Position hierarchy based on secondary assignments.

Hello

We have created a hierarchy of position. When you set the hierarchy for a position, which is a secondary assignment for one person, is visible.
However, when we create a PO and transmit to the person from whom the secondary position in the hierarchy, does not come forward to the list.
If we include position primary assignment in the hierarchy, that the person is available at the front to the list.
Is there any sort of data security works behind?

Abdul Wahid
http://iwidi.org

I understand what you are looking forward is an enhancement request
Take a look on the underside of ER

1351979: APPROVAL WORKFLOW ON THE ALLOCATION SECONDARY IN THE HIERARCHY OF THE POSITION

Purchase uses only primary assignments for buying functions.
To use the hierarchy of Position, it must be main Setup on the employee
assignment.

Tags: Oracle Applications

Similar Questions

  • Security hierarchy based in OBIEE

    Hello

    I have a simple request, but will have a hard time trying to figure it out.

    I have a dimension store with the following levels: store - city - country

    I have a single measure in the fact table: sale

    I want to be able to allow users a specific group access sales grouped by country, but not being able to go into the details by city or store.

    Other users would be able to see the sales by country and city and no stores.

    A third group of users would be abe to see sales of all three surveys.

    How can I achieve this in the security model for RPD?

    Thank you

    Joao Moreira

    Hi João,.

    It is possible. check these items. Looks like useful for this.

    Security at the level of the handful of hierarchy OBIEE - function IndexCol | GerardNico.com (BI, OBIEE, data warehouse and OWB)

    A different look at the hierarchy based security in OBIEE | Carpediemconsulting blog

    Thank you
    AJ

  • restrict the application of hierarchy based on a given value at the leaf node level

    Is it possible to restrict a query of the hierarchy based on a test given at the leaf node level?

    For example, in the data presented below, I like to shoot the entire hierarchy for terminal nodes that have 'John' in the criteria:

    Parent value criteria
    Z
    A Z
    B HAS
    C B John
    D B Smith
    E Z
    F E
    John F G
    H F Neal
    I have F John

    Filertering on John I want to return together to resemble the following prints:
    A
    B
    C
    F
    G
    I have

    I tried the following, but it only gives me the nodes:
    SELECT
    LPAD (' ', (LEVEL) * 3,'.) ') || t.Valeur
    OF tbl_test t
    WHERE t.criteria = "John".
    START WITH t.valeur = "Z".
    CONNECT BY PRIOR t.valeur = t.parent;

    Rule return form the above query:
    C
    G
    I have

    Any help is greatly appreciated.

    It is possible, but not conventional =)

    Sys_connect_by_path allows you to concatenate the path and another request of the hierarchy of dividing a value generated in the rows.

    with t as (
    select 'Z' as  Val , null as  Par, null as  Criteria from dual union all
    select 'A' as  Val , 'Z' as  Par, null as  Criteria from dual union all
    select 'B' as  Val , 'A' as  Par, null as  Criteria from dual union all
    select 'C' as  Val , 'B' as  Par, 'John' as  Criteria from dual union all
    select 'D' as  Val , 'B' as  Par, 'Smith' as  Criteria from dual union all
    select 'E' as  Val , 'Z' as  Par, null as  Criteria from dual union all
    select 'F' as  Val , 'E' as  Par, null as  Criteria from dual union all
    select 'G' as  Val , 'F' as  Par, 'John' as  Criteria from dual union all
    select 'H' as  Val , 'F' as  Par, 'Neal' as  Criteria from dual union all
    select 'I' as  Val , 'F' as  Par, 'John' as  Criteria from dual
    )
    select distinct regexp_substr(path, '[^,]+', 1, level) as val
    from (  SELECT  sys_connect_by_path(val,',') as path , rownum as row_id
              FROM   t
            WHERE t.criteria = 'John'
            START WITH t.val = 'Z'
            CONNECT BY t.par = PRIOR t.val
         )
    connect by nocycle regexp_substr(path, '[^,]+', 1, level) is not null
    and prior row_id= row_id
    and prior dbms_random.value is not null
    
  • pulling a description field in a hierarchy based on an ID to a different hierarchy

    Hello

    I could use some help, I am a newbie of DRM and use it for the first time, picking up some old data for my company who have nobody to ask, and I am way over my head at the moment.

    I am shooting a description local property (testDescription) on a hierarchyA in a hierarchyB node node based on two different local properties that have the same value, call the testIDa to hierarchyA and testIDb for hierarchyB.

    I created a property called testPullDescription , with a derived formula that I hope to use the hierarchyB for this reason, the formula takes the 'empty' value now.

    HierNodePropValue (hierarchyA,testIDa,testDescription)

    Right now, when I look at hierarchyB, testPullDescription value is empty.

    I know it's fake because nowhere in the syntax can I specify testIDb to actually compare the two IDS, but I don't know enough about the DRM to know what is the right formula to get this working correctly?

    Thank you and best regards,

    Derek

    Hi Derek,.

    One of the challenges of DRM is keeping in mind when a local node attempts to access to a global node property and vice versa. Bugs will often result when not done properly. Rather than focus on forms of DRM, you should really start to pass to the Script, because they are more efficient, and that coding is easier to read and manage.

    TestPullDescription in order to become a property derived local, try to use the below in your script and see if it works for you:

    yesterday var is node. Version.HierByAbbrev ("hierarchyA");

    var / / desc = null;

    If (yesterday. NodeExist ("testIDa"))

    {

    Var NodeA is yesterday. NodeByAbbrev ("testIDa");

    DESC = nodeA.PropValue ("testDescription");

    }

    return of ESCR;

    Sonny

  • Problem creating hierarchy based on 2 physical dimension tables

    I'm having a problem create 1 dimension logic with a hierarchy of exploration, based on two separate physical dimension tables. The errors I get when navigating in the exploring hierarchy is:
    "Cannot find coverage source logical table to the columns of the logical" &
    "Missing join between the logical tables.

    I use OBIEE 10.1.3.4
    Here are the details of what I have set up as:

    Physical layer:
    Table DIM_ORG with the dimension columns:
    -dimension_key
    -org_total_code
    -org_total_description
    -org_detail_code
    -org_detail_description

    Dimension table DIM_DEPT with columns:
    -dimension_key
    -dept_total_code
    -dept_total_description
    -dept_detail_code
    -dept_detail_description

    FACT_SALES table with columns of facts:
    -fk_org
    -fk_dept
    -sum_sales

    Physical joins:
    FACT_SALES.fk_org = DIM_ORG_dimension_key
    FACT_SALES.fl_dept = DIM_DEPT.dimension_key

    Business model and the mapping of layer:
    I created a logical dimension ORG_DEPT. It contains two sources of logic table (DIM_ORG & DIM_DEPT) and the following logical columns:
    -All departments (mapped to dept_total_code)
    -Organization (mapped to org_detail_description)
    -Organisation number (mapped to org_detail_code)
    -Department (mapped to dept_detail_description)
    -Department Code (mapped to dept_detail_code)
    The logical key of the company is based on the combination of number of organization & Department Code

    The hierarchy, I need is: all departments-> organization-> Department so I created the following hierarchy for ORG_DEPT:
    -Total level containing: all departments
    -Organization level containing: company (defined as logical level key) number & Organisation (als defined the key level drill)
    / Department detail level containing: Department (defined as logical level key) Code and the Department (defined as key level drill).

    In the LTS of the ORG_DEPT dimension, I've set levels of content for sources:
    DIM_ORG: Level of organization
    DIM_DEPT: Level of detail Department
    The LTS non - joins inner - came against the associated physical tables.

    I created a logical fact table (based on the physical fact table) SALES and joined him on the ORG_DEPT logical dimension table.
    In the LTS, level of content for ORG_DEPT is part of the level of retail service. Non - joins inner were aded against related physical tables.

    When I create a report in response to test the hierarchy and select only "all departments' I get the value of the returned correct size. When I try to break through to the next level, I get the following ODBC error:
    "Could not find coverage source logical table for logical columns: [all of them]." "Please check more detailed level keys are correctly mapped.

    When I create a report in responses and select "Every department" and "Sales", I get the correct result. When I try to break through to the next level, I get a different ODBC error:
    "Lack of join between the logical tables DIM_DEPT and DIM_DEPT: there must be at least a physical link to join between the underlying physical tables.

    All suggestions are welcome!

    Thank you!

    You have no relationship defined between the Department and org.

    You can either:
    a. create a table of physical dimension with a composite key of org_id & dept_id if there is a relationship defined somewhere, then to obiee model as you have already done, but in the physical layer on the composite key join
    b. model your exisitng as two-dimensional and two hierarchies tables and set up a path of forest favorite between them according to your needs.

    Kind regards

    Robert

  • Query to calculate how old an overall outstanding is based on the counting of the FIFO

    Hi all

    I'm writing a query that tells me how old stock positions are based on FIFO method of metering for each day, an operation has been performed. I'd appreciate any help I can get.

    Version information:

    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - 64bi PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production CORE 10.2.0.5.0 Production TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production

    Sample data:

    Create table transactions (name varchar2(20), trade_date date, quantity number)

    insert into transactions ('VODAPHONE', to_date('01/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),100);
    insert into transactions ('VODAPHONE', to_date('02/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),-10);
    insert into transactions ('VODAPHONE', to_date('03/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),-110);
    insert into transactions ('VODAPHONE', to_date('04/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),200);
    insert into transactions ('VODAPHONE', to_date('05/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),40);
    insert into transactions ('VODAPHONE', to_date('06/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),70);
    insert into transactions ('VODAPHONE', to_date('07/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),40);
    insert into transactions ('VODAPHONE', to_date('08/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),-150);
    insert into transactions ('VODAPHONE', to_date('09/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),-10);
    insert into transactions ('ROYAL DUTCH SHELL', to_date('01/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),40);
    insert into transactions ('ROYAL DUTCH SHELL', to_date('02/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),30);
    insert into transactions ('ROYAL DUTCH SHELL', to_date('03/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),-80);
    insert into transactions ('ROYAL DUTCH SHELL', to_date('04/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),-150);
    insert into transactions ('ROYAL DUTCH SHELL', to_date('05/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),-220);
    insert into transactions ('ROYAL DUTCH SHELL', to_date('06/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),100);
    insert into transactions ('ROYAL DUTCH SHELL', to_date('07/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),10);
    insert into transactions ('ROYAL DUTCH SHELL', to_date('08/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),30);
    insert into transactions ('BARCLAYS', to_date('01/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),300);
    insert into transactions ('BARCLAYS', to_date('02/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),40);
    insert into transactions ('BARCLAYS', to_date('03/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),-340);
    insert into transactions ('BARCLAYS', to_date('04/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),-60);
    insert into transactions ('BARCLAYS', to_date('05/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),-50);
    insert into transactions ('BARCLAYS', to_date('06/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),-100);
    insert into transactions ('BARCLAYS', to_date('07/01/2013','DD/MM/YYYY'),60);
    

    Output should look like this:

    StockTrade_DateQuantity
    VODAPHONE01/04/201320
    VODAPHONE01/05/201340
    VODAPHONE01/06/201370
    VODAPHONE01/07/201340
    ROYAL DUTCH SHELL01/04/2013-20
    ROYAL DUTCH SHELL01/05/2013-220
    BARCLAYS01/05/2013-50
    BARCLAYS01/06/2013-100

    Thanks in advance

    Hello

    Interesting problem!

    You can use the analytic SUM function, like this:

    WITH got_analytics AS

    (

    SELECT name, trade_date, quantity

    SUM (amount) (PARTITION BY NAME

    SIGN (quantity)

    ORDER BY trade_date

    ) AS running_total_quantity

    SUM (CASE

    WHEN quantity > 0

    THEN the amount

    END

    ) OVER (PARTITION BY name

    ) AS total_pos

    SUM (CASE

    Amount of TIME<>

    THEN the amount

    END

    ) OVER (PARTITION BY name

    ) AS total_neg

    Transactions

    )

    SELECT name

    trade_date

    CASE

    WHEN total_pos + total_neg > 0

    THEN the LEAST (amount

    running_total_quantity + total_neg

    )

    More GREAT THING (quantity

    running_total_quantity + total_pos

    )

    END AS quantity_left

    OF got_analytics

    WHERE running_total_quantity >-total_neg

    OR running_total_quantity<>

    ORDER BY name DESC

    trade_date

    ;

    There could be a more elegant way to get the same results.

    Post edited by: FrankKulash

    I've simplified the WHERE clause.  I posted

    WHERE (total_pos + total_neg > 0)

    AND running_total_quantity >-total_neg

    )

    OR (total_pos + total_neg<>

    AND running_total_quantity<>

    )

    that was redundant.

  • Hierarchy of basic level?

    Hello


    I have two dimension tables with a join relationship in the physical layer, and now I need on top of the 2 tables to create the hierarchy level in layer MDB database.

    By maintenance single logical table with all the columns required 2 tables (using multiple LTS) and the creation of hierarchy on this subject.

    I want to know is this is the right way to create the hierarchy level?

    or is there an alternative way to do it,

    Please need your suggestions.

    Thank you.

    Since you have 2 tables proceed as below:

    Suppose DimA and Edin are 2 tables and you want to create the hierarchy of basic level for Edin. In this case, another table DimA treat it as a fact and create aliases for this dim as FactDimA.

    Participates in the physical layer
    FactDimA-> DimA
    FactDimA-> Edin

    MDB: Pull these 3 tables and create the hierarchy based according to the needs and for another dim just create the default hierarchy

    Use the settings in FactDimA and descriptive or column of type char DimA

    If you have any questions; I guess you're not as I said.

    Finally mark it as correct ;)

  • How layer div rather than another without absolute positioning

    Hi again!

    Today, I try to shoot a div containing a SWF inside upward while it is organization layered on another div.

    Web Site: showcase restoration | Homepage

    I don't want to use absolute positioning, because then it goes back only this div and let the rest of the div where they were originally.

    Is it possible that I can exclude the function positioning and just make sure the header div can layer a bit on the empty div, packaging, and cursor?

    Also, I know there are errors with the website that will catch the scanner, I'll be cleaning up those very soon, it's just a matter, that I would get hit first.

    Any help is greatly appreciated!

    You cannot superimpose elements without adding a shape any positioning in combination with top, left, bottom or right attributes. The position "in the stack" (overlay) is normally controlled by the position of the element in the HTML itself, later in the code is closer to the top of the card game if you want. Index-Z must be added to change this default layering, but does nothing without positioning relative, absolute or fixed.

    You just need to understand the differences between a static, absolute and relative positioning (fixed also exists, but would not be used here) and some of its subtleties, to make this work.

    Static positioning is the default when nothing is added to the css. Most of the sites require only never static, as well as the floats, margins and padding to position elements, but because you specifically want an overlap, you will need one of the other three (my guess is on will be the best here).

    Absolute positioning is based on the upper-left corner of the nearest of the positioned element relative (relative, absolute or fixed). If there is no positioned parent, use the top left of the browser view port. Using absolute positioning completely removes the element of the natural flow of the page, leaving no space behind him and it will not interact with other elements on the page.

    Relative positioning is based on the normal position of the element in the document flow. Adding position: relative to an element, without changing what else, will appear to do nothing. Added up, left, down or right: value of attribute sets will move the element this sum of its normal position AND leave the space behind the element normally takes upwards if there is no positioning added. This will be to use very probably, as long as you are not moving your items over long distances (which would create a vacuum away where the element ends upward.)

    Fixed positioning is going to stick an element to something high, low or the adjustment of your use and even few matter how big/small browser view port is or if the page scrolls. You see this most often used with navigation bars "sticky."

  • Hierarchy of norms in report

    Hello
    I created two hierarchy based on size alone.
    Hierarchy 1 contains a Total of order-> order number (key), client, OrderType
    higher level--> command-line no. (key), the order is invoiced
    Then level-> Date (key).
    2 hierarchy contains the year-> month-> week-> Date. Here are Date child column shared.

    My questions is, if I pull the hierarchy of the order the report showing only key columns. How to reach other columns as sales order, OrderType, in respective levels.
    Please help on this.

    By selecting multiple keys in a key line, drop down through actually a composite key.

    If you are using 11g check use for display.

    Try to select the keys as composite keys.

  • How to set an assignment as a primer in multiple assignments

    Hi all

    We have several assignments for a person and that an assignment is primary and all others are secondary assignments.
    So, how can we make an assignment to a primary assignment and how all other assignments as secondary assignments?

    Thank you
    Anil

    On the screen, you have primary assignment tab optino--> various. If you checked the main flag, then it will be the main, otherwise it would be secondary.

  • Tecra A4: cannot detect the enterprise WLAN

    Hello

    I downloaded the latest drivers Intel ProWireless 2200BG but still I can't connect to the WLAN in our company. We use the Orinoco Proxima AP-4000-access point. Access point has also been updated. My machine detects other networks wireless but not this one. This isn't the only Toshiba with this problem. If I attach external WLAN to PCMCIA card - slot I find the network.

    Could someone give me some advice.

    Fr. O - P Hyvönen

    Hello

    Please check the advanced search option and use the 2200BG as search terms. You will find a lot of interesting topics on Wireless 2200BG Network card. Known periodic execution drops of this map based on the used authentication method are based on previous assignments.

    It is also interesting that Intel 9.x WLAN drivers implement a kind of new specification that allows the specific configuration of the access point country.

  • PSC disconnected in MAX but meets the UDP broadcasts

    Hey guys,.

    I have 4 controllers of PCP in the control of a whole bunch of sensors on the ground. Each sensor has its own calibration, and so I built an OO hierarchy based on dynamic distribution to cope. Now, there is a piece of generic software and 4 controllers use to perform their tasks (acquisition and newspaper). The first large work three controllers and run everyday, the fourth died within an hour of running. It's the exact same architecture and the code on the controllers.

    I have a thread separate from the network that sends data to the device via a UDP port health - it it broadcasts to the network (CPU utilization, Uptime, HARD disk space). For the fourth controller, I will notice you after an hour it is disconnected to the MAX, I can't FTP in there, I can't connect through the LabVIEW project, BUT this wireless network is still alive and broadcast on the network.

    Can someone answer the following two questions?

    (1) in regard to being active - broadcast signal why is this exactly? I can't move on through MAX or the FTP server...
    (2) regarding the crash of the fourth controller-> the fourth controller has some complex calculations where he tries to determine the root of a polynomial. The NI_AALPro of the Toolkit OR serves that and is quite heavy. There's even a call to the DLL. I have a suspicion that these VI is originally the RT controller to plant. I'll check tomorrow by turning off in the code, but someone at - it does this kind of thing before and are having problems?

    Thank you!

    Hey guys,.

  • ListField only drawing the top row

    I'm having a problem with using the ListField component and using a custom inside the drawListRow (.) drawing of the callback object.

    I have the following code;

     public void drawListRow(ListField list, Graphics g, int index, int y, int w) {
            int imageHeight = 80;
            int imageWidth = 80;
            int leftMargin = 3;
            int topMargin = 3;
            int padding = 5; //space between adjacent elements
    
            //get the item to be displayed...
            Item item = (Item)listElements.elementAt(index);
    
            //draw the item's image, title, description etc..
            g.drawBitmap(new XYRect(leftMargin,topMargin,imageWidth,imageHeight),item.getImage(),0,0); //image is 80x80, positions x=3, y=3
            g.drawText(item.getTitle(),imageWidth+padding+leftMargin,topMargin);
            g.drawText(item.getDescription(),leftMargin,imageHeight+padding);
        }
    

    My installation works, I add a line to the list (and the line is OK), however, when I add a second line, the second row is created but it is empty.

    Any help is appreciated!

    The 'y' parameter passed to this callback method represents the top of the list to start to paint, I do not see where you set the position is based on this value.

    It seems to me that you can be painting each line of position 'y' in the top row.

  • How to add the offset to the items of id for the page scrolling

    Hello world

    I use jQuery scrolling page which requires jQuery easing, and I applied scrolling page class ID to several elements of the image throughout the site. He is also working on the elements of the section of the site.

    The issue I'm having is when any category id are selected in the navigation bar, for example in 'services', click on "Why choose us" in the drop-down menu, you will see it scrolls to this element, but it is placing too high up on the screen and part of this element is covered by the upper navigation bar.

    What I want to do, it's somehow add an offset from the elements id so that he finds a little lower on the screen just below the navigation bar, as it does for the elements of the section of the site. For example, 'our team', which is placed in a section works fine.

    Please see website link and jQuery code for below.

    http://www.clockdoctors.co.UK/test/

    jQuery for the functionality of scrolling page - requires the plugin of jQuery acceleration

    {$(function()}

    $('a.page-scroll').bind ("click", {function (event)}

    var $anchor = $(this);

    $('html,_body').stop (.animate({))

    scrollTop: $($anchor.attr ('href')) .top () may

    (}, 1500, "easeInOutExpo");

    Event.preventDefault ();

    });

    });

    I see. in this case, you may need to add an offset spesific for different updates page with anchors and based on the location of where change of resolution:

    you would use ID at all that will change your layout and you don't want that. in this case change all your refferals in a label - anchors

    and then in the CSS position them based on the resolution in a relative path:

    CSS:

    {#myName}

    position: relative;
    Top:-100px;

    }

    In short: all the ID change them as anchors instead of ID, then according to the resolution change the value at the top so it fits perfectly in all the page layouts.

    PS. my suggestion if possible rather collapse the header make more minimalist height when the user scrolls down, so it's less work and it takes less space in the content.

  • 39008 repository consistency checking "not themselves"?

    I use the Administration tool 11.1.1.6.0 with a version of the repository of 318.

    I imported my star of metadata from the database schema using OCI connection. All joints were included, so I can't go to physics-> fact Table - > physical diagram-> object (s) and Direct and it joins sees my fact table related to all my dimension tables. I then clicked on-and-dragged my diagram to the business layer. I created my size by right clicking on my logical tables in the business layer and choose the logical size create-> Dimension with hierarchy based on the level. It worked for all of the dimensions that had only one level (base level and a high level of total), but resulted in weird errors when done for dimensions with more than one level. I had the time these errors by manually creating these dimensions, click-and - drag logical columns to and implementation of the keys.

    Only now when I do I have consistency check, I have three of the following warnings, one for each dimension that has several levels:
    WARNINGS:
    
    
    Business Model [Business Model]:
    [39008] Logical dimension table [Logical Table] has a source [Physical Table?] that does not join to any fact source.
    At least, I think it is made reference to the Table of physics, but change the physical Table name does not change the error message if done to change the name of the logical Table, so I'm not really sure of what it is. Here's what it looks like precisely:
    [39008] Logical dimension table Time has a source TIME that does not join to any fact source.
    Now, each of the three levels many dimensions have a base with a key level that is present in the fact Table. I can even right-click on the fact Table on the layer business and go to the physical model or diagram of Business model and get a diagram of my fact table related to all of its dimensions, including the three in question. Analysis to OBIEE work as long as I do not use these three dimensions.

    Does anyone have an idea what I'm missing here?

    In MDB made-> Source-> properties-> tab content
    Look for the time set in detail or no matter what level you need.

    Earlier, I don't see your error 2 message to answer more specific

Maybe you are looking for