Problem PCI 4351

Hello

When I try to use a pci card 4351 for thermocouple with dasylab and nidaq driver, I have 3 problems:

-first of all, when I used the module of scale to use with thermocouple, I disable it compensation CYC, is possible to solve that?

-the second is when I record with this card for a long time, I have a lag (+ 2 hours to 2 days) in the Terminal. Is it possible to fix this?

-third, I ask at OR, if it is possible to use this card with driver Nidaqmx or develop daqmx driver for this card very useful.

Thank you for your answers

Moldy,

It's to the Max, in the area of data. Click on "Create New" and select the traditional virtual of NOR-DAQ channel.

Tags: NI Products

Similar Questions

  • Can I still use my PCI-4351 for readings of tc type t, even if the unit is out of tolerance in the +/-2 .5V range?

    Hello

    I use a PCI-4351 for readings of TC type T, and after receiving it back from calibration, the 2.5V range came out by - 0.00003 V.  The rest of the calibration is within the tolerance.  Please tell us if the 2.5V range is used for playback of the thermocouple type T with the accessory CB - 68 t.  From my understanding, I don't think that the 0.625V beach is used for measurements of TC, and they all calibration.

    Thank you for your help.

    Michael Carter

    Hi Michael,

    You're right that you'll only need the gamme.625 for this measure.

    I am very disappointed to hear that your device was not properly calibrated.  It was our calibration?  If it were, I can try to you allow to send to us or something like that to remedy this situation.

    If there is anything else I can do to help correct this problem please let me know.

  • PCI-4351 and what version of labview?

    I have a Board of 24-bit AI NI PCI 4351 that I am tring to use with Labview 2009 on Win XP with 7.44 DAQ. Whenever I have a vl of the 4351 on the block diagram, I get an error message indicating that this vi is old to be converted to this version of Labview.

    So I guess my question is, "what is the latest version of Labview to be compatible with the PCI4351 on Win XP and 7.44 DAQ card?"

    It is clear that these VI have been created in LabVIEW 5. In order to open this VI LabVIEW 2009 you will need to register in an intermediate version of LabVIEW (LabVIEW 6 or higher). You can check it out on the table in the link below.

    How to change to different version of LabVIEW VI: http://www.ni.com/tutorial/8387/en/

    There is a forum of OR which allows display of VI and other users to convert for you, see the link below.

    Conversion of the VI Version: http://forums.ni.com/t5/Version-Conversion/bd-p/VersionConversion

    -Will.i.am10

  • TS140 Problem PCIE

    Hello

    I just bought aTS140 with the idea of setting up as a media server. The problem is that the system is not finding my PCIe TV card - it is a map of the SCT 6984.

    I tried to install the drivers manually, but he said that the card does not start, I also tried to put into service to different PCIe ports, but nothing seems to work.

    Any advice would be appreciated.

    Neil

    Hello

    It seems that the card is not recognized by the system BIOS. The card you describe has not been validated on the TS140 and I don't know that the 'TV' cards have been so I can't tell you for certain if this card (or another card) would work or not, unfortunately.

  • Problem PCI-e Vostro 200

    Hi, as stated I have a Vostro 200 Slim I bought an Asus EAH3450 PCI - e low profile card works fine on another computer, the Vostro I don't get any video, if I change the VGA conector for the video shipped with the computer on a screen saying I need to unplug this cable and connect it to the new card, which is what I've done , its like onboard video can detect the monitor, even if it is not plugged in, any ideas? TIA

    I found a solution. Well well, for the Vostro 220, but I think this would work for your question. Access to my computer and right click - Select Manager. Expand graphics cards and click right then on the first, and then select Disable. Mine is an Intel (not sure of the model specofoc). Then restart the PC with the VGA or DVI cable connected to the Nvidia card. You can check the BIOS to see if you have PCI-express card enabled at startup. It was under my chipset in advance options. Then install the Nvidia drivers if they have not been installed. I have a Nvidia Quad PCI-e 290 and did it with a 280 PCI. I don't have this problem with Vostro that I did this with HP and was easy plug-and-play, the driver installation. After the reboot, change your graphics options through Nvidia Control Panel. I hope this helps.

  • ProBook 440 G2: Problem PCI

    I require support for the PCI controller
    

    Hello:

    Install the driver Intel Chipset Installation Utility and reboot.

    The second listed file is the auto install file.

    https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/20775/Intel-Chipset-Device-Software-INF-Update-Utility-

  • There are Linux drivers for the 4351?


    Hello Mike,.

    No we do not have a driver that supports the PCI-4351 on a Linux system. The drivers current DAQ for Linux is

    NOR-DAQmx Version 8.0 for Linux

    NOR-DAQmx Base Version 2.1 for Linux

    In the readme.txt file, you will find information on all the different hardware that is supported by the driver. The PCI-4351 is not there.

    Another resource to check the compatibility of the driver is to go to the acquisition devices data (DAQ) Installation/Configuration Troubleshooting - Support of the Driver NOR-DAQ.

    I hope that this information helps you with your application.

    Kind regards
    Sandra T.

    Sales engineer | National Instruments

  • Duty cycle issues update

    I use a counter that is generated by a PCI-6110 to switch a relay to solid state that enables or disables a heating unit. I update the duty cycle based on the output of a PID controller (0 - 100 output of PID VI gets scaled to a cycle of 0.001 to 0.99). The question is after two iterations, the written property node is no longer the output of PID on the scale to the task and it seems 0 as the default value.

    Many meter generation examples use event structures to detect a change in the duty cycle and pass that to the task. But structures event detect changes in values if the value is written in a local variable and not typed in a CNC? I feel that the answer should be 'Yes'... but in the case I tested it seems to be 'no '.

    Don't adjust the precision of a digital indicator / control limits the number of significant digits does a calculation? I would limit my duty cycle to 2 decimal places - i.e. 0.3342 and 0,3313 the two would be 0.33. In this way the cycle is not unnecessarily updated.

    The temperature is read by a PCI-4351... which may arise under? blocks if you have not installed the drivers.

    arcranda wrote:

    Many meter generation examples use event structures to detect a change in the duty cycle and pass that to the task. But structures event detect changes in values if the value is written in a local variable and not typed in a digital control?.

    To have a triggered event when a value is changed programmatically, create a Value property node (signaling) and the new value of wire to it.  This will trigger a change of value for this variable event.

    arcranda wrote:

    Don't adjust the precision of a digital indicator / control limits the number of significant digits does a calculation? I would limit my duty cycle to 2 decimal places - i.e. 0.3342 and 0,3313 the two would be 0.33. In this way the cycle is not unnecessarily updated.

    .

    Changing the properties of display to show only 2 decimal places does not change the numeric value stored in memory.  You would have to round up the digital to two decimal places.  To do this is to multiply the number by 100, change of an integer (this will lose the remaining decimals), then divide the result by 100 to get again the two decimal places.  When changing to an integer, you will need to round to the nearest integer to make 0.3299 0.33.

  • Buggy BIOS reporting wrong OS RAM - whatever works for the normal case... Should I buy a DELL next time?

    I know that this thread needs by Dell support, or maybe I'll get the standard answer E310 motherboard supports only 2 GB (official number).   But I hope that there are other materials here lovers like me, who have found a solution to this problem...

    Are there any success stories of the E310 Bios reports 4 GB (all) OS kernel?  I'm under A03 version BIOS because according to Dell documentation, A04 upgrade will make me only ability to run more high speed CPU, no RAM upgrades.  What a bummer... When you upgrade CPU, one would expect that users will try RAM upgrade first, and where the team BIOS should have addressed this issue first before giving the possibility of upgrade processors! Here is my account of many hours spent on the research on the internet in detail:

    Resurrect an old Dell Dimension 3100 erasure of the Windows XP with Ubuntu (Xubuntu specifically, but it could have been Windows 64-bit as well - is not serious). Version of 64-bit installed Ubuntu LTS 14.04.3. This machine has a Hyper threading, 64-bit capable Pentium 4 chipset from Intel 915GV (who may be able to max 8 GB of RAM, according to Intel). Updated from existing to 1 GB of RAM Kingston with purchase of 2 sticks of 2 GB Samsung (same model). I tried all possible combinations of 3 all the sticks of memory, as well as tests them alone on this machine. 4 GB or 3 GB, depending on the combination of the sticks, in that I put the BIOS reports. All the sticks of memory are good, and they run the machine individually.

    The problem is that I see conflicting reports of some commands to command line and of applications such as "sysinfo" or "hardinfo". Newspapers of observed point syslog to 3.2 GB kernel is seen by kernel - not the whole 4 GB which is seen by the BIOS, or other command line tools. I'm suspecting that this BIOS is buggy and not all address space gives to the kernel. Here are links showing the conflicting reports:

    1. This is what kernel sees in syslog: http://paste.ubuntu.com/12404466/
    2. Command line indicating the presence of 4 GB: http://paste.ubuntu.com/12405884/
    3. Out of "hardinfo" application: http://paste.ubuntu.com/12405897/

    I am aware that this machine was initially sold to me with 2 GB RAM max as official data. But, after seeing internet reports of others who have made 4GB and research in data of intel 915GV chipset, I think of this maybe a buggy BIOS that does not give the final of 1 GB to the kernel.

    Hi Rdunnill,

    I was informed that the cause of the loss of RAM in BIOS is due to problem 'PCI-hole', which are present in older systems.  Essentially, a lot of memory RAM is simply lost and not used by the hardware, because of this problem and the OS will get to use only about 3. DBM for the moment, it is not yet clear to me if the space occupied by the device drivers is included in the / 3GB or excluded.  So far, I know at least the part of (if not all) video memory is NOT included in the figures presented by operating system.  Other dependants of pilot data maybe OS and I am not deeply knowledgeable about the Ubuntu/Debian OS which I am now running.  So the answer to your question above is that you will see on 1 GB loss once again, if you are upgrading to 8 GB - usable RAM would be about 7 GB.  Can be an overdose, considering the price of a new machine vs RAM these days.

    I read your response (during my research) in the en.community.dell.com/support-forums/desktop/f/3514/t/19306285 thread, which would lead others to believe that all 4 GB of usable RAM.  You can change this answer here.

    You run BIOS A04, but I have not upgraded to A03 because I see that the upgrade will do anything to the question of memory (but only gives superior CPU option, which I didn't need).   Upgrading from 2.8 to 3.4 GHz CPU BIOS would gain a little speed, but I do not run CPU intensive tasks on this machine.

  • Driver problem Tuner TV PCI DVB-T/analog on Qosmio G30-126 & Win7 64 bit

    Hi all!

    I have red all messages on problem Toshiba PCI TV DVB-T/Analog hybrid Tuner on Toshiba Qosmio G30-126 and Windows 7 64-bit (x 64).
    Unfortunately, I did not find solution in messages.

    I have computers portable two Toshiba, former a Toshiba Qosmio G30-126 & new a Toshiba Qosmio G50 - 12K.
    On the new there is no problem with drivers and the new Windows 7.

    On the old but there are 2 problems. We're with the drivers for the buttons that do not exist. 2nd problem and more iritating is problem driver Toshiba PCI TV DVB-T/Analog hybrid Tuner (x 64) (code 39).

    Now, I know that here probobly is no expert Toshiba ppl, but if there is any1 who has solved this problem, pls explain below how you did... at least until the Toshiba decide to new drivers relese in the near future.

    Kind regards.

    Hey mate

    The problem is that there is no Win 7 64 bit drivers made the Qosmio G30 series.
    You have to collect the drivers with your own hands!

    Here you will find a nice display:
    http://forums.computers.Toshiba-Europe.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=49400

    You can test the Tuner driver for the Qosmio G45 - xxx series that seems to be compatible with the G30.

    See you soon

  • I have problems with my PCI simple communication driver

    laptop HP 2000

    I have troubleshotting my PCI simple communication driver problems I have no driver to install in my laptop

    Hello:

    Go to the page of the driver and support for your laptop, download and install the Intel Management Engine Interface driver found in the section chipset driver.

  • Satellite PRO P200 (PSPB7E): LAN PCI network resources - conflict problem

    Hey,.

    I have a Satellite PRO P200 and I have some problems with the local network. (not a wireless).

    When I plug in the network cable, the system want start at all. The blue power let towers and it is all tha comes.
    If I turn off the laptop, unplug the cable and turn it on, it starts, but the network card is more installed.
    I already downloaded the driver from Realtek for Vista 32 bits from the website, but no difference.

    In fact, the driver is not recognized as being a good driver for the device. I select the driver manually in a list (using have disk etc..) to get installed it. After the re-setup all the parameters of the network card in Vista or disappeared, always on dhcp.

    I already had a blue screen (vista dump), during the installation of the device.
    And a mistake:
    Conflict of resources - controller Netword PCI in the location 08
    Bus: 04, device: 00, function: 00
    Press to return to for Setup.

    I also tried to turn the peripheral as the third lan of start-up, but it automaticaly turns on again.

    I tried to update the bios to the latest version, she too successful (not), but it did not solve my problem.

    Any ideas?
    hardware failure?
    I guess that's not possible the device lan switch?

    Hello

    I read a lot of stories here, but yours is really amazing. I don't know what the problem is here, but try to enter the BIOS settings and set it to the default value. After doing this install OS using recovery media.

    Now that you must clean preinstalled OS and your laptop will have factory settings. Please retest the functionality of network card. If the problem persists, you need professional help.

  • HP Z620: Problem of auxiliary graphic workstation HP Z620 pci-e power connectors

    I want to fit my new GPU Z620 workstation card. I see that there are two auxiliary pci - e power connectors on the plastic support. I intend to use these two to put my new graphics card but I see potential problems.
    The problem is that in these two connectors pinout is not really to PCI-e spec. There are five female terminals to each 6 connector routes. The three terminals in the top row are crushed and two terminals downstairs is 12V. 6 cavity is empty in both connectors. As far as I know the PCI-e power connectors should have 12V power supplied to cavity n ° 4 and n ° 6 of cavity. What I have to manually change these two connectors pinout and move terminal 12V from cavity to cavity no.6 no.5 or there may be a few HP adapter that could solve this problem?

    connectors

    Only HP knows what HP has designed (and why) and as such, it cannot be assumed simply that a connector on a system is consistent with the 'standards' and not a "psudo owner" Connector (as seems to be the case with your PEG connector that is missing pin #3).

    Normally, a PEG 2 connector x 3 can provide 75W and as such, each 12V pin provides 1/3 of the power budget. This means that the HP "psydo owner" PEG connector, for lack of a better term, may not be able to supply 50W (if each ping is kept for the same current capabilities used in the standard 2 x 3 plug PEG).

    Then, this suggests the Z620 can only support a 175W graphics cards (with 75W of PCIe + 50W of each of the two 2 x 3 PEG connectors). Note that the standard allows graphics cards to 225W pulling 75W of the slot PCIe and 75W of each PEG 2 connector x 3!

    Thus, quantify this is to watch the quickspec for your Z620 and see what graphics cards are certified for use with your system. Then to know what cards are certified for your system, you can check what PEG connectors as appropriate are provided on these certified cards and also check what is their energy consumption. I would guess that all graphics cards that require more juice 175W has not been certified by HP...

    Since you say your card draws 165W, this budget of power seems OK during examination of the foregoing. So it should just be a matter of connect the two connectors of the PEG 2 x 3 and all should be well.

    However, it you want a card more powerful, purely based on the fact that a standard 2 x 4 connector PEG can power 150W using three-pin 12V, this would indicate that each pin can supply 50W. Assuming that the pins used in a conector of PEG 2 x 3 and 2 x 4 are the same, a 2 x 3 with only two pins 12V power connector could in theory provide 100W each. So you could in theory use a 275W card into the PCIe slot with your 2 psudo owner HP PEG connectors. BUT it means something to the pins themselves and that your HP power is up to the task (and can actually provide the necessary 275W power).

    And I would say that if you wanted a graphics 225W which is supported by standards, likley it would be a simple mod to the rider 12V among the pins for the vacancy that is normally used by the 3 pin (12V).  I'd be surprised if the block POWER HP of power and wiring could not handle the necessary extra 50W. But maybe it's a little too much for some who enjoy the guarantee.

    In any case, without owning a Z620, I would be comfortable in saying that you have no problem with this graphics card 165W and these exclusive hybrid psudo 2 x 3 PEG connectors as is

    (Heck, I don't got no problem with a 35W graphics card in a slot PCIe capable of 25W of my Dell T610 server that only supports the graphs via the inetgrated adapter)...

    But really, who knows why only two used HP pin 12V in their PEG connectors, maybe they used the best quality PINE and they were not sufficient for the cards, they chose to certify. Maybe save 2 cents for a less pin was a driving force... HP only knows what HP...

  • Satellite M40X driver PCI Device and NetworkController problem.

    Hello..

    I formatted my German original OS version for the English version. I downloaded all the drivers from the toshiba site and installed. The/CompuMgr/DeviceManger /AdminTools of /ControlPanel of system, I see that the drivers for the PCI Bus and network controller are missing.
    Any suggestion on which driver files may resolve this problem.

    Thanks in advance
    Shine

    Hello

    As Tobi said check the installation instructions. It has listed all the necessary drivers and tools and utilities. As far as I know this list is also important because it is a proper installation order.

    Good bye

  • Minitour dc5100 - installation nvidia geforce 6200 PCI - problem

    Hello

    I have an old HP Compaq DC5100 minitour, and I wanted to put in a graphics card instead of using the onboard gfx

    as windows kept alert me that I was running on system resources, and video memory.

    So after hunting around the net for a PCI card (PCI-e not that I do not have a slot on the motherboard for it)

    which are very few and far between, but I managed to find a Nvidia Geforce 6200 256 MB PCI card: Nvidia Geforce 6200
    That I jumped into one of the PCI free slots on the motherboard and has pulled up the PC... after a second fans
    closed and the PC started her off 4 short beeps (with a red light flashing in time with the beeps located under)

    the power button on the front of the pc), then stopped for a few seconds and then repeat the 4 short beeps.
    and then continued to do this until I turned off the machine.

    So I took then the video card back and put it in the second PCI slot, but the same thing happens again.

    Now, I had to take the graphics card and just plugged my monitor on the port of gfx on board.

    Does anyone know why this graphics card stop the pc to start?

    Or is there something I need to do to get it working?

    FOR INFO. I can't even get into the BIOS, so impossible to verify anything in there.

    Also, here is a picture of my motherboard and the two PCI ports:

    I had a quick glance for the beep codes but cannot determine what BIOS mine is in the list here:
    Beep codes HP

    The only information I could get from my pc has been;

    [Information BIOS]
    Provider string: Hewlett-Packard
    Version string: 786 2 v01.07
    Release date: 25/08/2005
    Size of the ROM: 512 KB

    [Information on motherboard]
    Manufacturer: Hewlett-Packard
    Product range: 09E0h
    Version string:
    Serial number: CZC6071MT0

    Good news!

    After taking all the USB devices on my machine and try again once I had no joy as it is the same with the 4 beeps and the PC shut down.

    So I headed upwards in my attic and after opening 3 old PC I got lucky and found an another PSU ATX which had the same dimensions and was a high-end with maximum capacity of 640 watts, so I it inverted and put the graphics card back in and connected USB devices , and then press the power button...... ..  .  This time there was no beep and the computer =)

    This is certainly the graphics card needed more energy than the 300 Watt who was originally in the machine.

    Thanks again for your help to solve this problem.

    Kind regards

    Mark

Maybe you are looking for