Pre-built SQLite Database faster than the construction of the tables?

Similar Questions

• Clean install of Windows a lot faster than the preinstalled system?

  My satallite comes with windows 64-bit installed.
  Since a lot of people suggested, here and elsehwere, a clean installation making consierably faster than the pre-installed windows (all bloated and unwanted software uninstalled with the uninstall program).

  Although fresh installtion was faster without drivers and programs, it has become more or less the same after installation of all software, etc. (perhaps a difference of 2 to 4% in the use of RAM) (over 4 GB)

  Is this normal or do others go much faster on any new install, for me, this effort has proved there is not a lot of use to do a clean install to drive retail.

  Ideas, wiers and feed back?

  See you soon

  Many pre-installed utilities are required for correct functionality and it can be a headache get these functions to work after installing a street copy of Windows.

  You will find that when you install Antivirus software on a street copy of Windows, it will happen similar to the pre-installed Windows installation. So if you want that the installation of Windows pre-installed perform better, uninstall the Antivirus should do the trick.

• Is faster than the HP Mini 110 Microsoft Surface?

  My HP Mini 110 series netbook is SLOW and it is 2 years old and the Microsoft Surface seems newer, but I want to know if the Microsoft Surface would go faster (for example, loading programs and files, etc.)

  The HP Mini 110 has an Intel Atom processor and the Microsoft Surface has an ARM processor.

  The Microsoft Surface would be faster than the HP Mini 110?

  It must be such that it is a newer CPU, but until the Surface is in the hands of consumers, we do not have really the real world benchmarks. I am 100% sure that whatever that is released by Microsoft or others would show much faster and better in all aspects. But these are marketing people making conversation, not technicians running the real numbers.

• Why disable SuperFetch on ssd, if the RAM is much faster than the ssd?

  Directed by Microsoft that SuperFetch and PreFetch must be disabled, if the OS is installed on an ssd, in accordance with article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2727880. But SuperFetch is used for loading the data components of applications, which were very often used for RAM. Although the ssd is faster that a hard drive is not faster than the RAM. So, I do not understand why Microsoft suggest disabling this feature. The only reason why I want to understand, it's because of a limited RAM. If the RAM is sufficient beyond 6 GB, if we disable SuperFetch, then the boot time and increase the loading time of most used applications. I miss something here?

  The other question is about PreFetch. I feel, maybe wrong, it does the same thing with SuperFetch, with one major difference. It loads all the information data on the ssd or hard drive, instead of the RAM, in order to accelerate the launch of applications and time when the OS is installed on a hard drive to boot. If I'm right, let's disable the PreFetch it stores information for one ssd or hdd, while SuperFetch stores data of RAM information, which is much faster and so it must be enabled if there is a sufficient RAM.

  I look forward to reading the notice of a Microsoft software engineer.

  Hi Leventis,

  Prefetch copies frequently accessed files together into a contiguous on the disk area so that they can be located and loaded more quickly. That it takes a lot of old drives to recover data faster.

  SuperFetch predict what applications you run next and preload all the necessary data in the memory. She has also done that with startup files. And for all the three days he sends a defragmentation command to the OS drive that will cause problems in the SSD drives.

  In traditional hard drives (HDD) data are scattered throughout the disk, so that the operating system for access, it will take more time. It is suggested to perform a disk defragmentation. But storage technology is different in SSD, where, it records the data dynamically and it recovers more quickly. Who will be low down the burden on the RAM and the RAM can be used for uses such as for the opening of the games graphics high-end, etc..

  Hope this information is useful.

• Is faster than the local AIR IOS app remote SWF SWF because I can ' t use the unloading code.

  Are faster than the local SWF on AIR IOS app remote SWF because I can't use the code to unload on IOS of AIR.

  my local code:

  Stop();

  import flash.net.URLRequest;

  import flash.system.ApplicationDomain;

  import flash.system.LoaderContext;

  import flash.filesystem.File;

  import flash.filesystem.FileMode;

  import flash.filesystem.FileStream

  go_level_2.addEventListener (MouseEvent.Click, Level_2);

  function level_2(event:MouseEvent) {}

  var loader2:Loader = new Loader();

  var loaderContext2:LoaderContext = new LoaderContext (false, ApplicationDomain.currentDomain);

  var file2:File = File.applicationDirectory.resolvePath ("level2.swf");

  loader2. Load (new URLRequest (file2.url), loaderContext2);

  addChild (loader2);

  }

  Because it works for me, because I can't unload the SWF app file en becomes slow, I'll put the SWf file "s on a remote location.

  But I can't imagine what is happening when I loaded the SWF file remotely. It remains on the server, or it remains on my application when I unloaded it, and the app gets also larger. I hope you can help me because I went on the internet for a week and do not now how to go further.

  I had a similar problem, but not on iOS.

  Maybe my solution might work for you too, however.

  The problem was this line:

  new LoaderContext (false, ApplicationDomain.currentDomain);

  Do not reuse the same field of application, or you will never be able to get rid definitions and thus the SWF loaded.

  Instead, make a new child application domain for the current domain, keep track of it and it has as well as the rest of the SWF file when you are finished.

  Example:

  var loader2:Loader = new Loader();

  var appDomain2:ApplicationDomain = new ApplicationDomain (ApplicationDomain.currentDomain);

  var loaderContext2:LoaderContext = new LoaderContext (false, appDomain2);

  var file2:File = File.applicationDirectory.resolvePath ("level2.swf");

  loader2. Load (new URLRequest (file2.url), loaderContext2);

  addChild (loader2);

  Then

  function finishLevel2(event:Event):void

  {

  var loader2:Loader;

  	loader2 = Event.Target.Loader;
  	loader2.parent.removeChild (loader2);
  	loader2.unloadAndStop (); appDomain2 = null;

  }

  Note that the definitions of the classes of the loaded SWF file will be available in the new application domain.

• Why preview is rendered faster than the actual speed of my clips?

  When I create a new project, the overview of my project "plays" faster than the speed of the video. As it is fast forward. Each of the speed of clips are 100%.

  I tried to uninstall and reinstall the first but still have the same problem.

  Any idea? Thank you

  sample rate is 48 kHz

  Some people set their entry to 'none', but I do not see as to how that is going to change anything

• something faster than the UNION ALL?

  Hello
  
  I have two tables, with 20% and 80% of a total Group of data.
  The next time you press data, I need to have one top index so that the total dataset can be scanned.
  
  The result of this update is an update of the two tables.
  
  Here's my question (pls ignore syntax errors):
  
  I could do something like:
  
  create new_table
  As select * from t1
  UNION ALL
  Select * from t2
  
  change new_table add a primary key (acc_no)
  
  and then
  drop table t1
  drop table t2
  
  then the next cycle of treatment happens that, using new_table and a new set of entry, the t1 and t2 are filled (updates/inserts; and non-modifications/old)
  
  Then, new new_table is generated by t1 and t2... with a new index.
  
  This table is used again to read the next incoming batch of data, new filling t1 and t2...
  etc etc.
  
  actually, we have table t1 to send out of the database (flatfile). Then maybe we can do something faster as well. Maybe we don't need two tables at all?
  
  
  QUESTION 1:
  rather than generate a new table OF T2 T1 UNION ALL, I rather have the new table 'to be' the two tables? In this case, I just need to build the index on the table. Of course, t1 and t2 would disappear, but I have to drop them in any case for the next set of data.
  
  QUESTION 2:
  a little more advanced, is this table that combines all the results in the next 'as-is', must in fact be a table? I just need the appropriate fields (hm, in fact - all - fields) so I can make a new t1 and t2; There may be some smarter way to do it, without actually creating a new table t1 and t2 all the time...
  
  a big thank you in advance, your help is greatly appreciated
  
  Arne

  Rustydud wrote:
  Hi Dave Hemming.

  two thoughts on this approach,
  first of all I have not needed to keep the info on what were t1 and t2; they can be recessed. Rather the other way around, t1 + t2 will be "reborn" in the next run, based on the staging of new data and the "union all" table of the previous run (t1 + t2). then you see IS t1 + t2, after which t1/t2 would become useless.

  No, I do not say that you will not regenerate the tables t1 and t2. There is only one only true table new_table. Everything you would do the table t1 that you do view t1 and it is done as if by magic to the underlying new_table. Even with t2 - there is an opinion, not a table.

  The other approach is a view new_table which is a union of the tables t1 and t2, but then how do you index?

• R7000 Nighthawk Wired is faster than the wireless

  I currently use a Nighthawk R7000 and after the speed test internet using speedtest.net, I found that a desktop computer that is connected directly with ethernet is more than 100 Mbps faster than a wireless laptop which is the only room away from the router (wired office gets 140 ~-~ 160 Mbit/s, while the laptop is ~ 30-40 ~ Mbps). Any help would be great.

  Thanks to all who tried to help, but he had a friend IT of my father who came and said: it's a certain chip (or something of the kind) in my computer that was wrong, so we got a Linksys adapter Max - Stream AC600 WiFi Micro USB. I can now get 90 Mbits/s download. Thanks again for everyone's help.

• The problems of performance - query on a copy of a table is faster than the orig

  Hi all
  
  I have problems with a specific table (select) sql performance (costs 7800) (Oracle 10.2.0.4.0, Linux).
  
  Then I copied the table 1:1 (same structure, the same data, the same indexes, etc.) within the same domain (, the user database, tablespace etc.) and gathered the table_stats with the same settings. The same query on the copied table is faster and costs are only 3600.
  
  Gods sake why is the query on this new table faster?
  
  I appreciate any idea.
  
  Thank you!
  
  FIBO
  
  Edited by: user954903 the 13.01.2010 04:23

  alter table t enable row movement;
  alter table t shrink space;
  alter table t disable row movement;
  

• In addition to making video is the most powerful 60 d or faster than the 50 d.

  I have a 50 d is there one reason other than the ability to make the video to purchase a 60 d.

  Canon made a large step backward with the 60 d, I agree with other posters.

  The articulated screen is nice for video, but really not so valuable to the shooting yet. In fact, I consider the rebel T5i to be upper-middle to the 60 d and which is reflected in the price of these two bodies ($700 for a 60 d) and $850 for a T5i.  Don't 'upgrade' to the 60 d.  The next update of the 60 d is now the 7 d, which is a fine camera.

  Canon seems to work in three directions: creation less expensive cameras full frame (6 d vs 5DIII), the upgrade of the rebels as well as a transfer line which was the 40 d, 50 d to the 7 d product line.  I think the 60 d will be the last body "double-digit".  In fact, the EOS - M has the same internals as the T5i but in a small body.

  For everyone (except the 60 d

• What can I do if the script runs faster than the network?

  I wrote a script between applications moving to InDesign, where he begins to AppleScript, to Photoshop, which AppleScript runs a JavaScript script to perform various tasks.

  It works beautifully on my laptop at home where I do my development. Yesterday, using me as a Guinea pig, I tried it in the office.

  On the third round, I was horrified to see the ExtendScript Toolkit pop up with an error message (about as welcome to see an AppleScript script, asking the user to open the Script Editor and fix a script).

  The error message was that app.bringToFront (); was not a valid function.

  This was the case in InDesign, which has a different activation function, and I realized that, even if my AppleScript called Photoshop activate, I was still in InDesign.

  The app.bringToFront JavaScript was so called because I had joined my code in the model of Tranberry.

  So I pressed the button stop on ExtendScript, returned to InDesign and represented the script. This time he worked as usual.

  Occasionally on our network we spend some time beachball - watch as a communication happens in the background. So I guess the time wherever the error was thrown was on one of these downturns in the network.

  The passage of InDesign, Photoshop is not happening pretty fast, but the script has run and has issued an order Photoshop JavaScript while I was still in InDesign.

  In AppleScript this unhappy communication with users can be avoided using blocks '... try error'.

  Is there an equivalent of the error handling in JavaScript that would allow me to avoid being tossed in the ExtendScript Toolkit and give them a friendly message to apologize, explaining what had happened and inviting them to try again?

  JavaScript has try/catch blocks

  try {}

  app.bringToFront ();

  } catch (e) {}

  error handling code

  }

  Or you might be able to use an if statement

  If (app == 'photoshop') {}

  app.bringToFront ();

  } else {}

  app handle not photoshop

  }

• Using copyTo to copy the Sqlite database file to the directory of the user

  I am trying to copy my database Sqlite directory of private enforcement directory of documents accessible to the user. Here is my code:

  // closing db connection
  dbConnection.close();
  // clearing the db file variable
  dbFile = null;
  
  // new handle on the same db file
  dbFile = File.applicationStorageDirectory.resolvePath("mydb.db");
  // copy to documents directory
  dbFile.copyTo(File.documentsDirectory);
  

  When I try to run the code on the device, I get:

  There is an example on the Adobe AIR help page:

  original var = air. File.documentsDirectory.resolvePath ("AIR Test/test.txt");

  newFile var = air. File.documentsDirectory.resolvePath ("AIR Test/copy.txt");

  original.copyTo (newFile, true); true means crushes!

  Therefore, specify the new file name too not only the directory.

• RAM being faster than the normal cache?

  

  Hi, I have an AMD FX 6300 with 8 GB of DDR3 RAM.
  generally, it will take about 3 days to be over before it starts caching all memory to free memory 0

  Now, after turning on my computer after about 40 minutes, he used all of the physical memory, so everything is new I load takes forever. I'm only under firefox and several games, the same thing I did. Nothing different. What is the Cause of this and how it stop eating my memory so fast? Help, please.
  See the image to the title of the physical memory usage... 'Free '.
  Normally, it would take 3 days before I have to restart, but even without loading any program I saw him up very fast

  

  JR

  In your second snip you 5721 'available. '  Free memory space is not relevant and not the cuase of your slow descent.  I suspect it's your IMVUCLient it uses currently ~ 675 MB.

  First of all I run malwarebytes and if that comes back clean run WPR.

  Please download the free version of Malwarebytes.
  Update immediately.
  Do a full scan of the system
  Let us know the results at the end.

  http://www.Malwarebytes.org/products

  In order to diagnose your problem, you will need to download and install below

  Install the WPT (windows Performance Toolkit)

  http://www.Microsoft.com/en-US/Download/details.aspx?ID=30652

  (If necessary) installation help is here

  When you have, open a command prompt and type the following command

  WPRUI.exe (which is the performance of windows recorder) and check the following boxes:

  First triage level (if available), CPU utilization, disk i/o.

  If your problem is not CPU or HD and then check the box/Member States concerned as well (for example, networking or register) configure your as in the snip below

  

  Click Start

  Let it run for 60 seconds or more, and save the file (it will show you where it is registered and to what is called the file)

  The file zip and upload it to us on Onedrive (or any file sharing service) and give us a link to it in your next post.

• Adobe Premiere Pro video faster than the Audio

  Hello

  I recently recorded a video using fraps (Audio and video in the same file), then turned into an mp4 format. I watched the video and everything was fine. I then put this video in Premiere Pro and they set off together, but at the end of the video, they have 20 seconds apart. I tried with other files and it's the same thing

  Does anyone know whats causing this and how to fix it?

  Thank you

  NeonBro_

  look in your first > preferences > audio hardware > input device

  I paste link to similar thread with Fraps game about speed rear Re: imported too fast music & video games

• IMac will perform faster than the Mac mini when exporting video files in Apple Compressor?

  I want to export 3-8 hours long videos using Apple Compressor in 720 p, 3 per day.

  I intend to use Final Cut Pro X.

  Simple slide shows with music. Like this:

  https://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=tGQAqHkyKGw

  
  

  Mac Mini end of 2012: Processor: Core i7 clocked at 2.6 GHz; RAM: 16 GB; Video card:

  HD 4000, 512 MB graphics card;

  iMac plug end of 2015: Processor: Core i5 2.8 GHz; RAM: 16 GB; Video card:

  IRIS Pro 6200, 1.7 GB;

  The SSD is the same.

  Thanks for your replies!

  Download GeekBench and look over the results of tests to find out. Not enough information provided and without tests side by side of each configuration, it's almost an impossible question to answer definitively.

  The SSD used by Apple in a Mini 2012 is not necessarily the same brand and model from the one used in an iMac of 2015. Then there is a dual-core or quad-core i7 in the Mini. iMacs usually had the quad-core processors, I think.