Releases are delayed by MRP workbench

Similar Questions

• Scheduled automatic release arrested does not work WIP after zero at hand (i.e. level less than safety stock) in MRP Workbench

  Hello

  The closing of liberation from time to defined at the level of the item 1 day also level of safety stock is defined in card security of inventory of stocks.

  Once run MRP it should create the discrete work against point as to that point zero onhand but MRP workbench demonstrated planned order for item instead of creating employment of TEC article.

  Self-liberation planned orders is executed as normal.

  Need your help on this...!

  Hello

  What is the recommended ACTION for planned order... If the order is chosen by application for scheduled automatic discharge stopped... the Action will be ZERO.

  If the action is RELEASED, it means that the planned auto-sortie orders request has not processed the request.

  Possible causes can be...

  1. the dates are outside the timefence of liberation...

  2. There are Compression days on this command. ... My best bet is as follows.

  If you want the automatic discharge orders require to take orders with days of compression, you must define the profile of MSC: Auto-Release Compression days tolerance to a value x... where x is the number of days of compression in which automatic release will address the planned order.

  IF the Action planned order is NONE... which means automatic discharge planned orders ask treated the folder... You should check the load mass WIP OUTPUT file to see all errors (not the log file).

  Hope that helps.

  Kind regards

  Mohan Balaji

  NOTE: Please indicate the post as helpful or answered if the update has really helped you. This would also bring the wire to the logical conclusion and will be useful for viewers.

• Windows cannot create the network map. Responses of the other devices on the network are delayed or on the network, there is a router incapatible

  Original title: no network card
  I installed a NETGEAR N300 Wireless USB Adapter on my computer which is a desk top Dell 64-bit running Windows 7 Edition Home Premium. There are five computers on my network. Two of the others use the same model of NETGEAR wireless USB adapt. I removed the Ethernet cable after the installation of the wireless adapter. I can say that the new wireless adapter works fine. When I tried to map the network I got the same message that appears in some of these problems: "Windows cannot create the network map. Responses of the other devices on the network are delayed or there is a router on the network incapatible". I have restarted this computer in SafeMode as suggested in the above problems. I tried other things like disabling the wired connection has always existed for the cable. No effect. Then I tried mapping the network on the other computers. All failed with the same message. All the other four computers are 32-bit. Three of these computers are also running Windows 7 Home Premium. They are the best desktop computers. The other computer is a Windows 7 Starter netbook running. It is the 32-bit computer, always using a cable. That will be replaced with the same wireless adapter model NETGEAR. Anyone know how to fix this or is this a bug? It would be nice of the network software of Windows 7 has worked as it is supposed to. TO.

  I went the last wired wireless computer and the problem disappeared. The five computers can view the map now without any problems.

• Where can I find Firefox 7.0 to install? Is there a link maintained where all the firefox releases are available for users

  Hello team,

  Is there a link maintained where all the release of firefox and its patch are available for users to download & install

  You can get Firefox 7 here

  • http://releases.Mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/Firefox/releases/7.0.1/

  BUIT its recommended to use Firefox 8

• Mac Pro end of 2013 will not launch apps. most mouse clicks are delayed to the point of making it unusable.

  Hello community,

  I have a problem with my Mac Pro end 2013. I bought it in August of 2014. It has always seemed to be a little weird, but I attributed this to the usual first generation bugs and not-so-stellar OSXs from the end. When it was available, I installed the latest update of El Capitan, 10.11.5,, and it seemed that Apple had finally deceived. Since the update, I enjoyed the use of my MP as much as other Macs I've owned over the years (a Performa, G3, G4, G5, several iMac, MacBook, MacBook Pro and Mac Mini - 14 in all).

  Yes, computer on my MP was nearlly nirvana, that is, until a few days ago. It started when my mouse became very unresponsive and I just thought he needed a couple of new batteries. I put fresh packaging as engergizers in, but it did not help. The slider was slow and jerky, and sometimes it is completely frozen. I paired a new mouse, also with new batteries, the Member and experienced the same thing. Basically, the mouse was unusable. The slider control would come and go at random. I do not think that to restart faster, (which surprises me, because, in the past, I had to do quite often to operate properly). But I restart, and it seemed to clear up the problem at the moment. This strange mouse behavior happened at least a dozen times since the beginning, but generally, it did not last long and lightens without rebooting. I noticed that often happens during Time Machine backups are in progress, or when another CPU-intense activity is happening.

  Unfortunately, it seems that this problem of mouse was a harbinger of things to come. Today, I started the MP of his sleep and clicked on Mail. Nothing happened. It confused me and left me puzzled for a while. I clicked on my browser, Google Chrome, and even once, nothing happened. I thought I should go in my applications folder and try to launch Mail from there to see if that would work. All the time that I did, I got a message window that says: "Cannot open the application"Mail.app"because it may be damaged or incomplete." Immediately after you read this, another window message, just like this one open and said the same thing for Google Chrome - "Unable to open," etc. Icons for Mail and Google Chrome in the doc are now passed to the application icon generic Apple, (the white sheet with the 'A' in the lower corner). Each application I click on since waking from sleep today gives me the same result. Nothing opens the application icon in the dock or the original file in the applications folder. Another very strange thing, it's clicking on a file opens the file in the application it is native. Strange, Yes, but I was able to open Google Chrome, clicking on a saved URL, and I open TextEdit by clicking on a saved TextEdit document. But the application does not open by clicking on its icon. I thought it was very unusual.

  With this weird behavior also come a slowdown in response time of the mouse and keyboard. It is so slow that it makes the work on the machine, for all practical purposes, impossible. It takes 20 or 30 seconds to register a click. But, adding to the quirkiness of everything that happens, once an application is open, like TextEdit, the mouse and the app seem to work almost as if nothing was when working within the App on the other hand, the responses to the mouse by trying to use the finder or open a file from the desktop are very slow. A note on this: when I first the computer woke up today and ran into problems, I tried to open the applications folder and when it finally opened, there is no list of applications. In near-panic mode, I immediately tried the folder my documents to see if my personal files were intact, but no they had also disappeared, or so it appeared. I discovered later, having left the files open on my desk for an hour or two, that files showed later upward. It was a great relief. But the icons on several applications from the applications folder had changed to the generic Apple icon, for some reason any. I rebooted into Recovery Mode, but he wasn't able to do anything there except performing first aid on the hard drive, which showed everything be ok. I didn't restore from a backup at this stage. I had another option to try everything first. Re-boot after that nothing changed.

  The option I mentioned was to try Disk Warrior on it. I ran the latest version and rebuilt on the hard drive, checked the material, and all that makes the software, I forgot. It took about 45 minutes to run. The result was that it showed some things which have been corrected, probably 8 or 10 items, any rang critics. I said a short prayer and restarted. Nothing has changed. Everything that I described before was exactly the same.

  Exasperated, I came here to see if it was what I could glean conversations that could help me. I have not found something really substantial to help me solve the problem, unfortunately. What I found was that I'm certainly not the only person who has experienced problems of 2013 end MP of catastrophic proportions. It is obvious that there is a serious problem with this Mac.

  For those who have had smooth sailing with them, be very happy. If I was. The question came out of the blue. Yesterday, I would have been there with you praise. I hope your luck tends and you never have to experience this level of frustration with a product. I mention this because some seem to dismiss the issue as flukey. But I must say, in all honesty, anyone denying the MP has a problem either whistling through the graveyard or they are so pro-Mac that they are not prepared to allow even a small flaw in the Apple armor. They are good people, but they are in denial. I know how easy it is to refuse to acknowledge the existence of even a slight stain on the first brand hand. I have fought wars of Mac - PC at the time where we didn't know what a Mac - but almost every designer in the country. We labeled Mac users quietly the balls also odd, unconventional and offbeat. But we knew we had the best product. We knew that when the rubber meets the road, in particular regarding graphics, we would spank a PC each time. The years 90, and even the first part of the century was a time when serious computer users aligned on one side of the road or the other, Mac or PC. A lot of animosity arose between the two camps, especially on the side of the Mac, because we were the underdogs, rather despised by the majority. We felt the need constantly to get our message to the number overwhelming dominate the PC users. It follows a sort of tacit animosity. And it became a proposal for a war similar to many Mac users, myself included. For people who lived in that time and have subsequently become more and more immersed in all things Mac, the war is raging on. This is the meaning behind my description of those who are "so pro-Mac". Again, it is easy to understand why this mentality still exists. It was not easy for us guys good back in the day. But it is now time for rational people watch mentality 'til-death-us-part and face the facts, which also means recognition of all prejudice deeply seated, illogical. This member is not good. There is a real possibility that it could be much worse than not well. Time will tell.

  On the side of those who are unwilling to admit there are problems, of course, the argument will be, given all the members sold, he's going to be a dud or two, it's just human nature to be less - than perfect. I accept that. For my money, however, after having lived what I have with my Congressman and to hear the facts given on this site by several owners of the MP - and the absurdity of the incredible problems they have known - that any rational thinker must know at least the idea that means that we deal with a lot more here than the occasional, inevitable dud.

  The bottom line is, my problems are not isolated. It is clear that Apple has a product that fails to a very rare rhythm of the brand. Once again, I have owned for a decade of Mac, all shapes and sizes, but I've never had anything that happens to one of them that comes close to this type of failure. How disappointing it is to me, who has worn the coat for Apple products for nearly 30 years.

  I doubt if there is something that everyone in the team of technical advisors here at the Community Board of Apple can do to help me with this problem. I'm not somehow devaluing at your service for Mac users. I certainly welcome any help you can offer. I know you have helped countless others to find solutions to the problems. But it's a little different for you now with this model of MP. Your best efforts seem to be a bit anemic on this topic. And it's not your fault. Apple isn't talking, then you are here on an island of yours, grasp at straws to try to help. I congratulate you on that, but nothing I've read has shed significant light on this which seems to be a mess of real, first Apple class - currently without a viable solution.

  Yet once again, I welcome any suggestions and thank you in advance to address even. I will definitely check here in the coming days to see if he has the answers.

  In my view, the prudent thing for me to do now is to make an appointment at my nearest store from Apple, an hour and a half and let them begin to set. I'm not too optimistic about a full success to resolve the issue during the first visit, based on the experiences of other contributors. And I rejoice in water and the lift back repeatedly to do things, as seems to be the rule rather than the exception. But in this regard, fortunately, I'm retired and now do occasional projects at low pressure. It's great to not have the MP to put food on the table like I did for many years using my trusty ol ' G5. I don't know what I would if I still ran my business full-time and depends on this MP. Small businesses rely on their equipment to work. The major failures, such as this MP seems to display with regularity can quickly put a small company out of business. This failure is not a walk in the park for me, but I really feel for those who invested heavily and who depend on every day, only to have this mucking things up, i.e., when it is not in the repair shop.

  Finally, I write my thoughts here to express my disappointment in commiseration with other owners of MP end 2013. These are users who were as delighted as I when Apple eventually replaced the G5 with this elegant, state-of-the-art piece of equipment. Like many others, I jumped directly into the train without reservation, and I paid their price without any reluctance. Plunking down to $4 k for it, adding on 27 "display Apple and then having to buy an external drive now makes me a feel a bit embarrassed, at best and, at worst, as an easy mark. The result is, I wasn't expecting this new MP to throw myself into a sort of computer euphoria, I expected just to work as it was announced. The only thing I added on and I thank God, I did it, was AppleCare. Before this saga is over, Apple will probably want that I had refused it.

  I have not read all what you posted but I think a clean installation, even to an external and test simply install would probably tell a different story. I think you did an installation "backup" probably from a backup of TC. I also think that Legacy Applications from a backup OS x and third-party would be not beneficial. Try it, see what improves.

• Visa series parallel read with arduinos, data are delayed

  Hello

  Currently I use two arduinos asynchronous data read from sensors of temperature and humidity. Each arduino send back 4 floats, separated by commas, with a stop of "\n" character In labview, data gets broken upward and then pushed to live plots. In addition, the data gets written to a file - arduino #1 and #2 Arduino have their data sent to different files. It is important to note that the arduinos have different rates by which they send data on the comms series. Ideally, we would like that the data of every arduino to enter and update locations independent real-time each other.

  I'm having a problem where data do not seem to be displayed in real time. I can touch a thermocouple and then ten seconds later, the temperature will change. This delay seems to grow over the short program, which is a problem since we use a direct result of the plots to determine when to start various processes of cooling.

  I wonder if due to different data rates the thrust arudiunos, if there is some kind of buffer somewhere that has a "backlog" of the fastest arrduino data and must wait for the slower arduino data until it does nothing. It is obviously a problem of data flow, but I'm pretty green with LabView and was looking for some advice or pointers. I want to mention that the arduinos send data quickly; they send every two seconds or more.

  Hello MrScientist,

  can you please try to use two separate while loops, one for each COM port, because if they're in the same loop, it can happen that they block each other.

  A second option is always read all the information on the COM port and made a ring buffer and filter information of these buffers.

• sounds on Pokerstars, games of Tiger and other websites are delayed by a few seconds, or non-existent

  the sounds are intermittent, worked fine with XP

  Hi Reginaldian,

  1. which version of the Windows operating system is installed on your computer?
  2. any recent change in software/hardware on your computer?
  3. what browser you use to play these games?
  4. the problem happens only with these online games or other games too?
  5. don't you update the latest audio drivers on your computer?

  This problem occurs on the particular site, I suggest you try to perform an optimization of Internet Explorer on your computer and check the issue.
   
  How to optimize Internet Explorer
  http://support.Microsoft.com/default.aspx/KB/936213
   
  Warning: him reset Internet Explorer settings feature might reset security settings or privacy settings that you have added to the list of Trusted Sites. Reset the Internet Explorer settings can also reset parental control settings. We recommend that you note these sites before you use the reset Internet Explorer settings

  Thank you, and in what concerns:
  I. Suuresh Kumar - Microsoft technical support.

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.
  

• Windows Media Player won't play mp3 or dvd. All sounds are delayed, but nothing wrong with the codecs or sound card, help?

  I have the beginning of a vast music library and an already huge dvd collection, that I enjoy out on the road; But recently, WMPlayer began to refuse to play my mp3 and dvd. In addition, all my system sounds are very late, and none of my games have all the sounds either.

  I did my regular (think I cannot think and aim to do by shooters of boredom) and tested and updated everything that would update, including trying to reinstall my codecs, and nothing works, nothing shows as bad, but that they will not play again. The only thing I have not tried for MP3, becomes a non-Microsoft player to wipe the ID3 headers, because how would have on my dvd, games and system sounds?

  Need help. Please, I beg you. Music is my only consolation that I drive 9 hours per day every day.

  Sincerely,
  A truck driver is bored...

  Download and install mp3Tag. If your mp3 tags are corrupt in some way, you can re-do using this tool.

  To help you, it can also tag batch (for things like album art, title of the album, artist, etc.)
  It won't affect any DVD, they are a different format.
  In addition, run your antivirus and download then run Malwarebytes Anti Malware.
  Cheers, jerry

• Why my alerts are delayed

  So, I'm a new user. I have things to put in place and am tracking system of officers and some applications. I created an alert to warn me when an application is not active. When I stop the application it takes about 10 minutes before HQ warns me. Is this normal or is there something I can do to make it work better. I put the metric to control every minute. So as soon as the application stops until he lets know me it shows nothing simply on the chart.
  
  Any help would be great!

  This bug was noted as: http://jira.hyperic.com/browse/HHQ-814

  It is targeted for the 3.0.3 release, which should be available next week.  Thanks for reporting this.

  Charles

• Error 1074396154 allocated to off-delay.

  I use a camera GigE to capture an image and then check for a hole using IMAQ find a circular edge.  Whenever the device receives a trigger of the while loop processes and the results are displayed.  If the release is delayed for more than 5 seconds, I get error 1074396154 (IMAQ Spoke - not big enough Image for the operation).

  The loop must wait for the next picture before the treatment, so I do not understand why the error is generated.  Any suggestion would be appreciated.

  Kind regards

  Doug

  Hi Doug,.

  Have you tried to increase your timeout on your camera? The default value is 5 seconds and you see this behavior in 5 seconds right that might be causing the problem. Increases the open timeout measures and Automation Explorer, select your camera, select the attributes of the Acquisition down and increase the time-out value to 10000 ms.

  Acquisition from GigE Vision cameras with Vision Acquisition software - part II (Figure 4)
  http://www.NI.com/white-paper/5750/en

  Tim O

• Attack and Release in Compression

  Good, rather than as one problem, another one of my academic discussions 'how it works '.

  On another forum, I debated the meaning of 'attack' and 'release' in compression.  My thesis is that the attack time is how long it takes to reach the set level of gain reduction once the signal passes through the threshod... level and liberation is the opposite: reduction, once again the time it takes to come back or not gain levels once to cross the threshold down.

  Another poster, who usually knows what he's talking about, the content as time attack and release are triggered, not levels reaching the threshold, but rather simply by the compressor, a level upward or downward change detection.

  As evidence, he has published a test of Soundforge: a tone that made the transition between - 12 and - 3 dB at intervals 300ms.  He then applied with the threshold set at-16 compression (so everything should be compressed) and, indeed, the waveform shows the effect of the attack and communicated to each transition even if the test set should be compressed.

  I tried the same thing at the hearing and, although things are not as noticeable as Sound forge, you can see the pumping on the waveform.

  I don't see that the attack and release can be quite skilled to respond to each change in level (especially on a real signal, not his test) so I have to assume that the cause is a bit more basic.

  Here is a picture of the original file that I made:

  

  And here is the same file compressed with an attack of 2ms and 5ms release and a threshold of - 15dB, i.e. less than what anyone in the clip.

  

  As you can see, you can see where the attack and release happens (I do not post a picture but, with attack and release to zero, you can not see any transition) so if someone can explain that you will cure my curiosity!

  Want to know how to work the compressors?

  Well, I wouldn't trust in Wikipedia - especially when he's wrong!

  We must look at the history of the compression, and how this was done by conventional electronic means before having any kind of idea of how it works really - and then we must keep in mind that even if software compression can move some of the apparent problems, it is not necessarily a good thing to do.

  The initial problems with compression were double, when it came to the electronic traditional compressors. First, they took the time to analyze the incoming signals; Second, they took even more time to respond to the changes. It is usually because the element doing the control signal (and there were several different methods) also had a finite response time. Usually the response of the control element has been physically forced, and ultimately limited the attack time - even if you can detect a more rapid change, you could not apply it more quickly - you could not delay the release, that needed to be addressed in real time. The response of the detector is essentially based on the amplitude - if the first half cycle exceeds the amplitude threshold, then theoretically a corresponding signal is sent to the control element. The detector, but always follows the the envelope amplitude of the received signal, and this is what determines, by the controls, the compression ratio. The decay time depended entirely on controls of that - at the time wherever the envelope of the signal is less than the threshold, the rate of decay sets in. If the signal rises to the top, then decay stops - after another attack of time spent.

  The threshold setting determines the point at which the control starts, and report control determines the rate of Exchange used at that time - and that's why Wikipedia quote is bad, because the absolute level has not been determined at all - just the rate to which the control signal is going in this direction. It may be supplanted by a change of the signal level.

  In any case, it is this that compressors software were essentially try to imitate. I have never designed a software, but I designed and built a couple of material ones - that's why I know not how they work!

  But what is that software that can compensate for certain aspects of the behavior of compressor, because they have not primarily to work in real time. This means that it is possible to use ' to come'. If you do this, then theoretically you can do a good job the same catch the first half cycle of a waveform that exceeds your threshold - because you have already made the detection. And because you control software of the final amplitude rather than a hardware device, you can cause instant changes unfold. But as everyone experiences a software compressor soon realizes, most of the things that are possible not - happen devices are designed more along the lines of the original material, because that's what people really want! They do not want instant attack, because that gets rid of transients, and that's where a lot of crucial information in a signal. Also, for other timed titles of pumping is called for - and that requires a system with a known time response, not one where the rate of change of the input signal is determined and used in any way.

  The other thing that you should keep in mind is that we create a signal envelope. And to do this, we need to make some money. What we are doing is technically known as integration - we are calculating the area under a curve and for that we need a period of integration. With Audition and Cool Edit dynamic controller we get options here to control this. And it's in the section Attack/Release to get you all the clues. First, note that it says that it is the amplitude is determined, not the rate of change, and secondly, you can determine (because it has more options than most of the compressors) how the amplitude envelope is determined in the detector - peak values, which means that the integration time is actually the same as the frequency of sampling, or RMS values. It does not say what is the RMS integration time, but dare I say that it would be too difficult to determine.

  But the dynamics of hearing controller is a good example of how the software can imitate - and also to overcome the limits of the - a hardware compressor. The characteristics of the sensor and the controller can be determined separately, and look forward can also be specified. I'm not 100% convinced that reflects the output always exactly what you set, but it's close enough. But just because you can overcome how works a compressor equipment, it does not usually pay to do unless you have a very good reason to do.

• Plan of MRP option net purchases is picking up items that aren't in the source

  Hi all
  
  Book a command for a particular IO, and after that run MDS with Source as order. SDM picks up the order and apply for the finished good it in. IF I run 'Unchecked' purchases of MRP with MRP workbench Plan of the Net option shows the correct exploded BOM and the provision of child elements.
  
  But when I run the MRP of the same MDS with purchase option Plan net "verified" MRP workbench with nomenclature for this particular finish good exploded shows another big list of items, showing recommendations to cancel, reschedule, etc.
  
  Why MRP pick up these items, which are not part of my MDS? Help, please

  Your question is not clear. You mention "purchases NET option WE ' for both scenarios. Please specify.

• Follow-up of applications for security delays

  When you use the private mode on http://www.lensbest.de/ with activated protection of follow-up, most of the requests are delayed by 1 to 2 seconds. Loading animation is not present in this time interval. For example, the links in the menu and in the footer are affected by the problem.
  If I disable the protection followed in the address bar, the delay goes away.

  I found the problem in Firefox 42. Firefox to reset to the default values and creating a new profile didn't help.

  I can do something on the server to resolve this problem?

  h.Klaus said

  When you use the private mode on http://www.lensbest.de/ with activated protection of follow-up, most of the requests are delayed by 1 to 2 seconds. Loading animation is not present in this time interval. For example, the links in the menu and in the footer are affected by the problem.
  If I disable the protection followed in the address bar, the delay goes away.

  I found the problem in Firefox 42. Firefox to reset to the default values and creating a new profile didn't help.

  I can do something on the server to resolve this problem?

  Could be closed. The problem was caused by a Timeout of Google Tag Manager.

• Hello, after installing the latest upgrades have Jutters screen, keyboard delay of response.

  Menus from sites web drop-down flash and go sometimes black. In all sites, the keyboard responses are delayed. Never had this with previous versions.

  Hello

  You use the 33.0.1 version? Users who have experienced the black screen using the 33 version.

  You can download 33.0.1 from:

  • https://www.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/all/

  Alternatively, if you can see your menus:

  • Help (or

    

    >

    

    ) > about Firefox

  If this does not help, run Firefox in Mode without failure. If Firefox is open, you can restart Firefox Safe mode in the Help menu:

  • Click the menu button

    

    click Help

    

    then select restart with disabled modules.

  If Firefox is not running, you can start Firefox in Mode safe mode as follows:

  • On Windows: Hold down the SHIFT key when you open the desktop Firefox or shortcut in the start menu.

  When the Firefox Safe Mode window appears, select "start mode safe."

  

  To disable hardware acceleration

  • Click the menu button

    

    then select Options.

  • In the window of Firefox Options (or preferences), click on the Advanced tab, and then select general.
  • You will find in the list of parameters, the checkbox use hardware acceleration when available . Clear this check box.

  Now, quit Firefox, wait a few seconds and start normally. Sometimes the problem was caused by the old graphics drivers, so if you want to run with hardware acceleration, try to update these drivers to see if that fixes it.

• Are not relayed queries ARP on bridged Airport Extreme

  I have a router Xfinity and set up Airport extreme as a router jumpered to connect LAN devices on a different floor.

  Looking at network traffic, I noticed that the ARP requests are delayed or not relayed on the router bridge making it appear that these devices are offline.  These applications should get relayed?  Is there a special way to configure this option to get there?

  I used tcpdump to monitor network traffic.

  It is one of these small problems that make it difficult to use sometimes Apple routers... ARP is a problem.

  Apple recommended using the extreme double NAT... I don't like it, but you can see why.

  I recommend using static IP approach.

  Re: time capsule Airport Guard disconnection

  You sound like you know what you're doing, so it's not difficult for a person with some networks nouse.

  Post again if you find this difficult.

  One thing I added is the default domain in the Airport extreme is local and it seems never even change in bridge... I doubt that you can change the domain of the Xfinity router setting but if you can do then. Do local as well since you can not change the configuration of the router from apple.

  Finally if you still want to use the bridge... try connecting to the WAN port ethernet port LAN of the extreme... In bridge WAN is connected to the local network, but it may be less accurate in bridge, you can even set a static IP address and with the connection to the LAN port ethernet customers should get all the information directly from the Xfinity... If your extreme is the KT model... There is definitely something wrong with the extreme WAN.