SecurityException: JVM Shared, is not allowed to set the Security Manager

Similar Questions

• Photo Gallery can't open the photo because you are not allowed access to the location of the file

  Photo Gallery can't open the photo because you are not allowed access to the location of the file some of the image are open

  Click on the folder and change your permissions for it and all subfolders and files all rights and if necessary take hand the case (and maybe the parent folder or even its parent - and all of the subfolders and files) until you have the permission you need.  Here are the general procedures to help you:

  To view your permissions, right-click on the file/folder, click Properties, and check the Security tab.  Check the permissions you have by clicking on your user name (or group of users).  Here are the types of permissions, you may have: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-vista/What-are-permissions.  You must be an administrator or owner to change the permissions (and sometimes, being an administrator or even an owner is not sufficient - there are ways to block access (even if a smart administrator knows these ways and can move them - but usually should not because they did not have access, usually for a very good reason).)  Here's how to change the permissions of folder under Vista: http://www.online-tech-tips.com/windows-vista/set-file-folder-permissions-vista/.  To add take and the issuance of right of permissions and ownership in the right click menu (which will make it faster to get once it is configured), see the following article: http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/05/21/take-and-grant-full-control-permissions-and-ownership-in-windows-7-or-vista-right-click-menu/.

  To resolve this problem with folders, appropriating the files or the drive (as an administrator) and give you all the rights.  Right-click on the folder/drive, click Properties, click the Security tab and click on advanced and then click the owner tab.  Click on edit, and then click the name of the person you want to give to the property (you may need to add if it is not there--or maybe yourself). If you want that it applies to subfolders and files in this folder/drive, then check the box to replace the owner of subcontainers and objects, and click OK.  Back and now there is a new owner for files and folders/player who can change the required permissions.  Here is more information on the ownership of a file or a folder: http://www.vistax64.com/tutorials/67717-take-ownership-file.html.  To add take ownership in the menu of the right click (which will make it faster to get once it is configured), see the following article: http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/add-take-ownership-to-explorer-right-click-menu-in-vista/.

  Good luck and I hope this helps!

  Lorien - MCSA/MCSE/network + / has + - if this post solves your problem, please click the 'Mark as answer' or 'Useful' button at the top of this message. Marking a post as answer, or relatively useful, you help others find the answer more quickly.

• Windows 7 sees my second monitor as "generic non - PnP" and will not let me set the correct resolution

  Hello

  I just installed Windows 7 Professional 64 bit on a new hard drive on my Dell Studio 540. The PC has a graphics card ATI Radeon HD 3450 and has a Samsung 226bw 22 "monitor on the digital output. This works very well, and has the resolution of 1650 x 4050. When I am running Vista (on the previous hard drive), I got a monitor flat 14 "old on the other out, and it worked fine (although at a lower resolution).

  I added a monitor AOC F22s + on the other output, expecting to be able to put this to the recommended 1920 x 1080 resolution. Unfortunately, Windows has developed the driver for this monitor "Generic non - PnP" and will not let me set the correct resolution. To the maximum it will allow is 1600 x 1200, (as well as all other resolutions it allows) do not use the monitor at maximum capacity, which is the ratio of evil anyway, so the display seems tense.

  I run Windows Update, so have the latest drivers. I tried to install the other drivers, but nothing helped.

  I tried to unplug the Samsung monitor and restart the PC, so that the AOC, one was the only monitor it and he always had as 'Generic non - PnP' with the wrong resolution.

  Someone at - it ideas? I'm at my wits end. AOC support did not understand and could only suggest that the monitor was faulty, but the place where I bought it insist that it works very well and so no Exchange or get a refund (no restocking fee, which is a RIP-OFF).

  I really want to use both screens and would appreciate greatly any help that anyone can give. I hope I gave enough information. If I didn't, please let me know.

  Thanks in advance,

  Alan

  PROBLEM SOLVED!

  It turned out that my VGA cable was wrong and that it was not send the right signal to the computer. The screen worked fine with a VGA monitor, but the PC has not said that the new monitor is a PnP I tried a different cable and it worked fine.

  Thanks again to all who have suggested things.

• How to account user, allowing that file executable permission... not allowed to open the drive hard partition c, d, e, f, g and documents, etc.

  How to account user, allowing that file executable permission... not allowed to open the drive hard partition c, d, e, f, g and documents, etc.

  like Firefox allowed to open and Office World etc.

  and the scores of disk c:d:e:f: documents and unauthorized change setting.

  Hi UMIR,

  Assistance to your topic that you are looking for is more complex than what it is treated in this forum. It would be better suited in the Technet forums where the it professional can suggest you a solution regarding the same. Please visit the link below to find a community that will support what ask you

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/

  I hope this helps.

• "Error: not allowed to run the local process" during the execution of a WF in vRO7.0

  Hi all

  Need your help. We encountered a problem - "not allowed to run the local process", during the execution of a WF in vRO7.0.

  In this WF, they attempt to run the script class vRO 7.0 Server 'command. By default the Orchestrator applications having not allowed to run the command class, we get allowed by a mistake.

  To resolve this issue we need to set the system property ‘com.vmware.js.allow-local-process=true’ to the ‘vmo.properties’ properties file of the vRO 7.0 Orchestrator server.

  We already have the property to true for the properties file under ' / etc/vco/app-server " folder and after Orchestrator services are restarted. But still, we get the question.

  Another thing is that we use vRO cluster machines, so we put the real in both files to vmo.properties on both servers.

  
  

  Can you help me please how to fix?
  

  
  

  We have followed the link below.
  

  https://pubs.VMware.com/vSphere-50/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.VMware.vSphere.vco_administer.doc_42%2FGUID-F4995BD2-f2f7-48C0-B239-197F27FFE693.html

  Thank you

  Miloud

  Thanks llian, complete reboot of the devices/machines vRO made the resolution.

  Now everything works fine.

  Thank you

  Miloud

• BEA-494002: the current role of the connection is not allowed to use the console

  Versions of the product:
  SOA Suite 11.1.1.4
  WebLogic Server 10.3.4
  
  I create a domain template using model of Fusion Middleware domain generator (< MIDDLEWARE_HOME > \wlserver_10.3\common\bin\config_builder.cmd) with release template.jar
  Characteristics of the source domain:
  -Domain OSB (Oracle Service Bus)
  -a managed server
  -mode of development
  -jrockit JVM
  
  
  When I create a new field using template.jar, start admin server and try to access sbconsole, the lancers of error to follow:
  < 7 July 2011 14:02:45 BRT > < error > < ALSB Console > < BEA-494002 > < internal error occurred in OSBConsole: the current role of the connection is not allowed to use the console action: ' / StatusMessages ' com.bea.alsb.console.common.base.SBConsoleAccessException: the current role of the connection is not allowed to use the console action: ' / StatusMessages.
  at com.bea.alsb.console.common.base.SBConsoleRequestProcessor.processActionPerform(SBConsoleRequestProcessor.java:88)
  at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process(RequestProcessor.java:236)
  at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.processInternal(PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:556)
  at org.apache.beehive.netui.pageflow.PageFlowRequestProcessor.process(PageFlowRequestProcessor.java:853)
  at com.bea.alsb.console.common.base.SBConsoleRequestProcessor.process(SBConsoleRequestProcessor.java:191)
  Truncated. check the log file full stacktrace
  >
  
  Any idea?

  It is an old bug. This bug would be fixed with ALSB 3.0 :)

  Problem: Model ALSB 2.6 Builder does not include certain security files

  Applies to:
  Oracle Service Bus - Version: 2.6 and later versions [Release: Aqualogic Service Bus and later]
  Information in this document applies to any platform.

  Symptoms
  When a model is built from an existing default values area, the JAR file is the following security files:

  DefaultAuthorizerInit.ldift
  XACMLAuthorizerInit.ldift

  So if a new domain is created with the model, sbconsole throws an access control security errors.
  A similar problem occurs when you are using WLST to clone an existing domain.
  When you access the service bus console, he doesn't know that the 'weblogic' default user has administrator permissions.

  You receive the following exception:
  Throwable: com.bea.wli.common.base.SBConsoleAccessException:
  The current role of the connection is not allowed to use the console action: ' / viewAlertSummary '.

  Stack trace:
  com.bea.wli.common.base.SBConsoleAccessException: the current role of the connection is not allowed to use the console action: ' / viewAlertSummary '.
  at com.bea.wli.common.base.SBConsoleRequestProcessor.processActionPerform(SBConsoleRequestProcessor.java:73)

  Cause
  Security policy files that exist in the area were not being grouped in the domain model when you use Model Designer.
  Therefore, the default server policy files were used which are not applicable for ALSB areas.

  Solution
  You can implement the following workaround solution:

  with model generator:
  Ensure that the authorized person of the domain policy files are grouped in the model. This will cause these files to be extracted in the areas newly created (using the template). All new domain ALSB will be ALSB security policy files.

  UN - jar, the template.jar file.
  Copy the two files .ldift of the domain that you used to create the template and paste them into the safety record of the contents of the jar file.
  Re - jar file template.jar and create a domain using the template.

  with WLST:
  While cloning a copy existing domain missing files from the domain you created in the directory of your new domain security.

  Products
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Middleware > SOA > Oracle Service Bus > Oracle Service Bus

• APEX do not allow to change the lines of the columns that are the primary key?

  I have pictures:
  http://img508.imageshack.us/my.php?image=21269582oe8.jpg
  
  
  Book (id_book - 'Primary key', title, year); book_author (id_author id_book - 'Primary key', - 'Primary key'); author (id_author - "Primary key", name)
  
  
  
  I created a new page-> Form-> form of 'author' table because I want to add new authors, modification and deletion. During the creation of this page, I have chosen column 'id_author' as '1 primary key column' and everything is OK (I can't edit the 'id_author' column - this column is autoincrement and I can change the 'name' column).
  
  BUT I also created a new page-> Form-> table for table "book_author" because I like to write numbers like id_book and id_author, change and remove them (so add relations between tables: book, book_author and author). During the creation of this page, I have chosen column 'id_book' as '1 primary key column' and 'id_author' as 'column primary key 2'. And on the Web site, I can't edit these fields. And I can not add also new line because I see in each new line: (null).
  
  http://img444.imageshack.us/my.php?image=11324615yk9.jpg
  
  APEX do not allow to change the lines of the columns that are the primary key? It's stupid... What can I do?
  
  Edited by: user10731158 2008-12-20 11:40

  Column unique and not meaningful if you ever want to update. In the case of your example, you need to add an ID column in the intersection of book_author table. Honestly, I was so blown away (and pleasantly surprised) by the absence of rebuttal and the "thx" I advanced and set up an example of how I would define the book_author table:

  create table  book_author
     (id varchar2(32),
      book_id varchar2(32),
       author_id varchar2(32),
       modified_on     date,
       modified_by varchar2(255),
       constraint book_author_pk primary key (id),
       constraint book_auth_book_fk foreign key (book_id) references books(id),
       constraint book_auth_author_fk foreign key (author_id) references authors(id)
       )
  /
  
  create unique index book_author_uq on book_author (book_id,author_id)
  /
  
  create or replace trigger  biu_book_author before insert or update on book_author
  for each row
  begin
       if inserting then
            :new.id := sys_guid();
       end if;
       modified_on := sysdate;
       modified_by := nvl(v('APP_USER'),user);
  end;
  /
  

  Good luck
  Tyler

• iOS 10.0.1 "not allowed to use the restricted network port.

  I just upgraded my iPad Mini iOS 10.0.1. He is now running Safari 10. I tried to visit an internal/private IP on port 4190 using HTTP. I get an error that says:

  Safari cannot open the page.

  The error was: "not allowed to use the restricted network port.

  On iOS 9.3 using Safari 9, the same URL opens fine without this error.

  Do not know what has changed since iOS to iOS 10.0.1, 9.3 but I'm unable to visit a web site that I have visited before.

  I know that WebKit maintains a list of ports that you cannot go (e.g. 6666), 4190 is not a restricted port AFAIK. I don't know why I get this error message.

  It seems I was looking at the wrong source code.

  I finally got a clue where to look after visiting the page Web Safari Technology Preview 13.

  https://trac.WebKit.org/browser/releases/Apple/Safari%20Technology%20Preview%201 3/WebCore/platform/URL.cpp

  It seems port got 4190 recently added to the list of blockedPortList

  2306	2049, / / NFS
  220V	3659, / / apple-sasl / PasswordServer [addition of Apple]
  2308	4045, / / lockd
  2309	4190, / / ManageSieve [Apple adding]
  2310	6000, / / X 11
  2311	6665, / / alternate IRC [addition of Apple]
  2312	6666, / / alternate IRC [addition of Apple]
  2313	6667, / / standard IRC [addition of Apple]
  2314	6668, / / alternate IRC [addition of Apple]
  2315	6669, / / alternate IRC [addition of Apple]
  2316	invalidPortNumber, / / used to block all the invalid port numbers
  2317	};
  2318	const unsigned short * const blockedPortListEnd = blockedPortList + * _ARRAY_LENGTH (blockedPortList);

• Satellite M30 - user not allowed to update the BIOS

  I have a Satellite M30 (204, according to me, model 60 GB 1.6 GHz) and I try to update the BIOS but get the error message the "the user is not allowed to update the bios. The reason why I'm trying to update it is I just bought a 250 GB hard drive, but the BIOS does recognize that 128 GB and I guess the most up-to-date BIOS will allow the drives of this size, although I have not found any documentation for precise to say so be it.

  Someone at - it a patch to update the BIOS (I don't think I have a usb floppy drive drive anywhere) or to access the full capacity in other ways? Thank you.

  Ainsworth

  Hello

  could you please tell me what operating system you´re to help? I guess that Windows Xp...

  Usually, the update of the BIOS routine has absolutely NOTHING to do with the capacity of your hard disk drive. You are working with a limited user account? If not, I suggest right clicking on the BIOS update file and choose the option "Run as..". Subsequently a windows pop up and you ask under which user you want to run this program. Click on the "Next user" radio button and choose the administrator. If you have a password for your admin account and then type in, otherwise it should start automatically.

  Welcome them

• Not possible to set the HDMI output as default screen on Qosmio G30

  It is not possible to set the HDMI output as default screen! This works only with VGA output. There is no option in the BIOS. According to support, Toshiba will plan any action for this useful feature.

  I use an external TFT with HDMI adapter DVI Cable and I want to have as default screen TFT. With VGA, it will work without problems.
  Any solution?

  Best regards
  Nicolas

  Hi Nicolas

  Very interesting question! In my view, HDMI port is to be used with the HD ready LCD TVs or plasma. Combination of connection HDMI and HD DVD movies, you can really have a HD on your TV picture quality.

  As you know the port is a standard VGA port to connect external displays. The image quality is very good and, in my opinion, you should not use HDMI port for the same. Do you perhaps the best image quality?

• "You are not allowed to change the settings for this printer. If you need to change the settings, contact your system administrator.

  XP Pro, SP3. I downloaded the free Bullzip pdf printer. Somehow my old printer pdf in my printer disappeared list which I have used for years. I get this message when installing - "you are not allowed to change the settings for this printer. If you need to change the settings, contact your system administrator. I click ok and it ends, but it doesn't work. It does not appear in the printer control panel as a printer to change anything.

  I built this computer at home and I'm the only one using it. What is this function 'administrator '? I've never had to administrator on any program. Never. That is what it is?

  CNET is infamous for the grouping of things in its downloads as much a / v programs report as junk (I went through the same thing using eSet NOD32 has / v).  I seem to remember that if you ignore the warning and download the exe file and then use a tool like the free 7-zip to extract only the file necessary to run the program you want, you can work around the problem.

  For a pdf printer free which is not CNET - and works well - go here--> http://www.cutepdf.com/products/cutepdf/writer.asp

  EDIT TO ADD A LINK:

  See, for example, http://forums.cnet.com/7723-12543_102-582307/safe-downloads-cnet-com-sorry-but-not-anymore/

• Using Virgin go 2 broadband, why am I not allowed to access the internet?

  I want to use the Virgin @ go broadband on my laptop, why am I not allowed access to the internet?

  There could be several reasons why you can't access the internet. Are you getting any sort of error message? If so, what would you say?

  He has already worked, or is it a new product?

  You might consider posting your question in the forums of Virgin Mobile here:http://www.virginmobileusa.com/mobile-broadband/

• Cannot open this file because you are not allowed access to the location of the file

  I restored my compaq 510 professional vista, I get the "cannot open this file because you are not allowed access to the location of the file" whenever I tried to open a file or image

  I guess these are files from your previous installation. Take possession of them.

  A. check the permissions of the file or folder the file is saved in and appropriated:
        
  1. right click on the file or folder and then click Properties.
  2. click on the Security tab.
  3. under group or user names, click your name to see the permissions you have.

  To open a file, you must have the read permission. For more information about permissions, see what are permissions?

  http://tinyurl.com/2j9vgr

  To take ownership of a folder:

  1 right click on the folder you want to take control and then click Properties.
  2. click on the Security tab, click Advanced, and then click the owner tab.
  3. click on modify. Need administrator permission if you are prompted for an administrator password or a confirmation, type the password or provide confirmation.
  4. click on the name of the person you want to give to the property.
  5. If you want this person to be the owner of the files and subfolders in this folder, select the Replace owner of subcontainers and objects to check.
  6. click OK MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

• Receive error message, not allowed to enter the Cookies files in Vista

  When I go to Cookies, computer says I'm not allowed to this file... Why is this... I try to keep my cookies for a minum and do not want to use delete temporary files and cookies... because it removes all cookies and I have to sign on some new web pages... can you help me thanks

  Hello

  Cookies: Frequently asked questions
  http://windowshelp.Microsoft.com/Windows/en-us/help/c9daa36b-3bc0-47fa-aea1-5a250e2b4e561033.mspx

  How to allow or block Cookies in Internet Explorer for Vistahttp://www.vistax64.com/tutorials/60641-cookies.html

  Block or allow cookies
  http://windowshelp.Microsoft.com/Windows/en-us/help/ff035adb-411D-40F3-8F9F-23e158f7b8be1033.mspx
  Cookie Viewer - free
  http://www.KarenWare.com/PowerTools/ptcookie.asp

  CCleaner - free (allows you to protect specific cookies from deletion by CCleaner.)
  http://www.CCleaner.com/

  ======================================================

  Here are some easy ways to Take Ownership and Grant Full Admin Control

  Add 'Ownership' to the Menu Popup Explorer in Windows 7 or Vista
  http://www.howtogeek.com/HOWTO/Windows-Vista/add-take-ownership-to-Explorer-right-click-menu-in-Vista/

  How to add appropriate to the context Menu in Vista
  http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/112795-context-menu-take-ownership.html

  Take and Grant Full Control permissions and ownership in Windows 7 or Vista right click Menu
  http://www.mydigitallife.info/2009/05/21/take-and-grant-full-control-permissions-and-ownership-in-Windows-7-or-Vista-right-click-menu/

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  How to take possession of an item in Vista
  http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/67717-take-ownership-file.html

  How to change the permissions on the folders
  http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/157304-folder-permissions.html

  ===================================================

  From a post by Rehman F.

  Here are the steps to change the ownership and permissions of files and folders:

  1. right click on the file or folder, click Properties, and then click the Security tab.

  2. click on advanced and then click the owner tab.

  3. click on edit and then do one of the following:

  ·    To change the owner to a user or group that is not listed, click other users and groups, and in the box type
  the object name to select (examples), type the name of the user or group, and then click OK.

  ·    To change the owner to a user or a group is listed in the change owner to box, click the new owner.

  4. If you want to take ownership of the contents of the folder, select the replace the owner of sub containers and objects check box.

  5. click OK and then click Yes when you receive the following message is displayed:

  You are not allowed to read the contents of directory folder name. You want to replace the directory
  permissions with permissions granting you full control?

  All permissions will be replaced if you click Yes.

  Note folder_name is the name of the folder you want to take charge.

  6. click on OK and then reapply the permissions and security settings that you want for the folder and its contents.

  Additional considerations

  7· An administrator can take ownership of any file on the computer.

  8· Affecting the ownership of a file or a folder might require that raise you your permissions using user access control

  I hope this helps.

  Rob Brown - MS MVP - Windows Desktop Experience: Bike - Mark Twain said it right.

• Windows Vista security alert sending indicating virus attack and does not allow me to get security alerts. How to bypass or disable?

  Windows Vista security alert sending indicating virus attack and does not allow me to get security alerts.  How to bypass or disable?  I have another anti-spyware (Kapersky) program that manages all aspects and indicates no virus found.

  I want to disable Vista, but it won't let me and the only solution it says is to download a update for a cost.  Help, please.

  The 'alert' is not from Vista. Your computer is infected by a rogue security program. It's called "thugs" because he pretended to be a good guy but is really bad. Don't pay them!

  Bleeping Computer has the removal of many variants of thieves here steps - http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/virus-removal/remove-antivirus-vista-2010
  You can also check for the stages of removal at these links:

  Bleeping computer removal how - to - http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/forum55.html
  Malwarebytes malware removal guide - http://tinyurl.com/5xrpft

  Malwarebytes' Anti-malware (MBAM) or SuperAntiSpyware will often do the job. Both have free versions and you don't need to buy these programs.

  These can work for you, and all can be good. However, in many cases the computer will also infected with other horses of Trojan and protected by a rootkit. These machines are extremely difficult to clean. If your machine is one of these cases, either the interactive assistance to one of the specialty forums listed in the link below, OR take your machine to a professional on the local computer OR backup your data and do a clean install of Windows. It's your choice. I do not recommend using BigComputerStore/GeekSquad types of places.

  http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page2.html#HJT-links MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!