Political food ISE of Cisco

Similar Questions

• Question of ISE CWA Cisco

  Nice day

  I have 1.2 ISE Cisco with Cisco 2960 n.

  I set up the authorization of the employee successfully, but my problem is with the users of comments that the link is not redirected.

  Please let know us what I put in the default authentication policy rule? deny access?

  And on the switch, I should put the prompt to connect to specific ports or I have to configure the VLAN specific authorization profile?

  Appreciate your support,

  In your authorization policy, you give your guest Wired the same result as Wired-Webauth.

  First time through you don't know he is invited so that it hits Wired-Webauth and gets redirected. Second time you need him in comments feed, so that you know that he is a guest authenticated, it hits Wired-Guest, but you send the same permissions 'Web_Auth '. Create a profile that you want to offer your guests authenticated - Guest_Allowed for example.

• Problem of generation of ISE CSR Cisco with wildcard certificate.

  We buy the Wildcard SSL certificate to be used in Cisco ISE but when I enter the following attributes given by the seller, I have this error.

  « *. domain.com is not a valid generic name. The attributes that I created in the CSR as follows:

  CN = *. domain.com

  SAN

  DNS name: ise.domain.com

  The above parameters is given by the seller. They said I should put this attribute because the certification authority (DigiCert), accepts that this certificate wildcard question format.

  The seller rejected my previous CSR I created successfully with the following attributes below. This is based on the Cisco Documentation.

  CN = ISE.domain.com

  SAN

  DNS name: ise.domain.com

  DNS name: *. domain.com

  I just want to confirm if the attribute given by the seller are valid for the Cisco ISE generate the CSR. Or to use the valid FQDN in the entrances to CN and not the generic name. And use the generic name in the name SAN DNS entry.

  Please advice. Appreciate the prompt respose of the expert.

  Thank you.

  Kind regards

  Mike

  Mike,

  A wildcard cert is definitely the way to go in a distributed environment.  Use the host name the node of your Admin got into the CN field:

  CN = ise, OR = domain, OU = com

  then enter the SAN field as asown above the CSR.

  Please rate useful messages and mark this question as answered if, in fact, does that answer your question.  Otherwise, feel free to post additional questions.

  Charles Moreton

• ISE of Cisco protocols for ldap and Windows wireless client

  Only protocols below are supported by ise in combination with ldap identity sources.

  EAP - GTC, PAP, EAP - TLS, PEAP-TLS.

  Peripheral Mac OS appear to be able to use these, but Windows users seem to have problems. How windows users must connect with ise that only uses the ldap Protocol?

  You can use the anyconnect Network Access Manager. Just out of curiosity why ldap on join ise to AD?

  Sent by Cisco Support technique Android app

• Unable to send accounting messages to the format of the RADIUS protocol to fortigate RSSO ISE of Cisco

  Hello

  I am working to get my shipment of Cisco ISE of Fortigate RSSO accounting messages (simple RADIUS sign) to work on the Fortigate firewall. I tried to add the Fortigate for logging targets at a distance and added the Fortigate under the categories of logging (accounting & Radius Accounting). In doing so, I ran a wireshark capture and found that the ISE send accounting messages to Fortigate in SYSLOG format. I need ISE to send the accounting information in the format RADIUS for RSSO to work on Fortigate firewall.

  I already had this work using Windows server (NPS) radius. So based on what I did in Windows I tried to reproduce the same thing to the ISE. I added Fortigate as external Radius server. I added the sequence Radius Server with Radius attribute as a class and I have a key in a custom for her string. I've also matched in the same attribute to Fortigate. And then selecting "use Proxy Service", I added an authentication strategy (uses the Radius Server sequence I created) instead of "Licensed protocols".» I brought this policy upwards.

  Then, I created a permission for the same policy. In the results of the authorization profile--> authorization policy, I added the attribute class. But every time that I add here, after registration, the attribute class is sitting next to the ASA VPN.

  Please confirm if my settings are ok or y at - it another way to get send ISE accounting messages in the form of RADIUS to Fortigate.

  PS: I only need to pass newspapers accounting and no need to send the authentication requests. There was an option to the Windows radius server where I could specify that authentication should happen on the radius of Windows and send accounting information to the remote radius server group.

  Any help with this is appreciated.

  Best regards

  SSK

  I am facing the same problem to send Radius accounting information to a Web proxy to perform filtering of content / granularity. Does anyone have any news about this? Maybe a Cisco support person.

  Rgds,

  Vanderlei

• iOS 8.0 our apple and ISE of CISCO [RESOLVED] custom portal users

  Hi guys,.
  I was wondering why after updating to iOS 8.0 our apple users, cannot
  go to the online portal ISE, we do em to connect via a WLC wich
  redirects web-auth, to ISE (radius server) process

  So what if we use the internal portal (Note2) wlc 5508 process all right
  After the update to 8.0 apple IOS devices cannot reach our custom portal
  None...

  everyone has experienced the same?

  BR

  Eugenio

  Glad that you got this work and good work on the search for a solution to your problem (+ 5 from me). Also, thank you for taking the time to come back and share it.

  If your problem is resolved, you must mark the thread as "Answered" :)

  One thing to consider too is CWA (Central Web Auth) instead of what you are doing is LWA (Local Web Auth). It's always better to CWA, there are many benefits to it.

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Cisco vWLC and issue of ISE Central Web Authetication

  Hello!

  I have a problem with a central Web authentication wireless. CWA woking fine wired.

  My APs woking FlexConnect mode with local switching. When I connect to the WLAN with CWA, web page with the portal asked to not open, but I see, this redirection works...

  When I try to ping ISE and have an odd result:

  [email protected]/ * /: ~ $ ping 10.10.2.47

  PING 10.10.2.47 (10.10.2.47) 56 (84) bytes of data.

  64 bytes from 10.10.2.47: icmp_seq = 5 ttl = 63 times = 1.45 ms

  64 bytes from 10.10.2.47: icmp_seq = 8 ttl = 63 times = 2.22 ms

  64 bytes from 10.10.2.47: icmp_seq = 10 ttl = 63 times = 1.43 ms

  ^ C

  -10.10.2.47 - ping statistics

  21 packets transmitted, received 3, 85% packet loss, time 20106ms

  RTT min/avg/max/leg = 1.430/1.703/2.223/0.367 ms

  When I change the WIFI open network security or any other method, ping to ISE work very well. Help, please!

  Web Auth (CWA) Centre works different controllers/APs works in mode FlexConnect. Please consult this guide and check if you have a similar setup.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/identity-Services-engine/116087-configure-CWA-WLC-ISE-00.html

  If so, please post screenshots with your configs (ACL redirect, political in ISE and WLC SSD settings).

  In addition, the version of the code you run in your controller and ISE.

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Cisco ISE 1.1.1 with Windows posturing

  Hello

  We tired for configured windows posturing here's the scenario

  We saw five ise boxes 3315 with version 1.1.1 off them 2 is admin, 2 is PS and 1 MNT

  and we have local Symantec and WSUS Server.

  We make posturing for Windows where I have a few questions

  (1) is there an integration here of the local WSUS server with Cisco ISE where Cisco ISE can automatically take all the mandatory WSUS update according to the crititcality of the WSUS server.

  (2) what is advised to set up the strategy of the Posture of the posture of windows in Cisco ISE and if manually configure windows political posture using specific KB and if there is an update available on Microsoft will we be able to configure the policy for the new update.

  (3) we have configured authentication dot1x in cisco ise and asked as well as on switch port where once the user must be connected to dot1x port of the switch it invites username and password dot1x and therefore, authorization policy, it gives vlan appropriate dynamics.

  But what are the ways where we can restrict the machine which is rather than the assets of the company and even if the user's user name and password in short any employee aware how we can restrict the user making the machine rather than the assets of the company?

  (4) can configure US policy posture for antivirus which will keep us in normal mode and at the same time, we can put posturing for windows which monioring mode which only monitor policy posture and reflected in the monitoring, log in which does not restrict the network for windows posturing

  That will be great if any one can please help me to get the issues

  Thank you

  Pranav

  What follows is under the POLICY-OF ELEMENTS of STRATEGY-POSTURE-> REQUIREMENTS > >

  

  What follows is located under

  POLICY OF-> ELEMENTS OF STRATEGY-> POSTURE->

  REPAIR-> WINDOWS SERVER UPDATE SERVICES REMEDIATION ACTIONS

  

  What follows is part POLICY-> POSTURE

  

  These settings work ALMOST flawlessly for me by forcing her we approved on our WSUS server for our group of workstations updated (all of our laptops are members of the) which meet the criteria of severity EXPRESS (critical and Important). Now, what I've discovered in the last few days is that... MS seems a bit random in their identification of what severity level they assign to their updates. For example... I think that a service pack of the operating system would be considered IMPORTANT if not CRITICAL... however... Look at this from the identification of the server WSUS from Windows 7 Service Pack 1:

  

  Thus, those who updates you deleted, I'd go throgh your WSUS server to identify how they are identified by gravity, then according to your needs set the parameters of the ISE accordingly to ensure that you get updates you plan.

  Hope this helps everyone out there who has similar problems.

  Thank you

  Dirk

• Cisco ISE synchronization and NTP server

  I am currently implementing Cisco ISE to our customer.

  But having a little problem Cisco ISE cannot synchronize with NTP server.

  Keep in mind, NTP servers in AD.

  Currently, Cisco ISE synchronize just at the local level.

  Cisco ISE implemented distributed mode, when there are two Cisco ISE installed on VMware (Administration & monitoring primary & secondary node), and another is the device (political Service node).

  As a result of it might not sync server NTP and the ISE of Cisco, Cisco ISE often OUT-OF-SYN.

  Is there a solution for this problem?

  Gandhi,

  This is a known issue, I have crossed upwards and have not read that you use AD as your NTP server, there have been problems with integration of the ISE and ACS with AD as their ntp source, please use another device like sources ntp, for example a router.

  Thank you

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• The ISE Cisco switch configuration

  Hi experts,

  I got the following network:

  Devices-> switch access-->--> access switch central office switch-> ISE Server

  All switches are capable IOS for the 802. 1 X and configurations of AAA for ISE to manage network devices. However, I read in the guide on the configuration of the switches in preparation for the deployment of the ISE of CIsco, but I wonder what should I configure switches for access and basic switches or only configure the switches for access to EHT?

  Thanks for your time to read!

  If all clients are non-DHCP clients, then no configuration is based or distribution at all.

  But you may need to search different options of profiling, if the customers are not active DHCP. Access switch supports the function of detection IOS? Would be very useful to have such a that it would send important profiling information at ISE. You may need to use the right options for ISE of profiling to determine the details of the endpoint.

  Concerning

  Vivek

• Cisco ISE, who created a ticket in portal sponsor

  Hi I was wondering how do I see who created a guest in ISE of Cisco user ticket by using the Developer Portal without checking the logs of the system you have to download.

  Is there a better way to do it?

  Kind regards

  operations > reports > endpoints and users > sponsor comments summary

  The summary of Sponsor comments report displays all users comments created by each sponsor. Click on a sponsor's name to view information about guest users.

• Cisco ISE 1.3

  Guys good day.

  I try to configure the new 1.3 ISE of Cisco.

  I use a version of the 7.4.121 of Vwlc software.

  My problem is that when a client authenticates to the ISE server, endpoint is automatically added to the store of identity of internal endpoints.

  For this reason, if the customer comes off the network and try to join again, the client is located in the internal endpoints and is denied access to redirect.

  Is this a bug or is at - it a setting that I can disable?

  you will find ISE Version 1.3 Hotspot Configuration Example

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/identity-services-Eng...

• Change password for local administrator on Cisco ISE in distributed deployment

  Hi guys,.

  I managed four ISEs of Cisco in a distributed environment.

  First ISE is the Admin, second ISE is followed, the third and fourth are the PSN.

  We use local authentication. We want to change the password for the admin user name.

  -What does that by a lucky break the connection between the ISEs or will be the new password pushed to each of them?

  There is no possibility to change the passwords on the PSN as the administration tab is not available.

  I know that when I create a new user, he's pushed all ISEs.

  Thank you.

  Serge.

  Serge,

  Good question.  Once I read this question, I had to know, so I tried this in my lab.

  I changed the admin password and change successfully, I had to connect to ISE using the new password.  Then I noticed on my dashboard to my node communication school admin and my PSN was green.  YAY.  I went to the page of deployments and could access the configurations for the nodes.

  Trust, I logged the secondary node using the NEW PASSWORD.  So, Yes, not only communication does NOT break, the new password is pushed down to all nodes.

  Please rate useful messages and mark this question as answered if, in fact, does that answer your question.  Otherwise, feel free to post additional questions.

  Charles Moreton

• Cisco ISE posture assessment and client provisioning

  Hello

  I have the Cisco ISE and Cisco IOS device. I configured the RADIUS between these devices.

  Also, I configured RADIUSbetween ISE of Cisco and Cisco ASA. Now I want to know that how to posture assessment for these devices (ISE of Cisco and Cisco ASA or ISE Cisco Cisco IOS). Please give me the steps together for assesment for cisco ios device posture in Cisco ise.

  In addition, please give me related to posture assessment and the provisioning client logs.

  Thanks in advance.

  You can go through the list link below to download a PDF link

  Assessment of the posture with ISE.

  http://www.Cisco.com/Web/CZ/expo2012/PDF/T_SECA4_ISE_Posture_Gorgy_Acs.PDF

  ~ BR
  Jatin kone

  * Does the rate of useful messages *.

• Evaluation of posture transmitted by mistake using Cisco ISE

  Hi all

  I would like to help try to understand why a customer who has not been connected to the network for a little over a month has allowed full network access despite being older than 28 days AV definitions.

  We have 2 mandatory requirements of posture,

  1 Symantec Av MUST be installed

  2. the definitions AV MUST be expired LESS THAN 28 days

  Currently, the machine I have watch the defs AV as being 25 March 2013.

  When I produce the detailed report posture, it shows me even that the two mandatory requirements described above were successfully which means that the endpoint is compliant posture. Clearly this is not the case if...!

  Is there anything else I can check on the ISE to help debug this?

  Mario

  Hello

  You may have two problems:

  1 al ' ISE, you have a set global clients not supported of the NAC Agent (Android, etc.) that specifies what their default state of compliance. If the default setting is "consistent" and you do not have a rule in this customer service or you simply do not have client provisioning rules, any machine that does not fit in the provisioning rule (IE thinks them ISE which is not supported) Gets a consistent event compliance status if NAC Agent is installed and that the rules are not met.

  2. problem of ANC Agent version?

  I saw in the papers that you use NAC 4.9.1.6 agent but the latest NAC Agent recommended to be used with (later) ISE is version 4.9.0.51.

  4.9.1.6 is a version of NAC Appliance and Cisco does not guarantee that is 100% compatible with ISE.

  Check

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ISE/1.1.1/compatibility/ise_sdt.html#wp78131

  Cisco NAC Agent Interoperability Between NAC Appliance and Identity Services Engine (ISE)
  Cisco supports different versions of the NAC Agent for integration with  NAC Appliance and ISE. Current releases are developed to work in either  environment, however, interoperability between deployments is not  guaranteed. Therefore, there is no explicit interoperability support for  a given NAC Agent version intended for one environment that will  necessarily work in the other. If you require support for both NAC  Appliance and ISE using a single NAC Agent, be sure to test NAC Agent in  your specific environment to verify compatibility.
  Unless there is a specific defect or feature required for your NAC  Appliance deployment, Cisco recommends deploying the most current agent  certified for your ISE deployment. If an issue arises, Cisco recommends  restricting the NAC Agent's use to its intended environment and  contacting Cisco TAC for assistance. Cisco will be addressing this issue  through the standard Cisco TAC support escalation process, but NAC  Agent interoperability is not guaranteed.
  Cisco is working on an approach to address NAC Agent interoperability testing and support in an upcoming release.