Security level Confusion of PIX.

Similar Questions

• Security level 0-100

  If the Pix inside interface is configured for security, value of 100, while that for the external interface, a value of 0 security:

  (1) what does the 0 and 100 mean? Any number between the two, for example of 30, 50, 70, 90?

  (2) in terms of inbounding and outbounding, what does the 0 and 100 mean? I think I understand, all the outbounding is allowed; The inbounding from the external network, is allowed to pass through the external interface, but none is allowed through the interface - it is home to this correct understanding?

  Thank you for helping.

  Scott

  the number indicates the security level, highest is 100 and the lowest is 0.

  default PIX has inside the interface set to 100; whereas the external interface is set to 0. When you configure the dmz interfaces, you can assign any number between the two.

  with pix v6.x, once configured nat/global statement, all the traffic of the higher security level to lower the security level is allowed. that is not acl is required.

  Furthermore, traffic intended for the highest level of safety at a lower level of security is not allowed, unless there is an acl in place (usually with the static instructions as well).

  It is common to say that the default pix allows all outgoing traffic. in fact, it is more accurate to say that default pix allows all traffic security level higher to lower security level (for these pix has more than 2 interfaces).

• Possible to assign security levels in the VPN tunnel?

  Currently I have a PIX-2-ASA VPN tunnel works without any problem.

  Here's my problem, I want to know if there is a way to configure one side of the tunnel as an interface "drop safety" of sorts. I want only one side to be able to open traffic.

  ACLs are not useful on one side at least as return traffic generated on the random ports. I want only one side to answer Insider sessions, but not be able to start a session on its own.

  Since the terminiates of VPN tunnel on the external interface, the security level of each side is '0 '. If all traffic behind on part and on the other the tunnel can innitate sessions.

  Any ideas?

  Thank you

  Edit: One side is a v6.3 (5) of PIX515E, another ASA5510 v7.2 (1)

  Hello

  On your ASA, you can specify the following 3 connection types in your crypto card:

  1 crypto map set type of connection are created only

  2 crypto map set connection type response only

  3 crypto map set-type of two-way connection

  This should allow you to control what end can initiate the tunnel.

  Concerning

  Pradeep

• security levels

  Hello
  
  I have a confusion in security levels.
  
  How many types it was?
  
  Everyone please help.
  
  Thank you
  Lacouture.

  i restricted user1 by adding filter on col1.
  
  This is data level security.
  
  if i restrict user1 on particular objects then it is object level security.
  
  right??
  
  Now, Data level security can be done only on rpd , right?
  
  Object level security can be done both in rpd as well as presentation services, right?
  

  Yes Rey, you are right...

  Award points and end the debate, if your question is answered or mark if she was...

  See you soon,.
  Aravind

• need help to understand the ACLs and security levels

  I use static NAT (nat (inside, outside) static interface) between a single host inside for the DHCP address used on the external interface. The inside interface has the security level of 100, and the outside has the security level of 0. My understanding is that for connections with State, I wouldn't need the ACL. However, nothing works unless I set up an ACL (for example, right now I have a global allow rule). What Miss me?

  Even if you 'dormant', but you still have the access list applied on the interface which, by default, will have the "deny ip any any" implicitly at the end of the access eventhough list you have existing line "inactive".

  To remove access from the inside of the interface completely list, you must remove the following line:

  inside_access_out access to the interface inside group

• What is the security level of a signing of pdf from Adobe? How is difficult to break? It is similar to a md5?

  What is the security level of a signing of pdf from Adobe? How is difficult to break? It is similar to a md5?

  Software can crack the document.

• Security level limited access to high security

  Dear all,

  I have something that I need your help it clarify for me; for reasons of tests outside NAT in PIX, I placed a host on the external interface of my FW PIX and another on the inside interface. We'll call inside host (Host: 172.16.1.178) and outside (Host B: 192.168.1.96).

  I then applied:

  NAT (inside) 0 0 0 and

  NAT (outside) 0 0 0 outside

  orders to have two subnets appear to others with their original IP addresses. When ping from host B to host, no response is received and a 305005 syslog message (no translation group not found for ICMP src outdoors: 192.168.1.96 dst inside: 172.16.1.178)... However, when ping from host A to host B with the original B IP host, a response is received successfully. After this, lead to confusion if I try again to ping from host B to host, things work this time without errors. (Note: ICMP is applied both way).

  Applying clear XLATE, again! Looks like the PIX doesn't sends the request of host B to host A unless there is a previous, established session from the host through the PIX.

  Does anyone have an explanation for what's going on? Is their someone who have experienced something like this before?

  Know your opinion.

  Thank you

  Haitham

  You are using nat 0 (identity nat) that does not allow two-way communication, UNLESS the host location to the interface high security initiates the connection.

  You can try the following:

  public static 172.16.1.178 (Interior, exterior) 172.16.1.178 netmask 255.255.255.255

  Which allows inside the host to be 'translated' to the outside and allow the host located on the untrsuted start the communication itself (will be seen with the same IP address)

  more information:

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/iaabu/PIX/pix_sw/v_63/cmdref/s.htm#wp1026694

  Franco Zamora

• How do you define security levels internet?

  I can't find a menu that allows you to assign the internet security at different levels.

  It is an option of Internet Explorer, there is no equivalent in Firefox.

• Prévilige level of Cisco Pix

  Hello

  I wanted to give access to the firewall based on the privilege level pix. By default, it is at level 15. Then, I created a database of aaa

  AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol

  Console Telnet AAA authentication local

  AAA authentication enable console local

  Then I created a username as

  username password for the privileged comments 9

  By default there is no privilege survey for 9. Then to meant to test, I added only the privilege to see the single clock, as the

  privileged view level 9 control clock

  After that that I'm connected using the host account both telnet and enable but I could do all the task as a person with access to level 15. Can advice me how to set the level of privilege based on users and restrict their access to the firewall. As guest connect you can see that the version of the pix and should not be able to go the config t and any static or access list.

  Thanks in advance

  Here is the url that speaks exactly that.

  http://www.Cisco.com/warp/public/110/pix_command.shtml

  PL. see 'Privilege of understanding settings' on this url

• Confusion of PIX OS bug 'CSCdx90840 '.

  The "CSCdx90840" bug was discovered in the versions '(3.105) 6.1, 6.2 (1.104)' and has been fixed in versions "6.3 (1), 6.2 (2.100), 6.1 (4.100), 6.0 (4.100) and 6.3 (0.100)", according to the results of the search tool Bug.

  If you examine the 6.2 (2) PIX OS Release Notes (below), you will see that this bug is always under the warnings 'open '.

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/iaabu/PIX/pix_sw/v_62/Relnotes/pixrn622.htm#88643

  Anyone out there who can help me to empty a little bit these things?

  Also, how to check version of "6.2"? (2,100) Or should I say, how I correctly check/interpret this format of version number.

  Thanks in advance.

  If the bug has been fixed in 6.2 (2.100) then it is NOT fixed in 6.2 (2), the Release Notes are correct.

  Anything with an ou.101 numero.100 or in the version is called a bail. When a major version gets put on CCO, it'll be just, say, 6.2 (2). From here the developers will continue to fix bugs of old and difficulty of new bugs found in this new version. As they so they will create temporary versions, the first draft of 6.2 (2) will be 6.2 (2.100), it will usually contain some bug fixes. Then they will create 6.2 (2.101) based on 6.2 (2.100), this will contain some bug fixes. This continues until at some point, they decide to release 6.2 (3), the next major version, this table will contain all bug fixes fixed in the interim versions of 6.2(2.1xx).

  Drafts are not on CCEL, but can be given to customers hit a specific bug by the TAC. There are currently a lot of customers who are running interim versions, although we always suggest their upgrade to the next major version when it comes out.

  So, for your bug, it was first set at 6.2 (2,100), which was built AFTER the 6.2 (2), although it is based directly on it and just contains a few bug fixes (in fact I just checked and it contains 10 bug fixes, whose CSCdx90840 is one of them).

  Hope I have not confused you even more.

• Security level CSA 4.5 setting based on the State of the user

  It is of course possible to toggle the guardrail on the graphical interface through a rule (in the operating system - based permissions policy).

  But, it is possible to define or allow the service to be stopped is based on a State of the user? I can't see how allow/disable it in all areas...

  I have a Local Administrator and a State of NO Local Admin user who work very well with the Modules, but I can't find a way to attach it to the level of safety...

  In the end, I want to be able to affect security low switch, but only if connected as a LocalAdmin...

  See you soon

  As far as I know, you would do this by creating different strategies for each different user state and then using user status option in each strategy to differentiate the rules applied

• OBIEE 12 c data security level

  Hello

  What is the best solution to implement security at the level of the data as we are not able to view our newly created in RPD application role.

  TIA

  I've created a couple of application roles in EM, but they are not reflected in the RPD.

  When I opened the RPD online, I can't add application roles it no more.

• Security level 0 filter

  So, I would create a security filter preventing write access through all the dimensions at the higher levels. In other words, I want users to only be able to lock and to send zero.
  
  Can I use several functions of @LevMbrs () in a single line for this? Or is it better to create a separate line for each dimension? I looked at the SER60 and the surroundings of the 9.3.1 documentation and even if I know that I can use multiple members in a row, I don't know about the functions. In addition, I don't know what is be the best practice in this situation.
  
  Thanks for your help.

  You need to do it on a single line if it's on several line, you probably won't get the results you want

  Well actually two lines to be able to read the whole (or part of it) database and the second to be able to write in the desired intersection.

• Profile of custom security HR with assignment to the security level?

  Hi all
  
  I posted something similar in the HRMS forum, but after more thought, I think it's better done on this forum.
  
  Based on your experience you don't know if it's possible for a custom security profile HR use the assignment level security when it is used to report data through discoverer. Currently I am able to get my custom security profile to limit the data returned in Discoverer to a particular level, but if a person has more than 1 active, both are returned, when only 1 award is actually on my terms. I went from back to basics and you can see that this problem is still there even when I set the following simple condition in the custom security profile:
  
  ASSIGNMENT.assignment_id = '14444'
  
  With the above in place, 2 assignments for this person are always returned. I also tried checking the 'Restrict on individual assignments' option without a bit of luck. When HR above security profile is assigned a responsibility, which calls the form people & assignments, only the one active assignment is returned which is correct. Therefore, it must be something related to discoverer, my custom used views etc...
  
  Someone at - it ideas?
  
  Thank you
  
  Lance

  Update-> I think I have found the problem.

  The point of view PER_ASSIGNMENTS_F, making our discoverer HR report are based on, does not include security at the level of assignments (Note ID 419357.1). You can work around this problem either manually apply security (by using HR_SECURITY. SHOW_RECORD with the appropriate setting to indicate the level of transfer security to be used) or by using the view (exit Family Pack K) PER_ASSIGNMENTS_F2.

  The only differences between the 2 views are shown below:

  per_assignments_f

       WHERE DECODE (hr_security.view_all,
                    'Y', 'TRUE',
                    hr_security.show_record ('PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F',
                                             paa.assignment_id,
                                             paa.person_id,
                                             paa.assignment_type
                                            )
                   ) = 'TRUE' 
  

  PER_ASSIGNMENTS_F2

       WHERE DECODE (hr_security.view_all,
                    'Y', 'TRUE',
                    hr_security.show_record ('PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F',
                                             paa.assignment_id,
                                             paa.person_id,
                                             paa.assignment_type,
                                             'Y'
                                            )
                   ) = 'TRUE' 
  

  Hope this saves time and helps someone else.

  Thank you

  Lance

• Member migration security level

  I use file system option to migrate the planning application Life Cycle Management.
  
  However the security at the level of the members is not have migrated.
  
  I am able to export all the objects, other than the safety of Dimension members.
  
  Did I miss something...
  
  Please suggest...

  Hello

  Have you tried to export only the users on its own without anything else, you should get a file named users.xml produced.
  Have you tried it on another application, have you checked to see if there's anything in SharedServices_LCM.log

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/