Place images without loss of quality?

So when I download a high quality image and place it on top of the image I'm working on, it seems smaller and if I resize it, it loses the definition and I'm not able to work with it.

Any help?

When you place an image on an existing image, it will have on the properties of the existing file.  For example, if you have a 300ppi, 16-bit, ProPhoto RGB and place on 72 dpi, 8-bit, the sRGB file, it will have on the properties of the file 72 dpi.

I hope that makes sense.

-joe

Tags: Photoshop

Similar Questions

  • How vectorizes an image without loss of quality

    I'm trying to "Distort the free" the the eps image, HAVE, but it must be outlined first, I think.

    How I vectorizes an image without quality loss?

    As you can see here, this yellow image will distort free.

    dhl business shipping.png

    Considering that this image will not distort:

    collect plus business rates.png

    They are both the same file format, but as you can see one of the images has many elements, but the other does not. I have to convert the second picture?

    Thank you

    Simon

    Simon,

    If I (put) understand, you can cheat as follows (guides are your friends, telling you when you're withoin magnetism remotely):

    (1) ClickDrag with the Rectangle tool in the opposite corners of the placed image (Smart Guides say anchor);

    (2) give the rectangle nostroke/nofill;

    (3) group the rectangle and the image;

    (4) distort the as you like.

  • Import of images without loss of quality

    I have an image which is pretty high resolution and seems fine in Photoshop CS5.  However, whenever I try to paste it into Flash CS5, it loses quality and looks terrible.  If I try first save it as a different image format and then import it into Flash, the color changes.  Can someone help me understand how to prevent this? The original image is a .tif, there is only a limited number of formats can I convert it using Photoshop. Thank you.

    To resize an image in PS, resize before you save and do not use "Save for Web" to resize unless you want to decrease the quality.

    In the main menu, choose "Image" and then "Image size". Set your pixel dimensions and resolution in the pop-up dialog box. Choose 'Keep the Proportions' and 'Resampling' using bicubic.

    Typical screen resolution is 72 pixels per inch, while the printing resolution is 300 pixels per inch. So, if you save a 1000 x 500 px image and display it on a screen, it displays at about 13.9 x 6.9 inches but if you print this exact same image it will display at about 3.3 x 1.7 inches.

    Thus resize the image before check you in, then simply record as usual, giving the file a different name from the original (if you still have a high resolution version).

    Good luck!

    Adninjastrator

  • I could place an image in a document BCTI without loss of quality

    Could I place an image inside a BCTI document without loss of quality?

    Review:

    The only thing in this document is the proxy, not the entire chart.

    Bob

  • How to proper resize images and videos when running without loss of quality?

    Hi guys. I need a little help here.

    I built a flash site, in which I want to resize a movie to the scene. I do it by keeping the proportion, so I just resize the width and then I resize the consequence of the height to the width of new but keeping the proportion.

    The problem is that my film looks like he "pixeled".

    I found a site on which the stage is resized dynamically with the movie and the background images without any of their loss of quality. So far, I knew that resize pictures or videos in flash for the creation or the runtime environment produces results pixeled.

    This is the site: http://kampanjeweb.apt.no/jotun/romforrom/. Can someone tell me how they do without quality loss? Just make the browser in windowed mode and resize the margins to see the effect.

    Thank you.

    Hello, Venian.

    On the video, you can try setting the smoothing of the flash.media.Video on TRUE property. This should keep a quality, but you can do nothing if the video has a bad quality. You need a great video.

    On the images, you you need to redraw the image whenever you resize. To achieve this, use a combination of Bitmap, BitmapData and Matrix classes. No doubt, just call again. Here's a simple example:

    var scale:Number = .5;
    var highQualitySourceImage:Bitmap = ...your image...;
    var scaleMatrix:Matrix = new Matrix();
         scaleMatrix.scale(scale, scale);
    
    var bitmapData:BitmapData = new BitmapData( scale*highQualitySourceImage.width, scale*highQualitySourceImage.height);
         bitmapData.draw(highQualitySourceImage, scaleMatrix);
    
    var finalBitmap:Bitmap = new Bitmap(bitmapData);
    
    addChild( finalBitmap );
    

    See you soon,.

    CaioToOn!

  • Keep small size without loss of quality over far during re-registration edited JPG

    Hi all

    I have a bunch of pictures of a photographer I need to put a credit. They are all very light (~ 50 k) as they have been saved with JPG compression to only about 900 x 600px.

    My problem is that when I run the action to add the credit, the file is saved as a JPG file but the only way to achieve a similar weight is to set the compression level 2, resulting in a massive loss of quality. With a quality to 12 files increase around 200 k! Is it possible that I can keep the size of the original (or similar) file even if I am actually starting with a new image by editing? The photo credit is added on the edge, not bunk.

    Thank you

    Carpet

    Hi mast

    50 KB for a 900 x 600 pixels image is on the small side and suggests either a high-compression JPG or even save for Web has been used before they came for you.  200 KB is a file size reasonable for a good quality JPG of this size.  It's one of those situations "it is what it is."   Degree of activity are the images?  I'm guessing that you realize that images of high frequency with a lot of details and small blocks of different color, will not compress nearly as well as something like a little bird in a blue sky, so the specific images, you work on will of course affect the size of the file.

    You can get the original files in an uncompressed format?

    The file size is critical?  that is, this is for the use of the web, or what?

    At the present stage, there is no solution that will maintain the quality and the size of the file.

  • Full screen without loss of quality of the graphics

    Hello

    I often use 1000 * 700 pixels for my project (users must use 1024 * 768 or higher resolution in windows)

    but many times, they ask me to add full-screen function (position) and the problem is after full screen I have loss of quality in all the images and graphics that I used

    and my project to bracts dependes the monitor resolution, and it will be very ugly, especially when they have widescreen 22 inch.

    How can I avoid losing quality and force them to keep the properties compel more broadly (perhaps static background cover area)

    Thank you

    Your images should be sized for the maximum resolution that they can meet and should have the smoothing option so that they can adapt to the resolutions smller.

  • How to make shift/pushed images without lossing its function of code?

    Hello! Thank you for reading this issue.

    I'm a begginner somewhat like in the creation of a Web site.

    Currently, I am tring to make a website, a Web site that he must constantly update new pictures without deleting them (maybe later).

    Currently I have a gallery that is made using "TABLES" in dreamweaver cs3, the galleries look like (VERY SIMILAR) http://www.papayaclothing.com/shop/goods_list_v1.php?Index=newarrivals & m=

    As you can see there are 4 images defined in a 'specified square' with descriptions and related.

    But the question is... whenever I have a new image that is ready to be inserted I want to "push / SHIFT DOWN" does not remove the previous photo in the new table, without lossing his code works as in linked pages / etc.

    Will be in pictures of old and put new updated again to the old

    This process will be cordoned off constantly, whenever I have a new available photo.

    How can I do this? is their a 'special' code that allows me to do this or do I have to take it seriously "menually" 1 by 1?

    I tried Googling and could not fine the answer

    Help on this is much appreciated, thank you in advance.

    I prefer layouts CSS (resize viewport to see how it works)

    http://ALT-Web.com/templates/CSS-semi-Liq-photo-sheet.shtml

    Tables is difficult because you need to insert an extra line at the top. And if you don't have enough pictures to fill the line, it seems uneven.

    CSS allows you to insert 1, 2 or 3 new images and right beside or underneath gracefully glides.

    Hope this helps,

    Nancy O.
    ALT-Web Design & Publishing
    Web | Graphics | Print | Media specialists
    http://ALT-Web.com/
    http://Twitter.com/ALTWEB

  • export of sequences of images without loss...

    Hello

    I have some footage of TIFFs that I want to export that video. Parameter, which is the best to make them without loss?

    Uh, making them Lossless (AVI)? Don't know what you hope to hear. There is no universal formula for perfect video. Depends on what it is to be used, what resolution is etc... The common consensus for intermediate workflows is to use formats visually lossless, which in the case of sequences of images PS as PSD, TIFF, TGA etc or Quicktime movies using the PNG animation compression or qualify better, for something else 'no loss' is just an empty word of sense, as almost all webcast formats DVD or broadcast involve compression any. In any case, if the latter is of no relevance in this case, you use the wrong tool using Photoshop. so if please specify what exactly you plan to do, and we can help you find a solution.

    Mylenium

  • How to export to gif animated without loss of quality bitmap image

    Hello

    I'm having a devil of a time to export from a fla file, I created a backup gif banner. Seemed easy enough to select export > gif animated, but the quality of

    the small image is terrible, and the size of the file has quadrupled. Any help?

    Which doesn't look too bad considering that you create a gif file.  Do you realize that the gif images can contain only 256 colors?  You need to check the number of colors, use your images before they were converted - probably thousands and thousands.  You could try to create images like gifs first and see if that helps, although it is possible that you get an immediate loss of the quality of the image.

  • Cut a file .mov without loss of quality on the iPod touch

    Hello

    I have a new iPod touch 64 GB with many clips of film (long).

    Soon, I'll run out of space!

    How can I adjust the .mov files (which are too long) on the iPod

    without quality loss?

    Do I need a special app for this?

    Thank you.

    You should be able to do it directly from the camera without a third-party application. See http://www.betterhostreview.com/cut-videos-camera-roll-iphone.html for an example. Personally, I would backup the originals to a computer first.

    TT2

  • As a general rule for video compression without loss of quality?

    I noticed on iTunes for example I can download a full movie of 1080 p that looks great, and it won't be like 3 or 4 GB, sometimes less. But I've got 15 minutes videos that are much more than that.

    I want to compress a video and then store it in my videos on my computer folder. But they are still huge and I'm still too afraid to go too low because I have no idea how saying how much it will affect quality.

    Is there a general rule? Perhaps a way to divide the size of the original file? If the initial project is say 40 GB, which is not a lot compared to Hollywood movies, I'm sure that there are thousands of GB. How to make it down to 3 or 4 GB and it look fine?

    I'm talking about the videos that I'm done, I'm not going to change again once, etc. I know how to export just in case I need to go back.

    There is only one "rule" when it comes to compression without quality loss - files will be huge.

    Now, if we change this scenario a bit to say "without significant quality loss", the situation becomes more complex.  Different people notice different things, and there are a LOT of variables that go into the encoding.  There is no simple guide for this.  My advice would be either learn about compression, or simply you don't have to worry about the size so.

    Hard drives are cheap.  Download more when you need it.

  • Reducing size of image without loss of resolution

    I create marketing materials and product labels for my business using the Elements 9. I'm not a Photoshop expert, but I have a reasonable knowledge of the program. I need to resize certain assets such as logos and paste them on various documents. The problem I have is that no matter what method to use to resize, they always lose resolution and appear pixelated and/or printed blurry in the final version.

    Normally I get assets in an image high resolution. It could be a file jpeg or bitmap or any other number format. I will open up in the elements, select and delete the background through the magic wand > layer by cut and remove the background layer.

    From there, I tried the ranging from the simple select, enter the corner and manually drag method to inside, using Image > resize > Image size and filling in the fields. When I did this, I typed in 300 dpi, made sure maintain Proportions was turned on, checked resample and selected bicubic net and enter the size in inches. Then I paste in the document, and it looks fine. I save, which normally opens Reader and print it from there. The printed image looks great with the exception of all the logos I've resized, which looked terrible. I also tried printing from elements, but he won't do it without giving me a message saying, first, that the document will print less than 200 dpi, which is obviously not desirable.

    One I paste the image on the document, the size of the Image > resize becomes unusable because I can't seem to select just the logo - even with the bounding box clearly visible around the logo, resizing causes the entire document to be affected.

    I tried many combinations of selection/unselection of all the options that I can find, including the Alias/Anti-Alias (who for some reason any sometimes seems selectable at all). I scoured forums and tutorials to help with that and have tried all the methods that I found. In the end, nothing has worked. There must be a way to do it. Our 30 day trial is nearly over and we went ahead and bought the program without knowing if we could solve this problem - if we do not, it will be pretty useless for us. Please help me if I can tell my boss that there not just wasting money from the company on this program!

    In short, my question is, what is the correct (or best) method to reduce the size of the image? Please be detailed - and thank you!

    Also try saving your items that cut you on something like a psd

    (do not resize before saving it), then using file > place to the

    objects in your document to another.

    This turns things into smart objects, which can give better results during the measurement with

    the move tool or Image > transform > free transform. (Ctrl + T)

    MTSTUNER

    Post edited by: MTSTUNER

  • How to change the format of VOB file without loss of quality and file size of balloon?

    I try to save a VOB file on a problematic DVD using first Pro CC 2015. Can anyone help me please with selecting the best export settings?

    My goal is to maintain the quality and size of the file as close to the original as possible. I just need to change the file format to something I can easily view on my computer. Sometimes, he tries to simply change the extension from VOB to MPEG, but in this case, I edited (shortened) the original file so need to save again.

    Most of the output options I tried drastically reduce quality or seriously enlarge the size of output file.

    First gives me the following information from the source:

    Type: MPEG Movie

    File size: 675,20 MB

    Image size: 360 x 288

    Frame rate: 25.00

    Audio Format: 48000 Hz - compressed - stereo

    Project Audio Format: 48000 Hz - 32 bit floating point - stereo

    Total time: 00:59:22:02

    Format of the pixels: 1.0940

    AVI, quality 100 gives a file size of 12 GB. Source H.264 match - high bitrate gives a file size of 2 GB. Where does all that extra data?

    Match sequence settings should be an obvious solution, but it gives me a slightly larger file (706,98 MB) with a sharp drop in quality.

    If I select H.264, corresponds to the size of the original image and approach the source of all other settings as I can, the size of the resulting file is still much greater than if I drop the transmission speed. However, first does not show me bitrate of the source until I put it to maintain the same quality?

    I want just the same file in a different format so that I can view them easily. Simple yet I have not been able to find a solution. Can someone point me in the right direction?

    Thank you very much, Berne

    You can not avoid re-encoding. His first mpeg will not give you made smart on mpeg.

    You need a different program if al you want to do is trim down.

    Best Software MPEG video editor | TMPGEnc MPEG Converter Smart 4

    Match sequence settings does exactly what it says. Your sequence (each) works with a codec to preview.

  • Try to change an AVI file without loss of quality

    I am trying to add music and graphics to existing video AVI.  The problem is that no matter what I do I lose quality when I put them in first pro video.  The original file is not the greatest, but there is a noticeable difference to play in windows media player and consultation first and after export.

    Help?

    AVI video information:

    The size is 264,35 M bytes (medium frame = 117,18 K bytes)

    There is 2310 keyframes.

    Frame rate is 29.970 fps

    Image size is 720 x 480

    The depth is 24 bits.

    Thanks, that explains a lot. Your source video is SD standard definition 720 x 480. However, the sequence is "HD anamorphic" at 1280 x 1080, with 1.5 Pixel Aspect Ratio. If the source is by the wind towards the high and stretched and converted from interlaced to progressive!

    You want the sequence to match the Source. Right-click on a clip in the project bin and select 'New sequence of the Clip' or drag a clip on the button new item, just to the left of the Trash Can be will create a new sequence to correctly match the clip video source.

    Then export, you also want the dimensioning of 720 x 480 for best results. I do not recommend the "Source of game". Understand what you want to export (Web, camera, DVD?) and choose a preset that is appropriate. Please tell us, what do you do with the exported video? Who will decide what formats are suitable for export.

    Thank you

    Jeff Pulera

    Safe Harbor computers

Maybe you are looking for