Security level 0 filter

Similar Questions

• security levels

  Hello
  
  I have a confusion in security levels.
  
  How many types it was?
  
  Everyone please help.
  
  Thank you
  Lacouture.

  i restricted user1 by adding filter on col1.
  
  This is data level security.
  
  if i restrict user1 on particular objects then it is object level security.
  
  right??
  
  Now, Data level security can be done only on rpd , right?
  
  Object level security can be done both in rpd as well as presentation services, right?
  

  Yes Rey, you are right...

  Award points and end the debate, if your question is answered or mark if she was...

  See you soon,.
  Aravind

• Problems with youtube and security always on filter

  Hello

  I use a s100v virtual wsa. I'm giving you access to YouTube in the strategy of access and politics of decryption via a customized url.

  The site loads, and all right, except the videos require the security to be disable filter do not work.

  No matter how many times I click on and then save the filter always stay on.

  If I disabled the proxy, everything works fine. I use the proxy transparent with port 80 and 443.

  Thank you

  Security in Youtube filter uses Google Safe Search, and in access to the WSA political also has this option.

  If this option is enabled in the WSA under 'Content Filtering' access policy so there will be applied the Safe Search option and keep enable.

  You can check this option under (WSA GUI-> Web Security Manager-access policies >-> Url filtering-> content filtering) and see if you have this turn on or turn off.

• need help to understand the ACLs and security levels

  I use static NAT (nat (inside, outside) static interface) between a single host inside for the DHCP address used on the external interface. The inside interface has the security level of 100, and the outside has the security level of 0. My understanding is that for connections with State, I wouldn't need the ACL. However, nothing works unless I set up an ACL (for example, right now I have a global allow rule). What Miss me?

  Even if you 'dormant', but you still have the access list applied on the interface which, by default, will have the "deny ip any any" implicitly at the end of the access eventhough list you have existing line "inactive".

  To remove access from the inside of the interface completely list, you must remove the following line:

  inside_access_out access to the interface inside group

• Possible to assign security levels in the VPN tunnel?

  Currently I have a PIX-2-ASA VPN tunnel works without any problem.

  Here's my problem, I want to know if there is a way to configure one side of the tunnel as an interface "drop safety" of sorts. I want only one side to be able to open traffic.

  ACLs are not useful on one side at least as return traffic generated on the random ports. I want only one side to answer Insider sessions, but not be able to start a session on its own.

  Since the terminiates of VPN tunnel on the external interface, the security level of each side is '0 '. If all traffic behind on part and on the other the tunnel can innitate sessions.

  Any ideas?

  Thank you

  Edit: One side is a v6.3 (5) of PIX515E, another ASA5510 v7.2 (1)

  Hello

  On your ASA, you can specify the following 3 connection types in your crypto card:

  1 crypto map set type of connection are created only

  2 crypto map set connection type response only

  3 crypto map set-type of two-way connection

  This should allow you to control what end can initiate the tunnel.

  Concerning

  Pradeep

• Security level 0-100

  If the Pix inside interface is configured for security, value of 100, while that for the external interface, a value of 0 security:

  (1) what does the 0 and 100 mean? Any number between the two, for example of 30, 50, 70, 90?

  (2) in terms of inbounding and outbounding, what does the 0 and 100 mean? I think I understand, all the outbounding is allowed; The inbounding from the external network, is allowed to pass through the external interface, but none is allowed through the interface - it is home to this correct understanding?

  Thank you for helping.

  Scott

  the number indicates the security level, highest is 100 and the lowest is 0.

  default PIX has inside the interface set to 100; whereas the external interface is set to 0. When you configure the dmz interfaces, you can assign any number between the two.

  with pix v6.x, once configured nat/global statement, all the traffic of the higher security level to lower the security level is allowed. that is not acl is required.

  Furthermore, traffic intended for the highest level of safety at a lower level of security is not allowed, unless there is an acl in place (usually with the static instructions as well).

  It is common to say that the default pix allows all outgoing traffic. in fact, it is more accurate to say that default pix allows all traffic security level higher to lower security level (for these pix has more than 2 interfaces).

• Security level Confusion of PIX.

  Hi guys,.

  I did some Internet research to learn more about the function of security level of this Pix. But in no vain.

  You guys can advise me on what this security level 100 or 0 is all about? Do I have to set all the my controls to 100 all out 0 inside? If this is the case, my internal system is unable to access the external network as they are of different security level.

  Last question here. I have a router with 2 ints: fa0/0(connect to isp, 100.100.100.2) and fa0/1(connect to a inside pix, 10.2.1.1). My pix off int address is 10.2.1.2(connect àle routeur de la fa0/1), and ethernet1 address is 192.168.1.1. This router will do a NAT on behalf of my internal network.

  My problem is that I should do a NAT on the PIX to get my 192.168.1.0 network translate 10.2.1.2 If you access the Internet. From there on, the router will translate addresses translated to public addresses reuse its NAT. In this way, it is a double NAT process. This method is feasible? Any other method better other than making a double NAT?

  Please kindly advise me on my 2 doubts. :))

  Thank you much in advance.

  Hello

  Using security levels indicates the relative safety of the interface for the PIX. A level of higher security means that the interface should be treated with a high degree of safety, while a lower security level means that the interface connects to a less reliable network. In general, you can consider your interface LAN internal 100, your DMZ segments as something between 0 and 100 and the interface connected to the internet as 100.

  Devices connected to interfaces of high security can initiate connections to the interfaces of low level of security thanks to the use of 'global' commands and "NAT" - you do not use NAT. For devices in low-security interfaces to communicate with devices in the higher security interfaces, you must allow access via an access list and a static statement.

  In your configuration, if the NAT router already there is absolutely no reason NAT on the PIX as well. Just set up your router NAT source addresses the 192.168.1.0/24 and you should be fine.

  On your PIX, configure the following:

  NAT (inside) 0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 0 0

  That tells the PIX not to NAT these addresses.

  Hope that help - rate pls post if it does.

  Paresh

• What is the security level of a signing of pdf from Adobe? How is difficult to break? It is similar to a md5?

  What is the security level of a signing of pdf from Adobe? How is difficult to break? It is similar to a md5?

  Software can crack the document.

• How do you define security levels internet?

  I can't find a menu that allows you to assign the internet security at different levels.

  It is an option of Internet Explorer, there is no equivalent in Firefox.

• Http to https - secure connection (SSL) filter

  Hello

  I got (following the examples available) successfully created and tested my custom http filter. Everything that he has worked as it should... Nice...

  Now - the situation has changed - and I need to do for a secure connection (https) - same domain but on SSL.

  Well my filter has been left out of transformation while talking via secure channel... So I tried to change the domain name complete and added port number - for example:

  HttpFilterRegistry.registerFilter ("www.mydomain.com:443", "com.mycomp.myfilter");

  but that did not help.

  The only thing that comes to mind after I tried the above, is to leave my class of Protocol of implementation of HttpsConnection instead of HttpConnection. I have not tried yet...

  Someone has done this? Is it still feasible? Any other idea?

  Thank you

  Peter

  Unfortunately, this API is designed to allow only http URL filtering. HTTPS URLS because of the extra security were not intentionally included. My apologies for the delay.

  Kind regards

  Mike.

• Security level CSA 4.5 setting based on the State of the user

  It is of course possible to toggle the guardrail on the graphical interface through a rule (in the operating system - based permissions policy).

  But, it is possible to define or allow the service to be stopped is based on a State of the user? I can't see how allow/disable it in all areas...

  I have a Local Administrator and a State of NO Local Admin user who work very well with the Modules, but I can't find a way to attach it to the level of safety...

  In the end, I want to be able to affect security low switch, but only if connected as a LocalAdmin...

  See you soon

  As far as I know, you would do this by creating different strategies for each different user state and then using user status option in each strategy to differentiate the rules applied

• OBIEE 12 c data security level

  Hello

  What is the best solution to implement security at the level of the data as we are not able to view our newly created in RPD application role.

  TIA

  I've created a couple of application roles in EM, but they are not reflected in the RPD.

  When I opened the RPD online, I can't add application roles it no more.

• Profile of custom security HR with assignment to the security level?

  Hi all
  
  I posted something similar in the HRMS forum, but after more thought, I think it's better done on this forum.
  
  Based on your experience you don't know if it's possible for a custom security profile HR use the assignment level security when it is used to report data through discoverer. Currently I am able to get my custom security profile to limit the data returned in Discoverer to a particular level, but if a person has more than 1 active, both are returned, when only 1 award is actually on my terms. I went from back to basics and you can see that this problem is still there even when I set the following simple condition in the custom security profile:
  
  ASSIGNMENT.assignment_id = '14444'
  
  With the above in place, 2 assignments for this person are always returned. I also tried checking the 'Restrict on individual assignments' option without a bit of luck. When HR above security profile is assigned a responsibility, which calls the form people & assignments, only the one active assignment is returned which is correct. Therefore, it must be something related to discoverer, my custom used views etc...
  
  Someone at - it ideas?
  
  Thank you
  
  Lance

  Update-> I think I have found the problem.

  The point of view PER_ASSIGNMENTS_F, making our discoverer HR report are based on, does not include security at the level of assignments (Note ID 419357.1). You can work around this problem either manually apply security (by using HR_SECURITY. SHOW_RECORD with the appropriate setting to indicate the level of transfer security to be used) or by using the view (exit Family Pack K) PER_ASSIGNMENTS_F2.

  The only differences between the 2 views are shown below:

  per_assignments_f

       WHERE DECODE (hr_security.view_all,
                    'Y', 'TRUE',
                    hr_security.show_record ('PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F',
                                             paa.assignment_id,
                                             paa.person_id,
                                             paa.assignment_type
                                            )
                   ) = 'TRUE' 
  

  PER_ASSIGNMENTS_F2

       WHERE DECODE (hr_security.view_all,
                    'Y', 'TRUE',
                    hr_security.show_record ('PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F',
                                             paa.assignment_id,
                                             paa.person_id,
                                             paa.assignment_type,
                                             'Y'
                                            )
                   ) = 'TRUE' 
  

  Hope this saves time and helps someone else.

  Thank you

  Lance

• Member migration security level

  I use file system option to migrate the planning application Life Cycle Management.
  
  However the security at the level of the members is not have migrated.
  
  I am able to export all the objects, other than the safety of Dimension members.
  
  Did I miss something...
  
  Please suggest...

  Hello

  Have you tried to export only the users on its own without anything else, you should get a file named users.xml produced.
  Have you tried it on another application, have you checked to see if there's anything in SharedServices_LCM.log

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

• With security enabled parental filter, why Google is blocked?

  I am forced to use Bing to do research on the net, Google is completely blocked. I used Family Safety Filter for months without this problem does anyone know why the change suddenly?

  I hate to say it, but it looks suspiciously like Microsoft attempting to block its main competitor on the search engine market. Surely, this would be illegal? Please don't answer and tell me to add an exception for Google. I want to know WHY his suddenly blocked, not how yet ANOTHER clumsy and annoying work around.

  This isn't just a minor irritation, my family needs to use Google Maps and Google Mail, so Bing does not replace.

  You can perform a system restore to when it was working properly, check if it works as expected.
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/what-is-system-restore

  If this does not work, check your settings and if necessary, add the site to the list of trust as you mentioned in your initial post.