Reorganisation of our group

Similar Questions

• We have virtual machines on one of our groups that show alarms, but when you click on the tabs, alarms, or tasks and events there is no corresponding alert.

  We have virtual machines on one of our groups that show alarms, but when you click on the tabs, alarms, or tasks and events there is no corresponding alert.

  Can you try to make a vmotion host and see if it gets resolved? If not, can you close the virtual machine and start again? I have seen this problem before and a stop and start resolved.

• Adding a new PS6100XS to our group

  Hello

  We recently bought a new PS6100XS to add to our existing Equallogic group that contains 1 PS4100X and 1 PS4100XV.  I read on the forums that I would not add the table of hybrid PS6100XS to the current storage pool, but I should rather create a new storage pool as the load balancer isn't also distribute the IOPS / s in the table of the hybrid.  Recommendation of this Dell is a best practices document, that I missed?

  In addition, my plan is to add the PS6100XS to the current group and create a new storage pool to move volumes of the original pool him so I can move the firmware on these two tables with no impact to production.

  I know that Dell only supports the management of the different firmware for the time that he need to update the firmware on the other berries, but I wonder if it would be that a problem with the volume moves because they will be at different levels of FW.  The two PS4100s are running 5.2.2 (I can see Don W grimace as I type that).  Thanks for your comments.

  Jake

  ;-)

  The load balancer will work with hybrid matrices.  What can sometimes happen which is a relatively smaller hybrid with very large paintings SATA.   So, no matter what most of the work will be done by the SATA bays, since they have the majority of the space.

  A lot depends on the type of I/o, the group is handling.

  assuming that the 6100 is 6.0.x, level to 6.0.10 first.  QA can't test all combinations of the firmware and the operations of the table, then you might have a problem to a volume pool poolside 6.0.x 5.2.x.

  Kind regards

• How to group messages between different phones

  Hi, my friend just got a Galaxy and told us we could still message group with my other friend and I of the iphone. But its been three days and my friends on the Galaxy can only get our messages when they are sent only to him directly. Is there a way to fix this? or at least make it if our group messages can still function...

  Hello

  If your friend was previously using an iPhone, ask them to check that she struck out iMessage / off iMessage, now that she's using a non-Apple Phone:

  https://selfsolve.Apple.com/deregister-IMessage/

• Orientation of storage group

  Hi all

  We are expanding our storage environment and wanted some advice on setting up our group/pools.

  We currently consisting of 12 TB PS4000E storage group, it is used as mass storage for files and archiving of mail servers. All volumes are in the default storage pool.

  We bought a 24 CT PS4100E and a 14 TB PS6100X to add to this group. The idea is to migrate existing data from Vault/e-mail on the server of the PS4000E file, so it can be removed from the Group and used elsewhere in the company.

  In scenario 1 we add two devices in the Group and separate storage pools and migrating volumes from the storage pool by default for the pool containing the PS4100E. Then remove the PS4000E of the group.

  In scenario 2 we have the PS4100E and the PS6100X in the same pool of storage and migrate the data in the same way. The group can then distribute the data as seems it.

  In the future we will migrate VM storage over another group, containing a PS5000.

  What are the considerations of raid level and pool for these scenarios? RAID5 has been recommended for both of the new features, but can they coexist in the same pool and work well with the same level of raid?

  Thanks in advance.

  Jim

  Yes, you can run different RAID levels in the same pool and through different speeds with him when to use the latest version of the firmware (5.x and v6.x).

  You can add new members in any combination you like (an a R10 two R10 or the two R6, or alone as a R6).  APLB (Automatic Performance Load Balancing) will examine various aspects of i/o, disk speed, type, RAID and determine the best placement for the slices of volume and move the data according to the needs (in the background) to provide the best performance.

  Just note that because the SAS bays generally have more space, volumes have generally several sections on the largest capacity table.

  -joe

• Group mappings

  You will have to type certain powers of the brain here. I can map an NT account to a group ACS? If I have a group on our domain called tngrp, can I map it to a HSCguest of ACS group? It will be the groups more detailed if these groups must be checked before our group of NT login domain?

  Thank you

  Dwane

  Yes, Yes and Yes. You can map windows at the ACs groups groups. The traps are:

  You cannot use the nested in AD groups (e.g. testgroup contains testgroup1 and testgroup2).

  A user can not mapped to several groups of ACS. For this reason, as you said, you want the largest groups first. For example, if you want admins to map to administrators and users of map users, you must set the admins above users mapping mapping (assuming that all admins are users).

  -Eric

• creating groups of VLAN - traffic disruption

  I asked this question of TAC and got a vague response, so I was going to post here to see if someone had actually done this and what were their results.

  We have a fairly basic config of UCS currently, there is a port on each fabric channel and our uplinks can take care of all our VLAN so all VLAN can use all uplinks.

  We will soon add a new channel of port that will only serve the VLAN specific (trafifc for the external VCC of our Nexus 7 k). So we will now have a disjoint network layer 2, where VLAN 1xx require port-channel 1 and VLAN 4xx can only use the port-channel 2.

  I have read all Cisco docs and it seems rather simple to deal with groups VLAN so that we make sure VLANS only try to use correct rising/port-channel binding, however our concern is moving all our VLAN existing in a group VLAN and the final outcome of this. I ran this by TAC and they said that there could be a "brief traffic disruption" when we apply this config.

  It gives me some anxiety b/c we are talking about all our ESXi hosts and each VM on these hosts (500 +). However it may be brief, that could be a problem if all of a sudden everything is unable to speak.

  Someone had an existing config that they moved to a configuration group VLAN and what has been your experience? It disrupt all traffic?

  We have not added the new port-channel, so everything we do now is entering a group of our existing VLANs and by assigning them to the existing port-channel.

  Any comments or thoughts would be appreciated

  We did just that. We moved in four areas separated into four groups of clan. We have created our groups and then all the VLAN for this corresponding uplink at the same time. We didn't see any packet loss or impact to end users.

  We have a facility of similar size. About 20 blades, ESXi server and windows, behind the pair of FIs. About 400 machines behind that. The movement is quick and easy.

  Previously, we were using the uplink of LAN Manager. I found it a bit heavy. Clan group works much easier in my opinion.

  Plan a window of maintenance, to be careful, but my experience of 25 VLAN moving through four interfaces different disjoint layer 2, we have not had any problems.

• The ACS user groups

  I have a problem.

  We have 2 groups that are created in ACS, group 1: access Ganymede and 2:Radius Access group. Group 1 has the people that have been created on the server ACS itself. The 2nd group is dynamic to users who are enabled access through Manager users for domains. We do not want to have the 2nd group in order to access our routers and switches with their Accounts of Microsoft, they can now, at least insofar as, at the prompt to activate it. I wish I had 2 completely independent from the other groups. Our group 1 is used only for our administrators to have access to all of our network devices.

  I'm sure some type of filtering or to a group of addresses IP could be implemented on GBA, but I'm not sure where, if this is the case.

  Can someone please!

  Thank you!

  Matt

  You must set up Network Access Restrictions (NAR), group 2 to not be able to access the routers/switches to restrict.

  Make sure the Group and level NAR is checked under the Interface of configuration - Advanced Options. Then go under Group 2, NAR section, check the box "Set IP access restrictions", select Table sets 'Appeal denied Points', and then select each of the routers/switches, using a * for the Port and address and add them to the table.

  It doesn't matter that in Group 2 will refuse to authenticate on one of the routers/switches.

• Can groups share agreements signed pending under the tab "manage"?

  I work with my admin on create and edit the parameters of our group and our goal is to allow multiple users in each ministerial group share the same list of Out for Signature / signature / cancelled / archived agreements to the title of the tab 'manage '.  Is this possible?  Or groups serve only as a means to assign the account settings for different sets of users?

  Hi Wesley,

  Groups are not intended for this purpose. Groups are for users with same account settings.

  However, I agree that it's a pretty nice feature to have. I hope that it is picked up and implemented quickly.

  Thank you

  Sameer Puri

• Issues group

  One of our groups gives error below, and we need to know what can be done to correct the problem.

  Configuration problems:

  R not enough resources to satisfy the Vsphere HA failover the cluster level

  This message is caused by the admission control, please see the links for some of the below troubleshooting tips:

  Not enough resources to meet the HA failover the cluster level

  VMware: Fixing of insufficient resources to meet the level of failover configured for HA. geekswing.com

• Scipt PowerCli to find VM outside groups of DRS in VMware clusters configuration rules

  Hello

  
  I have a cluster VMware DRS rules enabled, with 'Virtual Machines to hosts' type.

  
  Whenever a virtual machine is created, it must be added manually in one of our group of DRS within the parameters of the VMware cluster rules. To check if this action has not been forgotten, we need run a script with PowerCli, showing the virtual machine that are not present in the Group of DRS.

  
  any idea to create this kind of script?

  
  Thanks for your help

  
  Concerning

  Would this be something like this work?

  $cluster = get-Cluster-name mycluster

  $vmsInGroup = $cluster. ExtensionData.ConfigurationEx.Group | Where {$_-is [VMware.Vim.ClusterVmGroup]} | %{

  Notice-EEG-Id $_. VM | Select the name of ExpandProperty-

  }

  Get-VM-location $cluster | Where {$vmsInGroup - notcontains $_.} Name} |

  Select the name of ExpandProperty-

  The script first gets the names of all virtual machines that are used in any VM Group on the cluster.

  Then he gets all the virtual machines in the cluster and displays only the names of these virtual machines that are not in a VM group

• Creating rule of compliance for the Add Group to the local Administrators group for the Machine.

  I try to write a compliance rule that can add an Active Directory group to a local group on a machine. For example the addition of our group of COMPUTER security in the local Administrators group on some machines.

  Any help with this would be greatly appreciated.

  DK

  The name refers on behalf of the group, so the first line is correct, but you must change the other Member who appoints the members of the group.  It would be like this, 'Member AS Server Ops % '.  I'm guessing that server Ops is a security AD Group, then you could also do "members = DOMAIN\Server Ops.  Usually best to select by pressing the 3 points and choosing from the available groups to make sure that you do not have typo and you have selected the correct attribute.

• Role of group leader

  Recently, we have noticed in our of our groups BOWL that, even if several people were given the role of creator and Coordinator by using the administration tool, they didn't have access to the members page where they could make changes. The original group manager might, but not the additional people, account required to these roles. Our best estimate is, and tests it seems that you have only one shot at naming the 'group management' at the stage of creation of the first group and that the role of the creator and Coordinator are different Group Manager.  The person originally is no longer used at Oracle, so cannot be 100% certain that what happened.

  Can someone confirm if this is the expected behavior for groups BOWL?

  Thank you

  Marjie

  My answer to someone offline - you can add handlers for additional groups of the tool create group/add new members by clicking on the name of the Group and add another email address in the field "Group Manager email. It is the only way that someone else may have access to make changes to group member.

• How I have queries about available groups?

  Hi all

  We are working on a front-end server to create users, instead of using the user administration form. We want to create a dynamic list if our groups on a form, but we do not know where to get the list of groups of. We are on APEX 4.1.

  Thank you

  Well, if I understand your question right, I think you're looking for these points of view:

  APEX_WORKSPACE_GROUPS

  APEX_WORKSPACE_GROUP_USERS

  I used this SQL to find:

  select *
  from apex_dictionary
  where column_id = 0
  and apex_view_name like '%GROUP%'
  

  Thank you

  -Jorge

  http://rimblas.com/blog/

• Next meeting of the Group of the user?

  Has anyone heard when the next user group meeting will be?

  I would like to see Randy give us a glimpse of the 4.1 changes,.

  and if a training class is coming to Albany anytime soon.

  Funny you should ask today because we just confirm the date with VMware for August 5.   I'll post a notice on the forum and if you are part of the mailing list for our group you will get an invitation by e-mail shortly.  If you have not already please register here http://bit.ly/vmugsignup.  Randy will be there. -Scott