, EV_ERROR--> AM_TM_INIT_MODECFG_V6H, EV_TM_FAIL--> AM_TM_INIT_MODECFG_V6H NullEvent--> AM_TM_INIT_MODECFG, EV_WAIT--> AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H, EV_CHECK_QM_MSG--> AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H, EV_TM_XAUTH_OK--> AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H NullEvent--> AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H, EV_ACTIVATE_NEW_SA Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE SA AM:bd3a9a4b ending: 0x0945c001, refcnt flags 0, tuncnt 0
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, sending clear/delete with the message of reason
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, empty building hash payload
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing the payload to delete IKE
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads of hash qm
Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = 9de30522) with payloads: HDR HASH (8) + DELETE (12) + (0) NONE total length: 80
Kind regards
Lay
For the RADIUS, you need a definition of server-aaa:
Protocol AAA - NPS RADIUS server RADIUS
AAA-server RADIUS NPS (inside) host 10.10.18.12
key *.
authentication port 1812
accounting-port 1813
and tell your tunnel-group for this server:
General-attributes of VPN Tunnel-group
Group-NPS LOCAL RADIUS authentication server
--
Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni -
VPN IPSec in LAN-2LAN tunnel configuration
Hi all!!
I'll put up a tunnel between a cisco 1841 router and a VPN 3000 Concentrator LAN LAN 2 ipsec.
Here is running for the router configuration and basically what I want to know is to ensure that I put everything in place to do this work. So can you please take a look and see if you find something a little odd and if so let me know!
*****************************************
NOTE:
1 internal addressing behind the VPN concentrator: 172.4.4.0/24
2 internal addressing behind the router CISCO 1841 172.16.20.0/24
*****************************************
version 12.4
horodateurs service debug datetime msec
Log service timestamps datetime msec
encryption password service
!
hostname UACA-VPN
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
!
No aaa new-model
!
resources policy
!
no ip source route
IP cef
no ip bootp Server
no ip domain search
!
!
! IKE policies
crypto ISAKMP policy 1
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
disable ISAKMP aggressive mode crypto
!
!
! IPSec policies
Crypto ipsec transform-set ENLACE UACA BNCR esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
!
ENLACE-UACA-BNCR 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
defined by peer 200.91.79.6
defined by peer 200.122.146.38
game of transformation-ENLACE-UACA-BNCR
address of xxxxxxxxxxxx key cryptographic ipsec 200.91.79.6
! Traffic to encrypt according to ACL 101
match address 101
interface FastEthernet0/0
WAN Interface Description VPN tunnel
IP 201.196.33.30 255.255.255.248
NAT outside IP
IP virtual-reassembly
automatic duplex
automatic speed
card crypto ENLACE UACA BNCR
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
LAN Interface Description
IP 172.16.20.22 255.255.255.0
IP nat inside
IP virtual-reassembly
automatic duplex
automatic speed
!
no ip address of the http server
no ip http secure server
! Pool VPN
!
nat pool IP VPN-pool 201.196.33.30 201.196.33.30 netmask 255.255.255.248
IP nat inside source overload map route No. - NAT VPN-pool pool
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 201.196.33.25
! Traffic is encrypted
!
access-list 101 permit ip 172.16.20.0 0.0.0.255 172.4.4.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 permit tcp 172.16.20.0 0.0.0.255 172.4.4.0 0.0.0.255 eq 1000
access-list 101 permit udp 172.16.20.0 0.0.0.255 172.4.4.0 0.0.0.255 eq 1000
! Traffic from the NAT process
!
access-list 102 deny ip 172.16.20.0 0.0.0.255 172.4.4.0 0.0.0.255
!
route No. - NAT allowed 10 map
corresponds to the IP 102
!
!
!
!
control plan
!
Line con 0
Synchronous recording
line to 0
line vty 0 4
opening of session
!
Scheduler allocate 20000 1000
****************END**********************
Thank you very much in advance for your help
Glenn
Thanks for the configuration.
So you're natting and then to encrypt traffic natted. Which is totally fine. The reason, your ping does not work after the application of cryptography is due to the ACL entries below:
access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo
access-list 101 permit icmp any any echo response
The acl entries above are part of the traffic interesting Crypto. So once you apply the card encryption the router is supposed to encrypt all ICMP Echo and Echo-Reply, including traffic that is presented with the ip address of your 201.x.x.x. If you remove these two entries of the ACL 101 and apply only the below entries, then the ICMP should work with the applied crypto map.
access-list 101 permit ip 172.4.4.0 0.0.0.255 172.17.0.64 0.0.0.7
access-list 101 permit tcp host 172.4.4.5 host 172.17.0.65 eq 1000
access-list 101 permit udp host 172.4.4.5 host 172.17.0.65 eq 1000
After making the changes, make sure that crypto acl is images mirror on VPN3000 and router, or otherwise you will have problems in the implementation of the tunnel.
I would like to know how the test goes without the ACL 101 ICMP entries.
Kind regards
Arul
-
Is site to site VPN with sufficiently secure router?
Hello
I have a question about the site to site VPN with router.
Internet <> router <> LAN
If I have a VPN site-to-site configured on the router above with another site. I configured to block incoming Internet connections with the exception of VPN to access list. What are the risks of the LAN is exposed to threats from the Internet? Recommend that you put in a firewall between the router and the LAN, or replace the router with a firewall?
Thank you
Hi Amanda,.
Assuming your L2L looks like this:
LAN - router - INTERNET - Router_Remote - LAN
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
L2L
Traffic between the two local area networks is protected by the VPN tunnel. It is recommended to use the recommended security (strong encryption settings) to ensure that the encrypted traffic would not be compromised through the Internet.
On the other hand, if you talk about outbound plaintext to the Internet, as when a user acceses google.com, then you just make out traffic, but never allow all incoming connections.
If you want to protect your network with advanced security as a FW features, you can consider ZBF, which is the available in IOS Firewall/set function:
Design of the area Guide of Application and firewall policies
If you consider that this is not enough, check the ASA5500 series.
HTH.
Portu.
Please note all useful posts
-
iPhone 5 use with w - lan only?
Hello, it is possible to use the iphone 5 without sim, with w - lan only? For the first installations, later with the sim card? IPhone 4 doesn't work without a sim card. Thank you
You will need to have a sim card in the phone to activate when first implemented, after that you can remove the sim card and use it with wifi only.
-
I use a Windows Vista Home Edition on a laptop. The system connects to the Internet through a cellular router EDGE (via Ethernet) and receives the data by linking receiver DVB - S2 satellite broadband connected via a USB interface. The connection is through a VPN. Windows Vista loses the symbol of the "blue planet", as soon as the VPN connects. Authentication and connectivity is OK. DNS also works OK by the way VPN, with pointing to the VPN IP address 0.0.0.0. The diagnosis indicates an error where Vista says that she finds multiple active dial connections. Y at - it a configuration option that allows me to bind the interface transmission (VPN) with return channel satellite? The same software and configuration under Windows XP SP3 works OK.
Thanks in advance for your advice.
Hello
Your question of Windows 7 is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the Technet Forum. You can follow the link to your question:
http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/w7itproYou can also check the links below for assistance.
http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc728078 (WS.10) .aspx
http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc737767 (WS.10) .aspx
Hope that helps.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Mailboxes are not visible in mail after you run the OS El Capitan 10.11.5 upgrade.
Mailboxes are not visible in mail after you run the OS El Capitan 10.11.5 upgrade. The boxes are there (somewhere), and I can save the messages in them. I can just see them or call back messages on my macbook air. Structure of messaging and mailbo
-
How do you export groups of tabs, bookmarks, and history fron a computer to another computer
I found myself replacing my computer for various reasons and need to recover all my data from my old computer to the new. However, when it came to Firefox and my groups of tabs, bookmarks and history, I have not found any real way to export them to t
-
Satellite A210 a1o: question of the motherboard chipset
Hello Can someone tell me who is the manufacturer of the chipset of the mother card? I have the model psaele. And I search drivers xp, so I can't find sm bus controller.Thanks in advance.
-
I have not seen a thread here on the new model, so I thought I would ask here. The published specifications state that the laptop is expandable up to 16 GB of ram. However, I run CPU - Z to check the installed memory. It is said there are two stic
-
The icons on my desktop are much too big, just like the rest of my programs.
Desktop and Personization The icons on my desktop are much too big, just like the rest of my programs. My emails are so great, I can't get them all on the screen. Are entered in Customizing, I can't find the settings of anywhere. This seems to occur