Quality encoding WMV

Similar Questions

• Export from Adobe Premiere CS4 - out of low quality/pixelated WMV

  Export WMV (Windows Media Video) from Adobe Premiere CS4 (via Adobe Media Encoder CS4) gives a very low quality/pixelated output (especially when there is text in the video). I use the following settings:

  
  Video Codec: Windows Media 9
  Pass encoding: 2
  Bitrate Mode: Variable unconstrained

  Width of the frame: 1024
  Frame height: 576

  (* Same as source)

  Format of the pixels: Square pixels (1.0)

  Decoder complexity: Auto
  Keyframe interval: 5
  Average of Bitrate of the video: 5000

  
  I used the EXACT same settings in Adobe Premiere CS3 and the quality is absolutely perfect. (See the comparison example attached)

  Any ideas what may be the problem?

  Thank you

  FAS

  Try gradual (no frame) in the settings of your sequence.

• Adobe Media Encoder - .wmv not export so much?

  I use Adobe Media Encoder CS6 on a Windows 7 computer.  I visited on a Windows Media (.wmv) format, but it is not found in one of the presets or from the format dropdown.  Only F4V, FLV, H.264, H.264 (inheritance) and MP3 are available.

  I can't find any information indicating that I need to install additional codecs, but I think that's the problem.

  Or maybe it's the version of Creative Suite that does not allow for some file formats?

  Anyone?

  Thank you.

  Hi thanser,

  Adobe Media Encoder has all codecs QuickTime, WMV and others if you have any video application like, Premiere Pro, After Effects or SpeedGrade installed because these are royalty bearing codecs and can be turned on if you have video applications installed and activated with the respective serial. If you have the license for Indesign, Illustrator or Photoshop you might not get these codecs. For example, video applications are provided with the suite Master Collection or Production Premium suite and if you have any what further action you can only use the video as a 30 day trial and get these codecs for a limited time.

  Kind regards

  Vinay

• Good quality encoding enough only to 50 + mbs

  I'm trying to make a mp4 of 75 MB/s at a reasonable rate, with a minimum of quality loss regardless of the encoding time.

  After doing some research on the web, I decided that if 30 Mbit/s is sufficient for 99% of the population, it will be enough for me. If it is not.

  Parameters: H.264, 1080 p, 29.97, return to maximum depth, VBR 2 pass (also tried CBR, and in some cases, better), use maximum render quality.

  

  Surely, I missed something, no? Much more loss of quality of 30 Mbit/s and 40 MB/s may not be normal. It's as if there is no grass, it's just... the blur. Oh and it does not matter if I put the target at 30 Mbit/s and the maximum to 100 Mbps, SOUL CS6 is too stupid to realize needs 60 Mbit/s in this framework, it still uses 30 Mbit / s.

  What are my options? Thanks in advance!

  Edit: screenshots of jeans are in the wrong order, on top is the 100 Mbps and bot 30.

  Edit2: Here's the original screenshots. It is more obvious if you open both and alt tab between them.

  http://i48.Tinypic.com/2q36jcy.PNG

  http://i50.Tinypic.com/w0j59d.PNG

  Hi Quertiy,

  Rendering to render quality max will not help much, or not at all. STROKE is 8 bits, so there is no point to the raw image to 32 bit, because it is then downgraded to 8 bit 4:2:0 for encoding. You go just 4 x slower to render.

  Regarding the grass and the jeans into blocks, it's a consequence of the choice bit that the grouped (hand based Concept) makes "H.264" encoder. The rate most such decisions are hidden, but down to 30Mbps and lower you will notice them.

  Have a look here http://www.x264pro.com/?page_id=6 for an example of how things like grass, jeans and shirts to get blocky.

  for example:

  

  What your tests show is that you need to put more bits in the static parts of the image. X 264 is what quality "Adaptive" means. In SOUL you can only do this with higher rates.

  Here is a comparison of Adobe Media Encoder x 264 vs. Note the water and cover the ground at the back of the image.

  Source language:

  

  Adobe Media Encoder:

  

  x 264 with Adaptive quality = 1.5

  

  These images come from: 1 http://forum.videohelp.com/threads/308482-high-quality-mpeg-2-encoding?p=1907070&viewfull= post1907070 #

  hope that helps,

  Edward

• How to convert MP4 files to use in MovieMaker

  I am trying to conver mp4 files that will be used for the filmmaker. I downloaded a free trial of iOrgSoft Video Converter. Because I wanted a better quality than .wmv I tried three conversions of .avi - Raw video, Divx and xvid. With the 3, I received the following message when you import into WMM: "Avi could not be imported. unspecified error ". I triend mp2 and although she brought to her, it was not as strong as the mp4. Any suggestions?

  WMV would be the best choice:

  There are to many converters available on the net...
  the following links are some examples.

  Proceed at your own risk *.

  (FWIW... it's always a good idea to create a system)
  Restore point before installing software or updates)

  (1) format Factory (freeware)
  http://www.videohelp.com/tools/Format_Factory
  (the 'direct link' is faster)
  (the file you want to download is: > FFSetup270.zip<>
  (FWIW... installation..., you can uncheck
  ('all' boxes on the last screen)
  (Windows XP / Vista / 7)

  First, you will need to decompress the file or just open the
  Drag FFSetup270.exe out of the folder
  and drop it on your desktop. To install left click.

  (2) Freemake Free Video Converter (freeware)
  http://www.Freemake.com/free_video_converter/
  (Windows XP / Vista / 7)

  (3) Koyotesoft Free Video Converter
  http://www.koyotesoft.com/indexEn.html
  (2000/XP/2003/Vista/Seven)

  (4) Sothink Free Video Converter
  http://www.Sothinkmedia.com/video-converter/
  (Windows XP / Vista / 7)

  (5) SUPER © Simplified Universal Player Encoder & Renderer
  http://www.videohelp.com/tools/Super
  (the download mirror site is faster) (Windows XP / Vista / 7)

  (6) Xilisoft Video Converter
  http://www.Xilisoft.com/video-converter.html
  (not freeware but receives good reviews)
  (Windows XP (SP2 or later) / Vista / 7)

• If it is not recommended to burn DL iDVD projects?

  Hello

  When I want to save/record an as project DL iDVD project, iDVD says, one should not burn to / save as disc image, if you want to use DL media.

  Here, he also says that most stand-alone players will not play DL media http://www.peachpit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1355450&seqNum=13

  So what is the situation? Any recommendations? Better avoid DL projects?

  Thanks in advance.

  This article from Peachpit is very old.

  I've never seen this comment from iDVD: at what stage do you see that? You can take a screenshot and post here?

  I rarely use DVD double layer as projects more than 2 hours are really too long.

  iDVD encoding settings:

  http://support.Apple.com/kb/HT1502?viewlocale=en_US

  Short version:

  Best Performance is for up to 60 minutes videos

  Is better quality for the videos up to 120 minutes

  Professional quality is also for up to 120 minutes, but a higher quality (and takes much longer)

  It was single layer DVD double those numbers for the double DVD layer.

  Professional: professional quality option uses the advanced technology of re-encoding to encode your video (the first pass determines what parts of the film may be compressor plu data without loss of quality and what are the parts cannot.)  The second pass then encodes the parts accordingly), resulting in the best possible video quality on your DVD burned. You can select this option regardless of the duration of your project (up to 2 hours of video for a single disc layer and 4 hours for a double-layer disc). Because the professional quality encoding is time-consuming (requiring twice as much time to encode a project like the high quality option, for example) choose it only if you are not concerned about the time needed.

  In both cases the maximum length includes titles, transitions and effects, etc. Allow about 15 minutes for them.

  You can use the amount of video in your project as a rough determination of which method to choose. If your project has an hour or less of video (for a single layer disc), choose the best Performance. If it is between 1 and 2 hours of video (for a single layer disc), choose the quality. If you want the best quality possible encoding for projects that are up to 2 hours (for a single layer disc), choose the professional quality. This option takes about twice as long as the high quality option, to select what if time is not a problem for you.

  Use the capacity meter in the project info window (choose Project > Project Info) to determine how many minutes of video your project contains.

  NOTE: With the creation of better performance, you can turn off background encoding by choosing advanced > "encode in background. The check is removed to show that it is no longer selected. Encoding turn off background can help performance if your system seems slow.

  And while that check these settings in iDVD preferences, make sure that the settings for NTSC/PAL and DV/DV widescreen are also what you want.

  http://support.Apple.com/kb/HT1502?viewlocale=en_US

• How can I load computer my videos corder cam

  I have Windows XP operating system. How to download videos from camcorder to the computer so that I can convert a dvd disc? I have also 1EEE1394 cable to go from JVC camera to the computer. Any ideas out there?

  Terry

  As said, you need an IEEE1394 port on your pc, connect the cam to the pc using the IEEE1394 firewire cable and use movie maker.  I would like to file dv.avi well, it is identical to the film on tape, of better quality than wmv.
  Editing the film, save the project and also to save the video file.
  You will then need to use a dvd authoring software to make the dvd. You already have on your pc, such as nero or roxio.

  Help with movie maker is here
  http://www.myvideoproblems.com/tutorials/MovieMaker/HowToCaptureDV-AVI.htm
  http://www.myvideoproblems.com/tutorials/MovieMaker/HowToSaveDV-AVI.htm

• . Treated AVI as Audio in Movie Maker and corrupt in Windows DVD Maker.

  I have a lot of. AVI files I want to burn to a DVD.  I do not have another series of. Notice to try with these programs to see if it's just them.

  Windows Movie Maker treats as Audio files, I tried to disable compatibility filters.  I tried this on two computers to Vista.

  Creating Windows DVD said me:

  0 files were added successfully.

  File (s) X could not be added.

  The files

  [Name of file]

  is not valid or is corrupted.

  I tried this on two computers to Vista.

  I tried to convert the files with "Any Video Converter", but there is a substantial loss of the quality of .wmv and mpeg conversion.

  I tried "of Aimersoft DVD Creator' trial, but video lags behind audio when I play the video in this program.  The videos show very well "Media Player Classic Home Cinema".

  How can I fix these files. AVI or convince Movie Maker and DVD Maker to care for them properly?

  Thank you j of volunteering.

  I used Freemake for one of the .avi files convert an .avi file. This increased the size of the file by more than 300% no change in quality.  Windows Live Movie Maker considers the new .avi properly, but not creating Windows DVD or Windows Movie Maker, they still refuse to import or use it as audio, respectively.

  I have converted the new .avi to .wmv with Freemake file and it seems that the quality is actually improved from the original. Windows DVD Maker will accept this new .wmv.

  I'll convert others, burn and return with the results for the benefit of anyone else who has this problem.

  Convert .avi .avi files then .wmv and burn with Windows DVD Maker have exceptional results.  As seen on TV quality is slightly better than the quality of the original .avi files on the computer.  Don't know what attribute this too, but I'm pretty happy.
  Sorry for the late reply, but it took time to convert, convert, burn and test.

  Thank you very much for the help.

• How can I get the best made for group presentations

  To 60i AVCHD Canon HFG 20 firing rate. Protruding on laptop to large groups and the need for the best video quality. I made all the ways that I can with bad quality. WMV seems to give best results, but nothing compared to the .mts files coming from the camera.

  Have you tried to share + publish a file AVCHD with H.264 CODEC?

  Do not know exactly which media players will play those to your projector, but the free VLC and MediaPlayer Classic HC player must also manage these files.

  Also, what are the features of the projector - any restrictions on the size of the image?

  Good luck

  Hunt

• FCP to Premiere

  Hello

  Although I have been using FCP professionally for more than seven years, I used initially first 4, 5 and 6 when I migrated from Beta SP band-to-band. The only thing that really bothers me on the first at that time was not necessarily that it crashed about 3 times a day, but when he crashed it corrupted my project file where I never had to make copies.

  Now I'm not saying FCP will never block, it very rarely does, but when he does he never, ever corrupted a file of project - I simply lost despite all of the work I've done since I last saved.

  So my question is, now that I have (in the next years, at least) to abandon the FCP, I am interested in the CS5.5 first on the Mac as a replacement and my initial experience of it is very good. I have not yet dared to cut a paid project on it however because I fear that it will eventually crash and damage my project file as in the good old days.

  Obviously, I can save copies every minute, but I was wondering if the first CS5.5 overcame this flaw (at least in my experience) of bribery when crashing?

  I accept it will sometimes crash, but I want to lose only the work since I last saved or recorded it automatically instead of the project file as a whole.

  Any comment is appreciated.

  I have a Mac Pro 2009 (Nehalem) 3.33 GHz Quad, 16 GB RAM, ATI5870, LG burner Blu - ray 10 x, a $ 50 eSATA card and one card RAID Areca 1880ix-12 hooked to a tower without TR8X digital 8 bays full of Western Digital RE4 2 TB drives. (I just added the RAID Tower recently.)

  I edited a feature film that was shot on the media MXF P2, images of 1080/24 p, 104 minutes length of the final film. For the most part, has been done on Adobe Production Premium CS3. The final product to single-layer BD - R burning.

  I edited four corporate videos paid for Dell, Inc. using the Prod. Premium CS5, shot on the Canon 5 d MkII, Canon 7 d, Nikon D7000, GoProHD and Canon XH - A1 sequences 1080 p all. Finished products burned to BD - R, DVD and export to YouTube and other formats like mpg, mov and mp4.

  I'm just starting another edition of paid feature film, shot on Canon 5 d MkII.

  So far, the only problems I had were of disk space, that is why the new RAID. (Now, I have 10 TB of usable on RAID3 space and a RAID0 internal volume scratch 3 TB using 3x1TB Hitachi/Apple readers, as well as several unique backup disks.) I had a problem trying to export the 104 minute of Blu - ray movie using H.264 first, but I eventually changed export MPEG - 2 Blu - ray and got both faster quality encode speed, and I thought it was because I tried to use too high a bitrate H.264 format.

  Other that that, I had no problem. I found that my 5870 card works better than the GTX 285 / CUDA card for me, because at least half of my work is in After Effects, and the CUDA is worse than the 5870 here. I do not use too many effects in the first of these days, so the GTX285 just sits in a box.

  I use first since 4.2, all variants of Pro, only to skip CS4. I was PC up to CS3, and I'm now Mac only on CS5. I had some crash issues with my PC using the CS and CS2, but I attribute that to the fact that I was on a single core Pentium 4 with only 2 GB (or was it 4?) of the RAM in 2007 or another. (It was also a maxed-out Dell, huh.) In all cases, the only breaks down on the Mac system were encodes failures during this test H - 264 Blu - ray. Never a crash of the OS and never an accident that caused me to lose any work. That says a lot for me. This system is my only source of income, and if she doesn't, I'd be in big trouble.

  I know a lot of people with the same rate of success of Adobe first/AE on PC as well, and they change you 1080 p and RED for live images. I have every confidence in the following Adobe video today, and I don't say this from personal experience. I also bought some FCP X to try this possibility, but so far, I don't like it at all. One of my friends uses exclusively, and the last, I heard she's ok with it, so I'll try to dig deeper when I have free time.

  This is my entry.

• design and rendering for output on a LCD HDTV 16:9 screen

  Hello

  I just finished an animation at 720 x 480 pixels.

  I made sure all my imported images were larger I need, just in case.

  I need it to be played on a 42 inch 1080 p screen.

  I just realized that 720 x 480 will be pixelated on this size.

  What are the parameters of output that I choose to make it look great on 42 inch plasma 1080 p

  If it is a stupid question, I'm sorry, then please point me to some tutorials. Everything I can find tutorials on how to whiz bang effects, it is not much easier for such things.

  If it's going to DVD NTSC, so it can be only 720 x 480 (4:3 or 16:9). There is no way to store a file video of resolution that is supposed to be compatible with standard DVD players.

  He won't be transposed in terms of pixels. It's just that, more the size of the screen in inches, the noticeble more pixels become if you use NTSC 720 x 480 (which, even once, you cannot help us if you will play it back from a DVD player). Yet, if you look at the tiles from commercial DVD, you'll see that (as I said before) if all other things are good quality, they look very good on a 42 "LCD or plasma TV.  There are other important factors, such as distance - video Standard definiton of visualization will look better on a 42 "screen further you are of her.

  You can make a Quicktime file or AVI without loss of After Effects, bring in Adobe Encore DVD and use one of the highest quality encoding presets inside again. There are dozens of other ways, but it's really simple and it should work fine.

• "" Cannot convert the DVD content to. WMV error file Format "need media encode.

  Original title: encode media need

  I have windows 7, I am trying to copy DVDs to WMV format. I get instructions to install media encoder. My computer will play wmv already if do not know why I get this message. Thank you.

  The f

  Hi Jeffst,

  1 are directly convert DVD files?
  2. are you trying to copy the content of the DVD first and try to convert the files?

  You can use a conversion tool to convert your files to another. WMV format. The link below is a program free Converter Windows Media Encoder 9. There are other programs of type converter out there, so if the Encoder 9 is not exactly what you are looking for, you have that option.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/forpros/encoder/default.mspx

  Reference:

  How to index a file video .wmv with Windows Media Encoder
  http://www.Microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/KnowledgeCenter/mediaadvice/0065.mspx#EAF

  Thank you, and in what concerns:
  I. Suuresh Kumar - Microsoft technical support.

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.
  

• Can media encoder convert a mov to WMV file?

  I use a macbook bro with the latest version of the Cloud downloaded media encoder. I want to convert a mov in mV file, but I can't seem to find out where I can do this, media encoder does not accept or make wmv files?

  Hello Courtney W.

  I use a macbook bro with the latest version of the Cloud downloaded media encoder. I want to convert a mov in mV file, but I can't seem to find out where I can do this, media encoder does not accept or make wmv files?

  Convert WMV on Mac? Not in native mode. You need a plug-in. Learn more about Flip4Mac: read the Windows media on your Mac & Flip4Mac from Telestream & #x7c #x7c overview

  Thank you

  Kevin

• Media Encoder: not possible to have 100% quality videos?

  I installed the trial version of media encoder. Trying to export a video in ProResHQ, I have seen that video quality is stuck at 90%. Is it because this is the trial version? Or is this the case in the wall in the full version (which would suck a lot)? It is difficult to see if Media Encoder is a good software, if we cannot try all its possibilities in a trial version (which is not the idea of a 'trial'?)... I won't buy an encoding software which does not allow me to have my videos to 100% quality... Especially since it's so large, because we have to pay every month and do not purchase a license once and for all.

  Hi florintxa,.

  What version of Adobe Media Encoder is installed on your machine? What are the specifications of your computer?

  I have seen that video quality is stuck at 90%. Is it because this is the trial version? Or is this the case in the wall in the full version (which would suck a lot)?

  No, it is not because you are on a free trial. Trial version is fully functional.

  Thank you!
  Regalo

• Export of Adobe Media Encoder CC 2015 H.264, very poor quality compared to VLC

  Hello

  I do a few screencast with VLC Media Player (www.videolan.org, free and open source), it picks up my office and exports the file to H.264 format at 25 fps. Can I change this in the body and also to export the video in the H.264 format.

  All right, but... The original video files of VLC has a good quality with a very low rate (200 Kbps), and when I try to export the edited with the same flow of SOUL video, the quality is just horrible! Artifacts, fuzzy, with a few blocks... Even if I export with a rate over 20 times higher than the original file (4400 Kbps), the quality is not as good as the original.

  Here is a comparison between the export of three:

  

  Can you explain to me why there is a big difference even if the flow is multiplied by 20? Here are the settings of export (with a rate of 400 Kbps):

  

  Thank you very much for your help and please excuse my bad English

  Any time you take a highly compressed encoded video and then re - encode at such a low rate, it will look bad. In this case, your examples are not surprising at all.

  I don't know how VLC it coded in the first place (color space limited?), but I know that for some that you'll never get a good video performance with such a low flow and a high resolution - especially since you're re-encoding video already highly compressed.

  As a suggestion, regardless of your final settings, 2-pass encoding will give you a slightly higher quality for your budget to flow. 1 pass encoding in my experience is generally better for situations where you are not worried about bitrate, or when you need to code something quickly.

  Good luck with your efforts!