Renumbering of the switchports

Similar Questions

• HIP L7680 all-in-One renumbering of the printed pages 1-2-3-vs 3-2-1

  Pages are printed in the order of 3-2-1. How to print in the order of 1-2-3? I use Windows Outlook 2003 on XP, I'm trying to print address cards Contacts.

  Hello

  On the tab page paper layout, you should see something similar to this:

  

  Simply select from the front to the back.

  Kind regards.

• Renumbering of the numbers

  Hi all

  Can someone help me I have a document that contains many said for example that there numberes from 1-100. Here, I want to remove numbers from 1-100 for example say 22, 23 and 23 after the removal of these figures, I want the rest numberes numbering the final number should be 97.

  Im trying with the code but cannot find the answer below.

  myDoc var = app.activeDocument;

  app.findTextPreferences = null;

  app.findTextPreferences.findWhat = "^ 9;

  app.findTextPreferences.position = Position.SUPERSCRIPT;

  var myFound = myDoc.findText ();

  change of var = 0;

  for (var i = 0; i < myFound.length; i ++) {}

  myFound [i] .appliedCharacterStyle = myDoc.characterStyles.item ("Sup");

  {If (myFound [i] .appliedCharacterStyle! = {myDoc.characterStyles.item ("Sup"))}

  app.changeTextPreferences.changeTo = "" + change;

  change ++;

  myDoc.changeText ();

  }

  }

  Thanks in advance,

  Kind regards

  Learner

  So you have to get numbers, no numbers, use Grep to find all the numbers: \d+

  Find all the numbers and replace their contents with the value of the counter of the loop for. no need to bother with that content really is.

  Then you have to work at the end of the numbers found in the beginning because the length of the number wioll change, for example 10 (two digits) can change to 9 (one digit). Like this

  app.findGrepPreferences = null;
  app.findGrepPreferences.findWhat = '\\d+';
  app.findGrepPreferences.position = Position.SUPERSCRIPT;
  numbers = myDoc.findGrep();
  for (i = numbers.length-1; i > -1; i--){
      numbers[i].contents = String(i+1);
      numbers[i].appliedCharacterStyle = myDoc.characterStyles.item("Sup");
  }
  

  Peter

• Renumbering of the file

  Is it possible to number the files in lightroom as filename - 0001.jpg - all my attempts to drop the zero to become filename - 1.jpg

  otherwise, when I download files to my sales page images appear jumbled and out of sequence.

  Open the filename template editor and choose the number sequence format or image suitable from the options offered. The following screenshot shows 3 zeros.

  

• Renumbering of the photographs

  I use Photoshop Elements 6.0.

  I have a sequence of 7 photos in chronological order.  I would like to see the purpose in a slide show, the last picture to drive out of sequence.  I did find a way in organizer or Edit to move a picture from one position to the other.  All I seem to be able to do is 'oldest Date' or 'new Date '.  I tried to return to the Windows folder, where I could and did again sequence photos, but when I ask ge items pictures, it tells me that I have already.  Is there a way to "Resequencing' photos in the manner I have described?

  Thank you.

  quilici Larry wrote:

  I use Photoshop Elements 6.0.

  I have a sequence of 7 photos in chronological order.  I would like to see the purpose in a slide show, the last picture to drive out of sequence.  Is there a way to "Resequencing' photos in the manner I have described?

  Thank you.

  I suggest you read in aid of the PSE on the function of Organizer to do a Album (NOT what is called a Smart Album). An Album allows you to choose photos that you like, then drag and drop the thumbnails of photo to refer to anything that you sequence wish.

  Then when you want to playback of your photos using the display full screen Organizer or use these photos to make a PES created slideshow, you can reference this specific Album (which identifies the photos and the order in which they are displayed).

• SC40220 - iscsi - 2 * FD - unable to discover through the 2nd IP Portal

  Hello

  Trying to get multipath and switch fabric resilience working with installation of FD double on the SC4020. MSDS are ISCSI1 and ISCSI2.

  Addresses IP SAN

  10.154.167.205/24 address IP ISCSI1

  Controller X p1 10.154.167.201/24

  Controller Y p1 10.154.167.203/24

  10.154.168.206/24 address IP ISCSI2

  Controller X p2 10.154.168.202/24

  Controller Y p2 10.154.168.204/24

  As you can see, I have 2 SDS stretching across SAN controllers, IE 1 in ISCSI1 port & port 2 in ISCSI2 on both controllers. The reasoning behind this is that I should be able to maintain the multi-channel operation even if I lose a set on the SC4020 controller.

  Every FD and associated controller ports has been addresses above, every FD has its own 24 and VLAN own. All the switchports are in access mode on a pile of EX4550 of Juniper in the appropriate VLAN and run frames.

  On the side of linux client (oracle 7 UL - 3.8.13 - 35.3.1.el7uek.x86_64) we have two interfaces, hl4 and p3p2 which are also processed in the correct subnets, hl4 is 10.154.167.51/24 and p3p2 is 10.154.168.151/24

  The client can ping the IP addresses of the two ports members successfully as well as ip address of FD when restricted to the interface of good source.

  for example, of hl4 for ISCSI1

  root@PD-TK-DB01 ~ # ping - I hl4 - c1 10.154.167.201
  PING 10.154.167.201 (10.154.167.201) of 10.154.167.51 hl4: 56 (84) bytes of data.
  64 bytes from 10.154.167.201: icmp_seq = 1 ttl = 64 time = 0.063 ms

  -10.154.167.201 - ping statistics
  1 packets transmitted, received 1, 0% packet loss, time 0ms s
  RTT min/avg/max/leg = 0.063/0.063/0.063/0.000 ms
  root@PD-TK-DB01 ~ # ping - I hl4 - c1 10.154.167.203
  PING 10.154.167.203 (10.154.167.203) of 10.154.167.51 hl4: 56 (84) bytes of data.
  64 bytes from 10.154.167.203: icmp_seq = 1 ttl = 64 time = 0,067 ms

  -10.154.167.203 - ping statistics
  1 packets transmitted, received 1, 0% packet loss, time 0ms s
  RTT min/avg/max/leg = 0.067/0.067/0.067/0.000 ms
  root@PD-TK-DB01 ~ # ping - I hl4 - c1 10.154.167.205
  PING 10.154.167.205 (10.154.167.205) of 10.154.167.51 hl4: 56 (84) bytes of data.
  64 bytes from 10.154.167.205: icmp_seq = 1 ttl = 64 time = 0.125 ms

  -10.154.167.205 - ping statistics
  1 packets transmitted, received 1, 0% packet loss, time 0ms s
  RTT min/avg/max/leg = 0.125/0.125/0.125/0.000 ms
  root@PD-TK-DB01 ~ #.

  Ditto for p3p2 for ISCSI2

  root@PD-TK-DB01 ~ # ping - I p3p2-c1 10.154.168.202
  PING 10.154.168.202 (10.154.168.202) of 10.154.168.151 p3p2: 56 (84) bytes of d ata.
  64 bytes from 10.154.168.202: icmp_seq = 1 ttl = 64 time = 0,123 ms

  -10.154.168.202 - ping statistics
  1 packets transmitted, received 1, 0% packet loss, time 0ms s
  RTT min/avg/max/leg = 0.123/0.123/0.123/0.000 ms
  root@PD-TK-DB01 ~ # ping - I p3p2-c1 10.154.168.204
  PING 10.154.168.204 (10.154.168.204) of 10.154.168.151 p3p2: 56 (84) bytes of d ata.
  64 bytes from 10.154.168.204: icmp_seq = 1 ttl = 64 time = 0,113 ms

  -10.154.168.204 - ping statistics
  1 packets transmitted, received 1, 0% packet loss, time 0ms s
  RTT min/avg/max/leg = 0.113/0.113/0.113/0.000 ms
  root@PD-TK-DB01 ~ # ping - I p3p2-c1 10.154.168.206
  PING 10.154.168.206 (10.154.168.206) of 10.154.168.151 p3p2: 56 (84) bytes of d ata.
  64 bytes from 10.154.168.206: icmp_seq = 1 ttl = 64 time = 0.116 ms

  -10.154.168.206 - ping statistics
  1 packets transmitted, received 1, 0% packet loss, time 0ms s
  RTT min/avg/max/leg = 0.116/0.116/0.116/0.000 ms
  root@PD-TK-DB01 ~ #.

  If the basic network connectivity is fine.

  iSCSI configured on the client as follows:

  iface m iscsiadm - I ISCSI1 o new
  iface m iscsiadm - I ISCSI2 o new
  iface m iscsiadm-ISCSI1 o Update - n iface.net_ifacename - v hl4
  iface m iscsiadm-ISCSI2 o Update - n iface.net_ifacename - v p2p3

  If you are still with me now, the problem is the following. Anything done to the targets of ISCSI1 is very well. Discovery works as expected.

  root@PD-TK-DB01 ~ # iscsiadm-m - t st Pei 10.154.167.205 discovery - I ISCSI1
  10.154.167.205:3260, 0 iqn.2002 - 03.com.compellent:5000d31000ac201c
  10.154.167.205:3260, 0 iqn.2002 - 03.com.compellent:5000d31000ac201d
  10.154.167.205:3260, 0 iqn.2002 - 03.com.compellent:5000d31000ac201e
  10.154.167.205:3260, 0 iqn.2002 - 03.com.compellent:5000d31000ac201f
  root@PD-TK-DB01 ~ #.

  but not for ISCSI2

  root@PD-TK-DB01 ~ # iscsiadm-m - t st Pei 10.154.168.206 discovery - I ISCSI2
  iscsiadm: no portals found

  Don't forget I can ping 10.154.168.206, * I can even telnet to it on 3260 to prove connectivity TCP is good, but it won't allow me to see anything through it.

  When I added the definition to the server on the San and attempt to add the two HBAs that corresponding to the hl4/ISCSI1 appears as with the correct initiator; but with 4 virtual controller ports, 2 per controller port in ICSI1 physics. What worries me, I expect only 1 per physical port as each customer HBA can see only two physical ports altogether.

  I can add an HBA corresponding to p3p2, but it just never came up.

  We are not permissioned for compellent yet portal if can't whitepapers or baselines that can exist in there, but surely what we are trying is a fairly basic facility and we shouldn't have trouble with it.

  Out of curiosity - is the operating system on the server object set multipath in SC interface? I don't see any errors in your basic configuration, so I wonder if its something simple/specific to the supreme court as mapping

• Clarity on the Trunking Modes

  Hi all

  This may seem trivial to most of you, but I even rolled my head around the dells.

  I just noticed that my traffic vlan trunking on a SHIFT the evacuation for VLANs as unmarked rule.

  I used the switchport mode trunk and allowed the VLAN necessary at both ends, from Cisco, it was what really should be done.

  What else do I need to do on the dales to mark traffic VLAN and can be done during production without any waste of time?

  Thanks in advance!

  Hello

  Thanks for the reply, in fact it seems, I watched the channel of port summary and all them VLAN are tagged.

  I have focused on a singular interface in this vlan, which said it was without a label!

  * blonde moment! *

  Thank you

• Command switchport mode access

  Hello

  I was curious about the switchport mode access command and its interoperability with the switchport command in vlan voice.

  If I set up a switchport with the switchport mode access commmand, which will make it impossible for the switchport create a trunk special cases with the IP phone? Even if I set up switchport vlan speech?

  And if so, the port should be configured as switchport mode dynamic auto? Or desirable?

  Thank you, Pat

  Pat, you can configure a port as an access port, add the configuration of vlan voice and connect a phone and another device. The trunk will form. With the "vlan voice" Cisco obscures the fact that forms a trunk. I don't necessarily agree with this strategy, and it wasn't always in this way. I remember configuration of phones on a 3500XL and ports have been configured in trunks.

  You made me think, so I issued a few commands on a WS-C3560V2-48PS-S running IOS 12.2 (58) SE2 who has 12 phones connected on it.

  Here is the config for a port that has a connected phone:

  Switch #sho int f0/2nd round

  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 475 bytes

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/2

  switchport access vlan 11

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport trunk vlan 11 native

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 2, 10-19

  switchport mode access

  switchport nonegotiate

  switchport voice vlan 12

  SRR-queue bandwidth share 1 30 35 5

  priority queue

  MLS qos trust device cisco-phone

  MLS qos trust cos

  Auto qos voip cisco-phone

  No auto mdix

  spanning tree portfast

  service-policy input AUTOQOS-SRND4-CISCOPHONE-POLICY

  end

  If I show the status of the trunk for an individual port that IOS recognizes that the port with the attached telephone is actually a trunk:

  Switch #sho int f0/2 trunk

  VLAN Mode Encapsulation native port State

  FA0/2 off 802. 1 q non-gaine 11

  Port VLAN allowed on trunk

  FA0/2, 11-12

  Port VLAN authorized and active in the field of management

  FA0/2, 11-12

  VLAN port extending on transmission State and no tree pruned

  FA0/2, 11-12

  However if I do a "sho int trunk" to display all the ports on the switch IOS trunk does not include telephone ports in the output.

  Trunk switch #sho int

  VLAN Mode Encapsulation native port State

  FA0/45 on 802. 1 q 12 trunking

  FA0/46 / 802. 1 q 12 trunking

  Gi0/1 on 802. 1 q sheath 11

  Gi0/2 of 802. 1 q sheath 11

  Port VLAN allowed on trunk

  FA0/45 2: 10-19

  FA0/46 2: 10-19

  Gi0/1, 2, 10-19

  Gi0/2, 2, 10-19

  Port VLAN authorized and active in the field of management

  FA0/45 13, 16-2, 11-17

  FA0/46 13, 16-2, 11-17

  Gi0/1, 2, 11-13, 16-17

  Gi0/2 13, 16-2, 11-17

  VLAN port extending on transmission State and no tree pruned

  FA0/45 13, 16-2, 11-17

  FA0/46 13, 16-2, 11-17

  Gi0/1, 2, 11-13, 16-17

  Gi0/2 13, 16-2, 11-17

  So firstly IOS says "Yes, it is a trunk" and on the other hand it is said ' Nope, no trunks here! So notice that 'spanning-tree portfast' is configured on f0/2, no 'portfast spanning-tree trunk. PortFast is still active on this port.

  Switch #sho span int f0/2 selection

  VLAN0011 enabled

  VLAN0012 enabled

  Conversely on 45 port, we have a VG-224 connected and it is configured with "switchport mode trunk" and "trunk spanning-tree portfast '. If I change than just "spanning-tree portfast' we see this:

  Switch #sho span int f0/45 selection

  VLAN0002 disabled

  VLAN0011 disabled

  VLAN0012 disabled

  VLAN0013 disabled

  VLAN0016 disabled

  VLAN0017 disabled

  Cisco has confused the issue here. I would prefer if we called a trunk, a trunk, but for some reason, they do not.

  See you soon,.

  -Jeff

  ---

  Posted by Jeff Davis of the Cisco support community App WebUser

• Mode of the switch port to connect to a router

  I wonder what mode to set the switchport is connected to a router.

  I guess the cable between the router is connected to a port in trunk mode (for all the VLANS defined)? Then I Lass with gateways for VLANs pointing to the router routing interfaces?

  So in this way, if a neighboring switch does not know how to route a packet to an unknown IP address, the packet is sent on the trunk to the other switch. Here the appropriate VLAN SVI sends the packet to the appropriate router interface. Is this correct or nearly correct?

  Hi Atle,

  You can connect a trunk port or port access to a router. If you choose to use an access port, the router will form an adjacency only through the VIRTUAL LAN defined in this access port. If you choose a trunk port, you can use dot1q encapsulation on subinterfaces of adjacencies form on several VLANs. If you use a trunk you would this type of configuration:

  On the switch:

  item in gi1/0/1 interface

  switchport mode trunk

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport trunk allowed vlan a to c

  On the router

  gi0/0.a interface

  encapsulation dot1q one

  IP address x.x.x.x y.y.y.y

  !

  interface gi0/0.b

  encapsulation dot1q b

  IP address v.v.v.v y.y.y.y

  !

  interface gi0/0.c

  encapsulation dot1q c

  IP address z.z.z.z y.y.y.y

  Here's a good tutorial on this subject:

  http://www.howtonetwork.NET/public/708.cfm

  Cisco service documentation:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/12_0t/12_0t1/feature/guide/8021Q.html

  To answer your question, you can use the router as a default gateway for hosts. In this case, should not have an IVR on the switch, except for MANAGEMENT purposes. Traffic from the hosts would take the path of the L2 to the router and then the router would make the next decision of transfer for the package. If you have two routers, you could do a safe for both routers and run a FHRP between them for redundancy.

  HTH

  Anthony

• switchport port-security problem

  Hi all

  I wanted to test using the switchport port-security with mac address fixed for voip and sticky for the vlan access.
  to do this, I created the following configuration:

  switchport port-security maximum 2
  switchport port-security
  aging of the switchport port security 5
  switchport port-security-address mac sticky
  voice of vlan switchport port-security-address mac e8ba.7006.59a4

  the problem is the mac address that switch learns to access vlan, never goes away even if the device is no longer connected.

  switchport port-security maximum 2
  switchport port-security
  aging of the switchport port security 5
  switchport port-security-address mac sticky
  switchport port-security-address mac c434.6b24.5db9 sticky vlan access
  voice of vlan switchport port-security-address mac e8ba.7006.59a4

  Can you help me?

  This should make them disappear without having to use any statement when the switchport learns a new mac again if his manual, you have to bounce the port as well

  Disable them sticky interface port-security

• 2960 will not allow "switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q" CLI

  I have a Cisco 2960 switch that does not allow me to configure the switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q on a trunking interface.

  The features of the watch that the interface can use 802. 1 q, but when I try to CLI the command encapsulation of work is not an option.

  Please give us a solution.

  Thank you, S

  Model - WS-C2960G-24TC-L

  Version SW - 12.2 (44) SE6

  Image of SW - C2960-LANBASEK9-M

  S1 #.

  S1 #sh int gi0/23 capabilities

  GigabitEthernet0/23

  Model: WS-C2960G-24TC-L

  Type: 1000BaseLX SFP

  Speed: 1000

  Duplex: full

  ENCAP of trunk. type: 802. 1 q

  Trunk mode: on, off, desirable, nonegotiate

  Channel: Yes

  Removal of broadcast: percentage(0-100)

  FlowControl: rx-(off,on,desired), tx-(none)

  Fast Start: Yes

  QoS scheduling: rx-(not configurable on a per port basis),

  TX-(4q3t) (3T: two configurable values and one fixed.)

  Rewrite coS: Yes

  ToS rewrite: Yes

  UNI-DIRECTIONAL: Yes

  Food online: no

  SPAN: source/destination

  PortSecure: Yes

  Dot1x: Yes

  Several Types of media: rj45, sfp, automatic selection

  S1 #.

  S1 #.

  S1 #.

  S1(Config-if) #switchport?

  Set the access mode characteristic of the interface

  Backup set for the backup interface

  block disable them unknown addresses forwarding uni/multi interpreters

  host port Set

  the interface Set trunking mode

  nonegotiate device engage not in the negotiation protocol on this

  interface

  port-security security associated with order

  priority Set 802 .1p device priority

  protected configure an interface to be a protected Harbor

  trunk trunking features Set of interface

  device attributes voice voice

  S1 #.

  S1 #.

  S1 #.

  S1(Config-if) #switchport trunk?

  admitted only allowed together features VLAN when the interface is in binding mode

  native definition trunking features native when the interface is trunking

  mode

  pruning pruning Set VLAN features when the interface is in binding mode

  S1 #.

  S1 #.

  S1 #.

  New devices do not support ISL so you can run 802. 1 q. This means there is no need of an encapsulation command what an encapsulation being supported. If the device has support for ISL, then you must also this command.

  Daniel Dib
  CCIE #37149

  Please evaluate the useful messages.

• Cannot connect the switch Cisco Cisco SG300 - 28 p spend and traffic through VLANS

  Try to connect the Cisco SG300 - 28 p switch to another switch and proceed 2 VLANS between them.  Not doing any circuit.  If I connect a computer to the port on the SG300 - 28 p I can access the VLAN 2 and take a DHCP address. However, when I connect to another switch on the port and connect it to a port on another switch secondary I am unable to access VLAN 2 and pull an IP address.  I checked that the works of secondary switch (WS-C3560G-48PS-S) connected to the other 3500 s, but not this latest SG300 - 28 p.  Here's the configuration for both, I'm leaving areas that shouldn't matter and add if necessary.  Try to connect the SG300 - 28 p Port 26-WS-C3560 Port 1 port.  Once again, if I connect a computer to port 26 on the SG300 - 28 p I access the VLAN 2 as expected, but not when I connect to channel 2 on the secondary switch.

  Cisco SG300 - 28 p

  !
  interface vlan 1
  Internet name
  !
  interface vlan 2
  LAN name
  IP 172.20.5.11 255.255.0.0
  no ip address dhcp (this is the VLAN I'm moving)
  !
  interface vlan 3
  private name
  !
  interface vlan 4
  name of Nortel
  !
  interface vlan 101
  name Video_Project
  !
  interface gigabitethernet26
  Description VLAN2-ACCESS-CISCO3500
  switchport mode access
  switchport access vlan 2 (this goes to port 1 on the other Cisco 3500 switch to provide access 2 VLAN)

  Cisco 3500

  !
  interface Vlan1
  NATCO Internet description
  no ip address
  no ip route cache
  no ip mroute-cache
  !
  interface Vlan2
  NATCO LAN description
  IP 172.20.5.13 255.255.0.0
  no ip route cache
  no ip mroute-cache (this is the VLAN I'm moving)

  !
  interface Vlan3
  Description LHPrivate
  no ip address
  no ip route cache
  no ip mroute-cache
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/1
  switchport access vlan 2 (this is the port that I connect to the SG300 - 28 p)

  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/2
  switchport access vlan 2 (this is the port I hang my computer to and trying to access VLAN 2 other switch)

  Hello

  Yes, STP is the problem here. As you can see on your release of the Cisco 3500 switch, port Gi0/1 is BKN (The FEW is a shortened form of "Broken").

  This is caused by an incompatibility of versions PLEASE used between the two switches. Small businesses (including series SG300) switches are use legacy STP or Rapid STP (your case), but uses templates to business (such as catalyst 3500) PVST + (each VLAN spanning tree version of STP).

  Two versions between group of switches are compatible only under certain conditions. Important condition is that the two switchports needs to use a VLAN 1, vlan access/native and not any other number VLAN.

  It is to make your communication work, you must:

  • disable the STP at least 3500 Cisco switch:
    • on overall global (Switch (config) # no vlan spanning tree 2)
    • or by the base interface (switch(config-if) # no vlan spanning tree 2)
  • change the configuration of your connection between two switches by following the path:
    • change the switchport trunk (trunk switchport mode) mode
    • do 1 VLAN as native vlan (vlan switchport trunk native 1)
    • Towing VLAN 2 as vlan tagged on that Stump (switchport trunk allow vlan add 2)

• There is no command 'Switchport Voice Vlan"on SF300 - 24 p!

  Hello everyone

  I am in an urgent problem: S

  I have a small business SF300 - 24 p

  I created two vlans one data and one voice

  but I have not assigned to ports and I do not know how, because there is no command ' switchport voice vlan "under the interface!

  Here are the configurations

  BTW the switchport mode is always trunk as it is by default

  Thanks in advance

  switch0a1172 #.

  switch0a1172 #.

  switch0a1172 #sho run

  config-file-header

  switch0a1172

  v1.2.9.44 / R750_NIK_1_2_584_002

  CLI v1.0

  SSD of encrypted file indicator

  @

  SSD-control-start

  config of SSD

  control of password file unrestricted SSD

  no control of the integrity of the file ssd

  SSD-control-end cb0a3fdb1f3a1af4e4430033719968c0

  !

  database of VLAN

  VLAN 13.20

  output

  ID of the vlan 20 voices

  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 0001e3 Siemens_AG_phone___

  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00036 b Cisco_phone___

  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00096e Avaya___

  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 000fe2 H3C_Aolynk___

  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 0060 b 9 Philips_and_NEC_AG_phone

  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00d01e Pingtel_phone___

  VLAN voice Yes-table add Polycom/Veritel_phone___ 00e075

  Add a voice vlan Yes-table 00e0bb 3Com_phone___

  hostname switch0a1172

  username, encrypted password cisco c8e383b1dd7be99f878a387d87766e875404e0b3 priv

  LG 15

  The telnet server IP

  !

  interface vlan 13

  name "VLAN13".

  !

  interface vlan 20

  VOICE name

  !

  switch0a1172 #.

  It does it automatically via the port smart auto based on external trigger default. Devices to enable CDP and LLDP are supported.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Cisco NAC appliance - after a success does not change users to connect to the vlan propper

  Hello

  I am new to cisco NAC BURNERS and I have to troubleshoot an implementation. It is a real OOB IP gateway configuration. Users can connect to the Pentecost the CCA, but after the connection of this success, they remain on the role not authenticated, as well as on this vlan. I checked the SNMP protocol and seems to work very well. Also, I checked the logs on nac_manager.log and there is nothing surprising, in fact I see nothing about this user or IP address that connects.

  Also the user does not appear on the list of users online on cam.

  Can someone help me figure out how can I fix? version 4.8, I'll post any information requested

  Thank you

  We recently had the problem with Windows AD SSO and Windows 7 clients.

  Would authenticate the XP clients very well, however, Windows 7 clients would not authenticate and will remain just on the authenticated vlan.

  Our question was looking for CASE SSO account, we installed on AD. It only support the encryption, WHICH has no Windows 7 64. We turned off "Use OF THE encryption" on the account authentication UNIQUE AD and re-tested.

  What are the parameters of the port-profile to which is applied the switchport?

  What is the map settings vlan ports trunk not approved or confidence?

• The trunk port vs access port speed

  I'm going to put in place a 4900M for a temporary training class, for 1 GB PC connected client.  I used an interface of 10 GB with a X 2-10 G - SR which will connect via fiber 62.5 microns, to a 10 GB interface 4948 with an SFP-10 GB - SR.  With respect to the config, I have the installer of the te1/1 4900 M as a port of access to the 4948.  Connectivity is fine, as well as the routing.  But when we use the client connectivity of the PC (connection to 10 GB of storage) drive, we get speeds of great reading but when he tries to write, it slows down and ends in error.

  Question 1: Would it make a difference if the 4900M was connected via a trunk port to the 4948?

  I think the problem is the maximum length and the length of the fibre 62.5 transmit\receive transceivers, but I want to dismiss the switchport configuration.

  I doubt very much if a trunk port change would make a difference.

  Certainly not something I've ever met.

  Jon