Place looks washed out compared to the original in Photoshop TIFF

Similar Questions

• HP w2338h HDMI seems washed out compared to VGA.

  The w2338h myHP when using HDMI, the colors look washed out and show levels of black poor compared to the use of VGA.

  I found a solution! I don't know what you have to do in the ATI drivers, but I guess that there is a similar option buried.

  The NVIDIA Control Panel, go to "Desktop color Adjust settings" under "view". From there, the "Digital color Format" change RGB to YCbCr444 and voila, your color and black level problems are fixed!

• washed out background on the Treo Pro image

  Hello:

  When I put my background image on my today screen (check box in the settings, navigate to the image - use the 320 x 320 resolution) I get a "washed out" version of the image, regardless of its original color, your or its intensity. Images of the pre-installed themes are fine - dynamic and clear - but setting user images are very light (a bit like a transparency of 50% in Photoshop, for example). I tried the two format .jpg and .png. Backlight settings are not cure it either.

  Any ideas?

  Thank you.

  Hmm... I somehow missed your last post, sorry. I'm happy that you found the settings in Explorer photos and videos, I should have been more clear.
  In any case if this solves your problem please mark as the solution, this way people who use the Treo Pro can display the solution.

• When I use the function "cut", the line of results more sharpness compared to the original files. For example, {A: "file.psd"-> cultures 4x6inch, 300 dpi-> B: "cropped file.psd} then the results are as described as a first step. What s the problem.

  When I use the function "cut", the line of results more sharpness compared to the original files. For example, {A: "file.psd"-> cultures 4x6inch, 300 dpi-> B: "cropped file.psd} then the results are as described as a first step. What s the problem. (Photoshop CC, windows7)

  I'm a Retoucher of photpfile have used the CS2 version for many years, and fuction 'Harvest' is an important and frequent tree tools myself. The result of the broke lines drive me annoying cause my feeling touch Sofete are all blown away. Please help me.

  I think you're talking about using the crop tool? If you're cropping with a size and resolution that involves interpolation of the image, the crop tool will use your preference for the Interpolation of the Image. By default, bicubic is automatic, which can easily result in a sharp file. Change your preference (in general) to bicubic and you shouldn't see any sharpening.

  I hope it works for your situation.

• Images Photoshop look washed out in the first

  Some of my photos from Photoshop CC 2015 (and bridge) established first as psd files (and some jpg) appear washed out and less than the original. Many times they are not, however. I tried 'Original Edition or retouching in Photoshop' first, but that doesn't help - the Photoshop and Bridge image simply looks different from the first a. I need first look the same good Photoshop image edited.

  One point: I have worked in Photoshop CC 2015 (subscription of $9.99 / month Photographers') but in Premiere Pro 5.5. When this issue came up, I started a trial of first Pro CC version, and the problem persists.

  Help, please.

  KDOC

  Thank you very much for the offer. While I was waiting I kept trying this or that. I think it is now resolved: If you're doing a "save under", instead of a backup and then uncheck the box "ICC profile: Adobe RGB 1998", the changes made in Photoshop and then reflected in first. " I have not yet seen of workaround still works, but hope.

  If I'm going to continue to work in PrP5.5 or go to PrPCC is always open. 5.5 works faster for me because I have to recognize my card Nvidia 260 (minor hack), and the Mercury engine is effect. I can't get the PRP to do, and will have either a hack or a new video card. All the suggestions of the hack or an affordable card?

  Thanks for responding.

  KDOC

• Text looks washed out when I launch Firefox or return to the home page.

  When I start Firefox, the text on my home page looks like it is washed out or as when a printer is out of black ink and print only the color. If I update then everything is normal. I found that it only does so with Firefox. IE and Chrome are ok. I tried safe mode and removed my extensions one at a time, and she always does.

  Try turning off hardware acceleration:

  Try disabling graphics hardware acceleration. As this feature has been added to Firefox, it has gradually improved, but there are still some problems.

  You will have to perhaps restart Firefox for it to take effect, so save any work first (e.g. you compose mail, documents online that you are editing, etc.).

  Then perform the following steps:

  • Click on the orange top left Firefox button, then select the 'Options' button, or, if there is no Firefox button at the top, go to tools > Options.
  • In the Firefox options window, click the Advanced tab, and then select 'General '.
  • You will find in the list of parameters, the checkbox use hardware acceleration when available . Clear this check box.
  • Now restart Firefox and see if the problems persist.

  In addition, please check the updates for your graphics driver by following the steps in the following knowledge base articles:

  • Troubleshoot extensions, themes, and issues of hardware acceleration to resolve common problems of Firefox
  • Update your graphics drivers to use hardware acceleration and WebGL

  Also:

  • Update your graphics drivers to use hardware acceleration and WebGL
  • Recent history of claire
  • Check plugins
  • Create a screenshot of the problem

• picture looks washed out on save?

  Hello

  My question is about photoshop elements, but I thought that people who know what they are talking about would be in this forum, I hope this isn't a problem.

  When I open a (high resolution JPG) photo in photoshop (elements), it looks great. Then when I use 'save for web' the resulting jpg (or PNG) colors has all sort of washed out looking. What looks like a professional shot (which is actually a professional shooting) suddenly appears less pro.

  What is the cause, and can I do about it? It is not the "quality" of JPG, it is the problem, because same full quality does the same thing.

  And then part 2 to my question: when I download on myspace, it seems even MORE washed out. If I have all three photos is displayed on my screen (original, cropped in photoshop, myspace) the difference is obvious. Of course this second issue is not strictly a matter of photoshop.

  Any thoughts?

  Thank you

  mast

  PS. OSX 10.5.6 PES 6

  The problem is that your screen has a smaller range than sRGB. So when you preview the image in a browser that is unmanaged, you see without compensation of color that appears faded. Do you see a difference between Safari and Myspace because Myspace is stripping the image sRGB profile, so then your browser returns without compensation of color and you get the washed look.

  To relax. You see all of the images in this way. Open any web image with no profile embedded in PS, assign sRGB and you will see the art as the artist intended, for the first time. You cannot stop people to view your photos in this way. Your best bet is to make sure you're conversion / work in sRGB which is the 'norm' of the web.

  If the image is really important, you can tag with the small (~ 4 k) managed profile sRGB so those with Safari and other browsers will see the color that you intend. But thanks to Myspace and Facebook, you're ground do not worry. Is no longer everyone.

  And don't forget, each piece of art you have ever seen on the web stink just like what you see now, and you have never noticed before.

• Video edited GOPRO is "zoomed" compared to the original film cam; CS6 body

  I'm editing only GOPRO footage in PPr CS6. The edited video is "zoomed" ~ 2-3 x from the original sequence of cam.  WHAT's UP W/QUE? A checkbox somewhere? What should I do to change this and have exactly the same appearance as the original cam sequences?  I hope it's understandable. TIA.

  Hi Dearborn1,

  You are welcome, but we will make sure you are 100%. HDV refers to a budgeting on the tapes that HD "anamorphosée" of documents, which is so not 'full' HD, which is 1920 x 1080, 1440 x 1080. Don't know what record mode you are, I think you will have the options of the HD 1080 or 720, but you may be better off with a predefined "AVCHD" which corresponds to the form of footage (perhaps you meant HDV 720 p? Not used by a lot of cameras).

  You CAN put the clips of 1920 x 1080 HDV project and they look very good, but you lose some resolution in this way. In fact, you can put 1080 clips in a project of 720 p and it still works, but ideally, you want the best match for the source, and then you always can downconvert exit final for web DVD, etc. What is the format of the exact source, the instance as "1080 p 30"?

  Thank you

  Jeff

• I'm looking for on what was the original intel cpu in my recently bought elitebook 8560p

  I bought an EliteBook 8560p opportunity. How can I know what was the original intel i5. I think that it has been replaced with an i5 2540

  Guides Maintenance & Service-although it does not have the original processor in your model, it gives the different options.

  http://h20566.www2.hp.com/portal/site/hpsc/template.PAGE/public/psi/manualsResults/?sp4ts.oid=5056949&spf_p.tpst=psiContentResults&spf_p.prp_psiContentResults=wsrp-navigationalState%3Daction%253Dmanualslist%257Ccontentid%253DService-and-maintenance%257Clang%253Den&javax.portlet.begCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken&javax.portlet.endCacheTok=com.vignette.cachetoken

• My photo slide show came out different than the original slideshow in Chrome and Firefox

  My main slideshow output differently Muse for Chrome/Firefox, but it seems OK in Safari. Uploaded images are those used in the screenshot of the Safari, but for some reason any that a green tint comes in addition to the presentation of Chrome/Firefox. How can I get rid of this?

  <-this is the Version of Chrome

  <-safari version

  Help, please!

  Can not say with certainty without the URL of the page, but the first thing I would check is that the color profile for the original JPG is sRGB.

• Lightroom displays files and exports darker than the original or Photoshop files

  Hi all.

  Let me first preface this by saying I'm not technical interest, and I know nothing (or very little) of CHF etc. profiles.

  But suppose a person will try to tell me to do something with them in a really technical way that I don't understand, please treat me like a child of 4 years in this regard.

  I use Lightroom 5.6 on a Mac under 10.9.4 I Photoshop CS6 and fitted with a calibration Spyder 3pro device and all the Adobe programs linked to the exit of calibration to ensure 'if all is well' quality control.

  I recently was analog film scanning and this import in Lightroom 5. I noticed that the file import always seems darker than the original.

  When I exported from Lightroom, them they look like shit.

  There were no imports of additional parameters because they are all extinct. I did when I installed LR.

  I also noticed that whenever I imported a Raw file for some reason, on the original file would look great for a second then when clicked would change to something less attractive. But I digress.

  So try to show what's happening. I created some images to illustrate my problem.

  Also, it doesn't matter if I turn the proofing or disable.

  Lightroom Softproof on

  

  Lightroom Softproof off

  

  Vs Lightroom Photoshop histogram - very similar

  

  Left: file opened from Lightroom as the Original right: original Photoshop file

  

  Left: file open an export from Lightroom right: original Photoshop file

  

  Clues because it is very annoying and yet 5 Lightroom unusable.

  These files are probably in grayscale without an included icc profile. Photoshop, using the parameters that show you will pay 15% dot gain profile. Lightroom assumes the sRGB which is much more mixed. You can see this difference in the massively different histograms. What you need to do is save the file from Photoshop with included icc profile. Lightroom should display the same.

  Note a bug of color management nasty exist in Lightroom on Mavericks in the Panel to develop: Jao photo blog: quantification of the problem of management of the Mavericks color also which make the deep shadows Cap upward.

• With the help of 'Modify the Original' on a tiff file PS creates still another copy in Lightroom - is this normal?

  Hello

  Just tackle LR - round-trip PS and I'm a bit confused so thought I'd check here.

  What we want in LR is more of a raw file simple tiff file edited in PS - and if we open the tiff already edited in PS again, the file is replaced just when PS saves.

  Looking at the descriptions/options when we're going to edit already edited tiff, 'Edit the Original' looks like this will be repeated, but instead, we are left with two TIFF edited in Lightroom - does that mean that every tweak in the PS will result in another file in LR?

  Pointers would be much appreciated.

  See you soon

  Actually, for once that we certainly had edited TIFF two in LR - but after the back and forth a few times, we now see a PS edited tiff in the library - maybe the film took a few minutes to update?

• My documents pages look washed out and I can't open them.

  My documents on pages are not open.  They all look faded.

  A document icon faded in the Pages file picker is not a document Pages, but most likely a PDF document, which can not open Pages.

• My word balloons have a look "washed out" to them (photoshop 6.0)

  I have only the most basic need for my comic book scanned in but when I add a word I: ball

  #1. in the toolbar, select the elliptical tool Marqueee
  #2. Make a circle for the ball (in the points)
  # 3. hold down SHIFT to position my pointer to the funnel or the arrow until Word balloon for the character who speaks
  #4. Go to EDITION > RACE > choose black color > press SELECT

  However, after you have selected the black line to make the speech balloon, it is very cloudy, foggy and faded looking. Is there a setting I'm missing? Don't forget my program is version 6.0 - don't laugh, it works for me! Thank you

  Oh, Yes.  I don't remember all the way back to version 6.0, but I guess it works about the same way as the modern versions.  Without seeing a full screenshot of your work space, I'll guess that you have a feather on the elliptical tool.

• Print to a file THAT JPEG seems washed out

  Hello

  I recently exported a JPEG file from the print for the first time module so I could get it printed at a photo lab. I was surprised to see that the file looked rather washed out/under saturated the original did in Lightroom. I have a lot of experience in exporting to the web and I am aware on color spaces and how sRGB is better for web and printing of photo lab. As far I can tell my print settings from the file are accurate.

  My best guess is that the rendering intent option changes the color of a little jpeg? I left the perceptive value option. The rendering intent option cause colors seem less saturated in a print to JPEG file? If this is the case, then I guess the photo lab should compensate for that when I go to print?

  Ah. This seems to be another manifestation of the export module bug rather weird print. Many people have now seen elsewhere on the forum and you submit a bug report. It is only on versions of windows from Lightroom AFAICT. What seems to happen, is that Lightroom renders the image in the display profile, and then click profile assigns the sRGB (or other) to export. Your observation that it is more or less correct when you use adobeRGB makes me think that you probably have a display wide gamut. You can check if you have the bug by assigning the display profile in Photoshop to export. There should be no involvement of the profile screen any export from the print module, but somehow it happens. Clearly a bad bug. Fortunately I've ever met, but he'd bum majorly because it's a showstopper. The only solution I've heard of is to temporarily assign sRGB on the screen, make your export and place your calibrated monitor profile.

  Using LR 2.6?