Smarlist and validation rule

Hello

I have a member named "is it a project": who has a smarlist attached to what ""Yes "or" NO": If Yes: we want users to enter the amount in dollars and if it didn't it must be left blank." "" However, there are some users who always enter numbers even if it not a project. Is that what I can do to restrict them to enter data if they choose No..

I tried with validation rules, but I can only change the color of the cell. but not prevent them from entering.

Thank you.

Data validation cannot prevent users enter or data backup.  It can be used to prevent users from data in the promotion approval process.

You could write a business rule that withdrew their data based on the value of the smart list, however I generally hesitate to write rules that delete data in this way, as it tends to surprise users.

Hope this helps,

-Jake

Tags: Business Intelligence

Similar Questions

  • Collections (gtype 4) geometry and validation rules

    Hi people,

    I'm not anywhere special rules about the way a geometry collection must validate. What is the best reference (even outside of Oracle Spatial)?
    Below is a geometry collection to a single point and three polygons (with some overlap). When I delete the point and to test the three polygons as a MultiPolygon I get an error 13351 as expected. But when wrapped in a collection I get return TRUE. Is there really no rules for collections? Or something is wrong?

    In this case, the collection is the data from the source, but then I go out the polygons further up the road and - wow - invalid geometries.
    I see the same results on the gr 10, 2 and 11 GR 2.

    Thank you!

    Paul

    Geometry of the collection to a point with three polygons overlapping - valid TRUE
    SELECT
SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(
   SDO_GEOMETRY(
      2004,
      8265,
      NULL,
      SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(
         1,
         1,
         1,
         3,
         1003,
         1,
         13,
         1003,
         1,
         23,
         1003,
         1
      ),
      SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(
         -84.3508498737178,
         45.9775103765449,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522938852715,
         45.9722956030474,
         -84.3522161977673,
         45.9722308634606,
         -84.3522032498499,
         45.9722697072127,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522938852715,
         45.9722956030474,
         -84.3522161977673,
         45.9722308634606,
         -84.3522032498499,
         45.9722697072127,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522938852715,
         45.9722956030474,
         -84.3522161977673,
         45.9722308634606,
         -84.3522032498499,
         45.9722697072127,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168
      )
   ),
   0.001
)
FROM
dual
    Removed point making 2007, now throw error 13351
    SELECT
SDO_GEOM.VALIDATE_GEOMETRY_WITH_CONTEXT(
   SDO_GEOMETRY(
      2007,
      8265,
      NULL,
      SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(
         1,
         1003,
         1,
         11,
         1003,
         1,
         21,
         1003,
         1
      ),
      SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522938852715,
         45.9722956030474,
         -84.3522161977673,
         45.9722308634606,
         -84.3522032498499,
         45.9722697072127,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522938852715,
         45.9722956030474,
         -84.3522161977673,
         45.9722308634606,
         -84.3522032498499,
         45.9722697072127,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168,
         -84.3522938852715,
         45.9722956030474,
         -84.3522161977673,
         45.9722308634606,
         -84.3522032498499,
         45.9722697072127,
         -84.3522809373541,
         45.9723473947168
      )
   ),
   0.001
)
FROM
dual

    Hi, -.
    We don't validation for each of the children of the geometry of the COLLECTION.
    In other words, we donot make any cross element of validation for the children of the geometry of gtype COLLECTION.
    I hope this helps.
    Thank you
    Baris

  • Validation rule of error to a value greater than $999,999,999,999.99.

    A validation rule of error for an input value of the user of something higher to $999,999,999,999.99 seems to work only when the amount is 1,000,000,000,100.00 in Oracle policy Automation when written as a Word document rule.

    If the value is implemented at the level of the attribute, then it works for the maximum value of $999,999,999,999.99. And immediately places an error for any value greater than $999,999,999,999.99 even a value of $1,000,000,000,000 is picked up. However, it will be against best practices which is the mixture of source and validation rules.

    I tried all kinds of conditions such as rounding, truncation etc and none seem to work correctly outside validation of the attribute levels.

    @

    Looks like you have to face a maximum value for the validation.

    Do you really need set a very high maximum value? I suggest you enter a maximum value that is a little less than 999,999,999,999.99

    See you soon

    Frank

  • OPM quality specification API and API rules of validity

    Hello

    I wanted to create a specification of quality and its rules of validity to the underside of the API Help, did someone could provide examples of scripts for the same, I would really appreciate your help on this?

    gmd_spec_pub. CREATE_SPEC

    gmd_spec_vrs_pub. CREATE_WIP_SPEC_VRS

    gmd_spec_vrs_pub. CREATE_INVENTORY_SPEC_VRS

    gmd_spec_vrs_pub. CREATE_CUSTOMER_SPEC_VRS

    gmd_spec_vrs_pub. CREATE_SUPPLIER_SPEC_VRS

    Thank you

    RAM

    l_gmd_spec_tbl: = NULL;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.spec_id: = NULL;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.spec_name: = spec_rec.spec_name;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.spec_vers: = spec_rec.spec_vers;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.spec_desc: = spec_rec.spec_desc;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.inventory_item_id: = spec_rec.inventory_item_id;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl. Review: = NULL;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.grade_code: = NULL;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.spec_status: = gn_status;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.owner_organization_id: = spec_rec.organization_id;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.owner_id: = l_user_id;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.sample_inv_trans_ind: = NULL;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.delete_mark: = 0;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.text_code: = NULL;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl. CREATION_DATE: = gd_sysdate;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.created_by: = l_user_id;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.last_updated_by: = l_user_id;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.last_update_date: = gd_sysdate;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.last_update_login: = l_user_id;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.spec_type: = 'I ';                     -lc_spec_type;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.overlay_ind: = NULL;

    l_gmd_spec_tbl.base_spec_id: = NULL;

    l_spec_tests_tbl: = NULL;

    l_count: = 1;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .spec_id: = NULL;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .test_id: = l_test_id;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .test_method_id: = l_test_method_id;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .seq: = l_seq;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .test_qty: = l_qty;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .test_qty_uom: = l_uom;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .min_value_num: = l_min_value_num;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .target_value_num: = l_target;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .max_value_num: = l_max_value_num;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .min_value_char: = null;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .target_value_char: = null;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .max_value_char: = null;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .test_replicate: = 1;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .check_result_interval: = 1;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .display_precision: = l_display_precision;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .report_precision: = l_report_precision;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .test_priority: = NULL;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .optional_ind: = Upper (substr (spec_test_rec.optional_ind, 1, 1));

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .retest_lot_expiry_ind: = Upper (substr (spec_test_rec.retest_lot_expiry_ind, 1, 1));

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .test_display: = spec_test_rec.target_desc;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .viability_duration: = 0;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .creation_date: = gd_sysdate;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .created_by: = l_user_id;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .last_updated_by: = l_user_id;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .last_update_date: = gd_sysdate;

    l_spec_tests_tbl (ln_count) .last_update_login: = l_user_id;

    BEGIN

    Apps.gmd_spec_pub.create_spec

    (p_api_version-online 2.0

    p_init_msg_list-online apps.fnd_api.g_true

    p_commit-online apps.fnd_api.g_false

    p_validation_level-online apps.fnd_api.g_valid_level_full

    p_spec-online l_gmd_spec_tbl

    p_spec_tests_tbl-online l_spec_tests_tbl

    p_user_name-online l_user_name

    x_spec-online x_gmd_spec_tbl

    x_spec_tests_tbl-online x_spec_tests_tbl

    x_return_status-online l_return_status

    x_msg_count-online l_msg_count

    x_msg_data-online l_msg_data

    );

    ' IF l_return_status <> s ' THEN

    l_msg: = ";

    BECAUSE me in 1... l_msg_count LOOP

    l_msg: = SUBSTR(l_msg ||) ' | ' || SUBSTR (apps.fnd_msg_pub.get (l_msg_count - i + 1, 'F'), 0, 200), 1, 2000);

    END LOOP;

    l_msg_data: = l_msg;

    Apps.fnd_file.put_line (apps.fnd_file. JOURNAL,'TRACK 13.4 data :'|| l_msg_data);

    END IF;

    EXCEPTION

    WHILE OTHERS

    THEN

    Apps.fnd_file.put_line (apps.fnd_file. JOURNAL,'API HAS RAISED THE ERROR: ' | SQLCODE. '-'|| SQLERRM);

    Apps.fnd_file.put_line (apps.fnd_file. NEWSPAPER, "FOLLOW 13.6" | "» l_return_status);

    END;

    l_count: = 1;

    l_inventory_spec_vrs_tbl (l_count) .spec_vr_id: = NULL;

    l_inventory_spec_vrs_tbl (l_count) .spec_id: = ln_spec_id;

    l_inventory_spec_vrs_tbl (l_count) .orgn_code: = 'PR1 ';

    l_inventory_spec_vrs_tbl (l_count) .spec_vr_status: = 100;

    l_inventory_spec_vrs_tbl (l_count) .start_date: = gd_sysdate;

    "l_inventory_spec_vrs_tbl (l_count) .end_date: = December 31, 2014;

    l_inventory_spec_vrs_tbl (l_count) .creation_date: = gd_sysdate;

    l_inventory_spec_vrs_tbl (l_count) .created_by: = l_user_id;

    l_inventory_spec_vrs_tbl (l_count) .last_updated_by: = l_user_id;

    l_inventory_spec_vrs_tbl (l_count) .last_update_date: = gd_sysdate;

    l_inventory_spec_vrs_tbl (l_count) .last_update_login: = l_user_id;

    l_inventory_spec_vrs_tbl (l_count) .organization_id: = ln_organization_id;

    BEGIN

    Apps.gmd_spec_vrs_pub.create_inventory_spec_vrs

    (p_api_version => ' 1.0' ")

    , p_init_msg_list-online 'F'

    , p_commit-online 'F'

    p_validation_level-online apps.fnd_api.g_valid_level_full

    p_inventory_spec_vrs_tbl-online l_inventory_spec_vrs_tbl

    p_user_name-online l_user_name

    x_inventory_spec_vrs_tbl-online l_inventory_spec_vrs_out_tbl

    x_return_status-online l_return_status

    x_msg_count-online l_msg_count

    x_msg_data-online l_msg_data

    );

    ' IF l_return_status <> s ' THEN

    BECAUSE me in 1... l_msg_count LOOP

    Apps.fnd_msg_pub.get (p_msg_index-online i

    , p_encoded-online 'F'

    p_data-online l_msg_data

    p_msg_index_out-online l_msg_ind

    );

    END LOOP;

    END IF;

    EXCEPTION

    WHILE OTHERS

    THEN

    Apps.fnd_file.put_line (apps.fnd_file. JOURNAL,'API HAS RAISED THE ERROR: ' | SQLCODE. '-'|| SQLERRM);

    END;

  • Validation rule to exclude a role and a channel

    I'm trying to get a job of validation rule that will make a commit on a date so that the dates of 3 days in the past to the current date are okay. It is not allowed to any backdating by more than 3 days or future meetings. I also need to exclude the role of the administrator and Web Services channel. I can't make it work.

    Here is what I have that doesn't seem to work:
    = (today) - AND 3 < = today() AND <>'Administrator' of the UserValue ('< role >') AND ExcludeChannel ("Web Services")
    I also tried to use UserValue ("< Alias >"), since both of the above have an Alias - this approach does not work either.

    Any assistance with this formatting Validation rule will be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you
    Charley

    The first formula below will manage the role and the logic of date. I tested it and it works. You will need to add the part of the canal.

    IIf (UserValue ("< role > '") = "Administrator", [< EstimatedCloseDate >], IIf ([< EstimatedCloseDate >] > today () - 3 AND [< EstimatedCloseDate >] < = today(), [< EstimatedCloseDate >], "Invalid"))

    I do not have a partner app so I can't test the part of the canal of the formula, but the ExcludeChannel() function returns false if the specified channel is the channel that the request came. Since we want to exclude validation of the chain of Web Services, we use the NOT operator to make the IIf statement work the way we wanted. So the second option is my estimate of what you need. You will need to test to validate my assumptions. If the second formula does not work, try it without the NOT operator and reverse the formula.

    IIf (UserValue ("< role > '") = "Administrator", [< EstimatedCloseDate >], IIf (NOT ExcludeChannel ("Web Services"), [< EstimatedCloseDate >], IIf ([< EstimatedCloseDate >] > today () - 3 AND [< EstimatedCloseDate >] < = today(), [< EstimatedCloseDate >], "Invalid")))

    Good luck
    Thom

  • Problem with stored procedure and validation

    I have the following stored procedure:

    create or replace PROCEDURE SOME_PROC)

    /*

    Some settings

    */

    ) AS

    NUMBER of errors

    BEGIN

    errors: = FN_CHECK_BUSINESS_RULE_1 (/ * some args * /);

    if(Errors > 0) then

    raise_application_error (ERR_CONSTANTS. SOME_ERROR_NUMBER, ERR_CONSTANTS. SOME_ERROR_MESSAGE);

    end if;

    INSERT INTO une_table (/ * columns * /) VALUES (/ * values * /);

    END SOME_PROC;

    Because the business rule 1 is placed inside the stored procedure I can't check it out without calling the stored procedure.

    I need to call the stored procedure 10 times with a different set of parameters and validation of the changes only after all calls to the stored procedure

    are successful. I want to show the user all the errors that occurred during the stored procedure calls. If for a first example of stored procedure call

    succeeds and a second failure no data has to be stored in a database.

    How to prevent the stored procedure for insert lines until I call the method commit of ApplicationModule?

    Thanks in advance.

    No, other users only see the lines until you commit. The search term is the transaction isolation level. Tom Kite write a paper on this here ask Tom: on transaction isolation levels. This article gives some samples, according to theory, and you should read it.

    Timo

  • How to add validation rules - do not have access to data tools

    Hello

    I would like to add a validation rule so that when import us data from Salesforce to Eloqua we provide are mobile phone numbers in the international format, in order to send SMS messages.  Oracle Help was given instructions to do this ()http://docs.oracle.com/cloud/latest/marketingcs_gs/OMCAA/index.html#Help/DataTools/DataTools.htm) but, it requires access to the "Information Tools" and pay more money.  Is there a way I can add a validation to otherwise rule?  Maybe using program Builder?


    Any help is very appreciated as always!


    Alex

    Hello

    You can use the "validation rule" in the shared list. Here you can apply the validation rule.

    Kind regards

    Eloqua expert

  • Validation rule is not suitable for the calculated figure

    Hello

    I want to add a validation rule in my data form. My requirement is in the form of data, I want the value of line 2 should be greater than (value of line 1 * 0.2).
    Now when I am trying to solve this problem through validation rule I do not find these conditions that are consistent with this case. Is there a way to get out of this scenario in order of validation?

    Thanks in advance.

    Hello. So you have at least two segments in your dataform (line1, line2)
    As we cannot make math operators with cell values in the validation rules, it seems that you must create formulas row3 (with the hide option)
    It's very simple, as follows: [1] * 0.2
    And then, you can create your validataion rule:
    Value of the row IF 2<= row="" value="">
    Then the cells of process...

    You can also include additional conditions for missing values in lines 1, 2, as appropriate

  • FDM Validation rules

    I wrote a validation rule FDM for the audit report. I want to check the value of assets - shares - commitment. As I wrote this code, the report seems good too long that the result of this calculation is not zero. But if the result is zero, the line is marked as ERROR. Any ideas on how to avoid it?

    This is the logic of the rule that we use:

    fun:

    Dim dblVal

    dblVal = ABS (|, YourAssetAcctHere, [high PEAK], Allcustom1, Allcustom2, Allcustom3, AllCustom4L, |-|, YourLiabilityandEquityAccountHere, [high PEAK], Allcustom1, Allcustom2, Allcustom3, Allcustom4L, |)

    If dblVal< 5="">
    "Past the validation rule.
    RESULT = True

    ElseIf dblVal > = 5 and dblVal<= 10="">
    ' Pass the Validation, emits warning
    RESULT = True
    RES. PstrCheckMessage1 = "WARNING!" Trial balance is unbalanced.

    ElseIf dblVal > 10 then
    ' Validation failed
    RESULT = False
    RES. PstrCheckMessage1 = "Trial Balance is out of balance, please correct!

    End If

  • TO Check - Validation rules

    If I want to write code for the control of TB is balanced, where I usually would do it? What is in the rules of validation or scripts?

    I tried to write a validation rule, declaring that "assets - shares - passive = 0 ' and I want to see the value of this calculation in the audit report. But I couldn't have this value in the audit report. Although in the audit report, I could see that the rule status fails. But the value column does not show the actual result. Someone knows how to display column value with the result of the calculation and always show status as if failure ' assets - shares - responsibility <>0.

    Hello

    This can be done in two ways...

    Using Script to validate the After/Before you can write a script to check the zero balance...
    and if the balance is not equal to zero then you can push the workflow in the previous step so that the wrong data may not be exported.

    For the Validation controls:
    According to your requirement.
    In the validation rules, go to the rule
    And in the tab-> display section rule... type: assets - shares - responsibility

    Then test rule and tick display test... it will show the difference in value.

    Then run the audit report show amount to test the display in the value column

    If your query is answered then
    Please mark as answer/useful

    J

  • Complex "validation rule" using Java Bean code

    Hello

    I've never used with jdeveloper validation rules, but I need a complex validation rule to a column of my table.

    Can I put a 'validation rule' on an attribute of an object of display or on a column in a table, using the Bean code?

    My column must contain different values depending on the other columns in the table, so I think I can't do this without java code...

    I tried to doubleClick on column to create a validator, but I put a 'printing' inside and saw that running many times, but I want to run validation only when the value of the column change!

    How can I do this? What should I use?

    Kind regards
    Trigger

    Trigger,

    If you want to validate an attribute that is dependent on another attribute - you must upgrade the VO (or EO), not at the level of the attribute. You can write a validator method (which is a Java method) to achieve this. I don't think that nini will work for postings that depend on several attributes.

    John

  • Cannot search the Dimension members in the Validation rules editor

    Dear all,

    I installed FDM + Foundation + HFM + Essbase + planning 11.1.1.3
    I stacked with the following problem:
    When I try to get the dimension members in the validation rules editor,
    I am - Web page message * 'data for this dimension not found' *
    I can't select the members here, I selected in activities-> map
    Can someone help me look for my existing members?

    Best regards
    Siarhei

    Hello

    Are you sure that you associate dimensions "VALxxxxx" in the workbench to your valid dimensions within Essbase?
    VAL dimensions are down at the bottom of the list of dimension for the adapter Essbase... and ValEntity, ValAccount, etc.

    Thank you

  • Validation rule

    I wrote a validation rule in the FDM, but even if validation is FALSE data gets loaded into Essbase.

    Kindly help

    You can connect to the SQL or Oracle DATABASE schema that you have created to FDM. Now, you will find tables ("tdataseg" these tables contain data) you'll find the table that contains data you related.
    And no denormalization is required.

    Varun

  • How to set a validation rule on a unique key formed by more than columns

    Hi all
    I use Jdeveloper 11.1.1.2
    I have a table with a column 3: col1, col2, col3. On that note, I have defined a unique key formed by col2 and col3.
    How can I define a validation rule on this key?
    In the entity object, I can't find anything useful, I see only attributes, but not the single key just defined (in the source of the entity object I have the code on the unique key).

    Thank you

    Andrea

    Published by: Andrea9 on February 11, 2010 03:46

    Yes, that's correct.

    You will realize that the approach set out in the Manual:

    (1) has a possibility to create duplicates (that is, you still need the unique key in the DB).

    (2) is slower (requires intermediate to read all values db at the intermediate level)

    You could, as Marie-Ange suggested to write the code as described in the post to blog as well - however, it has the same drawbacks.

    If you really need ID dups before validation, you will have to live with the disadvantages of the approach defined.

    Best,

    John

  • Reusing the validation rule

    Gurus,

    We have a requirement in our project, where we need rules of reusable validatoin. Is there a way?

    Thank you

    Hello

    Yes it is. You must create a custom validation rule.

    To do this, select your project template and invoke the New Gallery.

    File-> new-> ADF business components-> Valdiation rule.

    Enter a name for your java class, and then click ok.

    In your class validateValue method, you can enter validation rules. Assume that you use the Tables Emp and you must validate if Ename is equal to "xyz".

    Then in the value of validate method:

     public boolean validateValue(Object value) {

        EntityImpl emp = (EntityImpl)value;
        if(emp.getAttribute("ename").toString().equals("xyz")){
            return true;
        }
        return false;
    }

    If you need a custom error message, you can:

        public void validate(JboValidatorContext ctx) {
        if (!validateValue(ctx.getNewValue())) {
            throw new ValidationException("project1.ValidationRuleImpl1 validation failed");
        }
    }

    Save your validation rule in the IDE:

    1. create an ADF library Jar out of your project file.
    2 deploy the library.
    3 call - tools-> preferences-> business components-> save the rules-> Pick library-> select your library that you have deployed and give it a name.

    Now whenever you call the rule validtion in flat EO Editor, dialog box you will see the rule below all of the other rules. It will be available in any project.

    Thank you.

Maybe you are looking for