Same colours appear different on two work plans of the same file!

From a model of Illustrator, I create a trifold brochure. I used the work same exact and copied and pasted page 1 (outside) on page two (inside). The colours are pantone and the document is set to CMYK. But when I export to PDF, for some reason, on page two colors appear brighter on the screen colors on page 1. I am totally confused, I checked and double-checked the color in place, used my dropper, everything. When I print on a model on my ink jet, everything seems to print perfectly - all colors are the same. I'm terrified to send this to print! Help!

Page 1:

Screen Shot 2016-03-24 at 6.31.18 PM.png

Page 2:

Screen Shot 2016-03-24 at 6.31.34 PM.png

Mac OS X.X.5 Yosemite, Illustrator CC

When you say "a page and not another", you mean different documents or even different document plans work?

If the same document, try this first: open the color chart > select all unused colors, and delete them. Then, open the swatch (s) of remaining tones and make sure they are all CMYK.

Then select all and flatten transparency. At this point, you should have a file have fairly clean. In addition, if you have used any fake envelope but did not yet develop, you can have an element RGB hidden somewhere in there.

But the effects can be a problem. I never use one of the 'Photoshop effects' (binary). Dangerous stuff if directs you to a printing press.

Tags: Illustrator

Similar Questions

  • Layer mask groups converted from work plans to the size of the artboard in older versions of Photoshop

    I wanted to start this post as an idea, but I couldn't choose communities (it wouldn't let me), so here it is posted...

    ----

    Just came across this with a customer...

    I use for a mobile design project work plans, and I just got a screenshot with some texts asking why among work plans were really great. Way bigger than a phone. (I'm under NDA and cannot post the screenshot, but imagine there are a lot of iPhone size work plans and two of them seem to be at a right angle)

    I opened the file and on my end, everything is the right size. Remembering the weeks ago to tell the customer that they need to update their version of Photoshop for all this work correctly, I have take a look at the screenshot and see that they are on CC2014 - none of the work plans.

    What I'm asking here, is that, since we have data, plans of work are objects of a defined size and 'alive', why not just use these data to hide layer groups at the opening of the PSD / PSB (PSB in my case) in older versions of Photoshop?

    It could save you a TON of hassle and confusion.

    Hi Zack,

    High level to your query response is: no, there is no conduct business case for a general solution to what you are suggesting. So I don't see what is happening.

    I say that as someone who likes to give back and forth and backward compatibility.

    There are two parts of the problem that you raise. They are related and somewhat intertwined.

    1. Having the version previous (2014) do something reasonable with the data from the version the most recent (2015). Either the old version should be taught on the most recent data so it can make a decision about what to do, or the newer version must put additional data in the file format for consumption by the older version.
    2. Back and forth between versions. As you say, a much more difficult problem. In fact, we do a good job of that today. But we must be sure that whatever we do for (1) not to damage and back the wrong way.

    Let's be very clear: 2014 will not be touched, except for critical bugs, absolutely. And even before 2015 is released, it would have not been corrected to make it behave better with work plans. There is no way that I could see what is happening. So all we have done for better backward compatibility had to be entirely done within 2015.

    For the round trip, the general problem is something like this: we want to 2014 to read an object that has properties of 2015, he does not understand. While we might learn ch to keep these properties as opaque property, must also have rules for when these properties are not valid and thrown on the floor. Probably, if the object is changed. But not always. And sometimes when another object parent is changed. And so on. Right now, we destroy them unknown content from their reading in the old version. Make us and record what we understand. As a user, you receive an alert telling you that we are do this. It's the safest thing to do.

    There are special cases where a developer can see an opportunity to preserve a level of backward compatibility and back and forth. We try to do if we believe that it is safe. But this scenario happens only occasionally.

    In the case of work plans, made us really think about this: If we added a mask to the group for backward compatibility, it should do something with this mask reading around 2015. And what would happen if the user edited this mask in 2014 and opened upward in 2015 - and who edited mask do not align with the structures of the artboard? Things started to get dark quickly. We started to see traps. The workflow together to sheath special round trip had to be tested and verified. The cost was rising and this expense must be filtered through a cost/value trade-off. And then what happens when we add a new property to the structure of work plan? At these efforts for nothing?

    So we compromised with what you have today. Work plans become groups in 2014. The Group and the layer structure remains intact. Doesn't secretly add us and remove masks for the round trip. You can safely change the groups to your heart's content. When return you this document in 2015, you redo the work plans of the groups. Was not clear and safe way to do more than that given the time that we had.

    Take a step back and think about your problem, it doesn't seem to be a value to a script that converts group work plans + layer masks for your workflow to have your documents that is consumed by the customers of 2014. This would be carried out in 2015 because she would need understand the work plans. And maybe vice versa from 2014 to 2015, assuming that the documents were not published in a hostile way. We're not likely to write such a script as a generic tool, but someone competent with script might be able to do this.

    More that I intend to write, but hopefully, it gives you additional insight in the compromises that we have faced.

  • Is it possible to resize all work plans at the time the way that you used to be able to do in the configuration of document?

    I have a document with 20 work plans. When I resize a that only changes that are. I'm in CS5. Is it possible to resize all work plans at the time the way that you used to be able to do in the configuration of document? Thank you very much!

    Wade_Zimmerman wrote:

    It's a good script but t vrry does not resize some plans of work and not wouldn't

    @ Wade

    You can recode and a confirm in the loop to determine if you want to resize the work plan current in the iteration of the loop, if no installation then jump her, if yes then prompt for sizes and move forward. Then you can resize regardless of those that you wish as such, some and not others. You can even distinguish with each confirm and ask what work targeted plan by displaying its name. I tested this approach and it seems to work ok, but not super stylish, of course, because if you have tons of work plans, it would be a large number of guests/entry. You could lesson prompts by combining the width/height in a single guest. But then again, even at this time sound just as effective to resize each manually via the window of work plans, probably the same amount of work/time user input processing and the targeting of individual work plans. You could perhaps also create script window for multiple entry for plans of work desired, may be based on the selected and build your dialogue window accordingly, I suppose that, at this time, it would provide a more effective approach for this kind of thing that you seem to be describing.

    But that all said that we would be well beyond the original request that CarlosCanto already so generously filled. He might have some comments on your comments.

  • work plans and the origin

    Hi, I am looking to attract some objects on fixed positions on work plans by first defining the origin of the document to the top - left of the artboard. However, this seems to work for some of the work plans, but not for all.

    Example code:

    #target illustrator
    
    // create artboards
    var CurrentDoc = app.documents.add ( DocumentColorSpace.CMYK, 595, 841, 12, DocumentArtboardLayout.GridByRow, 50, 6); 
    var artboardRef = CurrentDoc.artboards;
    
    // loopt through all artboards
    for ( var i = 0; i < artboardRef.length; i++ ) 
      {
       // set page and ruler origin
       var RulerLeft = artboardRef[i].artboardRect[0];
       var RulerTop  = artboardRef[i].artboardRect[1] ;
       CurrentDoc.rulerOrigin = [RulerLeft,RulerTop];
       CurrentDoc.pageOrigin  = [RulerLeft,RulerTop];
      
       //add text to artboard
       var cTextRef = CurrentDoc.textFrames.add();
       cTextRef.textRange.characterAttributes.textFont=app.textFonts.getByName("Verdana"); 
       cTextRef.textRange.characterAttributes.size = 27;
       cTextRef.contents = "ArtBoard: "+ (i+1);
       cTextRef.left = +55;
       cTextRef.top = -64;
       redraw();
      } 
    

    8 of the 12 work plans get the text at the right position (but not in the right order when I look at the range of work plans). Text for 4 work plans is placed completely outside all work plans.

    Any help is appreciated,

    Michel

    A mathematical operation is Ok, no need to set the origin.

    #target illustrator
    
    // create artboards
    var CurrentDoc = app.documents.add ( DocumentColorSpace.CMYK, 595, 841, 12, DocumentArtboardLayout.GridByRow, 50, 6);
    var artboardRef = CurrentDoc.artboards;
    
    // loopt through all artboards
    for ( var i = 0; i < artboardRef.length; i++ )
      {
       // set page and ruler origin
       var RulerLeft = artboardRef[i].artboardRect[0];
       var RulerTop  = artboardRef[i].artboardRect[1] ;
       //CurrentDoc.rulerOrigin = [RulerLeft,RulerTop];
       //CurrentDoc.pageOrigin  = [RulerLeft,RulerTop];
    
       //add text to artboard
       var cTextRef = CurrentDoc.textFrames.add();
       cTextRef.textRange.characterAttributes.textFont=app.textFonts.getByName("Verdana");
       cTextRef.textRange.characterAttributes.size = 27;
       cTextRef.contents = "ArtBoard: "+ (i+1);
       cTextRef.left = RulerLeft +55;
       cTextRef.top = RulerTop -64;
       redraw();
      }
    
  • Updated to the new Photoshop CC 2015: work plan and the background are both white I can't see any outline. Will not change when I try to get a different background color.

    This seems almost elementary but I tried everything literally, the only thing I can think is that this is a bug.

    When I'm working on work plans, they are white and the background is white, so I don't quite see the outline. I tried to change the background color to dark gray or any other color, but nothing works. I restarted my computer, the software, everything. Nothing works. It only happens to me, everyone in my company isn't the problem. We checked out the contrast on my computer and it's all good. I had two different designers tinker around with it and they say it must be a bug because they have tried everything they can and I also.

    Now I simply add a grey box dark to my work plans so I can see the sketch, but it's really annoying, I have to do, especially since I work with Photoshop 4 hours per day.

    You must set your GPU options in preferences to something other than "Bacic."

  • Cannot connect two work spaces in the same browser window

    Hello
    Happy holidays to all. I have problem to identify two workspaces (associated with two diagrams) in a browser with two tabs in the browser. The situation as the following:

    -Using Internet Explorer 7.0 or Firefox
    -Login in A work space, associated with the AA scheme. (connect successfully)
    -Then, click New tab in the same browser window, log in the workspace B, associated with the schema BB. (connect successfully)
    - The tab of connection of space one was closed (kicks) automatically.

    If I open two separate browsers, I can connect a work space in the window of a browser and connect another workspace in a separate window, not tab.

    Why? Is somewhere, I missed setting or configuration for APEX? All advice is greatly appreciated.

    Candice

    You're right, you can't do that.

    Try using Firefox chrome and one for the other.

    Tyler Muth
    http://tylermuth.WordPress.com
    [Oracle security application: development of secure database and Middleware environments | http://sn.im/aos.book]

  • Download the work plan of the selected item

    I have the script where I select objects on the artboard multiple, but I can't seem to get advice art activates the selected item. Is this possible?

    each work plan is a text element and I that they in the same position on each of their own work plans they are already a. now it fits them all to a work plan. Here's what I have so far

    doc = app.activeDocument;
    for(i = 0; i < selection.length; i++){
        var firstItemPosition = doc.selection[0].position;
        doc.selection[i].position = firstItemPosition;
        var activeArtboardIndex = doc.artboards.getActiveArtboardIndex();
        alert(activeArtboardIndex);
     }
    

    .. .or with a "brute force" approach

    // return each selected item's artboard index
    // carlos canto 09/28/2013
    // http://forums.adobe.com/message/5721205?tstart=0#5721205
    
    var idoc = app.activeDocument;
    app.userInteractionLevel = UserInteractionLevel.DONTDISPLAYALERTS;
    var selec = idoc.selection;
    
    var sel = [];
    for(i = 0; i < selec.length; i++)
        sel.push(selec[i]);
    
    for(j = 0; j < sel.length; j++) {
        idoc.selection = null;
        alert('selection ' + j + objectArboardIindex (sel[j]));
    }
    
    for(j = 0; j < sel.length; j++)
        sel[j].selected = true;
    
    app.userInteractionLevel = UserInteractionLevel.DISPLAYALERTS; 
    
    function objectArboardIindex (obj) {
        var idoc = app.activeDocument;
        for(i=0; i		   
  • Can I add more than 100 work plans into a single file in Adobe Illustrator CS5

    Hello everyone,

    I have a single file that contains 100 different work plans. I need to add more than 50. Is this possible. When I tried to add the new work plan, the "New artboard" button becomes inactive and the "New artboard" option in the menu popup is disabled. I can do something in this situation?

    Best regards

    No. 100 plans work is the limit. You will need to pursue multiple files.

  • Why won't save my work plans in a PDF file?

    When I try to save as a PDF file, two columns of the artboard to save.

    I downloaded my illustrator files in this link.

    Help, please!

    http://www.box.com/s/7e7f174426d346180974

    The file does not contain the work plan you need. What you need, it's a work plan for each inside and outside that surrounds the other 3 work plans.

  • The Extract function does not work for work plans in the last update CC?

    The functionality of the extract stops when I have a PSD with work plans. Does anyone else have this problem?

    I am pleased to say that work plans are now supported in excerpt on the site of creative cloud. Let us know how to find you and if there is anything we can improve!

  • How to find no work plans and the lines of a doc. ?

    Hello

    could someone tell me how to count the number of work plans and existing lines in the document?

    the CS4 API can do?

    I couldn't find all the suites do.

    Please help I'm stuck.

    Thank you

    DeepAlone.

    The number of work plans is easy: AICropAreaSuite::GetCount() in AICropArea.h. The number of lines? It's more complicated, since there is no ownership of it. You figure, however, using the methods of AICropArea to join the rectangles (see struct above) of each work plan (or "box frame" as they are called in the nomenclature of the CS4 API). There is no guarantee that they are in lines, of course, since they can be moved. You can take a stab but looking at the top & bottom and see if a bunch of them line up; which would give you meaning to all the lines are there is they are in lines.

  • Snap the work plan to the dimensions of the object?

    I have irregular (as a logo). Is there a way get a new work plan to shrink automatically to the bounding box of this object?

    Yes,

    Select your object, double-click the tool work plan, this will open the diolog the artboard Options, use preset in the menu drop down and select Fit artboard of Art selected.

    This will make the art Board to the size of your choice.

  • moviescript works not when the flash file is on stage

    My keydown script on will not work as long as I have a swf file on the stage that has a text entry field in the first image, which I use to set a variable in the swf file.

    Even if I go to another image of the SWF without the input of text field, I can't yet use keydown to the Director.

    If you know the tricks of jargon that would be great.

    Or plan B would be to set the variable in the Director and send it to a swf that has no text entry field.  But I'm not sure how to pass variables to a swf file.

    And the jargon that I saw online does not work for my swf named 'digitalclock' that has a variable "hours":

    Sprite () 'digitalclock'). setVariable (hours, 1,)

    Or plan A would be if you know clocks to digital reading to the Director who may have their departure hours and minutes set by the end-user.

    Thank you

    There are many possible solutions.

    Here is a demonstration that is too simplistic.

  • Constant error cluster appears different in two places on a block diagram

    I am a newbie to LabVIEW. I took Core 1 and 2 and Vision and I did not com on this before.

    The right image is of course a constant of cluster of error used in the block diagram to create a cluster of error and it lead to an error on the terminal. As far as I can tell the left image is the same thing, but why is it different? The causes of different appearance raises a concern that there is a difference in behavior that I don't understand. LabVIEW help season both are constants for error. When I create a new constant of error, it always appear as the image on the right above.  I was not able to create something similar to the image on the left.

    Could someone please confirm what the image on the left on a blck diagram?

    Thank you

    Bill

    The left image is a mistake of cluster control. He has a presence on front panel and can be set via the front panel or by a property node or a local variable. The image on the right is a cluster of error constant. It is a static value.

  • Work plan for the clean edges of culture

    I read this post: Re: reframe it.   And I tried to follow the directions to clean the edges of overflow out of my art project.  I have to do something wrong.  Furthermore, what is meant by 'thrill '?  I am very new to learn Illustrator so many things I don't understand.  Is this supposed to be done after you have everything?  Or only the paths that are outside the lines?   I can use all the help you can provide, if all goes well with the terms that I can understand.

    Thank you

    Thank you.   I found the answer here. Re: why it will not cut back on the Web

Maybe you are looking for