PIX - static and port redirection to the same host

Version 6.2 of the PIX

I was watching the following config:

static (inside, outside) 172.18.124.99 tcp telnet 10.1.1.6 telnet netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (inside, outside) 172.18.124.99 tcp ftp 10.1.1.3 ftp netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (inside, outside) 172.18.124.208 tcp telnet 10.1.1.4 telnet netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface 10.1.1.5 telnet telnet netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface 10.1.1.5 www www netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (inside, outside) tcp 172.18.124.208 www 8080 10.1.1.7 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

go to this URL,

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a0080094aad.shtml#topic11

and I was wondering if the following configuration will work or not:

static (Inside, Outside) 172.18.124.10 TCP 10.1.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (Inside, Outside) 172.18.124.10 TCP 10.1.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

Thanks in advance for any input.

Ariel

Yes, it'll be OK. What you can't have is the following:

static (Inside, Outside) 172.18.124.10 TCP 10.1.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (Inside, Outside) 172.18.124.10 TCP 10.1.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

and you can't have:

static (Inside, Outside) 172.18.124.10 TCP 10.1.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

static (Inside, Outside) 172.18.124.10 TCP 10.1.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

In other words, you cannot map the port itself to two different ports, in both directions. The PIX will get confused when it receives a packet on the duplicate port and does not know what a host to map to. As everything inside and outside ports map to unique ports on the other interface then you're OK.

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • VShield service Manager installation and vShield app to the same host ESXi

    Hello, I'm planning on vCloud Director assessment in a laboratory with only a single ESXi host.  When I try to install the app vShield service I get the following warning: do not install on a host or a cluster where the VC or the vShield Manager resides. This can cause network problems. The following IP address must be a unique IP address assigned to this unit of App vShield. Please do not use an IP address that is assigned to another machine, including the VC, vShield Manager or any ESX host. Using an incorrect IP address you will need to uninstall and reinstall App vShield on this host. My question is: is it is absolutely impossible to install vShield manager on the same host ESXi as the vShield Manager resides?  Or is it just a bad practice?  What are the ramifications of installing?

    It is a general practice to separate management and resources. What you see is just a warning. When there are very fewer resources available you can do. Make sure that you exclude from the required VM by referring to this post

    http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2012/03/17/excluding-your-vCenter-server-from-VShield-app-protection/

  • Method for patching only host ESXi4.1 and VC is on the same host

    Hello people,

    I'm patching one of the ESXi, 4.1.0 348481 and Vcenter Server 4.1 Update1 (VM) is sitting on the same host ESXi. Please let me know how I can this patch

    a single host as the Vcenter also will restart. I'm looking to patch manually rather than Update Manager. How patch manually the ESXi host as there is no rounds in ESXi and what serves the Cli. If his VCLI then what is the command for the application of patches and download link. I'm looking to get the procedure. Any help on this

    will be well appreciated.

    Thank you

    vmguy

    If you have another host, you can vMotion your VM vCenter to it, then use AUVS to patch.  If a stand-alone host, then you will need to turn off vCenter and all the guests and try the method below

    http://communities.VMware.com/people/vmroyale/blog/2010/12/27/single-use-vihostupdate-how-to-for-ESXi-4x

  • The s/w and h/w on the same host iSCSI initiators.

    Hello

    Can someone tell me if both software and hardware on the same host iSCSI initiators and looking the same LUN is supported in ESX3.5U5, 4.0U2 and 4.1.

    If this isn't the case, please give me the URL of any article of vmware goes in the same.

    Thank you

    P Martin

    The closest would be on page 28 of the 4.1 "iSCSI SAN slot Guide.

    http://www.VMware.com/PDF/vSphere4/R41/vsp_41_iscsi_san_cfg.PDF

    Because the software initiator ESX is definitely a charge adapter, this could be considered to be applicable.

    In spite of being is not clearly established, there is no summer tested enough to be considered as support even if there are no known issues.

    Andy

  • Static and dynamic NAT at the same time?

    Is this possible? Let's say you have 20 public address pool and you have 30 computers LAN. You want to assign the same public address for some of the servers. And the rest can get the addresses of the pool at random.

    It would be nice if we can easily do the appropriate firewall rules.

    Yes, it is possible, you can use nat and global commands for dynamic conversion and use the static commands for static translation at the same time.

    Here is an example:

    Public rate IP-range outdoors: xxx.xxx.xxx.0/27

    (IP addresses are xxx.xxx.xxx.1 - xxx.xxx.xxx.30)

    Private range of IP addresses on the inside: yyy.yyy.yyy.0/24

    In the example I'm going to static translate xxx.xxx.xxx.2 to yyy.yyy.yyy.2 Server1 (ditto for server2, but by using adresse.3)

    All other IP addresses is translated dynamics.

    Here is an example of how you can do this:

    IP address outside xxx.xxx.xxx.1 255.255.255.224

    IP address yyy.yyy.yyy.1 255.255.255.0 inside

    NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep

    NAT (inside) 1 yyy.yyy.yyy.0 255.255.255.0

    Global 1 interface (outside)

    public static yyy.yyy.yyy.2 xxx.xxx.xxx.2 (indoor, outdoor)

    public static yyy.yyy.yyy.3 xxx.xxx.xxx.3 (indoor, outdoor)

    access-list deny ip host yyy.yyy.yyy.2 sheep all

    access-list deny ip host yyy.yyy.yyy.3 sheep all

    access-list sheep ip allow a whole

    Kind regards

    Leo

  • How to use vGPU and vSGA both on the same host vSphere 6.0

    I tested vGPU on a host vSphere 6.0 to 6.1 of the Horizon, and I would now add a vSGA pool to this host. Only two physical GPU is used with the two vGPU vm that I turned on.

    My question is, what should I do to make this Host allow compatible vSGA VM turning on and share resources on the other two other GPU?  I put the office pool to use the 'Material' 3D rendering engine and added a VM pool.

    When I try to turn on the virtual machine, I get this error message in vSphere client Web:

    "GPU hardware is required but not available. The virtual machine will not start until the GPU resources are available or the virtual machine is configured to allow software rendering. »

    It's the output of command line gpuvm and nvidia-smi:

    gpuvm_nvidia-smi.png

    The host ESXi 6.0 has two cards of K2 of GRID for a total of 4 GPUS. Only two vGPU-enabled vm is turned on, it seems that I can use the other two GPU for vSGA VM, right?

    It is currently not possible since the Nvidia VIB:s vSGA and vGPU cannot be loaded at the same time.

    The driver will claim all compatible GPU:s (except those configured for passthrough, IE vDGA)

    An exception to this rule is if you have an AMD GPU for vSGA and a Nvidia GPU for vGPU.

    Can't comment on if, and when this will be resolved, perhaps krd can do.

    Linjo

  • Termination of the client PIX VPN and Internet access from the same interface

    Hello

    VPN remote users connect to PIX (7.2) outside interface, but need to have these clients to access the Internet through the PIX outside interface as well. Need this because PIX IPs is registered and allowed access to some electronic libraries. One way would be to set up a proxy within the network and vpn users have access to the Internet through the proxy, but can it be done without proxy?

    Yes, public internet on a stick

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml

  • Internal network for clients on the same host?

    Is it possible to set up an internal network so that if the VMS and B are on the same host and tried to access B (or vice versa), all network traffic will be handled internally by ESXi without the need to go upstream?

    Hello

    This is the behavior by default when two virtual machines are on the same portgroup and in the same VLAN.

    Traffic will not leave the vSwitch in this case.

    If you want the virtual machines only isolate the virtual machines from the outside network, you can create a new portgroup for them and do not add physical network cards to the portgroup.

    This way, the virtual machines can communicate with each other.

    Tim

  • How to set up primary Oracle & Eve on the same host on windows 2003

    Hello

    Please could someone give the steps to configure oracle 10g primary and standby database on the same host with windows server 2003.

    Thanks in advance...

    See you soon.
    Anil

    other general procedures LOCK_NAME_SPACE will be necessary.
    [http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14237/initparams096.htm#REFRN10083]

  • Satellite A200 - 14 d - i.LINK and FireWire - it's the same thing?

    Hi, guys :)

    Well, I'm about accurately - and a new external hard drive My Book by W * digital Stern (the Studio Edition with 1 TB of storage).
    So I have a Toshiba Satellite A200 - 14 d. I read in the manual to my laptop it has port i.LINK (IEEE 1394-a).

    Ext.hard My Book drive has FireWire 400/800. I read on the internet that FireWire and i.LINK are the same for the IEEE 1394 standard.
    They're just different names. i.LINK is by S * ny and FireWire is by Ap * the Inc. Because I'm not sure I would ask here: if I connect an external device (in my case - ext.hard drive) which is supposed to be with the ability to connect via FireWire 400/800 to my laptop i.LINK port, there will be a kind of incompatibility?

    Thanks in advance!

    Hello

    Yes, i.Link, firewire or IEEE 1394 has the same meaning. ;)

    See this Wikipedia article on firewire:
    http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/FireWire

    Welcome them

  • You try to run a Site to site VPN and remote VPN from the same IP remotely

    We currently have a site to site VPN configuration between our offices call center and a 3rd party that allows them to access our training to their employees to use environment while being trained on our systems. This tunnel is running between our ASA and their ASA without problem; However, when we have managers come out to the call center, they are unable to use remote VPN to access our office.

    Apparently the same IP peer remote that we use for our site to the other tunnel is the same IP that our managers use to access the internet when they are on-site with the customer. When I look at the logs it shows the VPN attempt and then I get treatment Information Exchange has failed. So from what I can understand when our managers are trying to connect to our firewall from the same IP address as the counterpart of site to site it automatically tries to create a tunnel, according to the information of the site to the other tunnel. If our managers are anywhere else, they can connect through remote VPN with no problems.

    My question is if anyone knows of a way to make the firewall allow VPN site to site and remote connections with the same remote IP address.

    Hi John,.

    Basically, in older versions, when you hit a static encryption card and you does not match this static encryption completely map the connection continues until the dynamic encryption card. For this reason, you can connect your IPSec clients before. A bug has been opened on this vulnerability.

    CSCuc75090  Details of bug

    The crypto IPSec Security Association are created by dynamic crypto map to static peers

    Symptom:

    When a static VPN peer adds all traffic to the ACL crypto, a surveillance society is based even if the pair IP is not allowed in the acl to the main façade encryption. Are these SA finally put in correspondence and commissioning the dynamic crypto map instance.

    Conditions:

    It was a planned design since the first day that allowed customers to fall through in the case of static crypto map did not provide a necessary cryptographic services.

    The SA must be made from a peer configured statically and a dynamic crypto map instance must be configured on the receiving end.

    Workaround solution:

    N/A

    Some possible workarounds are:

    Configure a static nat device when you try to use the remote VPN if the firewall remotely will be hit with a different public IP address. It would be a good solution, but it will depend on how many ip addresses public you have available, if you really want one of these ip addresses for that access.

    Also, I thought you could use AnyConnect instead of the IPSec VPN client. I don't know how many users need to connect from your PC to the remote site, but the ASA has 2 licenses SSL available that you could use. Because Anyconnect uses the SSL protocol, it won't have a problem on your environment.

    Below some information:

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/asa_84_cli_config/vpn_anyconnect.html

    Hope this helps,

    Luis.

  • He would work to have 3.2 and 4.2 on the same server of db with different web servers?

    Hello

    I have three existing environments which are 11g and Apex 3.2 on Linux (Dev, Test, Prod). I have also three front-end web servers that are Windows 2003 with IIS for Apex (Dev, Test, Prod)

    We have three new Windows servers running 2008 we upgraded to.

    So, my question is on the upgrade of Apex to 4.2 at the same time. I would like to have the new Windows Server (Dev), and then point to the same server to Linux as my old Windows 2003 db. And it points to the same instance of db. My goal would be to achieve production with this configuration and then just do a redirect to URL on the old Windows 2003 server and that it points to the new Windows Server 2008. In this way, that I wouldn't need to move data from one instance to another.

    Would this work? I have installed 3.2 and 4.2 on the same instance of db? A 3.2 Windows Server and have a pointed Windows 4.2 server on the same back-end server?

    APEX lives on the database instance. Run you the APEX on the database upgrades. The short answer to what I think is your question is No.

    I don't know what is the relevant motivation?

  • IS the UUID and device ID is the same?

    Dear team,

    Ask you to help me with the following queries?

    Q1:-UUID and device Id is the same?

    Q2:-peripheral Id comes from storage array to a LUN?

    Q3:-is the UUID provided by an ESX Server, then this ESX Server to identify this LUN?

    Q4 :-UUID is also called or refers signature ESX?

    Concerning

    Mr. VMware.

    Hello

    in general, the signature should not change in a scenario you desrcibed.

    The ESX host allows you to create a data store VMFS on this LUN collects information provided by the table.

    This information will be used to generate a signature (the process itself is still not published by VMware).

    The signature itself is stored in the VMFS data store and is always used when the Renumeriser SCSI operations.

    Whenever an ESX Server perform a reboot or rescan operation, the following procedure will be used (high level).

    The ESX Server will

    • analyze the SCSI bus and collects information for SCSI on any device seen
    • Search for an existing partition table and the types of known partitions
    • for each VMFS data store found it will read the signature
    • checks if the signature matches with SCSI information
      • matches, continue to accumulate the VMFS datastore
      • does not, this VMFS datastore is not mounted automatically because it is identified as an "instant" feature

    So you could access easily other ESX servers on this device when each ESX Server does not see the device with the same SCSI information.

    As a best practice, each server ESX shoud see such device shared with the same LUN ID.

    The modern paintings are capable of presenting storage devices with different LUN ID in an initiator (HBA) basis.

    Another thing to keep in mind that ports in frontend used table use the same Port SCSI/flag settings, but these indicators may differ between vendors.

    If these two basic requirements are met, you will be able to share the easy storage device between multiple ESX servers.

    Kind regards

    Ralf

  • VM on the same host and vSwitch talk internally?

    VM on the same host, using the same vSwitch automatically talk to each other internally on the host when they need pass data without using the NETWORK interface card or is there something specific that needs to be configured to do?

    Thank you

    With the virtual machines on the same vSwitch network traffic will proceed on via virtual network cards so the interaction network will not differ from the VM to communicate to a physical host.  Network traffic between virtual machines (assuming that they are on the same VLAN) will stay in the vSwitch and not go through the physical network on the host layer.  Thus the inter-VM traffic can exceed the speed of the NIC port in the vSwitch.

    vSphere includes VM Communication Interface (VMCI) that allows a host to communicate with the virtual machines without going through the network layer.  You can also enable VMCI for VM VM communication.

    http://pubs.VMware.com/VMCI-SDK/

    http://KB.VMware.com/kb/1010806

    Dave

    VMware communities user moderator

    Now available - vSphere Quick Start Guide

    You have a system or a PCI with VMDirectPath?  Submit your specifications to Officieux VMDirectPath HCL.

  • Redirect to the same page with the values of the variables

    Hello

    I develop a form to report data of the certain date range provided by the user.

    The problem is that I have to redirect the page back to the original page with the error message "not found in the date range" If the provided date range contains all the data in the database. I am able to redirect the page to the original page for help:

    < cfif queryname. RecordCount EQ 0 >

    < cfset action 'error' = >

    < Cflocation >

    < / cfif >

    And I use the < cfparam > for the creation of an action to navigate in the code, variable

    < name cfparam = "action" default = "" >

    [Use the < cfparam > above, tag at the top of the code and using action EQ 'report' and ' ' for navigation in the code]

    But, when I redirect to the same page, with the variable value measures of error and using cflocation he forget all varable values in the new page [way], then how can I pass a variable value measures on the same page and redirect it to the same page on meeting certain criteria.

    If this isn't clear, let me know.

    Help, please

    Vijayvijay77.

    vijayvijay77 wrote:


    ...


    And I use

    a kind of cfif to navigate inside the code. I'm doing something wrong here.

    You say that you guessed it at work.  But you have a dangerous code here (if you have not changed).

    The line will generate variables URLS when ColdFusion processes the page.cfm file once requested by the browser.  For example url.set and url.flag.

    Tags are NOT specifying the scope of variables, so they will default to the scope of "variables".  Who are the local variables of the demand for treatment.  For example variables.set and variables.flag.

    URL.set and VARIABLES.set ARE NOT the same variables.  And this confusion can cause some VERY difficult to diagnose the problems of code.

Maybe you are looking for