Public interface on VPN 3000

Similar Questions

• VPN client with counterpart on secondary ip address on the public interface of the router

  Hello

  On our office LAN, we have a Linux server than it hosting a VPN connection to a remote client.

  Do this to ISAKMP card on our Cisco router port connections to the internal ip address of the Linux host.

  However, we now want to allow our users to establish VPN connections to our local network using the unit of Cisco VPN Client.

  Of course, this would present challenges, as the ISAKMP our router port is mapped through an internal host.

  So, we tried to set up a secondary ip address on the router and VPN clients to connect to that.

  What we see in our newspapers is as follows:

  Phase 1 is very well established, and the VPN Client prompts the user for a user name and password.

  Authentication of the phase 2 starts, but the router says it's is not to receive a proposal of hash of the client.

  185 12:18:06.943 09/03/11 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000014
  RECEIVING< isakmp="" oak="" info="" *(hash,="" notify:no_proposal_chosen)="" from="">

  (in this case, where x.x.x.x is the secondary ip address on the public interface)

  After that, the Phase 1 SA is removed and the connection fails.

  My understanding is that the Phase 2 negotiation takes place with the ip address assigned to the client in Phase 1, which suggests that the problem occurs because the client communicates with the main on the interface ip address, and no secondary ip address.

  When remove us the mapping of port isakmp and the VPN client to connect to the primary ip address, everything works fine.

  Question:

  It is possible to establish 2 router VPN Client uses a secondary ip address?

  If not, is there some way I can implement the port mapping so that it occurs, the connection comes from a specific ip address?

  Garreth

  Should be supported on IOS.

  The command is crypto ctcp port...

  Check this link:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6635/ps6659/prod_white_paper0900aecd8061e2b3.html

  Federico.

• SSL VPN-3000 errors

  I get a "parse error" when you try to manually create an SSL certificate in the web interface of a VPN 3000; has anyone ever seen anything like that?

  Hi Chaplin,

  This is usually caused by the corruption of software certificate, you may need to call the TAC for specific steps to solve this problem.

  Kind regards

  Aamir Waheed,

  Cisco Systems, Inc.

  CCIE #8933

  -=-=-

• Disable the HTTP/HTTPS on public Interface Management

  I was able to do this on a VPN 3030 using the Configuration 3.6.7.F code running > Policy Management > traffic management > filters, select 'Public', click "Assign rules to filter", delete In incoming and Out for HTTP and HTTPS, then Save Config. I don't get the same behavior when I apply the same changes to a VPN 3030 running 4.1.7.F as I am still able to show management on the public interface. I want to keep managing HTTPS on the private interface.

  Hello

  Take a look in the folder 'WebVPN' under ' Configuration. Interfaces | Ethernet 2'. There you should find the point "Sessions allow management HTTPS.

  HTH

  Mark

• SNMP VPN 3000

  Hi all

  I'm not finding where to set the snmp over VPN 3000 community.

  I need read date of flow on Ethernet interfaces. but I'm able to get only VPN 3000 traps to an snmp system but I 'don't get read of snmp to VPN 3000 community.

  where and how I can setup the snmp over VPN 3000 community.

  Thank you

  It is under the following configuration section:

  Configuration | System | Management protocols. SNMP communities

  Hope that helps.

• How to configure VPN 3000 Concentrator for remote access

  I have inherited a VPN concentrator and want to configure it to provide remote access to my internal laboratory network when I'm traveling.  Private interface is configured as 192.168.1.240/24.  Public interface is configured as one of my public IP addresses.  I have a public IP pool on the back side of a cable modem Roadrunner.  I created a pool of addresses for clients such as 192.168.1.200 by 192.168.1.205.  I created all group configurations, group and user base.

  In the IP Routing tab, I see a default route pointing to my IP address of public gateway - the IP address of my box of roadrunner cable modem gateway.

  Since my VPN client, I am able to connect to the VPN concentrator.  I get an address from the pool and check the details of the tunnel under the statistics section shows IP address correct pool for the customer and the correct public IP address of my VPN reorga

  Jeff,

  According to statistics, it seems that the client sends traffic to the hub, but his answer not get back.

  We need check the hub settings itself.

  I need check the hub settings and that it is a GUI based device so I can't even ask to see the technology and the only option available is to WebEx.

  You're ok with webex, pls lemme session comfortable time id and e-mail to send the invitation, it takes no more time and we will carry it out

  Thank you

  Ankur

• LAN-to-LAN tunnel between VPN 3000 and Cisco 1721

  Hello

  I have a current LAN-to-LAN tunnel configuration between VPN 3000 (3.6) and Cisco 1721 (12.2 (11) T).

  When I use the encryption = authentication and Des-56 = ESP\MD5\HMAC-128 for the IPSec Security Association, everything works fine.

  However, I would like to Turn off encryption for some time getting the speed improvements, so I changed

  Encryption = null esp (in 1721) and to "null" in VPN-3000.

  Now the tunnel is setup but I can spend only ICMP traffic. When I pass the traffic UDP\TCP the message below appears the Cisco 1721

  % C1700_EM-1-ERROR: error in packet-rx: pad size error, id 75, hen offset 0

  Has anyone seen this behavior?

  All those put in place an IPSec Tunnel with only the ESP authentication and NO encryption between VPN-3000 and Cisco 1721?

  Thanx------Naman

  Naman,

  Disable you the vpn Accelerator? "no accel crypto engine. Sure that you can't do with a null module vpn.

  Kurtis Durrett

• VPN 3000 RRI

  Hi guys,.

  I'm working on the creation of a vpn between a vpn 3000 and a

  point of control, the problem I have on the vpn3000 is that if I do not have

  Select "reverse road injection" it won't establish the vpn.

  I thought she might have because the roads of local lan did not exist

  on the vpn 3000, so I added static to match the list of the network, but it

  still wouldn't go out, as soon as I activate the reverse road injection it

  works very well.

  any ideas?

  Thank you

  Adam Baxter.

  Adam,

  Take out the static routes and also injection Road opposite say-able.

  Activate the logs on the hub of gravity 1-13 for IPSEC & IPSECDBG, IKE, AUTH, IKEDBG, AUTHDBG.

  Try to send a ping to the interesting traffic. Capture logs and send them to this post, let me take a look and see if there is a question that jumps.

  See you soon

  Gilbert

• Cisco ACS 5.4 and VPN 3000

  Hello

  I'm trying to use CIsco ACS 5.4 for RADIUS authentication for VPN by using VPN concentrator 3000 users.

  I added the VPN 3000 on ACS and added GBA on VPN group with a shared secret authentication server. When I do a test on the authentication server using the local account that I created on ACS it happens as no response was received from the server so that I can see the RAIDUS AAuth in green.

  Any help would be much appreciated.

  Concerning

  AR

  Hey,.

  What is the report on GBA?

  "RAIDUS AAuth in green"

  If so, a pcap help between the two.

  Concerning

  Ed

• Console Cable - Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator

  Where can I get a cable from the console to the Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator? The place I bought the hub of not sent me one with it.

  Thank you

  JP

  JP,

  Console port for the concentrator vpn being complient rs-232, you can buy two female DB9 to RJ45 / adapters, one for the concetrator and one for the PC to use in the COM1 port, then use a regular straight through CAT5 cable, that's the way I do and it is convenient as suppose to use the straight through serial rs-232 cable.

  http://www.sealevel.com/product_detail.asp?product_id=787

  With regard to the regular cable this hub comes with you can use it.

  http://www.stonewallcable.com/product.asp?Dept%5Fid=35&PF%5Fid=SC%2DS9%2DFF

  Adidtional information for your initial hub seup -.

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/VPN/vpn3000/3_6/getting/gs2inst.htm#1050260

  Concerning

  PLS rate useful posts

• L2l IPSec VPN 3000 and PIX 501

  Hello

  I have a remote site that has a broadband internet connection and uses a PIX 501.  We wanted to connect them with our main office using our VPN 3000 via VPN site-to-site.

  I followed the following documentation:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration_example09186a00800949d2.shtml#tshoot

  However the L2L session does not appear on the hub when I check the active sessions.

  The network diagram, as well as the PIX config and the screenshots of the VPN configuration for the IPSec-L2L tunnel is attached.

  Any help or advice are appreciated.

  I just noticed that the PIX firewall, the phase 1 paramateres are not configured. You must configure the same PASE 1 and phase 2 settings on both ends of the tunnel.

  For example, on CVPN 3000, you have configured settings Phase 1 as 3DES, pre-shared key etc... We have the same configuration on the PIX firewall too.

  Here is an example of sample config

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_configuration_example09186a00800949d2.shtml

  I hope this helps!

• Network VPN 3000 list

  I keep to err msge "mask/area bad ip address/subnet mask/generic id" when you attempt to add a class C network to the list a VPN 3000 Concentrator using the CLI. Here's my entry 192.168.51.0/0.0.0.255. The number and the wildcard mask seem ok. Isn't the right syntax?

  Vincent, you're very welcome and thank you for the update... happy all worked... Please rate as solved post.

  Rgds BST

  Jorge

• VPN between a PIX and a VPN 3000

  I'm trying to set up a VPN between PIX and a VPN 3000. All configurations are complete, but the tunnel has not been established. On the PIX, to 'see the crypto engine' and ' show isakmp his ' orders, I do not see the tunnel. Of "show ipsec his ' command, I can see the mistakes"#send"continues to increase when I try to connect to the remote network. Here is the copy - paste command:

  Tag crypto map: myvpnmap, local addr. 10.70.24.2

  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.70.24.128/255.255.255.128/0/0)

  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (10.96.0.0/255.224.0.0/0/0)

  current_peer: 10.70.16.5:0

  LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},

  #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts 0 digest

  #pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts check 0

  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0

  #pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0, #pkts decompress failed:

  #send 12, #recv errors 0

  local crypto endpt. : 10.70.24.2, remote Start crypto. : 10.70.16.5

  Path mtu 1500, fresh ipsec generals 0, media, mtu 1500

  current outbound SPI: 0

  SAS of the esp on arrival:

  the arrival ah sas:

  SAS of the CFP on arrival:

  outgoing esp sas:

  outgoing ah sas:

  outgoing CFP sas:

  Obviously, the PIX identifies protected traffic but failed to establish the tunnel. I was wondering what could be the reason for these kind of mistakes? That means them growing '#send errors?

  Thank you very much!

  Sending error mean simply the PIX is grateful to encrypt this traffic, but there is no built tunnel and so it must drop the package.

  you will need to look at why the tunnel is not under construction however, "sending error" are just a byproduct of some other configuration issue. On the PIX, it looks like you would have something like:

  Crypto ip 10.70.24.128 access list allow 255.255.255.128 10.96.0.0 255.224.0.0

  On the 3000 under the L2L section and the Local and remote network, you need the exact opposite of the latter, then it would be:

  / Local network mask = 10.96.0.0/0.31.255.255

  / Remote network mask = 10.70.24.128/0.0.0.127

  If you have something else the tunnel will fail to come. Otherwise, we see that the Cryptography debugs the PIX and the trunk of the 3000 when the tunnel is built.

• VPN 3000 software issue?

  Hi all

  I have a question about the software for the VPN 3000 goes on the side of cisco, the new 4.2.7.I of 3 August 2006, I found last week, and now I found a newer version with vpn3000 - 4.1.7.O - k9.bin on August 15, 2006.

  It's a bit confusing to me.

  can someone explain to me what to use for a VPN Conc 3030 with 128 MB mem?

  Thanks in advance

  Klaus

  What is your server VPN hardware part number if it takes support 3DES, you can use vpn3000 - 4.1.7.O - k9.bin no. otherwise.

• PPTP VPN 3000

  Hello world

  It is possible more make a VPN Tunnel from a single address IP VPN 3000 using the protcol PPTP?

  because what attempt trevaler of my company to connect from the same IP (valid Internet) is not working. for example, when they all are within any society, it is only a valid IP address on the Internet only a VPN tunnel is possible VPN 3000

  I need more than one connection from a single address IP VPN 3000 using the PPTP protcol

  It is possible?

  Thank you

  Yes, it is possible on the VPN3000 himself, however, most of the time the problem is on the network device so that they cross where they are attempting to connect from. Some device/network firewall they pass through does not support several PPTP connections. Will they have for example an ASA firewall, then they will have to turn on PPTP inspection:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/command/reference/i2.html#wp1721656

  In short, the problem is not on your VPN3000 but on the network where are made the PPTP connections from.

  Hope it's a no-brainer.