Question of vlan SG200 (ESXi VSA config)

Similar Questions

• VLAN SG200-26-SPA303 does not

  Please forgive me and new small business switches, I am more familiar with IOS. We have recently purchsed a SG200-26 and have several SPA303 with 2 ports. The other component is a Sonicwall NSA3500.

  SG200-26 is an interface to the Sonicwall that interface has a primary school of 172.20.3.x and void interface is 172.20.5.x. I have PST VLAN 5

  I went to "Create of VLAN" SG200-26 and VLAN 5 has also created and under VLAN voice ID is 5.

  Then I went to the SmartPort and assigned GE24 IP Phone + office. It was OK. But when I go to the SPA303 and enable VLANS and VLAN ID 5 get the network initialization. I am able to ping the 172.20.5.1 which is the gateway for the VLAN, but don't always shoot no IP address. I also have a beach DHCP the subinterface assinged.

  I also use the Configuration of Cisco's Assistant. I can see the switch SG200-26 and my IP defined, but it shows no IP address. So, I know that the CDP of telephone to the switch works. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Hi James, when you configure anything, you must choose one method or the other. How to read your information is configure you the vlan voice, but you also implement a macro on the port. These can have an effect of the cancellation.

  I do not recommend you remove any manual configuration, you have done on the phone port (s) and enable the vlan auto to take care of this voice.

  In addition, check it vlan automatic voice makes the phone port 1untagged, 5 tag, or whatever is the vlan database is.

  One thing I did notice in the text, this is how to set up the link between the switch and Sonicwall? You must manually configure the link between the switch and the Sonicwall. If your vlan by default is 1 and vlan 5 voice then the link between devices will be 1untagged, 5 the tag.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Question of VLAN by default and best practices

  Hi all

  I recently read on VMwares ESX Server 802. 1 q-paper Solutions of VLAN and came across the following article:

  Question of VLAN native (aka "VLAN1 Issues")

  "VLAN native is used to switch protocol management and control.  Native frames of VLAN is not VLAN ID tag in many types of switches, and in which case the trunk ports implicitly treat all frames not marked as frame VLAN native.

  VLAN 1 is the native VLAN ID by default for most Cisco switches.  However, in many enterprise networks, the VLAN is the VLAN 1 or 100, it could be any number depending on your configuration of switch type and running.

  It is common recommended to avoid using some VLAN native (often the VLAN 1) for any regular data traffic.  VMware recommends that you not associate any group native virutal server ESX VLAN VLAN ID switch port.  Also, so that you avoid them VLAN native for your groups of ports VLAN, no native VLAN related configuration is required on ESX Server systems. »

  That being said, I know a lot of people and more small to medium-sized networks leave light network VLAN by default.  If this is the case it would be better to change the entire network switching to one VLAN different and then put groups of ports on the same VLAN?  Or is the problem with the default VLAN really does not impact?

  Hello

  You have quite a few involved networks when you use virtualization and some I would classify as a virtualization host networks: the Service Console, VMotion, storage over IP.  They are more likely on separate networks of your VM network traffic... At least use VLAN to do this.

  See http://kensvirtualreality.wordpress.org for a good series of articles on virtual networks.

  Best regards
  Edward L. Haletky
  VMware communities user moderator, VMware vExpert 2009, Analyst of DABCC
  ====
  Now available on Rough Cuts: ' VMware vSphere (TM) and Virtual Infrastructure Security: ESX security and virtual environment '
  Also available "VMWare ESX Server in the enterprise"
  SearchVMware Pro| Blue gears. Top virtualization security links| Security Round Table Podcast virtualization

• Trunking VLANS on ESXi 5

  I play with a test environment and want to configure servers on several different VLAN. The problem is that I have only 2 network ports on my test server. It is plugged into a Cisco 3500 switch. Can I enable trunking and it will allow me to install servers on different VLAN? I'm a bit confused on the Setup on the ESXi. I have install a vswitch and keep the VLAN ID 0 or all?

  I know how to set up the side the equation with dot1q trunking Cisco, but if I setup 2 adapters, I set them as a port channel group or let them trunking separately? Can you do both to increase flow? If I do that, should I change anything on the side of ESX?

  Sorry for the stupid questions, just want to do things the first time.

  Hi, welcome in the community.

  All you need to do is to set up several groups of virtual computer on your vSwitch ports to meet all tags VLAN that you plan to use.

  See my walkthrough with screenshots on this thread;

  http://communities.VMware.com/message/2140869#2140869

  Once you have deployed your guest virtual computer, you will be able to select the network in the drop-down list. Simply right click and change the settings for the virtual machine, select network, dropdowd of network connection card (choose the label - name them properly)

  See you soon,.

  Jon

  Post edited by: jrmunday

• Question of vlan Cisco 7600 PFD

  Hello!

  Please help with a question.

  In our network, we have 7600 and I need to create a service of vpls with two different VLAN associated with a PFD:

  L2 PFD manual test
  VPN id 100
  neighbor 1.1.1.1 mpls encapsulation

  interface Vlan120
  no ip address
  Shutdown
  PFD xconnect tests
  !
  interface Vlan121
  no ip address

  And when I try to reach "xconnect PFD testing:

  Incompatible with the PFD configured setting.
  Check the interface MTU, VLAN ID size
  Or try to configure BPDU PW on routed SVI, which is not allowed

  Is it possible to do or not? No mapping VLANs etc.

  Thank you all!

  Hi Dimitri, you can do it, but the link is made to port vlan does not level level IVR.

  Here is a configuration snippet:

  the GigabitEthernet4/1/0 interface

  101 ethernet service instance

  encapsulation dot1q 101 second 10

  rewrite the penetration pop tag 2 symmetrical

  interface GigabitEthernet4/1/1

  ethernet 100 service instance

  encapsulation dot1q 100

  rewrite tag pop 1 symmetrical penetration

  connect GigabitEthernet4/1/0 eline-101 101 100 GigabitEthernet4/1/1

  Xander

• Questions of VLAN and configuration for Cisco AIR-CT2504-25-K9 Controller

  Hello

  It's my first time thanks to the Cisco wireless solutions, so I was hopping someone could help me with the following:

  We just bought the AIR-CT2504-25-K9 controller with some points of access for the AIR-CAP1702I-E-K9.

  The network is as follows:

  Peripheral layer 3 (managed by third parties): it's on the domain network. (VLAN by default, 1 - unidentified)

  ADSL router - it's the network without comment thread. (Default Vlan 4 - tagged).

  VOIP: VLAN 5.

  Both fittings go into a switch Cisco SG500 52 (Layer 2). There is a port to shared resources on the switch SG500 with VLAN 1 (Tagged) and VLAN 4 (with tag). The WLAN controller is plugged into this port trunking.

  The data and management network are in the same subnet and on the same VLAN (1).

  I used the wizard on the controller setup.

  There are three interfaces:

  management VLAN ID 1 IP 192.168.1.2 Port 1 (configured with a gateway domain network, DHCP, etc.).

  VLAN wireless identifier 4 IP 192.168.5.1 Port 1 comments (configured with modem router ADSL, DHCP, etc.).

  Virtual IP 192.0.2.1

  Proxy DHCP active overall.

  There are two wlan networks:

  (1) area - management Interface - SSID abc.

  (2) comments - comments Wireless Interface - SSID xyz (the wizard put to management, but I changed it to the wireless).

  Are the AP connected to another SG500 switch which is shared resources to the switch with the controller.

  Ports of the APs are connected to have only 1 VLAN unidentified. They don't have 4 VLAN Tag or not identified. However, everything seems to work as expected.

  When I join the guest network (SSID xyz), I get an IP address from the router ADSL and all Internet traffic goes through him. When I connect to the domain network (SSID abc), I get an IP address from the DHCP in Windows Server and all traffic goes through the device of layer 3 (I checked the public IP address in my browser). I can't ping anything from one network to the other.

  My questions are the following:

  (1) how the guest network traffic (VLAN 4) headed the APs controller when they are connected to the ports on VLAN1? Is it because the traffic is encapsulated?

  (2) is set up correctly? After you configure the controller, I saw a note in the forums, this State I can simply enter 0 for the management of VLANS to let it not identified. However, in my case, I kept it as 1, which is the same as the switches and then the tag VLAN on the switch. In addition, the set Wizard wlan of comments to use the management interface but I changed it to use the comments interface.

  (3) when I connect to the APs of the controller, I see several options that can be configured manually. Is it necessary for this? For example, there is an option of data encryption.

  Thank you

  A

  Hello

  (1) how the guest network traffic (VLAN 4) headed the APs controller when they are connected to the ports on VLAN1? Is it because the traffic is encapsulated?

  Yes, I'm with CAPWAP:

  More information: http://lets-start-to-learn.blogspot.de/2014/08/cisco-wireless-understand...

  (2) is set up correctly? After you configure the controller, I saw a note in the forums, this State I can simply enter 0 for the management of VLANS to let it not identified. However, in my case, I kept it as 1, which is the same as the switches and then the tag VLAN on the switch. In addition, the set Wizard wlan of comments to use the management interface but I changed it to use the comments interface.

  If you want that mgmt interface must be unmarked and then put 0 otherwise you can use vlan 1.

  I do not have what is configured under mgmt and comments interface, but according to the name I'll say yes, you must set the comments under comments wlan interface.

  (3) when I connect to the APs of the controller, I see several options that can be configured manually. Is it necessary for this? For example, there is an option of data encryption.

  Yes, there are many things that you can configure, but I'll leave most of the default of things unless you really need to change!

  The following best practices: http://www.borderlessccie.net/?p=270

  Concerning

  Remember messages useful rates

• Intercommunication VLAN SG200-50

  Hello

  Given the SG200-50 is not CLI, how do I create a VLAN but make sure that they are able to connect together?

  I have a Cisco router already connected to the switch. Is necessary for the VLAN to talk with each other? The switch can do on its own? Do I need another router to do?

  Thank you! :)

  Hi Dan, the SG200 switch is a layer 2 device. This means if you want only the VLANS to communicate with each other, a router or Layer 3 device would have to do that for you. By nature, VLAN don't talk them between them. A diverter that needs done for you.

• Private VLAN on ESXi 5.1

  We had ESXi for over a year; standard networking is very well.

  But for testing small virtual machines, I wish I could assign IPs private at will (192.168.x.x) and to communicate beyond the host.

  I created a VLAN with an ID on a standard switch but how do their itinerary outwardly by a IP address?

  It's the virtual routers with DHCP built-in VMware, and if not, what people use?

  I used m0n0wall previously - enough lite and OK for Setup - http://m0n0.ch/wall/downloads.php.  You can import the image of VMware with VMware Converter and this is an installation guide - http://aldosoft.com/docs/m0n0wall-getting-started.html.

  For the virtual machine itself you will need to configure 3 virtual network cards.  When you start m0n0wall I'm sure vmnic0 would be the LAN / WAN interface vmnic1.

• Basic (I think) question about OpenFiler in ESXi environment

  I guess that it is a fundamental issue, and I'm sure that the answer is out there via search.  I searched, but only problem is that OpenFiler/FreeNAS/etc are new concepts for me, so I still don't understand the in and out.  So I apologize in advance if I'm repeating a previous question answered.

  As I was doing some research on this type of solution, I started trying to piece together why someone use OpenFiler in my situation.  I have ESXi 4.1 running on a Dell T110 with 2x1To installed disks (over a 250G drive where ESXi is installed), using the standard gamepad SATA in a configuration non-RAID.  It seems, if I understand correctly, there are people out there who have a similar environment that install OpenFiler as a virtual machine and dedicate all storage (in my case 2 TB) to OpenFiler and which attach to ESXi to be used for the virtual disks.

  If the above interpretation is correct, why would someone do this?  What are the benefits?  I can understand using a type NAS device as a storage not installed in the physical area that ESXi is running on.  But by adding OpenFiler as a virtual machine to control the set of local storage for ESXi, would not be an added extra charge vs. using the native storage to ESXi management system?

  Just curious.  Thanks in advance.

  If you have only an ESXi host, then there is no obvious advantage in this. If however, you have two hosts and each has a virtual with Openfiler or similar machine and they have implemented data replication, then you would benefit from having "IP storage". (The new VMware Virtual Storage Appliance uses this concept too, NFS).

• VLAN Trunking ESXi with blade HP c7000 and Juniper EX3200

  Hi, I'm quite new in VMWare field, because recently my company is going to launch a public cloud in Malaysia, his will combine several technologies, so I guess I have no choice but to go and study all materials and related software. My background is system and network, I understood the concept and success raising (EX3200) switch with port is lucky trunking with id vlan native 48, where my other vlan is 45-47. However later on, I will consider how I need to activate multiple markup in ESXi, I found this VST it one that I seek, I created VLANs inside the vSwitch. Then I change my machines in vlan respectively (label to change card). Then I change connect it outside (adapter for vMotion and multi-service, call Management Network default console) to vlan 48, however, when I change, my blade appear to be isolated from others. I remove id vlan, or put as 4095, then it works again, but the machine all connect them my VLAN (45-47) can not ping to the outside, please help me in this...

  Yes do not activate the switch with VLAN, vlan 48 which is native on the trunk port create a portgroup of vmware on the vswitch who has network you cards connected to the switch but leave the tag of vlan empty this will be then in the vlan default of the switch, and then create three more vmware exchanges one for each vlan and this time make sure you enter the id vlan.

  then provide that the routing has been implemented each vm will be able to talk to each other (if there are now firewalls to stop).

• Question about my off ESXi environment

  Hi all

  I have a question that should be easy to answer. We can to the bottom of our building for maintenance on a backup generator. This means that all servers must be stopped including our VMware environment. This is the first time I had to do this since we put in our VMware environment. My question is:

  After that I have put all my virtual machines do I place my ESXi hosts in Maintenance mode before turning off their or can I just turn off the host without this concern. We have active and any HA so I thought that if I them off without Maintenance mode then HA can see that in some type of error and start trying to migrate everything.

  Everything suggests that someone could provide would be greatly appreciated.

  I would say not only put your hosts in maintenance mode, but also disabling HA.  This will help eleviate all false positives.  When the power is restored, gourmands on the one host at a time, out of maintenance mode and then turn on the guests.

  I think that it will be fine to keep the active DRS, which will help balance the load as each host out of maintenance mode.

• Single ESXi NTP config

  There is a lot of discussion about it in other communities, but I need to make sure I'm set up correctly for my environment.

  I have no internal NTP servers, so I put the date and the correct time (my time zone) in the BIOS of my server. What about Setup NTP on ESXi I thought use pool.ntp.org. I've never used this before, but a lot of people here seem to use it.

  My time zone is UTC/GMT + 2 hours (Sweden) and in looking at pool.ntp.org servers:

  0.se.pool.ntp.org

  1.se.pool.ntp.org

  2.se.pool.ntp.org

  3.se.pool.ntp.org

  My simple question is should I enter all four in the NTP configuration, and I should also synchronize time from the BIOS of the server?

  With regard to my VMs, I guess that I would like to use VMware Tools synchronize to the ESXi host and automatic time updates disable Windows, correct?

  Thank you

  Not much you can do. ILO takes that is the hallmark of the system clock or an ILO agent running on the host operating system. In this case, ESXi uses offsets from GMT and resets the clock of the host at the time GMT. Might be worth pointing out to HP for CIM providers could communicate from zone information to the ILO?

• VLAN and ESXi 3.5 U3

  At home, I have a DL380 G4 with ESXi on it

  what I want to do is to create a trunk dot1Q to a cisco 2960

  I want to do 6 7 maybe Vswitches with a tag of vlan diferant

  IE (Vswitch 1 to vlan 1 and put only the management of the interface on this vswitch)

  then create VM I want is maybe on other VLANs (for example if I want to have a virtual machine directly on the internet, I would be able to use vlan 7 and not worry that someone could hack into the host or any other virtual machine)

  can do this and how?

  also I want to the team or etherchannel 2 network cards

  If you create switches 6, or 7, you would need 6 or 7 physical network adapters, because you can't share a physical nic between vSwitches. I suggest to create 1 vSwitch with multiple exchanges, you would be able to define a vlan to each portgroup. If you add two network cards in the vswitch containing exchanges you also redundancy!

  Duncan

  VMware communities user moderator

  -

• SGE2000 / questions SRW208G VLAN

  So we have a little SGE2000P and several SRW208G more, and it was decided to use a GSM7312 for basic L3 functionality (price was among the main issues to be considered, we have found nothing else suited our needs of features in this range). We have just received the GSM7312, seized of the whole of the network was flat

  We have several VLANs that need to communicate with some shared resources on a particular VIRTUAL local network. A VLAN mentioned individual will, among other things, the domain controller (make DNS/DHCP) and our RAS in a box that does also all web content filtering, RAS area is directly connected to our line of T-carrier.

  right now, everything is in 1 VLAN pointing to the RAS area as its front door. currently all EMS/SRW switches are also directed towards the RAS area as a gateway.

  So now we have L3 functionality in place and can affect the IPs to VLAN, am I right to say that all the SEMs and SRWs must point to as default gateway GSM, while GSM only points to the RAS area as its entrance door?

  What about pushing DHCP from the domain controller in 1 VLAN to all others? I see that both the EMS and GSM support DHCP relay - what do I have to use? Something doesn't seem right about this... for example. Let's say I have the ms in the VLAN 200 (192.168.2.0/24) and VLAN 300 (192.168.3.0/24) and 400 (192.168.4.0/24) customers. If the switch transmits a broadcast DHCP request to the domain controller, the domain controller is going to know what scope/pool to give the address of? The server would be blind to the fact that the request was relayed to all, and even less should it been relayed from a knot of VLAN 400.

  There are a few resolutions in my mind to this problem, but I don't know that I'm barking all the good trees.

  One thought would be to establish special reserves for DHCP leases by MAC address in DHCP server pools (assuming that the destination MAC is not changed when the switch relay... I would even consider that at all until I typed all this).

  Another idea would be to multihome server and place it in each VLAN unique just to serve DHCP addresses

  Another idea would be to buy an 802. 1 q capable NETWORK card for the server and the trunk all the VLAN to it.

  These two little seems to defeat some of the purpose of VLAN'ing because network that I placed once more at least 1 server in each area of dissemination of layer 2.

  Someone please tell me what single thing I'm on

  1. your box of RAS is already a router. This is your default gateway to the internet. The routes on the RAS area are to tell her at what router it traffic for what IP subnet. For example, the traffic of 10.10.71.0/255.255.255.0 must go the GSM. So:

  2. you must add 3 routes on the RAS server. And on the domain controller to route traffic directly to the correct gateway, you must add the same routes. Otherwise the DC would always send the traffic to the RAS hence it is send to the mobile PHONE, even if it was possible for the domain controller to send it directly to the GSM. A route tells a computer where to send a specific IP traffic. You need the transatlantic lines to suite of destinations on the AR and the domain controller:

  10.10.71.0/255.255.255.0
  10.10.30.0/255.255.255.0
  10.10.40.0/255.255.255.0

  The gateway to all these three subnets is GSM not the RAS. Let's not the 10.0.2.3 that you have suggested. The correct IP address is 10.0.1.230, which is the IP address of the GSM (the next router on the path to these destinations). These roads should be persisted. You can add at the command prompt, or I think you can also add them to RRAS.

  3. you're merging doesn't have anything by doing this. The GSM and the RAS will be routers and therefore only to route traffic between subnets. In so doing, they provide connectivity. But it is not fusion. You would merge networks if you put in a bridge instead of a router or switch.

  4. the Handset will always carry the traffic according to its routing table. By default, the routing table contains all subnets to which it is directly connected. The routing of the GSM table has entries of routing for all four IP subnets to which it is connected: 10.0.0.0/255.255.0.0, 10.10.71.0/24, 10.10.30.0/24 and 10.10.40.0/24. If the mobile PHONE receives a packet for any of these IP subnets it will forward it to the destination in the VLAN respective. If the IP address is not in these four subnets it passes the packet to the gateway by default unless you define a static route. For your configuration, you don't have to add the routes to the mobile PHONE. He already knows what he has to know.

  5. the change of IP address you want is not possible: you cannot configure a VLAN 10.10.0.0/255.255.0.0. It is not possible. The 10.10.0.0/16 VLAN consists of all the IPS 10.10. *. *. If you have a VIRTUAL LAN that you cannot have another VLAN with IP address 10.10.30.0/24. Any IP subnet that is connected to a router must be different. If the mobile PHONE has two VLAN connected 10.10.0.0/16 and 10.10.30.0/24 he wouldn't know where to send the traffic to 10.10.30. * because this IP address is routable two different VLANs. You can only move servers to a subnet as 10.10.1.0/24 or similar. It would be unique in your configuration.

  6. There is no "L3 VLAN. A VLAN is always a VLAN. It's always layer 2. You can consider each VLAN as a completely separate physical unmanaged ethernet LAN switching. VLAN is simply a technique to have several LAN separated on a single device (p. ex. 1 managed switch with 4 VLANS instead of 4 switches unmanaged separated). An L3 switch is just another word for a VIRTUAL local network router. It's a L2 switch with a built-in router. There's still that L2 VLAN. But it can also route between different IP subnets in the connected VLANs.

• Nexus 5600 HSRP design question for VLAN stretched between 2 areas of vPc.

  To our new data center network, I have 4 5672UP Nexus in two data centers. Between data centers is a redundant vPc with fiber 2x10Gb. I have configured two areas VPC, one for each data center. I read that HSRP within a VPC domain is active/inactive, but I wonder what would be the right way to configure the HSRP configuration for the VLAN tense because they are two areas different vPc?

  datacenter_example.PNG

  

  If you need isolation of FHRP between sites, this can be achieved by configuring the HSRP authentication in the same place so stop the HSRP Hellos between the treatment sites and allow each site to act in active / standby. Due to the HW on the 5600 Nexus architecture, control plane packets multicast are punted to the CPU, ignoring any PACL or MAC - ACL. So with a PACKAGE, you will not be able to filter the Hellos HSRP, ARP, BPDU, etc. that need to go to the CPU, because there is an ACL predefined to redirect traffic to control CPU and this ACL that overrides the ACL configured by the user. It is advisable to set up "no arp ip free hsrp duplicate" to repress unnecessary GARPs at each location in this design as well. Note 4-way HSRP is supported only on the latest versions of NX - OS, see also CSCuy89705.

  Another solution is to run FabricPath DCI with Anycast HSRP, which will allow all the 5600 to act as an active gateway by default, refer to page 22 of the FabricPath Cisco best practices.

  -Jeffords Tyler