RV042 VPN multiple offices

Similar Questions

• Customer quick RV042 VPN cannot ping lan network

  Hi guys,.

  I just created a client2gateway on RV042 IPSec tunnel and use the remote PC quick VPN client tries to connect to this router.

  Fast VPN showed that the tunnel has been established. But I couldn't ping the LAN behind the router RV042.

  Can someone help me?

  Thank you.

  Hello

  Yes, you are right. To use the fast with RV042 VPN, it is necessary to configure the user name and a password for access to the VPN Client page. As this router does not support VLANs, you can only connect the VPN client to the LAN subnet (you cannot connect the client to any beach IP configured with multiple subnets)

  Kind regards

  Bismuth

• Two RV042 VPN has been a problem to get to the third-party router

  Hello, I have two RV042 connected via VPN very well.    First network let's call A.A.A.A Second network have also RV042 to B.B.B.253.   B.B.B. network, we have Cisco router another provider to B.B.B.254.    On this second network configuration on B.B.B.253 (our default gateway) saying that all traffic will C.C.C.C I have routing tables (just an IP address not a subnet) must pass through the router Cisco at B.B.B.254 and the location of B.B.B.B works well.

  What I'm trying to accomplish, is the unique through the RV042 VPN network A.A.A.A than when I go to C.C.C.C of IP address and get passed out through B.B.B.254 (Cisco of the seller).   I had the seller put the roads in their router to be able to deliver the A.A.A.A network and can ping on both networks.   Specifically, I can ping from A.A.A.A to B.B.B.254.   However, I would like to install my on A.A.A.A routing tables so that whenever someone goes to the unique address of C.C.C.C it passed through the VPN to the B.B.B.254.   All my efforts have failed.   I do not exclude the seller screwed up somewhere, but have been working on this all day and am running out of ideas.  It's for all the suggestions and thanks for any help!

  Concerning

  It is not possible. The RV042 using a simple IPSec VPN Tunnel tunnel. Plain IPSec has routable interfaces. You cannot add static routes to handle additional traffic through the tunnel. IPSec will be tunnel only traffic that matches local & remote security groups. Because C.C.C.C is not part of a security group that he will not get in the tunnel.

• RV042 VPN configuration

  I'm looking for help to the RV042 configuration for VPN access to local machines and Win 2008 Server.  History: had problems with remote printers created for customers log into old Linksys RV042 VPN Linksys software.  First Tech exposed server without security, and it had to be removed because he was attacked, but did not print problem.  2nd tech failed to get VPN to work after 1 tech.  3rd tech 4hours and I got the router is a piece of...  I am so on more than 1000 and unable to have a simple router put in place.  The current situation.  New RV042 with the V4.1.1.01 firmware, using the Cisco VPN client 5.0.07.0410, most of the 32-bit machines on network XP, a 64-bit win 7.  My customers do not have access to their data for too long and I need a quick fix.  Willing to pay, just the person to really know what they are doing.  Thanks in advance.  (I hope its ok to offer to hire someone!)

  Mike,

  I am sorry to hear that you're having these problems and even more sorry to tell you that you have problems with the client VPN Cisco 5.x because the RV042 does not support this VPN client. Cisco VPN client is an enterprise-level software utility that uses the IPsec protocols to connect. What you should use is Cisco VPN fast. Cisco VPN client authenticates in 2 phases while the RV042 and Cisco Qvpn authenticates in 1 phase. The router doesn't understand just how to manage connections from the Cisco VPN client. I've included a link to the Cisco Qvpn utility below. Hope this helps

  http://www.Cisco.com/Cisco/software/release.html?mdfid=282414010&softwareid=282465795&release=1.4.2.1&relind=available&rellifecycle=&RelType=latest

  Blake Wright

  HWC Cisco network engineer

• Router RV042 VPN Client access from Linux?

  Hello world!

  I have a question for the creators and users of RV042.

  Is there a way to communicate with a Linux box for access on a RV042 VPN client? I'm trying to do that and play with the settings, but I am not able to connect. I tried profiles in OpenVPN, OpenSwan, kVPNc and others. For the most part, my problem is that all of these software require too many parameters and other certificates that only types that you can create on a RV042 (.pem files).

  Please let me know if any of you were able to connect to a Linux box for on a RV042 VPN.

  Also, I would ask the CISCO/Linksys people why they provide only a Windows client for this option? "Small companies" are devices not windows based commercial devices!

  Thank you!

  Zoli

  Good day Zoli,

  Unfortunately, there is not any Quickvpn client available for Linux and Macintosh which work together with the Small Business/Small Business routers Pro.

  If I share your dismay that we do not formally use Quickvpn with all Linux distributions or any Mac OS, we have seen limited success with solutions that allow the use of third party VPN Clients when used in conjunction with our routers.

  I'm curious to know whether or not you have explored Shrew Soft VPN Client (a simple Google search will yield results). I'm currently taking a look and to experiment a little bit on my end to see if there is anything we can get to work. If you can, please let me know what you use distribution, what version and a list of all customers third-party vpn that you used.

  Personally, I'd love to see the development of a guide that we as support engineers to help all of our Linux-savvy customer.

  Thanks for your patience!

• How to configure RV042 VPN to use Windows 7 client native IPSec?

  The question is in the title, I want to make the Windows client compatible with my RV042 VPN because Shrew Soft VPN fail to tunel after that little time and QuickVPN do not support Windows 7 or a 64-bit version of Windows.

  Windows does not have an IPSec client, what they offer is a VPN client that can connect to PPTP, L2TP/IPsec (on IPSec), IKEv2. To connect directly to the router RV that our only option is to connect over PPTP once the PPTP server protocol is enabled on the router. If you have a server located behind the router, you can configure to be an endpoint to one of the above types. Don't know why, Mac and Windows don't have a naked IPSec feature built-in clients.

  Some third-party applications to consider:

  Windows: ShrewSoft IPSec Client

  Mac OS X: IPSecuritas

  Both are relative simple to set up and on the routers RV0xx work fantastic and an exellent substitute QVPN. With these applications you set up the tunnel as a group and use the "XP/2000 Microsoft VPN Client ' option." " This option is a bit misleading because it seems to imply that the native VPN client can support IPSec settings, when it referred only that a computer would use this option during its WAN IP address is not always known.

  I hope this helps.

• Rv042 VPN Customer

  Hello

  I'm trying to configure the VPN but get no success, to my seat, I have a cisco-3825 Cisco-5515-x, at the office, I have 1 rv042.

  My site to site VPN configuration works very well. But what I want now all the internet traffic of my branch should move from my seat, with the seat only, IP as little of our app only works with our Office IP.

  For VPN Site to Site, I use 3825 and rv042, my 5515-x does not get used for this VPN, I use it for other purposes. Mode routed to the case where if it takes I can configure for VPN too.

  Any help or ideas will be appreciated.

  Thank you

  If you need to make the field of encryption .

  On the 3825 to the default route inside the ASA.  Then add static routes for the public IP addresses remote VPN concentrators on the external interface of the 3825.

  This could also be done using VRF if you hate a 'Data' or "AppX" license on your 3825.

• RV042 VPN public ip

  Hello everyone,

  I ' v bumping my head again and again with this issue... I need to configure a tunnel ipsec VPN with a service provider, they require that the first negotiating phase vpn ip address is public (which is normal "Local Security Gateway") and the need to address public ip for the second phase ("group of Local Security") it is im having problems on the source of the request service must be a public ip address as well. When I created my tunnel with their configuration. I have no problem to have the tunnel connected.

  

  

  

  The problem comes when I have to configure my computer with the public ip address and connect to the RV042 router in order to access the tunnel... So I tried to put a local ip address to my computer lets say 10.1.10.102 and then do a NAT with ip address public xx.xx.xx.37

  When I do this i never send packets from my computer (which is a linux server bdw) through the VPN... and if I give the server the xx.xx.xx.37 address public ip with gateway xx.xx.xx.38 also packages do not go anywhere...

  mainly the problem is to know how to configure my server or gateway to send traffic to my server through vpn! because the tunnel is UP. (remember that the only way that the service provider will acept the connection is with the public ip address on the bridge and on the group.

  OK guys, I just managed to make it work! I just plugged my server on the DMZ port with the public ip address and presto! tour of 1to1 nat!

• RV042 vpn pass trough droping?

  Hello

  I have a Linksys RV042 (defined as a gateway, Firmware Version: 1.3.12.19 - tm) witch I use to balance the load. Two difrent ISP, one in WAN1 defined for ip automaticlly and the other in WAN2 with a static IP address. The two set MTU to 1492.

  On WAN2 I configured a VPN tunnel to another site where I have a Zywall 10w, witch works fine without any problems.

  In the building, we have about 30 computers. Some of them use software that works through a vpn connection. This vpn connects ok until a point when juicing it immediately and it does not connect at least that I reboot the Linksys.

  The newspaper does not say enithing.

  I discovered that when I change the MTU or renew the IP address of the connection drop.

  Is that it must do something with load balancing?

  It is out of memory?

  Discount to zero might help but you must reconfigure everything.

  reflash the firmware.

  HOEP that helps.

• RV042 VPN tunnel with Samsung Ubigate ibg2600 need help

  Hi all, ok before I completely remove all of my hair, I thought stop by here and ask the volume for you all with the hope that someone can track down the problem.

  In short I am configuring a 'Gateway to gateway' vpn tunnel between two sites, I don't have access to the config of the router from Samsung, but the ISPS making sure that they followed my setup - watching newspapers RV042, I don't however see the reason for the failure - im no expert vpn...

  Sorry if the log file turns on a bit, I didn't know where the beginning and the end was stupid I know... any advice would be greatly welcomed lol.

  System log
  Current time: Fri Sep 2 03:37:52 2009 all THE Log Log Log Log VPN Firewall Access system
   
  Time
  Type of event Message
  2 sep 03:36:01 2009 value of VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] Inbound SPI = c3bdba08
  2 sep 03:36:01 2009 value of outbound SPI VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] = c664c1ca
  2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] > initiator send fast Mode 3rd package
  2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] Quick Mode Phase 2 SA established, IPSec Tunnel connected
  2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN journal Dead Peer Detection start, DPD delay = timeout = 10 sec 10 sec timer
  2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN received log delete SA payload: ISAKMP State #627 removal
  2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN Log Main Mode initiator
  2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] > Send main initiator Mode 1 package
  2 sep 03:36:02 2009 charge of VPN journal received Vendor ID Type = [Dead Peer Detection]
  2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation of Info]< initiator="" received="" main="" mode="" 2nd="" packet="">
  2 sep 03:36:02 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] > initiator send Mode main 3rd package
  2 sep 03:36:03 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation of Info]< initiator="" received="" main="" mode="" 4th="" packet="">
  2 sep 03:36:03 2009 Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] VPN > main initiator Mode to send 5 packs
  2 sep 03:36:03 2009 Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] VPN > initiator receive hand Mode 6 Pack
  2 sep 03:36:03 2009 log VPN main mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '87.85.xxx.xxx '.
  2 sep 03:36:03 2009 Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] VPN Mode main Phase 1 SA established
  2 sep 03:36:03 2009 log VPN [Tunnel negotiation Info] initiator Cookies = c527 d584 595 c 2c3b
  2 sep 03:36:03 2009 log VPN [Tunnel negotiation Info] responder Cookies = b62c ca31 1a5f 673f
  2 sep 03:36:03 2009 log quick launch Mode PSK VPN + TUNNEL + PFS
  2 sep 03:36:03 2009 Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] VPN > initiator send fast Mode 1 package
  2 sep 03:36:04 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation of Info]< initiator="" received="" quick="" mode="" 2nd="" packet="">
  2 sep 03:36:04 2009 value of VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] Inbound SPI = c3bdba09
  2 sep 03:36:04 2009 value of outbound SPI VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] = e3da1469
  2 sep 03:36:04 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] > initiator send fast Mode 3rd package
  2 sep 03:36:04 2009 VPN Log [Tunnel negotiation Info] Quick Mode Phase 2 SA established, IPSec Tunnel connected
  2 sep 03:36:04 2009 VPN journal Dead Peer Detection start, DPD delay = timeout = 10 sec 10 sec timer
  2 sep 03:36:05 2009 VPN received log delete SA payload: ISAKMP State #629 removal

  PFS - off on tada and linksys router does not support the samsung lol! connected!

• RV042 VPN issues

  Hi all

  Well, I don't have VPN Linksys configuration in a while and have forgotten most of this, so I was wondering if somebody could please share any knoweldge response and help issues.

  What I want to do is to create VPN tunnels between 2 remote sites for VOIP traffic. At both ends of my tunnel, I have a Linksys router. The main site that two remote sites are connecting to has a RV-042.

  So here's what I need to know:

  1. If I have an existing VPN that runs through the router (the router is currently not my VPN endpoint, a server is) when I place a VPN endpoint on the RV-042 point my existing VPN will be functional?

  2. once the branch establishes as a tunnel with the RV-042 how will be the traffic that is intended to flow from the internet? I wish that only certain traffic flows through the tunnel, more specfically as VOIP traffic.

  3. once the branch establishes a tunnel with the RV-042 how will forward the RV-042? Also, I want just the VOIp traffic through the tunnel that anything that is intended for the internet should not go to the internet... In other words Split tunneling on both ends of the tunnel.

  Router RV - 042 is VPN Head end or head office, if you want to...

  RV-042 Firmware: 1.3.12.6 - tm

  Ideas or things I should look out for. Is this possible to do?

  Topic 1. Perhaps. If you connect to the same endpoint router and a server within the local network, then you will get most likely difficulties.

  Re 2/3. The two parties define the traffic that tunnel is based on IP addresses. You define a local and remote security group that essentially defines the IP addresses in the part of the source and destination of each IP packet. If these are in circulation will be tunnel. If they do not match, the traffic is sent outside the tunnel. The configuration of the tunnel does not specify certain protocols or ports. You can only do this based on the IP address. If you use software phones on the computers that you will not get it work as you want because you can't separate the other traffic of the computer VoIP traffic. If you use hardphone you could put all the phones in a specific subnet or address range, and then set that only those IP addresses go through the tunnel.

• Cisco 1921 - how to configure VPN multiple Tunnels to AWS

  I have a router VPN Cisco 1921. I managed to create tunnel VPN Site to Site with AWS VPN Tunnel 1. AWS offers 2 tunnels, so I created another card Crypto and attaches to the existing policy. But the 2nd tunnel won't come. I don't know what I'm missing... is there a special setup that needs to be done to allow multiple IPsec vpn tunnels on the same physical interface? I have attached a picture and included the configuration of my router, if it helps.

  VPN - 1.jpg

  

  C1921 #sh run
  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 2720 bytes
  !
  ! Last configuration change at 02:12:54 UTC Friday, may 6, 2016, by admin
  !
  version 15.5
  horodateurs service debug datetime msec
  Log service timestamps datetime msec
  encryption password service
  !
  hostname C1921
  !
  boot-start-marker
  boot-end-marker
  !
  !
  logging buffered 52000
  enable secret 5 $1$ jc6L$ uHH55qNhplouO/N5793oW.
  !
  No aaa new-model
  Ethernet lmi this
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  Research of IP source-interface GigabitEthernet0/1 domain
  IP cef
  No ipv6 cef
  !
  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
  !
  !
  !
  license udi pid CISCO1921/K9 sn FTX1845F03F
  !
  !
  username admin privilege 15 password 7 121A0C041104
  paul privilege 0 7 password username 14141B180F0B
  !
  redundancy
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  BA aes
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  lifetime 28800
  ISAKMP crypto keys secret1 address 52.35.42.787
  ISAKMP crypto keys secret2 address 52.36.15.787
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set AWS - VPN aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
  tunnel mode
  !
  !
  !
  map SDM_CMAP_1 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto
  Description Tunnel 1 to 52.35.42.787
  defined by peer 52.35.42.787
  game of transformation-AWS-VPN
  PFS group2 Set
  match address 100
  map SDM_CMAP_1 2 ipsec-isakmp crypto
  Description 2 to 52.36.15.787 Tunnel
  defined by peer 52.36.15.787
  game of transformation-AWS-VPN
  PFS group2 Set
  match address 100
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  the Embedded-Service-Engine0/0 interface
  no ip address
  Shutdown
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/0
  Description connection Wan WAN - ETH$
  IP address 192.168.1.252 255.255.255.0
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto
  !
  interface GigabitEthernet0/1
  Description of the connection to the local network
  IP 192.168.0.252 255.255.255.0
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  !
  IP forward-Protocol ND
  !
  IP http server
  local IP http authentication
  no ip http secure server
  IP http timeout policy slowed down 60 life 86400 request 10000
  !
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.254 permanent

  !
  recording of debug trap
  host 192.168.0.3 record
  host 192.168.0.47 record
  !
  !
  Note access-list 100 permit to AWS Tunnel 1
  Access-list 100 CCP_ACL category = 20 note
  access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 any what newspaper
  Note access-list 101 permit to AWS Tunnel 2
  Note access-list 101 category CCP_ACL = 4
  access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 any logexit
  !
  control plan
  !
  !
  alias con exec conf t
  SIB exec show int short ip alias
  alias exec srb see the race | b
  sri alias exec show run int
  !
  Line con 0
  exec-timeout 0 0
  Synchronous recording
  line to 0
  line 2
  no activation-character
  No exec
  preferred no transport
  transport output pad rlogin lapb - your MOP v120 udptn ssh telnet
  StopBits 1
  line vty 0 4
  privilege level 15
  local connection
  transport of entry all
  transportation out all
  !
  Scheduler allocate 20000 1000
  !
  end

  There should be no second tunnel.

  I use either a peer or the other, but not both at the same time.

  To display both at the same time, you need to use the Tunnel interfaces.  Amazon would have you sent pretty much the exact commands to copy and paste into.

• RV042 VPN site to Site

  Hello please could someone help me regarding my PROBLEM with VPN site-to-site.

  I have installation of gateway to gateway unfortunetly I don't have any static IP address, so I have 2 accounts of DynDNS.org on two installation Sites. The two RV042 connect to another router/Modem.

  I put the two as router in router Mode and not as a gateway.  The VPN status remains tab just to "waiting for connection" I can see the dynamic IP address to connect remotely on the main site and distance from each other.  I can ping so two dyndns names.  But unable to connect...

  The VPN log shows the following.

  ERROR: error report asynchronous network on eth1 to message to the port of 105.237.1.xx 500, complainant 192.168.137.153: no route to the host [errno 148, original ICMP type 3 code 1 (unauthenticated)]

  What is the main site and 192.168.138.0 the remote site, the main site has a subnet of 192.168.137.0

  Please could someone help me or point me in the right direction? Thanks in advance.

  Hi Stephen, it may be a few problems. The first is maybe that you said that you have a modem/router device, this means that it is for the RV042 nating.  If that's the case then the modems/routers upstream need port forwarding to go to the RV042. ICMP type 3 is a destination unreachable error. That means subnet remote th could not be reached by the applicant rv042. This can withdraw your NAT problem with modems/routers.

  So, first thing I would do is port before all the RV042 services to make sure that the firewall on the modems/routers aren't pipe upward works.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• RV042 VPN group &amp; access rules

  I have install a GroupVPN and connect to the RV042 with the client VPN Shrewsoft, works like a charm as opposed to QuickVPN ;-)

  The firewall is configured with an explicit deny for RDP access rule to an internal server, can also be used to explicitly a rule is created for certain numbers of IP as a source. I noticed that I need to create an explicit allow rule for the subnet of the client Shrewsoft is using the virtual adapter or I won't be able to access the internal server via RDP through the tunnel of GroupVPN.

  Is it normal? I think that establishing a tunnel defies the rules created for a direct access to the WAN port.

  Peter

  Sorry, I got my signals crossed with my previous suggestion.  Your answer has cleared up my misunderstanding.  My rule was for a different purpose and it does not work for your situation, I thought it would be.

  redirect port (UPnP or redirection) replaced the firewall rules, but does not completely bypass their. He must work around the default rules for work, but don't not past rules customized.  The trick is to know the translation of transfer goes first, then when it is processed by the firewall, the destination is the IP and the port internal.  In addition, it would seem that VPN works the same way - allows to bypass default firewall but not custom rules.

  Since you want to double your security and have a non-standard port MORE limit access to specific IPs through the rules of firewall, then you are set up correctly.

  The VPN to bypass the firewall completely?   Maybe, but then you wouldn't have the opportunity to clients VPN filter with custom (without a separate section in Firewall VPN) rules.  Given that you have created a custom block rule, you must add an allow rule for everything that comes through the WAN (same VPN) port.   I agree it's annoying, but that's just the way the program is written.

  I didn't test the VPN rules, but I think you can handle this - the only variable would be you allow the public IP address of the remote network or remote LAN subnet range?  I expect the LAN subnet.

  ----------------------

  Other thoughts - I personally just use the non-standard port and leave the RDP Security to take care of himself.  My clients are very small, so the exposure and risk are fairly low.  For a client of profile higher or more secure, I would either put everything inside a VPN connection, or configure as you.  Of course, if the security is so important, maybe you should be on a more expensive (and capable) device?

• Cisco RV042 VPN hub and spokes, connecting spokes question

  Hello

  I have a few Cisco RV042 router and VPN links them with a hub and spoke topology.

  Each speaks VPN works, they manage to connect to the platform.

  The hub can see each VPN active rays.

  A computer under the hub can connect to a computer in any talks.

  A computer under any talks can connect to a computer running the hub.

  Which works very well.

  Now, what I really need, is to connect computers under a RADIUS to connect to computers under another spoke.

  It don't work.

  Current configuration of LAN:

  HUB IP / mask: 192.168.0.1 / 255.255.255.0

  Spoke1 IP / mask: 192.168.1.1 / 255.255.255.0

  Spoke2 IP / mask: 192.168.2.1 / 255.255.255.0

  I was wondering if the Cisco RV042 can be configured to allow that and HOW?

  If we can not do, should what other router I use as a hub? Should I change the rays as well?

  Thank you and have a nice day

  Hope that this document can point you the right direction.

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-12534