PIX VPN local authentication client

Similar Questions

• Problem Cisco VPN Client with local authentication

  I configured PIX for the Cisco VPN client for remote access. It must be connected and also inside network is accessible. It is without any authentication username. It works well with a vpngroup name and the password for the vpngroup, configured on PIX and also on the Cisco VPN client. (version 4.6)

  When I configure crypto for local authentication, it did not work. configuration is as follows.

  #crypto card: name of the map of local authentication client

  I created a user with private = 15.

  Client VPN must be connected, and then it pops up a window user name and password. After giving these details. The user is not authenticated.

  Are there patterns more to do in / isakmp / ipsec / aaa configurations.

  Thank you

  AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol

  client authentication card crypto remote_vpn LOCAL

  client configuration address card crypto remote_vpn throw

  client configuration address card crypto remote_vpn answer

• 506th PIX IPSEC VPN allow authentication for local users?

  We have a 6.3 (5) running PIX 506th, configured for Cisco's VPN IPSEC clients. Cisco VPN clients authenticate with the credentials of group fine, but is it possible to use local users to authenicate plu? We use local users to our existing PPTP VPN clients, but we want to migrate these users to IPSEC. Any info would be greatly appreicated.

  Of course, you can... you need to include the command on your card crypto below

  map LOCAL crypto client authentication

  I hope this helps... Please, write it down if she does!

• Client pix VPN how to authenticate with Active Directory

  Hi all, I've just set up my first Client VPN on a Cisco PIX. Everything works very well so that hitting the correct subnet and logon. However, I would like to see how I can get my connection of remote users with there active directory accounts. Right now I use the local connection for the pix for testing purposes. Sounds easy, but I'm missing something

  We use:

  Cisco Pix 515E version 6.3 (3)

  Thank you

  Dan

  Unfortunately the PIX 6.3.3 version does not support Active Directory authentication. V6.3.3 PIX only supports authentication to the server database, radius, and Ganymede local PIX.

  If you want to authenticate to active directory, it is support for PIX v7.x go.

  Here are the different types of authentication support for PIX v7.x leave for your reference:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa70/configuration/guide/AAA.html

  Hope that answers your question.

• With PAT on Cisco PIX VPN client

  Dear all,

  I have a PIX 515 to the main site with the IPSec security is enabled. Homepage user using 3.x VPN client connects to the PIX for VPN access. When user Home use real IP, I can ping to the local network of the main site. However, when the Home user using a router with PAT, the VPN can be established.

  Is there a setting I should put on PIX, VPN client or router?

  Thank you.

  Doug

  And if you still have problems, upgrade your pix, 6.3 and usage:

  ISAKMP nat-traversal

  But the first thing would be to check the IPSEC passthrough as Ade suggested. If the device is a linksys check the version of the firmware as well.

  Kind regards

• WLC Flex connect local authentication does not work

  Hi guys,.

  I'll give you a brief description of our current flexconnect configuration. We have APs configured mode flexconnect in the remote office and in local mode in the local office. Wireless LANs are the same in both locations and we have detected a problem in one specific SSID. It is a voice SSID and configured in 802.1 x mode that authenticates to a RADIUS server in the remote desktop.

  We detected only when the WAN line gets collapsed the IP phones unplugged wireless SSID and when the WAN line become free, reconnected.

  We have seen that we can configure Flexconnect local auth mode to avoid this problem, but it of esn can't work properly. We have set up APs in remote site with an IP address static and configured as NAS in the RADIUS server, but we did not see any which authenticayion in th RADIUS server package when change us the SSID to «FlexConnect auth» local

  Can you give me an idea to help solve this problem?

  Thanks in advance.

  Joel

  I suppose that clients connected by access points Flexconnect have problems where the WAN connection is down (?)

  It depends on your current configuration and security policy what are the feasible options in this scenario. If there is an available RADIUS server - who can still authenticate your users while the WAN line is down, you can configure your access points to access this server directly. You must use a FlexConnect for this group and configure the external server on the general tab, in the menu "AAA". You already made the point of access-static IP addresses and add them as clients on the RADIUS server, then it should work.

  Another option is that in the event of failure, access points to will authenticate the client based on a local data base and/or certificate. Also, this requires a FlexConnect group and the option 'Enable local authentication AP'. For example: If you are using PEAP and a specific user for VoWLAN account you can download the server and the certificates of CA to the WLC and add the credentials of this account to build the same configuration with the external server. Downside of this is the lack of central logging that may not match your security policy.

  Remember that the access point itself can't remember the relationship between the access point and FlexConnect group, in both scenarios, you need to configure all controllers manually with these MAC to the Group mappings. This behavior is different in comparison with the "groups of AP" what access point you remember during the passage of the controllers.

  The "FlexConnect local authentication" option on the SSID itself forces always use local authentication that has been configured on the FlexConnect group even if the connection with the WLC is available. I don't think that it is feasible to use it in your scenario.

  Please rate helpful messages... :-)

• Simple PIX PIX VPN issues

  I'm trying to implement a simple PIX PIX VPN using the simple PIX - PIX VPN documentation for the sample config page. I have a lot of VPN tunnels with other very happy other PIX devices so it's quite annoying. Anyway, on the source PIX config is as follows:-

  access-list 101 permit ip 172.18.138.0 255.255.255.0 172.18.133.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 101 permit ip 172.18.133.0 255.255.255.0 172.18.138.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (phoenix_private) 0-access list 101

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

  No sysopt route dnat

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac chevelle

  ntlink 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map TransAm

  correspondence address 1 card crypto transam 101

  card crypto transam 1 set peer 172.18.126.233

  card crypto transam 1 transform-set chevelle

  interface inside crypto map transam

  ISAKMP allows inside

  ISAKMP key * address 172.18.126.233 netmask 255.255.255.255

  ISAKMP identity address

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 1

  of ISAKMP policy 1 encryption

  ISAKMP policy 1 md5 hash

  1 1 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP policy 1 lifetime 1000

  and if I generate the traffic logs show this: -.

  9 August 18:40:15 10.60.6.247% PIX-3-305005: no translation not found for icmp src phoenix_private:172.18.138.111 dst domestic group: 172.18.133.51 (type 8, code 0)

  9 August 18:40:17 10.60.6.247% PIX-3-305005: no translation not found for icmp src phoenix_private:172.18.138.111 dst domestic group: 172.18.133.51 (type 8, code 0)

  9 August 18:40:18 10.60.6.247% PIX-3-305005: no group of translation not found for udp src phoenix_private:172.18.138.111/3832 dst inside:172.18.133.51/53

  9 August 18:40:18 10.60.6.247% PIX-3-305005: no translation not found for icmp src phoenix_private:172.18.138.111 dst domestic group: 172.18.133.51 (type 8, code 0)

  9 August 18:40:19 10.60.6.247% PIX-3-305005: no group of translation not found for udp src phoenix_private:172.18.138.111/3832 dst inside:172.18.133.51/53

  No isakmp and ipsec debugging message appears, but you who wait that the PIX does not even link the traffic with the access list or a NAT.

  I do something obviously stupid, can someone tell me what it is, thank you.

  Jon.

  Hello

  1. you create a second access as list:

  outside_cryptomap ip 172.18.138.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 172.18.133.0 255.255.255.0

  and

  2. instead of

  correspondence address 1 card crypto transam 101

  You must configure

  card crypto transam 1 match address outside_cryptomap

  the problem is that you configure an ACL for nat and crypto - that does not work

  concerning

  Alex

• question links to site 2 site VPN with authentication cert

  Currently we are accumulate tunnel site-2-site VPN with our client. Usually we use pre-shared key as authentication with other customers without any problems, but it must use authentication cert with her this time. But the question is that our CA is different from theirs. I tried a few times, but he failed. Is it someone please let me know that he must have the certificate issued by the same certification authority to create the VPN tunnel?

  Thank you very much!

  Hello

  You can read this document to get a simple example of setting up a VPN S2S using certificates on an ASA:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080aa5be1.shtml

  Basically the sides must have the same certification authority and If there is an intermediate certificate that must be installed also. The ASA 2 will generate a CSR (certificate access code request), now then PKI will create a certificate for both parties, commonly called "certificate of identity".

  Please pass a note and mark as he corrected the post helpful!

  David Castro,

  Kind regards

• Can the NAT of ASA configuration for vpn local pool

  We have a group of tunnel remote ipsec, clients address pool use 172.18.33.0/24 which setup from command "ip local pool. The remote cliens must use full ipsec tunnel.

  Because of IP overlap or route number, we would like to NAT this local basin of 172.18.33.0 to 192.168.3.0 subnet when vpn users access certain servers or subnet via external interface of the ASA.  I have nat mapping address command from an interface to another interface of Armi. The pool local vpn is not behind any physical interface of the ASA. My question is can ASA policy NAT configuration for vpn local pool.  If so, how to set up this NAT.

  Thank you

  Haiying

  Elijah,

  NAT_VPNClients ip 172.18.33.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0

  public static 192.168.33.0 (external, outside) - NAT_VPNClients access list

  The above configuration will be NAT 172.18.33.0/24 to 192.168.33.0/24 when you go to 10.1.1.0/24 (assuming that 10.1.1.0/24 is your subnet of servers).

  To allow the ASA to redirect rewritten traffic the same interface in which he receive, you must also order:

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  Federico.

• The remote session was disconnected because the local computer client access license could not be upgraded or renewed on Windows xp

  Hello

  I have Windows server 2003 I have the server license terminal server, but one of my XP machine, which I'm calling his error remote desktop by giving as below
  The remote session was disconnected because the local computer client access license could not be upgraded or renewed on Windows xp.

  Thank you
  Deepak Labonté.

  Hello annelabonnote

  Thank you for visiting the Microsoft Answers site. The question you have posted is related to Windows Server 2003 and would be better suited to the Windows Server TechCenter community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will support what ask you:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/winservergen/threads

• On Pix VPN tunnel to the same subnet

  I have a customer who want to set up a the PIX VPN tunnel located on each site. For some reason, each side has the same subnet number, for example. 10.10.10.x/32. I'm sure we must run NAT, but is it possible.

  This can help

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800949f1.shtml

• question about MRSA and the local web client

  Hi, I need to know if is possible activate in Siebel 8.2.2.0 local web client module of the MRSA. I want to do this to read and analyze the statistics generated for this tool.
  
  Thank you

  I don't think that it is possible to use MRSA for local web client. You can try using the recording by Doc below of events

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E16348_01/books/RRAdm/reports9.html#wp1018257

  If you need the option sql coil use /s for short customer as described in the Doc ID 475564.1 on support.oracle.com:

  c:\siebel\bin\siebel.exe/c "c:\siebel\bin\siebel.cfg" / s "c:\temp\spool.sql".

  Thank you

  Wilson

• PIX VPN authentication

  I see options to authenticate users VPN on Radius, Ganymede +, local or using a VPN group. Is - this from there anyway to authenticate on a NT domain, Active Directory by Microsoft or Novell eDirectory directory service?

  Cannot find details in the configuration guide.

  Thank you

  Greg

  Hello Greg,.

  Thanks for your question. In fact, PIX is not built in API unlike VPN 3 K to send the authentication request directly to the devices you mentioned. PIX has the RADIUS / Ganymede + API and that is why its need to use an AAA server that supported Radius/Ganymede. AAA Cisco Secure Server can be integrated with all deviecs you mentioned. You can point your PIX to the Cisco Secure AAA server and he will forward the application to the database you mentioned in your post.

  I hope this helps. Kind regards

  Renault

• Termination of the client PIX VPN and Internet access from the same interface

  Hello

  VPN remote users connect to PIX (7.2) outside interface, but need to have these clients to access the Internet through the PIX outside interface as well. Need this because PIX IPs is registered and allowed access to some electronic libraries. One way would be to set up a proxy within the network and vpn users have access to the Internet through the proxy, but can it be done without proxy?

  Yes, public internet on a stick

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00805734ae.shtml

• 3.5.1 to 506th Pix VPN Client using IPsec over TCP

  Is it possible to do when there is a device in the path of the VPN tunnel that will make the static NAT?

  The reason is that the external interface of the Pix will have a private address, and it is the endpoint of the tunnel. The performance of NAT device has a public address, who thinks that the VPN client is the end of the tunnel, the static NAT will result the incoming packets on port UDP 500 for a destination of the Pix.

  Thank you.

  The Pix can not do TCP encapsulation. He can do UDP encapsulation.

  You can create IPSec tunnels to the external of the Pix even if address he addresses NATted provided that it is NOT of PAT and NAT.