How to prevent the user from creating jobs

Hello

We need to prevent the user from creating jobs on a dev environment. It's a 10.2.0.4 standard database on 64-bit linux.

Their scheme has only connect and resource roles. Is it possible to prevent them from creating jobs? 11 g, it's permission to CREATE a TASK, but I don't know how I can do this in 10g.

Thanks for all the ideas!

I try again...

If you revoke execute privilege on DBMS_JOB package with 'regular' users (i.e. non admin), then they will not be able to do anything, including by creating with the SUBMISSION process.

No you want?

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • How to prevent the user to create the 'analysis' and 'dashboard '?

    We have a requirement that is to restrict the user create new 'analysis' and 'dashboard '. As we know when the connection ' host: port / analytical, in the top of the page there is a drop down list of 'New' where users can create new 'analysis' and 'Dashboard', how to set up the privilege to disable the option 'Analysis' and 'dashboard '?

    OBIEE version: Oracle Business Intelligence 11.1.1.7.0

    Thank you
    Jinbo

    Summary:

    1 set the "New Menu" permission in the 'home page and Header' refusal, then the 'New' menu will disappear from the top right of the page, which prevents the user to create dashboards and new anlysis

    2. in order to not allow the user to modify the catalog, set the permission of "access user interface of the catalogue"in the ' welcome and header' to refuse."

    3. even made 1 and 2, we have always have a path that the user can create new report, it's "House"menu." To avoid this, our method is to set the explicit right to catalog for the application role.

    Thank you
    Jinbo

  • Prevent the user from uninstalling the application

    Hi friends I want to prevent the user from uninstalling the application on my mobile phone blackberry if I give how do I do it and how to fix this inaccessblity thanks to programming, I mean putting prevention in the form of mobile etc.

    BES policies can ensure that an application is not deleted.  Sorry should have mentioned that.

    Installation of OS 5, I've mentioned is:

    CodeModuleListener

    This will get called when a module is removed or marked for deletion.  Code here could probably try to download and re - install an application removed, however, it is a signed interface, so I'm sure that RIM could quickly find developers who have tried to use this interface for dubious means.

    You are however correct Ted, because it won't stop someone wiping their Blackberry.  In addition, if you remove the application that would be re - install itself, then it's history anyway.

    I think that the advantages of using this method to tidy, after a deletion (for example delete associated files on the SD card) makes a worthwhile addition to the API.

  • Prevent the user from changing the page in URL - Apex 5

    Dear community of Apex,

    We seek to protect our handling of URL pages.  The protection of session state is enabled, and each page has page value «Arguments must have Checksum» access protection  However, the documentation seems to discuss in order to prevent the user from element values in the URL.  We want to prevent the user to change the page ID in the URL.  Currently, a user is able to hack the URL and take in the middle of a wizard process for example.  Is it possible to stop this?  Other that an element of creative previous train stop check.

    * Version: Application Express 5.0.1.00.06

    Thank you

    Barry

    bSamuel wrote:

    We seek to protect our handling of URL pages.  The protection of session state is enabled, and each page has page value «Arguments must have Checksum» access protection  However, the documentation seems to discuss in order to prevent the user from element values in the URL.  We want to prevent the user to change the page ID in the URL.  Currently, a user is able to hack the URL and take in the middle of a wizard process for example.  Is it possible to stop this?  Other that an element of creative previous train stop check.

    Hi Barry

    Affecting the security attribute Access Page Protection page No. URL Access and navigate between pages using the type of the Page Management Branch (uncheck the option creates a branch using redirection page in the Wizard) will avoid this:

    No URL access -Page can not be found using a URL, but the page can be the target of a type of Page Management Branch, is not doing a URL redirect.

    It is a little more restrictive that a normal direction of the session state values cannot be positioned or erased declaratively in the branch, but is not often necessary in a several step wizard, and it's pretty simple to work round using prior processes - or post-branche or by referencing the item values directly from other pages.

  • How to prevent the user open and play a flash game on multiple browser windows at the same time?

    Hi guys,.

    I made a game as the same site: http://www.Netent.com/games/table-games/Texas-Holdem-Pro-series/

    Anyone know how to prevent the user opened and play the game on multiple windows browser both?

    I used the command of flash to embed flash into a page aspx and connection to sql server

    Someone help me, please.

    p/s: Sorry, my English is not good

    You can use localconnection.

  • How do you keep users from creating directories deeper than 260 characters of the root of the drive?

    In Windows, it seems impossible to create/join the files with a path longer than 260 characters.

    Well, not completely: you can create these files if you create a shortcut or point a reader shared inside the path, but that's exactly how this problem gets so bad: a user creates a share X: pointing to \\myserver\longdirname\evenlongerdirname\verylongdirname\etc\verylongfilename

    then it creates a file in X:\evenlongerdirnamethanYouHaveEverSeen\SuperLongDirNameJustLongEnoughToBe260FromTheRoot

    Note: the names of directories must be long, you can also create a shorter longer string of names of directories (a\b\c\d\e\f\g...)

    now, someone trying to open this file of \\myserver fail miserable. In fact, windows behaves a bit ridiculous and sometimes silently ignores files. I've seen this happen when people copy a folder of installation deep inside a fileshare: the installation program is a DVD or CD and a subscription contains 1000 directories, some are more than 260 tank when opened from the root. Then you get really weird behaviour: files ignored!

    As 260 characters was probably very well when the disks were<10GB but="" if="" you="" have="" 1="" tb="" drive,="" it's="" not="" too="" hard="" to="" end="" up="" with="" directories="" that="" are="" way="" deeper="" than="" 260="" characters.="" so="" i="" predict="" that="" there="" will="" be="" a="" time="" soon="" where="" ntfs="" needs="" to="" be="" adapted="" to="" be="" able="" to="" use="" large="" disks="" decently.="" this="" is="" also="" made="" worse="" because="" people="" create="" files="" with="" really="" bad="" names="" (e.g.="" a="" outlook="" msg="" files="" will="" be="" called="" the="" same="" as="" its="" subject="" line,="" fun="">

    Don't tell people don't do that, I see it in my everyday environment, and it breaks a lot of programs (and then the bad programmer is blamed for drawback of Windows: "you can't even open a file named a.txt")

    Question: How do you keep the users to create a file that is > 260 characters if we take into account the root of the drive, rather than a part under?

    Hi PM3.141592
     
    Your question of Windows is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public.
     

    Please ask your question in the Forums Pro Windows XP IT.

  • How to remove the user from the IOM by using Trusted Recon

    We trust Sun to IOM LDAP Recon. We delete usually old Sun LDAP users periodically. According to the requirement, these users should also be eliminated from IOM as well as all its databases that are put into service.

    Looks like that, the behavior by default of 'iPlanet Trusted remove user Recon Task' is to set the user status to 'Deleted' and 'Revoked' about the users corresponding IOM and resources put into service. How can I remove users from the IOM as well as the database placed in service in the case of user removed from Sun's LDAP?

    Thank you!
    Kabi

    Once a user is created in the IOM, you cannot remove it. As you said, the default behavior for the removal of the recon user approved is that the user will be disabled in IOM and revoked from all target applications. Revoke the user will remove the user from the target applications.

    This is done for the purpose of audit so that later we can determine which users have been removed or terminated.

    But as a you can manually delete the records of user database directly which is not recommended.

  • Progress bar - prevent the user from moving forward

    Adobe Captivate 9

    Is it possible to prevent a user from moving the progress bar?  I like including the progress bar, so that users know their progress but do not want to make them to move anyway.

    Any ideas?

    The easiest (only for HTML output) using the new widget from CpExtra of InfoSemantics. It has many more features that can be very useful, but it is not free:

    Introduction to CpExtra | Infosemantics Pty Ltd

  • How to prevent limited users to create virtual machines?

    Hi all;

    Is it possible to prevent standard users to create Virtual Machines in Microsoft Windows environment?

    Thank you

    Here's the problem I see... as long as the user has the ability to run VMware Workstation, you can't stop creating a VM since everything it takes, it's a TextEditor and a live ISO Image and the other can create a configuration manually, .vmx file that it points to the ISO Image and then double click on the manually created configuration .vmx file and its place and running.  Of course not all users would go to the trouble to create the .vmx file manually but there are scripts on the Internet that do and users have other ways too.

    If you don't have the appropriate infrastructure to control your users then monitor their activities and let them know him will be fired if they contravene the regulations.

  • How to prevent any user to create any folder sharing, even if the user has admin rights?

    I'm managing a domain controller with Windows Server 2008 R2. My requirement is to restrict any user in the domain to create any file sharing, although they have administrator rights. I want to achieve this through Group Policy. Help, please. Only the delegate user can have access to create the shared folder.

    Please suggest.

    This issue is beyond the scope of this site and must be placed on Technet or MSDN
  • Prevent the user from type sms or email until the application runs

    Hi all

    I want to make a request. Until the application is running can not the user able to type anything in the application as well as the native application means write sms or e-mail.

    I have replace the keyChar() method. She works in application. Now I am not able to type any char in my application, but I am still able to type any message or an e-mail. Application runs in the background.

    Can anyone how I can achieve this?

    Thank you

    Neeraj Chauhan

    you are not able to intercept keystrokes to other applications.

  • How to remove the user from the role in esx

    I use single ESXi host. I assigned a user to the role named 'L1 team'. Now, I want to remove this user from this team. And I don't want to give any role.

    I deleted the user directly, still under the role of the team of L1, the user has been shown.

    Unfortunately deleting a user does not remove this username of the previously assigned permissions too. What you need to do is to open the 'Permissions' tab for the host and delete the UserID from there too.

    André

  • Prevent the user from printing and see some pages

    Here is the scenerio:

    The form has 4 pages.  I want only the user to see and know about page 1.

    I need to batch print the other 3 pages, each page in a separate batch

    Here is what I tried and the question resulting:

    1 format pages 2,3,4 as visible print only

    a. the user may say there are 3 other pages - they appear in white

    b. the user may see them if they decide to print

    2 format pages 2,3,4 as visible print only and restrict printing to the user

    a. I can't print without having to open each one with a password - works well with printing of lots per page

    3 format pages as hidden 2,3,4 - the user cannot tell or see the other 3 pages but:

    a. I can't print the pages

    3 format pages 2,3,4 as hidden and have the form submitted as xml and import them into the complete PDF

    a. There are fields that are changed dyamically based on the selection of the user (ie. selection of fonts), so that the xml import does not work for this

    Any ideas on how to "get my cake and eat it too."

    Hello

    You could try a hidden field that seeks the username «»

    There are security problems, and the script has to be in a position of trust. You can make this place a Javascript file inside the Acrobat folder. The penalty usually with trusted fuctions is that you must send to each user a copy of the js file and it should also put it in the appropriate folder.

    In your case is not a problem, because you only want the js file on your computer and do not need to distribute it to others.

    When you put the (downloaded) file in Acrobat / folder Javascript, Acrobat will load it automatically.

    In Acrobat, make sure that you have defined a 'name' in Edition / Preferences / Identity tab:

    When you open the PDF document, your user name will be on the field. This only happens if the js file is loaded in the correct folder on the computer that you are using.

    Once it's working, it's a simple step to include an if statement in the textfield, after the script located in the initialize event:

    If (this.rawValue == "lfalke") / / or whatever your username is set on...

    {

    Page2.presence = "visible";

    page3. Presence = "visible";

    page4. Presence = "visible";

    }

    on the other

    {

    Page2.presence = 'hidden ';

    page3. Presence = "hidden";

    page4. Presence = "hidden";

    }

    This means that the visibility of the three pages would be automatic. User with the js file AND your username could see pages 2-4, everyone would not see these pages.

    I know it's a little complicated, but once put in place it should continue to work OK.

    Hope that helps,

    Niall

  • Maximum width on a text box does not prevent the user from typing too

    I have a text box with the field of the item to a width of 100, a maximum width of 240 and a height of 5. A user can type more than 240 characters on the screen (it does not seem to cut at any time) and then when they run they get an error of area too long given that the DB has only 240 tanks. (they can also copy and paste more than 240 characters here too)

    Is there anything else I need to do to make the field stop accepting characters after 240? I know I can cut the field before you save it in order to prevent the error, but want it so that the user can just walk more than they should.

    APEX 3.1, oracle 10g.

    Hi mimi,

    Make a "* Textarea character counter with *" rather than a normal text box. It will then work. If you want you can even use ' Textarea character Counter and check the spelling.

    Watch Ben always overload things: P

    Mike

  • Prevent the user from interacting with the control

    I have a plan I want to "lock".  I don't want the user to be able to zoom or scroll the map at all, I tried touchEvents ignorant, but who has not worked for me.

    Any thoughts?

    In this case, I would usually throw in an "overlay" object, so it appears above the element in question (a simple way is to use a DockLayout and make sure the second element is defined after the first element, resulting in a higher position in the Z-order) in layers. The purpose of recovery would intercept activities of users and basically throw it out.

    According to the provision in question, however, it is probably easier to use the touchPropagationMode property VisualNode: https://developer.blackberry.com/native/reference/cascades/bb__cascades__visualnode.html#property-to... on the article in question, or its parent.

Maybe you are looking for