ASA 5510 more and Port forwarding

Similar Questions

• The ASA with crossed VPN Port forwarding

  Hello

  I worked on a question for a while and I have managed to track down the issue, but I don't know how to solve the problem.

  I have an ASA 5505 8.4 (7) running with a tunnel for incoming remote users anyconnect vpn. I also want to configure incoming Web server port forwarding.

  The question seems to be traversed rule which stops incoming port forwarding:

  NAT (outside, outside) NETWORK_OBJ_172.16.1.0_28 interface description dynamic source hairpin to natting users vpn on the external interface

  When I disable the port forwarding will work perfectly (according to tracer packet that is).

  I have attached the config to this post. I would appreciate any idea how to get the through VPN and the transfer to the incoming port working.

  The config has been condensed to remove unneed config.

  Thank you

  Hello

  What is the configuration commands, you use to put in place the static PAT (Port Forward)?

  The problem is most likely order of the NAT configurations such as configuring NAT above in the upper part of the NAT configurations.

  Configuring static PAT, that you could use to make it work would be

  the SERVER object network

  host

  service object WWW

  tcp source eq www service

  NAT (server, on the outside) of the interface to the static SERVER 1 source WWW WWW service

  The above assumes the source for the host interface is "Server" and the service that you want to PAT static TCP/80.

  Note that we add the number '1' in the 'nat' command. This will add at the top. The same should be done for any other static PAT you configure you want for these VPN Clients.

  Hope this helps

  -Jouni

• VPN site to Site with NAT and Port forwarding on a 871

  Hello

  Could someone please look at the config 871 router attached and tell me where I'm wrong!

  VPNs all work, work, BUT anyone trying to connect to a port that is sent through the VPN port forwarding fails.

  In the config attached Port 3389 (RDP) is sent to an internal server, if you connect to the external interface Internet connection is made and it works well, but if someone tries to connect to the IP address internal to that same server through VPN, it does not.

  We've added commands to stop working on the lines VPN NAT, but these do not seem to work.

  What Miss me?

  Thank you in advance and I will adjudicate all useful responses.

  It is a common problem. Yes you added controls to prevent NAT to work above the tunnel, but your static nat port to port 3389 takes precedence over the generic nat command, and there not all orders top to prevent it is nat would be above the tunnel.

  I wrote an example configuration for this some time, see here for more details:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094634.shtml

  If all goes well, he explains everything. Note that it is for a general order static host, not a static port that you have, but the concept is exactly the same. Just add a statement roadmap on the end of your static command of the port, and this route map - will reference an ACL that denies are used when going up above the tunnel.

• NETGEAR ProSafe VPN Firewall SRXN3205 and port forwarding?

  Hi, this is a long shot, but I'm pulling my hair out at this point and can be a bit over my head, as I am new on network

  Small short story, I have two servers, one is the NAS box (IE if I connect via the internet to the site via public IP network from home, I get it that site says 'my actions' I insert login and pass and get access to them.)
  That is, everything is peachy.
  The problem is when I try to connect to my FileMaker Server I'm not and instead, he takes me to the login NAS box. So I think ok, I need to port forward (5003 for filemaker) to go to different PC local LAN(192. etc)

  Security > firewall > Add Service entering:
  Service: fmserver
  Action: Always leave
  Send to LAN Server: unique address 192. etc is filemaker installed on (and different on a NAS)
  Definition of Port number: 5003<-- is="" this="" right?="" how="" else="" would="" you="" indicate="" you="" want="" all="" connections="" on="" this="" port="" to="" go="" to="" this="" specific="" lan="" machine="" from="" internet="" instead="" of="" default="" which="" seems="" to="" be="">
  rest is default, I click on apply.

  Here's what I don't understand. In the table of incoming Services, (security > firewall) I have two local IP in the list, a SIN, the other for Filemaker. But only the top works and can be connected to. I can move every top position and it will work, but they will not work at the same time, just the one that sits on the top of the sad Smiley page

  and yes I read the manual again and again and don't know how I'm screwing up the port forwarding on this point, even if I am brand new to probably something stupid Smiley Happy (our work IT guy is gone so tried to get involved through this somehow)

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Hello sinieq,

  There is a hierarchy on incoming service table, which is normal. I see 4 services added using "ANY" (ALL use any port number) you will need to remove/disable these because of the rule of the hierarchy on the table, all other services will be ignored when EVERYTHING is used. What is the port number used by the NAS Server? I don't see a port defined to access NAS. Try disabling services by using "ANY" and try again by adding the translation to the port number of the NAS.

  Let us know what happens.

  Thank you

• Question about WRT54G2 and port forwarding

  Recently, I replaced my WRT54G with a new WRT54G2. My old router had the port forwarding for 2 pc is as follows:

  192.168.1.100

  6073 - UDP port

  2302-2303-TCP port

  192.168.1.101

  2302-2400-UDP

  6073 - at once

  8085 - at once

  TCP port 26100-26110

  27100-27110-both

  When I try to set up my new router, it says I have overlapping of ports. Maybe I'm confused but how could he have been working on my old router and now it does not work on my new?

  Of course, try this, and I think I could solve your problem.

• RV220W and Port forwarding

  Hello

  I have a problem with my Cisco RV220W with Firmware 1.0.3.5

  I have in my local network a Dreambox with the IP 192.168.1.230, he listen Port 8880.

  How can I implement a WAN port forwarding to the Dreambox?

  Thank you

  Michael

  Hi Michael,

  Thank you for posting. Please follow the steps below to transfer the port to your Dreambox:

  1. Log in to the router, then go to: Firewall-> Access Control-Services > custom.
  2. Press 'Add' and then type Dreambox name, TCP for type. The Port of departure and Port of finish will be 8880. Press "Save".
  3. Go to the IPv4 firewall rules and press 'Add '. Use the following settings:

  Area: No reliable (WAN)

  Area: Trust (LAN)

  Service: Dreambox

  Action: Always allow the

  Source host: no

  Send to the Local (DNAT IP) server: type the address LAN IP of the Dreambox here device (i.e. 192.168.1.150)

  Ignore the other settings on this page and press 'Save' at the bottom. You should now be able to reach the Dreambox from the Web using: 8880

  Please let us know if it works or if you need further assistance.

• VPN and port forwarding problem

  Hello

  I configured a VPN (IPSec) between 2 sites on Cisco 881 - K9.

  The server 'A', which the 192.168.0.X address must be accessible on port 80, 8080 and 90 of the public network.

  I have configured the ports of shipment with the command:

  IP nat inside source static TCP 192.168.0.X 90 interface fastethernet 4 90

  IP nat inside source static TCP 192.168.0.X 80 4 80 fastethernet interface

  IP nat inside source static TCP 8080 interface fastethernet 4 8080 192.168.0.X

  The server is accessible from the outside, the site in which it is located.

  But there is a problem with the second site:

  • I ping the server with its local address 192.168.0.X
  • But when I try to open a Web page that is using port 80 or 8080 or 90, the server appears inaccessible

  It seems that the problem is due to the translation of port because when I delete the configuration of port forwarding is no problem over on the second site.

  Thanks for your help

  Hello

  You need conditional NAT.
  When you want to Port Forwarding to work just for a part of traffic, e.g. when access to the server from the Internet
  but not for traffic entering via VPN, you can add a roadmap to the end.

  Thus,.
  IP nat inside source static TCP 192.168.0.X PUBLIC_IP 4 xx xx map route VPN

  The road map tells when it is NAT that will to spend.
  It will always happen, but when traffic is coming from the VPN.

  Now... the problem is that you can add a roadmap, when you have a rule of Port forwarding to an IP address (and not an interface).

  Anyway, give it a try and let us know.

  Federico.

• ASA 5510 replacement and ARP

  Hello support,

  Probably a simple question and can be buried in these forums (but I'm not).

  I am trying to replace one 5510 with another 5510 and have all kinds of difficulties.  Devices the PAT against the external interface have no problem out, but anything with a 1:1 NAT cannot.  Cries of an ARP issue; However, to restart the switch and firewall are without effect.  Is there something else I could potentially be missing.  Configurations are completely reversed.  And the firewall, that the I'm replacing has no problem going out with NAT (static) 1-to-1.  Any ideas?

  Hello

  I assume you mean a L3 switch that you begin with the ASA?

  If this isn't the case, then where is the gateway of your ASA L3 and who manages this device?

  One thing that comes to mind associated with ARP is that if you use several public subnets on your ASA. For example 30 for network connection between your site and the ISP and some 28 as a public subnet for purposes of NAT static. Then you may experience problems IF your software has changed to 8.4 (3) or something higher.

  If ARP is the problem then it is of course the option that makes you check the original interfaces of ASAs (connected to the ISP) MAC address and configure this same MAC address to the new WAN ASAs interface to the ISP.

  You can actually go under the interface and deliver MAC address with the command

  0000.1111.2222 Mac address

  In addition, naturally when it comes to configurations and firewall rules you can always use the command "packet - trace" to simulate the packets from your local network for the EXTENDED or WAN network to the local network and see the race passes through completely.

  -Jouni

• WRT160N V3 DMZ and Port-Forwarding does not work

  Hi all

  I have a V3 WRT160N and DMZ or Portforwarding do not work.

  I tried on locally

  WAN_PC-> WAN - PORT-> WRT160N V3-> LOCAL - PORT-> LOCAL_PC

  The WAN_PC has a static IP 192.168.1.2, subnet 255.255.255.0

  The WAN PORT has a static IP 192.168.1.1, subnet 255.255.255.0

  ON the WRT160N V3, I set up a DMZ on 192.168.0.100.and off the firewall.

  On the LOCAL_PC (192.168.0.100:8888) is an Apache

  So when I type 192.168.1.1:8888 on the WAN_PC I get NOOO the Apache on 192.168.0.100:8888 Web site?

  WHY??????????????

  Please correct me if I'm wrong. My understanding of your installation, it is that you have a computer connected to the internet port of the router and another computer connected to the router's ethernet port? Is this correct? You don't have a modem for internet connection or something like that? If you can post here a diagram that will be better. Thank you.

• With the help of ASA 5510 L2L and VPN L2TP

  I would let my remote users access to all resources bhind the ASA and my remote branches.

  Here's my setup.  ASA5510 as a hub to the data center.

  172.21.x.x of internal network directly connected

  DMZ directly connected 172.22.1.x.x

  L2L branch1 VPN 10.47.x.x

  L2L branch2 VPN 10.47.y.x

  172.21.y.x remote users L2TP Windows Client

  I can access my internal resources related to the ASA but not the DMZ or branch offices. I need injection road routing and reverse?

  You also need to configure crossed.  http://goo.GL/vLqAR

• RVS4000 Port forwarding

  I have a RVS4000 put in place as my internet router/gateway to a client of 75 MS Server 2003 network. All network devices receive a static IP address. I used Port Forwarding and Port Range Forwarding on the RVS4000 to allow remote desktop connection to outside network to specific clients within the network. I have used all available space on the RVS4000 software for the seizure of the Port addresses and still needed to connect multiple users more. I bought a second RVS4000 and connected to the first through one of the lan ports, then the network through another lan port.  I have forwarded a range of addresses of the first router to another and then used the second router port forwarding and port forwarding tables range to the IP addresses of each client. Everything seems to be set up correctly and I can access both routers on the network, the individual port forwarding and the addresses of forwarding port on the first router range still work, but the transmitted address range appear not to be through to the second router and then to the customers. What I am doing wrong?

  I think the WRVS4400N has an IP based ACL that you can do to open the ports of the PC. It has a capacity of 1 G more but I don't know if the ACL can handle 25-50 PCs. I suggest you try to contact CISCO technical support so that you can be well informed of the router you need to make it work.

• Cisco ASA 5500 Series 4-Port GE SSM

  Currently, we have 2 asa 5510 firewall and need to add the

  Cisco ASA 5500 Series 4 - Port GE SSM extension module. Can it be added when the device is turned on and running or the firewall must be turned off to install the plug-in?

  Hello

  You could try to ask this question of the team of firewall, as this page from the community for the physical security and video surveillance.  The team of firewall is located here:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/community/NetPro/security/firewall

• Cisco ASA 5510 + license + AIP - SSM

  Hello.

  I have this box.

  I have a few questions about it.

  (1) I'll be able to update the firmware (from 8.2 to 8.3 or greater for example) without smarnet for ASA 5510? And what can not do without smartnet?

  (2) I have only AIP-SSM-10 module this ASA 5510. is there a smartnet, too? And when I buy only one module is it build in a subscription for 1 year for the signatures of the IPS?

  (3) if I have the Cisco ASA 5510 base license, my IPS on AIP-SSM-10 will work?

  (4) as I foresee in a purchase of the year a 5510 more with the same module and mount ther of failover. I really need license Security more than failover (active / standby)? For active/active, I know I need one, Yes?

  Please help me.

  (1) you must Smartnet in order to download the software from the download from cisco.com site.

  (2) Yes, there is also a smartnet for the AIP module. Module AIP does not come with one year subscription, but you can ask for a demo license.

  (3) Yes, the basic license is OK for the AIP module.

  (4) Yes, you would need license security more on the two ASA to be able to run any type of failover on ASA5510.

  Hope that answers your questions.

• ASA 5510 with AIP SSM-10

  I'm new to network administration and our company has an ASA 5510 with and map AIP SSM-10. On the interface ASA when I try to load Intrusion detection, he said the following:

  "For IPS 5.1 (1) S205.0, use the link below to access the IPS Device Manager." (If the SSM management IP address or the port is translated, replace them accordingly in the below URL). IPS 6.0.1 or above will be fully interated ASDM. »

  Unfortunately, no URL is displayed below this message and there is no documentation in the company that owns this configuration. Is there a way to reset the AIP without resetting the ASA? How can I find the IP address to be able to configure it?

  The ASA CLI, you will be able to check the IP address of the AIP module:

  view the details of the module

  It will show you the ip address of mgmt of the module, and you can https to the IP address of your PC.

• Cisco Anyconnect/WebVPN license for ASA 5510

  Hello

  Someone could please check the licenses for ASA 5510 attachment and let me know. We currently have ASA 5510 with basic license. According to the table attached under VPN sessions, he mentions that "250 combined SESSIONS IPSec and WebVPN" and to "Max box of WebVPN Session" it is mentioned that 2nd meeting, exceeding that we must buy license optional webvpn. While we the 250 combined license for IPSec and webVPN. We must purchase additional anyconnect license to set up remote access for users who want to use the internal resources from outside the network. OrElse, we don't have to purchase license and can configure webvpn/anyconnect of existing combined license existing users basic ASA license? Waiting for your response. Thank you.

  You are welcome.

  1 Yes

  2 AnyConnect requires no Java, but it can he use when connecting to one AnyConnect SSL VPN client and launch the Web browser option start Java-based. There was a bug with the AnyConnect old versions had later who should have addresses. You also have the option to launch via IE and using ActiveX or simply throw AnyConnect directly - neither of these two methods require Java.

  Here is a document TAC on the Java questions if you want more details.

  Please take a moment to note the useful messages and mark your answers questions.