Result of the incorrect calculation

Similar Questions

• Bad results using the scientific calculator

  When you use the scientific calculator of Wondows 7, when I type 126/(3.6*6.48), I get a wrong result: 23.328. When I use Excel to do the same, I get the correct result: 5.40. Any idea?

  I tried this using the scientific calculator and got the correct results, enter the numbers exactly how you wrote them and then hit equal.

• Make the result of the empty calculation if a factor is equal to 0

  I found a similar discussion with this thread, but it didn't answer exactly what I needed. I wish that the result of a calculation that is simple to be empty if a factor is empty or zero.

  For example, I have a calcuation C field that is the sum of the fields A and B. A will always have a value, but B does not. If B is empty or 0, I C does not show any output value. Is this possible in Acrobat? Thank you.

  Sure. A custom calculation script might look like:

  (function () {}

  Get the first value in the field, as a number

  var v1 = + getField("text1").value;

  Get the second field value, as a string

  var S2 = getField("text2").valueAsString;

  Converts a string to a number;

  var v2 = + s2

  Set this field to the sum value if the second field is not empty or if not equal to zero

  Event.Value = s2 & v2! == 0 ? v1 + v2;:

  })();

• Different results from the same calculations between SQL and PL/SQL

  This SQL statement:

  select 1074 * (4 / 48) from dual;

  Gives the 89.5 result.
  However this PL/SQL block

  declare
      tmp     NUMBER;
  begin
      SELECT 1074 * (4 / 48) into tmp from dual;
      dbms_output.put_line('Result '||tmp);
  end;

  Gives a different result:
  Result 89.49999999999999999999999999999999999996
  
  If I change and give my variable tmp, a precision and scale, (38.36) say the result is 89.5.
  
  Ed. I did about 10g (10.2.0.4.0) and 11g (11.1.0.7.0) with the same result in both.
  
  Published by: kendenny on July 9, 2010 10:19 for more information

  What is your current value of NUMLARGEUR in SQL * more (I assume that you use as your tool)?

  SQL> set numwidth 50
  SQL> select 1074 * (4 / 48) from dual;
  
                                         1074*(4/48)
  --------------------------------------------------
           89.49999999999999999999999999999999999996
  

• calculate the two result of the variance fields

  I've got 2 fields of digital type called 'registration' and "count". "on the record" field is pre-filled and the user enters the new number in the field "counts". The number of "count" can be more or less "on file" on the ground. I would like the result in the variance calculation to be more or less.

  and there will be total at the bottom of the column 'variance '. Here is the picture which shows the fields in the table.

  Please help with this script

  

  Thanks for your help!

  ~ jbazum

  Take a look at the attachment. Change the calculation of the variance, if necessary.

  

  Steve

• Please can someone help me on how toedit calculation result to the point

  Please can someone help me on how toedit calculation result to the point

  Can you post an example page upward on the hosted site for Oracle?  Apex. Oracle.com (you need a workspace).

  So to repeat what you have posted:

  You have a page with 3 items P1_N1, P1_N2 and P1_SOM...  You want to P1_N1 and P1_N2 to be text boxes that accept input, and when you enter the values you want the sum of these values to be stored in P1_SOM, correct?

  Take a look at this page: http://glassfish1.revion.com/apex/f?p=227:1:12047078745989:

  I will explain further if you think you want it...  Use any value for a connection. Enter a number in N1 and click in the field of N2, the display option takes the sum of the two numbers when you let one of the fields...

  Thank you

  Tony Miller
  Software LuvMuffin
  Ruckersville, WILL

• Rownum giving the Incorrect result in 11 GR 2, but works well in 10 gr 2

  Hi all
  
  We have following query that works well in 10g but in 11g is showing incorrect result.
  
  Select x.*, rownum from (select rat.rating_agency_id rat bus_ca_cpty_rating, STD MST_CP_RATING
  where rat.org_id = 618
  and
  rat.rating_agency_id = MST.rating_agency_id
  and
  rat.rating_value = MST.rating_value
  and
  rat.heritage_system = MST.heritage_system
  rat.rating_date order, rat.rating_time) x
  where rownum = 1;
  
  
  Result without the last control < where rownum = 1 > in the request (for 10g and 11g)
  RATING_AGENCY_ID ROWNUM
  1 of 3
  1 2
  
  Result of the query in 11 GR 2 (11.2.0.3)
  RATING_AGENCY_ID ROWNUM
  1 1
  
  Result of the query in 10 gr 2 (10.2.0.3)
  RATING_AGENCY_ID ROWNUM
  1 of 3
  
  Ask for your help to solve the problem (please tell me the name of bug if it's a bug) and please let me know how the request for 11g is treated.
  
  Published by: 906061 on June 19, 2012 02:22

  What's rat.rating_date, rat.rating_time for these lines.

  Are - this same...
  If they are same oracle does not guarantee which line will be the first to find the rownum = 1, unless you specify another attribute in the order by clause.

• Why can I get two different results from the same coefficients?

  I get two different results of the evaluation of the polynomial function.

  For the first, I get the coefficients of a polynomial function to adapt.  I feed the coefficients of the function made the function Eval Poly and get the correct 12.8582 result when I evaluate 49940.

  For the second, I create constant array of values that have been returned by the polynomial Fit function (I typed in).  However, I get an incorrect result of - 120.7913 when I feed the constant table the function Eval Poly when I evauate 49940.

  How this can happen when I use the same values in table?

  A picture of what I explained is attached.

  Hi Altran,

  are you sure about using the 'same '?

  You compare them? Do you have (at least) set them to 17 digits display properties?

  Please attach a VI instead of an image...

• Toshiba satellite running Vista. The file is possibly corrupted. The file header checksum does not match the checksum calculated

  Toshiba satellite running Vista. The file is possibly corrupted. The file header checksum does not match the checksum calculated. Tried all posisible boots and no joy, continues to turn it back on! Frustration...

  Hey James,.

  I does no change, I didn't download a document from my email (from a sender of confidence). I tried to start in safe mode, just, it restarts and goes back to the corrupted checksum display... Last known good config was the same result! The only error message is one that is in the title of this post, not others. Another detail, that I forgot to add is that it does not get insofar as a logo windows before it fails, just the toshiba start screen, then either passes the corrupt message checksum or a blue screen and restarts before I can read the text on the blue screen. Thanks for your response! Any additional help would be excellent if you can. In the meantime, I'll try your methods. Thanks again
  OK, I have now managed a Startup Repair trying over and over again. Restore all settings and now looks very good, thanks for your help!

• Error: "the file is maybe damaged. the file header does not match the checksum calculated"during the installation of Windows 7/8

  * Original title: Question of re-Installation of operating system.

  I got the message during win 7 / Win 8 installation.

  "the file is maybe damaged. the file header does not match the checksum calculated.

  My config - processor Intel C2D, 2 GB of RAM, Intel motherboard, 500 GB HARD drive

  I have also replace Win 7 DVD and DVD player also replaced.

  I also reinstall my single RAM chip so many times. but the problem still exists.

  During Win XP SP 3 installation, no such message type not displayed. I can install it easily.

  Pls help me Sir, I would like to Win7 in my computer again.

  Hello

  Thanks for posting your query on the Microsoft Community.

  According to the description of the problem, it seems that you are facing the question with the reinstallation of Windows 7 on your computer.

  Because the computer does not recognize the CD - R into the DVD player probably boot order is set to hard drive first. I suggest to change the DVD boot priority in the BIOS and then try to perform the Startup Repair.

  Note: BIOS change / semiconductor (CMOS) to complementary metal oxide settings can cause serious problems that may prevent your computer from starting properly. Microsoft cannot guarantee that problems resulting from the configuration of the BIOS/CMOS settings can be solved. Changes to settings are at your own risk.

  In order to make changes in the BIOS, I suggest you to contact the manufacturer of the computer.

  Method 1:

  Unplug all external devices connected to the computer with the exception of the keyboard and mouse and check if the problem persists.

  M odes 2:

  If the problem persists try the Startup Repair. It is one of the recovery tools in the System Recovery Options menu. This set of tools is on your computer's hard disk and on the Windows installation disc. To learn more about Startup Repair , you can refer to the below mentioned article:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/Startup-Repair-frequently-asked-questions

  Method 3:

  In addition, if startup repair is not enough, you can perform a system restore, check if it helps you to solve the problem. For reference, you can see the article mentioned below.

  What are the system recovery options in Windows 7?

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/what-are-the-system-recovery-options-in-Windows-7

  Note: when you perform the system restore to restore the computer to a previous state, programs and updates that you have installed are removed.

  Hope it would help. If problem persists always post back with the current state of your computer and the result of the proposed suggestion, we will be happy to help you.

  Kind regards

• The results in the debugger do not correspond with the result in the xml output is spent OPA

  
  Hello

  I use the OPM Version 10.4.6. I am facing a problem where I have a result field which is calculated by OPM in session of the debugger gives the correct result. While the same field has a different value in the output xml file passed from OPA to another system. Please give some advice on above question.

  Kind regards

  Mounia

  Sorry, I did not respond earlier. Do you have a support call opened in this regard, otherwise there is someone who has a very similar problem.

  I answered internally on this and the problem seems to be that of mathematical accuracy and very low values, which are then compared with zero. The debugger uses a .net implementation that can give slightly different numerical values at the extremes. I think that your rules would benefit from a degree of rounding applied before you test for equality with anything. Note the type of value that I've seen is 4-16

  I have provided more information to Schneider, who also provided a (Simplified) modules and some sample data.

  The debugger uses essentially the same engine of determinations and in general, you will see exactly the same result except that you've discovered to some extremely small numbers. In your case even if the value is 4-16 in the debugger and 0 in the API (or vice versa) the effect that has on the logic is that a single value is zero, so that the other does not which translates an extra 1000 added and results of 1000 and 2000 respectively.

  Concerning

  Ian

• Adobe Captivate 7 - is the review of the results of the quiz based on the types of questions?

  Adobe Captivate 7 provides the function that you can review the questions, and you can see which of them have answered correctly and that one of them has responded incorrectly. In my e-learning project, there is an exercise that consists of multiple choice questions and drag and drop tasks. This question / task landslides are among the content slides, this means for example after 5 content slides are a 2 slides, it issues then 3 content slides and slide 1 question and so on. The results of all the types of questions - multiple choice questions, drag and drop - are included in the results of the quiz. At the end of the e-learning the 'quiz' results slide comes with the button "check Quiz." I tested this function after exporting the e-learning of Adobe Captivate7. I noticed the following: If you click on the button "check Quiz" the learner back to all the question slides he or she responded. For that on question slides were automatically placed the buttons 'next' and 'back' and the 'inspection' on the ground it is written what the learner has responded to the two first questions are multiple choice questions. There, it works fine the two buttons will appear. After clicking on the button 'next' on the first question slide that contains a multiple choice question, the learner is the second slide of the question, which also contains a multiple choice question. The third issue is a task of drag / move. He do not appear the buttons so the quiz review stops and there is no field 'inspection '.
  
  How do I review the quiz works correctly despite types of questions?

  You will need to create the buttons that you want the slide D & D and format them to look like buttons on the other Quiz slides. Then hide them by deselecting "Visible output" in the properties panel.

  For these D & D slides, you will need a conditional action advanced or shared to be triggered on enter. The action will check the value of the system variable cpInReviewMode, which is a Boolean with the value of 1 by Captivate when you're in playback mode. If its value is in fact = 1 show you the hidden buttons. If you group these buttons, you will need only a single command:

  IF cpInReviewMode is equal to 1

  See the Gr_Buttons

  Continue

  ON THE OTHER

  Continue

• IR: result of the aggregation in footer of report

  Hello!

  This quote from 'beginning Oracle Application Express 4.2' at page 174 (on the aggregation to IR):

  "The results are displayed at the end of the report."

  There is a simple method to print the results of the aggregation for the report footer on each page?

  I asked - and I said

  To do what I create processes on demand for the results of the calculations of aggregation (via APEX_IR_PKG) and make ajax request to him in the event "discount for after ' IR

  There is the manual detailed with the sample http://devsonia.ru/2013/11/14/oracle-apex-aggregation-in-interactive-report-on-each-page-en/.

• Is it possible to use formulas (for example 'if' or VLOOKUP functions) in the "custom calculation Script?

  I'm working on a PDF form fill converted from MS excel. It is for others to use who do not have MS excel required to use my spreadsheet.

  1. I would like to know, how can we have complex formulas being the custom tab calculation script calculate under properties in a menu of cell?

  2. where can I find it that the formulas will work in the calculation script custom as well as the format of these formulas work properly (tutorials would help)?

  I tried to write an 'if' function but I get and error so I guess that is functions do not work in the script, or there is a different format of spreadsheet standard formats.

  Bruce

  .

  In this case the loop would be:

  for (var i = 0; i)< 8;="" i="" +="1)">

  sum += + getField("Total."_+_i).value;

  }

  So initially, the counter i is zero, so the domain name used with the getField method is:

  'Total': + 0, which results in the string "Total.0". At each iteration, the variable i is incremented by 1, so the following field names are the following:

  "Total.1".

  "Total.2".

  'Total.3 '.

  'Total.4 '.

  'Total.5 '.

  'Total.6 '.

  "World.7.

  The script gets the value of each field, it converts numbers and adds the number to the cumulation.

• Do not display 0.0% as a response to the field calculated

  My field is formatted to % and one decimal place and it show 0.0%.  I would have preferred that it be blank until the two fields are filled, that produce the answer.  I tried to do that with the following calculation and it works until I changed the format of percentage.

  var v1 = + getField("Tons_UsedRow1").value;

  var v2 = + getField("Tons_RequiredRow1").value;

  If (v1! == 0 & & v2! == 0) {}

  var result =(v1 / v2);

  Event.Value = result;

  } else {event.value = ";}}

  Only a digital format of field with currency symbol or percentage symbol and view a null value.

  You use the built-in formatting to Acrobat JS functions to set the field size according to need.

  I would start by the field formatted to 'None '.

  The user you custom calculation script.

  Add custom validation script:

  nDec var = 1; set the number of decimal places; number & percent;

  var sepStyle = 0; style of thousands separator; number & percent;

  var negStyle = 0; negative style; number only;

  var currStyle =""; always null; number only;

  var strCurrency = ""; currency symbol; number only;

  var bCurrencyPrepend = false; prefix of currency; number only;

  var bPercentPrepend = false; percentage of prefix; percent only;

  If (event.value == 0 | event.value == "") {}

  Event.Value = "";

  AFNumber_Format (nDec, sepStyle, negStyle, currStyle, strCurrency, bCurrencyPrepend);

  } else {}

  AFPercent_Format (nDec, sepStyle, bPercentPrepend);

  }