Public vs private

Similar Questions

• I need to create public and private keys for the security certificate and I can not find the certificate. Where is he?

  I bought a security certificate, and the site tells me that it has been installed successfully. I need to export the certificate so that I can create public and private keys, but I can't find the certificate to do so.

  Firefox (Firefox Orange) > Options > Options > advanced > Certificates > authorities > export

• Telepresence Content Server: Dissemination to the Public and private users

  *****

  Infrastructure:

  TMS 14.5 (private network)

  VCS - C 8.5.1 (private network)

  VCS-E 8.5.1 (Public network)

  S5.3 TCS (private network)

  Codian: Supervisor 8500, MSE 8510, 8321 ISDN (private network)

  *****

  New to this, so I don't know what would be the best way to do this, but basically the goal is to broadcast videos of TCS to the users of the network internal as live audiences without security problems. Try to do this without an external broadcast service.

  It is the State that works very well for internal users, but is not available to public users because it's on a private network.

  Any help is greatly appreciated.

  Thank you
  Mike

  You will need to provide public access to your Cameras, you can consult the administration of CHT Guide for a list of ports. We have our TCS on a private network and have the lanes of traffic through the network load balancers that rely on the public network to provide all access public and private.

• How to get the public and private keys to use recaptcha?

  I registered with google to get a recaptcha for my Web site. I've gotten has been the key to site and the secret key! If I need to get the public and private key for muse!

  Hello

  Please use the site as a 'public key'key key and Secret as "clΘ privΘe".

  Concerning

  Vivek

• No saved reports - no Public Option / private

  I created a new application with several interactive reports.  However, when my users click on save report, there is no option to make the saved report, public or private, as indicated in the documentation.  I have it configured incorrectly?

  Thank you.

  Under the documentation:

  Tip:

  To save a public report, the developer must select Save Report Public must be selected under include in the Actions Menu on the report attributes page. Developers can also apply for authorization scheme to enable or disable save the Public report. See "Customizing the search report interactive bar".

  So, it is possible that you don't have this game in your configuration of application report...

  Thank you

  Tony Miller

  Software LuvMuffin

  Blog: https://apex1.revion.com/pls/apex/f?p=217:1:P1_ARTICLE:

• Generate public and private keys within the smart card

  Hi all
  
  I use this code to generate public and private keys within the smart card.
  
  KeyPair kp = new pair of keys (KeyPair.ALG_RSA_CRT, KeyBuilder.LENGTH_RSA_512);
  kp.genKeyPair ();
  PrivateKey prikey = kp.getPrivate ();
  PublicKey pubkey = kp.getPublic ();
  
  This code runs without error.
  
  I need to obtain the public key of the smart card. So I need to get the public key to a byte array.
  But I can't get these keys in array of bytes of plain text.
  
  The methods I can get for pubkey object are
  
  pubkey.clearKey ();
  pubkey. Equals (obj);
  pubkey.getSize ();
  pubkey.getType ();
  pubkey.isInitialized (); only these.
  
  I use
  Eclipse Version: 3.4.1 (level of agreement of the compiler = 1.4)
  Jcop plugin (to connect with the real map and to test the java code in virtual card provided by JCOP)
  OmniKey5321 (characters without contact) card reader
  
  What is the reason to get those above methods pubkey object? Is it a version problem?
  How can I get the public key in ordinary byte array? Is this possible?
  If it is not possible, is there a way to get the public key as a certificate of export or something another solution?
  
  If my script is not a possible strategy, how can I use private public keys to send the applet-specific data? Is there a better way to do it?
  
  Published by: 863766 on June 6, 2011 12:16 AM

  RSAPublicKey pubkey = kp.getPublic();
  

  then

  pubkey.getExponent(...); pubkey.getModulus(...);
  

• Oracle synonyms: public or private

  The LiveCycle installation instructions specify that for the creation and initial filling of the database THESAURUS 'CREATE' privilege is necessary. I presume this means LK who actually will use to create synonyms. The DBA is now whether these synonyms will be public or private, and I can't find in the documentation. Could someone advice?

  Can you share the URL where it is documented and the version of database you set up? In line with the preparation for installation , the Oracle user account must have the following privileges:

  • CREATE SEQUENCES
  • CREATE VIEW
  • UNLIMITED TABLESPACE
  • CREATE TABLE
  • CREATE THE CLUSTER
  • CREATE SESSION

  ~ Vishal

• CM500 and CM600 public or private IP assigned to the router?

  I would like to use my router port forwarding for remote access to devices on my local network such as IP cameras. I know that with a built-in modem/router, that this can be done - I have it working now.

  Will be working with a router and a separate modem transfer port? The reason I ask, is that, in my opinion, most modems assign a private attached router IP address and not the public IP address. What I want to know is:
  1 - CM500/600 modems have the ability to assign the public IP address to a router?
  2 - port forwarding will still work when a router has been assigned an IP address private? I'm not a network expert, but conceptually the modem converts public IP + port x private IP + port x?
  3. when a router is configured to send the WAN IP of a dynamic DNS service address to send it assigns a private IP address or does it have the ability to determine the public IP address and send it?

  Thank you

  If you are on the network from Time-warner, they should assign a public IP address and for example if you connect CM500 Cable modem with a router R7000, thr router will receive the public IP address and you won't have a double NAT situation.

  I didn't know what ISP you had service with. some ISPS in Asia provides private users IP addresses, and it will create double NAT situation.

  I have not seen any ISP so far providing US with private IP addresses, but I've only worked with Time Warner and Comcasts. Not sure about smaller players.

• Is Windows Live Photo Gallery PUBLIC or PRIVATE when you use?

  Hi, I hope you can help me please... Windows Live Photos LIVE allowing the public to see all your photos or is it private until you do public iy? IM really confused... I WLPG and recently I wanted to download to another computer and it put other peoples photos in my Gallery... which I did, can you please tell me? I don't want my public photos, I just need to use it as an editot and organize, thank you very much!

  Hi, I hope you can help me please... Windows Live Photos LIVE allowing the public to see all your photos or is it private until you do public iy? IM really confused... I WLPG and recently I wanted to download to another computer and it put other peoples photos in my Gallery... which I did, can you please tell me? I don't want my public photos, I just need to use it as an editot and organize, thank you very much!

  It is private until you want to not to share with others, but if you want to share with others or to the general public you can easily do so. You must sign in with your Windows Live id ID to share your photos in SkyDrive, Flickr, Facebook and YouTube.

• 2600 NAT outside public to private inside addresses

  I would like to put servers with private addresses at disposal of guests (with public addresses) on the other side a router. Can someone give me a pointer?

  TIA

  you want to configure static NAT.

  Suppose that 10.10.1.5 is the server inside and 193.234.211.12 is your free external IP. Joanie configure this line:

  ' ip nat inside source static 10.10.1.5 193.234.211.12.

  And all those who will have access to the external IP address will go to internal (static nat)

  see you soon

  Robert

• Public and private IPs on the same Interface by using NAT Exemption/policy NAT

  I'm looking for some feedback on whether my thoughts on the installation program will run.

  Equipment: PIX 515E 6.2 (2)

  Scenario:

  The inside interface of the PIX will host 3 blocks of addresses IP - 24 public 2 blocks and 1 private/16 block. (All IP addresses have been replaced by dummy blocks.)

  Blocks of audiences:

  * 192.168.10.0/24

  * 192.168.20.0/24

  Block of private:

  * 10.50.0.0/16

  Traffic from the public 2/24 blocks should go through the firewall without address translation.

  The two blocs of the public will be able to receive connections initiated from the Internet.

  Public blocks will need to be able to send and receive traffic on a static VPN tunnel to our headquarters without subject to address translation

  Traffic leaving the sector private/16 block should be subjected to PAT before passing through the firewall.

  Private/block 16 will not receive incoming traffic from the Internet (other than responses to outbound connections initiated from within the private block).

  However, the private block will also have to be able to send and receive traffic on a static VPN tunnel to our headquarters * without * subject to address translation (i.e. hosts on our corporate network must be able to initiate connections to the private block and vice versa).

  The inside interface of the PIX will be connected to a Catalyst 3xxx series layer 3 switch, which will be responsible for routing all internal (so the PIX will never be routing of traffic on the interface, it was received).

  My ideas on how to implement are:

  * Use the exemption of NAT to exempt public address translation blocks. This will allow incoming and outgoing connections through the firewall.

  * Use the exemption of NAT to exempt the block private NAT when connecting to our head office on the VPN tunnel.

  * Use policy NAT w / PAT to translate the block private connecting to all other hosts.

  I have translated these thoughts in the following configuration snippet.

  Because the NAT exemption is processed before policy NAT in the evaluation of the NAT rules, I believe that this should allow the public IP blocks treat incoming/outgoing traffic without translation, while submitting the private translation block (except during handling of incoming/outgoing connections to our network of corporate office).

  Can someone confirm my assumptions about this?

  # ----------------------------------------------------------------------

  traffic of # which should be exempted from translation

  permit ip 192.168.10.0 access list nat_exempt 255.255.255.0 any

  nat_exempt 192.168.20.0 ip access list allow 255.255.255.0 any

  nat_exempt ip 10.50.0.0 access list allow 255.255.0.0 10.100.0.0/16

  traffic of # which should be the subject of translation

  policy_nat ip 10.50.0.0 access list allow 255.255.0.0 any

  # Suppose 192.168.5.1 is the address to use for PAT

  Global (outside) 1 192.168.5.1

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access nat_exempt

  NAT (inside) 1 access-list policy_nat

  # assumes that 192.168.10.7 is the IP address of the inside layer 3 switch

  Route inside 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.7 1

  Route inside 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.7 1

  Route inside 10.50.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.10.7 1

  #assume the following configuration sections appear elsewhere: static tunnel VPN, ACL, ifconfig, etc..

  # ----------------------------------------------------------------------

  Yes, this will work, even if you don't need political NAT for the 10.50.0.0 network. For PAT the 10.50.0.0 network when to anywhere (except via VPN) just do:

  Global 1 192.168.15.1 (outside)

  NAT (inside) 1 10.50.0.0 255.255.0.0

  As I said, you have works perfectly, the above is just an easier way to do it.

• Choose a profile Public or Private Network?

  Am I right in thinking that the more secure option for a network is Public in windows 8?

  Only, I have a PC desktop that is connected to a router and a printer.

  Installing Windows missed me a private network setting. Should I change this in a framework of Public network or is it not really necessary?

  Am I being too cautious?

  Hello

  Means of private connections you'll have some active options by default for example sharing file and printer sharing, private means that you do not. It is recommended to use private house connections to ensure when you buy another system they can reach eachother.
  It is recommended that use you Public in cafes, trains, McDonald's and so on, to ensure that nobody can open a connection to your system and look at your files.
  So in theory I would say that the private home use, there is no need to worry about the aslong that others do not have access to your network, which they shouldn't have...
  Hope this helps you
  Yuri
  This is my own opinion and does not reflect the opinions of others.

• public vs private vs. protected (readonly properties?)

  Hello
  Is it possible to have a property in AS3, which is public but read-only? A bit like the .x and there properties of UI components, I would like to set a property in a custom class that can be accessible to the public, but not changed outside the instance.
  
  Thank you
  Cliff
  

  Yes, that's what get and pre-programmed for functions:

  private var _x:Number;
  funcion public get x(): number {return this ._x ;}}
  private void set x(newX:number): void {this ._x = agree ;}

  now, you can call objectwiththatProperty.x to read,
  set of cant it you will get error saying: property is read-only.

• Port of public to private ip address mapping

  I'm trying to change a netopia router in Bridge mode and put a UTM5 behind the bridge newly netopia.

  I see in the netopia there are several IP cards that take some of the assigned public addresses and direct them to addresses internal ip. I need to know if this is possible on the UTM5. I added the other public IP addresses on the Wan as well as the default.

  I need to do the following (example used IPs):

  64.129.001.001--> 192.168.1.151
  64.219.001.002--> 192.168.1.152
  64.219.001.003--> 192.168.1.153
  etc...

  Someone at - it any information on how to get this feature within the UTM5

  Hmm ok, thanks for the info.

  From what I see and read, when the Netopia is placed in bridge mode, it erases all the Routing and IPMaps out unfortunately, so why I think that the UTM5 should do the mapping.

  Granted I'm not very familiar with the characteristics of the Netopia and this is an old old installation. Just buying some time before the line is replaced by a more stable connection.

  UPDATE:

  Looks like that the Netopia is mapped correctly because I deleted an IPMap of the device and address was still ping successfully at least, so I set myself follows her and hope that it works:

  

• A standalone running Aeronet 1300 can support public and private connection?

  I have a client who asks if their autonomous Aeronet 1300 can support a guest network which limits the users access to the internal LAN and a SSID private access to the Internet and the internal network.

  I have looked through a lot of material on the Internet but found no direct response.  They have a very limited budget and seek how cost-effective this problem.

  Thank you

  AP is a feature of L2, so having an access point itself you can not achieve. You must have a L3 device where you can set two IVR (for comments & internal users) & restrict traffic where they can go. This device can also be NAT so that is connected to the internet.

  Then you can simply move these two VLANS to the AP & map it to two different SSID on the AP.

  HTH

  Rasika

  Pls note all useful responses *.