Problems NAT trying to authenticate through an ASA to AD

Similar Questions

• I have problems in trying to get through my music files to W M P burn, I have them on my hard drive of diving, pro, cool edt and I can't bring them to burn, I need help :)

  I have problems in trying to get through my music files to W M P burn, I have them on my hard drive of diving, pro, cool edt and I can't bring them to burn, I need help :)

  • You have problems with programs
  • Error messages
  • Recent changes to your computer
  • What you have already tried to solve the problem

  I have problems in trying to get through my music files to W M P burn, I have them on my hard drive of diving, pro, cool edt and I can't bring them to burn, I need help :)

  ========================================
  Can you navigate to the actual file stored music files
  in and add it to the WMP library?

  File / add to library... or enter... F3

  Then, create a Playlist...

  File / create a Playlist... or type... CTRL + N

  Maybe the following will help:

  Windows Vista-
  Add items to the windows
  Media Player library
  http://windowshelp.Microsoft.com/Windows/en-us/help/60fc17d8-7924-4600-93e8-39873ee2d5e91033.mspx

  Windows Vista-
  Create or change a regular playlist in Windows Media Player
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/create-or-change-a-regular-playlist-in-Windows-Media-Player

  Windows Media Player 11 for Windows Vista
  Burn a CD or DVD in Windows Media Player
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/burn-a-CD-or-DVD-in-Windows-Media-Player
  (Expand the section: "Burn audio CD")

  Volunteer - MS - MVP - Digital Media Experience J - Notice_This is not tech support_I'm volunteer - Solutions that work for me may not work for you - * proceed at your own risk *.

• Windows removes the internet conntction system. Connected directly to the modem. Have tried to go through just wifi. the same problem. Only happened for several weeks.

  Windows deletes internet conntction after a few minutes. The netgear and control panel says I'm always connected. Must reboot to get reconnected to the windows system. Connected directly to the modem. Have tried to go through just wifi. The same problem. Only happened for several weeks.

  Hi Sailortdt,

  Welcome to Microsoft Community where you can find the answers related to Windows.

  According to the description, it looks like you are facing a problem with network connectivity.

  It would be awesome if you could answers to these questions in order to help you further.

  1. have you made changes on the computer before this problem?

  2. you receive an error message or error code?

  I suggest you to see the steps in the following Microsoft article and check if it helps.

  Problems in Windows wireless and wired network connection: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/help/wired-and-wireless-network-connection-problems-in-windows

  If you need Windows guru, do not hesitate to post your questions and we will be happy to help you.

• Received my brother in laws laptop cannot connect wireless, although I can of my own laptop. Trying to connect through the new laptop, I do not see even my own network.

  Received my brother in laws laptop cannot connect wireless, although I can of my own laptop. Trying to connect through the new laptop, I do not see even my own network! What I'm missing here? I'm sure it's maybe something simple, but for the life of me! (When my brother-in-law used this computer, he only uses it through dialup (!), he lives in a remote area). With the help of Vista, and when 'Management of connections' I see my network...

  original title: cannot connect wireless

  Hello

  ·         You get the error message?

  Method 1:

  I suggest you update the drivers for hardware connected to your computer on the Web site of the manufacturer check if it works.

  Updated a hardware driver that is not working properly

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/update-a-driver-for-hardware-that-isn ' t-work correctly

  Method 2:

  Also, follow the steps in troubleshooting section and check if that helps:

  In the Windows wireless network connection problems

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/wireless-network-connection-problems-in-Windows

  Check out these links and check if that helps

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/set-up-a-wireless-router

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/setting-up-a-wireless-network

  See also:

  Solve problems with computers not appearing is not in the network map

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/troubleshoot-problems-with-computers-not-appearing-on-the-network-map

  Hope this helps

• Error: Copy Photos "Windows has encountered a problem wen trying to copy this file.

  original title: copy files confuses computer!

  When I try to copy photos on my drive E or D (which I've done a thousand times) it now says ' widows has encountered a problem when trying to copy this file "... What do you do? ".. . as I have a shaky choice! ' cos it gives the options... How *, it's that ' cos they must be aware of * advertising but feel so safe in their ivory towers! What's wrong. Help, please. MikeW

  There are two approaches you can take.

  One solution: you can copy files into smaller "chunks" until you identify the file that causes the error, and then try to find out what is the problem with this file.

  Another solution is to download the program "Robust copy" (Robocopy) to Microsoft and it allows to copy your files.  You download and install in the Windows 2003 Resource Kit (works fine on XP).

  Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit:
  <>http://www.Microsoft.com/en-US/Download/details.aspx?ID=17657 >

  Once installed, you can open a command prompt window (start-> Run-> "cmd") and enter the command:
  Robocopy "C:\photos" 'E:\photos' /R:5 / s
  Where "C:\photos" will be replaced by the source directory, and the 'E:\photos' is the destination directory.  the "/ S" option will copy the subdirectories and the R:5 option retries 5 times on error before moving on to the next file.  Errors should be displayed on the screen and I found errors of command line to be more descriptive than GUI errors.  There are a lot more options, but this should help you get started.

  HTH,
  JW

• VPN connections are suddenly trying to connect through a non-existent modem instead of wireless.

  I have several set up VPN connections that I use for a few months. Today, I tried today to connect to one of them and realized that the dialog box connection said dial instead of connect. It is now trying to connect through a modem, which I don't have.

  I deleted the VPN configuration and set up a new, but I get the same thing. When I go into the properties of the VPN connection, for 'connect using', he says 'deleted Modem - (unavailable device). There is no option to select the appropriate device.

  I have no idea what this happened, but I connect now connect to any VPN because they all are trying to use this modem that does not exist. I can connect to the Internet fine. I can connect to the thin wireless networks. It's just the VPN connections.

  Open IE and make sure the box never establish a connection isCHECKED.

  http://CID-25ab668da65c8fbe.photos.live.com/self.aspx/Windows%20images/Neverdialaconnection.PNG

  MS - MVP Windows Desktop Experience
  "When all else fails try what the captain suggested before you started...". »

• My adobe will open and say "install updates" but it stops at 5% and told to try to connect to the server. It won't go past that. I tried to update through the view, but it still does the same thing.

  My adobe will open and say "install updates" but it stops at 5% and told to try to connect to the server. It won't go past that. I tried to update through the view, but it still does the same thing. I tried to reinstall, but it usually because of my other apps I have. How can I fix it?

  Hi crystal,

  Please see the following link for assistance on this issue;

  https://helpx.Adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/download-update-errors.html

  Concerning

  Harsha

• I need to speak to a representative for the problems with having bought and cannot install. Spend too much time trying to solve through this method.

  What number can I reach a representative?

  Hello

  Please contact our support chat for assistance:http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service-b.html

  Kind regards

  Florence

• Intercept-dhcp works to tunnel L2TP through IPsec ASA?

  Hello

  Is there anyone in the world operating a tunnel L2TP through IPsec on Cisco ASA for the native Windows clients and a Tunnel Split Configuration fully functional?

  I created a tunnel L2TP through IPsec on the ASA 5520 9.1 (6) Version of the software running. My configuration is:

  mask 172.23.32.1 - 172.23.33.255 255.255.252.0 IP local pool VPN_Users

  ROUTING_SPLIT list standard access allowed 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0
  ROUTING_SPLIT list standard access allowed 172.16.0.0 255.248.0.0

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-aes-256 WIN10, esp-sha-hmac ikev1
  transport mode encryption ipsec transform-set WIN10 ikev1
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac WIN7 ikev1
  Crypto ipsec transform-set transport WIN7 using ikev1
  Dynamic crypto map DYNMAP 10 set transform-set WIN10 WIN7 ikev1
  Crypto dynamic-map DYNMAP 10 the value reverse-road
  card crypto CMAP 99-isakmp dynamic ipsec DYNMAP
  CMAP interface ipsec crypto map

  Crypto isakmp nat-traversal 29
  crypto ISAKMP disconnect - notify
  Ikev1 enable ipsec crypto
  IKEv1 crypto policy 10
  preshared authentication
  aes-256 encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  life 86400
  output
  IKEv1 crypto policy 20
  preshared authentication
  3des encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  life 86400
  output

  internal EIK_USERS_RA group policy
  EIK_USERS_RA group policy attributes
  value of 12.34.56.7 DNS Server 12.34.56.8
  VPN - connections 2
  L2TP ipsec VPN-tunnel-Protocol ikev1
  disable the password-storage
  enable IP-comp
  enable PFS
  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
  value of Split-tunnel-network-list ROUTING_SPLIT
  ad.NYME.Hu value by default-field
  Intercept-dhcp enable
  the authentication of the user activation
  the address value VPN_Users pools
  output

  attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup
  authentication-server-group challenger
  accounting-server-group challenger
  Group Policy - by default-EIK_USERS_RA
  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup
  IKEv1 pre-shared-key *.
  tunnel-group DefaultRAGroup ppp-attributes
  No chap authentication
  no authentication ms-chap-v1
  ms-chap-v2 authentication
  output

  Now, the native Windows clients can connect using this group of tunnel:

  our - asa # show remote vpn-sessiondb

  Session type: IKEv1 IPsec

  User name: w10vpn Index: 1
  Assigned IP: 172.23.32.2 public IP address: 12.34.56.9
  Protocol: IKEv1 IPsecOverNatT L2TPOverIPsecOverNatT
  License: Another VPN
  Encryption: IKEv1: (1) 3DES IPsecOverNatT: (1) L2TPOverIPsecOverNatT AES256: (1) no
  Hash: IKEv1: (1) IPsecOverNatT SHA1: (1) L2TPOverIPsecOverNatT SHA1: (1) no
  TX Bytes: 1233 bytes Rx: 10698
  Group Policy: Group EIK_USERS_RA Tunnel: DefaultRAGroup
  Connect time: 15:12:29 UTC Friday, April 8, 2016
  Duration: 0: 00: 01:00
  Inactivity: 0 h: 00 m: 00s
  Result of the NAC: unknown
  Map VLANS: VLAN n/a: no

  However, real communication takes place above the tunnel if I 'Gateway on remote network use default'. If I disable this option among the preferences of the IPv4 of the virtual interface of VPN in Control Panel as described in the section 'Configuration of Tunnel of Split' of This DOCUMENT then Windows sends all packets through the channel, because it fails to extract from the ASA routing table. Split routing works perfectly when using legacy Cisco VPN Client with the same group policy, but does not work with L2TP over IPsec.

  As far as I can see, the 'intercept-dhcp' option is inefficient somehow. I even managed to intercept packets of the PPP virtual machine Windows XP interface, and I saw that windows sends its DHCP INFORM requests, but the ASA does not. My question is why?

  -J' made a mistake in the above configuration?

  -Can there be one option somewhere else in my config running that defuses intercept-dhcp?

  - Or is there a software bug in my version of firmware ASA? (BTW, I tried with several versions of different software without success?

  Hi, I have the same problem you have, but I was lucky enough to be able to install version 9.2 (4) on which this feature works very well. I'm suspecting that it is a bug, but I need to dig a little deeper. If I find something interesting I'll share it here.

• Access connections 4.52 tries to authenticate until the user logs

  We have a large number of computers laptop R61 and R61i on our field. How they are to connect to the network is the Windows login screen appears, the user enters his user name and password, THEN access should try to access the network and connect.

  Now, we have a few computers that start at the login screen but before the user can enter their credentials, logins continues its merry way and starts logging in the wireless... Since many of our customers are looking at the keys instead of the screen, they don't see what happens and are QUITE frustrated that they have to keep re - typing their username and password.

  Of course, the network connection fails because all users logging into our wireless network must have a domain account.

  This is how it is currently set up and works on MOST laptops.

  Wireless network using the JUMP to step 4 (safety type)

  TKIP encryption type is

  News of connection is configured to use the Windows logon user name and password<--- ac="" tries="" to="" log="" in="" before="" obtaining="">

  Tried with and without the inclusion of the domain name in the login name and refusing access until the user authenticates, but no go.

  I also tried with PEAP settings as well, but that he has not solved.

  Any ideas?  Y at - it a Windows update that causes maybe this?

  Salvation Fuzz!

  Try to change these keys in Regedit ens valeur0.

  HKLM\SOFTWARE\Lenovo\Access Connections\Roaming\EnableEthernetRoaming

  HKLM\SOFTWARE\Lenovo\Access Connections\Roaming\EnableRoaming

  Let me know if it solves the problem!

• Problem with trying to install IE8 on XP/SP3 system

  I tried to install Internet Explorer 8 several times in a few months and always get this question:

  IE8 can't install because I need a software update.  I click on the 'Update Now' button and go through the automatic process, which crashes and I then gives me the option to install the update myself.  I'm going to that link and try to install update, KB932823.  It's always fails and told me that the version of the service pack of my system is newer than the update that I am trying to install.  "There is no need to install this update".  So I can not install IE8 and I can not find similar problems in areas from Member States.   I have XP SP3 installed with IE7.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/newsgroups/reader.mspx?DG=Microsoft.public.WindowsXP.General

  Link above is to the XP newsgroups.

  There is a list of groups of discussion XP to the bottom of the left column.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/list/en-us/default.aspx?DG=Microsoft.public.InternetExplorer.General&cat=en_us_28cca3eb-7037-4D4F-bde1-d8efee1f1420&lang=en&CR=us

  «Discussions in microsoft.public.internetexplorer.general»

  You get the help you need there.

  Here is the Vista Forums.

  See you soon

  Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• Problem with Tunnel VPN L2L between 2 ASA´s

  Hi guys,.

  I have some problems with my VPN Site to site tunnel between 2 ASA (5520/5505).

  I watched a lot of videos on youtube, but I can't find out why the tunnel does not...

  Both devices can ping eachothers WAN IP address (outside interfaces), but I don't see any traffic between the 2 sites. It seems that the tunnel is not open to everyone. When i PING from the local to the Remote LAN (which should be an interesting traffic for the tunnel...), the its IKEv1 remains empty...

  Am I missing something? I can't understand it more why same phase 1 is not engaged.

  You NAT won't. In your config file traffic is NATted initially and then does not match any more crypto ACL. You must move the rule dynamic NAT/PAT until the end of the table on two ASAs NAT:

   no nat (INSIDE,OUTSIDE) source dynamic any interface nat (INSIDE,OUTSIDE) after-auto source dynamic any interface

• move the local ip address to a different server (problem natting)

  Dear,

  I have a local database server with a local ip 192.168.101.3 and cisco ASA 5500, I use nat static as below:

  #static (Interior, exterior) xx.xx.xx.xx 192.168.101.3 netmask 255.255.255.255

  the server has been broken, and we moved the data to another server and give him the exact address of the intellectual property.

  Now we can ping the actual ip side.

  Help, please.

  Thanks in advance.

  Hello Asad,

  I've seen this problem before, hosts with the firewall or anti virus windows will not respond to any other host that is not on their Local network.

  Customer think usually it is a question of ASA, but as soon as we set up a NAT (OUTSIDE) 10 your_public_ip

  Global (inside) 10 interface;   We can see how it works because the server will now receive the packets of the SAA within the interface

  Anyway glad to hear it works fine.

  Please check the question as answered so future users can pull of this

  Julio

• Problem Natting PIX

  I have a question about the behavior of the PIX firewall. Recently, we had two similar cases that happened, one with PIXOS 6.1.5 and the other is with PIXOS 6.3.4. The phenomena of the problem is:

  There are two global pool and nat 2 corresponding to these 2 pools. A NAT is for all inside the subnet, and the other nat is to control certain host for translation, as shown below:

  Global (tgn) 1 1.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255

  Global (internet) 2 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 subnet mask

  NAT (inside) 1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (inside) 2 192.168.1.12 255.255.255.255

  NAT (inside) 2 192.168.1.15 255.255.255.255

  The purpose of these two NAT must only allow certain hosts to be able to access the Internet, while all guests can access to TGN. However, for hosts allowed to access the Internet, they can't access to TGN due to no translation under construction towards the top and the error message is "305006: portmap translation creation failed." After removing the nat 2, these special guests access to TGN, i.e. translation accumulates.

  Could someone tell me what is the reason for this problem? Could you also share with me the methodology of translation used by PIX firewall? No difficulty of Cisco in this issue?

  Thanks a lot for your kind explanations!

  This is correct behavior for what you have configured.

  For traffic flows by a downward revision to the safety interface, you need a pair of nat/global. The pair is designated by the number after the name of the interface brackets, in your case you have a pair of '1' and '2 '. Remember that nat statements are used on a specific game, then when the 192.168.1.12 traffic et.15 is perceived inside the interface, the PIX will choose ALWAYS the specific statement "nat (inside) 192.168.1.1x 2" for them, he done it before even to check the destination interface.

  Which means that if these two hosts are trying to go to the interface of tgn, they must have a corresponding statement of "global (tgn) 2..." to pair with their statement «nat (inside) 2...» Because that does not exist, they cannot go to that subnet.

  By removing the two individual statements nat, they began the "nat (inside) 1 192.168.1.0" statement because it's the next best match. This fact has a corresponding statement of "global (tgn) 1... ' matching and so traffic can flow properly.

  If you want to keep your config as is, then, for these two hosts to also access the interface of tgn, they will have the following text:

  NAT (inside) 1 192.168.1.12 255.255.255.255

  NAT (inside) 1 192.168.1.15 255.255.255.255

  If you simply want to allow all traffic inside tgn and have the inside hosts appear as their original IP addresses when he is on the tgn network, a better way would be to use a static as such:

  static (inside, tgn) 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  and then you can just have individual statements 'nat (inside) 2...' for the hosts you want to go to the Internet. Could make your config that is easier to read and save you have to add in two statements of nat for each host that has Internet access.

• After authentication LightRoom with serial number, with success, he tries to go through the process again when LR is launched

  I installed LightRoom and passed through the authentication process by entering the serial number (and I get the green check mark) and entered personal information.  When I click on "Finish", it seems everything is OK, but when I try to run LR it just makes me go all over to authenticate again.  Any suggestions?

  This is probably due to a problem with file permissions: Lightroom 3 is to launch into nonadministrator account number

  This applies to the versions other than 3 lr.