VPN to access LAN VPN clinet.

Similar Questions

• Using Cisco IOS Firewall VPN clinet

  Hello

  I configured RTR1 to support VPN Clients. RTR1 has a site 2 RTR 2 site VPN tunnel.

  Customer VPN connected to RTR1 have RTR1 LAN IP connectivity. How can I get the VPN Client LAN to access the local network RTR2?

  I've included the VPN Client LAN to be ecrypted in the VPN tunnel to the LAN RTR2 and Vice Versa. I also tried a static router configured on RTR2 for the LAN of Client VPN IP WAN RTR1 serving of next hop.

  Still doesn't work is not for me. Any ideas?

  Thank you

  The other side added your remote VPN client pool to its configuration? The remote site must know its interesting traffic as well. Is RTR2 NAT'ing? Cleaned the configs for the two routers would help a lot.

• Router Cisco ASA or IOS may be a SSL VPN clinet?

  I would like to know if the router Cisco ASA or IOS may be a customer of SSL VPN? Thank you.

  I'm glad to hear that.

  Indeed the ASA5505 and Cisco routers can be EzVPN customers.

  Please mark this question as answered if you have any other questions.

  Let me know.

  The rate of any position that you be useful.

• Allow access LAN Local - security issues?

  I started researching on why our users in a remote office (not connected through link from site to site) do not have no print on their network printer, even if the checkbox for allow local LAN access on the Cisco VPN Client has been checked.

  This led me to the next on the Cisco site document:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080702992.shtml

  After seeing this feature turned on, and work with many large companies, I have a few questions:

  • This solution seems to differ from true split tunneling scenario and unencrypted traffic is sent and received from the internal network. Being that this is the case, is it really necessary to worry?
  • Each PC to the remote office is managed and contains a set of fully implemented up-to-date Antivirus software. Would not avoid any concerns coming from the PC itself? This would not eliminate the fear that this PC could act as a relay for the bad guys?
  • If the computer has been infected, how it would act as a relay? Wouldn't it pose a threat without worrying about whether the option allow local LAN access has been activated or not? After all, we would still be able to tunnel through.
  • There is a concern that a hacker might be able to hack into the computer internally and use local lan access for this benefit?

  You try to understand why this isn't a good idea.

  Nelson

  The largest part of your question seems to derive from the assumption that allow Local LAN access is not a good thing. I would not necessarily agree with this hypothesis.

  Clearly, the default behavior is to not allow Local LAN access. I think that it is a default behavior that is appropriate as it puts the VPN client in the safest position. But according to the situation of your organization, it may very well be a good thing to allow Local LAN access.

  I offer these points in response to the specific questions you ask:

  -Yes, it is different from the real split tunneling. I think that the level of concern may be different from zero, but it's a pretty small problem.

  -While having a fully updated anti-virus software reduces the possibility of the compromised computer it does not entirely eliminate this possibility.

  -It is true that the PC could be already compromised/infected and would pose a threat. Allowing LAN access Eve shows a very slight increase in the risk that the PC is compromised while on the line.

  -There is a very low risk that an attacker could compromise another device on the Local network and this machine could compromise the PC with the VPN client, while he was online.

  If your business is in an environment that requires a VERY high level of the implementation of the Security (maybe Heath Care or Financial Services come to mind), then perhaps you would worry about the risk of allowing the Local LAN access. For most of us, the risk is negligible.

  HTH

  Rick

• ASA5505 DMZ to access LAN

  Hi, I wonder if anyone has a quick solution to my problem here. We have several servers on the DMZ (192.168.2.0/24), but they cannot access all the resources inside, by default. We would like to open an inside (10.1.1.5) Syslog server to the servers in the DMZ, then we can collect syslog servers. What is the best way to set this up?

  Thank you.

  Hello

  The standard syslog servers use udp/514. Once you configure the syslog IP address in your DMZ servers, the connection will be inititiated DMZ to internal syslog server. You must configure accesslist to distribute this...

  !

  DMZ2IN list extended access permitted udp 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.5 host eq 514

  !

  You already have an existing ACL for the servers in the DMZ for internet access. Then apply in the appropriate order.

  HTH

  MS

• Access LAN of VM inside when ESXi5 by an ESXi4 as a VM guest

  I have ESXi5 running on real hardware with static IP 192.168.2.20

  There are two vCenter Server IP 192.168.2.21 and also with static IP 192.168.2.10 ESXi4 VMS

  The virtual ESXi4 machine has only a single virtual machine with WIndows XP operating system. New static IP 192.168.2.12

  I can access and manage the two hosts ESXi5 and ESXi4 with vClient.

  With the help of the ESXi4 console I can connect to the Windows XP virtual machine

  This VM I can ping the ESXi4 host, but I can't not like ESXi5 or my network.

  I only have a single network adapter physical - on ESXi5 the onserved IP address range is of 0.0.0.1 - 255.255.255.254 on ESXi4 VMS 10.1.1.4 - 10.1.1.4

  Thanks in advance for your suggestions

  I think you're going to need game "Promiscuous Mode" to Accept on vSwitch and port group configured on the ESXi 5 physical host for this to work.

  Host-> Configuration-> network-> vSwitch properties

  Change the vSwitch, and on the Security tab, set mode to Accept Promisuous.

  I hope this helps.

  Hersey

• No access LAN via D7000 downloading

  Hi all

  I've been a happy customer until I discovered this problem. Now, I'm downloading a file of 110 MB on my Google Reader via the web, in time, I decide to do in my other PC via remote desktop, in my local network, and it does not work!

  The D7000 is so busy to transfer this file which is not able to do anything else! What type of piece of engineering is it?

  I suggest to read section 6 of the manual user "optimize Performance" and look at the QoS

  http://www.downloads.NETGEAR.com/files/GDC/D7000/D7000_UM_EN.PDF

  Hope this helps

• M277dw MFP: color laserjet pro problems of m277dw mfp with access LAN on Mac OX El Capitan

  Impression on the local network with MAC OS causes problems with intermittend. Somethimes it works, often if you use after the first impression of another pc or lap top no printing is possible. Sometimes the errormessage "oder impression was not accepted" takes place. The same problem exists with the option of analysis.

  If the printer is connected via an Ethernet cable, then:

  1. On the printer, click Setup.
  2. Click on network settings.
  3. Click on restore by default.
  4. Turn the printer off and on again.

  Please let me know if this can help with your network issues.

• VPN connects but no remote LAN access

  Hello

  I'll put up on a PIX 501 VPN remote access.

  When I try to connect via VPN software, I am able to connect but I am unable to access LAN resources.

  I have pasted below part of which seems relevant to my setup. I'm stuck on this issue, could someone help me? Thanks in advance.

  ethernet0 nameif outside security0
  nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
  test.local domain name
  name 10.0.2.0 inside
  name 10.0.2.13 MSExchange-en
  2.2.2.2 the MSExchange-out name

  outside_access_in tcp allowed access list all gt 1023 host 2.2.2.2 eq smtp
  outside_access_in list access permit tcp any host 2.2.2.2 eq https
  outside_access_in list access permit tcp any host 2.2.2.2 eq www
  inside_outbound_nat0_acl 10.0.2.0 ip access list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.235.0 255.255.255.192
  access-list 101 permit icmp any one

  3.3.3.3 exterior IP address 255.255.255.0
  IP address inside 10.0.2.254 255.255.255.0
  IP local pool vpn_pool 192.168.235.1 - 192.168.235.15
  IP local pool vpn_pool_2 192.168.235.16 - 192.168.235.40

  1 3.3.3.4 (outside) global
  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_outbound_nat0_acl
  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0
  static (inside, outside) 2.2.2.2 10.0.2.13 netmask 255.255.255.255 1000 1000
  Access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.1 1

  RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server
  AAA-server RADIUS (inside) host 10.0.2.3 * timeout 10
  AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10 game of transformation-ESP-3DES-MD5
  map outside_map 90-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap
  card crypto outside_map the LOCAL RADIUS client authentication
  outside_map interface card crypto outside
  ISAKMP allows outside
  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 20
  ISAKMP policy 20 3des encryption
  ISAKMP policy 20 md5 hash
  20 2 ISAKMP policy group
  ISAKMP duration strategy of life 20 86400
  vpngroup signal address vpn_pool pool
  vpngroup dns-server 10.0.2.3 signal
  vpngroup default-field test.local signal
  vpngroup idle time 1800 signal
  vpngroup max-time 14400 signal
  signal vpngroup password *.
  vpngroup TF vpn_pool_2 address pool
  vpngroup dns-server 10.0.2.3 TF
  TF vpngroup default-domain test.local
  vpngroup TF 1800 idle time
  vpngroup max-time 14400 TF
  TF vpngroup password *.

  Kind regards

  Joana

  Very similar to the question of the configuration of the switch. You should check if there is no specific roads on the switch outside the default gateway. The switch should route the subnet pool ip to the firewall (10.0.2.254).

• 506th PIX VPN CAAN connect, but no LAN

  Heelo, we have a 506E with 6.3 (3). We want to use Cisco VPN clinet to connect and can do, but cannot ping on the local network or connect to servers... Need help wih configurations because we are novice maybe... Can someone look through the attached config. and see if we have forgotten something... Thank you

  Change your pool outside 192.168.2.0/24.

  IP local pool vpnpool 192.168.x.60 - 192.168.x.63

  Then add an acl of exemption nat for this network.

  access-list sheep permit ip 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.x.0

  NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep

  Then, also change your acl of tunnel from split to reflect the new pool

  permit ip 192.168.2.0 access list SplitTunnel 255.255.255.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.x.0

• Through remote access vpn Ipsec within the host is not available.

  Team,

  I have a question in confiuration vpn crossed.

  ASA 3,0000 Version 5

  the only question is, to access remote vpn clinet IP cannot access inside the host. However able to reach the branch of IP and it uses corprate Internet.

  In SAA from the external interface I am able to ping remote clint IP but not from within the interface. Please help and let me know if additional information is required.

  Thank you

  Knockaert

  Hello

  For the NAT0 configuration, you only need NAT0 instruction for the interface "inside".

  This single command/ACL should allow for 'inside' <-->'vpn-pool' communication.

  NAT0 configurations on the 'external' interface should be necessary only if you make NAT0 between 2 VPN connections. I guess you could do this since you mention traffic crossed?

  I suggest using different 'object-group' to define networks of NAT0 destination for different ' object-group' to the 'outside' to 'outside' and 'inside' users NAT0.

  I also obsessively using beaches too wide network in the statements of NAT0. According to some records, they can cause problems

  For example, this network ' object-network 172.16.0.0 255.240.0.0 "contains the 172.x.x.x.x set private IP address range. And in this case it contains some of your 'inside' networks too?

  How is this a problem of crossed by the way? You say that the problem is between the VPN clients on the 'external' interface and network local hosts behind the 'internal '? Crossed would mean you have connection problem between 'outside' <->'outside' perhaps.

  I don't know if I made any sense. Can be a bit messy. But can not give very specific answers that I don't know the entire configuration.

  Also make sure you have the "inspect icmp" configured under the policy-map of the world, so that the response to ICMP echo messages are automatically allowed through the ASA.

  -Jouni

• INTERNET does not immediately work VPN

  Hello

  I've been working to resolve the problem on the network of vpn cisco eazy extented for a week. While the VPN is connected internet does not work, I thought it was the remote side, now I think it might be because secondary server configuration question I try serveral on-site the same configuration for the remote side internet is getting lost for the user. still can ping 4.2.2.2 for the router itself. Please help me solve this problem.,.

  Router config HO

  !
  !
  AAA authentication login userauthen local
  AAA authorization groupauthor LAN
  !
  !
  AAA - the id of the joint session
  iomem 15 memory size
  IP cef
  !
  !
  !
  !

  !
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 3
  BA 3des
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  !
  Configuration group social isakmp crypto-seat customer
  pass123 keys
  pool ippool
  ACL 101
  Save-password
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac RIGHT
  !
  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10
  Set transform-set RIGHT
  market arriere-route
  !
  !
  !
  map clientmap client to authenticate crypto list userauthen
  card crypto clientmap isakmp authorization list groupauthor
  client configuration address map clientmap crypto answer
  10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap Dynamics dynmap
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/0
  IP address xx.xx.xx.xy 255.255.255.248
  penetration of the IP stream
  stream IP output
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  route IP cache flow
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  clientmap card crypto
  !
  interface FastEthernet0/1
  192.168.0.166-IP address 255.255.255.0
  IP nat inside
  IP virtual-reassembly
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  !
  local pool IP 10.10.10.10 ippool 10.10.10.200
  IP forward-Protocol ND
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xx.xx.xx.yx
  !

  IP http server
  IP http secure server
  The dns server IP
  overload of IP nat inside source list 111 interface FastEthernet0/0
  !
  access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.200.192.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.172.16.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 104. allow ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 any
  access-list 104. allow ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 any what newspaper
  access-list 111 deny ip host 192.168.0.16 everything
  access-list 111 deny ip host 192.168.0.16 no matter what paper
  access-list 111 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 111 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 connect
  access-list 111 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 111 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.200.192.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 111 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 111 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.172.16.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 111 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
  access ip-list 111 allow a whole
  access-list 133 deny ip host 192.168.0.16 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
  !

  Remote Desktop

  Router #show run
  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 2243 bytes
  !
  ! Last modification of the configuration at 08:34:12 UTC kills Sep 18 2012
  ! NVRAM config updated at 08:34:14 UTC killed Sep 18 2012
  ! NVRAM config updated at 08:34:14 UTC killed Sep 18 2012
  version 15.1
  no service button
  horodateurs service debug datetime msec
  Log service timestamps datetime msec
  no password encryption service
  !
  router host name
  !
  boot-start-marker
  boot-end-marker
  !
  !
  Select the secret 4 6Uhgk1ATmwo4j3eoSZScCqsB/Q1llvengtFuqfN8mh6
  !
  AAA new-model
  !
  !
  AAA authentication login default local
  AAA authorization network default local
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  AAA - the id of the joint session
  !
  iomem 10 memory size
  Crypto pki token removal timeout default 0
  !
  !
  IP source-route
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  IP cef
  M name server IP
  M name server IP
  No ipv6 cef
  !
  !
  !
  0 user username password Cisco
  !
  !
  !
  !
  VDSL controller 0
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec VPN-REMOTE-OFFICE ezvpn client
  connect auto
  Group seat key pass123 social
  network extension mode
  XX.XX.XX.xy peer
  user username password Cisco
  xauth userid local mode
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  interface Ethernet0
  no ip address
  Shutdown
  no fair queue
  !
  ATM0 interface
  no ip address
  No atm ilmi-keepalive
  !
  point-to-point interface ATM0.1
  PVC 8/35
  aal5mux encapsulation ppp Dialer
  Dialer pool-member 1
  !
  !
  interface FastEthernet0
  no ip address
  !
  interface FastEthernet1
  no ip address
  !
  interface FastEthernet2
  no ip address
  !
  interface FastEthernet3
  no ip address
  !
  interface Vlan1
  IP 10.200.192.1 255.255.255.0
  IP nat inside
  IP virtual-reassembly in
  ezvpn client crypto ipsec VPN-DESKTOP-remote CONTROL inside
  !
  interface Dialer0
  the negotiated IP address
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly in
  encapsulation ppp
  Dialer pool 1
  Dialer-Group 1
  PPP chap hostname xxxxxxx
  PPP chap password 0 yyyyy
  Crypto ipsec VPN-REMOTE-OFFICE ezvpn client
  !
  IP forward-Protocol ND
  no ip address of the http server
  no ip http secure server
  !
  !
  The dns server IP
  overload of IP nat inside source list 120 interface Dialer0
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
  !
  access-list 120 deny ip 10.200.192.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 120 allow ip 10.200.192.0 0.0.0.255 any

  Note: no problem when you use a VPN clinet software

  Looks like you're hit this bug: CSCtj63428:

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtj63428

  You can change the configuration of the Easy VPN NEM mode just the VPN LAN-to-LAN tunnel, or demote according to listed in the bug workaround solution to solve the problem.

• VPN tunnel cascade w / SW NSA FWs

  

  Hello

  I have questions about VPN cascading between 3 firewall SonicWALL NSA. Let me explain my situation and what I want to achieve.

  As shown in the diagram above, I have 3 branches connected to the Internet, which advanced to the LAN is the NSA SW FW. There is a VPN tunnel between each site: Site_A Site_ B, Site_A Site_ C, Site_B Site_ C. The Internet of the Site A traffic is redirected to the Site B. This Site A Cross Site B to access the Internet and LAN B. Site A through C access LAN C Site.

  My question is: is it possible to remove the tunnel VPN Site_A-Site_C to and instead, through Site B to C LAN access? If so, how you can achieve this configuration?

  What worries me is the VPN tunnel options that allow you to redirect all Internet traffic or a specific destination of LAN through objects (screenshots from Site A) address:

  

  

  Without the redirection of Internet traffic, I thought about creating a group of addresses, including 2 B LAN and LAN C address objects. But I want to keep the Internet through Site B traffic redirection.

  What do you think?

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Hello

  My comments below:

  If you route indeed all traffic from A to B, the following must fill.

  1. remove the tunnel A C

  Ok.

  2. site B will have A subnet that is defined as a local resource for C

  Do you mean this by local resource?

  

  3 C is going to have A subnet defined as remote resource

  Ok.

  If you route any traffic from A to B, the following must fill.

  First step would be to remove the tunnel VPN between A and C, but I guess that you have assumed that it was already done.

  1. define the C subnet as a remote resource on Site A

  Yes, like a remote network for the A - B VPN tunnel.

  2. tunnel of site B to A will need to subnet C defined as local resource

  Ok.

  3. tunnel of site B and C will need subnet defined as local resource

  Ok.

  4. the site will need to subnet C has defined as remote resource

  Yes.

  I'll do a test soon with 3 sites and see how it goes.

• How to apply internet traffic in VPN tunnel users

  Hello

  Perhaps it is a simple matter to most of you, but it confuses me right now.

  Here's my situation:

  home - internet - ASA 5510 users - CORP LAN

  We have remote Ipsec VPN and anyconnect VPN, I think that the solution must work on two of them.

  My question is: "how to apply internet traffic user home to the VPN tunnel?

  We have "split tunnel" to only"'interesting traffic' VPN tunnel access LAN CORP.

  but now I need apply all traffic (internet + CORP LAN) user through VPN tunnel passes.

  so far, I did what I know:

  1. remove the "split tunnle" group policy

  2. the address in "remote user VPN address pool" are perhaps NAT/PAT travers ASA5510

  but I don't get why it doesn't work.

  all suggestions are appreciate!

  Thank you!

  A few things to configure:

  (1) Split tunnel policy to be passed under split in tunnelall tunnel

  (2) configure NAT on the external interface to PAT to the same global address.

  (3) configure "allowed same-security-traffic intra-interface" so that the tunnel VPN for Internet traffic can make a u-turn.

  Please share the current configuration if the foregoing still does not solve the problem. Thank you.

• Router WAN double with SSL VPN inaccessible for customers

  I have a configured in a Dual WAN setup Cisco 888. There is an ADSL link connected to the VLAN 100 and a SDSL link associated with the Dialer0. The customer wishes to use the ADSL link to the normal navigation and external SSL VPN users to complete on the SDSL connection. I tried to configure the link failover for the ADSL SDSL.

  What works:

  -Access to the Internet for clients the

  What does not work:

  -The ADSL SDSL connection failover.

  -Access SSL VPN for customers. Surf to the external IP address will cause only a page by default HTTP. Specification webvpn.html results in a 404 not found error.

  Here is my configuration:

  version 15.0

  no service button

  horodateurs service debug datetime msec

  Log service timestamps datetime msec

  no password encryption service

  !

  host name x

  !

  boot-start-marker

  boot-end-marker

  !

  logging buffered 51200 warnings

  enable secret 5 x

  !

  AAA new-model

  !

  !

  AAA authentication login local sslvpn

  !

  !

  !

  !

  !

  AAA - the id of the joint session

  iomem 10 memory size

  !

  Crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-3964912732

  enrollment selfsigned

  name of the object cn = IOS - Self - signed - certificate - 3964912732

  revocation checking no

  rsakeypair TP-self-signed-3964912732

  !

  !

  TP-self-signed-3964912732 crypto pki certificate chain

  self-signed certificate 03

  x

  quit smoking

  IP source-route

  !

  !

  IP dhcp excluded-address 192.168.10.254

  DHCP excluded-address IP 192.168.10.10 192.168.10.20

  !

  DHCP IP CCP-pool

  import all

  network 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0

  default router 192.168.10.254

  DNS-server 213.75.63.36 213.75.63.70

  Rental 2 0

  !

  !

  IP cef

  no ip domain search

  property intellectual name x

  No ipv6 cef

  !

  !

  udi pid CISCO888-K9 sn x license

  !

  !

  username secret privilege 15 ciscoadmin 5 x

  username password vpnuser 0 x

  !

  !

  LAN controller 0

  atm mode

  Annex symmetrical shdsl DSL-mode B

  !

  interface Loopback1

  Gateway SSL dhcp pool address description

  IP 192.168.250.1 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface Loopback2

  Description address IP VPN SSL

  IP 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0

  route PBR_SSL card intellectual property policy

  !

  interface BRI0

  no ip address

  encapsulation hdlc

  Shutdown

  Multidrop ISDN endpoint

  !

  ATM0 interface

  no ip address

  load-interval 30

  No atm ilmi-keepalive

  PVC KPN 2/32

  aal5mux encapsulation ppp Dialer

  Dialer pool-member 1

  !

  !

  interface FastEthernet0

  switchport access vlan 100

  !

  interface FastEthernet1

  !

  interface FastEthernet2

  !

  interface FastEthernet3

  !

  interface Vlan1

  LAN description

  IP address 192.168.10.254 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside

  IP virtual-reassembly

  IP tcp adjust-mss 1300

  !

  interface Vlan100

  Description KPN ADSL 20/1

  DHCP IP address

  NAT outside IP

  IP virtual-reassembly

  !

  interface Dialer0

  Description KPN SDSL 2/2

  the negotiated IP address

  IP access-group INTERNET_ACL in

  NAT outside IP

  IP virtual-reassembly

  encapsulation ppp

  Dialer pool 1

  Dialer-Group 1

  PPP pap sent-username password 0 x x

  No cdp enable

  !

  IP local pool sslvpnpool 192.168.250.2 192.168.250.100

  IP forward-Protocol ND

  IP http server

  local IP http authentication

  IP http secure server

  IP http timeout policy slowed down 60 life 86400 request 10000

  !

  pool nat SSLVPN SDSL 10.10.10.1 IP 10.10.10.1 netmask 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.10.1 443 interface Dialer0 443

  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.10.1 80 Dialer0 80 interface

  IP nat inside source overload map route NAT_ADSL Vlan100 interface

  IP nat inside source overload map route NAT_SDSL pool SSLVPN SDSL

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0 10

  !

  INTERNET_ACL extended IP access list

  Note: used with CBAC

  allow all all unreachable icmp

  allow icmp all a package-too-big

  allow icmp all once exceed

  allow any host 92.64.32.169 eq 443 tcp www

  deny ip any any newspaper

  Extended access LAN IP-list

  permit ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 any

  refuse an entire ip

  !

  Dialer-list 1 ip protocol allow

  not run cdp

  !

  !

  !

  !

  NAT_SDSL allowed 10 route map

  match the LAN ip address

  match interface Dialer0

  !

  NAT_ADSL allowed 10 route map

  match the LAN ip address

  match interface Vlan100

  !

  PBR_SSL allowed 10 route map

  set interface Dialer0

  !

  !

  control plan

  !

  !

  Line con 0

  no activation of the modem

  line to 0

  line vty 0 4

  privilege level 15

  transport input telnet ssh

  !

  max-task-time 5000 Planner

  !

  WebVPN MyGateway gateway

  hostname d0c

  IP address 10.10.10.1 port 443

  redirect http port 80

  SSL trustpoint TP-self-signed-3964912732

  development

  !

  WebVPN install svc flash:/webvpn/anyconnect-dart-win-2.5.0217-k9.pkg sequence 1

  !

  WebVPN install svc flash:/webvpn/anyconnect-macosx-i386-2.5.0217-k9.pkg sequence 2

  !

  WebVPN install svc flash:/webvpn/anyconnect-macosx-powerpc-2.5.0217-k9.pkg sequence 3

  !

  WebVPN context SecureMeContext

  title "SSL VPN Service"

  secondary-color #C0C0C0

  title-color #808080

  SSL authentication check all

  !

  login message "VPN".

  !

  Group Policy MyDefaultPolicy

  functions compatible svc

  SVC-pool of addresses "sslvpnpool."

  SVC Dungeon-client-installed

  Group Policy - by default-MyDefaultPolicy

  AAA authentication list sslvpn

  Gateway MyGateway

  development

  !

  end

  Any suggestions on where to look?

  Hello

  It works for me. When the client tries to resolve the fqdn for the domain specified in "svc split dns.." he will contact the DNS server assigned through the Tunnel. For all other questions, he contacts the DNS outside the Tunnel.

  You can run a capture of packets on the physical interface on the Client to see the query DNS leaving?

  Also in some routers, DNS is designated as the router itself (who is usually address 192.168.X.X), if you want to make sure that assigned DNS server doesn't not part of the Split Tunnel.

  Naman