Public static PAT in Nat/Global conflicts

Similar Questions

• Public static political static NAT in conflict with NAT VPN

  I have a situation where I need to create a VPN site-to site between an ASA 5505 using IOS 7.2 and a Sonicwall NSA4500. The problem arises where the LAN behind the Cisco ASA has the same subnet an existing VPN currently created on the Sonicwall. Since the Sonicwall cannot have two VPN both run on the same subnet, the solution is to use policy NAT on the SAA as well as for the Sonicwall, the new VPN seems to have a different subnet.

  The current subnet behind the ASA is 192.168.10.0/24 (The Sonicwall already has a private network virtual created for another customer with the same subnet). I try to translate it to 192.168.24.0/24. The peer LAN (behind the Sonicwall) is 10.159.0.0/24. The ASA relevant configuration is:

  interface Vlan1

  IP 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0

  access extensive list ip 192.168.24.0 outside_1_cryptomap allow 255.255.255.0 10.159.0.0 255.255.255.0

  list of access VPN extended permit ip 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.159.0.0 255.255.255.0

  public static 192.168.24.0 (inside, outside) - list of VPN access

  card crypto outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap

  In addition, there are other static NAT instructions and their associated ACLs that allow certain traffic through the firewall on the server, for example:

  public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface smtp SERVER smtp netmask 255.255.255.255

  The problem is this: when I enter the static strategy statement NAT, I get the message ' WARNING: real-address conflict with existing static "and then it refers to each of the static NAT statements reflecting the external address to the server. I've thought about it, and it seemed to me that the problem was that policy NAT statement must be the first statement of NAT (it is the last one) so that it is run first and all traffic destined to the VPN to the Sonicwall (destination 10.159.0.0/24) tunnel would be properly treated. If I left him as the last statement, then the other static NAT statements would prevent a part of the 10.159.0.0/24 network-bound traffic to be correctly routed through the VPN.

  So, I tried first to my stated policy NAT upward in the ASDM GUI interface. However, moving the declaration was not allowed. Then I tried to delete the five static NAT statements that point to the server (an example is above) and then recreate them, hoping that would then move up the policy statement NAT. This also failed.

  What Miss me?

  Hello

  I assumed that we could have changed the order of the 'static' , the original orders, but as it did not work for some reason any then it seems to me that you suggested or change, that I proposed should work.

  I guess that your purpose was to set up static political PAT for the VPN for some these services, then static PAT of public network access, then static NAT to policy for the rest of the network in-house.

  I guess you could choose any way seems best for you.

  Let me know if get you it working. I always find it strange that the original configuration did not work.

  Remember to mark a reply as the answer if it answered your question.

  Feel free to ask more if necessary

  -Jouni

• public static nat/global vs

  Excluding an access list, what is the difference between:

  NAT (inside) 1 172.16.5.10 net 255.255.255.255

  192.168.5.10 (outside) 1 global net 255.255.255.255

  and

  static (inside, outside) 1 192.168.5.10 172.16.5.10 net 255.255.255.255

  Thank you.

  in static reality must be combined with the access list for a two-way communication... You are right in a sense that

  public static nat/global access-list =

  Basically, the rule is that the traffic is allowed more high to low infterface of default security

  BUT

  from the lowest to the highest security of communication you need an access as well as the STATIC list

  Thank you

  Nadeem

• Can I use the address of the public by peers as PAT or NAT address also?

  With the help of an ASA 5505, I've only private local network IPs and a public IP address from my ISP for the address of the peer. Can I use this same internal peers like PAT or NAT for my private IP local IP address?  Remote VPN location policy is to not allow IP addresses private on their local network, so that they want public addresses to me. If possible, could you please show me an example of a config 5505 simple using the following IP addresses? (I need not the IPSec configuration, only the ACL/NAT config)

  I have four hosts who need to access a device at the remote location via an IPSec tunnel.  They are:

  local hosts:

  192.168.2.10, 11, 12, 13

  Say my public address peer is 205.188.15.34 and the remote peer is 175.10.144.52

  remote host:

  168.12.10.6

  Thanks for any help.

  jkeeffe wrote:
  Using an ASA-5505, I only have private IPs on the local LAN and one public IP address from my ISP for the peer address. Can I use that same peer IP address as a PAT or NAT for my internal local private IPs?  The remote VPN location policy is to not allow private IP address on to their local network, so they want public addresses from me. If that is possible, could you please show me a simple 5505 config example using the following IPs? (I don't need the IPSec config, only the ACL/NAT config)
  I have four hosts that need to access a device at the remote location via an IPSec tunnel.  They are:
  local hosts:
  192.168.2.10, 11, 12, 13
  Say my public peer address is 205.188.15.34 and the remote peer is 175.10.144.52
  remote host:
  168.12.10.6
  thanks for any help.
  

  Yes you can do it.

  the localhosts object-group network

  the object-network 192.168.2.10 host

  host of the object-Network 192.168.2.11

  etc...

  list the host 168.12.10.6 ip object-group localhosts allowed VPN access

  NAT (inside) 1 VPN access list

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  Crypto-map list would then look like this-

  VPNTRAFFIC ip host 205.188.15.34 access list permit 168.12.10.6

  One thing to note. The NAT example above is political NAT IE. If the source is-> 13 192.168.2.10 and the destination is 168.12.10.6 then the source to the public IP 205.188.15.34 NAT. However you may already have something like this in your config file-

  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  That is to say. you're natting all your addresses private to the public interface address for internet access in general. If you don't have that then there is no need to do NAT policy and you can't miss those lines that source addresses will be Natted anyway.

  the localhosts object-group network

  the object-network 192.168.2.10 host

  host of the object-Network 192.168.2.11

  etc...

  
  

  list the host 168.12.10.6 ip object-group localhosts allowed VPN access

  
  

  NAT (inside) 1 VPN access list

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  Jon

• Rule static versus Globan1 & NAT rule

  Hello

  If I have a combination of static address translation and a global address translation & nat at the same public ip address, which rule takes precedence. Global or static & NAT.

  It is a purely academic question.

  Thanks in advance.

  Concerning

  CP

  Hello

  Static takes precedence, then nat0 with access-list and nat/global, then then nat0

  Thank you

  Nadeem

• Static and dynamic NAT at the same time?

  Is this possible? Let's say you have 20 public address pool and you have 30 computers LAN. You want to assign the same public address for some of the servers. And the rest can get the addresses of the pool at random.

  It would be nice if we can easily do the appropriate firewall rules.

  Yes, it is possible, you can use nat and global commands for dynamic conversion and use the static commands for static translation at the same time.

  Here is an example:

  Public rate IP-range outdoors: xxx.xxx.xxx.0/27

  (IP addresses are xxx.xxx.xxx.1 - xxx.xxx.xxx.30)

  Private range of IP addresses on the inside: yyy.yyy.yyy.0/24

  In the example I'm going to static translate xxx.xxx.xxx.2 to yyy.yyy.yyy.2 Server1 (ditto for server2, but by using adresse.3)

  All other IP addresses is translated dynamics.

  Here is an example of how you can do this:

  IP address outside xxx.xxx.xxx.1 255.255.255.224

  IP address yyy.yyy.yyy.1 255.255.255.0 inside

  NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep

  NAT (inside) 1 yyy.yyy.yyy.0 255.255.255.0

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  public static yyy.yyy.yyy.2 xxx.xxx.xxx.2 (indoor, outdoor)

  public static yyy.yyy.yyy.3 xxx.xxx.xxx.3 (indoor, outdoor)

  access-list deny ip host yyy.yyy.yyy.2 sheep all

  access-list deny ip host yyy.yyy.yyy.3 sheep all

  access-list sheep ip allow a whole

  Kind regards

  Leo

• Vs static PAT

  A network architecture looks like this: PIX firewall, inside private public static IP (192.168.1.1) and the local network of private static IP 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0, outside (only one address available public IP, for example, 172.18.124.216).

  For the guests of LAN access to the outside as the internet, of course, a CARESS is necessary. That's a lot for a single translation.

  Now for everything outside hosts to access inside web server for example 192.168.1.2, licensed and the translation of intellectual property must be made. Usually, the translation will say:

  static (inside, outside) tcp 172.18.124.216 www 192.168.1.2 www netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  (1) as I understand it, from inside to outside is PAT, many-to-one, while from outside to inside is one-to-one static translation. Is this correct? How could the two many-to-one, and one co-exist on the same PIX?

  (2) what the last two 0's to the statement above (0 0) Static?

  Thank you for helping.

  Scott

  Yes, you already have the idea.

  --> inside outside, pat

  --> outside inside, 1-1 (port forwarding)

  PIX can handle these two translation as they work in a particular direction. When pix receives a packet destined for the internet from the inside, it is mapped to the pat statement because the stream is insid--> out; Otherwise, when pix receives a packet from outside, it will match the static port forwarding instruction. again, it works because of the leadership.

  regarding the second concern, these two 0 see max_conns and emb_limit respectively.

  According to the pix command line reference,.

  max_conns means the simultaneous maximum number of tcp and udp for the whole subnet connections; Whereas emb_limit means the maximum embryonic connections per host.

  in other words, these parameters can be used as a countermeasure to attack back.

• {} Public static

  Boy, it is difficult in 53 and feeling totally stupid, but Java can do it for me.

  I; have my head wrapped around statics and constants and static methods, and I found (thankfully) one of the examples which allowed me to analyze step by step to better understahnd the language (it's my best course).

  However, it baffles me: things wrapped in JUST {} public static.  I've been Googling like crazy, but all the explanations are either variables or class, not fopr this thing.

  Here is an example of the MemoryDemo example I discuss:

  // Statics -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  private static Random _random;  To generate random numbers for dates and channels.
  private static ubyte [] _letters; To generate random strings.
     
  // Constants -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  private static final int MIN_STRING_LENGTH = 3;   Minimum length for a random string.
  private static final int MAX_STRING_LENGTH = 10;  Maximum length of random string.
     
  public static
  {
  _random = new Random();
  _letters = new ubyte [MAX_STRING_LENGTH];
  }
  

  So, I understand not statements made by the statics and constants... no problemo.

  But what is the reasoning behind the encapsulating the _random and _letters inside the {} public static?  Is it just a kind of shorthand for something else?

  Again, I apologize for what must seem like stupid question, but I don't want to jump on something that I think moight be crucial to understand.  Thanks in advance (again)!

  -John

  I don't see why initialization that you see in this class could not be done as you suggest.

  However, there are other situations where this isn't the case.

  For example not elegant and simple (there are other better ways to dong that), you can have a static value that identifies whether the device is a touch screen,

  If you have

  public static boolean IS_TOUCH_SCREEN;

  public as well as any other class can test this just by using .IS_TOUCH_SCREEN

  {public static

  String pattern = DeviceInfo.getDeviceName ();

  If [(model.startsWith("95"))

  IS_TOUCH_SCREEN = true;

  } else {}

  IS_TOUCH_SCREEN = false;

  }

• PhoneListener cannot access a public static vars initialized in the main thread

  Using the emulator (SDK 4.7, phone model 9500)

  I have a class PhoneListener defined and recorded, he gets the phone events without any problems. It's all public static public var that is initialized in the main thread is always null when it is examined in the context of the PhoneListener callback thread, when examined in the main thread or a son they are defined.

  I guess since the PhoneListener callbacks are called from a system thread, it cannot access the battery of my request - it seems correct? is this in any way about this?

  I tried Application.getApplication () .invokeLater (...), but validated all executable from the PhoneListener recalled suffers from the same problem.

  Thanks - Lindsay

  Exactly, that's what I was wondering - I found the answer according to the PhoneListener in the MIDlet . Now I store my UiApplication object in the running store and access them from the PhoneLister to publish objects on my main application via invokeLater.

  Thank you

  Lindsay

• public static problem (inside, outside)

  I use a PIX to isolate a subnet to a corporate network.

  inside is the corporate network

  outside is not approved LAN

  A single user in LAN not approved need to go to a specific set of IP addresses in

  And all other users can browse the Internet via downstream

  proxy server to talk to the corporate proxy server

  It works fine,

  Why I can't use the static suite for this

  public static 159.182.111.0 (Interior, exterior) 159.182.111.0 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  problem is that I have to continue to add each ip address static statement such as

  public static 159.182.111.50 (Interior, exterior) 159.182.111.50 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  public static 159.182.111.60 (Interior, exterior) 159.182.111.60 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  public static 159.182.111.70 (Interior, exterior) 159.182.111.70 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  public static 159.182.111.80 (Interior, exterior) 159.182.111.80 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  Unfortunately this site VIEW use different IP addresses in the subnet, everyday

  Is any limitation of this ststic command at the low security access

  interface high security by using the static command

  Hi, I don't know, but the problem may be in the netmask in your static instruction,

  It must be 255.255.255.0 or so because it is a network and not a host.

  hope this helps.

• Public static long serialversion uid in doubt?

  Salvation in serializable classes we are declaring the serialversion as ' private public static long ' field. but when the object is serialized static values don't are not serialized, so at the other end when we are deserializing how the virtual machine works Java checks whether the serialvesrsion when it is serialized is the same as serialvesrsion in the class, when it is deserialized?

  It happened again, but not as part of a serialized instance.

• Public static LOV

  Hello!
  (Version 4.0.2 of the APEX)
  
  I need definition LOV that returns multiple values for a display value. For example, when I select the return value TV is 1, when I select RADIO return value is 2. And when I select what I want to return to the 1 and 2 values.
  
  List of values definition should be something like this:
  
  STATIC: All; (1,2), TV, 1, RADIO, 2
  
  Is this possible? Without any plugin, like SuperLov...
  
  Thank you!

  Dark salvation,

  Maybe this thread could help?

  Public static LOV

  Kind regards
  Sandro

• public static function return an object instance

  create or replace
  Item_object OBJECT TYPE IS
  (item_title VARCHAR2 (60))
  , item_subtitle VARCHAR2 (60)
  FUNCTION CONSTRUCTOR item_object
  RETURN SELF AS RESULT
  FUNCTION CONSTRUCTOR item_object
  (item_title VARCHAR2, VARCHAR2 item_subtitle) RETURN SELF AS RESULT
  , Public STATIC FUNCTION get_item_object (item_id NUMBER) ITEM_OBJECT RETURN
  MEMBER RETURN VARCHAR2 to_string FUNCTION)
  CANNOT BE INSTANTIATED NOT FINAL;
  
  
  create or replace
  TYPE item_object BODY IS
  Item_object FUNCTION CONSTRUCTOR RETURN self AS RESULT IS
  point ITEM_OBJECT: = item_object ('generic Title', 'Generic subtitle');
  BEGIN
  me: = item;
  RETURN;
  END item_object;
  Item_object FUNCTION CONSTRUCTOR
  (item_title VARCHAR2, VARCHAR2 item_subtitle)
  RETURN SELF AS RESULT IS
  BEGIN
  Self.item_title: = item_title;
  Self.item_subtitle: = item_subtitle;
  RETURN;
  END item_object;
  * STATIC FUNCTION get_item_object (item_id NUMBER) RETURN ITEM_OBJECT IS
  point ITEM_OBJECT;
  CURSOR c (NUMBER item_id_in) IS
  SELECT item_title, item_subtitle FROM point WHERE item_id is item_id_in;
  BEGIN
  I'm IN c (item_id) LOOP
  agenda: = item_object (i.item_title, i.item_subtitle);
  END LOOP;
  RETURN of goods;
  END get_item_object; *
  FUNCTION MEMBER to_string RETURN VARCHAR2 IS
  BEGIN
  RETURN ' ['|] [Self.item_title |'] ['|| [Self.item_subtitle |'] " ;
  END to_string;
  END;
  
  Impossible to compile static function get_item_object, can anyone help me please?

  user6446424 wrote:
  all instances of the object, as all the rows in the table

  I think you misuderstand objects. Objects do not come from thin air - it must exist somewhere or should be constructed from the data. Your function constructs the table utem data object. If you have any item in the table, which should be used?

  SY.

• public static const even as public static var

  Is it the same thing to use

  public static const

  as

  public static var

  technically, no.

  a const value cannot be changed.  value of var can be changed.

• Public static var - quick question

  Gidday

  Slowly converting my calendar code AIR dekstop app to OOP, and I'm at the part where I am loading in the user settings in a SQL table.

  I was wondering, is a public static var one good thing to use for holding user settings?

  I thought I had a class UserSettings user settings that may be held to get and set as they are needed or changed.

  Click Save, I can just walk them and save them in SQL.

  And all my classes can access them if necessary.

  Or is there a better way?

  See you soon

  Be more specific on what is YipeeClass and what he really needs. YippeeClass probably doesn't have access to all settings variables.

  For example, if YippeeClass is a point of view, he's probably just things it is designed to show. Provide you (getters/setters) properties on the view and then your main class for the Document (or better yet, a controller class dedicated) looked at the settings and fill in the properties of the display according to relevant parameters. Don't worry the Document class on how these parameters affect the view - it will be now responsible for displaying to translate the properties in any way (for example, to set the text of a text field). This is known as Dependency Injection.

  If the user interacts with the view in a way that impact parameters, send you an event to the view which is intercepted by a controller or the main document class and that class then will bring the necessary changes to the settings.

  Classes should always know the strict minimum necessary to accomplish all that they are directly responsible, and each class should be responsible for something.  I suggest you get the book associated with the links I posted: Actionscript 3 Design Patterns. At least she would give you a framework to think about such things.