Rendering with GTX 970 SLI or Crossfire 390 R9 or simple GTX 980Ti

Similar Questions

• Replacement 760ti GTX with GTX 970 in an R2 of Alienware X 51?

  Just did a little research, and from what I can tell the reference GTX 970 and 760ti share the same exact dimensions in length and depth; and use less power at idle and supported; and it gives off less heat.

  Does anyone know if there will be complications with my GTX with a GTX 970 760ti replacement?

  Hello

  So, I also want to put an EVGA gtx 970 in my 51 r2 x. The new alienware x 51 r2s, even with the power supply 330 watts, being supplied with gtx 960s. These require a minimum of 400w, but alienware are themselves uncomfortable with selling them with the new x51s. So I think a 970 should work okay, if you have the 330w PSU. I read a lot of testimony that the x 51 r2s supports the 970 s and same years 980, but I don't want you may have a 980. So I guess I'm torn between 960 and 970

• No help no wiggle effect when rendering with Media Encoder

  Hey!

  I wanted to make my project (by 'add an AE project') media CS4 encoder. After the rendering process

  My effects wiggle that I asked my images did not regard and seemed not at all. When I

  make right with AE4 work.

  I need to change settings or choose a special format in media encoder?

  I would be happy to answer!

  best,

  Alex

  Unfortunately, this is a bug in Adobe Media Encoder - it does not properly handle expressions, if they are created in the default language. If your AE works in English but in German, SOUL SOUL runs the instance of AE context it uses to manage the AE projects also in German and your break expressions, because they are language-specific. Nothing, that you can change. To work around the problem, consider using the wizard to Convert the Expressions into keyframes keyframe before rendering with SOUL. For some layers with simple stuff that should be acceptable, but of course it will be a nightmare with many expressions.

  Mylenium

• Confused about first and GTX 980Ti

  Hello

  leave me perplexed by effects of acceleration @GPU as Lumetri and cuda support first 2015,

  I update my GTX 570 to GTX 980Ti

  with GTX 570, I add a Lumetri effect to a clip and make a correction when I play back I get

  loss of images, first use 90% of the power of the GTX 570 GPU

  with the GTX 980Ti, I played the same music with the same effect of Lumetri and big no. dropped

  framework, but when I add another effect of Lumetri for the same clip I dropped frames and

  noticed that first use only 33% of the power of GTX 980Ti

  I have try other effects of GPU acceleration as the path curves, color correction 3 quick color correction RGB, luma curve, once the first reach 33% the power of GTX 980Ti the loss of images begins

  DaVinci Resolve I add several nodes of correction and amazing job with 97% of the power of GTX 980Ti

  I know that the deprecated 980Ti GPU GTX, but I also know that Quadro M6000 is recommended GPU, and both are using Maxwell GPU GM200

  Quadro M6000 is based on Maxwell GPU GM200

  GeForce GTX 980Ti comes from Maxwell GPU GM200

  Why first using only 33% of the power of 980Ti GTX?

  Is there any thing I can do to let the first using 100% of the power of 980Ti GTX?

  If I can replace GTX 980Ti Quadro M6000 will I get first with 100% of the power of Quadro M6000? and why?

  my system:

  Windows 10 company

  ASUS X 99-A

  I7 - 5820K

  16 GB of Ram

  4 x 2 TB 7200 RPM hard drive Raid 0

  GTX GPU 6 GB 980Ti

  Intensity of DeckLink Pro 4 k

  First 2015.2

  the project setting and all my clips are HD1080 50i uncompresed 10-bit

  Thank you

  Hello

  I found the answer to my question on the addition of 2 Lumetri

  "The Lumetri panel design is precisely to be a simple and easy interface that serves up and down tabs and in one case by video. What was said on the official blog of PrPro & what they said events such as the great NAB show in Las Vegas, I don't think they intend to go further with it. So "does not work" is not really applicable, it is not designed or intended for the way you want it to run. »

  Re: Lumetri: two and more the effects of Lumetri on a clip

  read the entire thread to understand the effect of Lumetri and knowing the limitation in the deal with

  Thanks to all who tried to help

• 970 GTX inside X 51 R3 WITH GTX 1070 inside the amplifier of graphics... it'll work?

  Hello

  I currently own X 51 R3 (10, 16 GB RAM, processor i7 Windows) with card GTX970 video inside.  I was wondering if I could add an extra video GTX 1070 card via featuring graphics amplifier and connect it to my X 51.  Would this work?  If so, install the driver for the 970 & 1070?  Thank you.

  Yes, it should work.  You won't see a performance advantage or anything but the delivery of two cards.  The 1080 does not fit into the X 51 (or if it integrates?).  You'll just need a driver - NVIDIA has a design of unified drivers, so a driver covers all of their modern maps.

• HP Desktop mastering Pegatron Truckee MB SLI with GTX 680 Information

  I just wanted to post this bit of information to you about weather SLI will WORK with HP desktop or not.

  I noticed through the forums on the web and even after having talk with several personal customer support at HP that some say SLI was possible on HP desktop computers and other said that it was not I've talked 4 different HP capacity SLI employee and they have all said that it works on HP desktop even after having them reassures me over and over again.

  I'm here to tell you I gave a test with two EVGA GTX 680 in my HPE-490 and it does not work... the computer will recognize the two cards and allow you to use one as a main card and another form of physx card but the "SLI" option is never accessible to the general public in the same nvidia Control Panel after the graphics card driver update and reset the bios of the motherboard... also tried three different bridges SLI make sure that the bridge was not defective... but these two cards have worked in SLI, immediately after their installation in my computer self built Sandybridge brother.

  Currently I use an EVGA GTX 680 FTW and an OEM GTX 460 as a card... let physx I also tell you that if you decide to use twp graphics cards (one for the card other hand physx) that you need to put your main in the top slot graphics card and the physx card into the slot in the bottom... the motherboard will default to read the top slot as the main Board if two cards are plugged on it in order to make this work you have to do it like that.

  Some of you are probably wondering how can I adapt this in a HP desktop environment... Let me tell you, it's a very tight fit and I had to cut away some of the guts of the computer to make it fit.

  The GTX 680 has been incredible, but there are a few quirks, you must be aware of the especialy if you try to put one of those cards in a computer with not much airflow... these cards will be truly downclock, which can adversely affect performance if hit 70 degrees temperature... so you'll have to add some case fans to blow on the cards (like me) or remove the side panel to allow more fresh air in the case after that I'm ideling at 36 ° c with my two GTX 460 and GTX 680 games I stay less than 62 degrees because I have an aggressive profile fan put in place in precision X keep this way some of you are probably thinking cards will get really strong when you do but as long as you take a 680 GTX which uses the type of spare parts / fans is not a problem... the GTX 680 FTW model uses a quiet fan, which is not unpleasant to blow to it's max, but I also used a stock GTX 680 and it was a little hard to do and the GTX 670 is even stronger running full tilt.

  I wanted to just send you this information in the hope that it may help someone make sure that if you get a card 600 series to improve your diet for a beautiful 650 watts or under power with at least 38 amps on the rail... I recommend the Corsair HX650.

  Happy gaming.

  I got this figured out. They bother running to the PCI-E 2.0X16@16 2.0 as they should.

• I use an AMD Radeon R9 390, rendered with GPU in Media Encoder takes forever. Am I missing something?

  The title says it all.

  I do video in Adobe Media Encoder, but my 20 Minute video takes up to 55 Minutes to restore (1080 p, 10 Mbps). Normally, I should be able to return with OpenCL, but my use of the graphics card is 1% (24% CPU) and Ram at 25%.

  I used an NVIdIa graphics card, and I'm pretty sure that made with the card NVidia is much faster although the R9 is much better.

  So, I'm not an expert. Is there something that I am missing? Is there something I can do?

  Thanks for your time,

  MondRubberduck

  All use CUDA... read this

  creation http://blogs.adobe.com/premiereprotraining/2011/02/CUDA-Mercury-playback-Engine-and-Adobe--pro.html

• Rendering with a GTX 780 Ti GPU accelerated

  I already changed the support.txt file for my Ti 780 to be supported by first pro cs5 but when rendered im a sequence GPU usage never exceeds 10%.

  Is this normal? I expect type of usage to 100% to make it together and to render times be greatly diminished?

  If this is not normal so what can I do about it?

  Any help will be very appreciated because I'm kind of new to this

  Thank you

  Yes, it's normal. See: Tweakers - Style export Page and Page Tweakers - what video card use?

• In view of the XPS 8700 with GTX 970 upgrade, what would be the necessary power supply / & will fit in the case?

  To anyone who has successfully upgraded their diet to accommodate a more power hungry GPUS, what EXACT PSU did you purchase and how much was easy to install? Links to sites of sale would be great.

  Thank you.

  Personally, I bought a power supply Corsair CX600M it was 150mm, so it should fit in your case.

• MPE problem with gtx 580

  Hi, I have a weird problem with my first. I the maximum permissible error material value, but it doesn't seem to be something, and the gpu left unused too.

  I don't think its something to do with the parties, but my pc is:
  I7 970 4.3 GHz

  12 GB of ddr3 memory

  GTX 580 3 GB

  128ssd 500mbps r/w with enough space

  I can't understand why its been nothing. can anyone help? Thank you.

  When you use two monitors Windows Aero can perform playback in real time. I think that there is a message or a thread about tweaking your system to use the PP but I do not know the url of a link. Could someone post the link for you.

• Custom CS5 build with GTX 285 for long-format 4 k projects

I did search non-stop for several days, and it's time to ask for your expertise.  I'd appreciate any help.

I will be ordering a new system of Production Premium CS5, and especially I use first Pro CS5 to edit projects of long duration (huge time with thousands of clips) of Red 4 k footage.  It's a feature film with only a few F / X shots, but we would like to do the same F / X, sound mixing and color correction in CS5 as possible.

Here's what I'm thinking:

CUSTOM BUILD of CYBERPOWERPC (approximately $1950 including items are not):

• OS: Windows 7 Professional x 64
• CPU: Intel® Core™ i7 930 2.80 GHz 8 M Intel Smart Cache LGA1366
• HARD drive: 1 TB SATA II 3.0 Gb/s 16 MB Cache 7200 RPM HARD drive (HDD)
• Motherboard: * (3 - Way SLI Support) w/7.1 SLI/CrossFireX Chipset Ultra Durable™ 3 motherboard ATX DDR3/1600 card mother GigaByte GA-X58A-UD5 Intel X 58 Dolby Audio, eSATA, dual GbLAN, USB3.0, 2 x SATA III RAID, IEEE1394a, 4 PCIe Gen2, 2 PCI PCIe X 1 and 1 + [132]
• MEMORY: Module memory Triple channel DDR3 / 1600 MHz 12 GB (2GBx6) + [219] (Kingston HyperX)
• SOUND: Creative Labs SB X - Fi Xtreme Audio 24 - BIT PCI card sound + [48]
• VIDEO: Nvidia GeForce GTX 285 (I'll have to pull out their card and install myself for GPU acceleration)

1 do you think poor or strange decisions?

2. I liked this mobo due to the possibilities of the chipset and because it has 1394 for DV capture old.  In addition, it has 8 SATA 2.0, 3.0, 2 2 SATA. 2.0 and 2 USB 3.0 eSATA for storage huge/fast forward options.  Is there a better alternative if I'm looking forward to having at least one of each of these formats?

3. I'm going to clone their 1 TB drive OS on a smaller 250 GB disk for use as the OS and then use their 1 TB drive, as part of a 2 TB RAID 0 video storage.  The raid of the mobo or a controller using some type of RAID virtual (like I did in Xp64) will be fine, or do I need a separate RAID controller (as if I had the end of the 1990s).

4. What do you think of this processor and RAM for what I do?  No reason to prefer 2 Quad-Core (if two processors are even compatible with CS5)?  Please let me know if the current configuration will be trolling with huge chronologies with thousands of 4 k clips.

5 maybe I don't need the Creative sound card and could just use the mobo sounds?

6. it will be simple for me to remove the graphics card and install a Nvidia GeForce GTX 285 myself?

7. the Nvidia GeForce GTX 285 appears to be a good target for the GPU acceleration for me since I don't expect to have 4 + layers of videos, although I do multiple effects in 1 or 2 layers.  Would have given a Quadro FX no advantage over the GTX 285 to the huge chronologies with thousands of 4 k clips?  Or benefits for any other use?

8. the GTX 285 has 2 DVI connectors only (more something akin to the S-video).  Can I use a DVI to my workstation and a DVI for video surveillance in real-time on a LCD TV with HDMI/DVI or professional HD video monitor.  No problem with my 4 HD real-time look at a k video / output?  What is the best configuration for your video on an external monitor?  At the time of CS2, I used a 1394 through a camcorder in a professional analog monitor, but it won't be HD, more I heard that there is a problem syncing these days.

Thanks for your advice.

For the longer form material Red 4 K, look at 24 GB of memory, instead of 12. Also consider the i7-980 X instead of the 930, due to the load with long form projects.

Definitely get at least 3 drives additional, set apart from the OS disk and refrain from partitioning. A solid raid configuration may be wise.

• Satellite x 200-21 x with the 8600gt sli - performance in Vista & Games

  Hello

  I'm new here.

  So, I installed all the drivers brand new on my Vista Ultimate, but I noticed a few problems.

  1. where can I find or install turbo 1 GB memory... I noticed that in the screen parameters are the values not displayed as they should be written on information cards and Toshiba;
  2. in the exercise and more games I notice slow, bad performance with SLI mode market, with MSI updates of Microsoft especially for sli and nvidia, as well as 2 times 8600 GT with SLI where is performance?

  I had downloaded all the drivers at Toshiba support page... and here are my results: in the image:
  Link: [http://www.moj-album.com/slika/289812/Rarvg0J6H37YPODv.jpg/#]

  I would be very happy to tell me how can I improve my performance so that the games in Sli mode will go to 1024 x 768 with medium/high details in games like (Call of Duty 4, NFS Prostreet)?

  TX;

  Can someone with a Satellite X 200 and SLI in Geforce 8600gt tell me how to improve performance on my laptop and if its normally with the sli mode, with only 256 MB ram, graphic card 1024Mo all together and dedicated 767 MB, as seen on the link to my graphic card screen;

  Because I think that the graphic representation must be better... and now I don't know what to do?

  On my Satellite X 200 - 21 X I run Vista ultimate, all the latest drivers from toshiba are supported, and I can't play games on the resolution of 1024 x 768 with medium details;
  In COD4 is my default definition 800 x 600 all the way...

  So what I expect help and answers.

• Impossible to print as it says 0 Documents pending for printing with Deskjet 970 Cxi printer

  Original title: my Deskjet 970 Cxi printer

  Guys need help,
  I downloaded the driver for the printer and everything is installed. He is also said to be ready to use, but when I give the Print Option, it always shows 0 Documents waiting to print. Please tell me what to do as my exam is tomorrow...

  Hello

  It seems that you are facing problems with printing.

  -What operating system is installed on your computer?

  -Did you do changes on the computer before this problem?

  Method 1: I suggest you follow the steps in the link to run the troubleshooter and check if that helps.

  Open the printer Troubleshooter

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/open-the-printer-Troubleshooter

  Method 2: I also suggest you to follow the steps from the link and check if the problem persists.

  Why can I not print?

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/why-cant-I-print

  Method 3: If the problem persists, I suggest to follow the steps from the link to HP support and check.

  http://h10025.www1.HP.com/ewfrf/wc/document?DocName=c02205477&tmp_task=solveCategory&cc=us&DLC=en&LC=en&product=61818&task=solveCategory

  For reference:

  http://h10025.www1.HP.com/ewfrf/WC/documentSubCategory?tmp_task=solveCategory&CC=US&DLC=en&LC=en&Product=61818&Task=

  I hope it helps. If you have any questions about printing in the future please let us know. We will be happy to help you.

• X 51 R3 with gtx 1060

  riddled with questions...

  the intel GPU on board works with it, once it's plugged in? or should it be disabled?

  Do gtx 1060 have Optimus? I don't see the intel hd 530 in the nvidia control panel more

  They both should be listed, but having this option disabled no damage either. Make sure you have the correct settings of the BIOS for it to use both. Optimus does not necessarily in x 51 R3 because she have different outputs for the cards and they don't share is not the same path of video.

• 3D with GTX 650Ti graphics issue

  I have problems with the 3d graphics on my Dell XPS. This is very bad, there are several ghost images.  A ghost is red; a green; and maybe another.  It is not usable as is.   I use MS Flight Sim X, and Civilization IV & I installed Civ V.  They all have the same problem.

  I think the problem is with the drivers that were installed automatically on October 17, 2013. The computer has an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti and 3d graphics were very well at that time.

  Under installed programs I see:

  Pilot 3D Vision NVIDIA - installed 17/10/2013 - 320.78 320.78 Version
  NVIDIA Graphics Driver 320.78 - installed 17/10/2013-320.78 Version
  Update NVIDIA 1.14.17 - installed 17/10/2013-1.14.17 Version

  When I go to the NVIDIA website, they do not list the GTX 650 it in hardware for the 320,78 drivers. Would it be these auto-installe by mistake?   If so, what is the procedure to remove and install the correct software? If not, what other information do you need to solve the problem.

  Solved:, it looks that the incorrect drivers were installed on the update to windows 8.1.   I used the driver on Dell.com selection tool to find the correct drivers.  Installed to v326.60 (the above note is 320.78) and problem solved!