Routing problem of inside inside via PIX

Similar Questions

• VPN clients cannot access remote sites - PIX, routing problem?

  I have a problem with routing to remote from our company websites when users connect via their VPN client remotely (i.e. for home workers)

  Our headquarters contains a PIX 515E firewall. A number of remote sites to connect (via ADSL) to head office using IPSEC tunnels, ending the PIX.

  Behind the PIX is a router 7206 with connections to the seat of LANs and connections to a number of ISDN connected remote sites. The default route on 7206 points to the PIX from traffic firewall which sits to ADSL connected remote sites through the PIX. Internal traffic for LAN and ISDN connected sites is done via the 7206.

  Very good and works very well.

  When a user connects remotely using their VPN client (connection is interrupted on the PIX) so that they get an IP address from the pool configured on the PIX and they can access resources located on local networks to the office with no problems.

  However, the problem arises when a remote user wants access to a server located in one of the remote sites ADSL connected - it is impossible to access all these sites.

  On the remote site routers, I configured the access lists to allow access from the pool of IP addresses used by the PIX. But it made no difference. I think that the problem may be the routes configured on the PIX itself, but I don't know what is necessary to solve this problem.

  Does anyone have suggestions on what needs to be done to allow access to remote sites for users connected remotely via VPN?

  (Note: I suggested a workaround, users can use a server on LAN headquarters as a "jump point" to connect to remote servers from there)

  with pix v6, no traffic is allowed to redirect to the same interface.

  for example, a remote user initiates an rdp session for one of the barns adsl. PIX decrypts the packet coming from the external interface and looks at the destination. because the destination is one of adsl sites, pix will have to return traffic to the external interface. Unfortunately, pix v6.x has a limitation that would force the pix to drop the packet.

  with the v7, this restriction has been removed with the "same-security-traffic control intra-interface permits".

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a008046f307.shtml

• VPN inside a PIX (General Questions)

  Hello

  I'm trying to implement a scenario of communication between a customer inside a pix that talks to a server on the outside. The customer must have an ipsec inside connection. I have the following config and a few questions I´d be very happy to get an answer for...

  Backup on the interface outside the security0 Server

  Client safety within 100 interface

  The client IP address is 200.200.212.194

  backup server address is 200.200.202.201

  I want to implement a VPN client connection to the inside interface, and therfore have implemented the following configuration.

  external IP 200.200.202.200 255.255.255.0

  IP address inside 200.200.212.193 255.255.255.192

  access-list 100 permit host 200.200.202.201 ip 10.3.3.0 255.255.255.0

  IP local pool privada 10.3.3.1 - 10.3.3.254

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac RIGHT

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10 transform-set RIGHT

  map mymap 10-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap

  client configuration address map mymap crypto initiate

  client configuration address map mymap crypto answer

  mymap map crypto inside interface

  ISAKMP allows inside

  ISAKMP key * address 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0

  ISAKMP identity address

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10

  ISAKMP policy 10 3des encryption

  ISAKMP policy 10 sha hash

  10 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400

  vpngroup address private pool PRIVADAGROUP

  PRIVADAGROUP vpngroup password *.

  vpngroup split tunnel 100 PRIVADAGROUP

  I have a few questions about this configuration maybe some kind soul able to respond.

  1. the VPN clients receive an address (10.3.3.1) for example through the IKE negotiation. When I ping my server from the client with the active VPN tunnel I assume the real package that passes through the wire has 10.3.3.1 a source address and a destination of 200.200.212.193 (endpoint the VPN and inside interface). Within IPSEC, the package is my real ip with a source 200.200.212.194 address (address of the real client) and a destination address of 200.200.202.201 (address of the backup server that I am trying to ping). If all this makes sense and is correct could you confirm the following point.

  2 when the PIX deencrypts the package and removes the IPSEC header I find myself with my IP packet of origin with a source 200.200.212.194 address (address of the real client) and a destination address of 200.200.202.201 (address of the backup server that I am trying to ping). I don't know if I need then the following configuration to allow the package to be transferred to the backup without NAT server:

  access-list allowed sheep host ip 200.200.212.194 255.255.255.0 200.200.202.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep

  I was previously using the following configuration and it seemed to work but the more I think the less sense it seems to do as I´d wait for the SENATE to run on the dencypted package. I must be missing something or confused, or both.

  IP 10.3.3.0 allow Access-list sheep 255.255.255.0 200.200.202.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep

  3. as a last and probably least I m pretty sure I don't have to line "isakmp key * address 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0" when connecting with a VPN client software only. Somone can confirm that for me.

  I'm actually trying to get this to work remotely with someone else doing the actual work and we don't speak the same language.

  Any help to store my confused brain would be appreciated.

  1. No, it's the other way around. The real package that passes through the wire has the address IP of the PC (200.200.212.194) as a source. Within the IPSec packet is allocated 10.3.3.1 as source IP address. When the PIX decrypts the packet, the outer header is removed, and the package has a source of 10.3.3.1 as it is sent to your server on the outside. The external server will respond to 10.3.3.1 so it must be routed to the PIX for her to work.

  Think of this as the normal instance with the PC to the outside through the Internet. A package from of and sent to 10.3.3.1 would never do to the original PC. The encrypted IPSec packet always contains the VPN endpoints real IP source and destination addresses. The decrypted original deck contains allocated as source IP and the actual destination as destination (usually also a private address) computer.

  2. This should make more sense now that you know the answer to 1.

  3. you don't need that if you have a "vpngroup password xxxx" command. This command «isakmp key...» "If there is no specific vpngroup key, or someone connects with a different groupname.

• Cisco SG300 / ASA 5505 intervlan routing problem

  Dear all

  I have a problem with the configuration correctly sg300 layer 3 behind the ASA 5505 switch (incl. license more security)

  The configuration is the following:

  CISCO SG300 is configured as a layer 3 switch

  VLAN native 1: 192.168.1.254, default route ip address (inside interface ASA 192.168.1.1)

  VLAN defined additional switch

  VLAN 100 with 192.168.100.0/24, default gateway 192.168.100.254

  VLAN 110 with 192.168.110.0/24, default gateway 192.168.110.254

  VLAN 120 with 172.16.0.0/16, default gateway 172.16.10.254

  Of the VLANS (100,110,120) different, I am able to connect to all devices on the other VIRTUAL local networks (with the exception of Native VLAN 1; is not the ping requests)

  From the switch cli I can ping my firewall (192.168.1.1) and all the other gateways of VLANs and vlan (VLAN1, 100, 110, 120) devices

  Asa cli I can only ping my switch (192.168.1.254) port, but no other devices in other VLAN

  My question is this. What should I change or installation in the switch configuration or asa so that other VLANs to access the Internet through the ASA. I will not use the ASA as intervlan routing device, because the switch does this for me

  I tried to change the asa int e0/1 in trunkport (uplink port switch also), to enable all the VLANS, but as soon as I do that, I can not ping 192.168.1.254 ASA cli more.

  Any help is greatly appreciated

  Concerning

  Edwin

  Hi Edwin, because the switch is layer 3, the only necessary behavior is to ensure that default gateways to the computer are set on the SVI interface connection to the switch to make sure that the switch is transfer traffic wished to the ASA.

  The configuration between the ASA and the switch must stay true by dot1q, such as the vlan all other, unidentified native VLAN tagged.

  Also, if I'm not wrong, on the SAA you must set the security level of the port to 100.

  -Tom
  Please evaluate the useful messages

• VPN via Pix 515

  Hello forum, I have a question please answer if someone knows the answer...

  Here is my scenario:

  Central location Pix515 (192.168.0.0/24)

  Location 1: (192.168.1.0/24)

  Situation 2: (192.168.2.0/24)

  Location 3: (192.168.3.0/24) local pool for vpn clients

  192.168.0.0/24, 192.168.1.0/24 lan - LAN IPSEC

  192.168.0.0/24 for 192.168.2.0/24 lan - lan IPSEC

  192.168.0.0/24 to 192.168.3.0/24 ezvpn IPSEC

  Question:

  Is it posible to connect Location1 and Location2 via Pix, or Location1 and Location3?

  On encryption ACLs on each location of traffic destined to another location is included for the encryption process.

  for example, location1 acl:

  Access 100 per 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

  Access 100 per 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0

  Access 100 per 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0

  other locations have a similar LCD-s

  There is no problem to access locations 192.168.0.0/24, but traffic between sites does not work.

  I think that pix encrypt packets outside ariving.

  I know, it's possible on IOS with IPSEC over GRE tunnels with some routing, but PIX?

  Republic of Korea

  Hi Rok-

  Allows traffic between VPN sites does not currently work with Pix OS 6.3.4 and earlier. Code pix 7.0, which will be published later this year, will enable traffic between the same interfaces of VPN security level. This will allow talked to talk communication. I have configured the week last with Pix 7.0 beta code, so I know this is a new feature and it will work.

  IOS does not have this limitation with IPSec. The GRE is not required to IOS to make communication speaks to talk work, although it can be used.

  I hope this helps you understand what is happening.

  Please let us know this that followed by questions that you have.

  Thank you!

  Peter

  PS., pls remember to note the positions so others will know if we have provided you with the information you need!

• Routing problem between the VPN Client and the router's Ethernet device

  Hello

  I have a Cisco 1721 in a test environment.

  A net 172.16.0.0/19 simulates the Internet and a net 192.168.1.0/24 simulates the net, the VPN tunnel must go to (intranet).

  The net 172.16.0.0 depends on the router 0 FastEthernet, Intranet (VPN) hangs on Ethernet 0.

  The configuration was inspired form the sample Configuration

  "Configuring the Client VPN Cisco 3.x for Windows to IOS using Local extended authentication"

  and the output of the ConfigMaker configuration.

  Authentication and logon works. Client receives an IP address from the pool. But there's a routing problem

  side of routers. Ping client-side - do not work (the VPN client statistics that count encrypt them packets, but not to decrypt).

  Ping the router works too, but decrypt and encrypt customer statistics in VPN packets count progressive

  (customer has a correct route and return ICMP packets to the router).

  The question now is:

  How to route packets between the Tunnel and an Ethernet device (Ethernet 0)?

  conf of the router is attached - hope that's not too...

  Thanks & cordially

  Thomas Schmidt

  -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- snipp .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

  !

  version 12.2

  horodateurs service debug uptime

  Log service timestamps uptime

  encryption password service

  !

  !

  host name * moderator edit *.

  !

  enable secret 5 * moderator edit *.

  !

  !

  AAA new-model

  AAA authentication login userauthen local

  AAA authorization groupauthor LAN

  !

  ! only for the test...

  !

  username cisco password 0 * moderator edit *.

  !

  IP subnet zero

  !

  audit of IP notify Journal

  Max-events of po verification IP 100

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 3

  3des encryption

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  !

  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group 3000client

  key cisco123

  pool ippool

  !

  ! We do not want to divide the tunnel

  ! ACL 108

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac RIGHT

  !

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

  Set transform-set RIGHT

  !

  map clientmap client to authenticate crypto list userauthen

  card crypto clientmap isakmp authorization list groupauthor

  client configuration address map clientmap crypto answer

  10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap Dynamics dynmap

  !

  interface Ethernet0

  no downtime

  Description connected to VPN

  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

  full-duplex

  IP access-group 101 in

  IP access-group 101 out

  KeepAlive 10

  No cdp enable

  !

  interface Ethernet1

  no downtime

  address 192.168.3.1 IP 255.255.255.0

  IP access-group 101 in

  IP access-group 101 out

  full-duplex

  KeepAlive 10

  No cdp enable

  !

  interface FastEthernet0

  no downtime

  Description connected to the Internet

  IP 172.16.12.20 255.255.224.0

  automatic speed

  KeepAlive 10

  No cdp enable

  !

  ! This access group is also only for test cases!

  !

  no access list 101

  access list 101 ip allow a whole

  !

  local pool IP 192.168.10.1 ippool 192.168.10.10

  IP classless

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.12.20

  enable IP pim Bennett

  !

  Line con 0

  exec-timeout 0 0

  password 7 * edit from moderator *.

  line to 0

  line vty 0 4

  !

  end

  ^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^- snapp ^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-

  Thomas,

  Can't wait to show something that might be there, but I don't see here. You do not have the card encryption applied to one of the interfaces, perhaps it was not copied. Assuming your description you do it, or should it be, applied to the fa0 and you are connected. Try how you ping? Since the router or a device located on E0? If you ping the router, you will need to do an extended ping of E0 to the ip address of the client has been assigned. If your just ping the router without the extension, you will get sales and decrypts that you declare on the client. Have you tried to ping from the client to interface E0? Your default route on the router is pointing to fa0? You have a next hop to affect? You have several NIC on the client pc? Turn off your other network cards to check that you don't have a problem with routing on the client if you have more than one.

  Kurtis Durrett

• Routing based on the source in PIX

  Hello

  I am trying to find a way to make a routing based on the PIX source to get the same functionality of the 'road-map' command in Cisco routers; is there an equivalent command for this PIX 7.x version? I remember that it was not available in previous versions and I couldn't discover version 7.x, also, but I wanted to confirm with you double.

  Thanking in advance.

  Kind regards

  Haitham

  Haitham,

  Your interpretation is correct, Policy Based Routing is not supported on the Pix Firewall.

  Also, don't you confused when you see the command option 'road-map' Pix 6.3 and higher. This command is applicable only when redistributing routes into OSPF.

  6.3 Pix command reference:

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/iaabu/PIX/pix_sw/v_63/cmdref/Mr.htm#wp1017196

  Command reference 7.2 pix

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/multisec/asa_sw/v_7_2/cmd_ref/qr_711.htm#wp1648744

  Let me know if it helps.

  Kind regards

  Arul

• Unable to connect via the wireless router "problem with wireless adapter or access point" _

  Hello

  I recently replaced my old Toshiba laptop with a new model of Toshiba Satellite L500/033HNX, it installed Windows 7.

  The problem is that I can't connect to my wireless network. I am currently connected via Ethernet cable to my Linksys router.

  I had help from my internet service provider, the installation correctly the problem not because of the connection.

  I had a Linksys online support, the router is a wireless, model - WAG54G ADSL gateway, is not the problem of all the correct settings and other devices can connect via my wireless network. I ran Dr. connectivity several times and it is always impossible to connect, "problem with the wireless adapter or access point.

  OK, you're my next hope to solve the problem can you HELP Please!

  Hi, JoelbX
  I want to thank very you much for your support and effort do to help me solve this problem, but we receive have been, and I don't want to waste any more of your valuable time, so I am the son of closing and deleting of Tring in Microsoft Answers.
  All the best
  Tring

• Problems with a printer via wireles router two laptops, test message says not UPnP supported 0 x 80070035.

  Have checked all resorcess so far, error message microsoft search bar after kodak printer has 0 x 80070035

  Hello

  • What is the full error message that you receive?
  • What were the changes made before the problem occurred?

  You can view these methods:

  Method 1:

  I suggest you to disable any program of security on your computer and check if it solves the problem.
  After reviewing the question you must reactivate the security on your computer program.
  Note: Run the computer without antivirus software or firewall is a potential threat to the computer; Be sure to activate security software after completing the troubleshooting steps and after identifying the problem.

  Method 2:

  Alternatively, you can try to uninstall the Kodak drivers and reinstall it and check.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/uninstall-or-change-a-program

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/install-a-program

  See also:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/printer-problems-in-Windows

• Arial fonts in PDFs former problems!  {Inside photos}

  Hi all.

  This is the problem as much as I can explain it!

  I have pdf files that were created on a Mac origanally (I use Win 7) using the Arial Narrow font family.  I read all of the posted questions

  the policy of Arial Narrow problems, but none solved the problem.  Here are the screenshots of what, in my view, could be the cause.

  When I look at the properties in Acrobat for the PDF in question, here's what fonts appear.

  

  The only font that correctly displays is true font type Arial Black.  Type1 ArialNarrow views

  as shown in the image below. Another thing to note: notice how ArialNarrow is one word?

  Is this perhaps why Illustrator is having a problem with it?  I tried to find it with no luck.

  When opened in Illustrator CS2, it is what is displayed.

  

  The fonts are in my repertoire of fonts in Windows and Illustrator.  I even loaded the old 2.35

  a version which is mentioned on the net.

  The problem is that I have hunderds these documents some with more than 200 pages each.  I messed up

  with this for several days now and I am at a loss of what to do next.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  Mark

  Substitution of fonts in Illustrator by using Type > find font is not going to work.

  If you look at the screenshots, you will see that the fonts are CID fonts with custom coding. The fonts on the computer of brands have probably ANSI encoding (for example standard Western character set) and character cards will not match. So you will not get text legible but just squares or other things (diamonds, points etc.)

  Mark sent me a file to look at and here's what I wrote in direct e-mail to him.

  The problem is that the PDF was made directly from InDesign, which converts the fonts fonts CID (normally used for Asian fonts such as Chinese, Japanese and Korean) and, in so doing, he created a table of characters (encoding) that is not compatible with our ordinary fonts that use the character of Western (ANSI) encoding. Which explains why the replacement police incorporated by one on your system does not work.

  There is some info on the Adobe website at the following links:
  http://kb2.Adobe.com/CPS/329/329611.html
  http://InDesignSecrets.com/CID-identity-h-fonts-are-back.php
  http://forums.Adobe.com/thread/324995

  Also, the problem of the CID character exists in Acrobat 7 and 8, but got solved in Acrobat 9.

  The only thing that has worked to get a PDF with readable and editable text was to use an OCR program (Abby FineReader in my case, but Omnipage can do the same thing) to process the PDF and embedded fonts are basically OCR'ed use system fonts and then resave PDFs had basically the same effect that replace the embedded fonts to system fonts. After that opening the PDF file in Illustrator has normal text and the file can be changed. Although Serif DrawPlus does a better job by opening the PDF file in editable format.

  In this case, the road of the OCR is an option because the PDF contained a table. If this had been a drawing that the OCR option can be less useful depending on how the OCR software manage the drawing part, unless you get the text on the PDF and reinsert it into the drawing would be sufficient.

  The above information may be of some use to those who are faced with the same problem.

• WRT600N advanced routing problems / use as Access Point and switch

  Firmware 1.01.36 build 4 The WRT600N is connected to an existing LAN and is really only used as a Wireless N access point. There is nothing plugged into the WAN port; only the LAN port. I have NAT disabled. All traffic from a client connected to the WRT600N wireless going very well for the gateway and the Internet router. The customer experience is very good. However, there are a few minor issues as follows.

  1] Setup > Advanced Routing tab has only the following options; to do this, * not * have a picker 'Mode '. NAT, static routing and dynamic routing (RIP).    IS this NORMAL, OR should HAVE a MODE (e.g. switch) AS REFERRED to IN THE HELP FILES?

  [2] even if a connection wireless or wired to the WRT600N works very well, the WRT600N himself is unable to connect to the internet. It cannot connect to NTP to set the time and I can't ping past the gateway router using the ping of the WRT600N diagnostic utility. I ping the gateway 192.168.1.4 port inside, but I can't use the diagnostic the WRT600N ping ping utility something beyond this gateway port. The routing of the WRT600N table is below. THE GATEWAY SHOULD NOT BE 192/168.1.4? HOWEVER THE WRT600N DON'T ME LETS NOT CHANGE IT.

  Destination LAN IP Subnet Mask gateway interface

  192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.71 LAN & Wireless

  127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 * LAN & Wireless

  Topic 1. Linksys, used to have a mode option to switch between the modes 'Bridge' and 'router '. The latest routers call it now better NAT power. Gateway mode means THAT NAT is enabled. Router mode means THAT NAT is disabled. The help files are probably a little bit over. But the option is still the same.

  Re 2. It's normal if you use it as only access point (i.e. do not use the WAN port). The router always takes into account that the internet connection via the WAN port, i.e. it will always use the default gateway on the WAN port. If nothing is connected to the WAN port on the router itself has no default gateway and therefore has no access to the internet. Generally, you are not able to establish the default route in either advanced routing page. It is a known limit of these routers if you do not use as a router.

• PowerConnect 6248 routing problem

  Hi all

  I have a very frustrating problem with routing using a PowerConnect 6248 switch.

  Network configuration is the following:

  VLAN3

  172.16.0.254/24

  VLAN4

  192.168.0.254/24

  PC on each VLAN using the switch VLAN interface IP (x.x.x.254) as the gateways.

  Switch has configured default route to 192.168.0.248 which is a router with excess of 100 subnets frame relay cloud. 192.168.0.248 has routes suitable for all remote subnets via a serial interface, a static route to VLAN 3 (172.16.0.0/24) traffic through 192.168.0.254 and one way by default via a PIX 515 (192.168.0.253). Router and PIX is connected to access VIRTUAL 4 LAN ports. The PIX has a route to VLAN 3 traffic through 192.168.0.254.

  The problem is that VIRTUAL 3 all hosts on the local network cannot access the Internet. They can ping the gateways in the order - 172.16.0.254, 192.168.0.248 and 192.168.0.253. I have disabled IP forwarding on the router and the switch with no effect.

  I built this configuration in Cisco Packet Tracer 5.0 (it works) and we are running exactly the same IP configuration with a Nortel switch instead of the Dell 6248 (this also works).

  Absoloutely perplexed to find out what I'm missing! I also noticed that if I perform a traceback while in the CLI on the router using a source IP address of the interface VLAN that it blocks the interface on the switch.

  I would be very grateful to anyone who can punch me in the right direction.

  I've included the config switch below.

  Configure
  database of VLAN
  VLAN 2-4
  subnet of VLAN association 172.16.0.0 255.255.255.0 3
  subnet of VLAN association 192.168.11.0 255.255.255.0 2
  subnet of VLAN association 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 4
  output
  battery
  1 2 Member
  output
  IP 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
  no console logging
  no ip redirection
  IP routing
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.248
  bootpdhcprelay enable
  bootpdhcprelay IP_serveur 192.168.0.3
  router RIP
  no activation
  output
  interface vlan 2
  name of the "voice."
  Routing
  IP 192.168.11.254 255.255.255.0
  output
  interface vlan 3
  name "workstations".
  Routing
  IP 172.16.0.254 255.255.255.0
  output
  interface vlan 4
  "Name servers".
  Routing
  IP 192.168.0.254 255.255.255.0
  output
  level of 3c9fd59f1a240ff455a9d9e8eebae936 user name 'admin' password encrypted 15
  router ospf
  no activation
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g1
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2-4
  switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 1
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g2
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2-4
  switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 1
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g3
  switchport access vlan 2
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g4
  switchport access vlan 2
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g5
  switchport access vlan 2
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g6
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g7
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2-4
  switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 1
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g8
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g9
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g10
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g11
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g12
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g13
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g14
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g15
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g16
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g17
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g18
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g19
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g20
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g21
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g22
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g23
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2-4
  switchport trunk allowed vlan remove 1
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g24
  switchport access vlan 3
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g25
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g26
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g27
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g28
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g29
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g30
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g31
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g32
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g33
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g34
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g35
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g36
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g37
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g38
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g39
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g40
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g41
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g42
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g43
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g44
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g45
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g46
  switchport access vlan 4
  output
  output

  
  

• Cisco SA540 - classic routing problem - 0.0.0.0 in static road

  Hello, I am a bit newbie with routing device,

  I had several public IP address

  I got a Cisco Pix 501and want to replace it with a Cisco SA540

  My Wan IP on Pix 501 is 195.68.x.z
  My Lan IP on Pix 501 is 62.23.a.b (and 62.23.a.c,...)

  My rules Pix 501 translation is: inside the interface. inside: everything: 0.0.0.0. Apart from the interface. same as orginal
  My Pix 501 static route: outside | IP address 0.0.0.0. Mask 0.0.0.0. Gateway IP 195.168.x.y | Metric 1

  So when a computer with 62.23.a.X want access to the internet the static route he say to throuw the 195.168.x.y of the IP Address of the gateway (as I undestand)

  I replicate this config on my SA540

  Also, through the Web user interface, I configure the Wan and Lan IP
  and then in the routing menu, I check "Classic routing" so I go to the static Menu to add the same route as in my Pix 501, but I can't put 0.0.0.0 in iP address or IP subnet mask.

  Can someone help me?

  Thank you very much.

  Hello

  I hope this finds you doing well.  Just thought I would add a few things here...

  You have probably seen this, but... Here is the link to the page SA500:

  https://www.myciscocommunity.com/docs/doc-10526

  Yes, when you configure the device as a router, you need to configure routing.  Try to remove the routes and the readd.

  In addition, a little off topic, but if you want to stay with an ASA5505, there used to be a tool that would turn your PIX configus ASA.  I don't remember where this link is now... but it used to fairly simple transition.

  After you have configured the routing, since your internal machine, have you tried a trace route?  On what device the traceroute fails?

  In case you wish to speak to a support representative, here is the link to find the correct number:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html

  HTH,

  Andrew Lee Lissitz

• Problems with VPN between Cisco PIX 6.3.3 and VPN 3000 Concentrator

  Hi guys,.

  I hope this is the right place and that someone has encountered this before I don't have much hair left to offset - I'm trying to set up a tunnel between our Pix 6.3.3 performer and a customer using a VPN3000.

  The customer wants us to be able to do checkups on a device without allowing anything to of our range of addresses network side private, just one public IP address.  We currently run a VPN to our recovery site to allow off-site replication, but the ACL on the other end of this VPN * does * allow the configuration that we had for our private network side, so traffic was not useful at that.  Here is a screenshot of what I tried:

  ethernet0 nameif outside security0
  nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
  nameif ethernet2 dmz1 security50

  name 172.16.1.48 Cust_DVR1

  permit 192.168.1.0 ip access list inside_outbound_nat0_acl 255.255.255.0 255.255.255.255 Cust_DVR1

  permit 192.168.1.0 ip access list outside_cryptomap_30 255.255.255.0 255.255.255.255 Cust_DVR1

  IP outside X.Y.Z.227 255.255.255.224
  IP address inside 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

  location of PDM Cust_DVR1 255.255.255.255 outside

  Global 1 X.Y.Z.230 (outside)
  Global (dmz1) 1 interface
  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_outbound_nat0_acl
  NAT (inside) 1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 0 0

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac

  outside_map 30 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  outside_map 30 peer A.B.C.D crypto card game<--- (public="" ip="" of="" customer="">

  card crypto outside_map 30 match address centura_map_30

  card crypto outside_map 30 the transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 value

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  ISAKMP key * A.B.C.D netmask 255.255.255.255 No.-xauth No. config-mode

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 30

  ISAKMP policy 30 3des encryption

  ISAKMP policy 30 md5 hash

  30 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP duration strategy of life 30 86400

  My hope is that anything on the 192.168.1.0/24 would be able to get out of the external interface as our only our public IP addresses (i.e. X.Y.Z.230), but the traffic they see on the other end is coming from the 192.168.1.0 network.  I tried to remove the line inside_outbound_nat0_acl think she would use then the world but still do not have a bit of luck and the only difference I see on Kiwi Syslogd is that the src_proxy changes to 0.0.0.0 where is shows the IP address of my private side (for the purposes of the config above let's call it 192.168.1.135).

  THANKS MUCH FOR ANY HELP!

  -Mario

  Hello

  For example, you can NAT your internal via the tunnel network traffic when you go to this customer.

  In this way, they will see your unique internal network as an IP address.

  Let's say, rather than them seeing your internal 192.168.1.0/24, eelle will see your traffic like X.Y.Z.227

  Is this what you need?

  Federico.

• IPSec site to site VPN cisco VPN client routing problem and

  Hello

  I'm really stuck with the configuration of ipsec site to site vpn (hub to spoke, multiple rays) with cisco vpn remote client access to this vpn.

  The problem is with remote access - cisco vpn client access - I can communicate with hub lan - but I need also communication of all lans speaks of the cisco vpn client.

  There are on the shelves, there is no material used cisco - routers DLINK.

  Someone told me that it is possible to use NAT to translate remote access IP-lan-HUB customers and thus allow communication - but I'm unable to set up and operate.

  Can someone help me please?

  Thank you

  Peter

  RAYS - not cisco devices / another provider

  Cisco 1841 HSEC HUB:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  ISAKMP crypto key x xx address no.-xauth

  !

  the group x crypto isakmp client configuration

  x key

  pool vpnclientpool

  ACL 190

  include-local-lan

  !

  86400 seconds, duration of life crypto ipsec security association

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac 1cisco

  !

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

  Set transform-set 1cisco

  !

  card crypto ETH0 client authentication list userauthen

  card crypto isakmp authorization list groupauthor ETH0

  client configuration address card crypto ETH0 answer

  ETH0 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  set peer x

  Set transform-set 1cisco

  PFS group2 Set

  match address 180

  card ETH0 10-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap

  !

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  Description $ES_WAN$

  card crypto ETH0

  !

  IP local pool vpnclientpool 192.168.200.100 192.168.200.150

  !

  !

  overload of IP nat inside source list LOCAL interface FastEthernet0/1

  !

  IP access-list extended LOCAL

  deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  IP 192.168.7.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

  !

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  !

  How the DLINK has been configured for traffic between the site to site VPN subnets? You are able to add multiple remote subnets on DLINK? If you can, then you must add the pool of Client VPN subnet.

  Alternatively, if you cannot add multiple subnet on DLINK router, you can change the pool of Client VPN 192.168.6.0/24, and on the crypto ACL between the site to site VPN, you must edit the 180 existing ACL

  DE:

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  TO:

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.1.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  Also change the ACL 190 split tunnel:

  DE:

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  TO:

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

  Finally, replace the remote subnet 192.168.7.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.6.0/255.255.254.0 DLINK.

  Hope that helps.