VLAN Trunking ESXi with blade HP c7000 and Juniper EX3200

Similar Questions

• Start a Discussion on vSphere / VLAN Trunking in ESXi

  This is my first post to this community of VMware, so please bear with me if I'm missing something simple. I went to a discussion to ask this question under vSphere, but for some reason that I'm not able. I chose to follow the community of vSphere, but for some reason it is grey when I try to choose to start a discussion. Thoughts and guidance?

  The real question, I would like to ask on vSphere is how to configure trunking VLAN on a single host (no vCenter) using the vswitch standard. I find a lot of links like this one http://www.rustyhann.com/ESXi-06-Create-vLAN.pdf that describe the process of setting up a trunk on the switch port, then assign a VLAN ID to the ports on the ESXi host groups. When I change the switch to a trunk port, I lose conductivity to the host, so I can manage it is no longer. In addition, on the host, I see no VLAN ID and I don't see any configuration which leads me to believe that the switch is inform the host (thru VLAN Trunking Protocol or any other means) which have the VLAN. I might be able to answer this question for my part, I can bypass the first issue. Thoughts and guidance?

  Thank you. Best.

  Hello

  You are on the appropriate tab, just type 100 or 200 should you able to type value. Check out the screenshots below.

  

  

  

  

  

• Trunking VLANS on ESXi 5

  I play with a test environment and want to configure servers on several different VLAN. The problem is that I have only 2 network ports on my test server. It is plugged into a Cisco 3500 switch. Can I enable trunking and it will allow me to install servers on different VLAN? I'm a bit confused on the Setup on the ESXi. I have install a vswitch and keep the VLAN ID 0 or all?

  I know how to set up the side the equation with dot1q trunking Cisco, but if I setup 2 adapters, I set them as a port channel group or let them trunking separately? Can you do both to increase flow? If I do that, should I change anything on the side of ESX?

  Sorry for the stupid questions, just want to do things the first time.

  Hi, welcome in the community.

  All you need to do is to set up several groups of virtual computer on your vSwitch ports to meet all tags VLAN that you plan to use.

  See my walkthrough with screenshots on this thread;

  http://communities.VMware.com/message/2140869#2140869

  Once you have deployed your guest virtual computer, you will be able to select the network in the drop-down list. Simply right click and change the settings for the virtual machine, select network, dropdowd of network connection card (choose the label - name them properly)

  See you soon,.

  Jon

  Post edited by: jrmunday

• VLAN Trunking between 6248 and 2848

  Hello

  I have a Powerconnect 6248 switch connected to a 2848 and I try to get a VLAN on the 2848.

  VLAN working and properly receive DHCP addresses, traffic lanes and DNS runs on the 6248.

  The Protocol DHCP, DNS server is connected to port 1 on the 6248.

  When I create a Trunk port on 3 the 6248 Port, allow all VLANS through it, creating a trunk on port 1 of the 2848 on VLAN10 and try to plug in devices inside, they can see all other devices connected to the L3 switch.

  The two switches are running the latest firmware and the L3 on his own works as expected. I can't get any kind of circuits working at L2, tried with normal cable and crossover switch.

  Here is the config of the L3 6248. Switch 2848 L2 has a blank canvas with 10 VLANS created on ports 1,2,3,4 with port 1 as the trunk port installation.

  Any ideas pleeease? Anyone? It drives me crazy.

  ************************

  <sub>! Current configuration:
  ! Description of the system "Powerconnect 6248, 3.2.0.7, VxWorks 6.5.
  ! Version of the software system 3.2.0.7
  ! Passage mode is configured as disabled
  !
  Configure
  database of VLAN
  VLAN 10,20,30
  VLAN 10 1 routing
  VLAN 20 2 routing
  VLAN 30 3 routing
  
  output
  battery
  1 2 Member
  output
  the IP 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
  field of IP domain name
  name-server IP 192.168.1.10
  IP routing
  interface vlan 10
  Routing
  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
  output
  interface vlan 20
  Routing
  address 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0
  IP helper-address is 192.168.1.10
  output
  interface vlan 30
  Routing
  192.168.30.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
  IP helper-address is 192.168.1.10
  output
  level password user name 'administrator' encrypted 15 5f4dcc3b5aa765d61d8327deb882cf99
  l2relay DHCP
  DHCP l2relay vlan 10-90
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g1
  switchport mode general
  pvid switchport General 10
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 10,20,30
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g2
  switchport mode general
  pvid switchport General 10
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 10
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g3
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 10.20
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g4
  switchport mode general
  pvid switchport General 10
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 10
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g5
  switchport mode general
  pvid switchport General 10
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 10
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g6
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 20
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 20
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g7
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 20
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 20
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g8
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 20
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 20
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g9
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 30
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 30
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g10
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 30
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 30
  output</sub>

  After turning off spanning tree on the 2848, all works now.

  VLAN, trunking everything.

  Thanks for the help! :)

  I hope that if someone else can use what it took me ages to develop. I plugged on Netgear switches etc and they seem to work.

  The issue was going on between the dell 6248 and 2848, Spanning tree is enabled on the default 2848. If I was going to the Netgear via the 6248, then at the 2848 switches worked.

  My config on the l3 also works very well if someone would use :)

• ESXi 6.0 Networking with blades Gen8 HP problems

  Have a few 6.0 hosts on DL380 Gen8 blades. Just improved their work 5.5 - 5.5.2 installs. The two blades Gen8 map of the NETWORK, MAC and the status of the connection addresses. But whatever the config, impossible to get connectivity. DHCP not receive and consider the same if DHCP is required for installations of our PXE. Even tried ISO installs through the ILO. Tried the HP and regular of ESXi 6.0 versions installation. Also made the same way of upgrade on 2 blades DL380 Gen6 and not had any problems.

  Any suggestions?

  Hello

  have you tried upgrading the firmware of your host for the latest versions with HP SPP 2015.04.0 ISO and as you execute the upgrade with the help of the ISO official from the seller? Sometimes, when you have a bad NIC firnware/driver combo, the network stack will not work.

  Good luck!

• Tips on Setup with 2 blades of Sun and San

  Hi all

  Can you give me some advice with a new configuration: we lack a POC of VMware view, and we have 2 blades of Sun X 6250. The two are running ESX 3.5U3, but only one is connected to a San.

  The first blade runs vCenter and VMware View and virtual machines. The other (connected to the San) runs the virtual desktop (XP)

  This configuration is chosen only for budget reasons. We intend to connect to the second blade in the SAN, but it requires a switch of fiber optics and a HBA. But there is no budget for the time ;-(

  Each blade has 2 NETWORK interface card and the two are connected. We have created a vSwitch; service console, the computer network, virtual and vmkernel. The two NIC is added to this vSwitch as active to spread the load.

  Is it still a requirement for VMotion have a private NETWORK map, or can it be shared?

  I thought it was possible to make a VMotion, while a virtual machine is running without shared storage? It is also possible with the vCenter running under VM? It would be nice for the correction.

  Any other tips or advice?

  Thanks in advance. We appreciate it.

  Wouter

  Hello

  But there is no budget for the time ;-(

  We all know that this situation :-D

  Each blade has 2 NETWORK interface card and the two are connected. We have created a vSwitch; service console, the computer network, virtual and vmkernel. > Is it still a requirement for VMotion have a private NETWORK card or can it be shared?

  It may be shared, but the speed should be 1 GB

  I thought it was possible to make a VMotion, while a virtual machine is running without shared storage?

  vMotion requires shared storage

  It is also possible with the vCenter running under VM? It would be nice for the correction.

  Yes vCenter can function as a virtual machine

  > Other tips or advice?

  • Add network cards if you can

  • You can change the order within the PortGroup when you access EPS

  PGs | COS | VMnet | vKernel + vMotion

  -

• VMotion traffic isolation, vlan trunking

  We have 2 full length M910 blade servers sitting in the dell blade enclosure. Installed esxi 5.0 on the two blades and joined them to the cluster.

  Each server blade full length a 8 network cards.  2 ports double aboard the card NETWORK and 2-port Ethernet mezzanine card.  All are connected to the internal cisco switch 3130 installed on the module e/s A1, A2, B1 and B2. all the internal switches are stacked together by the network team. and there is a link to internal switch (uplink) and an external switch (ports) that are on the vlan 137

  All the ports that are connected to the esxi host are configured as trunk on the switches of internal physical cisco blade by the network team. in our total case 16 ports (8 cards x 2 servers) are fixed to the internal trunk on cisco switch and there is internal cisco switch uplink and our external switch (located on vlan 137)

  On esxi5.0, we set up a big flat switch affecting all physical network cards to Vswitch 0.
  Please refer page for groups of ports configured.
  
  To isolate the vmotion traffic, we have configured tag (150) vlan different for vmotion. but vmotion does not work. Unable to ping of vmotion ips with each other.  But if I change brand VLAN to 137. vmkping works on the other and work of vmotion.

  If I change brand VLAN other than 137 to any group of ports (for example, management or virtual machine), I'm losing connection to the corresponding port group.

  
  I think that missing configure something on the blade switches internal cisco (3130). Please advise on what needs to be configured. I know that kind of why trunking is required. If you could explain the exact purpose of why the necessary circuits for esx would be great.

  What is advised to configure a virtual switch, such as a large flat switch or multiple switches
  Assigning to each switch port group. recommended configuration to enable balancing the increased load of incoming and outgoing and fail over.  detailed explanation would be really useful for non admins networks

  I will try to describe one of the possible configurations.

  First some facts/support:

  • 2 ESXi hosts
  • 4 blade switches
  • 1 external switch
  • 8 NICs in each server Blade (2 NICs for each of the switches)
  • vmnic0 and vmnic4 are connected to two different switches
  • different subnets / VLAN for vMotion (100), management (101) and VM networks (102,...)
  • all VLANS represent them different IP subnets

  Virtual network configuration:

  • 2 vSwitches: 1 for management, 1 for VM networks and vMotion
  • vSwitch0 for management and vMotion (vmnic0 + vmnic4)
    --> Management ports (VLAN 101) Group: vmnic0 (active), vmnic4 (at rest)
    -> vMotion Port Group: (VLAN 100): vmnic4 (active), vmnic0 (at rest)
  • vSwitch1: VM networks (vmnic1.. 3 + vmnic5...) 7)
    -> VM 1 (VLAN 101) port group
    -> Port VM 2 (VLAN 102) group
    -> ...

  Blade switches:

  • all the VLANS configured in the virtual network are present
  • all ports of downlink to the ESXi hosts are configured to trunk mode, all the VLANS allowed
  • at least 2 uplinks and the external switch configured as a trunk, EtherChannel (LACP)
  • ports of rising and descending liaison (on each of the switches) are a group of track link state

  External switch:

  • all the VLANS configured in the virtual network are present
  • four channels of Port/EtherChannels (LACP), one to each switch blade

  You can configure the VLANS on switches separately or by VTP. In any case, all the VLANS should be present on the switches of. If you need to route traffic between some VLANs, you must either set up a router on your network, or - in the case where the switches support and are properly authorized - configure routing ip (Inter VLAN routing).

  André

• VLAN in environment ESXi5 Switch Cisco SG300 and gateway RV220W

  Hi, I'm having a few problems getting VLANing to work properly.  I was hoping that someone would be able to point me in the right direction.  I spend a RV220W which has 2 VLANS on VLAN1 with a 192.168.1.x and VLAN 104 subnet with a subnet of 192.168.104.x.  Port 4 of the goes to port the SG300 Switch 20.  Port 20 switch SG300 has VLAN 1 as non-marked and labeled as VLAN104.  It also has the port configured in the same way 15 and 16.

  In my ESXi host NIC2 is in the 16 port and NIC3 is in port 15.  I created a Standard vSwitch1 and created two groups of ports.  192.168.104.x group has a vlan id of the 104 and group vmware with no id vlan.  I guess that when I put a virtual machine in vmware port group I would get the IP 192.168.1.x what I do.

  When I put a virtual machine in port 192.168.104.x I guess I should get an IP of 192.168.104.x, but I have not, I get a return address of loop group.

  Any ideas what I am doing wrong?  I'm assuming that by creating the port group 192.168.104.x with id VLAN 104 that is the vlan native untagged for this option, which would then send the traffic through the port 15 or 16 depending on the tag VLAN104.  That would be so only send traffic out port 20 to port 4 of the RV220W which should serve as a DHCP server for the this response as 192.168.104.1.

  Just at the moment where I think I have a handle on the VLAN, I'm wrong.

  Thank you

  I would recommend this:

  Configure an access port on SG300, with no trunking

  Configure it to VLAN 104

  Place your desktop on this VLAN

  Configure your desktop and virtual computer with a static IP address

  Test if they have connectivity

  This excludes the configuration of VMware and confirm that your trunk to the SG300 is operational.

• N3048 vlan trunk band guaranteed bandwidth

  Hello

  Ive got 2 batteries of n3048 which will be connected by a link of fiber shds 1 Gbps, there are several local networks virtual on each stack and some of them I want trunk on the binding fiber.

  an of vlan is for a balanced load diversely routed internet connection, there is a router on each site with 100 Mbps bandwidth, but also firewalls at each site that will be in the same vlan.

  I don't want no internet to run slow because something is hogging the bandwidth on the shds, so the question is how can I guarantee 100 Mbps of traffic for vlan 10 through the shds with us other traffic crossing of vlan?

  I have install other powerconnect switches and switches cisco with trunking VLANs between switches but I've ever done where I need to ensure a slice of bandwidth with QOS?

  I'd appreciate any help or advice to achieve this

  Thank you very much

  Hi Daniel,.

  Sorry for the late reply its been a bit choppy on other projects so just had time to test this out.

  Here's what I ended up using in the config:

  Console (config) # class - match-all card VLAN_10_MATCH
  Console (config-WCPA) # match vlan 10

  Console (config) # VLAN_10_MARK policy-map on
  class console(config-Policy-classmap) # VLAN_10_MATCH
  Console(config-Policy-classmap) # brand cos 5

  Console (config) # int item in gi1/0/48
  Console (Config-if-X/Y/Z) # classofservice trust dot1p
  Console (Config-if-X/Y/Z) # classofservice dot1p-mapping 5 3
  Console (Config-if-X/Y/Z) # cos - min - bandwidth tail 0 0 10 0 0 0 0
  Console (Config-if-X/Y/Z) # cos - queue strict
  Console (Config-if-X/Y/Z) # - political service on VLAN_10_MARK

  I applied the same configuration for the trunk on two piles of switch port
  

  Thanks for your help in pointing me in the right direction

  I used jperf on 2 laptops in VLAN 10, 1 in each switch then your laptop on the other switch into a vlan with jperf mode server and 3 computers, send traffic using jperf him around the trunk and which seems to work well. ive tried run qos traffic vlan first and then maxing the bandwidth through the traffic trunk vlan qos not and then vice versa with traffic vlan qos to a already maxxed bandwidth through the trunk and he still gave him its bandwidth of 100 Mbps in both scenarios.

   

  concerning
  

• 1252 config several VLAN trunking on ethernet not

  Hi all I am new to these forums, but have read some posts on configurations for an AP from 1252 to switch 2950.

  I have several VLANS andmultiple SSID configuration on my ap.  The switch knows the VLANS on the access point

  I think that in the config.

  When I put the 2950 in trunk mode on the port, the ap is conencted too, I can see no longer the access point. And none of my ssid / VLAN traffic through the stem net ether to the switch.  I think I have a problem with the config of the ap specifically either in the British Virgin Islands (do not understand this virtual port) or in bridge groups. (Never worked with foredeck groups.)

  The AP is in stand-alone mode.

  Here is my config on the side of the ap.

  interface Dot11Radio0

  no ip address

  no ip route cache

  !

  the cipher mode vlan 300 encryption tkip aes - ccm

  !

  broadcasting-key vlan 300 change 600 members-notice change in capacity

  !

  !

  SSID 101

  !

  SSID 300

  !

  countermeasure tkip duration of maintaining 120

  gain of antenna 0

  Base-1 speed, 0 2.0 5.5 11.0 6.0 12.0 9.0 18.0 24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0 m0. M1. M2. M3. M4. M5. M6. M7. M8. M9. M10. M11. M12. M13. M14. M15.

  root of station-role

  Bridge-Group 1

  Bridge-Group 1 block-unknown-source

  No source of bridge-Group 1-learning

  unicast bridge-Group 1-floods

  Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people

  !

  interface Dot11Radio0.100

  encapsulation dot1Q 100

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 100

  100 block-unknown-source bridge-group

  No source of bridge-group 100-learning

  No bridge group 100 unicast-flooding

  Bridge-group 100 covering people with reduced mobility

  !

  interface Dot11Radio0.300

  encapsulation dot1Q 300

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 255

  Bridge-group subscriber-loop-control 255

  Bridge-group 255 block-unknown-source

  No source of bridge-group 255-learning

  No bridge group 255 unicast-flooding

  Bridge-group 255 covering people with reduced mobility

  !

  interface Dot11Radio1

  no ip address

  no ip route cache

  !

  the cipher mode vlan 300 encryption tkip aes - ccm

  !

  broadcasting-key vlan 300 change 600 members-notice change in capacity

  !

  !

  SSID 101

  !

  SSID 300

  !

  countermeasure tkip duration of maintaining 120

  gain of antenna 0

  DFS block 3 Strip

  Speed - Basic6.0 9.0 12.0 18.0 36.0 24.0 48.0 54.0 m0. M1. M2. M3. M4. M5. M6. M7. M8. M9. M10. M11. M12. M13. M14. M15.

  channel SFR

  root of station-role

  !

  interface Dot11Radio1.100

  encapsulation dot1Q 100

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 100

  100 block-unknown-source bridge-group

  No source of bridge-group 100-learning

  No bridge group 100 unicast-flooding

  !

  interface Dot11Radio1.300

  encapsulation dot1Q 300

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 255

  Bridge-group subscriber-loop-control 255

  Bridge-group 255 block-unknown-source

  No source of bridge-group 255-learning

  No bridge group 255 unicast-flooding

  Bridge-group 255 covering people with reduced mobility

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0

  no ip address

  no ip route cache

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0.51

  51 native encapsulation dot1Q

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-Group 1

  No source of bridge-Group 1-learning

  Bridge-Group 1 covering-disabled people

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0.100

  encapsulation dot1Q 100

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 100

  No source of bridge-group 100-learning

  Bridge-group 100 covering people with reduced mobility

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0.300

  encapsulation dot1Q 300

  no ip route cache

  Bridge-group 255

  No source of bridge-group 255-learning

  Bridge-group 255 covering people with reduced mobility

  !

  interface BVI1

  IP 10.131.10.70 255.255.255.0

  no ip route cache

  !

  51 of VLAN is what I'm trying to trunk more.  VLAN 100 is my networks vlan normal almost everything at the moment.  And my attempt to secure traffic wireless to a new vlan Vlan 300 more course on my local network.

  VLAN 51 has no ip address range

  IP VLAN 100 range is 10.131.10.0

  10.131.11.0 between 300 VLAN

  The routing goes to my switch 3750 core / router, but the access point is conencted to a 2950 namely shared resources to my layer distribution on a stack of 2975.  Once again the vlan 300 works on the 2975 stack and will pull dhcp if it is enabled.  Have not tried this on the 2950 yet, but I suspect it will also work based on the setting of the trunk on the s950 battery of 2975.

  In any case, I want to be able to do is have multiple VLANs configured on the AP (from most secure to least guarantee based on the capabilities of the equipment) and that traffic vlan tag go to my 3750 possibly for other guidelines.

  Here, any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you for taking the time to read this.

  Sincerely,

  Kevin Pulford

  Systems administrator

  Harmon city, Inc.

  Yes, remove the vlan 51 can tell vlan 100 is the native, and there will be a link to bridge - Group 1.  Then change the switch port to vlan 100 native.  You should then be able to reach the access point via telnet/GUI.

  orders will be:

  config t

  No int dot11radio0.51

  No int dot11radio1.51

  No int g0.51

  int dot11radio0.100

  100 native encapsulation dot1q

  int dot11radio1.100

  100 native encapsulation dot1q

  int g0.100

  encapsulation dot1q 100 natively.

  To be sure, save reboot and wr mem.

• Cisco SLM224G VLAN Trunk Help! -&gt; Problem solved!

  Hi, I have a few difficulties of implementation of the switch, I can't understand how to configure the network for VLANs created port. I have configured under management of VLANS, VLAN 10 and 20, I asigned ports e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6 with 10 PVID and e7, e8, e9, e10, e11, e12 with 20 PVID and the rest to defaul 1 PVID, frame SD = All + infiltration on filtering. Under port to VLAN-> VLAN10-> ports e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6 Tagged + e24 tag (I want this to be the trunk) and the tag VLAN20-> e7, e8, e9, e10, e11, e12 Tagged + e24. Theats all that I set up according to the SLM_Admin_Guide.pdf and I have connected the e24 (trunk port) to a Pf meaning Server (the server is configured with the same VLAN ID as on the switch), please someone tell me how to set up the trunk? I know that there is no option in the Port settings to define 'Access' or 'Trunk'... until this means? that the SLM224G does not support the VLAN Trunk? I saw some screenshots with the Linksys SLM224G and he had 'Access' or 'Trunk' setting... and Cisco does NOT work.  Help!

  Hello

  Interesting, I see two different GUIs in your screen capture, it looks like two different computers. :-)

  But the big brother of the SLM, the series SRW and I am about what follows to the SRW series, because I do not have a SLM in front of me, I had put;

  Step 1. the port settings interface return, leaving the PVID to 1 then do scroll down and save the option.

  Step 2.  On this "ports setting photo GUI, you have, I would put the switch ports to shared resources in mode Trunk. If the port must not be tagged in the VLAN 1 only, then I leave the setting the port mode 'access '.

  (Access mode allows a port belong only to one VLAN no marked only).

  (shared mode allows the switch port belong to several VLANs marked, but still unmarked in one vlan only usually the vlan by default)

  Step 3.  So I goto the "Vlan to the port' tab, Tagged for ports beloning to vlan 10 then do scroll down and save the option."

  step 4   So I goto the "Vlan to the port' tab, Tagged for ports beloning to vlan 20 then do scroll down and save the option."

  By default vlan1 in most SRW series brother would then be not identified on all ports and vlan10 and vlan 20 could be labelled on the appropriate ports.

• 5.1 network throughput problems c7000 and vSphere

  Hello, I'm new to the forum and I want to say hello to everyone!

  Here is the main reason why I joined the forum:

  I have a weird problem with my HP C7000 enclosure and VMware vSphere 5.1

  I used a standard vSwitch to connect virtual machines and associate them with a vmnic for my traffic from public network segment. With this configuration, I found that when I tried the command SCP to copy some files from VM1 VM2 to, there where good productivity, just as planned, but when I tried to copy to VM1 VM2, it just drag at a ridiculous speed, like 16 Kbps up to it just hold. I could repeat the same behavior whenever I try. So I just tried using the vswitch distributed, and the behavior has changed. Now traffic of the CPS goes as it should be between virtual machines, but the problems of flow between a virtual machine and a physical host like this: when I copy from the physical host to virtual machine, flow is as it should be, but when I try to copy the VM on the physical host, yet once it stalls.

  Please can someone give me some clues?

  Here's another thing, I have a blade with vCenter in 2012 Windows installed it works as it should with external hosts.

  I used vSphere in other environments and never had something like this behaviour before.

  Thank you.

  Hello

  I found the problem, the switch was defective. Just changed to an e3800 HP switch and all together.

  Thank you!

• Connectivity HP C7000 and Nexus 5000

  We spend our ESX servers in a rack mount environment at C7000 enclosures with blades. Can someone talk about compatibility box blade HP and Nexus 5000? The little that I find seems to suggest that this match may not be 100% ready for primetime.

  I have a HP Virtual Connect modules or exactly what FCoE lokks like with HP blades. Does anyone have more information on this specific vegetables or aware of this configuration, used successfully?

  There is full compatibility between the HP 7000 and the Cisco Nexus 5000.

  What you need to make sure if it is that you are up-to-date with all HP firmware and drivers Nic ESX.

  Take a look on my blog that goes into this in detail:

  http://www.wooditwork.com/2010/08/09/Flex-10-ESX-pre-requisites/

  http://www.wooditwork.com/2011/02/17/Flex-10-ESX-design-with-simplicity-and-scalability-part-1/

  http://www.wooditwork.com/2011/02/17/Flex-10-ESX-design-with-simplicity-and-scalability-part-2/

  http://www.wooditwork.com/2011/02/18/scripting-Flex-10-ESX-design-with-PowerCLI/

  http://www.wooditwork.com/2010/10/19/HP-Virtual-connect-for-the-Cisco-network-administrator/

• NIC teaming + with leaves HP VirtualConnect and Cisco load balancing

  Hello

  I configure ESX infrastructure running on the blades HP (c7000 enclosure), VirtualConnect and Cisco 3750 switches for the uplink. My network configuration is based on the HP VirtualConnnect Cookbook, scenario 11.

  On the ESX Server, I configured a vSwitch with two NICs grouped. Each card can see a different network of VirtualConnect. Each VC network has active SmartLink.

  Each network of VirtualConnect is associated with two ports on a Bay of VC. These two ports are the uplinks in Cisco 3750 switches. Cisco switches are configured in a pile, and each port associated with the VC network is configured with LACP.

  Here are the facts:

  -Each network (Host A and host B) is properly configured for the LACP Protocol, in other words, the links are shown as active/active in the VC Manager.

  -Communication of ESX is good.

  -Failover and failback function OK.

  The problem: I can't get the load balancer to work. All virtual machines use a single bear. I tried different algorithms on the server ESX (source port ID, mac, IP hash hash) and the configuration of the equivalent from Cisco.

  I have attached a diagram of the physical network, but also the setting to ports.

  What Miss me? Thank you very much

  Pablo

  Because you want to create technically not a channel in an ESX perspective, you do want to use the hash of the IP.  If ESX attempts to send traffic through the two network cards, the cisco switch should drop this package as part of its loop avoidance algorithms.  You should be able to check that out in the switch port statistics.  You should not use the switch port ID.

  Not sure about the promiscuous mode.  Who do not have any account, as far as load balancing is concerned, unless the portgroup was not properly inherit the vSwitch properties?

  -KjB

  VMware vExpert

• Problem of BladeCenter ESX Server Vlan trunking

  VLAN for the ESX BladeCenter server problem

  ESX, Bladecenter, VLAN

  Hello

  The bladecenter was initially setup by a company and only allows me

  create a VM from Vlan 2. The problem is that I'm out of intellectual property that

  VLAN and I wanted the ability to use another address space for the

  VM I have already created a new vlan 20.

  This is the current configuration of the switch.  Everything I have added to these configurations to before was sw trunk allowed vlan add 20

  Switch CISCO 4500

  Interface Port - Channel 1

  switchport

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  !

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet5/39

  Description Port Trunk BLADECENTER-sw2-p17

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  channel-group mode 1 on

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet6/2

  Truck BLADECENTER-sw2-p17 Port Description

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  channel-group mode 1 on

  !

  Config - sw1 Bladecenter switch

  VLAN 2

  Server

  VLAN 3

  WAN

  VLAN 20

  Server2

  Interface Port - Channel 1

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  interface GigabitEthernet0/17

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  Cisco-switch macro description

  channel-group mode 1 on

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/18

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  Cisco-switch macro description

  channel-group mode 1 on

  Blade switchport where the host is contained

  interface GigabitEthernet0/9

  Description blade9

  switchport vlan trunk native 2

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 2.20

  switchport mode trunk.

  The host ESX IP is in Vlan 2

  End result is that I can't use any VLANS in this new range.  There is no Vlan ID or installation marking.

  Thanks in advance.

  Grand...

  Don't forget to assign points for correct or helpful answers