Member migration security level

I use file system option to migrate the planning application Life Cycle Management.

However the security at the level of the members is not have migrated.

I am able to export all the objects, other than the safety of Dimension members.

Did I miss something...

Please suggest...

Hello

Have you tried to export only the users on its own without anything else, you should get a file named users.xml produced.
Have you tried it on another application, have you checked to see if there's anything in SharedServices_LCM.log

See you soon

John
http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

Tags: Business Intelligence

Similar Questions

  • need help to understand the ACLs and security levels

    I use static NAT (nat (inside, outside) static interface) between a single host inside for the DHCP address used on the external interface. The inside interface has the security level of 100, and the outside has the security level of 0. My understanding is that for connections with State, I wouldn't need the ACL. However, nothing works unless I set up an ACL (for example, right now I have a global allow rule). What Miss me?

    Even if you 'dormant', but you still have the access list applied on the interface which, by default, will have the "deny ip any any" implicitly at the end of the access eventhough list you have existing line "inactive".

    To remove access from the inside of the interface completely list, you must remove the following line:

    inside_access_out access to the interface inside group

  • Possible to assign security levels in the VPN tunnel?

    Currently I have a PIX-2-ASA VPN tunnel works without any problem.

    Here's my problem, I want to know if there is a way to configure one side of the tunnel as an interface "drop safety" of sorts. I want only one side to be able to open traffic.

    ACLs are not useful on one side at least as return traffic generated on the random ports. I want only one side to answer Insider sessions, but not be able to start a session on its own.

    Since the terminiates of VPN tunnel on the external interface, the security level of each side is '0 '. If all traffic behind on part and on the other the tunnel can innitate sessions.

    Any ideas?

    Thank you

    Edit: One side is a v6.3 (5) of PIX515E, another ASA5510 v7.2 (1)

    Hello

    On your ASA, you can specify the following 3 connection types in your crypto card:

    1 crypto map set type of connection are created only

    2 crypto map set connection type response only

    3 crypto map set-type of two-way connection

    This should allow you to control what end can initiate the tunnel.

    Concerning

    Pradeep

  • Security level 0-100

    If the Pix inside interface is configured for security, value of 100, while that for the external interface, a value of 0 security:

    (1) what does the 0 and 100 mean? Any number between the two, for example of 30, 50, 70, 90?

    (2) in terms of inbounding and outbounding, what does the 0 and 100 mean? I think I understand, all the outbounding is allowed; The inbounding from the external network, is allowed to pass through the external interface, but none is allowed through the interface - it is home to this correct understanding?

    Thank you for helping.

    Scott

    the number indicates the security level, highest is 100 and the lowest is 0.

    default PIX has inside the interface set to 100; whereas the external interface is set to 0. When you configure the dmz interfaces, you can assign any number between the two.

    with pix v6.x, once configured nat/global statement, all the traffic of the higher security level to lower the security level is allowed. that is not acl is required.

    Furthermore, traffic intended for the highest level of safety at a lower level of security is not allowed, unless there is an acl in place (usually with the static instructions as well).

    It is common to say that the default pix allows all outgoing traffic. in fact, it is more accurate to say that default pix allows all traffic security level higher to lower security level (for these pix has more than 2 interfaces).

  • Security level Confusion of PIX.

    Hi guys,.

    I did some Internet research to learn more about the function of security level of this Pix. But in no vain.

    You guys can advise me on what this security level 100 or 0 is all about? Do I have to set all the my controls to 100 all out 0 inside? If this is the case, my internal system is unable to access the external network as they are of different security level.

    Last question here. I have a router with 2 ints: fa0/0(connect to isp, 100.100.100.2) and fa0/1(connect to a inside pix, 10.2.1.1). My pix off int address is 10.2.1.2(connect àle routeur de la fa0/1), and ethernet1 address is 192.168.1.1. This router will do a NAT on behalf of my internal network.

    My problem is that I should do a NAT on the PIX to get my 192.168.1.0 network translate 10.2.1.2 If you access the Internet. From there on, the router will translate addresses translated to public addresses reuse its NAT. In this way, it is a double NAT process. This method is feasible? Any other method better other than making a double NAT?

    Please kindly advise me on my 2 doubts. :))

    Thank you much in advance.

    Hello

    Using security levels indicates the relative safety of the interface for the PIX. A level of higher security means that the interface should be treated with a high degree of safety, while a lower security level means that the interface connects to a less reliable network. In general, you can consider your interface LAN internal 100, your DMZ segments as something between 0 and 100 and the interface connected to the internet as 100.

    Devices connected to interfaces of high security can initiate connections to the interfaces of low level of security thanks to the use of 'global' commands and "NAT" - you do not use NAT. For devices in low-security interfaces to communicate with devices in the higher security interfaces, you must allow access via an access list and a static statement.

    In your configuration, if the NAT router already there is absolutely no reason NAT on the PIX as well. Just set up your router NAT source addresses the 192.168.1.0/24 and you should be fine.

    On your PIX, configure the following:

    NAT (inside) 0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 0 0

    That tells the PIX not to NAT these addresses.

    Hope that help - rate pls post if it does.

    Paresh

  • What is the security level of a signing of pdf from Adobe? How is difficult to break? It is similar to a md5?

    What is the security level of a signing of pdf from Adobe? How is difficult to break? It is similar to a md5?

    Software can crack the document.

  • Migration of level diagram GG?

    Our scheme has thousands of tables/indexes, etc.

    Can I use GG to migrate schema level?

    Yes, you can

    Please take a look here for some ideas

    http://gavinsoorma.com/2010/02/Oracle-GoldenGate-Tutorial-4-performing-initial-data-load/

    Be sure to mark your answers questions once you get your answer in order to clean up the forum.

    Greetings,
    NACEUR

  • Migrate security of Essbase 7.1.5 to 11.1.2.1

    I'm looking to migrate security for Essbase version 7 application x to 11.1.2.1.
    Someone can tell me what would be the best way to export users, filters etc. of the version 7 x to 11.1.2.1

    We are not upgraded to 9.3.3 or such 11.1.1.3 as recommended by Oracle.We build just in the newer version. However, I still want to use the existing security in version 7 x.

    Thanks in advance.

    You must use the value of column_width ; before using the display filter syntax. It sets the width of the columns that appear in the tables display outputs, for this session MaxL Shell MaxL.

  • security levels

    Hello

    I have a confusion in security levels.

    How many types it was?

    Everyone please help.

    Thank you
    Lacouture.
    i restricted user1 by adding filter on col1.
    
    This is data level security.
    
    if i restrict user1 on particular objects then it is object level security.
    
    right??
    
    Now, Data level security can be done only on rpd , right?
    
    Object level security can be done both in rpd as well as presentation services, right?
    

    Yes Rey, you are right...

    Award points and end the debate, if your question is answered or mark if she was...

    See you soon,.
    Aravind

  • How do you define security levels internet?

    I can't find a menu that allows you to assign the internet security at different levels.

    It is an option of Internet Explorer, there is no equivalent in Firefox.

  • Security level CSA 4.5 setting based on the State of the user

    It is of course possible to toggle the guardrail on the graphical interface through a rule (in the operating system - based permissions policy).

    But, it is possible to define or allow the service to be stopped is based on a State of the user? I can't see how allow/disable it in all areas...

    I have a Local Administrator and a State of NO Local Admin user who work very well with the Modules, but I can't find a way to attach it to the level of safety...

    In the end, I want to be able to affect security low switch, but only if connected as a LocalAdmin...

    See you soon

    As far as I know, you would do this by creating different strategies for each different user state and then using user status option in each strategy to differentiate the rules applied

  • OBIEE 12 c data security level

    Hello

    What is the best solution to implement security at the level of the data as we are not able to view our newly created in RPD application role.

    TIA

    I've created a couple of application roles in EM, but they are not reflected in the RPD.

    When I opened the RPD online, I can't add application roles it no more.

  • #Missing formula Member for upper level members should not aggregate?

    I have some senior level members in an application of ASO that shouldn't have grouped in them values. I seem to remember that there is a formula for Member #Missing I can put each of these members to prevent aggregated values. Does anyone know of such a formula of Member? Thank you

    Add a dummy Member under the parent

    Mother ~ (read only)

    Dummy member ~ (store)

    Ordinary child 1

    Ordinary child 2

    Ordinary child 3

    Just make sure that there is no data loaded against the fake member.

    Concerning

    Celvin

  • Security level 0 filter

    So, I would create a security filter preventing write access through all the dimensions at the higher levels. In other words, I want users to only be able to lock and to send zero.

    Can I use several functions of @LevMbrs () in a single line for this? Or is it better to create a separate line for each dimension? I looked at the SER60 and the surroundings of the 9.3.1 documentation and even if I know that I can use multiple members in a row, I don't know about the functions. In addition, I don't know what is be the best practice in this situation.

    Thanks for your help.

    You need to do it on a single line if it's on several line, you probably won't get the results you want

    Well actually two lines to be able to read the whole (or part of it) database and the second to be able to write in the desired intersection.

  • Migrate security

    While migration cube dev to prod. I can also migrate the security that is in shared services.

    Do I have to create security again

    What would be the best way to do

    can someone help me with this

    Thank you

    If you are using shared services and want to migrate commissioning then which is probably the best route.
    If you use V11, you can also try using LCM.
    Parts of safety, you may be able to use maxl, but that would be extremely limited.

    See you soon

    John
    http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

Maybe you are looking for