Reusing the validation rule

Gurus,

We have a requirement in our project, where we need rules of reusable validatoin. Is there a way?

Thank you

Hello

Yes it is. You must create a custom validation rule.

To do this, select your project template and invoke the New Gallery.

File-> new-> ADF business components-> Valdiation rule.

Enter a name for your java class, and then click ok.

In your class validateValue method, you can enter validation rules. Assume that you use the Tables Emp and you must validate if Ename is equal to "xyz".

Then in the value of validate method:

 public boolean validateValue(Object value) {

        EntityImpl emp = (EntityImpl)value;
        if(emp.getAttribute("ename").toString().equals("xyz")){
            return true;
        }
        return false;
    }

If you need a custom error message, you can:

    public void validate(JboValidatorContext ctx) {
        if (!validateValue(ctx.getNewValue())) {
            throw new ValidationException("project1.ValidationRuleImpl1 validation failed");
        }
    }

Save your validation rule in the IDE:

1. create an ADF library Jar out of your project file.
2 deploy the library.
3 call - tools-> preferences-> business components-> save the rules-> Pick library-> select your library that you have deployed and give it a name.

Now whenever you call the rule validtion in flat EO Editor, dialog box you will see the rule below all of the other rules. It will be available in any project.

Thank you.

Tags: Java

Similar Questions

  • Cannot search the Dimension members in the Validation rules editor

    Dear all,

    I installed FDM + Foundation + HFM + Essbase + planning 11.1.1.3
    I stacked with the following problem:
    When I try to get the dimension members in the validation rules editor,
    I am - Web page message * 'data for this dimension not found' *
    I can't select the members here, I selected in activities-> map
    Can someone help me look for my existing members?

    Best regards
    Siarhei

    Hello

    Are you sure that you associate dimensions "VALxxxxx" in the workbench to your valid dimensions within Essbase?
    VAL dimensions are down at the bottom of the list of dimension for the adapter Essbase... and ValEntity, ValAccount, etc.

    Thank you

  • Validation rule is not suitable for the calculated figure

    Hello

    I want to add a validation rule in my data form. My requirement is in the form of data, I want the value of line 2 should be greater than (value of line 1 * 0.2).
    Now when I am trying to solve this problem through validation rule I do not find these conditions that are consistent with this case. Is there a way to get out of this scenario in order of validation?

    Thanks in advance.

    Hello. So you have at least two segments in your dataform (line1, line2)
    As we cannot make math operators with cell values in the validation rules, it seems that you must create formulas row3 (with the hide option)
    It's very simple, as follows: [1] * 0.2
    And then, you can create your validataion rule:
    Value of the row IF 2<= row="" value="">
    Then the cells of process...

    You can also include additional conditions for missing values in lines 1, 2, as appropriate

  • How to add validation rules - do not have access to data tools

    Hello

    I would like to add a validation rule so that when import us data from Salesforce to Eloqua we provide are mobile phone numbers in the international format, in order to send SMS messages.  Oracle Help was given instructions to do this ()http://docs.oracle.com/cloud/latest/marketingcs_gs/OMCAA/index.html#Help/DataTools/DataTools.htm) but, it requires access to the "Information Tools" and pay more money.  Is there a way I can add a validation to otherwise rule?  Maybe using program Builder?


    Any help is very appreciated as always!


    Alex

    Hello

    You can use the "validation rule" in the shared list. Here you can apply the validation rule.

    Kind regards

    Eloqua expert

  • FDM Validation rules

    I wrote a validation rule FDM for the audit report. I want to check the value of assets - shares - commitment. As I wrote this code, the report seems good too long that the result of this calculation is not zero. But if the result is zero, the line is marked as ERROR. Any ideas on how to avoid it?

    This is the logic of the rule that we use:

    fun:

    Dim dblVal

    dblVal = ABS (|, YourAssetAcctHere, [high PEAK], Allcustom1, Allcustom2, Allcustom3, AllCustom4L, |-|, YourLiabilityandEquityAccountHere, [high PEAK], Allcustom1, Allcustom2, Allcustom3, Allcustom4L, |)

    If dblVal< 5="">
    "Past the validation rule.
    RESULT = True

    ElseIf dblVal > = 5 and dblVal<= 10="">
    ' Pass the Validation, emits warning
    RESULT = True
    RES. PstrCheckMessage1 = "WARNING!" Trial balance is unbalanced.

    ElseIf dblVal > 10 then
    ' Validation failed
    RESULT = False
    RES. PstrCheckMessage1 = "Trial Balance is out of balance, please correct!

    End If

  • TO Check - Validation rules

    If I want to write code for the control of TB is balanced, where I usually would do it? What is in the rules of validation or scripts?

    I tried to write a validation rule, declaring that "assets - shares - passive = 0 ' and I want to see the value of this calculation in the audit report. But I couldn't have this value in the audit report. Although in the audit report, I could see that the rule status fails. But the value column does not show the actual result. Someone knows how to display column value with the result of the calculation and always show status as if failure ' assets - shares - responsibility <>0.

    Hello

    This can be done in two ways...

    Using Script to validate the After/Before you can write a script to check the zero balance...
    and if the balance is not equal to zero then you can push the workflow in the previous step so that the wrong data may not be exported.

    For the Validation controls:
    According to your requirement.
    In the validation rules, go to the rule
    And in the tab-> display section rule... type: assets - shares - responsibility

    Then test rule and tick display test... it will show the difference in value.

    Then run the audit report show amount to test the display in the value column

    If your query is answered then
    Please mark as answer/useful

    J

  • Export to spreadsheet does not show the formatting data Validation rules

    Currently in Hyperion Planning 11.1.2.3, have basic color formatting based on Data Validation rules. However, when you use the option export to a worksheet, the Formatting disappears.

    Understand the connection to Hyperion planning is kept only on Smart View, if she will not apply export on the worksheet?

    Thank you

    Mauricette

    I think that the formatting will be lost during the selection of the option export spreadsheet because it is about a raw format, if you want to format would be preferable to use the Smart View method.

    See you soon

    John

    http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • Get the current language settings in the Custom Validation rule?

    Hello

    I read the book from Guide JDevelopers
    "In 26.9' custom application Validation rules.
    I ran the example to create custom Validation rules
    I ran my validation rule for English and Italian language using 'Message Bundles'
    I had EntityImplMsgBundle and EntityImplMsgBundle_it for the Italian language
    The Question is:
    Is it possible to get the current settings of the language used "get of in my custom validation class?
    I need to know if the current language is 'in' or 'it '.

    When I test my Applicaton of Module I can choose the configuration name: English EntityLocal and EntityLocalIT for the Italian language
    Can I access this validation custome bean?

    Kind regards.

    Hello

    Yes, you can access the local current in your validation rule by accessing the current session through the source of the entity object DBTransaction object. This is done by calling:

    ((EntityImpl)valCtx.getSource()).getDBTransaction().getSession().getLocale()

    HTH,
    Patrik

  • How can I set an at the entity level validation rule

    Hi all
    I have a table that contains CompanyId DepartmentId, PostionId and PositionCode etc.
    I have to create a form to add new Postions in companies and departments.
    And I have to fix a contrint at the level of the entity such as group two number of records in this table have the same companyId and PostionCode information
    That's a companyId should not any document which is to have several codes Postion. Always the CompanyId PostionId combinaisondes must be unique.
    So I set a constraint in the entity level, I think that Yes...
    Please help with this problem...

    Thank you and best regards,
    Ranjith C

    create a key to spare for the CompanyId and PositionCode information...
    Have the validation of the key unique to the entity level...
    http://www.gabrielsideras.com/2010/09/28/ADF-unique-key-validation/
    http://andrejusb.blogspot.com/2011/07/unique-key-validation-for-lov-based-on.html

  • Then the validation of a detail or form based on the date picker - upper effective Date?

    Hi, creates a BP custom with the effective date in field added to my details form or higher. Can I have a set of validation rules up for my top of or the form detailed such as the effective date cannot be greater than the current date? Thanks in advance.

    For the decimal amount, you need to change the formula type, the default value is a numerical formula, but you must choose the date difference. This is the online help:

    To create a date-difference formula

    1. Open the form that contains the field for which you want to create a formula. The form designer window opens.
    2. In the form designer window, select the date field that you want to create the formula. When the calculation is performed, this field appears as read-only on the form and will automatically update each time that the fields that make up the formula change.
    3. Click the formula button. A creation of the formula window opens.
    4. In the formula field Type, choose the difference in Date in the list. The window expands to show additional fields, as shown in the table below.
    5. Click OK to save your changes and close the window.

    In this area:

    Follow these steps:

    Last Date

    Click on the arrow down. uDesigner displays the list of all numeric fields on the form. In this list, choose the field that contains the later of the two dates that will be used in the calculation.

    Earliest date

    Click on the arrow down. In this list, choose the field that contains the first of the two dates that will be used in the calculation.

    Calculations based on

    Choose the calendar days to include all days of the week in the calculation. Choose the days of work to use only the working days of the week in the calculation.

  • Error messages for cross validation rules does not properly

    We have implemented two rules of cross validation for our table GL accounts flexfield combinations.  We had implemented the first rule, and it was working properly and displays the error message associated with the rule.  When we added a second rule with a different error message, the application correctly applied the rule, however, now when a new combination of COA violates the first rule, the error message that is displayed is the second rule we created.  How can we get the error messages to be displayed for the correct error?

    Matt

    Yes, if you say that when the 3 segment is actually "OPEX", then it seems to me that the Include and Exclude are simply reversed for what you describe as the needs of the company. When you make a rule, the simplest way to define this term is usually with a universal Include statement (that is to say, we want that all combinations of account), then from there to make a statement that says Yes all except these (the exclude statement).

    Aware in Opex Department will exercise a universal declaration currently, which means that all of these accounts are not allowed (again, except if 7-9 segments have something else of zeros, while they may be permitted).

    If your site back how intervals are defined between the Include and Exclude in the Department and Opex, once registered, you can see if this gives now what you are looking for. If segment 3 is supposed to have a range rather than the value "OPEX", then the exclusion may need further tweaking and we can discuss that further if you wish. With the way in which it will be set to this change, it will not allow a segment 2 to 00000 if the Segment 3 is "OPEX" during a new combination.

    Please mark answers 'Proper' or 'Useful', as appropriate, to facilitate solutions to the other participants of the RTO.

  • Smarlist and validation rule

    Hello

    I have a member named "is it a project": who has a smarlist attached to what ""Yes "or" NO": If Yes: we want users to enter the amount in dollars and if it didn't it must be left blank." "" However, there are some users who always enter numbers even if it not a project. Is that what I can do to restrict them to enter data if they choose No..

    I tried with validation rules, but I can only change the color of the cell. but not prevent them from entering.

    Thank you.

    Data validation cannot prevent users enter or data backup.  It can be used to prevent users from data in the promotion approval process.

    You could write a business rule that withdrew their data based on the value of the smart list, however I generally hesitate to write rules that delete data in this way, as it tends to surprise users.

    Hope this helps,

    -Jake

  • Validation rule of error to a value greater than $999,999,999,999.99.

    A validation rule of error for an input value of the user of something higher to $999,999,999,999.99 seems to work only when the amount is 1,000,000,000,100.00 in Oracle policy Automation when written as a Word document rule.

    If the value is implemented at the level of the attribute, then it works for the maximum value of $999,999,999,999.99. And immediately places an error for any value greater than $999,999,999,999.99 even a value of $1,000,000,000,000 is picked up. However, it will be against best practices which is the mixture of source and validation rules.

    I tried all kinds of conditions such as rounding, truncation etc and none seem to work correctly outside validation of the attribute levels.

    @

    Looks like you have to face a maximum value for the validation.

    Do you really need set a very high maximum value? I suggest you enter a maximum value that is a little less than 999,999,999,999.99

    See you soon

    Frank

  • Table - jump on existing records Validation rules

    Hi all

    JDeveloper version: 12 c stack-(je l'espère, le comportement doit être le même en 11g ainsi)

    I created an af:table of editable records in them. And there is a Date beginning with minValue set to the current date (the value is read in backing bean)

    < af:inputDate value = "#{bindings." StartDate.inputValue}"required =" #{bindings. " StartDate.hints.mandatory}.

    columns = "#{bindings." StartDate.hints.displayWidth}.

    shortDesc = "#{bindings." StartDate.hints.tooltip}"id ="id1 ".

    minValue = "#{pageFlowScope.BackingBean.currentSysDate}" > "

    Example:

    Name Value Start date End date
    Parameter 11003/10/199906/10/2050
    Parameter 22005/10/201406/10/2050

    Parameter 1 is an old drive

    Parameter 2 is a new record

    Problem:

    When you submit the changes with the confirmation key that ADF trying to validate the parameter 1 and 2 setting for the Start Date.

    And it seems to happen in the java script on the client side.

    I was expecting that it would be only to validate new records, or modified records.

    Question:

    Is there a way I can force the ADF to the validation only on the changed lines and new lines?

    Thank you

    SAPP

    It looks like a the only option is to leave the MinValue feature in calendar component and implement validation on the server side.

    I prefer to do this validation as part of the validation from EntityObject as this coding in doDML() rules

  • Application process, do not run after the validation error

    Hi all.

    APEX 4.1
    XE 11 GR 2
    WIN7
    Firexfox

    I have a page where I add additional javascript code to a page by using htp.p in a process of application "before the footer. It works fine as long as there is no validation error. When the validation fails (for example a UK-check with the location of the error value "Inline notification"), the page is re-fondue, but the application process is not running and so my extra code is missing from the page.

    Is this intended behavior or am I doing something wrond?

    Andreas

    Addition:

    I tried the sam using a 'local' page process, but these do not seem to fire.

    Published by: Andreas Weiden on 22.12.2011 21:31

    Andreas Weiden says:

    Is this intended behavior or am I doing something wrond?

    This is the expected behavior. Generally, the process and calculations source item, the actions are not executed when the page is re-made after validation errors. They also provide great potential for confusion of side effects (for example reset to a default value for an item that had an invalid value sent).

    However, the engine provides a special treatment for the process with the built-in Inline Validation errors displayed condition so that they will be run when a page is rendered with validation errors. See + {: identifier of the thread = 493070} + for an interesting discussion on this topic.

    An alternative (and in my opinion a more classic and rather more clear) would be to generate the JS in a dynamic region of PL/SQL code on the Page zero. Always reuse the code on all or several pages, but is more clearly part of the rendering of the page as an application process and does not rely on a very obscure condition, being the only way you can make it work.

Maybe you are looking for