Reg: Diff between Right Join and Right Outer Join

Dear all,

Kindly help me to find the difference between the two queries below where the results are the same.

SELECT * FROM emp RIGHT JOIN dept WE emp.deptno = dept.deptno;


SELECT * FROM emp RIGHT OUTER JOIN dept WE emp.deptno = dept.deptno;

Thank you

Both are same

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • What is the diff between a 32 and 64 bit, Windows version.

    Original title: is win 7 has also a 32 and 64 bit...

    1. What is the diff between a 32 and 64 bit, Windows version.

    2.i have a computer laptop 64 bit. so I install win 7 32 bit...

    3 - is the application and games from 32-bit to 64-bit media...

    1. What is the diff between a 32 and 64 bit, Windows version.
    32-bit Windows uses 32-bit programs. 64-bit Windows uses 32 and 64-bit programs.

    2.i have a computer laptop 64 bit. so I install win 7 32 bit...
    Only if you opt for a multiboot configuration.

    3 - is the application and games from 32-bit to 64-bit media...
    Yes.

  • Diff between: system.trigger_record and: system.cursor_record

    Hi, forms 6i,

    y at - it a Diff between: system.trigger_record and: system.cursor_record?

    Unlike the SYSTEM. CURSOR_ITEM and SYSTEM. TRIGGER_ITEM, who do not always have the same value

    (Form help: "within a given trigger, the value of the SYSTEM.) CURSOR_ITEM changes when the navigation takes place. This differs from the SYSTEM. TRIGGER_ITEM, which remains the same from beginning to end of the trigger. »),

    seems to this SYSTEM. TRIGGER_RECORD and SYSTEM. CURSOR_RECORD always have the same value.

    Look at this example:

    -for example ONCE - NEW - ITEM - INSTANCE

    MESSAGE (: SYSTEM.) CURSOR_ITEM); TAKE A BREAK; -shows for example ITEM2

    MESSAGE (: SYSTEM.) TRIGGER_ITEM); TAKE A BREAK; -shows for example ITEM2

    MESSAGE (: SYSTEM.) TRIGGER_RECORD); TAKE A BREAK; -indicates for example 1

    MESSAGE (: SYSTEM.) CURSOR_RECORD); TAKE A BREAK; -indicates for example 1

    NEXT_RECORD;

    MESSAGE (: SYSTEM.) CURSOR_ITEM); TAKE A BREAK; -Watch ITEM1

    MESSAGE (: SYSTEM.) TRIGGER_ITEM); TAKE A BREAK; -Watch ITEM2

    MESSAGE (: SYSTEM.) TRIGGER_RECORD); TAKE A BREAK; -Watch 2

    MESSAGE (: SYSTEM.) CURSOR_RECORD); TAKE A BREAK; -Watch 2

    Kind regards

    Zlatko

  • diff between Certified Expert and implementation

    Hello

    I'm new as a result of Oracle E-business, and I intend to take one of the certification of the E-Business Suite R12 to change my technology. Basically, I'm a Java developer.
    Can you please tell me the diff between Certified Expert and implementation? If I go into Oracle Application development, which of them will be useful for me to start my carrier plan?


    Thank you
    OM

    It is recommended but not essential (you need in advance before taking this exam, but even if you do not you will get the certificate it).

    Thank you
    Hussein

  • diff between the view and the materialized view

    Hi all

    Whats different between the view and the materialized view?

    could someone help me pls this topic

    thnks in advance

    See nothing else that a set is a set of sql statements that join the single or multiple tables and shows the data... However views do not have the data themselves but point to the data.

    Whereas the materialized view is a concept used primarily in the Datawarehousing... these views contain the data itself. Reason being, it is more easy/quick access to the data. The main objective of Materialized view is to perform calculations and display data from multiple tables by using joins.
    check out the link for more information below.
    http://www.geekinterview.com/question_details/29332

    rajeysh
    http://oracleinstance.blogspot.com

  • compressed backup size differ between the band and hard drive

    It is out of curiosity.

    11.2.0.3 EE on OEL 5.6 DB (64 bit) + Compression Adv.

    TSM for MML

    The disc and sbt_tape are configured for compressed backupsets

    compression algorithm is set to 'HIGH '.

    If I backup to disk, it takes 1.5hrs and produces a backup 10 GB piece.

    If I backup to tape, it takes 5 hours and produced a 27 GB backup piece.

    I look at 'top', it seems that 1 core working 100% with the majority of which (> 90%) being "user" (that's to say not i/o-bound or wait)

    (part of the 10 GB backup tape backup takes < 2 min over a link to 1GigE)

    Has anyone else seen this type of difference in size when they perform a compressed disk vs. tape backup?

    Is this supposed to happen?

    Should I be worried?

    Thank you very much for any information.

    MK

    After several Reading the Famous Mwill integrate, it seems that "compression unused block" is shot in for the DISCS.

    RMAN backup concepts

    So, Yes.  An algorithm different is used between the DISCS and SBT_TAPE.

    MK

  • What is the difference between NOT IN and LEFT OUTER JOIN

    Hello

    I searched the difference between everywhere. But his powerlessness.
    Please tell me the differences.

    Thanks in advance
    KVB

    It's like comparing apples and oranges.

    NOT IN - exclude all lines matching the condition NOT IN (beware of NULL values).

    JOIN EXTERNAL - return of rows from the inner table even if there is no corresponding row in the outer table.

    SQL> -- NOT IN
    SQL> with x as
      2  (select 1 col1 from dual union all
      3   select 2 col1 from dual union all
      4   select 3 col1 from dual)
      5  ,    y as
      6  (select 1 col1 from dual)
      7  select *
      8  from   x
      9  where  col1 not in (1,2);
    
          COL1
    ----------
             3
    
    SQL> -- NOT IN (subquery)
    SQL>
    SQL> with x as
      2  (select 1 col1 from dual union all
      3   select 2 col1 from dual union all
      4   select 3 col1 from dual)
      5  ,    y as
      6  (select 1 col1 from dual)
      7  select *
      8  from   x
      9  where  col1 not in (select col1 from y);
    
          COL1
    ----------
             2
             3
    
    SQL> -- OUTER JOIN
    SQL> with x as
      2  (select 1 col1 from dual union all
      3   select 2 col1 from dual union all
      4   select 3 col1 from dual)
      5  ,    y as
      6  (select 1 col1 from dual)
      7  select *
      8  from   x
      9  left outer join
     10         y
     11  on x.col1 = y.col1;
    
          COL1       COL1
    ---------- ----------
             1          1
             3
             2
    
    SQL> -- Maybe it helps to contrast LOJ with just JOIN?
    SQL> with x as
      2  (select 1 col1 from dual union all
      3   select 2 col1 from dual union all
      4   select 3 col1 from dual)
      5  ,    y as
      6  (select 1 col1 from dual)
      7  select *
      8  from   x
      9  join   y
     10  on x.col1 = y.col1;
    
          COL1       COL1
    ---------- ----------
             1          1
    
    SQL> 
    
  • Privileges differ between SQL * more and stored procedure

    A user with the dba role can access dba_role_privs. But this is not possible in a stored procedure created by the same user.
    Normally, the example should work fine
    But with Oracle XE 11.02 - cost free database with some limitations - I get error 942

    I show a simple example in SQL * more:

    SQL > r
    1 * select distinct dba_role_privs recipient where the recipient as "SY %.

    DEALER
    ------------------------------
    SYSTEM
    SYS

    SQL > create or replace procedure x as
    2 start
    3 for rec in (select distinct dba_role_privs dealer where the beneficiary as 'SY %')
    4 loop
    5 zero;
    6 end of loop;
    7 end;
    8.

    Warnung: Prozedur wurde mit Kompilierungsfehlern standing.
    English translation: procedure created with compilation errors

    SQL > show error

    LINE/COL ERROR
    -------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
    3/14 PL/SQL: statement ignored
    3/43 PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
    SQL >

    How can I fix?

    Why do you think the example should work properly?

    Normally, regardless of the version, the privileges granted through roles (such as DBA) not available for stored procedures. Stored procedure of a DEFINER rights can only take advantage of the privileges granted directly to the owner of the procedure. Stored procedure of the invoker rights can enjoy privileges granted by a role, but that requires that the appellant has independent privileges to query the table in question (and, in this case, would require dynamic SQL usage).

    Generally, the simplest approach would be to grant the privilege to CHOOSE ANY DICTIONARY to the owner of the procedure.

    Justin

  • What is the Diff between extract data and analytics

    Hello

    I'm new to HFM.
    What is the difference between the extract data and extended Analytics?

    Thank you
    Fri

    Extract data will create a flat file of entity currency only on folders - to simplify, there basically entry level data with the exception of the entity dimension and account where higher level data can also be extracted.

    EA has the ability to turn a star schema or a flat file that contains the data to any level of any dimension.

  • Diff between switch logfile and archive current log

    Hello
    I see that the effect for the two statements are the same
    ALTER SYSTEM switch logfile;
    =
    ALTER SYSTEM archive log current;


    is that there is no difference between them?
    Thank you

    Hello..

    ALTER SYSTEM switch logfile;

    =
    ALTER SYSTEM log current ;> archives

    alter system switch logfile--> switches to the following log file, regardless of the mode that the database is in ARCHIVELOG or NOARCHIVELOG mode. If the archivelog mode change system swicth logfile will generate the Archives of the redolog which was changed.

    change the current archiving--> oracle here log system passes current related to records and archives as well as all other newspapers not archived. It can be fired only the database that is in ARCHIVELOG mode.

    [http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96519/backup.htm]

    HTH
    Anand

  • Diff between the Dimension and the staging of Dimension table?

    Hi all

    I would like to learn OBI Apps I'm Consultant OBIEE. While getting some travel queries. Please guide me on this path.

    Thank you

    Dimension ends with D and dimension staging table ends with the DS. Its very nomenclature everything used in the warehouse projects.

    Table _DS will connect directly to the source and will be the largest part of the detials.
    Table D will have the primary Key(Called as ROWWID which will be the foreign key in all the fact table which ot refres too) as well as the table _DS detials.

    Mark correct or useful if this can help,

    Kind regards
    Rayan Vieira

    Published by: Rayan Vieira on June 5, 2013 16:36

  • diff bet multi user and installation single user

    Hello

    What is the diff between single user and multi user installation, please let me know also the advantages and disadvantages.

    Concerning

    Hello

    I think that there should be no further questions, but only how to manage and maintain files of layer application/database using a single user, or more than one.

    Kind regards
    Hussein

  • Difference between Inner join and right outer join...

    Which is precisely the difference between an Inner join and right outer join...

    JOIN INTERNAL:-to return all rows from the two tables where there is a football game. That is to say. the table resulting from all the rows and columns will have values.

    AND

    RIGHT OUTER JOIN:-Returns all rows in the second table, even if there is no match in the first table.

  • left and right outer join

    Hi gurus,

    Left outer join:

    -------------------

    Select * from A LEFT OUTER JOIN B on A.col = B.col;

    by definition, a left outer join brings the rows that match the join condition and lines not corresponding to table A.

    My question here is "corresponding to B and no matching rows in A" is that nothing, but... SELECT * FROM A;

    can someone pls clarity...

    Thank you.

    Imagine that you had:

    TableA

    COLUMN1 COLUMN2

    'A'                1

    'B'                2

    'C'                3

    TABLEB

    COLUMN1 COLUMN2

    'A'                 'X1'

    'A'                 'X2'

    'B'                 'Y'

    'D'                 'Z'

    SELECT * FROM TABLEA;

    A 1

    B 2

    C 3

    Now, if you want to join (first column is either in table A or B, (deuxieme from tableA, third table B)

    SELECT * FROM TABLEA A JOIN TABLEB B ON (A.COLUMN1 = B.COLUMN1)

    A 1 X 1

    A 1 X 2

    B 2 Y

    SELECT * FROM TABLE LEFT B EXTERNAL ON (A.COLUMN1 = B.COLUMN1) JOIN TABLE

    A 1 X 1

    A 1 X 2

    B 2 Y

    C 3 {null}

    SELECT * FROM TABLE A TABLE RIGHT OUTER JOIN B (A.COLUMN1 = B.COLUMN1)

    A 1 X 1

    A 1 X 2

    B 2 Y

    D {null} Z

    SELECT * FROM TABLE A TABLE FULL OUTER JOIN B (A.COLUMN1 = B.COLUMN1)

    A 1 X 1

    A 1 X 2

    B 2 Y

    C 3 {null}

    D {null} Z

    HTH

  • Right outer join

    There are four tables:

    Family
    Parent
    Child
    Grandchild

    Ideally, they have all documents, such as

    F1 - P1 - C1 - G1
    F2 - P2 - C2 - G2
    F3 - P3 - C3 - G3

    But sometimes,.

    F1 - P1 - C1 - null
    F2 - P2 - null - null
    F3 - P3 - null - null

    For the case of the latter, maybe I need to right outer join. If it's between two tables, the right outer join is easier. But among the four tables, inner family join parent, child of the outer join, then the big kid outer join. Maybe even this has been done? If an outer join in this case is not relevant, what other options are available?


    Thank you

    (ORACLE 11.2)

    Hello

    As Salomon, said

    FROM  p  LEFT  OUTER JOIN c
    

    means exactly the same thing that

    FROM  c  RIGHT OUTER JOIN p
    

    Everything you do with LEFT OUTER JOIN you could also do with RIGHT OUTER JOIN, and vice versa. If either one did not exist, you may do whatever you want with the other. In practice, it's just what's happening: most of the people always use LEFT OUTER JOIN and never use a RIGHT OUTER JOIN.

    You can have a series of outer joins cascading. If I understand your problem, a particular family may or may not have parents that belongs to him. If there are relatives, then you want to show the family with his parents to realteaed, but if there are no parents, so you want to show the family anyway. Similarly, you want to show parents whether or not they have children, and the children or not all my grandchildren are related to them. In general, which is written like this:

    ...
    FROM           family          f
    LEFT OUTER JOIN      parent          p    ON  p.family_id  = f.family_id
    LEFT OUTER JOIN      child          c    ON  c.parent_id  = p.parent_id
    LEFT OUTER JOIN      grandchild  g       ON  g.child_id   = c.child_id
    

    You can have a situation where (for example) a child is related to a family, but the child has no parent? In this case, you can still use LEFT OUTER JOIN, but join conditions would be different.

Maybe you are looking for