PORT of Configuration.DEFAULT of ASA AnyConnect remote VPN access.

Hello!!! Now, I need to configure the AnyConnect VPN remote access. And I have a question.

The default 443 AnyConnect port, but the port is occupied on SAA. We use this port for another application.

How to change the port to connect? Is this true? Thank you!!!

Hi, please add the following configuration:

  1. Enable the WebVPN on the SAA feature:

    ASA(config)#webvpn
  2. Enable WebVPN services for the external interface of the ASA:
    ASA(config-webvpn)#enable outside
  3. Allow the ASA to listen WebVPN traffic on the custom port number:
    ASA(config-webvpn)#port <1-65535>

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Cisco ASA 5505 remote VPN access to the local network

    I have installed two ASA 5505 VPN site to site that works perfectly.  Now, I also need to have 1 customer site to remote access VPN with Cisco VPN dialer.  I can get the VPN dialer to connect the VPN and get a VPN IP address, but I do not have access to the remote network.  can someone take a look and see what I'm missing?  I have attached the ASA running config.

    Apologize for the misunderstanding.

    To access the remote vpn client 10.10.100.x subnet, the vpn-filter ACL is the opposite.

    Please please share the following ACL:

    FROM: / * Style Definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-marge-haut : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-droit : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bas : 10.0pt ; mso-para-marge-gauche : 0 cm ; ligne-hauteur : 115 % ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

    outside_cryptomapVPN list of allowed ip extended access any 10.10.20.0 255.255.255.224

    TO:

    / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-marge-haut : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-droit : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bas : 10.0pt ; mso-para-marge-gauche : 0 cm ; ligne-hauteur : 115 % ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

    outside_cryptomapVPN to access extended list ip 10.10.20.0 allow 255.255.255.224 all

    Hope that helps.

  • Cisco ASA AnyConnect SSL VPN - certificates + token?

    Hello

    I'm looking for an answer is it possible such configuration:

    The Cisco AnyConnect SSL VPN service with two-factor - first method is the Microsoft CA certificate local and second method - a token solution Symantec VIP password?

    I don't know if two-factor authentication is user/password from Active Directory + OTP by Symantec VIP there is no problem, because you can send the user + pass with Radius, but with certificates I do not really understand who will check the validity of the certificate, which certificate, we will send you to the RADIUS for the validation server and how the configuration of the point of view of ASA will look like.

    Thank you very much for the help!

    Hi Alex,

    I don't see a problem with having certificate + token to connect to the VPN. Certificate authentication must be performed on the SAA, see an example below:

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/blog/152941/AnyConnect-certificate-based-authentication

    Authentication token can be specified as primary/secondary (authentication SDI) on the SAA, an example below:

    http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/vpn_client/AnyConnect/anyconnect31/Administration/Guide/anyconnectadmin31/ac11authenticate.html#pgfId-1060345

    It may be useful

    -Randy-

  • Remote VPN access - add new internal IP address

    Hello

    I have an existing configuration of Cisco VPN client in ASA 5510 for remote access.

    -------------------------------------

    Name of the Group: ISETANLOT10

    Group password: xxxx
     
    IP pool: lot10ippool, 172.27.17.240 - 172.27.17.245
     
    enycrption: 3DES
    authentication: SHA
    ------------------------------------
    the connection was successful, and I was able to ping to the internal server 172.47.1.10.
    Now, there is demand for remote access VPN even can do a ping to access a new server within LAN, 172.57.1.10 & 172.57.1.20
    But with the same VPN access, I was unable to ping the two new IP.
    How can I add both IP in order to make a ping by using the same configuration of remote access VPN?
    I have attached below existing config (edited version)
     
    ===

    : Saved
    :
    ASA Version 8.0 (4)
    !
    hostname asalot10
    names of
    name 172.17.100.22 NAVNew
    name 172.27.17.215 NECUser
    172.47.1.10 NarayaServer description Naraya server name
    name 62.80.122.172 NarayaTelco1
    name 62.80.122.178 NarayaTelco2
    name 172.57.1.10 IPVSSvr IPVSSvr description
    name 122.152.181.147 Japan01
    name 122.152.181.0 Japan02
    name 175.139.156.174 Outside_Int
    name 178.248.228.121 NarayaTelco3
    name 172.67.1.0 VCGroup
    name 172.57.1.20 IPVSSvr2
    !
    object-group service NECareService
    Description NECareService remote
    the eq https tcp service object
    EQ-ssh tcp service object
    response to echo icmp service object
    inside_access_in deny ip extended access list all Japan02 255.255.255.0
    inside_access_in ip VCGroup 255.255.255.0 allowed extended access list all
    inside_access_in list extended access deny tcp object-group PermitInternet any object-group torrent1
    inside_access_in list extended access allowed object-group ip PermitInternet any newspaper disable
    inside_access_in list any newspaper disable extended access allowed host ip NarayaServer
    inside_access_in list extended access permit ip host IPVSSvr all
    inside_access_in list any newspaper disable extended access allowed host ip NAVNew
    inside_access_in list extended access permit ip host 172.17.100.30 all
    outside_access_in list extended access allow object-group objects NECare a NECareService-group
    outside_access_in list extended access allowed host ip DM_INLINE_NETWORK_1 NarayaServer object-group
    outsidein list extended access permit tcp any host Outside_Int eq https
    outsidein list extended access allowed object-group rdp any host Outside_Int debug log
    outsidein list extended access allowed host tcp object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_2 eq Outside_Int 8080
    outsidein list extended access allowed host ip DM_INLINE_NETWORK_3 IPVSSvr object-group
    inside_mpc list extended access allowed object-group TCPUDP any any eq www
    inside_mpc list extended access permit tcp any any eq www
    inside_nat0_outbound list of allowed ip extended access all 172.27.17.240 255.255.255.248
    inside_nat0_outbound list extended access permit ip host NarayaServer Nry_Png object-group
    inside_nat0_outbound list extended access allowed host ip IPVSSvr2 172.27.17.240 255.255.255.248
    outside_cryptomap list extended access permitted ip object-group Naraya_Png-group of objects Nry_Png

    Global interface 10 (external)
    NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_nat0_outbound
    NAT (inside) 10 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
    static (inside, outside) interface tcp 8080 8080 NarayaServer netmask 255.255.255.255
    static (inside, outside) tcp 3389 3389 NAVNew netmask 255.255.255.255 interface
    public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface ssh IPVSSvr2 ssh netmask 255.255.255.255
    Access-group outsidein in external interface
    inside_access_in access to the interface inside group
    Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 175.139.156.173 1
    Route inside 172.17.100.20 255.255.255.255 172.27.17.100 1
    Route inside NAVNew 255.255.255.255 172.27.17.100 1
    Route inside 172.17.100.30 255.255.255.255 172.27.17.100 1
    Route inside NarayaServer 255.255.255.255 172.27.17.100 1
    Route inside 172.47.1.11 255.255.255.255 172.27.17.100 1


    Route inside VCGroup 255.255.255.0 172.27.17.100 1

    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac
    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp - esp-sha-hmac
    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp - esp-md5-hmac
    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-MD5 esp-aes-192 esp-md5-hmac
    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA 256 - aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac
    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-MD5-esp - aes esp-md5-hmac
    Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
    life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
    Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
    Dynamic crypto map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 set pfs
    Crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 value transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA MD5-ESP-3DES ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5
    Dynamic crypto map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 define security association lifetime 28800 seconds
    cryptographic kilobytes 4608000 life of the set - the association of security of the 65535 SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP of the dynamic-map
    card crypto outside_map 1 match address outside_cryptomap
    card crypto outside_map 1 set 218.x.x.105 counterpart
    card crypto outside_map 1 set of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA
    outside_map map 1 lifetime of security association set seconds 28800 crypto
    card crypto outside_map 1 set security-association life kilobytes 4608000
    outside_map card crypto 65535-isakmp dynamic ipsec SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP
    outside_map interface card crypto outside
    crypto ISAKMP allow outside
    crypto ISAKMP policy 10
    preshared authentication
    3des encryption
    sha hash
    Group 2
    life 86400
    crypto ISAKMP policy 30
    preshared authentication
    3des encryption
    md5 hash
    Group 2
    life 86400

    internal ISETANLOT10 group policy
    ISETANLOT10 group policy attributes
    value of server DNS 172.27.17.100
    Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec
    username, password nectier3 dPFBFnrViJi/LGbT encrypted privilege 0
    username nectier3 attributes
    VPN-group-policy ISETANLOT10
    username password necare encrypted BkPn6VQ0VwTy7MY7 privilege 0
    necare attributes username
    VPN-group-policy ISETANLOT10
    naraya pcGKDau9jtKgFWSc encrypted password username
    naraya attribute username
    VPN-group-policy ISETANLOT10
    type of nas-prompt service
    type tunnel-group ISETANLOT10 remote access
    attributes global-tunnel-group ISETANLOT10
    address lot10ippool pool
    Group Policy - by default-ISETANLOT10
    IPSec-attributes tunnel-group ISETANLOT10
    pre-shared-key *.
    tunnel-group 218.x.x.105 type ipsec-l2l
    218.x.x.105 group of tunnel ipsec-attributes
    pre-shared-key *.
    type tunnel-group ivmstunnel remote access
    tunnel-group ivmstunnel General-attributes
    address lot10ippool pool
    ivmstunnel group of tunnel ipsec-attributes
    pre-shared-key *.
    !

    =====

    Remote VPN access must allow the connection, but I'm guessing that your ASA does not know how to get to the two new destinations.

    You have a name and a static route to the job to 172.47.1.10 Server:

    name 172.47.1.10 NarayaServer description Naraya Server

    route inside NarayaServer 255.255.255.255 172.27.17.100 1

    .. but no equivalent for the two new hosts. As a result, all traffic of ASA destiny for them will attempt to use the default route (via the external interface).

    If you add:

    route inside 172.57.1.10 255.255.255.255 172.27.17.100

    route inside 172.57.1.20 255.255.255.255 172.27.17.100

    (assuming this is your correct entry), it should work.

  • WebVPN and remote VPN access

    Hello

    Is there a difference between WebVPN and remote VPN access or they are the same.

    Thank you.

    access remote vpn consists of

    -IPSEC VPN remote access. It is part of the ASA, no permit required, requires pre-installed Client from Cisco VPN IPSEC on PC

    -with AnyConnect SSL VPN remote access. It requires licensing of SSL VPN on SAA. AnyConnect client can be installed automatically on the PC with the launch of web.

    -with Essentials AnyConnect SSL VPN remote access. Beginning with ASA 8.2 (1), almost license $ 0. It's the same AnyConnect client as in the previous article, but it cannot be installed automatically with the launch of web. It must be previously installed as of Cisco IPSEC VPN client.

    -webvpn aka clientless vpn. It is a portal HTTPS which allows HTTP connections, file sharing, telnet, RDP and much more (with smart tunnels) resources without having to install a real client on the PC. It requires licensing of SSL VPN on SAA. It cannot be used if "AnyConnect Essentials" license is activated on SAA after 8.2 (1)

    Kind regards

    Roman

  • ASA5505 can transfer clients to remote VPN access to the local network

    I have currently ASA 5505 and 2911-router and I am trying to configure the VPN topology.

    Can ASA5505 you transmit to remote VPN access clients LAN operated by another router?

    These two cases are possible? :

    (1) ASA 5505 and 2911-router are separate WAN interfaces, each connected directly to the ISP. But so can I connect an other interfaces LAN of ASA 5505 in a switch managed by 2911 router customers to distance-SSL-VPN to inject into the local network managed by the router?
    (2) ASA 5505 is behind router-2911. May 2911 router address public ip or public ip address VPN-access attempts have directly be sent to ASA 5505 when there is only a single public ip address address available?
    Long put short, ASA 5505 can inject its clients to remote-access-VPN as one of the hosts on the local network managed by 2911-router?
    Thank you.

    I could help you more if you can explain the purpose of this configuration and connectivity between the router and ASA.

    You can activate the reverse route on the dynamic plane on the SAA. The ASA will install a static route to the customer on the routing table. You can use a routing protocol to redistribute static routes to your switch on the side of LAN of the SAA.

  • ASA 5520: Remote VPN Clients cannot ping LAN, Internet

    I've set up a few of them in my time, but I am confused with this one.  Can I establish connect via VPN tunnel but I can't ping or go on the internet.  I searched the forum for similar and found a little issues, but none of the fixes seem to match.  I noticed a strange thing is when I run ipconfig/all of the vpn client, the IP address that has been leased over the Pool of the VPN is also the default gateway!

    I have attached the config.  Help, please.

    Thank you!

    Exemption of NAT ACL has not yet been applied.

    NAT (inside) 0-list of access Inside_nat0_outbound

    In addition, you have not split tunnel, not sure you were using internet ASA for the vpn client internet browsing.

    You can also enable icmp inspection if you test in scathing:

    Policy-map global_policy
    class inspection_default

    inspect the icmp

    Hope that helps.

  • IPsec over UDP - remote VPN access

    Hello world

    The VPN client user PC IPSEC over UDP option is checked under transport.

    When I check the details of the phase 1 of IKE ASDM of user login, it shows only UDP 500 port not port 4500.

    Means that user PC VPN ASA there that no device in question makes NAT.

    What happens if we checked the same option in the client IPSEC VPN - over UDP and now, if we see the port UDP 4500 under IKE phase 1 Connection Details

    This means that there is now ASA a NAT device VPN Client PC, but he allows IKE connection phase 1?

    Concerning

    MAhesh

    Hello Manu,

    I suggest to use the following commands on your ASA have a look at these ports as the test of VPN connections. The command that you use depends on your level of software as minor changes in the format of the command

    View details remote vpn-sessiondb

    view sessiondb-vpn remote detail filter p-ipaddress

    Or

    View details of ra-ikev1-ipsec-vpn-sessiondb

    display the filter retail ra-ikev1-ipsec-vpn-sessiondb p-ipaddress

    These will provide information on the type of VPN Client connection.

    Here are a few out of different situations when connecting with the VPN Client

    Dynamic PAT - no Transparent on the Client VPN tunnel

    • Through the VPN connections do not work as connects via PAT without Transparent tunnel

    Username: Index: 22

    Public IP address 10.0.1.2 assigned IP::

    Protocol: IPsec IKEv1

    IKEv1:

    Tunnel ID: 22.1

    The UDP Src Port: 18451 UDP Dst Port: 500

    IKE Neg Mode: Aggressive Auth Mode: preSharedKeys

    Encryption: AES 256 hash: SHA1

    Generate a new key Int (T): 28800 seconds given to the key Left (T): 28551 seconds

    Group D/H: 2

    Name of the filter:

    Client OS: Windows NT Client OS worm: 5.0.07.0290

    IPsec:

    Tunnel ID: 22.2

    Local addr: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0

    Remote addr: 10.0.1.2/255.255.255.255/0/0

    Encryption: AES 256 hash: SHA1

    Encapsulation: Tunnel

    Generate a new key Int (T): 28800 seconds given to the key Left (T): 28551 seconds

    Idle Time Out: 30 Minutes idling left: 25 Minutes

    TX Bytes: 0 Rx bytes: 0

    TX pkts: Rx Pkts 0: 0

    Dynamic PAT - Transparent tunnel (NAT/PAT) on the VPN Client

    • Via VPN connections work as we use Tunneling Transparent when we train the dynamic VPN Client through PAT connection

    Username: Index: 28

    Public IP address 10.0.1.2 assigned IP::

    Protocol: IKEv1 IPsecOverNatT

    IKEv1:

    Tunnel ID: 28.1

    The UDP Src Port: 52825 UDP Dst Port: 4500

    IKE Neg Mode: Aggressive Auth Mode: preSharedKeys

    Encryption: AES 256 hash: SHA1

    Generate a new key Int (T): 28800 seconds given to the key Left (T): 28784 seconds

    Group D/H: 2

    Name of the filter:

    Client OS: Windows NT Client OS worm: 5.0.07.0290

    IPsecOverNatT:

    Tunnel ID: 28.2

    Local addr: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0

    Remote addr: 10.0.1.2/255.255.255.255/0/0

    Encryption: AES 256 hash: SHA1

    Encapsulation: Tunnel

    Generate a new key Int (T): 28800 seconds given to the key Left (T): 28784 seconds

    Idle Time Out: 30 Minutes idling left: 30 Minutes

    TX Bytes: 360 bytes Rx: 360

    TX pkts: 6 Pkts Rx: 6

    Dynamics PAT, Transparent IPsec (TCP) on the Client VPN tunnel

    • Via VPN connections work as we use Tunneling Transparent when we train the dynamic VPN Client through PAT connection

    Username: Index: 24

    Public IP address 10.0.1.2 assigned IP::

    Protocol: IKEv1 IPsecOverTCP

    IKEv1:

    Tunnel ID: 24.1

    The UDP Src Port: 20343 UDP Dst Port: 500

    IKE Neg Mode: Aggressive Auth Mode: preSharedKeys

    Encryption: AES 256 hash: SHA1

    Generate a new key Int (T): 28800 seconds given to the key Left (T): 28792 seconds

    Group D/H: 2

    Name of the filter:

    Client OS: Windows NT Client OS worm: 5.0.07.0290

    IPsecOverTCP:

    Tunnel ID: 24,2

    Local addr: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0

    Remote addr: 10.0.1.2/255.255.255.255/0/0

    Encryption: AES 256 hash: SHA1

    Encapsulation: Tunnel TCP Src Port: 20343

    The TCP Dst Port: 10000

    Generate a new key Int (T): 28800 seconds given to the key Left (T): 28792 seconds

    Idle Time Out: 30 Minutes idling left: 30 Minutes

    TX Bytes: 180 bytes Rx: 180

    TX pkts: Rx 3 Pkts: 3

    Static NAT - no Transparent on the Client VPN tunnel

    • VPN Client connections to the LAN work because our VPN Client has a static NAT configured for its local IP address. This allows the ESP without encapsulation through the device doing the static NAT. You must allow the ESP traffic through the NAT device of management of the device VPN or configure VPN connections inspection if there is an ASA acting as the NAT device.

    Username: Index: 25

    Public IP address 10.0.1.2 assigned IP::

    Protocol: IPsec IKEv1

    IKEv1:

    Tunnel ID: 25.1

    The UDP Src Port: 50136 UDP Dst Port: 500

    IKE Neg Mode: Aggressive Auth Mode: preSharedKeys

    Encryption: AES 256 hash: SHA1

    Generate a new key Int (T): 28800 seconds given to the key Left (T): 28791 seconds

    Group D/H: 2

    Name of the filter:

    Client OS: Windows NT Client OS worm: 5.0.07.0290

    IPsec:

    Tunnel ID: 25.2

    Local addr: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0

    Remote addr: 10.0.1.2/255.255.255.255/0/0

    Encryption: AES 256 hash: SHA1

    Encapsulation: Tunnel

    Generate a new key Int (T): 28800 seconds given to the key Left (T): 28791 seconds

    Idle Time Out: 30 Minutes idling left: 30 Minutes

    TX Bytes: 120 bytes Rx: 120

    TX pkts: Rx 2 Pkts: 2

    Static NAT - Transparent tunnel (NAT/PAT) on the VPN Client

    • The VPN Client connections are functioning normally. Even if the host Staticly using a NAT VPN Client does not need UDP encapsulation it is always used if your connection of the VPN Client profile is configured to use (tab in the Transport of the client software)

    Username: Index: 26

    Public IP address 10.0.1.2 assigned IP::

    Protocol: IKEv1 IPsecOverNatT

    IKEv1:

    Tunnel ID: 26.1

    The UDP Src Port: 60159 UDP Dst Port: 4500

    IKE Neg Mode: Aggressive Auth Mode: preSharedKeys

    Encryption: AES 256 hash: SHA1

    Generate a new key Int (T): 28800 seconds given to the key Left (T): 28772 seconds

    Group D/H: 2

    Name of the filter:

    Client OS: Windows NT Client OS worm: 5.0.07.0290

    IPsecOverNatT:

    Tunnel ID: 26.2

    Local addr: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0

    Remote addr: 10.0.1.2/255.255.255.255/0/0

    Encryption: AES 256 hash: SHA1

    Encapsulation: Tunnel

    Generate a new key Int (T): 28800 seconds given to the key Left (T): 28772 seconds

    Idle Time Out: 30 Minutes idling left: 29 Minutes

    TX Bytes: 1200 bytes Rx: 1200

    TX pkts: Rx 20 Pkts: 20

    Static NAT - Transparent tunnel on the VPN Client (IPsec, TCP)

    • The VPN Client connections are functioning normally. Even if the host Staticly using a NAT VPN Client does not need TCP encapsulation it is always used if your connection of the VPN Client profile is configured to use (tab in the Transport of the client software)

    Username: Index: 27

    Public IP address 10.0.1.2 assigned IP::

    Protocol: IKEv1 IPsecOverTCP

    IKEv1:

    Tunnel ID: 27.1

    The UDP Src Port: 61575 UDP Dst Port: 500

    IKE Neg Mode: Aggressive Auth Mode: preSharedKeys

    Encryption: AES 256 hash: SHA1

    Generate a new key Int (T): 28800 seconds given to the key Left (T): 28790 seconds

    Group D/H: 2

    Name of the filter:

    Client OS: Windows NT Client OS worm: 5.0.07.0290

    IPsecOverTCP:

    Tunnel ID: 27.2

    Local addr: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0

    Remote addr: 10.0.1.2/255.255.255.255/0/0

    Encryption: AES 256 hash: SHA1

    Encapsulation: Tunnel TCP Src Port: 61575

    The TCP Dst Port: 10000

    Generate a new key Int (T): 28800 seconds given to the key Left (T): 28790 seconds

    Idle Time Out: 30 Minutes idling left: 30 Minutes

    TX Bytes: 120 bytes Rx: 120

    TX pkts: Rx 2 Pkts: 2

    VPN device with a public IP address directly connected (as a customer VPN) to an ASA

    Username: Index: 491

    Assigned IP: 172.31.1.239 public IP address:

    Protocol: IPsec IKE

    IKE:

    Tunnel ID: 491.1

    The UDP Src Port: 500 UDP Dst Port: 500

    IKE Neg Mode: Aggressive Auth Mode: preSharedKeys

    Encryption: 3DES hash: SHA1

    Generate a new key Int (T): 86400 seconds given to the key Left (T): 71016 seconds

    Group D/H: 2

    Name of the filter:

    IPsec:

    Tunnel ID: 491.2

    Local addr: 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0

    Remote addr: 172.31.1.239/255.255.255.255/0/0

    Encryption: AES128 hash: SHA1

    Encapsulation: Tunnel

    Generate a new key Int (T): 28800 seconds given to the key Left (T): 12123 seconds

    Generate a new key Int (D): 4608000 K-bytes given to the key Left (D): 4607460 K-bytes

    Idle Time Out: 0 Minutes idling left: 0 Minutes

    TX Bytes: bytes 3767854 Rx: 7788633

    TX pkts: 56355 Pkts Rx: 102824

    Above are examples for your reference. I must also say that I am absolutely not an expert when it comes to virtual private networks in general. I had to learn two firewall/vpn basically on my own, as during my studies, we had no classes related to them (which was quite strange).

    While I learned how to set up VPN and troubleshoot them I think I missed on the basic theory. I had plans to get the title Associates CCNA/CCNP certifications but at the moment everything is possible. Don't have the time for it.

    I guess that you already go to the VPN security CCNP Exam?

    Hope this helps and I hope that I didn't get anything wrong above

    -Jouni

  • is it possible this with remote vpn access?

    Hello

    I have access to my corporate network through the VPN Cisco (software) customer and it goes through the vpn to access configuration remote ipsec on an ASA 5510. Everything works fine.

    But now that connect to the corporate network users also need access to remote sites connected by tunnels VPN site to site networks: tunnels IPSec between mentioned ASA5510 and distance ASA5510s and ASA5505s in the branches.

    Is this possible?

    If so what shoud I consider make it works?

    My setup looks like

    business network: 10.1.1.0/24

    Remote vpn clients receive the ip addresses of: 10.0.5.0/28

    Branch on the remote 1 network: 10.1.10.0/24

    network of remote sites 2: 10.1.20.0/24

    3 remote site network: 10.1.30.0/24

    There rule for NAT exemption which exempts the networks 10.1.10.0/24, 10.1.20.0/24, 10.1.30.0/24

    All traffic on the local network 10.1.1.0/24 have complete ip connectivity with all networks in the branches. The PROBLEM is that the remote vpn clients can reach only local network 10.1.1.0/24, but not the remote networks.

    The ASAs in remote sites has created NAT exemption to the two local network 10.1.1.0/24 and network 10.0.5.0/28 remote access clients, but as I said, it won't. Help, please!

    Thanks in advance!

    Zoran

    Yes, you can...

    Let's take 1 remote sites for example network: network of agencies 1 (10.1.10.0/24):

    Company ASA:

    -If you have split tunnel configured for the VPN Client, you must also add the remote site network in the list (10.1.10.0/24).

    -Crypto ACL between the company ASA and ASA 1 remote sites must have added the following:

    10.0.5.0 ip access list allow 255.255.255.240 10.1.10.0 255.255.255.0

    -' same-security-traffic permit intra-interface' must be configured

    On the remote control of the branch 1 ASA:

    -Crypto ACL between remote branch 1 ASA and company ASA must have added the following:

    ip 10.1.10.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 10.0.5.0 255.255.255.240

    -Rule of exemption NAT to exempt traffic:

    ip 10.1.10.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 10.0.5.0 255.255.255.240

    Clear the tunnels of both ends and test the connectivity.

    I hope this helps.

  • Ping of ASA to remote VPN site

    I am haivng a weird question. I have two ASA in place with a VPN tunnel from site to site between the two. The traffic is through the tunnel without problem. I have a whole allowed for the two locations on the tunenl IP. The issue I'm having is that when I'm on the ASAs I'm not able to ping what anyone at the remote location. PC between locations communicates very well via the VPN tunnel however.

    The reason that I need is to have the ASAs information to syslog for my syslog server appliances. Y at - it something that I'm missing that will allow the ASA contact materials at the remote location?

    When you try to ping, do you "ping inside?

    Also, your custom logging, haven't you set up "logging inside the host"?

  • Binds two ISP ASA to remote VPN Client to connect to instead of creating two profiles on the remote client

    Hello

    just a quick,

    TOPOLOGY

    ASA isps1 - 197.1.1.1 - outside

    ASA ISP2 - 196.1.1.1 - backup

    LAN IP - 192.168.202.100 - inside

    I have configured Tunnel on the interfaces (external and backup), but is to link both legs public to serve a thare as redundancy for vpn users and users of the vpn tunnel leave pointing inside IP whenever they want to establish vpn sssion, we want it to be one, so if an interface fails vpn users will not know , but he will try the second for the connection. instead of creating the profile for the two outside of the leg on the vpn client.

    is this possible?

    Hi Rammany.

    In your case, you have only an ASA that connects with 2 ISP in another segment IP... 196.x.x.x (Link1) & 197.x.x.x (Link2). What your condition is you want to have the VPN client who must be consulted with backup. If 196.x.x.x link fails, it should automatically take 197.x.x.x link. That too we should not have the config set in the VPN client backup server. You don have the possibility of having standby active also in asa single.

    I think n so it will work with your current design.

    This option is if your VPN client supports host name resolution (DNS). You can have the VPN created for both the public IP address share the same host name keeping the bond as the primary address 1 and 2 a secondary address. It will work alone.

    Hope someother experts in our forum can help you with that.

  • How to set up authentication LDAP remote VPN access method?

    In most lab scenarios, documents only show us how to configure credentials local (AAA) or RADIUS to authenticate for VPN remote access.

    Could someone kindly post some documentation or lines of command on the configuration of the LDAP authentication (for example advertising server)?

    Appreciate any help from you...

    Hello

    You can check out:https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/139241/remote-access-vpn-asa-au...

    HTH

    Averroès.

  • NAT overlapping with remote VPN access

    Hi all

    My client has an ASA 5510 at the main location. We're shooting for their remote access VPN SSL needs. 30 or so remote users.

    The problem is that the main site has a number of network 192.168.1.0/24. The number of Linksys routers bought on shelf at any store of default.

    Obviously, by default, it does not work. When users connect to the VPN from home, it connects but network resources are not available.

    I read about overlapping NAT with tunnels of site to another, but that all remote access? Is it possible as well?

    Any help to point me in the right direction would be much appreciated.

    Thank you!

    Look at the PIX / ASA 7.x and later: VPN Site to Site (L2L) with the example of setting up IPsec policy NAT (overlapping of private networks) for more information

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00808c9950.shtml

  • IPSec VPN (remote VPN access) - dynamic NAT

    Hello dear group

    I like ASA 5510 is configured for remote access VPN, ASA authenticates Clients remoter with Radius Server (accounting software) and will be assigned an address IP of VPN-pool (172.16.20.0/24). Prose all in use of authentication with radius server is successful, but there is no any Internet browsing on the client side. I've set up a dynamic NAT rule on the external interface of SAA, I write in the following:

    Interface: outside

    Source: VPN-users object (address pool 172.16.20.0/24)

    The translation of the output interface.

    the NAT rule to above does not. (I think that traffic is not clothed with VPN POOL address via external interface)

    Note: this VPN users access the INTERNET only. (because of this, the pool address range is different with inside the Network Interface)

    Its a favor if you help me how NAT.

    Thank you

    Best regards

    Hello

    Would really need to see your current NAT configurations to the CLI format to determine the problem.

    Naturally, the problem could be as simple as missing the following command on the SAA

    permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

    This command is required on the SAA for traffic to come through an interface and let the same interface. In your case this interface would be "Outside" the customer VPN traffic arrives at the ASA via this interface what is leaving through this interface to the Internet.

    -Jouni

  • INTERNET VIA REMOTE VPN ACCESS

    We have a customer who wants to route all internet traffic to their remote sites of their internet connection to Headquarters. In other words, when users connect to corporate headquarters using Cisco VPN client on their PC, we need to route all internet traffic on through the firewall of the headquarters. Head office is running a ASA place all the VPN configuration. We have a number of virtual private network set up for this customer but would welcome suggestions as to the best way to configure this particular step.

    Thank you very much.

    Hello

    This looks like back or Hairpining for VPN clients, so they could access the Internet through the tunnel.

    In which case it is a ASA 8.2 or earlier:

    permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

    NAT (outside) 1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0---> range of IP addresses assigned to VPN clients.

    Global 1 interface (outside)

    In which case it is an ASA 8.3 or later:

    permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

    network vpn-pool objects

    subnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

    dynamic NAT interface (outdoors, outdoor)

    !

    On the configuration of VPN:

    mypolicy group policy attributes

    Split-tunnel-policy tunnelall

    !
    tunnel-group mytunnel General-attributes

    MyPolicy defaul-group-policy

    !

    Benefits:

    1-Internet access is controlled by the ASA.

    Disadvantages:

    1 Internet connection of the ASA is severely affected, it will be used by VPN clients to access the Internet.

    Alternative solution:

    Send all traffic to a Layer 3 internal device or a server that has an external Internet connection, so the ASA forwards all traffic to this device, if this device is able to perform web filterting advance as the unit of Microsoft IIS, then you would have a powerful way to control your users and that they access, thus preventing sites such undesirable sites for adults and animation.

    To do this, all you need is:

    Route within 0 0 192.168.10.1 tunnele---> where the 192.168.10.1 corresponds to the internal device responsible for providing Internet.

    * Remember that this device must have an external connection for Internet access, not on the SAA.

    Let me know.

    Portu.

    Please note any workstation that will be useful.

    Post edited by: Javier Portuguez

Maybe you are looking for

  • Librarian needs help

    On my 2011 Mac Mini (OSX El Capitan) I seem to have two libraries - photos Finder shows the entries for - iPhoto Library.photolibrary and Photos Library.photoslibrary The two have different pictures in these libraries - what they are for, and I can m

  • Satellite C660-20 t: need to get the warranty for the India

    I intend to buy the laptop of KAU model: Satellite C660 20 T.I stay in India will I get the warranty of my tour in India? Help, please...

  • HP G72: forgotten password

    I have windows 7 premium... I forgot the password and do not have a password reset disk. What should I do?

  • a microsoft tech comes to me called saying there is a spread of the virus.

    a microsoft tech has just called me and said I had a virus. He had me then download a teamviewer program witch allow him to take control of my computer. is it true or not. He cut me short and said that they only work half days on Friday.

  • Adobe Illustrator pixelated after update to 2015

    Today, I ran the update to Illustrator 2015 and for a moment the paths are pixelated. I was working on this specific issue before the update and everything was perfect.Any ideas on what may have caused this? Difficulty?Thank you.