Problem VPN gateway to gateway Cisco RV042 861

Hello. I have problems with tunneling IPSec between a RV042 and a Cisco 861. I configured the IKE, turn the value, the access list and the Crypto map into the pit 861 the console and I configured the tunnel in the RV042 web application with the same IKE encryption, Diffie-Hellman group and authentication but the connection does not work. Advice or review for this type of connection? Thank you.

Your default traffic will be natting to the outside world.

You need without Nat Traffc of Source ip to Destination ip that you authorized in the VPN access list.

Mean simply to deny source ip to destination ip in NAT ACL.

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Cisco RV042 VPN hub and spokes, connecting spokes question

    Hello

    I have a few Cisco RV042 router and VPN links them with a hub and spoke topology.

    Each speaks VPN works, they manage to connect to the platform.

    The hub can see each VPN active rays.

    A computer under the hub can connect to a computer in any talks.

    A computer under any talks can connect to a computer running the hub.

    Which works very well.

    Now, what I really need, is to connect computers under a RADIUS to connect to computers under another spoke.

    It don't work.

    Current configuration of LAN:

    HUB IP / mask: 192.168.0.1 / 255.255.255.0

    Spoke1 IP / mask: 192.168.1.1 / 255.255.255.0

    Spoke2 IP / mask: 192.168.2.1 / 255.255.255.0

    I was wondering if the Cisco RV042 can be configured to allow that and HOW?

    If we can not do, should what other router I use as a hub? Should I change the rays as well?

    Thank you and have a nice day

    Hope that this document can point you the right direction.

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-12534

  • Port forwarding Cisco RV042 / RV042G

    Hello

    We use three Cisco RV042 small business routers.

    The problem:

    We want to send HTTPS Wan-side to a port other than 443 side Lan.

    For example: 217.44.55.66 Wan port 443 to 192.168.0.5 port 5001

    There is only this option in RV042: Forwarding-> Service HTTPS [TCP/443 ~ 443] to "IP address" (also Port 443)

    but we need something like this:

    Transfer-> HTTPS Service [TCP/443 ~ 443] to 192.168.0.5:5001

    How can I configure it?

    Greetings from the Germany

    Goetz Hartwig, CSI GmbH

    Hi Ituconsult1

    My name is Mehdi from the Cisco Technical Support, Yes with RV042 we can translate the port

    Please follow these steps:

    1. Please remove the port forwarding rule

    2. go in under UPnP settings, the management of the services and you will see an external port and internal port so please configure external port 443 and internal to 5001 and click Add, please do not enable UPnP

    3. on the same page, please choose the service that you have created and put the server's internal IP address

    Please note the position or mark it as answered to help other customers of Cisco

    Greeting

    Concerning

    Mehdi

  • VPN between ASA and cisco router [phase2 question]

    Hi all

    I have a problem with IPSEC VPN between ASA and cisco router

    I think that there is a problem in the phase 2

    Can you please guide me where could be the problem.
    I suspect questions ACL on the router, but I cannot fix. ACL on the router is specified below

    Looking forward for your help

    Phase 1 is like that

    Cisco_router #sh crypto isakmp his

    IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association
    status of DST CBC State conn-id slot
    78.x.x.41 87.x.x.4 QM_IDLE 2006 0 ACTIVE

    and ASA

    ASA # sh crypto isakmp his

    ITS enabled: 1
    Generate a new key SA: 0 (a tunnel report Active 1 and 1 to generate a new key during the generate a new key)
    Total SA IKE: 1

    1 peer IKE: 78.x.x.41
    Type: L2L role: initiator
    Generate a new key: no State: MM_ACTIVE

    Phase 2 on SAA

    ASA # sh crypto ipsec his
    Interface: Outside
    Tag crypto map: Outside_map, seq num: 20, local addr: 87.x.x.4

    Outside_cryptomap_20 ip 172.19.209.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 172.
    19.194.0 255.255.255.0
    local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.209.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
    Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.194.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
    current_peer: 78.x.x.41

    #pkts program: 8813, #pkts encrypt: 8813, #pkts digest: 8813
    #pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts check: 0
    compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
    #pkts uncompressed: 8813, model of #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0
    #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0

    local crypto endpt. : 87.x.x.4, remote Start crypto. : 78.x.x.41

    Path mtu 1500, fresh ipsec generals 58, media, mtu 1500
    current outbound SPI: C96393AB

    SAS of the esp on arrival:
    SPI: 0x3E9D820B (1050509835)
    transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac no
    running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel}
    slot: 0, id_conn: 7, crypto-card: Outside_map
    calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (4275000/3025)
    Size IV: 8 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y
    outgoing esp sas:
    SPI: 0xC96393AB (3378746283)
    transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac no
    running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel}
    slot: 0, id_conn: 7, crypto-card: Outside_map
    calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (4274994/3023)
    Size IV: 8 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y

    Phase 2 on cisco router

    protégé of the vrf: (none)
    local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.209.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
    Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.194.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
    current_peer 87.x.x.4 port 500
    LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},
    #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0
    #pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts check: 0
    compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
    #pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0
    #pkts not unpacked: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
    Errors #send 0, #recv 0 errors

    local crypto endpt. : 78.x.x.41, remote Start crypto. : 87.x.x.4
    Path mtu 1452, ip mtu 1452, ip mtu BID Dialer0
    current outbound SPI: 0x0 (0)

    SAS of the esp on arrival:

    the arrival ah sas:

    SAS of the CFP on arrival:

    outgoing esp sas:

    outgoing ah sas:

    outgoing CFP sas:

    protégé of the vrf: (none)
    local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.194.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
    Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.209.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
    current_peer 87.x.x.4 port 500
    LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},
    #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0
    #pkts decaps: 8947, #pkts decrypt: 8947, #pkts check: 8947
    compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
    #pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0
    #pkts not unpacked: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
    Errors #send 0, #recv 0 errors

    local crypto endpt. : 78.x.x.41, remote Start crypto. : 87.x.x.4
    Path mtu 1452, ip mtu 1452, ip mtu BID Dialer0
    current outbound SPI: 0x3E9D820B (1050509835)

    SAS of the esp on arrival:
    SPI: 0xC96393AB (3378746283)
    transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac.
    running parameters = {Tunnel}
    Conn ID: 29, flow_id: Motorola SEC 1.0:29, card crypto: mycryptomap
    calendar of his: service life remaining (k/s) key: (4393981/1196)
    Size IV: 8 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y
    Status: ACTIVE

    the arrival ah sas:

    SAS of the CFP on arrival:

    outgoing esp sas:
    SPI: 0x3E9D820B (1050509835)
    transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac.
    running parameters = {Tunnel}
    Conn ID: 30, flow_id: Motorola SEC 1.0:30, card crypto: mycryptomap
    calendar of his: service life remaining (k/s) key: (4394007/1196)
    Size IV: 8 bytes
    support for replay detection: Y
    Status: ACTIVE

    outgoing ah sas:

    outgoing CFP sas:

    VPN configuration is less in cisco router

    access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 connect
    access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect
    access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 connect
    access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect
    access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 connect
    access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect

    access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 connect
    access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect
    access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 connect
    access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect
    access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 connect
    access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect

    sheep allowed 10 route map
    corresponds to the IP 105

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac mytransformset

    mycryptomap 100 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
    the value of 87.x.x.4 peer
    Set transform-set mytransformset
    match address 101

    crypto ISAKMP policy 100
    BA 3des
    md5 hash
    preshared authentication
    Group 2
    ISAKMP crypto key xxx2011 address 87.x.x.4

    Your permit for 105 ACL statement should be down is changed to match because it is the most general ACL.

    You currently have:

    Extend the 105 IP access list
    5 permit ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 (18585 matches)
    10 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 connect
    30 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 connect
    50 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 connect

    It should be:

    Extend the 105 IP access list
    10 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 connect
    30 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 connect
    50 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 connect

    IP 172.19.194.0 allow 60 0.0.0.255 (18585 matches)

    To remove it and add it to the bottom:

    105 extended IP access list

    not 5

    IP 172.19.194.0 allow 60 0.0.0.255 any

    Then ' delete ip nat trans. "

    and it should work now.

  • Remote VPN gateway to gateway problem RV016 to add VLANs

    Hi all I have a little problem with RV016. I have a site to another LAN ipsec virtual and I would like to add a vlan remote for tunneling but RV has only three options

    -IP

    -Subnet

    IP range-

    Now the remote lan for vpn is 192.168.10.0/24 and I would add 10.1.1.0/24

    Can someone help me?

    Glad to hear it

    Please note the post useful and mark it as answered to help other customers of Cisco

    See you soon

    Mehdi

  • Default VPN Gateway problem

    Hello guys. We have vpn site to site... and this is my scenairio.

    Site A (ASA 5505).

    VLAN 1 - outside = 200.200.200.x - internet

    VLAN 2-inside 192.168.8.1

    Eth0/1---192.168.8.2

    255.255.255.0

    Gateway 192.168.8.1


    It's my laptop

    Eth0/1 192.168.8.3

    255.255.255.0

    no gateway.

    LINUX Server

    For my site VPN remote B can reach my ip from 192.168.8.2 because of the gateway laptop I put it

    but he can't reach my Linux Sesrver 192.168.8.3 because there is no gateway.

    and I don't want to add a gateway my server for some reason... so please can someone help me out here, it's very important for me.

    You don't add gateway no choice to get connectivity.

    Thank you

    Ajay

  • Cisco RV042 cannot create a simple VPN?

    Hello

    I'm confused because I'm trying to set up a simple VPN (client of the bridge), but I can't!

    A SSL VPN or an IPSEC VPN, whatever...

    The RV042 firmware is up-to-date, and I try QuickVPN as a customer vpn (also updated...)

    My configuration details:

    I'm at the: 192.168.2.14/24

    My RV042: 192.168.2.250/24

    And the VPN intend to connect to: 192.168.4.x

    I am currently in testing... that's why I use private IP...

    Customer gateway
    Add a new VPN group

    Tunnel ofgroup VPN
    Group No. 1
    Name of the tunnel: VPN TEST
    Interface: WAN1WAN2
    Activate:
    Configuration of local groups

    Type of local security group: Range IPSubnetIP
    IP address: 192.168.4.0
    Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
    Remote Client installation

    Remote client: Domain Name (FQDN) Email address (USER FQDN) Client Microsoft VPN XP/2000
    Domain name: Microsoft.com
    IPSec configuration

    Input mode: IKE with preshared key
    Group of the phase 1 of DH: Group 1-768 bitGroup bitGroup 2-1024 bit 5-1536
    Encryption of the phase 1: DES3DESAES-128AES-192AES-256
    Authentication of the phase 1: MD5SHA1
    Phase 1 time in HIS life: 28800 seconds
    Perfect Forward Secrecy:
    Group of the phase 2 DH: Group 1-768 bitGroup bitGroup 2-1024 bit 5-1536
    Encryption of the phase 2: DES3DESAES-128AES-192AES-256
    Authentication of the phase 2: MD5SHA1
    Time for phase 2 of HIS life: 3600 seconds
    Pre-shared key: 123456

    so far, nothing fancy... Ok?

    So I create my username for the test:

    VPN Client Access
    User name:
    New password:
    Confirm the new password:
    Allow the change of password: YesNo.
    Active:
    DTSInfo-online Active

    The user is created and activated...

    For the test, I have disabled the firewall (router + windows 7).

    A dnow, when I lunch the QuickVPN client:

    Then, when I have lunch:

    > Connection...

    > Activation of policy...

    > Verification of network...

    > The remote gateway is not responding. You don't want to wait? [NO]

    > Disconecting from the server...

    This means that, after activation of the policy, I am connected on the router (user status: active). But when he check network... I am offline!

    There is the newspaper of the RV042:

    dec 18 12:57:50 2012 The VPN log description of the additional connection (qknips1)
    dec 18 12:57:50 2012 The VPN log listen to IKE messages
    dec 18 12:57:50 2012 The VPN log forget the secrets
    dec 18 12:57:50 2012 The VPN log loading of the secrets of ' / etc/ipsec.d/ipsec.secrets'
    18 12:57:57 dec 2012 The VPN log (qknips1): removal of connection

    If I'm signed for 7 seconds... Why?

    Can someone help me?

    When I try with the built-in Windows VPN client, newspapers are filled just more... ^ ^

    Help! hour

    Thanks (and sorry for my bad English ^ ^)

    Hello

    Please use our forum

    Hi Skip my name is Johnnatan and I'm part of the community of support to small businesses. I ve seen your post and I see you are using Windows 7 and that you disable your firewall to test your connection. A configuration of the computer and the router must be in order to solve your problem.

    Computer

    As you use Windows 7, you must enable the Windows Firewall and create 2 rules, also make sure that Ipsec communication is allowed, you can follow these steps:

    http://www6.nohold.NET/CiscoSB/Loginr.aspx?login=1&PID=2&app=search&VW=1&articleid=2922

    Router:

    Go firewall > basic settings and

    Disable: Block WAN request

    Enable: Remote Management

    Go to VPN > VPN Passthrough and make sure everything is activate.

    I hope that you will find this answer useful, if it was satisfactory to you, please indicate the question as answer. Please note post you consider useful.

    Greetings,

    Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.

    Support of Cisco network engineer.

  • VPN gateway to gateway RV0XX

    Greetings,

    I have a RV082 and a RV042. I was able to successfully establish a vpn connection from gateway to gateway between the two and I can remotely manage each router through the VPN connection, but I am unable to computers ping from one side of the connection to the other. For example, a computer in the 10.10.1.0 subnet cannot see / ping / communicate with a computer in the 192.168.1.0 subnet.

    Here are the configurations for each. Apart from static IP configurations and VPN configurations, no other changes were made to the routers.

    RV082

    DHCP enabled

    Tunnel of status: connected

    Configuration of local groups

    • IP only: X.X.X.66
    • Local security group type: subnet
    • IP address: 10.10.1.0
    • Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0

    Dear ybrow,

    All new discussions of small business (which includes the model of your routers) have been migrated to the Cisco Small Business Support Community. All small businesses existing discussions have been archived here for reference.  We made these changes to better serve all customers of Cisco now and in the future.

    Visit the Cisco Small Business Support Community Home Page created specifically for Linksys and Linksys by Cisco community members.

    Thank you!

  • RV082 VPN gateway to gateway does not solve remote gateway DynDns

    I have two RV082 is connected. Each has a dynamic IP address (generally changes every few weeks). I have configured tunnels on both ends with a local and remote "Remote/Local Security Gateway Type" of "+ IP dynamic authentication with domain name".

    If I look at the State of the VPN tunnel summary, it shows the IP "mondomaine.dyndns.org 0.0.0.0" under the column heading "Remote Gateway". The button "Connect" Tunnel test is n/a.

    I can solve each mondomaine.dyndns.org on both sides of each VPN entry using the Diagnostic DNS search within each router. If I wired a fixed IP address for the Local and the remote gateway, everything works fine. VPN is good.

    I can't seem to get the "mondomaine.dyndns.org" function works. It seems that the router is unable to solve the dynamic IP address of the domain names on each of the routers.

    I am confused, but this is my first time using a Cisco VPN router. Thanks in advance for some ideas.

    Hello MtnSledder,

    You can use only address dynamic IP + domain name (FQDN) of one side of the tunnel. On the other device try to select IP and then the possibility of using the IP by DNS resolved.  You will find this under the remote gateway once you select IP only.

    Give that a try and it must raise the tunnel.

    Christopher Ebert

    Network support - Cisco Small Business Support Center Engineer

  • I need VPN gateway to gateway with NAT for several subnets, RV082

    I have a pair of RV082 routers and I would like to configure a gateway to gateway VPN tunnel, as described in a book, "How to configure a VPN tunnel that routes all traffic to the remote gateway," (name of file Small_business_router_tunnel_Branch_to_Main.doc).  I followed this recipe book and found that my while the main office has internet connectivity, the branch subnet is not an internet connection.

    Routing behaves as advertised, where all traffic goes to the seat.  However, the 192.168.1.0 subnet in the branch receives no internet connectivity.  I read in other posts that the main router will provide only NAT for the local subnet, not the Management Office subnet.  Is it possible to configure the RV082 router to provide NAT for all subnets?

    If this is not the case, what product Cisco will provide connectivity VPN Tunnel as well as the NAT for all subnets?  The RV082 can be used as part of the final solution or are my RV082s a wasted expense?

    Here is the configuration that I had put in place, (real IP and IKE keys are false).

    Bridge to bridge

    Remote Head Office

    Add a new Tunnel

    No de tunnel                  1                                               2

    Name of the tunnel:, n1 n1-2122012_n2-1282012-2122012_n2-1282012

    Interface: WAN1 WAN1

    Enable :                   yes                                             yes

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Configuration of local groups

    Type of local security gateway: IP only IP only

    IP address: 10.10.10.123 10.10.10.50

    Local security group type: subnet subnet

    IP address: 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0

    Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Configuration of the remote control groups

    Remote security gateway type: IP only IP only

    IP address: 65.182.226.50 67.22.242.123

    Security remote control unit Type: subnet subnet

    IP address: 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.0

    Subnet mask: 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    IPSec configuration

    Input mode: IKE with preshared key IKE with preshared key

    Group of the phase 1 of DH: Group 5 - 1536 bit group 5 - 1536 bit

    Encryption of the phase 1: of THE

    The phase 1 authentication: MD5 MD5

    Step 1 time in HIS life: 2800 2800 seconds

    Perfect Forward Secrecy: Yes Yes

    Group of the phase 2 DH: Group 5 - 1536 bit group 5 - 1536 bit

    Encryption of the phase 2: of THE

    Phase 2 of authentication: MD5 MD5

    Time of the phase 2 of HIS life: 3600 seconds 3600 seconds

    Preshared key: MyKey MYKey

    Minimum complexity of pre-shared key: Enable Yes Enable

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If you are running 4.x firmware on your RV082, you must add an additional Allow access rule for the Branch Office subnet (considered one of the multiple subnets in the main office) may have access to the internet. Note the firmware version has more details about it.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/routers/CSBR/rv0xx/release/rv0xx_rn_v4-1-1-01.PDF

  • VPN gateway with the traffic filtering

    I work in his laboratory on a configuration on a small scale in which client PC establishes an IPSEC VPN with Cisco 1921 router, I have two questions in this regard.

    (1) for wireless PC clients, uses an IPSEC VPN Client the best option or should I prefer other options. wireless clients also use Radius Server for authentication.

    (2) I want to make sure no other traffic can reach or pass the interface of local network other than the VPN Client traffic, I need to set up on the router to make sure that no other traffic cannot pass other than traffic APV.

    First: The real IPsec VPN client is the AnyConnect. The VPN-config for AnyConnect (especially for IPsec) gateway on the router IOS is much more difficult, so it's on the SAA. If you still have the possibility of changing the front doors, then go for a SAA. It is also much cheaper from a perspective of license given that no license of AnyConnect Essentials for the router. The Cisco VPN Client to the traditional address is EOL and should not begin a new deployment on this basis.

    Your questions:

    (1) all VPN - users should be authenticated in some way. Send the request to a central directory authentication is a best practice and usually done with RADIUS. In addition to authentication, you can also perform an authorization to control what rights Gets a VPN user.

    (2) If you only want to allow IPsec traffic, you must configure an access list, a permit for UDP/500, UDP/4500 and IP/50 of your router IP. With this config, all other traffic will be dropped.

  • Problems to connect via the Cisco VPN client IPSec of for RV180W small business router

    Hello

    I tried to configure my router Cisco of RV180W as a customer VPN IPSec, but have encountered a problem that I hope someone can help me with. "" I managed to do the work of configuration so that the Cisco's VPN IPSec client authenticates successfully with the XAUTH user, I put on the router, but during the negotiation, the client ends with the following, which appears several times on the router error message: ' Mar 20 Oct 19:41:53 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [34360] has no config mode.

    I've read around the internet and a number of people seem to say that the Cisco VPN Client is not compatible with the router, but the same thing happens to my iPhone VPN client.

    Is it possible that this can be implemented? Below, I have attached the full configuration files and the log files. Thank you much in advance.

    Router log file (I changed the IP addresses > respectively as well as references to MAC addresses)

    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: floating ports NAT - T with counterpart > [44074]
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: notification to ignore INITIAL-CONTACT > [44074] because it is admitted only after the phase 1.
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload does not match for > [4500]
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload does not match for > [44074]
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: CISCO-UNITY
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: NAT detected: is located behind a device. NAT and alsoPeer is behind a NAT device
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: request sending Xauth for > [44074]
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association established for > [4500] -> [44074] with spi =>.
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: receives the type of the attribute 'ISAKMP_CFG_REPLY' of > [44074]
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: login successful for the user "myusername".
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: myusername XAuthUser connected from the IP >
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: sending of information Exchange: Notify payload [10381]
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: receives the type of the attribute 'ISAKMP_CFG_REQUEST' of > [44074]
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: ignored attribute 5
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: attribute ignored 28683
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no mode config
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: attribute ignored 28684
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no mode config
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: remove the invalid payload with doi:0.
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: purged-Association of ISAKMP security with proto_id = ISAKMP and spi =>.
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: myusername XAuthUser Logged Out of the IP >
    Mar 20 Oct 20:03:16 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association deleted for > [4500] -> [44074] with spi =>

    The router configuration

    IKE policy

    VPN strategy

    Client configuration

    Hôte : < router="" ip=""> >

    Authentication group name: remote.com

    Password authentication of the Group: mysecretpassword

    Transport: Enable Transparent Tunneling; IPSec over UDP (NAT/PAT)

    Username: myusername

    Password: mypassword

    Please contact Cisco.

    Correct, the RV180 is not compatible with the Cisco VPN Client.  The Iphone uses the Cisco VPN Client.

    You can use the PPTP on the RV180 server to connect a PPTP Client.

    In addition, it RV180 will allow an IPsec connection to third-party customers 3.  Greenbow and Shrew Soft are 2 commonly used clients.

  • Simple PCI Communications driver problem - formerly gateway Vista 32 Bit Q6600

    Hope someone finds an answer that left me speechless.

    I upgraded from Vista to Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit version without a problem. However I noticed my video card on the bus PCI did not and I had to use the built in video to installation.  Check in the device he showed intel and a hex code I wanted in the driver database. The entrance really didn't say much. I tried downloads from Intel and pretty much everyone says to install the OS was not correct or the PC did not meet the minimum requirements. So no luck on the Intel Management Engine of the version or the drivers or inf updates.

    The gateway website has my model but supported stopped at Vista 32bits, so no luck there.

    The chipset is the 965 short-lived one Intel at this time.

    It's a shame to leave a really nice pc of themselves to lose. Performance statistics are all very well except for the video those handicapped by Intels minimum support built-in.

    Does anyone know of a for Win 7 PCI simple communication driver that can be done to install it?  Update of Windows, search for the update and the internet search come up with nothing.

    This is apparently a well known problem with few definitive answers. Now, I could say that the driver never existed.

    Experts in gateway, Microsoft and Intel, please save my pc!

    Thank you

    Radstger

    Radstger

    Install the Vista driver in "compatibility" mode

    To install in compatibility mode do the following:

    Click with the right button on the installer > properties > compatibility > choose OS

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/make-older-programs-run-in-this-version-of-Windows?SignedIn=1

  • Router VPN-gateway, without browsing

    Hi all, I had problems with my RV120w I can't connect via the Internet to my network of workplaces from another site, I ping the router but can´t go, any help will be useful

    Hi isaac mora

    In order to solve your problem, check your VPN configuration using this document

    http://sbkb.Cisco.com/CiscoSB/UKP.aspx?VW=1&docid=469869acd2fa43d1be369e6422facafc_Gateway_to_Gateway_VPN_Tunnel_between_RV120W_routers.XML&PID=4&FCID=&fpid=&slnid=4

    If all goes well, try this:

    Conect a computer directly to your modem.

    get dns address (start-> run-> ¨cmd¨ type-> type ¨nslookup¨)

    Check the connection you get is different than 127.0.0.x and is different from any address of your local network.

    In this case, contact your internet service provider and and request for technical assistance.

    Thank you.

    Best regards and have a nice day.

    Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.

    Support of Cisco network engineer.

  • Cannot ping sub interface from my remote site VPN gateways

    I can't ping my gateways to interface my remote vpn connection sub

    I can ping 192.6.1.0 network, but can't ping network 192.6.2.0 or 192.6.3.0

    When I remote desktop in 192.6.1.20 I can ping all the networks, including gateways to interface sub.

    I think that something in my asa is misconfigured or not added

    ASA NAT rules:

    Exempt NAT Interface: inside

    Source 192.6.0.0/16

    Destination 192.6.10.96/27

    Static NAT interface: inside (it's for the local NAT of E0/0 out)

    Source 192.6.1.1/16

    Interface translated outside the Destination: 172.35.221.200

    Dynamic NAT interface: inside

    Source: no

    Destination: outside

    ASA access rules:

    Permit outside

    Source: no

    Destination: out

    Services: udp, tcp, tcp/http

    Static routes:

    Interface: Outside > network: all outdoors DSL (shows no DSL in the graph)

    Some incorrect configuration:

    On the ASA:

    (1) directions are incorrect, the default should point to the next hop route, that is to say: the internet router: 172.35.221.x, as follows:

    Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.35.221.x

    ---> where x must be the router internet ip address.

    existing routes need to be removed:

    No route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.298.47.182 255

    No route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.35.209.81 in tunnel

    (2) the following declaration of the static NAT is incorrect too and should be removed:

    static (inside, outside) USSLTA01_External USSLTA01 netmask 255.255.255.255

    --> You can not NAT interface on the SAA itself.

    (3) for the SAA within the interface's subnet mask should be 255.255.255.0, no 255.255.0.0. It should be the same as the router interface subnet mask:

    interface Ethernet0/1

    nameif inside

    security-level 100

    IP 192.6.1.254 255.255.255.0

    (4) on the way to access these sub interfaces subnet on the SAA as follows:

    Route inside 192.6.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.6.1.235

    Route inside 192.6.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.6.1.235

    Route inside 192.6.4.0 255.255.255.0 192.6.1.235

    On the router, configure it by default route as follows:

    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.6.1.254

Maybe you are looking for

  • iCloud inbox disappeared

    Hello The problem is simple - my Inbox iCloud disappeared (around the time when I created the iCloud on my phone mailbox - not sure if they are related). I saw that some of you have had this problem, I tried everything that was suggested in other pos

  • Security Center and updates of Windows do not work on Vista laptop

    I have a laptop Dell Inspiron with Vista 1405E.    The Security Center and Windows updates do not work. I ran Norton Utilities to clean the registry and I deleted Norton Antivirus (completely, following the instructions from Symantec on the phone), b

  • What happens in the event the sensor when the IDSMC is down?

    Can someone on the list perhaps point me in the right direction? I'm looking for the following information. 1. I would like to know what is happening for alarm events to a sensor where the receiver IDSMC is down at the level of the VMS 2.1 server. Th

  • Capture resolution size vs. size

    I just want to check something.  We create training in 1600 x 900.  I set my resolution of screen of this size.  Then I put Captivate to record at this size (this is for software simulations).So when the recording box red of Captivate - why it's not

  • I need to install CC 2015 without removing 2014

    Applications have already downloaded but I have not installed. I am more able to access download preferences choose to leave the old versions on my machine. Is there a way to remove the download and then manually download and then go to keep the prev