Prevent some users from connecting
Is there an easy way to prevent users from my LDAP directory with a special connection to the CMC role? Or would need a custom for this component?
If this is not the case, is it possible that I can remove the role 'authenticated' of these users? I looked at maps of credentials, but does not know how to remove a role with a card.
"authenticated" by itself really means little, this role does not have the permissions set in COE out of the box. By default, users are granted the role of "guest", who has read access to the security group 'Public '. Remove this 'guest' read permission would allow a connection, but no access to anything other than an error page. Simply connected usually isn't a problem, it is usually more what a user can access once logged. This is where a user roles has become important.
In my opinion, the simplest method is to set the provider LDAP to examine a certain OU to its users and include only users in this ORGANIZATIONAL unit that will use COE. This suggestion is based on the information at hand. If you use the portal, SOA, etc. in the same domain, this approach is perhaps not possible
Tags: Fusion Middleware
Similar Questions
-
Any creative ways to prevent some users from always using the console?
Our Organization strives to encourage people to use RDP to access servers, but also provides the use of the console as a backup. We want users to use the console as sparingly as possible. Any suggestions on ways that allow the use of the console but make sure users will choose RDP on the console? Perhaps bringing to logout the user after a period of time?
My first reaction is of course the sharks with laser beams on their heads but I don't understand how this can cause logistical and budgetary problems. My second idea would be to only allow access to the consoles of a jumpbox they also RDP. So I guess that users would acquiesce to all RDP'ing to the box, that they wanted to administer anyway rather than the double jump, but give them the Console in case there was a situation of emergency or clear need.
-
How to prevent the user from creating jobs
Hello
We need to prevent the user from creating jobs on a dev environment. It's a 10.2.0.4 standard database on 64-bit linux.
Their scheme has only connect and resource roles. Is it possible to prevent them from creating jobs? 11 g, it's permission to CREATE a TASK, but I don't know how I can do this in 10g.
Thanks for all the ideas!I try again...
If you revoke execute privilege on DBMS_JOB package with 'regular' users (i.e. non admin), then they will not be able to do anything, including by creating with the SUBMISSION process.
No you want?
-
Hello
: Is thr possible to prevent a user to perform the DML operationHello
LOCK TABLE tablename in EXCLUSIVE MODE;
We can use this to prevent a user from some time handling
If you want that the user don't not to access permanently to revoke the privileges of this user.
-
Prevent the user from uninstalling the application
Hi friends I want to prevent the user from uninstalling the application on my mobile phone blackberry if I give how do I do it and how to fix this inaccessblity thanks to programming, I mean putting prevention in the form of mobile etc.
BES policies can ensure that an application is not deleted. Sorry should have mentioned that.
Installation of OS 5, I've mentioned is:
CodeModuleListener
This will get called when a module is removed or marked for deletion. Code here could probably try to download and re - install an application removed, however, it is a signed interface, so I'm sure that RIM could quickly find developers who have tried to use this interface for dubious means.
You are however correct Ted, because it won't stop someone wiping their Blackberry. In addition, if you remove the application that would be re - install itself, then it's history anyway.
I think that the advantages of using this method to tidy, after a deletion (for example delete associated files on the SD card) makes a worthwhile addition to the API.
-
Prevent the user from changing the page in URL - Apex 5
Dear community of Apex,
We seek to protect our handling of URL pages. The protection of session state is enabled, and each page has page value «Arguments must have Checksum» access protection However, the documentation seems to discuss in order to prevent the user from element values in the URL. We want to prevent the user to change the page ID in the URL. Currently, a user is able to hack the URL and take in the middle of a wizard process for example. Is it possible to stop this? Other that an element of creative previous train stop check.
* Version: Application Express 5.0.1.00.06
Thank you
Barry
bSamuel wrote:
We seek to protect our handling of URL pages. The protection of session state is enabled, and each page has page value «Arguments must have Checksum» access protection However, the documentation seems to discuss in order to prevent the user from element values in the URL. We want to prevent the user to change the page ID in the URL. Currently, a user is able to hack the URL and take in the middle of a wizard process for example. Is it possible to stop this? Other that an element of creative previous train stop check.
Hi Barry
Affecting the security attribute Access Page Protection page No. URL Access and navigate between pages using the type of the Page Management Branch (uncheck the option creates a branch using redirection page in the Wizard) will avoid this:
No URL access -Page can not be found using a URL, but the page can be the target of a type of Page Management Branch, is not doing a URL redirect.
It is a little more restrictive that a normal direction of the session state values cannot be positioned or erased declaratively in the branch, but is not often necessary in a several step wizard, and it's pretty simple to work round using prior processes - or post-branche or by referencing the item values directly from other pages.
-
Prevent a user from changing the ID of project in P6 EPPM 8.3.7
Anyone know if there is a Global privilege or project security profile that prevents a user from changing the project on an existing project ID? We use Primavera P6 EPPM 8.3.7
Thank you
Eric
Hello
Security of the project profile below can help you
Change the details of the project with the exception of costs / Financials
Determines if the profile will allow users to modify fields in general tabs, Dates, default values, resources, and settings of the project details. To assign a project of baselines, users must also have the privilege of project 'assign the planning of project"assigned to their profile.
Kind regards
Marcos
-
Progress bar - prevent the user from moving forward
Adobe Captivate 9
Is it possible to prevent a user from moving the progress bar? I like including the progress bar, so that users know their progress but do not want to make them to move anyway.
Any ideas?
The easiest (only for HTML output) using the new widget from CpExtra of InfoSemantics. It has many more features that can be very useful, but it is not free:
-
How to limit some users from a group of tunnel with access hours
I created under ldap attribute-map and applied to the AD server used for authentication. Then created the beach hourly and applied to group policy.
In ad server for users who need access to the VPN only during office hours, I put "OfficeHours" value in the field office. However, for users who need access to the vpn for 24 hours, I left this field empty.
Now, only users with the "OfficeHours" value in the field of the Office are to connect in the specified time interval. However other users never connect. How can I solve this problem?
LDAP attribute-map AccessHours_LDAPMAP
name of the map msNPAllowDialin Tunneling protocols
msNPAllowDialin card-value FALSE 1
map-value msNPAllowDialin 20 TRUE
physicalDeliveryOfficeName access-hours card name
time-range OfficeHours
periodical Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Saturday Sunday from 08:30 to 18:00
attributes of Group Policy GroupPolicy_employees.domain.com
WINS server no
4.2.2.2 DNS server value
VPN-access-hour value OfficeHours
client ssl-VPN-tunnel-Protocol ikev2
by default no
WebVPN
AnyConnect value domain.com_client_profile type user profiles
Thank you, Rachel.
The soultion you suggest works.
Thank you for taking the time to solve this problem.
Concerning
Harvinder
-
Empty field prevents the user to connect
Good afternoon
How to prevent a user to digitally sign the document if there is a blank field.
The issue I'm having is that the digital signature line appears. When the user connects, the document is saved. After you run, my java code running the signature of compensation.
The thing is that we have a document saved with a signature in there.
Is it possible that I can have a JavaScript to prevent the digital signature line if a field is empty?
You must place the entire code after 'else' braces, as
you have done with the code after the if statement.
-
Prevent the user from printing and see some pages
Here is the scenerio:
The form has 4 pages. I want only the user to see and know about page 1.
I need to batch print the other 3 pages, each page in a separate batch
Here is what I tried and the question resulting:
1 format pages 2,3,4 as visible print only
a. the user may say there are 3 other pages - they appear in white
b. the user may see them if they decide to print
2 format pages 2,3,4 as visible print only and restrict printing to the user
a. I can't print without having to open each one with a password - works well with printing of lots per page
3 format pages as hidden 2,3,4 - the user cannot tell or see the other 3 pages but:
a. I can't print the pages
3 format pages 2,3,4 as hidden and have the form submitted as xml and import them into the complete PDF
a. There are fields that are changed dyamically based on the selection of the user (ie. selection of fonts), so that the xml import does not work for this
Any ideas on how to "get my cake and eat it too."
Hello
You could try a hidden field that seeks the username «»
There are security problems, and the script has to be in a position of trust. You can make this place a Javascript file inside the Acrobat folder. The penalty usually with trusted fuctions is that you must send to each user a copy of the js file and it should also put it in the appropriate folder.
In your case is not a problem, because you only want the js file on your computer and do not need to distribute it to others.
When you put the (downloaded) file in Acrobat / folder Javascript, Acrobat will load it automatically.
In Acrobat, make sure that you have defined a 'name' in Edition / Preferences / Identity tab:
When you open the PDF document, your user name will be on the field. This only happens if the js file is loaded in the correct folder on the computer that you are using.
Once it's working, it's a simple step to include an if statement in the textfield, after the script located in the initialize event:
If (this.rawValue == "lfalke") / / or whatever your username is set on...
{
Page2.presence = "visible";
page3. Presence = "visible";
page4. Presence = "visible";
}
on the other
{
Page2.presence = 'hidden ';
page3. Presence = "hidden";
page4. Presence = "hidden";
}
This means that the visibility of the three pages would be automatic. User with the js file AND your username could see pages 2-4, everyone would not see these pages.
I know it's a little complicated, but once put in place it should continue to work OK.
Hope that helps,
Niall
-
I tried to restrict a program like already said, but I messed up with the gpedit.msc, now all but one program is limited to me and I tired to go back to the gpedit.msc but it is too limited. I currently use Windows 7 Ultimate 32 bit version.
Thanks for your advice, but I'll just format my hard drive and reinstall Windows. Thank you very much however.
-
How to prevent a user from opening multiple instances on the same computer?
On site oldnavyweekly.com , there is a .swf which prevents users to open multiple instances of the site at the same time on the same computer. If you open the site and try to open it again in another window, it will not load. Cannot open the site again until the first window is closed. How did they implement this?My analysis, that is NOT:
1. cookies - the block always takes place if you try to open it in Internet Explorer and also try to open it in Firefox at the same time.
2 flash Cookies - the block always takes place if I disable flash cookies.
3 IP Based Block - you are not blocked if you open the site on two separate computers with the same outgoing IP address. From my analysis, their server does not help in the block at all.It seems as if their .swf creates a sort of object throughout the global system which can be detected in other instances of the application on the same computer. How did they implement this?Thank you!use localconnection. everyone has a localconnection to send and a receiving localconnection. the lc reception closes the current application.
-
process of splwow64.exe which prevents other users from printing
Windows 2008 server 64-bit - on remote desktop, printing of the 32-bit application as a "modular" user, the splwow64.exe process opens and the job is printed application. Once the splwow64.exe process opens for the user "modular", logging as long as another user to the 'mistest' application, the user cannot print from the 32-bit application. Only when I end the splwow64.exe for the "modular" user process the user "mistest" will be able to print and then the splwow64.exe process left to the user "mistest".
I found the Microsoft Article 2513330 and implemented the splwow64.exe registry key with a value of 0 in HEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Terminal Server\Sysprocs and then restarted the server.
The registry setting has not solved the problem - the splwow64.exe process remains still open. Microsoft has a solution to automatically close the splwow64.exe process after the print job is finished?
Thank you
Albert
Hi Albertmis,
The question you have posted is better suited in the TechNet Forums. Please see the following link for more information.
-
How to prevent standard users from access to certain folders?
I use Windows vista Ultimate OS, and I have two users on my laptop namely, administrator and Standard user.
I don't want the standard user to see some of my personal records.Please help me, how can I do this. ???Password protect your account. Users can log on their but yours is inaccessible to them.
Go to start and click the icon at the top right which will take you to user accounts.
Click on create a password for your account.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Accidentally uninstalled something, now disabled modules, Firefox 3.6.28
I was recently a few cleaning of old programs, I no longer use via Control Panel > Add/Remove Programs (Windows XP), and subsequently my modules suddenly stopped working. It didn't say whether they are disabled or anything, but it's like I've all dis
-
My motherboard went bad on my old computer, but the hard drive was OK. I bought a new computer and plugged my old hard drive to it via a usb adapter. I would like to import or copy my favorites from the old hard drive to my new, but I can't find wher
-
my screen has vertical white line about 1.5 inches what casuses it and what I can do
the computer works fine, but the vertical line on the screen about 1.5 inch on the left side does not go away making it and can it be fixed
-
Hamachi does not work with Windows 7 Pro/64
Hello I am trying to install the latest version of Hamachi on Windows 7pro/64. But when I click on the networking... it says no internet access? I already put it as home, still no change... I find this problem when I was trying to ping my friend... I
-
Hello I have a very simple question, but in this forum at the moment, I have not found an answer. I just want to know the maximum capacity in LINEAR 2 of the Media Hub NMH300 mode. For example: with 2 hard drives WD 2 TB, I use 4 TB within the LINEAR