Quality of the 'Searchable PDF '.

Similar Questions

• Convert a pdf file to searchable PDF

  I have a lot of pdf files that I use in my daily life of the company, not that I can use the search feature and some that I can't. Can someone tell me the best way to make it where I can change the searchable pdf file.

  You must have Acrobat, Yes. If you do it's very simple, just go to tools - text recognition and run it on the entire file.

• How can I correct a text 'hidden' in a searchable PDF file?

  This seems to be a simple question. However, the answers are always complex, do not give the desired result and often answering a different question altogether. I say all this just to warn people at the outset that the 'problem' is easier than how many people and PDF application developers, including Adobe, generally it include the proposed "solutions" are invariably a total... Well, botch a reasonable word if somewhat underestimated.

  Here's the real problem:

  I have "searchable" PDF files created by scanning documents and their implementation through an OCR process. I create "searchable" PDF files to archive, index and possibly allow search for scanned documents. A "searchable" PDF file meets these criteria better than any other commonly used, 'portable' archive format - although I'd be happy if someone could indicate an obvious alternative I can remember. I don't have a perfect OCR results. If I need a document to edit or maybe feed in a spreadsheet or a database, I expect to be able to reprocess the page images in a given "searchable" OCR PDF and convert the content Word, RTF, Excel or another file format as needed with more carefully to the results for the archived document itself. Therefore, the "searchable" PDF document is scanned page images making it up while the OCR generated 'text' is secondary, but still important. Therefore, each file must contain images of the scanned page in sufficient detail to be efficiently converted by OCR if possible and quite readable for people who consider the images to be able to establish a process of OCR can not understand. Once scanned, these pages are the 'document' and so 'immutable '. However, OCR is not perfect. For an archive of searchable documents, it doesn't have to be, but some mistakes are important because they can prevent the document to be found by a search. Therefore, there must be a way to view and, if necessary, change the text 'hidden' in a "searchable" PDF file without changing the view of a document or how it is printed. No redaction. Not visible "corrections." None of the PDF stuff publishers want to insert in a PDF file when you edit it. I don't want to modify the document without exporting to a format suitable for an editable document. I just want enough 'correct' text hidden in a PDF "searchable".

  I apologize for the length and redundancy in my description of the problem. However, past attempts to explain my problem and objectives as well as what I've seen in response to similar questions through the Internet indicate that most people trying to answer this question coming home the same point of view shared by most, if not all, sellers PDF tool or application. They seem to think that all desire to edit a PDF file is a desire to have a PDF processing any. Or, they assume that the process of OCR employee may need tweaking of the means by which people apply and then a process like 'find the suspects' is sufficient to deal with errors. But no, it's not what I'm trying to accomplish and the responses that deal with these subjects do not meet this issue.

  In short, what tool or the application of any provider will reveal "searchable" hidden text in a file PDF produced by any OCR or any other process and then enable corrections to the text hidden without changing the document display settings at all? Note, includes hidden text generally limit the information in the box which indicates the portion of the picture that the text has been recognized. This information must be lost or changed when you change the text "available".

  Thus the tools or applications that can do that? If Adobe Acrobat Pro XI can (use of a copy of the trial showed that hidden text content may be revised, but publishing has failed by any simple way I work while trying the application), fine. However, list $ 500.00 or even a $200.00 can update a copy of Adobe Acrobat X Standard that came with my scanner is a lot of money for personal use when reviewing and changing the hidden text in a PDF "searchable" OCR is the only function I need. Therefore, other instruments suggested or applications that make what I need for less would be greatly appreciated.

  I scan a document directly or starting with a PDF "only images", no Adobe product offers a convenient way to examine and correct the 'hidden' text generated by either the process Adobe Acrobat OCR OCR tools or third-party applications. When you use Adobe Acrobat, the 'Find the Suspects' function will allow correction of the flags of Acrobat OCR results, but a lot of mistakes-for example the names are a particular problem because incorrectly recognized the outcome of the names of "viewable" files that could not be found when looking for files containing the text elements that are among the most likely entered search terms - will not be reported as "suspect" and cannot be corrected in a file to be saved as a file PDF 'searchable' where 'searchable' is Image indexable () 'Exact)"- that is a PDF file containing images of scanned documents original, no altered page - with the"searchable"text written in the file as text 'hidden' 'under' the images on the page.

  For scanning and archiving paper documents with text 'hidden' to enable computerized research, products from other suppliers should be used. Adobe Acrobat products are insufficient to the task.

  If you want to scan documents, treat them with OCR, and then convert the results to other formats - for example Word, RTF, etc. - to be edited by hand, then Adobe products can be used. However, just at how they perform this task is outside my experience and is beyond the scope of my original question.

• When the combination of the quality of the images is less

  Often, I create PDF of screencaptures.

  In the case of a sequential series of screencaptures, I want to use combine them files to PDF (the context menu option).

  On the other hand, in the case of unique screenshots, or just a little, I use the create a PDF file from the Clipboard.

  It seems to me that the quality of the "binder1.pdf' resulting is slightly less than those created by using the Clipboard option.

  

  This can have effects on text recognition.

  Above are the two 200% zoom, hopefully, it shows the difference.

  Can this be avoided with some preference.

  Note: I have donot mind the size of the file, for me the best quality account.

  Thank you!

  =

  Oh, btw, under Workbook options file size is set to large. makes no difference.

  

  Don't forget to choose files of type: PNG more precisely.

• Image indexable vs searchable Image (exact) - quality of the OCR

  I work in the legal field and have always used the "Searchable Image (exact)" parameter when you run internal OCR on the document productions.  I am currently using Acrobat X when I do my own OCR.

  I have a seller who says they use Acrobat 9 "Searchable Image" for all productions of their document.  They say even if the actual image of the document is altered, they get better quality OCR results than they do with 'Searchable Image (exact).'  They say that the document is corrected that text can be read by the OCR engine.

  My problem is that a lot of documents is changed.  Architectural drawings in particular are dramatically tilting to the right, the edge of the drawing is being cut entirely from the document and dotted lines are added to the image itself - apparently where used to be at the edge of the page.  This is unacceptable.  They say that the entire drawing being reversed so that the first lines of the text on the drawing's horizontal.  So if there is a small piece of text that is tilted, the entire drawing is inclined to adapt to this one piece of text.

  Is it true that OCR is much better using "Searchable Image" vs "indexable Image (exact)"?  I need to select a configuration option for all the docs, and I am inclined not not change our documents in any way at the expense of the OCR.

  They also say that they have docs of OCRing evil I can't OCR without problem using Acrobat 8 and Acrobat X.  Does this make any sense?  I went directly from 8 x, so I'm not familiar with Acrobat 9.

  Once the OCR files use "Searchable Image" and SAVED, you need to go back and
  find copies of the original files pre - OCR and reOCR them by using "indexable Image (exact)"?

  If having this "faithful" to the original document is an indispensable attribute then, Yes, get you the pre - OCR had PDFs and run through the searchable Image (exact).

  Regardless of the version of Acrobat (4.x, 5.x, 6.x, 7.x, 8.x, 9.x, X or XI), the essential characteristic of the searchable Image (exact) has not changed.
  In other words, the image does not suffer the "tweaking" provided by indexable Image.

  Therefore, the PDFs by searchable Image (exact) of which version of Acrobat will be acceptable.

  What happens if you treat a PDF file containing a scanned image of text content through the searchable Image (exact)?
  The PDF wins a second 'hidden layer' of the production of the OCR. (I have it done - inquiring minds want to know, huh?) )
  Of course, using Acrobat Pro, we could eliminate an existing one 'hidden layer' OCR output.

  [addendum: this deletion is of * all * this - if a show it has disappeared, if more than one, then all go]

  The path "click on" ways to resolve this problem varies depending on the version of Acrobat.

  Because you work with PDF files have been the exact presentation of the original document is import, you can set up Acrobat that you have certain obstacles to an "oops".

  An example:

  In the Acrobat preferences, select the "Convert to PDF" category, and then select TIFF.
  Change the settings.
  Monochrome compression - CCIT G4
  Grayscale Compression - ZIP
  Colours - ZIP compression
  RGB policy: Preserve embedded profiles
  Political CMYK: Off
  Political gray: Off
  Other policies: preserve embedded profiles

  An example:

  Configure Acrobat Optimization Options
  --| via Acrobat optimize scanned PDF document
  --| through the Optimization Options dialog box presented after clicking the ' Options' button in the pane of optimization in the configuration dialog box to create a PDF from a Scanner.

  Uncheck the "Automatic" (you don't want "Aggressive" or "Adaptive")
  Select "Custom".

  For Compression
  --| Color/Grayscale--> ' select "Lossless."
  --| Monochrome--> select "CCIT Group 4.

  For filtering
  --| review the help of Acrobat to read the discussion on the choices that are available.
  (Deskew |) Background removal | Edge shadow removal | Clean | Descreening | Removal of Halo | Sharpening text)

  Open the help of Acrobat and go to "analyze a paper as a PDF document.
  A close reading of the information will be informative and useful.

  You want to avoid dealing with any image of the record of lossy compression (which compresses by destructive removal of pixels - so "corrupt" that "faithful").

  You want to avoid filtering which alters the image.

  Be well...

  Post edited by: CtDave

• DeskJet 1510 while a single printe: can the deskjet printer 1510 create a searchable pdf document using acrobat reader dc?

  When scanning documents using the HP 1510, I already had a drop down menu the possibility to save my document in pdf format 'searchable' that I use to run another program that combines my PDFs in a large document.  Then my computer crashed during installation windows 10 and I lost everything.  I returned to windows printer drivers 7 resettled the 1510 and all software on the HP site and installed acrobat reader dc as my adobe product.  Now when I scan everything I see is to scan in pdf format.  How can I return the option scan to searchable PDF?

  Hello

  You can check the 3rd aprty following software that analyzes the text of a PDF scanning serchable:

  https://www.naps2.com/

  For the recognision of handwritten text, you need to get a professional OCR software, such will probably cost... I'm not aware of any freeware OCR program which is capable of such a...

• The printer software e-all-in-one-HP Deskjet 3520 includes scan-to-searchable PDF function?

  The printer software e-all-in-one-HP Deskjet 3520 includes scan-to-searchable PDF function? I installed the full version of the software, and this isn't a scan option, only standard PDF. If it is not included with the not on this model is an alternative HP printer software that would work with this printer and if not, is there an all HP designed for home or small office printers still have this feature?

  Hello

  Please visit the following link:

  http://h30434.www3.HP.com/T5/scanning-faxing-and-copying/does-the-HP-OfficeJet-4620-e-all-in-one-printer-software/m-p/2821615

  Kind regards.

• The printer software e-all-in-one HP Officejet 4620 includes scan-to-searchable PDF function?

  The printer software e-all-in-one HP Officejet 4620 includes scan-to-searchable PDF function? If not, all printers HP still have this feature?

  Hello

  Please try the following alternative:

  http://www.PDFCore.com/p01_advancedpdfutilitiesfree/feature_09.html

  Kind regards.

• How can I set the option of working "press quality" to create a PDF file by using the right click?

  I need to process a large volume of PDF from Word files.

  Option of work required is high quality press.

  I tested the creation of PDFs in 2 ways:

  Open the file in Word and PDF/Print/File and select high quality default press + save as default printer

  Then I tested it by selecting several files to a directory and using the right click (convert to PDF)

  Results: PDF do not have the same properties and right click PDF files have a poorer quality unsuitable for printing paper.

  Do you know how to set the option of high quality for the click press right (Adobe does not use the same parameters depending on the operation)?

  Go to the preferences of Acrobat. Choose the convert to PDF pane and click Microsoft Office Word. Click on change settings and from there, you get a dialog box that allows you to set the Settings Adobe PDF for such operations in batches. Select the option of high quality print and then press OK twice and you should be good to go.

  -Dov

• Since the new downloaded drive, display a pdf file was DOWNGRADED.  The color contrast is terrible and the quality of the screen reminds me of the first BACK operation displays. Help!  I want the quality looks an old back!

  Since the new downloaded drive, display a pdf file was DOWNGRADED.  The color contrast is terrible and the quality of the screen reminds me of the first BACK operation displays. Help!  I want the quality looks an old back!

  To add to this miserable viewing experience, we cannot even e-mail Adobe to communicate this déclassé experience.  We are forced to complain to others.

  Who knows of another pdf viewer application which is better (for viewing - what are the tools when he drove you nuts just to see your documents in Adobe reader?)

  Well, finally found.  Go to the edition/preferences/display Page.  Under "Rendering: smooth text", choose "for computer/laptop LCD screens". "  Do not know why the default value is set to 'none', which gives you this mess / hard to read test.

• How do you prevent PDF presets to alter the quality of the image

  Experimenting different PDF presets, I noticed with grayscale images in Photoshop, save to PDF using different presets, change image quality, more precisely the contrast.

  So, it seems that saving an image in the 'bad' PDF preset could undo a lot of pre-press work. Is there a better way/format?

  To get an idea of brute: there is a decrease of 8.7% in the percentage of black between 10% and 50% of the values (the beach) on a corner of the stage between the original in Photoshop and PDF high quality, who showed the same values, and PDF/X-1, which has compressed the range of 4 (about a decline of 8.7%) percentage points.

  A visual assessment and idiosyncratic, four versions of the same image (Photoshop in grayscale, High Qualtiy PDF, PDF/X-1a and PDF/X-3), which included a step wedge and the color ramp, would rank the fidelity to the best original, high quality, at worst, PDF/X-1a.

  The same image to grayscale in Photoshop CS6 was distilled (file > print > Adobe PDF) to PDF using without changing settings predefined PDF in distiller Acrobat XI.

  The screenshot next composit (all four images images on the screen copy screen, rearrange them, and then reduce the image to a 120 dpi to 4.2 "wide (including the text) gives an idea of the differences, but much was lost, it's here.)

  

  Walton

  I can't pretend that it's simple. There was a lot of choices to accommodate the many different requirements of professional pre-press. Same people experienced can fight to get the color corresponding to the work because they know that it should.

  The key thing to remember is that in the color management, it is never a profile in question. There are always two (or four, or six...). One, the source profile, described the colors in your document. The other, the destination profile, describes a device. This device could be the screen that you discover on the printer you are printing on, or a device that is simulated.

  So, by looking at three PDF files on-screen.

  'High quality '. Source: mast 20%. Target: your screen. It's probably closer to the color displayed by Photoshop, which will do something similar.

  PDF / X 3. Source: mast 20%. Target: output mode, coated FOGRA27. Then you must convert more using two profiles to see on the screen.

  PDF/X-1 a. DeviceGray (no marking). This (by the rules of PDF / X, but not PDF in general) is the gray channel of the output mode, coated FOGRA27. So no converson up here, but it will be converted using two profiles to see on the screen.

  Why FOGRA27? Because you him to choose, or in default, in your settings to distill. This is not a good idea, unless you know that it is the correct output for your printing needs device. This information must come from your printer, and you can't do really good PDF / X files without it. If you choose at random, you can expect more and unpredictable color changes.

• problem with the quality of the photo when exporting pdf interactive

  Hi guys!

  I made a simple pdf with before/after samples with superimposed photo retouching, changing the mouseover.

  When I export it as a pdf interactive (on jpeg without loss of quality), the quality of the photo on the final pdf looks like a JPEG on 40% quality, really bad. Œuvres turnaround.

  When I export to PDF for printing high quality - the quality of the photo in the final PDF is impeccable but rollovers do not work... (I checked "Interactive elements: include the appearance") but still nothing...

  Pleeease help cause I can't find a way. I just need the renewal work and have pictures in the highest quality possible.

  Thank you

  Jelena

  Yes, but what of their effective ppi?  Just try it and see...

• Why a difference between the quality of the image in InDesign and PDF output

  Comparing the output pdf of CS5 of our book with the version ID. The images are MUCH clearer and the colors are best when display us a page inside ID side by side with the PDF. The pictures actually blurred in the PDF, even though we are out at 600 dpi. When export us to PDF in cs6, clarity is much better but the color is a little off. Is this normal?

  The X-1 a-exporter of CS5 looks a lot better than normal and production better than the output of the CS6. What would cause that?

  If you export a PDF CMYK with no profile and open in AcrobatPro, workspace CMYK Acrobat color management manages the preview. So here is the difference between two very different profiles coated Fogra and newsprint WINK:

  

  

  When you export PDF/X-1 has an output intent profile is included (usually your document CMYK profile) and is used in Acrobat to preview CMYK rather than current CMYK working space.

• Adobe Acrobat DC (how to make claire Searchable PDF)

  Hello,

  I want to ask

  How to make searchable PDF

  glance,

  I have (which is not searchable) PDF files is that the Images

  Then I merge PDF 1 and when I try to click on Edit PDF

  the Page do automatic Searchable PDF

  But when I check the quality of police I see that's bad and when I Zoom the police be more bad

  If I want to get the best way to make policies very clear and searchable PDF

  and also I want to be able to click on links included in the PDF file

  IAM using Adobe Acrobat DC demo up now 2015.007.20033

  Any help please

  As I'm really tired with this problem

  Your friends pending

  Concerning

  Within the option OCR Bernd mentions, you should have the choice of searchable PDF format or ClearScan. The research will not change the look, but puts a text behind the image layer, then you can search. Of course, a lot depends on the quality of OCR on the ability to make a reasonable search. The ClearScan actually replaces the text with the text to display, image once again that may have errors of conversion.

• HP Deskjet Ink Advantage 3545: 3545 HP how can I scan to searchable PDF?

  Las en AIO of HP Photosmart D110 printers are posible escanear documents a "buscables" PDF (searchable PDF) instalando el software ocr_web_pack. Como puedo hacer esto in una more HP Deskjet AIO 3545?

  Hello

  The HP Deskjet 3545 do not offer the features OCR searchable PDF is not a scan size available for the HP scanning software.

  Try 3rd party NAPS2 request, a freeware PDF application that also supports the scanning OCR (indexable PDF):

  http://www.naps2.com

  Kind regards

  Shlomi